Gay Pride Mass at Stonewall

 

Gay Pride Mass at Stonewall: The Smell of the Sheep and the Medicine of Mercy

In the heart of New York City’s Greenwich Village, where the Stonewall Inn stands as a landmark of resistance and identity for the LGBTQ+ community, a Catholic Mass was celebrated amid Pride celebrations. For many Catholics, the optics can seem jarring—rainbow flags, secular Pride events, and the ancient liturgy sharing the same space. Questions arise: Is this appropriate? Does it compromise the Church’s teaching? Yet as I reflect on it, two things come immediately to mind: the smell of the sheep and the unmistakable example of Jesus eating with sinners.

Pope Francis has often spoken of pastors who carry “the smell of the sheep.” It is a vivid image of a Church that does not remain distant or antiseptic, but one that goes out to where people actually are—flawed, searching, wounded, and sometimes far from the ideal. The Good Shepherd leaves the ninety-nine to find the one lost. He does not wait for the sheep to clean itself up perfectly before approaching. He draws near first.

Jesus Himself modeled this scandalous closeness. The Pharisees grumbled because He ate with tax collectors and sinners. They saw compromised optics; He saw souls in need of mercy. “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick,” He said. Time and again, Christ’s ministry was marked by table fellowship with those society judged most harshly. He did not begin with condemnation but with presence, healing, and invitation to conversion. The Church exists to continue that mission.

This brings us to the heart of why such a Mass matters, even when it invites criticism. Pope Francis captured it powerfully in Evangelii Gaudium (2013), paragraph 47:

> “The Eucharist, although it is the fullness of sacramental life, is not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak.”

The Church is not a museum for saints but a field hospital for the wounded. In a world full of division, isolation, and moral confusion, the Mass at Stonewall represents an attempt to bring the medicine of the Eucharist precisely where people may feel most alienated or most in need. It is an act of accompaniment—meeting people in their reality rather than demanding they achieve perfection before entering the door.

Critics will rightly note that the Church’s teaching on sexuality and marriage has not changed and cannot change. Mercy without truth is sentimentality; truth without mercy is harsh legalism. The genius of the Catholic approach is to hold both in tension: clear doctrine paired with radical, personal outreach. Ministering to those who experience same-sex attraction does not mean endorsing every aspect of Pride culture. It means witnessing to the dignity of every person made in God’s image, offering the sacraments as strength for the journey, and trusting the Holy Spirit to lead hearts toward holiness over time.

The field hospital does not ask the bleeding soldier for his papers or demand he recite the full catechism before bandaging his wounds. It stops the bleeding, nourishes the body, and then begins the deeper work of healing and conversion. That is the logic of evangelization. That is the logic of the Incarnation—God entering our messy reality rather than calling down from afar.

As Catholics, we are called to be both faithful to revelation and generous in mercy. Events like the Pride Mass at Stonewall test that balance. They may look messy. They may invite misunderstanding. But they also echo the Lord’s own table fellowship and Francis’s call for a Church that smells like the sheep—close to the people entrusted to her care.

In the end, the Eucharist is not a reward for arriving at the destination. It is food for the journey. May more souls, whatever their struggles, find nourishment there, encounter Christ in His mercy, and be drawn ever closer to the fullness of life He offers. 

That is the purpose of the Catholic Church: to seek the lost, heal the wounded, and proclaim the Gospel to every person—starting right where they are.

Saint Charles Lwanga and Companions: Martyrs for Purity and Faith

Saint Charles Lwanga and Companions: Martyrs for Purity and Faith

In the late 1800s, in the Kingdom of Buganda (modern-day Uganda), a young king named Mwanga II ruled with cruelty and unchecked desires. Mwanga, known for his dissolute lifestyle, repeatedly made sexual advances—specifically homosexual ones—toward the young pages (teenage boys and young men) serving in his royal court.

Among these pages were converts to Christianity, taught by French missionaries. They learned that their bodies were temples of the Holy Spirit and that sexual acts outside of God's design—including sodomy—were grave sins. Led by Charles Lwanga, a strong, athletic, and natural leader who had been baptized in 1885, the Christian pages firmly refused the king's demands.

Charles and his predecessor, Joseph Mukasa, went further: they actively protected the younger boys from the king's predatory behavior, shielding them and encouraging them in the faith. This resistance enraged Mwanga, who saw Christianity as a threat to his absolute power and personal vices. He viewed the Christians' fidelity to Christ as defiance against his authority.

