Sunday, September 30, 2012

She said What?!?

"Contraception paid for by you" poster child, Sandra Fluke recently tweeted a tweet that might make those who call themselves "prochoice" fall over.   In her tweet, she calls an unborn fetus a "child."

This is not the first time "feminists" say the truth.  A "feminist atheist prochoice" twitter user did the same last year which I documented here:

They know the truth regarding the unborn. They just suffer from Cognitive Dissonance.  

Check it out:

Atheist attempt to regain pride

Our self-proclaimed Atheist rubicondior obviously lost it after losing a debate with me by forfeiting.  She is now disparaging me on Twitter, her blog and is calling for a massive reporting effort to suspend any opposition to atheism.   Twitter has been notified of this.  

Unfortunately, Twitter has an automatic suspension system that suspends accounts based on algorithmic codes.  This is something they need to work on if they are to keep their service user friendly and in accords with First Amendment rights.  The media was contacted regarding this.  These tactics can be used to control speech which is illegal.

Take the case of Guy Adams, a reporter who was suspended for tweeting on the Olympics.

Rubicondior recently posted a comment on my blog.  I replied with one of my own on her blog.  Let's see if she has the integrity to post it.  In any case, this was the comment:

Thank you Rosa for showing everyone how bitter you got after you were defeated by me. No one has ever brought you down to this level like I have. :)
I really dissected you before all. Now you feel the need to stalk me, misidentify me and call for massive reporting efforts against me. How immature is that? You are only harming yourself, not me. I can always come back and my blog is promoted via other means. Others are reporting you and your tweets on an hourly basis. It is self evident that your pride was hurt in August and you are retaliating... poor thing. You need anger management. It is not healthy keeping a grudge.
Reporting me and calling for others to do the same is not going to restore your dignity. If you debate me instead of running away, then this will show that you are confident in your agnostic beliefs and might restore the deference you lost after I challenged you and you bowed out like a coward.
The choice is yours: Debate me like I asked and restore some dignity or take on this new role as a bitter vengeful person who only exists on twitter to cyber bully.

Letter to UK Officials regarding Rubicondior

Below is the letter sent to the UK embassy in regards to the individual who goes under the parody alias "Rosa Rubicondior." The minor she abuses on her blog and twitter account finally saw my warnings and her tweets and took action. I have blocked the name out of respect for privacy.


British Consulate-General - New York
845 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Dear sir/madam, 

 There is an individual who goes by the name "Rosa Rubicondior" who is harassing and bullying me on blogger and Twitter. This individual is disparaging and defaming me in an attempt to attack someone out of mistaken identity. In this person's blog comments, the person posts my name, school and defames me: On twitter, a search for @rosarubicondior and ****** will show the tweet messages in which she attacks and defames me. I do not know who this person is. 

Again, the person seems to be confusing me with another person. I am concerned. It is embarrassing having my family and friends inquire as to why this individual is attacking me on the internet. Based on the blog and twitter account, I understand this individual to reside in England. What can I do to report this individual in your nation? It is scary to think that anyone can do this. I reported this to twitter and am waiting for a response and will be making a report to the blogger site. 

 I am a very private person and do not appreciate my name and other information which cannot be found in a search engine broadcast on social sites in an attempt to defame me - and out of mistaken identity for that matter. Any information or action will be truly appreciated. 

****** ****** ******


Here are Rosa's harassing and abusive libelous tweets:

Saturday, September 29, 2012

St. Michael the Archangel

Today is the feast day of St. Michael the Archangel and archangels Rafael and Gabriel.   St. Michael is the angelic being who took a stand against Lucifer. He defended God by exclaiming, "Who is like God."  The name "Michael" means exactly that.

Let us pray to St. Michael to help us defeat Lucifer whose pride forced him to equate himself to God.  Human beings are falling for this pride as well.  We have learned about the natural world and can manipulate it.  These achievements have gone to the head of some human beings into thinking we are God - the be all end all of the universe.  This pride is the source of ideas regarding when a person is a "person," the revision of marriage between a man and woman, the pollution and harm done to the Earth, the creation of harmful weapons, technologies that do harm to the planet and its living organism, and so on.  

