Milo Yiannopoulos Pro-Pedophilia?

Infamous provocateur and internet troll, Milo Yiannopoulous is in the news once again.  This time, he is in trouble for what it appears as an endorsement of pedophilia or more proper, hebephilia.  Pedophilia deals with attraction towards prepubescent children while hebephilia deals with an attraction towards kids 11 to 14 years of age.

Milo is scheduled to speak at an event called "CPAC" which is hosted by the American Conservative Union. However, this invitation is up in the air after comments Milo made on a podcast. He said,

“In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationship — those relationships in which those older men help those young boys discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable, sort of rock, where they can’t speak to their parents."

These comments have raised eyebrows and have offended many people. However, some die hard fans of Milo are still defending him. After the comments, a podcaster responds, "It sounds like molestation to me... It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me." Then Milo responds,

"But you knwo what? I'm grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn't give nearly such good head if it wasn't for him." Milo was using a known euphemism for oral sex in the gay community.

Here is a longer cut where Milo Yiannopoulos says that he "is advocating" for legal sex between 13 year olds! & older men. #CPAC2017 pic.twitter.com/1fiuv7TSKs

— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) February 19, 2017

🚨 Breaking: We obtained the #CPAC2017 Milo Yiannopoulos introductory video.

This is a must watch!

Well done @mschlapp. pic.twitter.com/2nA0H9woUX

— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) February 19, 2017

Then on another podcast with Joe Rogan, Milo discussed his relationship with this "Father Michael" who he says molested him as a teenager. The dialog went as such:

Milo: So you're saying you've never seen a 15 yr old girl, at any point in your life, that you thought was hot?

Rogan: Yeah, when I was 15. I'm not retarded dude.

Milo: No, when you were 25 or 30, you've never seen girls you thought were hot?

Rogan: No, I thought they were little kids!

Then the discussion goes on and Rogan calls "Father Michael' a "terrible person." Milo says, "It wasn't molestation."




It seems Milo has hit rock bottom and the point of no return. I will not be surprised if his book and speaking engagements are cancelled, and he will be forced to resign from Breitbart. Only time will tell. The comments are disturbing indeed but show the reality of the LGBT and its fascination with child-adult relationships. Milo's comments are reminiscent of atheist Richard Dawins' comments when he spoke of the molestation he experienced as a child, see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/09/atheist-dawkins-pro-pedophilia.html.

Report: Breitbart Considering Firing Milo #miloyiannopoulos #CPAC #ACU #BreitbartNews https://t.co/ydgtlydJid

— Libertarian Republic (@TheLibRepublic) February 20, 2017

Source:

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/02/19/video-surfaces-of-milo-yiannopoulos-defending-pedophilia-acu-board-reportedly-not-consulted-on-cpac-invite/

The Case of Curt

Edited Image from studiousatheist.wordpress.com/2014/11/28/is-curt-a-pedophile/

Atheists Love Sacerdotus
My popularity among people who pretend to be atheists is pretty much carved in stone, if you will. They go about Twitter; some even have started blogs just to write about me.. well my pseudonym. There is one in particular, a corpulent Caucasian male from Minnesota who has taken upon a fascination with my pseudonym even to the point of misidentifying it with the unsubstantiated designation originating from the suspended troll "Rosa Rubicondior" whose real name is Esther Harrison as demonstrated by  Peter van Montfoort 's search for an image of her online using that name.  How is this knowable?  Well when Jeff (Catholicgadfly) inquired about Peter's "mistake," Peter went silent which speaks volumes to the name Esther Harrison being that of "Rosa Rubicondior." Why else would he do a Google search for that name since that name produced the image he had posted on his atheist blog linking site?

Peter how stupid can you be to conflate "Rosa" with "Esther?" @positiefatheism @DarthNihilus1
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 26, 2014

I digress...

Curt while perpetuating the unsubstantiated claims from Esther has gotten the attention of a young atheist skeptic who has taken to task exposing these fake atheists.  I came across one of his posts where he inquires if Curt is a pedophile. The question is valid and free of defamation because this young atheist skeptic is simply asking the question while providing a link to the tweets (see: https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=%40curt_ames%20manuel) also (https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=%40curt_ames%20manny&src=typd) of Curt showing his fascination with a young Latino boy. This boy is said to have gone to Dodge High school in NYC. However, the school has no record of him.  Moreover, I refer to him as a young boy because since no record of him has been provided showing that he graduated over a decade ago, then we can surmise that he is possibly a teen boy since he is only mentioned as belonging to a high school.