In 1885–1886, the persecution intensified. Mwanga ordered the execution of many Christians. On June 3, 1886 (Ascension Thursday), Charles Lwanga and 21 companions—most of them teenagers, including the young Kizito—were marched to Namugongo. They were bound, wrapped in reed mats, and burned alive at the stake.

As the flames rose, these brave young men prayed, sang hymns, and encouraged one another. They could have saved their lives by denying their faith or submitting to the king's sins. Instead, they chose martyrdom. Charles Lwanga himself is said to have baptized some of the boys on the way to their deaths. Their final words echoed courage: "Till death!" they declared when asked if they would remain Christians.

Why does this story matter?  

St. Charles Lwanga and his companions did not die merely for being Christian—they died because they refused to commit grave sexual sins, specifically by yielding to homosexual acts demanded by the king. They treasured chastity and obedience to God over earthly comfort, power, or survival. In an age when sexual license is often celebrated, their witness stands as a powerful reminder: true freedom is found in fidelity to Christ, even unto death.

Today, the Church celebrates their feast on June 3. They are patrons of youth, converts, and those fighting for purity. Their blood helped plant the seeds of a vibrant Catholic Church in Africa that continues to grow today.

St. Charles Lwanga and Companions, pray for us!  

Pray for courage to stand against sin. Pray for purity in a confused world. Pray that we may love Christ more than life itself. 🙏

“These martyrs... died for their Christian faith—and, more specifically, because they refused to take part in homosexual activities.” (Historical accounts)

Priests on Grindr: The Portuguese Parish Scandal and the Crisis of Homosexuality in the Priesthood

Priests on Grindr: The Portuguese Parish Scandal and the Crisis of Homosexuality in the Priesthood

The Catholic Church in Portugal is in the news, but not for the upcoming anniversary of the Fatima apparitions on May 13.  A disturbing report has emerged from northern Portugal, highlighting ongoing challenges within the Catholic Church. A complaint filed with the Polícia Judiciária in Porto alleges that several priests from the dioceses of Porto and Braga participated in gay orgies organized through the dating app Grindr. These encounters reportedly took place in parish houses, motels, and other locations, involving secret WhatsApp groups for coordination.

According to the whistleblower, weekly "men-only" meetings featured activities described as orgies where "almost anything goes." Parish properties were allegedly used as venues, raising serious questions about the stewardship of sacred spaces and the fidelity of ordained ministers. This scandal is not isolated. Similar stories have surfaced in the U.S. and Vatican, underscoring a persistent problem: active homosexuality among some clergy.

 What Is Grindr?

Grindr is the world's largest social networking and hookup app for gay, bi, trans, and queer individuals. Launched in 2009, it uses GPS location data to show nearby users, allowing quick profiles, messaging, and meetups. It is primarily known as a tool for casual sexual encounters rather than long-term relationships. With millions of monthly active users, its design facilitates immediate, anonymous connections based on proximity.

For priests bound by vows of celibacy and chastity, using such an app represents a profound contradiction. It turns devices meant for pastoral communication into tools for arranging sexual activity, sometimes on Church property.

 The Broader Problem of Homosexuals in the Priesthood

This Portuguese case points to a deeper crisis. Studies and reports over decades suggest a disproportionate presence of men with homosexual inclinations in seminaries and rectories, correlating with abuse scandals. While most priests live faithfully, a subculture of active homosexuality undermines trust, morale, and evangelization. Victims of clerical abuse have often been adolescent males, highlighting patterns linked to unresolved same-sex attractions rather than simple "pedophilia."

The issue harms the Church's credibility. Laity expect priests to model sacrifice and self-mastery. When ordained men pursue same-sex hookups, it scandalizes believers, drives away vocations, and fuels secular mockery. It also distracts from the heroic work of faithful priests serving in difficult missions.

 Church Teaching and Laws on Admission to the Priesthood

The Catholic Church's official teaching is clear and consistent. Homosexual acts are "intrinsically disordered" and contrary to natural law, as stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 2357-2359). All persons, regardless of inclination, are called to chastity. Priests take a solemn vow of celibacy, promising complete sexual abstinence.

On admission to holy orders, Vatican documents are explicit. The 1961 instruction Careful Selection and Training of Candidates barred those with "evil tendencies to homosexuality or pederasty." The pivotal 2005 document from the Congregation for Catholic Education, approved by Pope Benedict XVI, states: "The Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practise homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called 'gay culture.'" Such tendencies are seen as gravely hindering proper relational maturity for priestly ministry.

This builds on earlier norms distinguishing transitory from deep-seated tendencies. Only those who have overcome issues through grace and discipline might be considered in rare cases. The 2016 The Gift of Priestly Vocation reaffirmed this ban.

