Monday, November 14, 2011

What is the function of Homosexuality in a Natural world?

In a time where the LGBT movement is aggressively attempting to convince people that they are as normal as everyone else, one question that they seem to avoid is:

What is the function of Homosexuality in a Natural World?  

We all have learned in Biology that Reproduction is a natural and needed function for a species to continue; however, that is not possible with Homosexuality, so what is its function in a natural world?  

Some Evolutionists say Homosexuality exists to control Population Growth, but if that were the case why did we just pass the 7 billion mark?   (R.H. Dennison - University of Wyoming)

So what are your thoughts?  What is the Natural Biological Function of Homosexuality?  Your comment should answer the following:

  • What is the Biological Function?

  • Is this function identical to Heterosexuality and in what way?

  • Provide data that supports any involvement of Genetics/Evolution in this.  


  1. Your entire argument hinges on the suggestion that reproduction is a human's only worthy purpose in life. Yet what of infertile people? Should they be mocked & ridiculed? Should they be banned from marriage considering they can't personally reproduce?

    And what about couples who simply don't want kids? Should those couples be banned from marriage? Should marriage only be for those who can & will produce kids?

  2. The topic does not mention purpose but function. It is not an argument, but a question based on the knowledge humanity has of Biology.

    What is the function of Homosexuality in a Natural World?

    Infertile people etc are beside the point and irrelevant.

  3. As per our twitter conversation: Although I understand you've posed this question specifically for this discussion, it's irrelvant to your key stance: that homosexuality is sinful

    Whether homosexuality plays an evolutionary role or not is a completely moot point - it exists and science (and common sense) HEAVILY supports the fact that it's not a choice but a physiological condition.

    So let me pose you a question: what weight of evidence do YOU require to accept that a persons sexual orientation IS NOT A CHOICE? What can we provide to you that would change your stance?


  5. And another:

  6. Presumably this isn't a satisfactory answer?

  7. Presumably this isn't a satisfactory answer?


Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.


Catholic Church (791) God (410) Jesus (351) Atheism (344) Bible (323) Jesus Christ (289) Pope Francis (237) Atheist (229) Liturgy of the Word (198) Science (157) LGBT (147) Christianity (139) Gay (82) Pope Benedict XVI (81) Rosa Rubicondior (79) Abortion (76) Prayer (66) President Obama (57) Liturgy (56) Physics (53) Philosophy (52) Vatican (51) Christian (50) Blessed Virgin Mary (48) Christmas (43) New York City (43) Psychology (43) Holy Eucharist (38) Women (35) Politics (34) Biology (32) Baseball (31) Supreme Court (31) NYPD (27) Religious Freedom (27) Health (24) Traditionalists (24) priests (24) Space (23) Pope John Paul II (22) Racism (22) Theology (21) Evil (20) First Amendment (20) Apologetics (19) Death (19) Pro Abortion (19) Protestant (19) Astrophysics (18) Christ (18) Evangelization (18) Child Abuse (17) Donald Trump (17) Illegal Immigrants (17) Priesthood (17) Pro Choice (17) Police (16) Pedophilia (15) Marriage (14) Vatican II (14) Divine Mercy (12) Blog (11) Eucharist (11) Gospel (11) Autism (10) Jewish (10) Morality (10) Muslims (10) Poverty (10) September 11 (10) Cognitive Psychology (9) Easter Sunday (9) Gender Theory (9) Holy Trinity (9) academia (9) CUNY (8) Human Rights (8) Pentecostals (8) Personhood (8) Sacraments (8) Big Bang Theory (7) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) Evidence (7) Hispanics (7) Spiritual Life (7) Barack Obama (6) Hell (6) Humanism (6) NY Yankees (6) Babies (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (5) Massimo Pigliucci (5) Podcast (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Angels (4) Donations (4) Ephebophilia (4) Pope Paul VI (4) Catholic Bloggers (3) Death penalty (3) Evangelicals (3) Founding Fathers (3) Pluto (3) Pope John XXIII (3) Baby Jesus (2) Dan Arel (2) Eastern Orthodox (2) Encyclical (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Plenary Indulgence (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)