'Sometimes you just cant let it go' - My Response

Twitter troll "Ellif_dwulfe" is at it again.  He is now playing the victim despite evidence showing his malice and abuse against myself and others.  Apparently, after I shot back at his poor attempts to defend Esther who blogs as "Rosa Rubicondior" and who was forced by Facebook to change the name "Rosa Rubicondior" because it is a fake name, he took to his blog to lie about me again.   

A friend sent me the text of the blog post which I will respond to on this post. "Ellif" seems to think that I am some villain out to get him, but he has it backwards.  He has targeted me online for no reason other than because I critique and refute atheism strongly and made "Rosa Rubicondior" look bad after she ran from debating me.  Since then, he has taken to task to be some "online lawyer" for "Rosa Rubicondior" defending her every post using lies even when she has been proven to be a fraud. 

"Ellif's" original content will be blue and my replies will be indented: 

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
Sometimes you just can't let it go
It's odd really, and frustrating.

Sacerdotus Replies

Sounds like a textbook psychology definition of "obsession." 

*What is OBSESSION?
a continual thought, concept, picture, or urge which is experienced as invasive and not proper, and results in significant fear, distress, or discomfort.
Psychology Dictionary: What is OBSESSION? definition of OBSESSION (Psychology Dictionary)
-http://psychologydictionary.org/obsession/

Frustrating?  Yes, distress, anger etc are signs of mental illness (http://www.mindhealthconnect.org.au/signs-mental-health-issue). 

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
A few times I've intended to just stop showing up Sacerdotus lies. His claims about people committing fraud, stealing money donated by others intended for charity or accusing people of posting tweets wanting him dead.

Sacerdotus Replies

What lies?  All "Ellif_dwulfe" has demonstrated is his cognitive bias and misconceptions. Nothing I do online will ever be truthful or honest to him.  He is too caught up in his fantasy world of being as "online atheist" that he is a prisoner of this social script and cannot be objective.  Notice how he never critiques "Rosa Rubicondior's" lies nor even writes about atheist Craig Hicks who killed three young Muslims.  Notice he never condemns "Rosa Rubicondior" for "endangering" "Manuel" but is quick to claim that I endanger others.  Instead, with him, it is all about "Sacerdotus." The claims I have made about atheist fraud, etc are supported by evidence.  To date, no receipts for donations were posted with full information. All we have seen are photoshopped receipts. Without a name, confirmation number and evidence linking the receipt to said blog owner, those images become invalid.  Any receipts posted can be fabricated or even borrowed from someone who actually donated and can passed off as legitimate while using the "I cannot post my full name for privacy reasons" as a front.  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
Well with the threats escalating from Sacerdotus, combined with the claims of knowing my relatives details, then like last time I'll need to consider just how capable of the threats Sacerdotus makes he actually is.

Sacerdotus Replies

How much evidence does he need to know that I am serious about going after trolls?  There is no doubt that I will do what is necessary to end troll abuse.  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
I know that he doesn't know my address, or even my name, since he's never got them right.


Sacerdotus Replies

Oh I surely do.  Hence, his pleas for me to remove it and constant demonstration of anxiety at its revelation.  No one panics over something unless it hit too close to home, no pun intended.  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
I know that he can't prove any of the claims made against him as false because he refuses to do so (for example when "studious atheist / alex atheist" had the "yearbook" proving claims about Sac were false he just posted what appeared to be the cover with my address watermarked on.)

Sacerdotus Replies

All claims were proven as false.  There is no doubt about this.  Even when I go a step further and invite "ellif_dwulfe" and "Rosa Rubicondior" to Sacerdotus Hangouts so we can show each other our passports, both of them slither out of it.  This is because they know that my passport will contradict their lies.  So instead, they prefer to perpetuate their narrative that I am someone they deem I am.  It shows their dishonesty and malicious intent to defame my character and cause confusion among others.  As for a "year book," I have no idea what he is referring to.  I never posted any "year book."  "Studious Atheist" is a young atheist blogger and has nothing to do with me.  He is a friend of a Catholic woman who I also am friends with online.  She can attest to him being someone else since they communicate on a regular basis.  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
But it shows just how desperate he is to be unchallenged, to have his lies appear true. Its odd really if he stuck to promoting catholicsm I likely never would have an issue with him in the first place.

Sacerdotus Replies

This is funny because I am always inviting people to challenge me to a debate.  My own site has a debate tab!  I also started back in March of 2015 "Atheist Open Mic" for the sole reason to give atheists a platform to speak on and challenge me, yet this fool thinks I want to be "unchallenged."  Notice how he prefers that I just "promote Catholicism" as if he has a say of what I do in life. This is because my critiques against atheism bring atheists to think and challenges their cognitive bias.  Therefore, it serves him to desire that I only promote Catholicism and not dissolve the poison of the atheism fallacy.  He knows that I am a threat to atheism.

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
But I've been informed that information he's posted alleging it's mine has led to people getting abuse and harrassment in real life.