Despite these rules, implementation has been inconsistent. Some dioceses and religious orders have admitted candidates contrary to guidelines, often influenced by cultural pressures or lax formation. Recent developments, like 2025 Italian bishops' guidelines (Vatican-approved for trial), allow more nuance for openly gay men committed to celibacy, but they still reference the 2005 prohibitions.

The Church's law prioritizes the common good of souls. Priesthood demands spousal fidelity to the Church as Bride of Christ. Deep-seated same-sex attraction complicates this iconography and the priest's role as spiritual father. Faithful enforcement of these norms protects both candidates and the faithful.

 A Call for Renewal

The Portuguese scandal demands swift investigation, accountability, and reform. Bishops must enforce vocational screening rigorously, promote authentic chastity formation, and purge networks that tolerate double lives. Laity should pray for holy priests and support those living their vows with joy.

This is not about hatred but truth. The Church offers mercy and healing to all struggling with sexuality through sacraments and support. But ordination is not a right—it's a calling requiring conformity to Christ. Ignoring clear teachings invites more scandals and erodes the priesthood's sanctity.

True renewal begins with fidelity to the Gospel and Tradition. Only then can the Church credibly proclaim the beauty of celibacy as a gift, not a burden.

This post draws from public reports and Church documents for informational purposes.

 Relevant Links:

- Complicit Clergy Report on Portuguese Scandal: https://www.complicitclergy.com/2026/05/11/86628/ 

- Infovaticana Coverage: https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/05/11/accusations-of-clandestine-sexual-encounters-implicate-priests-from-northern-portugal/ 

- Vatican 2005 Instruction on Homosexual Tendencies: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20051104_istruzione_en.html 

- Catechism on Homosexuality: https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P85.HTM 

- Grindr Official Site (for reference): https://www.grindr.com/ 

Pope Leo XIV's Comments on German Bishops and Same-Sex Blessings: A Call for Unity in Christ Amid Ongoing Tensions

Pope Leo XIV's Comments on German Bishops and Same-Sex Blessings: A Call for Unity in Christ Amid Ongoing Tensions

On April 23, 2026, aboard the papal plane returning from a pastoral visit to North and Central Africa, Pope Leo XIV addressed a pressing issue in the Catholic Church: the push by some German bishops, notably Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich-Freising, to formalize blessings for same-sex couples and those in irregular situations. His remarks, delivered in response to a journalist's question, have sparked widespread discussion, offering insight into his vision for Church unity, pastoral care, and fidelity to doctrine.

Pope Leo XIV, the first U.S.-born pontiff (born Robert Francis Prevost in Chicago), succeeded Pope Francis in May 2025. His comments reaffirm key elements of the 2023 Declaration Fiducia Supplicans while firmly rejecting formalized rituals that could blur the line with sacramental marriage. This intervention highlights the ongoing tension between pastoral accompaniment and doctrinal clarity, particularly in light of Germany's Synodal Way.

 Background: Fiducia Supplicans and Its Reception

To understand Pope Leo's statements, we must revisit Fiducia Supplicans: On the Pastoral Meaning of Blessings, issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on December 18, 2023, and approved by Pope Francis. This document distinguishes between liturgical blessings (reserved for what aligns with God's will, such as sacramental marriage between one man and one woman) and spontaneous, pastoral blessings.

The declaration states that "couples in irregular situations and same-sex couples" may receive informal blessings. These are not to resemble a wedding rite, nor should they occur in prominent liturgical settings like before an altar. Instead, they express God's mercy and the Church's closeness to individuals seeking help, without endorsing or altering the moral teaching on marriage and sexuality. A sample prayer might invoke health, peace, and guidance to live according to God's will.

Fiducia Supplicans reaffirms traditional doctrine: "The Church does not have the power to impart blessings on unions of persons of the same sex." It emphasizes that blessings for individuals or couples in such situations are acts of supplicating trust (fiducia supplicans), asking God to enrich, heal, and elevate what is good while calling for conversion.

The document's reception was mixed. Many welcomed its pastoral tone as an extension of Pope Francis's emphasis on mercy and inclusion ("todos, todos, todos" – all, all, all). However, bishops' conferences in Africa and elsewhere expressed reservations, fearing confusion or cultural clashes. In contrast, progressive voices in Europe, especially Germany, saw it as a green light for more structured approaches.

