13th Sunday of Ordinary Time Year B: Death Does Not Win

The readings for the 13th Sunday of Ordinary Time Year B offer a profound depth of spiritual insight and reflection. 

The first reading from the Book of Wisdom (Wisdom 1:13-15; 2:23-24) contemplates the nature of life and death, emphasizing that God did not create death, but rather, it entered the world through the devil's envy. This passage invites us to reflect on the sanctity of life and God's intention for creation to exist in harmony and immortality. It reminds us that the devil is the cause of death. People often blame God for evil and death when in reality it is the devil's fault. Out of envy for humanity, the devil brought about death via sin.

The Responsorial Psalm, Psalm 30, is a heartfelt expression of gratitude towards God for deliverance and rescue. It is a reminder of God's mercy and the transformative power of thanksgiving, turning mourning into dancing and sorrow into joy.

In the second reading, Paul's letter to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 8:7,9,13-15) calls on the community to live in generosity and equality. It highlights the gracious act of our Lord Jesus Christ, who, though rich, became poor for our sake, setting an example of selflessness and solidarity with the needy.  Jesus became one of us in all things except sin.

The Gospel reading from Mark (Mark 5:21-43) presents two miraculous healings performed by Jesus. The first is the healing of a woman who had been suffering from hemorrhages for twelve years, and the second is the raising of Jairus's daughter saying "Talita Cumi" or Little girl child get up. Both stories are united by themes of faith, desperation, and the transformative touch of Jesus. They show that Jesus' power to heal and to give life transcends all barriers, offering hope and new life to all who reach out to him in faith.

Death is not the end. Jesus conquered it. We all have to die one day. There is no way around it. It is the wage of sin. However, Jesus conquered it in His resurrection. He became the lord of death if you will. We all lose people all the time. Recently I lost my sister and my dad before her as well as a host of cousins, an aunt, and a brother-in-law. It is not something we all anticipate or enjoy.  Even when you think you got used to having lost someone, the next death still hits hard. We never get used to it. We never adapt to it. It hurts a lot. What hurts a lot is the absence, seeing the things and people they left behind, and going to spots where memories were shared. After someone dies, we feel a part of us goes. We feel incomplete. Right now, I feel like I am not myself and possibly will never be. There is just a surreal feeling or sensation in the air, so to speak. It is hard to describe but is just dreadful. At one moment you feel fine and the next you just melt into yourself and memories. 

This is the human side of things. We cannot escape it. We are finite creatures that can only process the here and now. We can only process space-time and matter.  We are attached to this material universe so when a part of it goes missing, we freak out.  It can be difficult to ascertain eternity and that things do not truly disappear like we think. Even this universe's energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it transforms. On the spiritual level, it is even more spectacular, so spectacular that we cannot fathom it now completely.  Jesus' resurrection reminds us that we too will rise at the end of time. When Jesus returns in all His glory the dead shall rise. We will see our lost loved ones again. It is ok and normal to miss our deceased loved ones. This shows we love them and their detachment from us in the physical realm hurts.  However, death is not the end.  

Many of us wonder why our deceased ones never come back to say hi. If they live on, why are they not allowed to visit us? Well, there are many answers to this, but I will use the one my friend and pastor the late Bishop Francisco Garmendia told a child once who asked something similar. The bishop said that our deceased loved ones seem to move on and not contact us because they saw God. They saw absolute goodness, beauty, power, and the overall awesomeness of the Creator, the I AM or being that was always in existence and from which all derives existence.  Once our souls sees this beatific vision, why would it go back to earth? Why would it desire the physical realm again?  God is greater than what we leave behind. God is love. Once we connect fully with God, nothing else is needed so the soul is stuck in ecstasy.  This does not mean our loved ones forget us or do not care, it just means that they made it. They connected with God and await our turn. 

Think of it this way, suppose you lived in a poor area and won the lottery. You then purchase a mansion in a beautiful area. Are you going to return to the poor area?  The answer is most likely not. This is why we see celebrities like Jennifer Lopez who prides herself as "Jenny from the block," but never bought a house in that block in the Bronx. We seldom see these "famous" and rich people return to their stomping grounds. This is because they found something "better" from their perspective. Similarly, when we die and see God, what else is there? God is the absolute.  We will not miss the past or anything from the physical realm because we have the absolute or God.  So when you are down and out like I am and members of my family, think of this. Think of Jesus' power to raise the death and rise Himself from the death. Death is not the end.  We will suffer the loss of course, but death is not the end. We belong to God. We are the breath of God. That breath has to return eventually. The people we lose in life do not belong to us. They are God's breath and were called home.  We will join them eventually when it is our time. 

These readings collectively challenge us to consider our own attitudes toward life, death, and our responsibilities toward others. They encourage us to trust in God's saving power and to act with compassion and generosity, following the example of Christ. As we meditate on these scriptures, we are invited to deepen our understanding of God's love and to carry that love into our daily interactions with others.

Lastly, on a side note, we want to address today's event: Pride.  Today in New York City there will be the annual Gay Pride March. This is an event or parade commemorating the raid by the NYPD on the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar.  Regardless of how we feel about homosexuals, we must love them, respect them, and pray for them. We must also protect them. These people glorify pride and sin and this often upsets Christians. However, we must pray for them and their conversion. Jesus on the Cross prayed to His Father to forgive the people for they know not what they do.  While gay people choose to do sinful things with full knowledge, they deep down do not know what they are doing. They do not know the spiritual aspect of the evil they commit. To them, they see it as an evolution of self-expression. They are being their "true selves." This is what they process their sins as. Again, they are deluded by satan.  Remember the first reading about the devil being envious of us.  Homosexuals are lied to by the devil. Like with Eve, he tells them all these lies about "living their truth" and all these sweet enticing terms and jargon meant to deceive.  

In Genesis, we read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.  Many Christians often focus on the destruction of the cities via flames from the sky.  On YouTube, I have seen some preachers proselytize at pride events instigating gay participants to display themselves in feral ways. The preachers then promote the content as "devils coming out," or in some other demeaning manner meant to portray the gays as some demons that manifest when the preachers preach. This is vanity and wrong on the preacher's part. The Gospel is an invitation to Christ's love, not a weapon to beat people with. In light of this, we should not be going to pride to harass gay people. Instead, we should witness to Christ by showing love and mercy.  Back to Sodom and Gomorrah, Christians forget the other part of the story where Abraham pleads for the people before God. He asks if 30, 20, and 10 are good, would God spare the cities?  God says that He would. We see the Divine Mercy here.  We should focus more on this part when dealing with pride and any homosexual event or gathering. We should ask God to spare them, to forgive them, to destroy their sin, not them.  This is what it means to be a Christian.  This is how we show that it is not "Love is love," but "God is love."  