St. Michael - Long Prayer:

“O Glorious Prince of the heavenly host, St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in the battle and in the terrible warfare that we are waging against the principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the evil spirits. Come to the aid of man, whom Almighty God created immortal, made in His own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the tyranny of Satan.

“Fight this day the battle of the Lord, together with the holy angels, as already thou hast fought the leader of the proud angels, Lucifer, and his apostate host, who were powerless to resist thee, nor was there place for them any longer in Heaven. That cruel, ancient serpent, who is called the devil or Satan who seduces the whole world, was cast into the abyss with his angels. Behold, this primeval enemy and slayer of men has taken courage. Transformed into an angel of light, he wanders about with all the multitude of wicked spirits, invading the earth in order to blot out the name of God and of His Christ, to seize upon, slay and cast into eternal perdition souls destined for the crown of eternal glory. This wicked dragon pours out, as a most impure flood, the venom of his malice on men of depraved mind and corrupt heart, the spirit of lying, of impiety, of blasphemy, and the pestilent breath of impurity, and of every vice and iniquity.

“These most crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most sacred possessions. In the Holy Place itself, where the See of Holy Peter and the Chair of Truth has been set up as the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may be.

“Arise then, O invincible Prince, bring help against the attacks of the lost spirits to the people of God, and give them the victory. They venerate thee as their protector and patron; in thee holy Church glories as her defense against the malicious power of hell; to thee has God entrusted the souls of men to be established in heavenly beatitude. Oh, pray to the God of peace that He may put Satan under our feet, so far conquered that he may no longer be able to hold men in captivity and harm the Church. Offer our prayers in the sight of the Most High, so that they may quickly find mercy in the sight of the Lord; and vanquishing the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, do thou again make him captive in the abyss, that he may no longer seduce the nations. Amen.
V. Behold the Cross of the Lord; be scattered ye hostile powers.
R. The Lion of the tribe of Judah has conquered the root of David.
V. Let Thy mercies be upon us, O Lord.
R. As we have hoped in Thee.
V. O Lord, hear my prayer.
R. And let my cry come unto Thee.

Let us pray.O God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, we call upon Thy holy Name, and as supplicants, we implore Thy clemency, that by the intercession of Mary, ever Virgin Immaculate and our Mother, and of the glorious St. Michael the Archangel, Thou wouldst deign to help us against Satan and all the other unclean spirits who wander about the world for the injury of the human race and the ruin of souls. Amen.”

Roman Raccolta, July 23, 1898, supplement approved July 31, 1902,
London: Burnes, Oates & Washbourne Ltd., 1935, 12th edition.

Friday, September 28, 2012

Failed Attempt

It is sad that Rosa Rubicondior has to resort to bullying campaigns to try to silence opposition.  She is still bitter over her debate loss in August of 2012.  Now she is telling people to report my twitter account.  They have been stalking me see my previous post:

The right channels have been contacted and the matter is now serious.

Please report @rosarubicondior and those who are spamming my mentions to  and

Here is Rosa's home thanks to my contacts.  The authorities have all the documentations necessary.

"Gospel of Jesus' wife" fragment is a fake

As I have stated before, this papyrus is a hoax. The L'Osservatore Romano which is the Vatican's newspaper has commented on the recent news regarding Jesus having a wife. Editor Gian Maria Vian had this to say: 
"Substantial reasons would lead one to conclude that the papyrus is indeed a clumsy forgery,... it is a fake."

Many in the academic world were skeptical to begin with when the news of this papyrus surfaced.
I write more about this find here:


Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Atheists Stalking Me

"  I always feel like somebody's watching me ..."  I'm sure you heard of that song where the late King of Pop Michael Jackson offers his vocals.

Well on twitter this is the case!  These atheists are stalking me.  YIKES!  Some even are going on Google trying to link the keyword sacerdotus to every name they can find.  From myspace, to, they have tried hard to discredit me by presenting me as some liar who was dismissed from the priesthood.  Can you believe this nonsense?

It is obvious that they are afraid of me.  They know that I can debunk atheism easily and expose the fraud it is.  They know that their sophistry cannot escape my rational mind which analyzes and finds fallacies instantly.  They will try anything to try to discredit me.  I am their biggest threat.