 The German Context: Synodal Way and Recent Developments

Germany's Catholic Church has long grappled with declining membership, secularization, and calls for reform. The Synodal Way (Synodaler Weg), launched in 2019 following abuse scandals, brought bishops and lay delegates together to discuss power structures, sexuality, women's roles, and more. In March 2023, participants voted overwhelmingly (176-26 with abstentions) in favor of "blessing ceremonies for couples who love each other," including same-sex couples.

This led to pastoral handouts and diocesan guidelines. Cardinal Marx's recent decision to issue a guide in Munich-Freising for blessings of people in relationships outside sacramental marriage—including same-sex couples—prompted the question to Pope Leo. The guide aims to provide principles for priests, framing blessings as strengthening love and invoking God's help, but critics argue it veers toward formalized rites.

Earlier Vatican interventions had already addressed this. In 2023-2024, Rome warned the German bishops against creating official rituals. Pope Leo referenced these communications directly: "The Holy See has made it clear that we do not agree with the formalized blessing of couples, in this case homosexual couples... beyond what was specifically... allowed for by Pope Francis."

Germany's approach reflects broader debates. Some bishops and theologians argue for greater inclusion to stem the exodus of young people and align with societal values on equality. Others, including more conservative German dioceses like Augsburg, and figures like Cardinal Gerhard Müller, warn that such moves risk undermining the Church's teaching on marriage as a lifelong union of man and woman, open to life.

 Pope Leo XIV's Full Remarks: Priorities and Unity

In his plane press conference, Pope Leo offered a nuanced response. He began by broadening the lens:

"First of all, I think it's very important that the unity or division of the church should not revolve around sexual matters. We tend to think that when the Church is talking about morality, that the only issue of morality is sexual. And in reality I believe there are much greater and more important issues such as justice, equality, freedom of men and women, freedom of religion that would all take priority before that particular issue."

This echoes his emphasis on social issues during the African trip, focusing on peace, migration, and evangelization in the face of challenges like sorcery and poverty. He stressed that all people are welcome: "All are invited to follow Jesus and all are invited to look for conversion in their lives."

On the specific German action, he reiterated Vatican guidance against formalization: "To go beyond that today, I think that the topic can cause more disunity than unity, and that we should look for ways to build our unity on Jesus Christ and what Jesus Christ teaches."

These words signal continuity with Fiducia Supplicans—pastoral blessings for individuals are possible—but a firm line against anything resembling a liturgical approval of unions. Leo positions himself as a unifier, wary of polarization, drawing from his pre-papal experience as a bishop and Augustinian.

 Theological and Pastoral Implications

Catholic teaching on marriage remains unchanged: it is the exclusive, indissoluble union of one man and one woman, reflecting Christ's love for the Church (cf. Gaudium et Spes 48; Catechism of the Catholic Church 1601-1666). Sexual relations outside this are considered sinful, yet the Church calls all to chastity according to their state and offers mercy to sinners.

Blessings, as sacramentals, invoke God's favor. Fiducia Supplicans and Leo's comments clarify that blessings cannot endorse sin but can accompany people in their journey. A priest might bless individuals in a same-sex relationship, praying for fidelity, health, or conversion, but not the union itself as "marriage" or equivalent. Formal rites risk scandal and confusion, especially where cultural battles over marriage redefinition rage.

Pope Leo's prioritization of justice and freedom aligns with the Church's social doctrine (Rerum Novarum onward). Issues like poverty, religious liberty, and human dignity demand attention. Reducing the Church's moral witness to sexuality alone caricatures it, ignoring the Gospel's holistic call. Yet, sexual ethics matter because they touch on the human person, family, and society—core to evangelization.

For German bishops, this is a call to obedience and communion. The principle of collegiality does not mean independence; bishops act in union with the Successor of Peter (Lumen Gentium 22-23). Persistent defiance echoes historical tensions, like the Kulturkampf or modern synodal experiments that some fear lead toward schism.

 Reactions and Broader Church Context

Reactions vary. Progressive voices, including Fr. James Martin, SJ, interpret Leo's words as not abrogating Fiducia Supplicans but urging focus elsewhere. Conservative commentators see a welcome correction against "German exceptionalism." African bishops, who largely resisted Fiducia Supplicans, likely appreciate the emphasis on unity without Western cultural imposition.

Leo XIV's background as an American with missionary experience (Peru) and Augustinian roots suggests a balanced approach: orthodox yet pastoral. In a 2023 interview as cardinal, he stressed welcoming all without exclusion based on lifestyle, while upholding teaching. His pre-conclave views noted concerns over media sympathy for practices "at odds with the gospel."