So let us pray for these people marching today.  They are victims of the devil's deception and our brothers and sisters, sons and daughters. They are victims, not our enemies.  Pray for them. Witness to them with Christ's love until we all share in pride as sons and daughters of God, not of sin.  

 .

Just in Time For 'Pride:" Gay Porn Actor 'Austin Wolf" Arrested For Child Porn

Just in time for the end of "Gay Pride Month" with the Pride March taking place June 30th, 2024, we have some gay news to report.  A popular gay porn degenerate named "Austin Wolf" was arrested on Friday by the FBI after a probe was conducted on the encrypted app Telegram.  "Wolf" whose l name is Justin Heath Smith 43 years of age exchanged videos with FBI agents pretending to be fans of child pornography. 

The videos are described as horrific and even showed a 10-year-old male child bound and being raped. The degenerate gay porn actor sent the disgusting content from a Manhattan apartment he rented.  This location was raided in April and over 200 videos depicting child porn on an SD card were discovered inside his personal computer room.

Smith was ordered to be held without bail at a Manhattan federal court.  New York prosecutor Getzel Berger said he is a "danger to children online, danger to children offline, danger to children everywhere."  Smith is being defended by lawyer Michael Baldassare who requested from US Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky that Smith be placed under 24-hour house arrest while wearing a GPS monitor.  

His attorney also pleaded with the judge not to send his client to Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center which is known as a dangerous location and where an inmate was stabbed to death recently.  However, Tarnofsky called the allegations "very troubling" and that letting Smith go under house arrest "could not reasonably assure the safety of the community."  Smith was charged with counts of distributing and reception of child pornography as well as possession of it.  He faces 5 to 20 years in a federal prison.  Federal marshals escorted Smith out of the courtroom as his partner of 10 years mouthed to him, "I'm sorry."  He will appear in court again in July.

This story is of no surprise to anyone.  Since the 1940s it was always the suspicion of law enforcement, psychologists, parents, and others at the time that homosexuals were predators of children.  There were even videos of this propaganda aired on television and presented at schools and churches.  Take this one for example:

Psychology before the 1970s was much different. It was not politically correct.  Psychologists like John B. Watson, Joseph Nicolosi, Richard Socarides, and others seriously sought to understand homosexuality and condemned it as a mental illness. They even offered treatments or conversion therapies.  This is a topic for another post, however, we wanted to bring this up in relation to the news of today and why there has always been a link between pedophilia, ephebophilia, and homosexuality. 

Since the existence of homosexuality, records available to us from ancient Greeks, Romans, and older civilizations show a pattern of a fondness for younger men and boys on the part of homosexuals of the time which extends to today.  We see in these ancient civilizations how wealthy and powerful men often had a concubine on the side who was a younger male. In most instances, they were young boys who had yet to hit puberty.  This was accepted at the time just like with the relationship between the alleged prophet Mohammed and the nine-year-old Aisha who was the wife he had.  

Today it is a somewhat different world. These kinds of "relationships" are frowned upon and are illegal in most nations with some offering ages of consent as a gray area.  In the gay or lgbtqia community things have not really changed. We still see a fondness for younger men on the part of older men. These young men are called "Twinks" while the older men are called "Bears," "DILFs," or "dad/daddies."  In many gay porn productions, the fantasy of "dad and son" is often played out. There are even some with gay men and younger men playing the role of priest and altar boy.  Teacher and son, coach and player, or even uncle and nephew are not far behind. It is a world of perversion devoid of morals and reason. 

In gay apps used to "hook up" or find "partners," there are often many young gay men who are minors who pretend to be older in order to "experiment" or find their "older men" types. Law enforcement often ignores these apps where a lot of sexual abuse of minors is initiated.   The images demonstrated here show 'Austin Wolf' engaging in sexual perversions and courtship with younger men, one looks extremely young, possibly a teenager. This is the content these gay porn companies make and the content has a lot of subscribers.

With the onset of Only Fans, many young teen boys are using the site to make money from old perverted men seeking to enjoy their young bodies.  Again, no one does anything about this.  It is left to the side. This is why 'Austin Wolf' felt confident enough to send and receive child pornography on an app like Telegram. There is a whole world out there that is hidden but not hidden, per se.    This perverted gay porn star is just one of the many more out there.  

However, with the atmosphere of political correctness the powers that be are afraid to touch the homosexual community out of fear of being labeled homophobic. This is the world we live in today.  Hopefully the people "Wolf" was sending child porn to are apprehended as well and the FBI begins to monitor gay institutions, apps, and porn channels.  Rest assured that Telegram is not the only place this evil thing is exchanged.   

Unfortunately, our own Catholic Church and her seminaries have been infected with this "filth" as the late Pope Benedict XVI described it and we describe it as pure evil.  

Kudos to the FBI for monitoring Telegram. Let us hope and pray they expand and monitor everything else.  This evil is real and is in plain sight.  Those who find a sexual fantasy of "dad and son," "uncle," "teacher and student" or even use terms like "twink, daddy and bear" need to be monitored.  It is most likely these perverted and disturbed individuals have skeletons in the closets they came out from.  

Parents and guardians, teachers, and others, please keep an eye on kids and their activities. Please protect them! There are a lot of evil perverted and disgusting animals out there posing as humans.  It is no wonder why Smith used the porn name "Wolf." He is a wolf preying on the young.  Unfortunately, he is not the only one. This is scary to think about!   

 

Source: 

Popular gay porn star Austin Wolf busted for trading sickening child porn: feds (nypost.com) 

Adult Film Actor Austin Wolf Charged With Distribution of Child Porn | Complex

Porn star Austin Wolf arrested following FBI investigation | Fox News

Adult film star Austin Wolf is arrested over horrific child pornography video charges | Daily Mail Online

Adult film star Austin Wolf is arrested on charges of distributing child sexual abuse material online (nbcnews.com)

austin wolf - Google Search

Austin Wolf arrested on child pornography charges in NYC – NBC New York

Gay Porn Star Austin Wolf Arrested on Child Pornography Charges (tmz.com)

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/adult-film-actor-justin-heath-smith-aka-austin-wolf-charged-distribution-child

Lucifer: Angel of Music & Human Mind Control

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Trump vs Biden: Presidential Debate

The Dynamics of a Presidential Debate: A Closer Look at the 2024 Showdown

Presidential debates are a pivotal aspect of American democracy, offering a platform for candidates to present their policies, challenge their opponents, and persuade undecided voters. The first presidential debate of 2024 has already made headlines, with former President Trump and President Biden facing off in a heated exchange that captivated the nation.