So why Curt?
Being that I hold a degree in psychology from the City University of New York, I have decided to look into this post by this young atheist in a more scholarly fashion.  I still have my notes, books and keep in contact with my professors in order to keep up to date in the field of psychology and my other areas of study.

Manny or Not, Here I come
Whether or not this person (boy Curt is fixated with) is real is beside the point.  The young atheist skeptic is more concerned with the fixation Curt has rather than the name of the person Curt mentions. I too wonder why this Caucasian male is so zealous in his fixation with a child who was mentioned as belonging to a high school.  This fixation can demonstrate an underlying paraphilia such as pedophilia/ephebephilia or perhaps fetishism that Curt is exhibiting subconsciously (Blanchard et.al, 2009).  The fixation is clearly public via Curt's tweets and raises many questions.

While the etiology of the term "pedophilia" normally entails attraction to prepubertal children (DSM IV TR; Kring et.al, p. 403), it can also include adolescents (Marshall, 1997).  Curt's fixation with "Manuel or Manny" of Dodge high school seems to demonstrate this attraction towards an adolescent. Most of his tweets are worded so as to show that he has "power" over "Manuel or Manny." He uses these names to demonstrate a sense of control which is typical of someone who has the paraphilias of pedophilia and ephebophilia.  This control serves as part of sexual gratification and is called Sexual Sadism (Kring et.al, 403).  Moreover, his attempted use of anonymity further details his quest to feel powerful in any situation online.  He believes himself to be untraceable and in doing so is exhibiting grandiose traits which is typical of someone suffering from a personality disorder. See this tweet:

@CatholicGadfly @StudiousAtheist @SCDTVS I can set up an IP address to say I'm literally ANYWHERE in the world with an IP. ; )
— Gingerbread Curt (@Curt_Ames) October 8, 2014

Furthermore, those with these paraphilias are typically Caucasian males over the age of 30.  They display a fascination or strange fixation and interest with children, including teenagers.  Curt's tweets seem to demonstrate this behavior.  He is in fact a Caucasian male and according to his image, looks to be over the age of 30. Moreover, those with these paraphilias tend to be loners, socially awkward in real life.  They use social networks or the internet in order to expound on their paraphilia and to "branch out" and socialize since they cannot do so offline (Durkin, 1997). Many times, they are unemployed.  Curt's Twitter habits seems to indicated that he has a lot of time which may mean that he is unemployed since jobs typically do not allow workers to use company time for person things such as social networking.  Furthermore, people with these paraphilias have hobbies and interests that are juvenile in nature. Curt's own profile has had several images of toys and other "kiddie" imagery indicating that he likes things that are typically for children.  This is an indication of his ego-syntonic traits.  See these images of Curt's profiles and images he has used as an avatar which are "kiddie" in nature:

One of many accounts run by Curt

Curt's main account which often features a "kiddie" avatar

Image of a puppet Curt used as an avatar during the summer 2014

The young skeptic blogger is indeed in the right to inquire about Curt.  Curt clearly seems to be exhibiting the characteristics, both explicit and implicit for pedophilia and ephebophilia. Let me be clear, I am not saying that Curt is one but that he exhibits the traits of one based on his tweets and ego-syntonic traits which are public for all to see. It makes no sense for a Caucasian male over age 30 to be fixated on the identity of a male Latino youth from the Bronx unless there is something behind this, psychologically speaking.  Take this tweet for example:

@RoooPooo @Sacerdotus I'm sure he'll make some altar boy a wonderful husband someday.
— Gingerbread Curt (@Curt_Ames) October 2, 2013

In this tweet above, Curt messaged my old Twitter account with a comment showing that he was thinking of pedophilia and the action of engaging a young boy as a lover.  This is parapraxis at work. His subconscious clearly recalled his understanding and memory of pedophilia and projected it on my Twitter account via what he knows of me: future priest and that altar servers help priests.  The comment is clearly being used to offend or attack me which is typical of psychological projection, or a defense mechanism which denies a trait in oneself and deflects it to another. Moreover, in his first tweets to me he exhibited envy at my academic success indicating he may have an inferiority complex which is comorbid with paraphilias. See these tweets and their conversations threads online: https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=%40curt_ames%20%40sacerdotus&src=typd