This moment tests his pontificate. With the German Church facing massive departures (hundreds of thousands annually), reforms must bear fruit in evangelization, not accommodation. The global South's growth contrasts Europe's decline, underscoring the need for fidelity to attract rather than dilute.

 Historical Parallels and Future Outlook

Blessings for same-sex couples echo ancient debates, but the Church has consistently upheld marriage's definition. From the early Fathers to Aquinas, to modern popes like St. John Paul II (Theology of the Body), the teaching is consistent. Innovations risk repeating errors of past movements that separated from Rome.

Pope Leo calls the Church to build unity on Christ, not culture wars. This means robust catechesis on anthropology, sexuality, and mercy; accompaniment for those with same-sex attraction (many experience the Church as home through chastity and friendship); and addressing root causes of division like clericalism and secularism.

For the laity, this invites prayer for bishops' fidelity, personal conversion, and witness. Families, as domestic churches, model Christ's love. Parishes can offer support groups, spiritual direction, and outreach without compromising truth.

 Conclusion: Unity in Truth and Charity

Pope Leo XIV's comments on the German bishops and same-sex blessings reaffirm that the Church welcomes all but cannot bless what contradicts its faith. Formalized rites for same-sex unions go beyond Fiducia Supplicans and risk disunity. Instead, focus on Jesus Christ, broader moral imperatives, and pastoral care that leads to conversion.

This is not rejection but invitation: all are blessed as children of God, called to holiness. In a divided world and Church, Leo urges centering on the Gospel. As the African trip showed, the Church thrives where it proclaims Christ unapologetically.

May this pontificate foster true synodality—walking together in fidelity to apostolic tradition—leading souls to salvation. The German bishops, and all, are called to heed the Vicar of Christ, building unity not around sexuality, but around the Cross and Resurrection.

 Sources

- National Catholic Reporter: "Asked about same-sex blessings, Leo says other issues will take priority" (April 2026).

- Reuters: "Pope Leo signals no plan to go beyond blessings for same-sex couples" (April 23, 2026).

- Vatican: Fiducia Supplicans (December 18, 2023).

- Various reports from CNA, OSV News, Catholic Herald, and Pillar Catholic on German Synodal Way and responses.

Additional context drawn from official Vatican statements and reliable Catholic news outlets.

Pope Leo XIV Continues Blessings of Same-Sex Partners

Pope Leo XIV Continues Blessings for Same-Sex Partners: A Step Toward Inclusion or a Divisive Stance?