The debate, held in Atlanta, was marked by a series of clashes over key issues such as immigration, the economy, and abortion rights. Trump's performance was perceived as dominant by some, with a CNN flash poll suggesting a majority of viewers considered him the winner. However, the debate was not without controversy, as both candidates engaged in personal attacks and Trump faced criticism for several misleading statements.

One of the most significant moments of the debate was the discussion on immigration, where Trump criticized Biden's policies, claiming they have turned every state into a "border state" and describing the situation as a "rat's nest". Biden, on the other hand, stumbled at times but regained his footing, countering Trump's physical fitness and labeling him a "whiner" and a "loser".

The debate also touched on the sensitive topic of abortion, with Trump stating he would not block abortion medication despite his administration's role in overturning Roe v. Wade. Biden vehemently disagreed with the overturning, promising to reinstate Roe's protections if re-elected.

The exchange between the two leaders was not just a battle of policies but also a display of their contrasting styles and approaches to leadership. The debate's impact on the electorate remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly sets the stage for a fiercely contested election.

As the country moves closer to election day, the importance of these debates in shaping public opinion cannot be overstated. They are a testament to the vibrant political discourse that defines the United States, and their influence on the democratic process is profound.

The 2024 Presidential Debate: Unpacking the Key Moments

The first presidential debate of 2024 was a spectacle of political theater, with President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump engaging in a verbal duel that left the audience both intrigued and concerned about the future of American politics. The debate was rife with significant moments that will likely be dissected and discussed in the days leading up to the election.

One of the most talked-about moments was the candidates' refusal to shake hands at the beginning of the debate, breaking from a long-standing tradition and setting a contentious tone for the evening. This act was symbolic of the deep divisions within American politics and the personal animosity between the two candidates.

The debate took a personal turn when the topic of military service was broached. Biden invoked the memory of his late son, Beau Biden, who served in Iraq, in response to reports that Trump had previously referred to U.S. veterans as "suckers" and "losers." Biden's emotional defense of his son's service and his subsequent labeling of Trump as the "sucker" and "loser" was a poignant moment that resonated with many viewers.

Another key moment was the discussion on the January 6th Capitol riot. Trump refused to accept responsibility for the events of that day, instead attempting to shift the blame to others. Biden, in contrast, held firm in his condemnation of the rioters and Trump's role in inciting them, emphasizing the need for accountability.

The economy was also a central topic, with both candidates sparring over their records and plans to address inflation and job growth. Trump touted his administration's economic achievements, while Biden pointed to his efforts to rebuild the economy post-pandemic.

Abortion rights, a deeply divisive issue, were also front and center. Trump celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade and falsely claimed that Biden's administration supported late-term abortions and infanticide. Biden committed to restoring the protections of Roe v. Wade, highlighting the importance of reproductive rights.

The debate was not without its gaffes. Biden stumbled during a discussion on healthcare, which Trump quickly capitalized on, accusing Biden of planning to "wipe out Medicare". These moments of vulnerability and attack are often what stick in the minds of voters and can sway public opinion.

Climate change, another critical issue, saw Trump boasting about his environmental record, despite having withdrawn from the Paris Climate Accords. Biden countered by emphasizing the urgency of addressing the climate crisis and criticized Trump's lack of action.

The debate showcased the stark contrasts between the two candidates, not only in policy but in demeanor and approach to leadership. As the nation processes the flurry of exchanges from the debate, it is clear that these key moments will play a significant role in shaping the decisions of voters as they head to the polls.

Our take on the Presidential Debate 2024. 

Biden clearly lost. He was disorientated, incoherent, and sounded like Don Corleone from the Godfather franchise (campaign workers claim he has a cold), and his policies were not clear. He looked senile and at many times appealed to pity with his body language.  It is no surprise that his democratic party is in panic mode and there are talks of trying to remove him from the ticket while others are even considering the idea that he should be removed from office now.  This is serious indeed!  The Joe Biden we saw tonight is not the same one we saw in 2020 where words like "malarkey" were thrown around and we saw a feisty candidate animated and confident.  Tonight we saw a frail man who looked out of it. He could hardly be understood prompting Trump to state, "I didn't understand what he said and I don't think he knows what he said."  

Biden looked more like a senile old man in a nursing home who is having trouble collecting his thoughts instead of a viable presidential candidate.  He confirmed to the world what Trump and many others have been stating about his age and fitness to serve. This is why his campaign and party are in panic mode. They do not know what to do.  Biden looked robotic and confused at times. His reactions were slow and he often contradicted himself.  

Trump won, but only in optics and presentation, not content. He deflected a lot, repeated his record, and never gave policies for this term if he wins. It was more narcissistic than anything else. Trump did not give any new ideas or plans. He simply argued from authority highlighting his claims of achievements. Many of the things he said were misinformed or simply just not true. They were embellished statements clearly meant to give an air of confidence and stability. People watching and who know the facts were left shaking their heads in disbelief at the falsehoods and half-truths the former president posited during the debate.

Like typical Trump, he focused on illegal immigrants blaming them for pretty much everything except the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic. He deflected on numerous occasions and often took the time to address Biden's previous comments instead of the questions posed by the moderators.  He was composed during the debate, a rarity for him. There were no outbursts or overspeaking on the part of Trump. He followed the rules. 

In closing, both candidates did not do well on the material.  They often deflected, especially Trump. Neither addressed childcare nor explicitly explained anything about their plans regarding addressing climate change.  At times, it looked like two old men arguing and then forgetting what they argued about. At times we felt sorry for Biden who looked like a fish out of water, so to speak. He looked so fragile and aloof that it can almost be said with confidence that his attendance there was abuse on the part of the democratic party and his campaign.  He should not have been there. 

This debate confined for voters many things, among them, that Biden is simply unfit to be president now or in 2024. He simply cannot do this anymore.  He should be retired in Delaware with his wife and pets. His performance or lack thereof brings to question who is really running the White House.  There is no way we can confidently believe that this man we saw tonight is the commander-in-chief.  There has to be a skeleton crew working behind the scenes, so to speak. 