Sacerdotus Replies

I would love for him to provide evidence of this.  Perhaps a contact number of the "people getting abuse" so that I can confirm with them.  I doubt he will do this because he is a liar.  If in fact this abuse and harassment is taking place, then he brought it upon them.  But, we all know he is lying. Moreover, he has shown no concern for "Manuel" who may be facing abuse, mockery and other threats from atheists because of "Rosa Rubicondior."  Hypocrisy much?  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
I know he's perfectly willing to post private personal information, that he doesn't care who he hurts whether it's those who disagree with his lies and refute them or the image of his own catholic church.

Sacerdotus Replies

If the posting of it stops a troll from thinking he/she is almighty because he/she thinks he/she is anonymous, then damn skippy I will do so.  Trolls will always use anonymity to post online. This empowers them into thinking they can do anything, even behave in a manner that they do not behave like offline.  They feel they are untraceable and therefore have a false sense of invincibility.  Well, by posting information on where these trolls live etc, this breaks their power trip and hopefully will reduce or completely end their troll hobby.  "Ellif_dwulf" is being dishonest if he thinks the information is posted because the person disagreed with me. That is bloody hogwash!  I welcome disagreement.  My record online shows it.  Information posted is to thwart abusive trolls, not to take revenge against anyone who disagrees with me, that is silly. I have had my public disagreements with fellow Catholics and not once has any of their information been posted.  This is because these fellow Catholics are not trolling or abusing me online. Similarly, I have engaged several atheists in discussions or debates and no information on them was ever posted.  There was no need to because they were civil and did not target me like "Rosa Rubicondior" et all do.  

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
I have a family, and following his showing that he'll post addresses and threats of more, the concerns over how much further he'll take it if I continue I really, really have to stop.

Sacerdotus Replies

Yes he does have a family, a daughter in fact.  He also has offspring with autism.  That being stated, why spend time trolling, defaming and abusing others when it could be spent on time with the family?  Just to be clear, I will take it as far as the law allows me. In fact, I will contact child services in Maidstone to initiate an investigation to see if these children are being neglected due to "ellif_dwulfe's" internet addiction.  (http://www.kscb.org.uk/procedures/child-in-need-chin)    

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
No doubt this will be turned into a victory for him, that I ran scared, that I knew I couldn't defeat him, that he showed I'm a liar and that he beat the "troll".

Sacerdotus Replies

This is a victory not only for me, but for all those who are harassed online by deranged individuals who hide behind cartoon animals or old lady images believing themselves to be untraceable and powerful. I am truly hoping Facebook, Twitter, Google+ etc takes my suggestions seriously in regards to posting IP information in tweets and posts; as well as, preventing the use of VPN on their networks. Today's phone system has caller id. The name and number appears on the recipient's telephone. If this caller id system was implemented on phone lines, then why not on social media?  Granted, some phone line owners may opt to have a private number, but, recipients can also opt to block calls from these private numbers unless they unblock their number.  A system like this on Twitter etc would give a serious blow to trolls from all walks of life.  They will no longer be able to be anonymous. Therefore, they will be forced to behave knowing that a simple tweet or post will show their exact location.

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
To be honest? I don't care. He know's his lies got shown up time and time again. He knows that rather than refute them he had to take steps to intimidate, to release what he hopes is my address.

Sacerdotus Replies

Again, no lies got shown up, just "Ellif_dwulfe's" cognitive bias and misconceptions.  I and many others have refuted "Ellif_dwulfe's" et al claims already. Note, both refuse to go on webcam to further refute the identity they maliciously apply to me in order to discredit me.  This speaks volumes.  Also note that "Ellif_dwulfe" claims the address is not his but uses the word "intimidate" showing subliminally what the revelation of the address is doing to him.  If the address is not his, then he would not be feeling intimidated now to begin with.  If someone spread around that my address is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue then I would not feel intimidated.  This is because this address is not mine so I have nothing to feel intimidated about.  So put two and two together: "Ellif_dwulfe" claims the address it not his but he is intimidated by the posting of it.  Yes, that makes perfect sense...

Ellif_dwulfe writes:
So following that and after seeking legal advice I'm stopping.  I'll stop refuting his lies here, and take the legal route instead.
Posted by Wulfwitch at 11:39

Sacerdotus Replies

I hope he is seeking legal advice because he will need it.  He left enough evidence of his stalking, libel and abuse for me to seriously go after him and have him thrown in prison.  Notice how his Twitter went private again.  I do not like to post what my plans are but he will find out soon the hard way.  

Editor's note:  As expected, "Ellif_dwulfe" only allows "Rosa Rubicondior" to comment on his blog.  Any dissenting comments posted, he removes.  He even labels those who disagree with him or try to correct him "Sacerdotus."  "Ellif" is afraid because he knows that no sane person believes his lies and any comment showing truth would hurt his credibility so he has to censor such comments.  Anyhow, "Rosa Rubicondior" posted these comments:


Rosa Rubicondior writes:
2 comments:

Rosa Rubicondior25 August 2015 at 18:48
Good luck with the legal route. If you need anything from me just let me know.

Rosa Rubicondior25 August 2015 at 19:15
I assume the simpleton is still sending abuse to that unfortunate woman in Vancouver he randomly hit on pretending he had discovered my real name and address. I expect the priest in Suffolk was relieved that he stopped harassing him.