In a move that has sparked both hope and controversy, Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, has signaled his intention to uphold the Catholic Church’s policy of allowing priests to bless individuals in same-sex relationships, a practice initiated by his predecessor, Pope Francis. This decision, rooted in the 2023 Vatican document Fiducia Supplicans, marks a significant moment in the Church’s ongoing navigation of its relationship with the LGBTQ+ community. While the policy does not endorse same-sex marriage, it extends pastoral care to individuals in “irregular” relationships, prompting varied reactions from Catholics worldwide. This blog post explores the context, implications, and reactions to Pope Leo XIV’s decision, grounded in recent developments and Vatican statements. The Context: Fiducia Supplicans and Pope Francis’ Legacy In December 2023, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, under Pope Francis, released Fiducia Supplicans: On the Pastoral Meaning of Blessings. This document, co-signed by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández and Monsignor Armando Matteo, permitted priests to offer non-liturgical blessings to individuals in same-sex relationships or other “irregular” situations, such as divorced and remarried couples. The document emphasized that these blessings are not endorsements of the relationships themselves but rather acts of pastoral care for individuals seeking God’s grace. It states that such blessings are for those who “recognize themselves to be destitute and in need of [God’s] help [and] do not claim a legitimation of their own status” (Fiducia Supplicans, quoted in Them, July 9, 2025).[](https://www.them.us/story/pope-leo-francis-same-sex-blessings-policy) This policy was a groundbreaking shift, as it marked the first time the Vatican formally allowed blessings for same-sex couples, albeit with strict qualifications. Pope Francis clarified that the Church does not bless same-sex unions as marriages, maintaining the traditional doctrine that marriage is a sacrament between a man and a woman. Despite this distinction, the decision faced significant backlash from conservative factions within the Church, particularly from African bishops and traditionalist groups, who viewed it as a step toward legitimizing same-sex relationships.[](https://www.metroweekly.com/2025/07/pope-leo-same-sex-blessings/) Pope Leo XIV’s Continuation of the Policy Following Pope Francis’ death in April 2025 and the election of Cardinal Robert Prevost as Pope Leo XIV, speculation arose about whether the new pontiff would reverse Fiducia Supplicans. As a Chicago-born cardinal with a reputation for a more conservative theological stance, some expected Leo XIV to align with traditionalist critics. However, in a brief interview on July 3, 2025, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, confirmed that the policy would remain under Leo XIV’s papacy. When asked by Il Messaggero if the blessings would be revoked, Fernández, who had recently met with the pope, responded, “I really don’t think so — the declaration will remain” (*Metro Weekly*, July 12, 2025).[](https://www.metroweekly.com/2025/07/pope-leo-same-sex-blessings/)[](https://www.outinperth.com/indications-blessings-of-same-sex-unions-will-remain-under-pope-leo-xiv/) This decision was further corroborated by multiple sources. The National Catholic Reporter noted that Fernández’s remarks were the “clearest indication to date” of Pope Leo XIV’s intent to maintain the policy, though they fell short of an official Vatican statement (*NCR*, July 7, 2025). Similarly, LGBTQ Nation reported that Fernández dismissed suggestions that Leo XIV would halt the blessings, emphasizing that the blessings apply to “the persons, naturally taking into account the context, sensitivities, the places where one lives, and the most appropriate ways to do it” (*LGBTQ Nation*, July 9, 2025).[](https://www.ncronline.org/vatican/vatican-news/gay-blessings-will-remain-under-pope-leo-vatican-doctrine-chief-says)[](https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/07/pope-leo-will-bless-same-unions-despite-having-once-decried-the-homosexual-lifestyle/) Pope Leo XIV’s Complex Stance Pope Leo XIV’s decision to continue the blessings is notable given his past statements. In 2012, as Bishop Robert Prevost, he criticized the “homosexual lifestyle” and “alternative families” formed by same-sex couples, according to resurfaced remarks cited by *The New York Times* (*derechadiario.com.ar*, July 7, 2025). These comments have fueled concerns among LGBTQ+ advocates that his support for blessings may be a pragmatic continuation of Francis’ policy rather than a genuine shift toward inclusivity. However, in 2023, when asked if his views had evolved, Prevost acknowledged Pope Francis’ call for a more inclusive Church, stating that Francis “made it very clear that he doesn’t want people to be excluded simply on the basis of choices that they make” (*LGBTQ Nation*, July 9, 2025).[](https://derechadiario.com.ar/us/argentina/pope-leo-xiv-marriage-is-only-possible-between-a-man-and-a-woman)[](https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/07/pope-leo-will-bless-same-unions-despite-having-once-decried-the-homosexual-lifestyle/) This duality reflects Leo XIV’s delicate balancing act. He has reaffirmed the Church’s traditional teaching that marriage is “only possible between a man and a woman,” as stated in a July 2025 declaration that sparked widespread debate (*County Local News*, July 7, 2025). Yet, his decision to uphold Fiducia Supplicans suggests a willingness to engage with modern pastoral realities, even if it does not extend to endorsing same-sex marriage.[](https://countylocalnews.com/2025/07/07/breaking-pope-leo-xiv-declares-marriage-can-only-be-between-a-man-and-a-woman-sparking-outrage-and-debate-papal-declaration-on-marriage-traditional-marriage-definition-religious-sta/) Reactions: Support, Criticism, and Polarization The decision to continue blessings for same-sex partners has elicited a spectrum of reactions. Progressive Catholics and LGBTQ+ advocates have welcomed the move as a sign of continuity with Pope Francis’ more inclusive approach. Posts on X from organizations like EdgewaterPCUSA and lgbtchi celebrated the decision, noting its significance for both Catholics and Protestants, given the pope’s global influence as a Christian leader (*X posts*, July 9, 2025). Human rights activist Peter Tatchell acknowledged the continuation of blessings but highlighted Leo XIV’s opposition to same-sex marriage, underscoring the policy’s limitations (*X post*, July 9, 2025). Conversely, conservative Catholics have expressed disappointment. Some traditionalist voices on X, such as BigModernism, lamented that Leo XIV’s decision represents a continuation of what they call the “lavender revolution,” accusing the Vatican of misleading claims about reform (*X post*, July 6, 2025). Critics argue that the blessings, even if limited to individuals, blur the lines of Church teaching on marriage and could lead to further liberalization. African bishops, who were vocal critics of Fiducia Supplicans, have continued to express unease, prompting the Vatican to clarify that the blessings are not endorsements of same-sex unions (*Metro Weekly*, July 12, 2025).[](https://www.metroweekly.com/2025/07/pope-leo-same-sex-blessings/) Implications for the Church and Beyond Pope Leo XIV’s decision to maintain the blessings policy reflects a broader tension within the Catholic Church: how to remain faithful to traditional doctrine while responding to a world where attitudes toward same-sex relationships are increasingly accepting. The policy allows the Church to extend pastoral care without altering its sacramental theology, but it also risks alienating both progressive and conservative factions. For LGBTQ+ Catholics, the continuation of blessings offers a measure of inclusion, yet the Church’s firm stance against same-sex marriage may leave many feeling that true equality remains out of reach (*Outreach*, July 8, 2025).[](https://outreach.faith/2025/07/why-did-the-vaticans-doctrine-chief-recently-weigh-in-on-the-2023-same-sex-blessings-decree/) Globally, the decision has implications for the Church’s influence in regions with varying cultural attitudes toward homosexuality. In Western countries, where same-sex marriage is widely recognized, the blessings may be seen as a modest step forward. In contrast, in regions like Africa, where conservative values dominate, the policy could deepen divisions among bishops and laity. The Vatican’s careful framing—emphasizing that blessings are for individuals, not unions—aims to mitigate this tension, but it may not fully satisfy either side. Looking Ahead As Pope Leo XIV navigates his papacy, his approach to LGBTQ+ issues will likely remain a focal point. His appointment of figures like Cardinal Arthur Roche, who supported *Fiducia Supplicans*, to key Vatican roles suggests a commitment to continuity in some areas (*vaticancatholic.com*, June 26, 2025). However, his conservative leanings and past statements indicate that significant reforms, such as recognizing same-sex marriages, are unlikely.[](https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-leo-appoints-cardinal-roche-same-sex-blessing-supporters-to-dicastery-for-consecrated-life) The continuation of blessings for same-sex partners is a testament to the Church’s attempt to balance tradition and modernity. For some, it represents a hopeful gesture of inclusion; for others, it’s a compromise that falls short of justice or fidelity to doctrine. As debates unfold, Pope Leo XIV’s leadership will be tested by the challenge of uniting a diverse global Church while addressing the pastoral needs of all its members. Sources: - *Metro Weekly*, July 12, 2025[](https://www.metroweekly.com/2025/07/pope-leo-same-sex-blessings/)