Moreover, voters have confirmation of what we all have been concerned with: there really is no viable candidate. The 2024 election will be one for the history books. On one hand, we have a sitting president who is clearly no fit for office, and on the other, we have a former president recently convicted as a felon who continues the same rhetoric from 2016 without any plans on how to address today's issues.  In regards to abortion, he has also flipped-flop on the issue now claiming he is for "exceptions" when in the past he said otherwise and claimed to be truly pro-life. 

The United States of America is in a pickle, in a word.  It may be time to figure out how to create a better system that vets candidates so we will never repeat this election year again. We cannot have criminals or senile folks run for office. The presidency is an important job.  This is not a school president or president of a club. This is the president and leader of the so-called free world.  

Tonight's debate most likely shifted views but diehard democrats will still vote for their person without considering the consequences. We see this in blue states where despite a Democrat doing a horrible job, he or she has an assured job as long as blind democrats vote on party lines instead of conscience and reason.  Similarly, Republicans will vote for anyone who is strong against illegal immigration and abortion. They do not seem to know there are other issues out there.  

Credit must also be given to the CNN moderators who are softened biased against Trump. They were fair, did not help either candidate, gave both fair time and attention, and did a good job.  Kudos to them despite Dana Bash dressed in the cliche white for women's suffrage.  

An online poll we conducted on X (formerly Twitter) is below the sources. They show a win for Trump. 

 

 Sources:

Live updates: Trump, Biden presidential debate, analysis and reaction | CNN Politics

‘Defcon 1 moment’: Biden’s debate performance sends Democrats into panic | US elections 2024 | The Guardian

Six Takeaways From the First Biden-Trump Presidential Debate - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

These Are The Likely Democratic Presidential Candidates If Biden Drops Out After Debate—From Newsom To Whitmer (forbes.com)

Dems freak out over Biden’s debate performance: ‘Biden is toast’ - POLITICO

A raspy Biden gets off to a halting start against Trump in the first 2024 presidential election debate | Fox News

Should Biden continue election? David Axelrod says there will be talks (usatoday.com)

Time to Go, Joe Biden - The Atlantic

Biden Is Sick With a Cold: Campaign Source (wsj.com)

Could Democrats Replace Biden as their nominee? What to know. - Vox

US presidential debate 2024 updates: Biden struggles, Trump deflects | US Election 2024 News | Al Jazeera

Who won? #PresidentialDebate #PresidentialDebate2024 #Debates2024 #debate

— ☧✝️Sacerdotus™⚛✡🇻🇦☧ (@Sacerdotus) June 28, 2024

DJ Rob Swift Goes After Tariq Nasheed

Exploring the Dynamic World of Hip-Hop: DJ Rob Swift and the Cultural Discourse

Hip-hop culture is a vibrant and ever-evolving art form, encompassing various elements such as DJing, rapping, breakdancing, and graffiti. At the heart of this culture lies the ongoing dialogue about its origins, influences, and the contributions of diverse communities. Recently, a fascinating exchange unfolded between DJ Rob Swift, a veteran turntablist and member of the X-ecutioners, and Tariq Nasheed, a filmmaker and internet personality known for his documentary and race-baiting work.

The discourse centered around the historical narrative of hip-hop's birth and the roles played by different ethnic groups in its development. DJ Rob Swift, in a series of tweets, challenged the notion that hip-hop was exclusively a Black American creation, highlighting the contributions of Latino artists in the early days of the movement. He cited figures like Trac 2 (Luis Angel Mateo) and Spy (Lein Figueroa), who were instrumental in shaping the breakdancing element of hip-hop.

Tariq Nasheed, known for his documentary "Microphone Check: The Hidden History of Hip-Hop," (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2024/06/microphone-check-mockumentary-that.html) engaged in this dialogue, questioning the claims about the ethnic diversity of hip-hop's pioneers. The exchange reflects a broader conversation within the hip-hop community about representation, acknowledgment, and the importance of recognizing the multifaceted roots of this global phenomenon.

DJ Rob Swift's journey in hip-hop is marked by significant achievements, including his participation in the 1992 American DMC Finals, his showcase at the 2017 DMC USA Finals, and his educational efforts in sharing the cardinal rules of DJing through various platforms. His commitment to the craft and his advocacy for a comprehensive understanding of hip-hop's history underscores the complexity and richness of the culture.

Both went at it on X (formerly Twitter) with DJ Rob Swift correcting Taqir Nasheed's anti-Puerto Rican rhetoric which attempts to erase Puerto Ricans from Hip Hop and its creation.  Puerto Ricans are co-creators of Hip Hop. There is no denying this (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/08/puerto-ricans-co-creators-of-hip-hop.html). Nasheed's work attempts to use sophism and revisionism in order to rewrite Hip Hop history erasing Puerto Ricans and even the Bronx from the equations.  Pioneers like Dj Rob Swift and others are not having it and have countered Nasheed's lies and fabrications rooted in race-baiting and anti-Latino rhetoric.  

See the exchange on X (formerly Twitter):

Not all of the founders of Hip Hop say it was “100% Black”. Some first generation Writers were White. Some first generation B Boys were Latino. Felipe Luciano (member of the Last Poets) is Puerto Rican. The founders who say it was “100% Black” are victims of the Mandela Effect. pic.twitter.com/l4snam0YJw

— BROLICARM (@DJROBSWIFT) May 27, 2024

what first generation B Boy was Latino? What's his name ?

— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed) May 27, 2024

In Hip-Hop, no element was "invented" by a single individual. In the case of Breaking specifically, the dance was codified by a community of dancers over a period of time. The Zulu Kings might have laid the first cornerstones, yes. Still, B-Boys like Trac 2 (Luis Angel Mateo) and… pic.twitter.com/K5qAIRLmhB

— BROLICARM (@DJROBSWIFT) May 31, 2024

As hip-hop continues to influence and be influenced by artists and enthusiasts worldwide, conversations like the one between DJ Rob Swift and Tariq Nasheed serve as a reminder of the genre's dynamic nature. They invite fans and practitioners alike to delve deeper into the narratives that have shaped hip-hop and to appreciate the diverse contributions that have made it the powerful and unifying art form it is today.

For those interested in exploring the technical skills and artistic expressions within hip-hop, DJ Rob Swift's insights and performances offer a window into the dedication and creativity required to excel in this field. His work, along with the ongoing debates about hip-hop's history, provides valuable perspectives for anyone looking to understand or participate in the culture.