      

@GodFreeWorld @Sacerdotus Gotta love the opportunistic vultures who sweep in and claim that every disaster means we need to believe more BS.
— Gingerbread Curt (@Curt_Ames) May 21, 2013

@Sacerdotus @curtfox @LaithG @Americatholic @francosoup Ah, I love a good appeal to authority.
— Gingerbread Curt (@Curt_Ames) July 20, 2013

@curtfox @Sacerdotus @LaithG @Americatholic Anyone who has to tell you about their degrees is either insecure or unable to show intelligence
— Gingerbread Curt (@Curt_Ames) July 20, 2013

Notice that everything is publicly available to view and hence why this young atheist skeptic wrote the post.  He too was labeled "Manny" for simply questioning the nonsense posted on Esther's "Rosa" blog.  Ironically, Curt is now whining and calling on people to falsely report this young skeptic for being a skeptic and asking questions.  With this action we can see that Curt and those who respond to his antics are not atheists.  No atheist (I used to be one) would even censor speech or criticism.  Not taking things at face value is one of the traits of being an atheist.  Real atheists do not believe things without evidence.  It just does not work that way.  Now this is not a "no true Scotsman" fallacy because words are clearly defined as are social scripts such as atheism/atheist.   It seems that Curt has taken on the social script of an atheist in order to mask his inner psychological demons.  Atheism gives the bearer of this ideology the ability to behave in any manner, even if it is anti-social.  This is a perfect cover for anyone suffering from paraphilias or other personality disorders.

It is interesting to note that the group NAMBLA, or "North American Man/Boy Love Association" was founded by an atheist and homosexual named David Thorstad (Kennedy, 1991).  Many people are not aware of this fact.  Atheists many times present themselves as being moral and point at the failings of some priests as evidence that religion encourages pederasty while there are none in their ranks.  This is far from the truth.

The "Case of Curt" is not meant to defame or disparage "Curt_ames" but to expound on the inquiry done by the young atheist skeptic who had the courage to take on two of the most popular atheist caricatures on Twitter: Curt & Esther (Rosa).  In this post I simply present the facts and evidence indicating the comorbidity of any possible pathological condition(s) Curt may be suffering from which only astute thinkers and those who are knowledgeable in psychology can spot.  Based on his Tweets and online behavior as well as his ego-syntonic traits, the signs are present indicating an unhealthy attraction to a young Latino boy or subliminal representation of a human with youthful and ethnic traits.  Further investigation is warranted.            


















Sources:

http://psychiatryonline.org/action/doSearch?AllField=pedophilia

http://www.wikihow.com/Identify-a-Pedophile

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/psychology/pedophiles/7.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/how-to-spot-a-pedophile/

http://neuroanthropology.net/2010/05/10/inside-the-mind-of-a-pedophile/

http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/psychopathology-and-personality-traits-pedophiles

http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia

Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 6 12/2002, pp. 473-477

Psychopathy: Antisocial, Criminal, and Violent Behavior, 1998

Lawrenson, Edward. Warning Signs, Vol. 65, No.1 pp. 66-67, University of California Press, Fall 2011

Blanchard et. al, 2009/2008/revised, "Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-v"  Springer Science Media,LLC

Kennedy, Hubert (1991). "Sexual Hysteria—Then and Now". OurStories (Gay and Lesbian Historical Society of Northern California). pp. 17–18

http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/ajp.156.5.786

Pope Meets Victims

Pope Francis met with six victims of sex abuse by Catholic clergy.  He said in what the media is calling one of the strongest condemnations of the sex abuse scandal:

"Before God and his people, I express my sorrow for the sins and grave crimes of clerical sexual abuse committed against you. And I humbly ask forgiveness, the sexual abuse of minors by priests and other men of the cloth required the church to "make reparation."

This is not the first time a Pope has met with victims of sex abuse. Saint John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI have met with them in the past. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI took on the scandals head on by removing priests and bishops.  Our current Pontiff is continuing to clean up the Church of this filth.