- *Them*, July 9, 2025[](https://www.them.us/story/pope-leo-francis-same-sex-blessings-policy)

- *LGBTQ Nation*, July 9, 2025[](https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/07/pope-leo-will-bless-same-unions-despite-having-once-decried-the-homosexual-lifestyle/)

- *National Catholic Reporter*, July 7, 2025[](https://www.ncronline.org/vatican/vatican-news/gay-blessings-will-remain-under-pope-leo-vatican-doctrine-chief-says)

- *Out in Perth*, July 8, 2025[](https://www.outinperth.com/indications-blessings-of-same-sex-unions-will-remain-under-pope-leo-xiv/)

- *County Local News*, July 7, 2025[](https://countylocalnews.com/2025/07/07/breaking-pope-leo-xiv-declares-marriage-can-only-be-between-a-man-and-a-woman-sparking-outrage-and-debate-papal-declaration-on-marriage-traditional-marriage-definition-religious-sta/)

- *derechadiario.com.ar*, July 7, 2025[](https://derechadiario.com.ar/us/argentina/pope-leo-xiv-marriage-is-only-possible-between-a-man-and-a-woman)

- *Outreach*, July 8, 2025[](https://outreach.faith/2025/07/why-did-the-vaticans-doctrine-chief-recently-weigh-in-on-the-2023-same-sex-blessings-decree/)

- *vaticancatholic.com*, June 26, 2025[](https://vaticancatholic.com/pope-leo-appoints-cardinal-roche-same-sex-blessing-supporters-to-dicastery-for-consecrated-life) - Various posts on X, July 5-9, 2025

Just in Time For 'Pride:" Gay Porn Actor 'Austin Wolf" Arrested For Child Porn

Just in time for the end of "Gay Pride Month" with the Pride March taking place June 30th, 2024, we have some gay news to report.  A popular gay porn degenerate named "Austin Wolf" was arrested on Friday by the FBI after a probe was conducted on the encrypted app Telegram.  "Wolf" whose l name is Justin Heath Smith 43 years of age exchanged videos with FBI agents pretending to be fans of child pornography. 

The videos are described as horrific and even showed a 10-year-old male child bound and being raped. The degenerate gay porn actor sent the disgusting content from a Manhattan apartment he rented.  This location was raided in April and over 200 videos depicting child porn on an SD card were discovered inside his personal computer room.