What is funny is that they are accusing me of stalking them, but like I always do I document everything.  So here click the link and see the 1000's of mentions from these disturbed people who are seeking attention by stalking my account.

Update: some tweets from stalkers discussing me and instigating.

Canadian Coldness

Stephen Woodworth’s pro-life motion was struck down in Canada 91 - 103.  Woodworth attempted to have Canada revise its criminal code section 223 which states that a human being becomes human only when born.

It is hard to believe that law makers do not know what a human being is.  Science tells us that a human being begins to exist at conception.  The only way to create a human being is via conception.  What will it take these people to realize the truth of human biology?  

From Conception to even post-death, the human body possesses the same DNA.  One does not become human being at birth.  One is already a human since conception.  It is there that the genes take form creating the genotype and phenotype that will guide our development throughout life.

If science does not convince politicians the truth and reality of when a human being begins to exist, then we are all in trouble.  It is scary to think that Pro-Abortion rhetoric can trump the voice of science.  

Rosa Rubicondior - All In The Name Of Jesus

At first, I thought Rubicondior's blog post would be about Jesus and the actions of His followers; however, she instead goes on a tangent writing about demons and people's interpretation of them in light of the understanding of the time. 

She cites St. Augustine, Michael Psellus, Richalmus, Richard Baxter, Athanasius and others in an attempt to appeal to authority. She grossly misinterprets their words and again shows that she is ignorant on the subject matter.

Futhermore, Rosa attempts to equate pagan ideas of demons with that of Christianity.  She goes on writing on incubi and succubi as if Christianity interprets demons in the manner the aforementioned are described.  

What is disturbing is not only Rosa's misunderstanding, but that she has plagiarized the information here:  It seems that Rosa splices up articles she finds on Google and makes minor adjustments before presenting it as her work.  This is academic fraud and dishonesty!

Rosa then makes the same mistake others do in claiming that the Papal bull Summis desiderantes affectibus somehow instigated the ideas she writes about.

The Catholic encyclopedia counters her claims:  

"It will be readily understood from the foregoing that the importance attached by many older writers to the Bull, "Summis desiderantes affectibus", of Pope Innocent VIII (1484), as though this papaldocument were responsible for the witch mania of the two succeeding centuries, is altogether illusory. Not only had an active campaign against most forms of sorcery already been going on for a long period, but in the matter of procedure, of punishments, of judges, etc., Innocent's Bull enacted nothing new. Its direct purport was simply to ratify the powers already conferred upon Henry Institorisand James Sprenger, inquisitors, to deal with persons of every class and with every form of crime (for example, with witchcraft as well as heresy), and it called upon the Bishop of Strasburg to lend theinquisitors all possible support.
Indirectly, however, by specifying the evil practices charged against the witches — for example their intercourse with incubi and succubi, their interference with the parturition of women and animals, the damage they did to cattle and the fruits of the earth, their power and malice in the infliction of pain and disease, the hindrance caused to men in their conjugal relations, and the witches' repudiation of the faith of their baptism — the pope must no doubt be considered to affirm the reality of these alleged phenomena. But, as even Hansen points out (Zauberwahn, 468, n. 3) "it is perfectly obvious that the Bull pronounces no dogmatic decision"; neither does the form suggest that the pope wishes to bind anyone to believe more about the reality of witchcraft than is involved in the utterances ofHoly Scripture. Probably the most disastrous episode was the publication a year or two later, by the same inquisitors, of the book "Malleus Maleficarum" (the hammer of witches).
 This work is divided into three parts, the first two of which deal with the reality of witchcraft as established by the Bible, etc., as well as its nature and horrors and the manner of dealing with it, while the third lays down practical rules for procedure whether the trial be conducted in an ecclesiastical or a secular court. There can be no doubt that the book, owing to its reproduction by the printing press, exercised great influence. It contained, indeed, nothing that was new. The "Formicaris" of John Nider, which had been written nearly fifty years earlier, exhibits just as intimate a knowledge of the supposed phenomena of sorcery. But the "Malleus" professed (in part fraudulently) to have been approved by the University of Cologne, and it was sensational in the stigma it attached to witchcraft as a worse crime than heresy and in its notable animus against the female sex. The subject at once began to attract attention even in the world of letters. Ulrich Molitoris a year or two later published a work, "De Lamiis", which, though disagreeing with the more extravagant of the representations made in the "Malleus", did not question the existence of witches. Other divines and popular preachers joined in the discussion, and, though many voices were raised on the side of common sense, the publicity thus given to these matters inflamed the popular imagination. Certainly the immediate effects of Innocent VIII's Bull have been greatly exaggerated.
Institoris started a witch campaign at Innsbruck in 1485, but here his procedure was severely criticised and resisted by the Bishop of Brixen (see Janssen, "Hist. of Germ. People", Eng. tr., XVI, 249-251). So far as the papal inquisitors were concerned, the Bull, especially in Germany, heralded the close rather than the commencement of their activity. The witch-trials of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were for the most part in secular hands."