As hip-hop approaches its fifth decade, the dialogue about its origins and evolution remains as relevant as ever. It is a conversation that not only celebrates the past but also shapes the future of this influential cultural movement. Whether through documentaries, social media exchanges, or live performances, the stories of hip-hop continue to inspire and challenge us, reflecting the diverse voices that have contributed to its enduring legacy.

Source:

DJ Rob Swift Slams Tariq Nasheed's "Hidden History Of Hip-Hop" Claims (allhiphop.com)

DJ Rob Swift Slams Tariq Nasheed's "Hidden History Of Hip-Hop" Claims (allhiphop.com)

Microphone Check: A Mockumentary That Resonates with Hip Hop Fiction & Racial Revisionism

The world of hip-hop is vast and vibrant, filled with stories that are waiting to be told. "Microphone Check" is a "documentary" that attempts to dive deep into this culture, exploring its history and the profound impact it has had on society. However, it created something different and fictional. 

Directed by Tariq Nasheed a known race-baiter, this film has garnered attention for its pretense as an authentic portrayal and energetic storytelling, earning a high rating on Rotten Tomatoes clearly from bots and fake reviews.

The documentary has been praised for its insightful interviews with hip-hop legends, archival footage that brings the past to life, and a narrative that captures the essence of hip-hop's influence. It's not just a film; it's a journey through the evolution of a genre that has shaped music, fashion, language, and lifestyle.  This is what some claim. However, those of us who are Hip Hop culture born and raised in the culture in the Bronx are disgusted at it. It is disrespectful. It is a mockumentary.  

The documentary "Microphone Check" has garnered a mix of reviews, with some critics offering high praise for its exploration of hip-hop's origins and others expressing disappointment. One particularly critical review highlighted several areas where the documentary fell short.

Firstly, the critic pointed out that while the documentary aimed to uncover the true history of hip-hop, it may have missed the mark in delivering a comprehensive narrative. The film was criticized for its narrow focus, which seemed to overlook the broader cultural and social influences that shaped the genre. The critic argued that hip-hop's evolution is a complex tapestry woven from various threads, including African, Caribbean, and Puerto Rican Latino cultures, and the documentary's failure to acknowledge this diversity was a significant oversight.  It attempts to erase Puerto Ricans and other Latinos from Hip Hop. Puerto Ricans are co-creators of Hip-hop (see: Sacerdotus: Puerto Ricans Co-Creators of Hip Hop). 

Another point of contention was the documentary's pacing and structure. The critic felt that the film's flow was disjointed, making it challenging for viewers to follow the storyline. The transitions between interviews and historical footage were described as abrupt, which detracted from the overall viewing experience. This makes sense because the director specifically edited comments to make it support his narrative. Things were edited and spliced in a way to present a message the person being interviewed did not mean to convey. Context is missing.

Furthermore, the review criticized the documentary for not providing enough context for the pioneers' contributions to hip-hop. While the film featured interviews with several key figures, the critic argued that it did not delve deeply enough into their stories or the impact of their work on the genre's development.  It has no sources, no evidence is provided, just strategic editing.  

Lastly, the review took issue with the documentary's production values. The critic described the sound editing as subpar, which was particularly disappointing given the subject matter's reliance on music. The visual elements were also called into question, with the critic suggesting that the graphics and archival footage could have been integrated more seamlessly.

In conclusion, the critical review expressed that "Microphone Check" had the potential to be a groundbreaking documentary but was ultimately let down by its execution, content, and politics. The critic emphasized that while the film's intent to honor hip-hop's roots was commendable, it needed a more polished, historically accurate, and inclusive approach to truly do justice to the genre's rich history.   Nasheed failed as a storyteller and armchair historian.  The "documentary" is propagandist revisionist material meant to erase Puerto Ricans and the Bronx from Hip-Hop. Puerto Ricans are described as "guests" in Hip-Hop when in reality this documentary is a squatter in the House of Hip-Hop attempting to claim ownership of it.  It is content similar to that of Black Supremacists who claim Jesus is black and that everyone owes everything to black people. 

Historians will be quick to dismiss this documentary as rubbish. Despite these criticisms, the documentary has sparked conversations and debates, underscoring the ongoing relevance and complexity of hip-hop's narrative in contemporary culture.  Luckily we have Derrick Colon, a self-proclaimed Hip Hop historian and Puerto Rican from the Bronx who is countering Nasheed's claims with evidence and facts even winning a debate against him. It is no surprise that Nasheed's team had Colon's YouTube video critiquing the documentary removed.  What is Nasheed afraid of? 

Those of us who are from the Bronx and grew up in the borough with its hip-hop know the truth. Hip Hop comes from the Bronx. It was co-created by Blacks and Puerto Ricans.  KRS-One and several other pioneers made this clear on several occasions and publicly. It is confirmed by historians and academia. This attempt to divorce Puerto Ricans from Hip-Hop is ridiculous and shows Nasheed's and those who support him in an anti-Latino stance. For some reason, they have a dislike of Puerto Ricans and Latinos in general.  Puerto Ricans are part of the Black Diaspora, to begin with.  Hip-hop just celebrated its 50th anniversary and all scholarships point to the Bronx at Sedgewick Avenue as its birthplace where young blacks and Puerto Ricans gathered at a party to raise money for school supplies.  To state that Hip-Hop originated else where or even in the 1900s or 1950s is laughable. 

"Microphone Check" is a proper title for this clumsy documentary. It is focused on the microphone echoing false narratives and echo chambers from race baiters looking to rewrite history to compensate for their racial insecurities. Only the microphone was checked in order to record and promote nonsense, the opinions presented were not.  

If you are a fan of Hip-Hop or grew up in the Bronx or both, you will be truly disgusted and offended by this documentary. It is just a disaster full of lies and alternative facts.  

12th Sunday of Ordinary Time: Jesus Calms the Storm

The 12th Sunday of Ordinary Time in the liturgical year B offers a profound opportunity for reflection and spiritual growth. The readings selected for this day invite the faithful to contemplate the majesty of God's creation, the depth of Christ's love, and the transformative power of faith.

The first reading from the Book of Job (Job 38:1, 8-11) presents a humbling dialogue where God addresses Job out of the storm. This passage reminds us of the limits of human understanding and the boundless wisdom of the Creator who commands even the seas and the winds. It is a call to trust in God's omnipotence and to find peace in the acknowledgment of our own limitations.