Sacerdotus Replies

This imbecile does not realize that her friend Peter screwed up.  Dutch blogger Peter van Montfoort made a page specifically for "Rosa Rubicondior's" blog posts and other atheists on his site (Positief Atheisme).  He writes a bio for each atheist author and adds links to their writings and a photo.  Keep this in mind.  My Catholic friend found this site and informed me about it. The page had the image of "Esther Harrison."  "Rosa Rubicondior" claims this woman is in Vancouver and is not her but things do not add up.  As noted, Peter adds a photo for each atheist writer and naturally would do the same for "Rosa Rubicondior."  He obviously found the photo of "Esther Harrision." The only way he could have done this is by doing a search for "Esther Harrison" because that was the name "Rosa Rubicondior" gave him.  Why else would he post some lady's picture randomly?  He even admitted based on his wording that he was looking for a photo for "Rosa Rubicondior."  Since he admitted this, then that means that "Rosa Rubicondior" told him that her name is "Esther Harrison."  Since she did not provide a photo, Peter took it upon himself to Google one and found it.     See the proof here:

Here is the exchange between my friend "Catholicgadfly" and Peter.  Notice Peter admits to doing a Google search on his part for "Rosa Rubicondior."  Also note that when "CatholicGadfly" presses the issue as to why he would use a photo of "Esther Harrison" to represent "Rosa Rubicondior," he begins to deflect and avoids answering.  

"Catholicgadfly" questions him on why he would link "Esther" with "Rosa" and he never answered.  Note, that "ellif," "rosa" etc went through all lengths to get "CatholicGadfly" suspended.  Nevertheless, he can still see these tweets despite being suspended.  I will ask him for video confirmation of it to show that these tweets still exist on Twitter's servers despite his suspension.    

@StudiousAtheist No big deal. Simple wrong assumption at Google search on my part. Who would know better what Rosa looks like but Rosa?

— Positief Atheïsme (@positiefatheism) November 21, 2014

Here above is the tweet from Peter stating (based on his wording) that he did Google search on "Rosa" that is how he found the photo of "Esther."  This means that he knew that "Rosa Rubicondior's" real name was "Esther Harrison" and took it upon himself to do a Google search for "Rosa" in order to find a photo of her to add to her bio which he wrote on his blog site.  There is no other logical explanation as to why he would Google on his part for "Rosa Rubicondior" and find an image of "Esther Harrison." The only explanation is that he knew her name as "Esther" and searched, found that image and posted it.

So again, all of this is knowable due to Peter van Montfoort 's search for an image of her online using that name. How so? Well when Jeff (Catholicgadfly) inquired about Peter's "mistake," Peter went silent on this matter and began to deflect (sacramental wine comments etc) which speaks volumes to the name Esther Harrison being that of "Rosa Rubicondior."  He was caught and tried to deflect from answering "CatholicGadfly."  Jeff would then get suspended weeks later.  

Peter Van Montfoort clearly was looking for an image of "Rosa Rubicondior" to put on his blog and used the name "Esther Harrison" in order to find one. Why else would he do a Google search for that name (Esther Harrison) since that name produced the image he had posted on his atheist blog linking site?  The name "Esther Harrison" would  has to be connected to "Rosa Rubicondior" otherwise Peter would not have used it to attempt to find an image to post on his blog highlighting the "Rosa Rubicondior" blog.

Search for "Rosa Rubicondior" produced this image on Peter's site, he removed it now

This was how Peter had his bio for "rosa rubicondior" prior to removing the photo after she was exposed

Now if you notice, "Esther Harrison's" You Tube page here (https://www.youtube.com/user/sayteekay) it has the same botany imagery that "Rosa Rubicondior" loved to use on her Twitter accounts.

If you look at her website which is listed on her Google+ (https://plus.google.com/113720496280048045127/about) you will see that she is an atheist.  See her "about me" here in the screen capture:  

If you look through the "Rosa Rubicondior" blog, she is constantly writing on botany.  See the connection?  The clues are there

1. Peter searches for a photo of "Rosa" on Google but finds a photo of "Esther Harrison" instead meaning that he searched for that name, not "Rosa Rubicondior."
2. Why would he search for "Rosa Rubicondior" under the name "Esther Harrison" if it was not her name?  
3. A search for "Esther Harrison" will produce sites run by her showing images related to botany, just like "Rosa Rubicondior" used on Twitter and writes about on her "Rosa" blog. 
4. "Esther Harrison" is a former theist and now atheist according to the Phoenix' page "about me." 
5. "Rosa Rubicondior" got more defensive after I posted "Case of Rosa Rubicondior."  
6. "CatholicGadfly" was reported and suspended weeks after exposing this information.
7. "Rosa Rubicondior" is known to lie about her name, Facebook recently forced her to change her name "Rosa Rubicondior."  They do this when they know a name is not real.

https://www.facebook.com/rosarubicondior1?fref=nf

In closing, both "Ellif" and "Rosa" are frauds, deceivers and malicious trolls who exist online under the guise of atheism.  They are no such thing.  These are mentally disturbed individuals seeking to have a cheap thrill online by playing a "cat and mouse" game with theists, especially those who are aggressive such as myself. If they were so passionate about atheism then they would not hide using cartoon avatars and fake names.  Like Dan Arel or Richard Dawkins, they would use their real names and photos without issue.  