Rubicondior is obviously confused on what a demon really is.  Her copying and pasting of random views on the matter adds to her confusion.

The Cathecism of the Catholic Church has this to say on the matter:

391 Behind the disobedient choice of our first parents lurks a seductive voice, opposed to God, which makes them fall into death out of envy.266Scripture and the Church's Tradition see in this being a fallen angel, called "Satan" or the "devil".267 The Church teaches that Satan was at first a good angel, made by God: "The devil and the other demons were indeed created naturally good by God, but they became evil by their own doing."268
392 Scripture speaks of a sin of these angels.269 This "fall" consists in the free choice of these created spirits, who radically and irrevocablyrejected God and his reign. We find a reflection of that rebellion in the tempter's words to our first parents: "You will be like God."270 The devil "has sinned from the beginning"; he is "a liar and the father of lies".271
393 It is the irrevocable character of their choice, and not a defect in the infinite divine mercy, that makes the angels' sin unforgivable. "There is no repentance for the angels after their fall, just as there is no repentance for men after death."272
394 Scripture witnesses to the disastrous influence of the one Jesus calls "a murderer from the beginning", who would even try to divert Jesus from the mission received from his Father.273 "The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil."274 In its consequences the gravest of these works was the mendacious seduction that led man to disobey God.

395 The power of Satan is, nonetheless, not infinite. He is only a creature, powerful from the fact that he is pure spirit, but still a creature. He cannot prevent the building up of God's reign. Although Satan may act in the world out of hatred for God and his kingdom in Christ Jesus, and although his action may cause grave injuries - of a spiritual nature and, indirectly, even of a physical nature- to each man and to society, the action is permitted by divine providence which with strength and gentleness guides human and cosmic history. It is a great mystery that providence should permit diabolical activity, but "we know that in everything God works for good with those who love him."275
Source: Cathecism of the Catholic Church,

The sources Rosa cites from must be taken into context.  The people at the time thought differently than we today.  Similarly, the words used back then do not have the same meanings as they do today.

As Catholicism was spreading throughout Europe it faced Paganism with its superstitions and ideas regarding witches and spirits.  The Church had to find a way to challenge these ideas.  The language in Church documents and documents of writers reflects the understanding and the attempts to communicate the Gospel to a particular people - most who were illiterate.

Not everything a saint wrote is part of doctrine.  This is what Rosa seems to imply indirectly by appealing to them.  Some wrote strange things - things incompatible with doctrine.  Aquinas was against the idea that Mary was Immaculately Conceived.  Even the Pope's writings are not dogma.  A book, essay, or even a homily is not official teaching just because it comes from a Pontiff.  The Pope can write, "There are aliens on Jupiter," this is not doctrine just because he wrote it.  Rosa and others must understand this.

Unfortunately, some Christians took their view of justice into their own hands and executed those suspected of witchcraft and other anti-Christian spirituality.  This is not the fault of the Church.  The Catholic Church never endorsed these acts.  These were committed by overzealous Christians who in the spirit of a pre-version of Jansenism took it upon themselves to punish in the name of God.  

Demons do exist.  The Catholic Church has been conducting exorcisms since its infancy.  In recent years, the number of these cases have increased.  However, this does not mean that the Church jumps to conclusions at every report of supposed demonic possession.  The Church heavily relies on Science to weed out mental illness or natural explanations prior to stepping in.