However, groups such as "SNAP are not content with today's meeting. They seem to think that the Pope has power to arrest and prosecute people as secular governments do. The Church can only defrock clerics, they cannot arrest anyone.  Moreover, if civil authorities cannot prosecute these defrocked clerics, then the problem lies with local laws, not the Church.  More needs to be done to either extent statutes of limitations or remove them completely.

In my opinion, more needs to be done to address this scandal. Meetings with victims, drafting charters are not enough.  The Vatican must go after those bishops and heads of religious provinces who transferred abusive priests around knowing they were problematic.  As long as these "leaders" remain in power or in good standing, then any attempt to remedy the scandals via meetings and what not will be seen as "show."
 

Here is the full text of the Pope's words today:

HOLY MASS IN THE CHAPEL OF THE DOMUS SANCTAE MARTHAE
WITH A GROUP OF CLERGY SEX ABUSE VICTIMS
HOMILY OF POPE FRANCIS
Monday, 7 July 2014

The scene where Peter sees Jesus emerge after a terrible interrogation… Peter whose eyes meet the gaze of Jesus and weeps… This scene comes to my mind as I look at you, and think of so many men and women, boys and girls. I feel the gaze of Jesus and I ask for the grace to weep, the grace for the Church to weep and make reparation for her sons and daughters who betrayed their mission, who abused innocent persons. Today, I am very grateful to you for having travelled so far to come here.
For some time now I have felt in my heart deep pain and suffering. So much time hidden, camouflaged with a complicity that cannot be explained until someone realized that Jesus was looking and others the same… and they set about to sustain that gaze.
And those few who began to weep have touched our conscience for this crime and grave sin. This is what causes me distress and pain at the fact that some priests and bishops, by sexually abusing minors, violated their innocence and their own priestly vocation. It is something more than despicable actions. It is like a sacrilegious cult, because these boys and girls had been entrusted to the priestly charism in order to be brought to God. And those people sacrificed them to the idol of their own concupiscence. They profane the very image of God in whose likeness we were created. Childhood, as we all know, young hearts, so open and trusting, have their own way of understanding the mysteries of God’s love and are eager to grow in the faith. Today the heart of the Church looks into the eyes of Jesus in these boys and girls and wants to weep; she asks the grace to weep before the execrable acts of abuse which have left life long scars.
I know that these wounds are a source of deep and often unrelenting emotional and spiritual pain, and even despair. Many of those who have suffered in this way have also sought relief in the path of addiction. Others have experienced difficulties in significant relationships, with parents, spouses and children. Suffering in families has been especially grave, since the damage provoked by abuse affects these vital family relationships.
Some have even had to deal with the terrible tragedy of the death of a loved one by suicide. The deaths of these so beloved children of God weigh upon the heart and my conscience and that of the whole Church. To these families I express my heartfelt love and sorrow. Jesus, tortured and interrogated with passionate hatred, is taken to another place and he looks out. He looks out upon one of his own torturers, the one who denied him, and he makes him weep. Let us implore this grace together with that of making amends.
Sins of clerical sexual abuse against minors have a toxic effect on faith and hope in God. Some of you have held fast to faith, while for others the experience of betrayal and abandonment has led to a weakening of faith in God. Your presence here speaks of the miracle of hope, which prevails against the deepest darkness. Surely it is a sign of God’s mercy that today we have this opportunity to encounter one another, to adore God, to look in one another’s eyes and seek the grace of reconciliation.
Before God and his people I express my sorrow for the sins and grave crimes of clerical sexual abuse committed against you. And I humbly ask forgiveness.
I beg your forgiveness, too, for the sins of omission on the part of Church leaders who did not respond adequately to reports of abuse made by family members, as well as by abuse victims themselves. This led to even greater suffering on the part of those who were abused and it endangered other minors who were at risk.
On the other hand, the courage that you and others have shown by speaking up, by telling the truth, was a service of love, since for us it shed light on a terrible darkness in the life of the Church. There is no place in the Church’s ministry for those who commit these abuses, and I commit myself not to tolerate harm done to a minor by any individual, whether a cleric or not. All bishops must carry out their pastoral ministry with the utmost care in order to help foster the protection of minors, and they will be held accountable.
What Jesus says about those who cause scandal applies to all of us: the millstone and the sea (cf. Mt 18:6).
By the same token we will continue to exercise vigilance in priestly formation. I am counting on the members of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, all minors, whatever religion they belong to, they are little flowers which God looks lovingly upon.
I ask this support so as to help me ensure that we develop better policies and procedures in the universal Church for the protection of minors and for the training of church personnel in implementing those policies and procedures. We need to do everything in our power to ensure that these sins have no place in the Church.
Dear brothers and sisters, because we are all members of God’s family, we are called to live lives shaped by mercy. The Lord Jesus, our Savior, is the supreme example of this; though innocent, he took our sins upon himself on the cross. To be reconciled is the very essence of our shared identity as followers of Jesus Christ. By turning back to him, accompanied by our most holy Mother, who stood sorrowing at the foot of the cross, let us seek the grace of reconciliation with the entire people of God. The loving intercession of Our Lady of Tender Mercy is an unfailing source of help in the process of our healing.
You and all those who were abused by clergy are loved by God. I pray that the remnants of the darkness which touched you may be healed by the embrace of the Child Jesus and that the harm which was done to you will give way to renewed faith and joy.
I am grateful for this meeting. And please pray for me, so that the eyes of my heart will always clearly see the path of merciful love, and that God will grant me the courage to persevere on this path for the good of all children and young people. Jesus comes forth from an unjust trial, from a cruel interrogation and he looks in the eyes of Peter, and Peter weeps. We ask that he look at us and that we allow ourselves to be looked upon and to weep and that he give us the grace to be ashamed, so that, like Peter, forty days later, we can reply: “You know that I love you”; and hear him say: “go back and feed my sheep” – and I would add – “let no wolf enter the sheepfold”.