They both targeted me and they have made a big mistake.  As long as they continue posting lies about me, then I will continue to expose them and seek damages.  However, if they and their friends agree to apologize, recant their lies and remove all content related to "Sacerdotus" which they have written and promoted, then I will consider dropping the matter.  As a Catholic, I am not here to destroy anyone's reputation or put anyone in jail.  My job is about truth, mercy and love.  However, this does not mean that I will sit idle as some jerks seek to discredit me and my work.  I will use the laws and techniques available to put an end to such endeavors and will not stop.  So hopefully "ellif_dwulfe" will convince "Rosa" and his friends to remove all their nonsense and lies, apologize and recant their lies so we can end this once and for all without their lives being destroyed legally.   

Atheist Stalkers Lie Again

It seems my stalkers are still at it again after being warned and exposed.  They are now posting defamatory posts about me again.  The posts seemed to be in response to screenshots I posted of "Rosa Rubicondior's" funny trollish tweets. The screenshots were from her account; main one or a back up that she created when she was suspended. The screenshots clearly show the Tweet ID number showing they can be found via a tweet search.  Claims of them being fabricated are based on desperation and an attempt to become relevant again before the eyes of naive atheists and others who buy into their lies.

In any event, they fell for my trap. They are not smart enough to notice the baiting. :)
I will not refute their lies and expound on this situation here:



Fake Accounts Created by Me Claim Refuted:  

The claim was made that I made fake accounts, yet no evidence is given.  In these blog posts, the names of these accounts are listed and my pseudonym is linked to them as belonging to me.  That makes sense right?  I make a list and then add someone and say those listed are accounts made by that someone so it must be true... give me a break.  No idiot would fall for that nonsense.   

No evidence is given showing said accounts were created by me and are/were run by me. I mean seriously.. in order to do that they would have had to be present in my quarters when I allegedly created them!  It is clear that these accounts belong to them and were made as back ups or possibly even made so as to have something to link to me for malicious reasons.
This is not the first time these two have created other accounts, "Rosa Rubicondior" whose real name is Esther Harrison created several which I have logged here and reported them until they got banned, see:
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/08/warning-twitter-troll-again-with-2.html
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/05/warning-twitter-troll-again.html
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/10/warning-twitter-troll.html
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/09/rosie-permanently-suspended.html

So as you can see, "Rosa Rubicondior" has created more than one account of herself. The one in the tweet screenshots I posted is clearly one of her accounts as well based on her previous behavior of creating multiple serial bulk accounts.

Rosa Rubicondior & Ellif_dwulfe Lie About my Name: 

Futhermore, both "Ellif" and "Rosa" insist on calling me by a name that is not mine despite my academic recorded posted here and another atheist completely destroying their claims using hard evidence.  Both "Ellif" and "Rosa" rely on conjecture to validate their false claims. No actual documents are presented linking me to the person they claim that I am.  Instead, we have screen shots of Myspace profiles that are now defunct as well as newpaper articles that do not even link "Sacerdotus" to any individual at all. Furthermore, an atheist took it upon himself to verify their claims and found them to be bogus.  He contacted the institutions mentioned and learned that no such person attended them.
See:
http://studiousatheist.blogspot.com/2014/07/fraud-rosa-rubicondior-suckers-atheists.html
http://studiousatheist.blogspot.com/2014/12/ellifdwulfe-rosa-rubicondior.html
http://studiousatheist.blogspot.com/2014/11/verifying-claims-by-ellif-rosa.html

The young atheist clearly showed that I am not the person both "Ellif" and "Rosa" think I am; however, he seems to think I am a priest in the United Kingdom due to an email posted on a parish website using my moniker.  I am currently trying to contact that priest who is being confused as myself to get a statement from him verifying that he is not me and I am not him.  Nevertheless, the rest of the information this young atheist posted is strong hard evidence showing that both "Ellif" and "Rosa" lied about my identity.

Ellif_dwulfe & Rosa Rubicondior Can't Answer a Skeptic's Questions:

In an interesting twist, this young atheist posted questions for both "Ellif" and "Rosa" like a true skeptic would, neither of them have answered them.. surprise suprise.  This shows that both "Ellif" and "Rosa" are not capable of answering these questions because their stories will not hold under scrutiny.
See:
http://studiousatheist.blogspot.com/2014/11/follow-up-questions-ellifdwulfe-cant.html

Ellif_dwulfe & Rosa Rubicondior + Confirming Our Identities on Webcam:

Now, I have even challenged both "Ellif" and "Rosa" to join me on either skype or Sacerdotus Hangouts in order to clarify our identities.  I invited them to join me on live so all can watch us show each other our passports.  This would clear who is who and show that the identity they claim is mine is false.  They along with the viewers would see my identity under the United States government.  As expected, both ignored the invitation.  They did this because they know that once I show my passport to them live and others see it, then they will be outed as liars.  So instead, they continue to play out their defamatory narrative while avoiding any attempt to clear the misidentication via webcam and passports.
See where I invite both to webcam live to clear our identities before the world:
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/11/challenge-to-big-bad-online-wulfe.html
http://rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com/2013/06/debate-challenge-to-rosa-rubicondior.html

Sacerdotus Expelled From Seminary Lie:

This claim is one of the strangest and was even refuted by a diocesan priest of the Archdiocese of New York.  "Rosa" claims that I was expelled from St. Joseph's Franciscan Seminary.  The problem here is that this seminary closed in the 1970's
see:   

"Catholic priests, who came to the area ministering to the 19th century German and Irish immigrants, paved the way for establishment of St. Joseph's Seminary. In 1901, the Order of Friars Minor, Franciscans based in Patterson, New Jersey, bought a large boarding house property overlooking Callicoon Depot. There they built an imposing seminary, the largest native bluestone building in the area. From that time until the 1970s virtually every Franciscan in the Province passed through St. Joseph's Seraphic Seminary, either as student, as teacher, or both. Finally closing due to a drop in student enrollment, the complex was sold to the U.S. Department of Labor, which operates it as a Job Corps Training Center."
Source - http://www.visitcallicoon.com/callicoon_history_.html

You can contact the Holy Name Province of the Order of Friars Minor in New York for verification of its closing since it was run by them.  

The Order of Friars Minor of the Province of the Most Holy Name
Provincial Office
129 West 31st St., 2nd Fl
New York, NY 10001-3403
Phone: (646) 473-0265
Fax: (646) 201-9620
E-mail: hnp@hnp.org
http://www.hnp.org/contact-us/

Not only did the seminary close, but it closed before I was born!  So there is no way I could have attended a seminary that closed decades before I was born!  I would have to be a time traveler to do this.

Furthermore, the claim was made that the seminary was St. Joseph's in Yonkers; however, a Catholic priest who studied there during the time "Rosa" claims I went there verified that no one under the name she gives on her blog went there.
See:
http://studiousatheist.blogspot.com/2014/11/oops-rosa-rubicondior-lied-no.html

As you can see, a real Catholic diocesan priest stated that there was no seminarian at St. Joseph's seminary in Dunwoodie, Yonkers with the name "Rosa" and "ellif" give in order to misindentify and slander me.

Donations to Sacerdotus:

Now there are claims that I am a fraud and am scamming Catholics in regards to donations.  Again, no evidence is given for this.  I have made it clear that funds being raised are to maintain and expand the evangelization work I do under the moniker "Sacerdotus."  Catholics and others are not kept in the dark about this.  These funds are not to support me or help me in any form other than this evangelization work. Think about it:  How can I or anyone live off of $35,000?  That would be gone within months due to expenses (rent, taxes, food, clothing etc)  if it was to be used to live off of. Therefore, the claims both "Ellif" and "Rosa" are making are irrational and libelous.  My gofundme.com/sacerdotus page clearly lists what my plans are for the funds.  Recently, I even added a "wishlist" showing the equipment needed to expand "Sacerdotus Radio" and increase the subscription hours.  

Academic Journals 

"Ellif" claims that there is no reason I should ask for funds for access to academic journals and cites my access to my university system.  He is partially correct.  While I do have access to academic journals via my university system, I do not have access to theological journals since my (alma mater) university in New York City offers no theology degrees and is secular. So while I have no problem getting journals related to science, philosophy, history, or even law; I have no access in regards to theological journals, particular, Catholic ones.  So "Ellif" is misinformed and being malicious.

Books 

As for publishing books, everyone knows this is expensive.  Book companies do not pay anything in regards to production so I do not understand where "Ellif" got this false idea from. Book publishing companies pay royalties AFTER a book is published and sells. However, an author is on his or her own in regards to paying for production and so forth especially at the beginner's level.  If book publishing was as easy as "Ellif" ignorantly claims, then everyone would be doing it now to make money.

The Real Honest Person 

Catholics and others donate to my work because they see the fruits, know me personally or have talked to me on the phone or webcam.  They see me at work (evangelization) and know I am the real deal.  I do not sit back and write nosensical posts like "Rosa Rubicondior" does and then herd stupid naive atheists to her site in order to get clicks from ads.  "Rosa" was already outed for fraud by pretending to be a middle man for Oxfam.   

See this post where Oxfam confirms that a donation was just made at the moment of confirmation. "Rosa" had lied and claimed she donated a year before and Oxfam made her look bad and indirectly outed her as a liar.
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/10/atheist-scam-alert.html 

The real fraud here is "Rosa Rubicondior" who was using Oxfam to make money; lied about donating it and was directing atheists to click on ads on her blog via Twitter which is prohibited by adsense, see:
http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/11/atheist-scam-ii-ad-sense.html

My Concerns:

All of this began when I invited "Rosa Rubicondior" to a debate.  She accepted and then began to dilly dally.  Her stalling became abusive leading to her suspension.  Because of this, she has hated me with passion.  "Rosa" had over 7,000 followers on Twitter.  This ia feat that is hard to do.  So, when she got permanently suspended after I contacted Twitter to complain about her abuse, I became public enemy number one to her.  She now spends her time writing libelous posts attempting to discredit me.  If she could, she would probably kill me and possibly even wishes my death.  This is how much this deranged woman hates me.  