The Responsorial Psalm (Psalm 107) echoes this theme of God's dominion over nature. It speaks of those who have seen the works of the Lord and His wonders in the abyss. The psalmist invites us to give thanks to the Lord for His everlasting love, especially when He rescues us from distress and brings calm to our storms.

In the second reading, St. Paul's letter to the Corinthians (2 Cor 5:14-17) explores the compelling love of Christ. Paul emphasizes that Christ's death and resurrection were for all, urging us to live not for ourselves but for Him. This passage challenges us to view our lives and others through the lens of our faith in Christ, recognizing that in Him, we are a new creation.

The Gospel of Mark (Mk 4:35-41) narrates the familiar story of Jesus calming the storm. This powerful account not only displays Jesus' authority over nature but also addresses the disciples' fear and lack of faith. Jesus' question, "Why are you terrified? Do you not yet have faith?" resonates with us as we face our own storms in life. It invites us to reflect on the strength of our faith and our trust in God's providential care.

These readings collectively offer a rich tapestry of themes for reflection: the awe-inspiring power of God, the redemptive love of Christ, and the call to a faith that overcomes fear. They encourage us to look beyond our immediate circumstances and to trust in the God who stills the waves and guides us to safe harbor.  

Deepening one's faith is a personal and ongoing journey that can be enriched through various practices and disciplines. Here are some practical ways to strengthen your faith:

1. Develop a Consistent Prayer Routine: Prayer is the cornerstone of a strong faith. Setting aside dedicated time for prayer each day helps to maintain a connection with the divine and fosters spiritual growth. Without prayer, a Catholic cannot thrive.  Prayer is the respiration of the human soul and spirit. 

2. Engage with Sacred Texts: Regular reading and study of sacred texts provide deeper understanding and connection. It's not just about reading but also about reflecting on the words and applying them to your life. The Sacred Scripture is the education and mental, spiritual, and psychological food a Catholic soul needs to learn and grow as a Christian. 

3. Participate in Community Worship: Attending Mass and becoming involved in your faith community can offer support and deepen your sense of belonging and belief.  The Church is a community. It is not about the individual only, but the entire Body of Christ.  The Eucharist is the summit of this community. In the Eucharist, we have Jesus truly present who presents Himself as Sacred Food to nourish the body, soul, and spirit

4. Practice Mindfulness and Meditation: These practices can help you become more aware of the divine presence in every moment and cultivate a sense of peace and centeredness.

5. Serve Others: Acts of service are a practical expression of faith. By helping those in need, you can embody the principles of your beliefs and experience the joy of giving. Remember that Jesus is present in others, especially the least of our brothers and sisters. 

6. Seek Fellowship: Surrounding yourself with like-minded individuals can provide encouragement and accountability. Sharing experiences and insights with others can reinforce your faith journey.

7. Embrace Trials as Opportunities: Challenges in life can be seen as opportunities for growth. Trusting in your faith during difficult times can strengthen your resolve and deepen your trust in the divine.

8. Express Gratitude: Cultivating an attitude of gratitude can shift your focus from what you lack to the abundance you have. Recognizing and appreciating the blessings in life can enhance your spiritual perspective.

9. Set Spiritual Goals: Just like any other area of life, setting goals for your spiritual practices can provide direction and motivation. These could include reading a certain number of sacred texts, volunteering a set amount of time, or mastering a particular form of meditation.

10. Attend Retreats or Workshops: These can be powerful ways to focus on your faith, free from the distractions of daily life. They often provide new insights and practices that can invigorate your spiritual journey.

11. Journaling: Keeping a journal of your prayers, thoughts, and spiritual experiences can serve as a tangible record of your faith journey. It can be a source of encouragement and a tool for reflection.

12. Practice Forgiveness: Forgiveness is a powerful act that can release you from past burdens and open your heart to deeper faith.

13. Cultivate Patience: Faith often requires patience, as answers or signs may not come immediately. Learning to wait with a trusting heart is a sign of a maturing faith.

14. Learn from Faith Leaders: Reading books, listening to talks, or attending lectures by respected faith leaders can inspire and inform your spiritual path.

15. Stay Open to Learning: Recognize that your understanding of faith will evolve over time. Stay open to new interpretations and understandings as you grow.

Remember, deepening your faith is a unique process for each individual. It's important to find practices that resonate with you and integrate them into your daily life.  Do not take on too much. Some Catholics want to do everything pray everything and wear everything in regard to sacramentals.  This does the opposite with our faith. Our faith becomes mechanical and based on rituals instead of its true essence, Jesus Christ. 

Jesus is the sole reason we exist and have our being. He is the sole reason we have the Catholic Church, the Sacraments, the Bible, and, so on.  The life we live in often makes it hard for us to have faith and to thrive in it. There are many challenges. Life itself is not the cause nor is it bad. Life is good! However, original sin has tarnished the things in life making it often unbearable. There will be storms.  Storms have their natural purpose of watering the earth, moving old materials (fallen branches, leaves, and so on), cooling the temperature, moving ozone, and overall maintenance of nature. However, they can be scary and can cause harm due to man's construction. 

The storm in the Gospel refers to both a historical event and a metaphorical one.  By metaphorical, we mean that in our lives we often have "storms" that rock our boats, so to speak. They bring us a lot of suffering, stress and anxiety. In many instances, they may force us to question our faith. This is normal. We have a thing we have to suffer in this life.  Recently, my sister was called home by the heavenly Father. She was battling cancer but passed from natural causes.  We were left distraught. She has so much to live for, especially her two beautiful children, one who is autistic. These two children also lost their dad in 2021 so they are now basically orphans.  

It is painful to even write this, but this is the reality now. It is a huge storm my family and I are facing. However, we know Jesus calms the storm. We cannot see what will happen nor can anticipate it but know Jesus is in control. Death affects our faith often enough. We wonder what happened.  We prayed and prayed. Why did a healing not occur? Why do others get better but not her?  We cannot answer this because we are still on earth on a different plane of existence and perception. However, we have faith that God has a plan. He had a bigger purpose.  Jesus calms the storm. He will calm the storms in your life as well. He will not let you be tossed about by the winds, nor drenched in the rain. If the storm knocks you overboard, He will not let you float or drown in the dark rowdy waters. 

As we participate in the Mass and listen to these readings, we are invited to deepen our relationship with God, renew our commitment to live in Christ, and strengthen our faith in the face of life's challenges. Let us embrace the message of hope and trust that these readings convey, carrying it with us into the week ahead and beyond.  