-http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/cotidie/2014/documents/papa-francesco-cotidie_20140707_vittime-abusi.html








Sources:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/07/pope-francis-catholic-bishops-child-paedophile-abuse-priest-condemn

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/08/world/europe/pope-francis-begs-forgiveness-of-victims-of-sex-abuse.html?_r=0

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/07/07/pope-francis-vatican-sex-abuse-priests-victims/12280567/

http://time.com/2961974/pope-francis-sex-abuse-catholic/

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pope-francis-meets-abuse-victims-begs-forgiveness-church-n149491

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/07/pope-francis-meet-sex-abuse-victims

http://www.ewtnnews.com/catholic-news/Vatican.php?id=10312

Catholic Church vs United Nations

The Catholic Church is in the news again, not for Pope Francis random statements or approach, but for an issue that after a while gets tiring.

As diocesan officials release files on sex abuse in Chicago, the United Nations has been grilling Vatican officials regarding the abuse of children and their response to it.

I will update this post as I learn more, stay turned *




**Update**

Msgr. Charles J. Scicluna who is a former Vatican chief sex crimes prosecutor testified before the Committee on the Rights of the Child.  The committee asked the Vatican officials present about the extent of clergy abuse as well as the measures taken to address the problem.  Moreover, questions regarding any instructions to report or not report instances of alleged abused to the proper authorities were asked.

The Vatican officials had prepared statements and defined for the committee the difference between the Catholic Church and the Holy See.  They added that they did not have the jurisdiction to handle cases which were better suited for the local authorities where offenders originate from. Critics such as SNAP or the Survivor's Network of those Abused by Priests claimed that the Vatican was repeating the same rhetoric as before, which to them was simply claiming that they do not have authority of their bishops or priests and are not responsible.

However, UN officials and other observers were surprised that the Vatican appeared before them and even admitted that more needs to be done.  At one point, Scicluna even said that local prosecutors must go after anyone who obstructs justice, perhaps hinting at bishops who are accused of shuffling abusive priests around and have not been prosecuted.

The UN committee questioned the Vatican due to what they claim is a failure to report to them as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child call for.  The irony in all this is that this same UN institution promote abortion which kills children.  







Source:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/15/catholic-church-hand-over-sex-abuse-documents-chicago-priests

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/church-releasing-sex-abuse-files-chicago-clergy-21537677

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25748952

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/16/world/europe/un-vatican-sexual-abuse/?hpt=wo_c1

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25204805

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/16/22324032-un-slams-vatican-for-efforts-to-cover-up-pedophile-priests-in-sex-abuse-scandal

http://news.yahoo.com/vatican-comes-under-sharp-criticism-sex-abuse-115352398.html