Other Trolls: 

"Rosa" is joined by "Ellif" who defends her despite being proven wrong multiple times with hard evidence.   While these people are insignificant, I am concerned that since they love to lie and link people with names that this will hurt the reputation of the people they name as me.  I have ignored their blog posts opting not to ask for their removal out of respect for free speech which is possible, but in light of their continued abuse, then I have no other choice than to have Google, inc et al remove these blog posts as they clearly are in violation of blogger's terms of service. 

"Hate Speech: Our products are platforms for free expression. But we don't support content that promotes or condones violence against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity, or whose primary purpose is inciting hatred on the basis of these core characteristics. This can be a delicate balancing act, but if the primary purpose is to attack a protected group, the content crosses the line. 

Violence: Don't threaten other people on your blog. For example, don't post death threats against another person or group of people and don't post content encouraging your readers to take violent action against another person or group of people. 

Harassment: Do not harass or bully others. Anyone using Blogger to harass or bully may have the offending content removed or be permanently banned from the site. Online harassment is also illegal in many places and can have serious offline consequences. 

Copyright: It is our policy to respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement. More information about our copyright procedures can be found here. Also, please don't provide links to sites where your readers can obtain unauthorized downloads of other people's content."   Source:  https://www.blogger.com/content.g?hl=en 

Closing: 

Both have demonstrated their mental illness publicly and stalking tendencies.  How are they stalking you might ask?  Well, both have blocked me on Twitter and Google +, so in turn I blocked them.  However, as you can see on their blog sites, they still manage to get screenshots of my tweets and google+ posts indicating that they are using other accounts to stalk me.  This is disturbing indeed. Only a sick person would resort to such criminal behavior. 

I have contacted Kent and Oxfordshire police regarding these individuals and will do so again.  There is enough evidence indicating their cyber harassment, defamation, libel, stalking and malicious intent to harm my character and my work.  If they want a fight, then they have one.  I will win this one because the evidence is on my side and I have many witnesses (both theist and atheist) of their abuse, defamation, libel, threats and stalking.     

Please ignore these mentally ill demagogues.  Their only intent is to defame and discredit me using lies and conjecture.  As I have demonstrated above using multiple sources, their claims have been destroyed with hard evidence.  Moreover, I still wait for them to join me live on Sacerdotus Hangouts via You Tube to further destroy their attempt to pin a high school kid's name to me via the display of my US passport.

Block and Report the Trolls:

Here are their accounts on Twitter.  Please block them and report them to Support using their form:
https://support.twitter.com/forms/abusiveuser 

If you block them, they will have no audience to target.  

TwitterAccounts used by "Rosa Rubicondior"

 @R0saRub1c0nd10r

@RubicondiorRosa 

Google +

https://plus.google.com/109946957456079302919/posts?hl=en 

Accounts used by "Ellif_dwulfe"

@Ellif_dwulfe
@ellif_dwulfe2
@wulfinuk
@sacerdoofus

Google +

https://plus.google.com/+EllifDWulfe/posts 

These are other accounts that join them in their stalking and harassment.  Please block and report them as well:

Jeremy Murch: 

@darthnihilus1 - was permanently suspended August 6, 2015
@Th0mas_Anders0n
@TruelyOMEGA

Google+
https://plus.google.com/100369177467384682856/posts 

@Curt_ames - he has other accounts as well

@freeatheism - was warned by Twitter in March 2015

Google +
https://plus.google.com/118428795095668332719/posts 



These accounts engage in targeted abuse which are one-sided as Twitter rules prohibit.  They organize just for the purpose of defaming and harassing me as well as those who befriend me. The individuals behind these accounts create serial bulk accounts for the aforementioned purpose and to stalk my every online action so as to fabricate new stories in order to slander me.

In closing, these individuals are liars and clearly see me as a threat as evident from the length they go through in order to discredit and slander me. Catholics and other Christians know me well, so do many atheists. Unfortunately, there are some atheists who out of a sense to feel as "part of the group," blindly believe these liars. I remind these atheists that skepticism is a staple in the atheist person. Without it, then you are just another "believer" of things without evidence.

Do not jump to believe lies posted about "Sacerdotus." Ask for hard evidence. Notice that none of these trolls do not even have a photo of me, yet they claim to know my full name, schools, seminaries etc. This is a clear red flag that their information is bogus. I warn you though.. any attempt to question these disturbed individuals will bring them to accuse you of being a sock puppet of mine. This is how they protect their lies by claiming that those who challenge the validity of their claims are really me using a different account. They will insist on this lie and will never even go on webcam to prove  the distinct identities of accounts in question in real time. Again, they are liars and will face the consequences for their libel.

Spike in Hits!

On January 9, 2015 my blog was engulfed with visitors. Thank you!  I had not posted in a while and was wondering why there were so many visits.   Also, some of my Twitter friends have been targeted for promoting me and were suspended.  However, despite this, my blog is still visited even without manual promotion.  