Louisiana Lighting Law: 10 Commandments in Schools

The Intersection of Education and Law: Louisiana's Ten Commandments Mandate

Louisiana has recently passed a law that has sparked a nationwide conversation on the role of historical documents and religious texts in public education. The new legislation requires that the Ten Commandments be displayed in all public school classrooms across the state, from kindergarten through state-funded universities.

This law has been met with a variety of responses, ranging from support to opposition. Proponents argue that the Ten Commandments are not only religious in nature but also hold historical significance as foundational documents of American law and governance. They believe that such displays can provide moral guidance to students and serve as a reminder of the historical underpinnings of the nation's legal system.

On the other hand, opponents of the law raise concerns about the separation of church and state, a principle enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Civil liberties groups have announced plans to challenge the law in court, arguing that it violates the constitutional promise that the government should not favor one religion over another or impose religious practices on its citizens.

The debate is not new; it echoes previous legal battles over religious symbols in public spaces. The Supreme Court of the United States has addressed similar issues in the past, balancing the historical significance of religious texts with the constitutional mandates regarding religion and government.

Louisiana's law also authorizes the display of other historical documents, such as the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance, in K-12 public schools. These documents, along with the Ten Commandments, are to be accompanied by a context statement explaining their historical relevance to American public education and governance.

As the law is set to take effect by the start of 2025, with posters funded through donations rather than state funds, the nation watches closely. The outcome of the impending legal challenges could have far-reaching implications for the interpretation of the First Amendment and the presence of religious and historical texts in public education.

The situation in Louisiana serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue about the role of religion in public life and the enduring question of how to honor the nation's historical heritage while upholding constitutional values. As this conversation unfolds, it will undoubtedly add to the rich tapestry of American legal and educational discourse.

This new law is tricky. While separation of Church and State is NOT found in the Constitution and derives from a letter by Jefferson to a Baptist minister, this law does seem to present a conflict to the idea.  The US Constitution does state that it cannot endorse an official religion.  However, is the display of the 10 Commandments endorsing any religion?  

Law is based on Judeo-Christian principles and philosophies.  There is no denying this. In fact, many courthouses around the United States have images of the Commandments and even Moses. Are they torn down or presented in lawsuits? The answer is no.  These images are allowed to remain as reminders of the origin of the legal system.  

The display of the Commandments in school is a bit different because normally children do not learn the law in public schools. I took paralegal in high school, but this was a special program at the school at the time.  It is no longer offered today to younger students.  That being stated, is it appropriate to display the Commandments in schools?  Some argue that the laws present a sense of morality to students. However, this is difficult to ascertain due to the fact that not every student subscribes to the Commandments of the faiths behind them, namely Judaism and Christianity.  

What about atheist students or Muslims?  What about Buddhists or Pagans?  This is a big problem in a pluralistic society. Moreover, what if some teachers proselytize students into adopting their faith?  This is what led the Knights of Columbus to sue the school system to stop Bible studies. Catholic students in public schools were being proselytized by being taught Protestant heretical biblical views.  

In any event, the motto of the nation is "In God We Trust" and despite many lawsuits, the courts have defended its use. It does not promote religion or faith in God and the "God" in the words can be any deity an American worships.  So this is why the issue is tricky.  Nevertheless, we cannot deny the importance of the Ten Commandments in a historical sense and how it led to the development of the legal system.  As long as this is the intention for the display in schools, then we do not see any issue. However, if school officials use it to preach their personal theologies to students, then that is a problem. 

: [New law requires all Louisiana public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments](https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/us/new-law-requires-all-louisiana-public-school-classrooms-to-display-the-ten-commandments/ar-BB1owTsA)

: [Trump, late night hosts weigh in on Louisiana putting Ten Commandments in schools](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-late-night-hosts-weigh-in-on-louisiana-putting-ten-commandments-in-schools/ar-BB1oF3V9)

: [Louisiana lawmaker behind Ten Commandments bill is eyeing more culture war wins](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/louisiana-lawmaker-behind-ten-commandments-bill-is-eyeing-more-culture-war-wins/ar-BB1oBwlr)

: [Louisiana law requires the Ten Commandments to be displayed in every public school classroom](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/louisiana-law-requires-ten-commandments-displayed-every-public-school-rcna157949)

V is for Vaticana Giustizia

The Vatican and the Case of Archbishop Viganò

In a recent turn of events, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, has been summoned to the Vatican to face charges of schism. This development follows a series of public statements by Archbishop Viganò that have been critical of Pope Francis and the Second Vatican Council, leading to a significant amount of controversy within the Catholic Church.

The charge of schism is a serious one in the Catholic Church, referring to the act of willfully and persistently rejecting the authority of the Pope and the teachings of the Church. The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is responsible for promoting and safeguarding the doctrine on the faith and morals throughout the Catholic world, has initiated an extrajudicial penal process against Archbishop Viganò.

Archbishop Viganò has been a vocal critic of Pope Francis, accusing him of various misdeeds and calling into question his legitimacy as the Pontiff. In a statement, Archbishop Viganò has said, "I consider the accusations against me an honor," and has referred to the Second Vatican Council as an "ideological, theological, moral, and liturgical cancer," with the current Synodal Church being a "metastasis".

The Vatican has not publicly commented on the proceedings, but the situation has sparked discussions among the faithful and observers of the Vatican's internal affairs. The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for the Church, particularly in how it handles dissent and manages its doctrinal integrity.

This case is reminiscent of the trial of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre fifty years ago, who was also accused of schism for rejecting Vatican II. The parallels drawn by Archbishop Viganò between his case and that of Lefebvre highlight the ongoing debates within the Church regarding tradition, reform, and the authority of the Vatican Councils.

The specific charges against Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, as reported by various sources, revolve around the canonical crime of schism. The allegations suggest that Archbishop Viganò made public statements that claimed to deny the fundamental elements necessary to maintain communion with the Catholic Church. These statements reportedly include denying the legitimacy of Pope Francis as the rightful pontiff and outright rejection of the doctrines established during the Second Vatican Council.

The Vatican's Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is tasked with safeguarding the doctrine on faith and morals in the Catholic Church, has initiated an extrajudicial penal process against Archbishop Viganò. If convicted, the consequences could be severe, including excommunication and possibly being removed from the clerical state.