Psuedo Christians Protect Child Abusers

It is sad that there are those who call themselves "christian," but aid and abet in the abuse of a child.  

I have been drawing attention to @rosarubicondior's attack on a minor on her blog who she mistakenly thinks is me.  It is unfair to this child and his family having his name and private information posted on a lunatic's blog and at the same time be defamed because he lives in the Bronx - the poorest county in America.  @rosarubicondior 's derogatory and racist comments are uncalled for and is libelous.

What adds to this disturbing event is that earlier today a random individual @andrewwidener claiming to be "christian" spammed my mentions with pleads for me to stop exposing the child abuse @rosarubicondior is guilty of.  I found this extremely strange - Jesus did say:

"But whosoever shall offend one of these little ones who believe in me, it were profitable for him that a great millstone had been hanged upon his neck and he be sunk in the depths of the sea."  (Matthew 18:6

I do not understand why this supposed "christian" would plead for me to stop bringing to attention the child abuse @rosarubicondior is committing on her blog against this minor from a high school.  Is this what Jesus would do?  Would Jesus protect a delusional atheist over the welfare of a child?

This "christian" is now attacking me and threatening me with lawyers.  Really?  Does he not know that adults have an OBLIGATION to report child abuse to authorities?  By aiding and abetting @rosarubicondior and refusing to report the abuse, he is an accomplice to it by covering it up.

Tennessee law is clear on the matter:

Here is the exchange between us.  I want it to be documented so his supposedly lawyers and the authorities I've contacted can see I am in the right:

He then begins to deny the abuse and begins to attack and threatened me. It is my suspicion that this individual is an atheist socketpuppet. Notice how he all of a sudden becomes friendly with @rosarubicondior and she again gives him the minor's name.  It is another plot to further discredit me at the expense of this minor who she is identifying me with.  

Notice now how he is now siding with atheists. The same people who trash Christ and are aiding and abetting @rosarubicondior who is abusing a minor on her blog.  He also slanders me. Is this a real Christian? You decide.


Catholic Church (778) God (408) Jesus (347) Atheism (343) Bible (317) Jesus Christ (287) Pope Francis (233) Atheist (228) Liturgy of the Word (194) Science (156) LGBT (146) Christianity (139) Pope Benedict XVI (81) Gay (80) Rosa Rubicondior (79) Abortion (75) Prayer (66) President Obama (57) Liturgy (55) Physics (53) Philosophy (52) Christian (50) Vatican (50) Blessed Virgin Mary (46) Christmas (43) New York City (42) Psychology (42) Holy Eucharist (38) Politics (34) Women (34) Biology (32) Supreme Court (30) Baseball (29) NYPD (27) Religious Freedom (27) Traditionalists (24) priests (24) Health (23) Space (23) Pope John Paul II (22) Racism (22) Evil (20) Theology (20) Apologetics (19) First Amendment (19) Pro Abortion (19) Protestant (19) Astrophysics (18) Christ (18) Death (18) Child Abuse (17) Evangelization (17) Illegal Immigrants (17) Pro Choice (17) Donald Trump (16) Police (16) Priesthood (16) Pedophilia (15) Marriage (14) Vatican II (14) Divine Mercy (12) Blog (11) Eucharist (11) Gospel (11) Autism (10) Jewish (10) Morality (10) Muslims (10) Poverty (10) September 11 (10) Easter Sunday (9) Gender Theory (9) Holy Trinity (9) academia (9) CUNY (8) Cognitive Psychology (8) Human Rights (8) Pentecostals (8) Personhood (8) Sacraments (8) Big Bang Theory (7) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) Evidence (7) Spiritual Life (7) Barack Obama (6) Hell (6) Hispanics (6) Humanism (6) NY Yankees (6) Babies (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (5) Massimo Pigliucci (5) Podcast (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Angels (4) Donations (4) Ephebophilia (4) Pope Paul VI (4) Catholic Bloggers (3) Death penalty (3) Evangelicals (3) Pluto (3) Pope John XXIII (3) Baby Jesus (2) Dan Arel (2) Eastern Orthodox (2) Encyclical (2) Founding Fathers (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Plenary Indulgence (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)