It seems that the plot by some crazy fake atheists on Twitter is backfiring.  There are a few blog posts and tweets out there slandering me and what not. Well, that attention is bringing me hits which is probably what they did not intend.  :)

Wulfe Is Scared

It has been over 3 days and atheist troll @ellif_dwulfe has not posted on the rationallyfaithful.wordpress.com comment notifying me that he has accepted my invitation.  Like all the other atheists, he has run away like a coward.  See my invitation: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/11/challenge-to-big-bad-online-wulfe.html

It's clear that this disturbed individual just wants to slander me on his blog, side with "Rosa Rubicondior" despite evidence showing this person is a liar etc.  I ask all Catholics and people of faith to report @ellifd_wulfe.  Just ignore the troll.  He's not worth it and obviously is mentally disturbed. 

I will see what I can do with him based on the law.  I do have his location:

Challenge to the "Big Bad" Online Wulfe

It seems the Twitter troll @ellif_dwulfe is continuing his obsession with me.  See: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/10/one-of-those-days.html  Ever since I had the @sacerdotus account, this guy would constantly message me offering all kinds of counter arguments that made no sense. He gave the impression that he had to be "right" in everything. When I refuted his ideas, he would get upset with me and call me dishonest which made no sense to even do so.  He now started a blog focused solely on me which perpetuates the delusion that I have multiple accounts imitating the nonsense and tactic of "Rosa Rubicondior."  Like the latter, he offers no evidence for this.

He posted the tweets below on Twitter which I was made aware of and decided to challenge him on them and his overall hatred towards me.  I invite this "blind wulfe" to join me on Sacerdotus hangouts and argue with me the many points he cowardly posts on blogs and tweets.  If he is a mature adult, he should have no problem confronting me on a live platform and present his arguments and reasons why he hates me so much.

I will respond to these ridiculous tweets briefly here, but challenge Ellif to come on Sacerdotus Hangouts to talk man to man.  If he refuses, then I will take it as cowardice on his part and an inability to back up his claims.  We then can all ignore this character as nothing more than an angry person seeking attention and significance by using my popularity upon with to ride on.

In order to accept this challenge, Ellif has to accept by posting his acceptance at: http://rationallyfaithful.wordpress.com/general-comments/

Emails, tweets, voice messages, text messages, blog posts and the like will not be accepted.  I also ask Ellif not to use my material on his blog without written consent as my blog clearly states.  

I hope Ellif will be brave enough to face me live.

Why is Sacerdotus/catholicgadfly so afraid of #atheists he wants them silenced on Twitter? https://t.co/dr0uzNfXYL http://t.co/kHo78pmQja
— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 20, 2014

Sacerdotus comments:
I can't speak for Catholicgadfly, but I have no fear of anything and my constant invitation to debate is testament to this.  No real atheist is to be silenced, only the abusive trolls... big difference.

#sacerdotustell Loves calling out fallacies, just not enough to learn what the fallacies are and call them out correctly
— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 19, 2014

Sacerdotus comments:
He fails to show these fallacies.  Based on his writing, it seems Ellif is not well grounded at the college level, therefore, he has no authority to spot fallacies because part of a college education requires this skill.

#sacerdotustell Claiming to have evidence, when challenged to provide refuses saying they'll post "later" when they have more.
— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 19, 2014

Sacerdotus comments:
No one has ever challenged me to this.  If he is referring to an email he sent months ago, then I clearly stated that I was working on a series of post, the first part which I posted.  I made it clear to him that it would be silly to send the posts to him when they will be posted piece by piece on this blog.

Sacerdotus/catholicgadfly evades challenge to provide evidence of god he claims to have http://t.co/kff9fGLtxn
— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 19, 2014

Sacerdotus comments:
AGAIN: No one has ever challenged me to this.  If he is referring to an email he sent months ago, then I clearly stated that I was working on a series of post, the first part which I posted.  I made it clear to him that it would be silly to send the posts to him when they will be posted piece by piece on this blog.




UPDATE:  Ellif ran off as expected.  However, I do have his IP address:

Sacerdotus Was Expelled!

Our resident trolls never stops at anything to try to defame me. After I forced her to donate to Oxfam yesterday ending a year long lie, she is now promoting a new post with lies about me.  Now "Rosa Rubicondior" is claiming that I was expelled from St. Joseph's Seminary in Yonkers, New York. First she said that I was at St. Joseph Franciscan Seminary which closed in 1977 and would have made me into a time traveler because I was born way after 1977.  Now she is using St. Joseph's Seminary.

Ever since she ran away from debating me (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mw5C0LlkcY ) and I revealed her and her fraudulent activity, her hate for me gotten the best of her.  She will  make up anything in order to defame me.

The truth?  How can I be expelled from a seminary I never went to?  Father Rosado of the Archdiocese of New York was kind enough to confirm this publicly.  He studied at that seminary around the time "Rosa Rubicondior" claims I attended.