The case has attracted considerable attention, not only because of the high-profile nature of the accused but also due to the implications it may have for the Church's handling of dissent and the preservation of its doctrinal integrity. The trial of Archbishop Viganò is set to be a significant event in the contemporary history of the Catholic Church, as it grapples with issues of tradition, authority, and reform.

Vigano could face excommunication and even laicization if the Vatican court decides against him. Unfortunately, he left a lot of evidence out there on social media for a quick conviction.  He has only himself to blame. Other social media grifters such as Taylor Marshall, Father Z, One Peter Five, and Rorate Caeli have been trying to defend him but with this announcement have become desperate. Even Marshall found it hard to find viewership during his YouTube broadcast and found many are not defending Vigano.  These people are just defending the defensible. We first agreed with Vigano early on. He spoke on things that were truly of concern in the Church. However, when he began attacking the pope, the papacy, Vatican II, the Mass, etc, that was when we realized this man had gone Luther. There was no way to take him seriously.

Schism is not the way to go even if you have huge disagreements with the hierarchy. Dialog and understanding are a must. If not, the Catholic Church becomes something else. It becomes an institution based on your views, misunderstandings, and nostalgia. This is what we see in Marshal and others. They created their own religion. Tradition is not based on what we think is tradition or measured on a specific timeline we want to apply it to.  Tradition is a living organism that develops. Like with all organisms, it is the same creation but just grows and adapts to wherever it finds itself without losing its identity and purpose.  

We need to accept the Catholic Church in her all or just walk away and do our own thing and pray God has mercy on us at our deaths.  The Catholic Church is not ours. We do not decide what to believe and what not to believe. We do not decide who is the valid pope or what is the Mass and what is not. The Catholic Church does. We are just members.  If Marshall, Father Z, One Peter Five, Rorate Caeli, Mike Lewis and others do not believe this, then they need to leave and do their own thing and stop pretending to be Catholics. Maybe the Vatican needs to go after them and all these other armchair grifters who use the faith to make money and promote falsehoods and excommunicate them as well.  Enough is enough. The Church has to be respected.  

As the situation unfolds, many are watching closely to see how the Vatican will navigate this delicate issue and what precedents it may set for handling charges of schism in the future. The trial of Archbishop Viganò is not just about the man himself but about the larger questions of unity, authority, and the future direction of the Catholic Church.

Source:

EXCLUSIVE: Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano Summoned to Vatican to be Excommunicated | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor

Attendite a falsis prophetis - Fondazione EXSURGE DOMINE Ets

Remembering Willie Mays: A Tribute to the 'Say Hey Kid'

Remembering Willie Mays: A Tribute to the 'Say Hey Kid'

Baseball has lost one of its brightest stars, Willie Mays, who passed away at the age of 93. Known affectionately as the 'Say Hey Kid,' Mays was a beacon of excellence in Major League Baseball (MLB), a symbol of the sport's rich history and an inspiration to countless fans and players.

Willie Mays' journey from the Negro Leagues to the MLB is a testament to his indomitable spirit and exceptional talent. He began his career with the Birmingham Black Barons before joining the New York Giants, where he made an immediate impact with his charismatic play and infectious enthusiasm for the game. His move with the team to San Francisco only expanded his legend, as he continued to display his prowess on the field.

Mays' statistics speak volumes about his skill: 660 home runs, 12 Gold Glove Awards, and a place in the top echelons of baseball's all-time greats. But numbers only tell part of the story. Mays was a trailblazer, becoming the first player to join the 300 home run and 300 stolen base club, showcasing a rare combination of power and speed.

Beyond his athletic achievements, Willie Mays was a cultural icon. He broke barriers and served as a role model during a time of significant social change in America. His legacy extends far beyond the diamond; it is etched in the annals of American history, symbolizing progress, perseverance, and the love of the game.

Willie Mays, known as the "Say Hey Kid," is remembered not only for his exceptional talent and statistics but also for the indelible moments he created on the baseball field. Here are some of the most memorable moments that define his legendary career:

1. The Catch - Perhaps the most iconic moment in World Series history, Willie Mays made "The Catch" in the 1954 World Series against the Cleveland Indians. With the score tied in the eighth inning, Mays made an over-the-shoulder basket catch on Vic Wertz's deep fly ball to center field. This play has been hailed as one of the greatest defensive plays ever made.

2. Four Home Runs in One Game - On April 30, 1961, Mays achieved the remarkable feat of hitting four home runs in a single game against the Milwaukee Braves. This extraordinary performance showcased his power-hitting ability and solidified his status as one of the game's greats.

3. Breaking the NL Home Run Record - On May 4, 1966, Mays hit his 512th career home run, surpassing Mel Ott's National League record. This historic moment was a significant milestone in Mays' career and earned him a standing ovation from the Candlestick Park crowd.

4. 24 All-Star Appearances - Mays was selected to 24 All-Star Games throughout his career, a testament to his consistent excellence and popularity among fans and players alike.

5. 12 Gold Glove Awards - Reflecting his defensive prowess, Mays won 12 consecutive Gold Glove Awards from 1957 to 1968. His defensive skills were as much a part of his legend as his batting.

6. 660 Career Home Runs - Mays ended his career with 660 home runs, placing him among the all-time leaders in MLB history. This achievement highlights his longevity and sustained power at the plate.

These moments are just a few highlights from Willie Mays' storied career, which spanned over two decades. His impact on the game of baseball is everlasting, and his legacy continues to inspire future generations of players and fans. Willie Mays will always be remembered as one of the greatest to ever play the game. Rest in peace, Willie Mays. Your contributions to baseball will never be forgotten.

The baseball community has come together to mourn the loss of Willie Mays, with tributes pouring in from all corners. Barry Bonds, Keith Hernandez, and others have expressed their deep respect and admiration for Mays, highlighting the profound impact he had on their lives and careers.

As we reflect on the life of Willie Mays, we are reminded of the joy he brought to the game of baseball. His iconic over-the-shoulder catch in the 1954 World Series, his magnetic personality, and his unparalleled talent have left an indelible mark on the sport.

Willie Mays' passing is a poignant moment for baseball fans around the world. It is a time to celebrate his life, to honor his contributions to the sport, and to acknowledge the void his absence leaves in the heart of baseball. The 'Say Hey Kid' may have left the field, but his spirit will forever roam the outfield, catching every fly ball and stealing every base in the eternal game of baseball.

Rest in peace, Willie Mays. Your legacy will live on, inspiring future generations to play the game with the same passion, dignity, and excellence that you embodied.