Priest student from St. Joseph’s seminary confirmed no Manuel studied there

Rosa Rubicondior: Manny Scores Another Own Goal! http://t.co/n6bH6VcsfO via @sharethis

— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 2, 2014

https://twitter.com/Ellif_DWulfe/status/529003813466673152

@CatholicGadfly their is currently no St. Joseph Franciscan Seminary. Just ignore the poorly written blog. It's not worth your time.

— Father Rosado (@FatherRosadoNY) November 3, 2014

https://twitter.com/FatherRosadoNY/status/529090914468511744

@CatholicGadfly Hi no Emmanuel in my time at Dunwoodie.

— Father Rosado (@FatherRosadoNY) November 3, 2014

https://twitter.com/FatherRosadoNY/status/529086245411254274

You can also contact the seminary and ask, I really do not care.  I can guarantee you that they will confirm that I nor the guy "Rosa Rubicondior" claims I am, never went there.

St. Joseph's Seminary
201 Seminary Ave.
Yonkers, NY 10704
P: (914) 968-6200
F: (914) 376-2019
E: sjs@dunwoodie.edu

Only a moron would buy into "Rosa Rubicondior's" lies.  It seems Twitter trolls "Ellif_dwulfe" is so gullible that he believes these lies.  Funny how he is quick to question me, other Catholics and even a fellow atheist, but never questions "Rosa Rubicondior" or how she got the information regarding the expulsion of a seminary student.  Do these two people really think that information like this is made public by any school?  There is such a thing as RIGHT TO PRIVACY.    

Catch the Wolf

As you may know, there are a few troll accounts who have taken on the task to post lies about me. Instead of engaging them in arguments, I ask my readers and supporters to report these people to Twitter, Blogger, Wordpress and the Police.  

In light of the United Kingdom's Malicious Communications Act, I decided to proceed with the matter legally.  I contacted Kent Police in regards to Twitter account Ellif_dwulfe asking how to pursue further action.  I have also contacted the police in the area of "Rosa Rubicondior" regarding her abuse and slander.

Please flood Kent police with your concerns over this abusive person Ellif_DWulfe.  Abusive cowards should not be free to use services such as blogs, Twitter, Facebook in order to post defamatory and libelous content.  Let's stop this:

Regarding Ellif_DWulfe, contact: http://www.kent.police.uk/WebFeedback/contactusSubmit.do



This is what I wrote to them:

Hello, in light of the United Kingdom's law regarding
cyber bullying and abuse (Malicious Communications
Act), I would like to report/know how to report an
abusive blogger who is a citizen of your nation. These
are the blog posts he has written defaming me and other
friends:

http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/dont-feed-
troll-its-addictive.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/one-day-of-
sacerdotus.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/sacerdotusca
tholicgadfly-scam.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/sacerdotus-
debate-rules.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/the-
sacerdotus-self-exposed.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/sacerdotus-
spite-and-anger.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/sacerdotus-
summary.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/atheist-
dilemma-vi-and-stonehenge-lets.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.com/2014/11/sacs-ongoing-
oxfam-saga.html?spref=tw
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.com/2014/10/twitter-
suspension.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/sacerdotusca
tholicgadfly-scam.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/sacs-
ongoing-oxfam-saga.html
http://theblindwulf.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/mute-on-
lies.html

He also uses the Twitter accounts:
https://twitter.com/Ellif_DWulfe
https://twitter.com/Ellifdwulfe2
https://twitter.com/wulfinuk

This person is also shown in this video
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5p6ax7Mbhc) with his
friends using video conferencing.  However, only his
voice can be heard, but you can contact his friends to
find out who he is. 

Friends listed in the youtube video:
N'Eligahn: @NEligahn
Mishy: @CrunchieMishy
Poe: @MightyPoe
Bindi: @kaermorhenworks
GSP: @Gear_Stik_Prod

I have never met this person nor know of him.  He
insists on posting libelous posts on me in an attempt
to discredit me and bring upon me doubt from others who
befriend me online.

In light of this abuse, I would like Kent police to do
an investigation on this person.  I would like to
pursue this matter further.  However, I am not in your
nation so you would have to provide details as to how I
can proceed with charges as this individual is clearly
engaging in abuse, defamation, libel and cyber
bullying.  I hope to receive a response to this email,
cheers!  

Friends of "Ellif" from Youtube video

UPDATE November 10, 2014 - An official from Kent's police department contacted me today and informed me on what to do to proceed with this case against this abusive person.  I plan to follow through to the best of my ability in order to stop this person and any other who use the internet to slander and abuse others.  In the mean time, please continue to contact Kent police and document for me any mention of "Sacerdotus" that is done in order to defame, harass and abuse my character.  

UPDATE November 15, 2014
According to Kent police, cyberbullying is described as:

"Cyberbullying is when a person uses technology i.e. mobile phones or the internet (social networking sites, chat rooms, instant messenger), to deliberately upset someone.
It can happen any time of day and occur on a large scale and speed, due to the nature of the technology."


United Kingdom's Laws 

Protection from Harassment Act (1997)
Malicious Communications Act (1988) 
Communications Act (2003) 
Obscene Publications Act (1959)
Computer Misuse Act (1990)