Smith was ordered to be held without bail at a Manhattan federal court.  New York prosecutor Getzel Berger said he is a "danger to children online, danger to children offline, danger to children everywhere."  Smith is being defended by lawyer Michael Baldassare who requested from US Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky that Smith be placed under 24-hour house arrest while wearing a GPS monitor.  

His attorney also pleaded with the judge not to send his client to Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center which is known as a dangerous location and where an inmate was stabbed to death recently.  However, Tarnofsky called the allegations "very troubling" and that letting Smith go under house arrest "could not reasonably assure the safety of the community."  Smith was charged with counts of distributing and reception of child pornography as well as possession of it.  He faces 5 to 20 years in a federal prison.  Federal marshals escorted Smith out of the courtroom as his partner of 10 years mouthed to him, "I'm sorry."  He will appear in court again in July.

This story is of no surprise to anyone.  Since the 1940s it was always the suspicion of law enforcement, psychologists, parents, and others at the time that homosexuals were predators of children.  There were even videos of this propaganda aired on television and presented at schools and churches.  Take this one for example:

Psychology before the 1970s was much different. It was not politically correct.  Psychologists like John B. Watson, Joseph Nicolosi, Richard Socarides, and others seriously sought to understand homosexuality and condemned it as a mental illness. They even offered treatments or conversion therapies.  This is a topic for another post, however, we wanted to bring this up in relation to the news of today and why there has always been a link between pedophilia, ephebophilia, and homosexuality. 

Since the existence of homosexuality, records available to us from ancient Greeks, Romans, and older civilizations show a pattern of a fondness for younger men and boys on the part of homosexuals of the time which extends to today.  We see in these ancient civilizations how wealthy and powerful men often had a concubine on the side who was a younger male. In most instances, they were young boys who had yet to hit puberty.  This was accepted at the time just like with the relationship between the alleged prophet Mohammed and the nine-year-old Aisha who was the wife he had.  

Today it is a somewhat different world. These kinds of "relationships" are frowned upon and are illegal in most nations with some offering ages of consent as a gray area.  In the gay or lgbtqia community things have not really changed. We still see a fondness for younger men on the part of older men. These young men are called "Twinks" while the older men are called "Bears," "DILFs," or "dad/daddies."  In many gay porn productions, the fantasy of "dad and son" is often played out. There are even some with gay men and younger men playing the role of priest and altar boy.  Teacher and son, coach and player, or even uncle and nephew are not far behind. It is a world of perversion devoid of morals and reason. 

In gay apps used to "hook up" or find "partners," there are often many young gay men who are minors who pretend to be older in order to "experiment" or find their "older men" types. Law enforcement often ignores these apps where a lot of sexual abuse of minors is initiated.   The images demonstrated here show 'Austin Wolf' engaging in sexual perversions and courtship with younger men, one looks extremely young, possibly a teenager. This is the content these gay porn companies make and the content has a lot of subscribers.

With the onset of Only Fans, many young teen boys are using the site to make money from old perverted men seeking to enjoy their young bodies.  Again, no one does anything about this.  It is left to the side. This is why 'Austin Wolf' felt confident enough to send and receive child pornography on an app like Telegram. There is a whole world out there that is hidden but not hidden, per se.    This perverted gay porn star is just one of the many more out there.  

However, with the atmosphere of political correctness the powers that be are afraid to touch the homosexual community out of fear of being labeled homophobic. This is the world we live in today.  Hopefully the people "Wolf" was sending child porn to are apprehended as well and the FBI begins to monitor gay institutions, apps, and porn channels.  Rest assured that Telegram is not the only place this evil thing is exchanged.   

Unfortunately, our own Catholic Church and her seminaries have been infected with this "filth" as the late Pope Benedict XVI described it and we describe it as pure evil.  

Kudos to the FBI for monitoring Telegram. Let us hope and pray they expand and monitor everything else.  This evil is real and is in plain sight.  Those who find a sexual fantasy of "dad and son," "uncle," "teacher and student" or even use terms like "twink, daddy and bear" need to be monitored.  It is most likely these perverted and disturbed individuals have skeletons in the closets they came out from.  

Parents and guardians, teachers, and others, please keep an eye on kids and their activities. Please protect them! There are a lot of evil perverted and disgusting animals out there posing as humans.  It is no wonder why Smith used the porn name "Wolf." He is a wolf preying on the young.  Unfortunately, he is not the only one. This is scary to think about!   

 

Source: 

Popular gay porn star Austin Wolf busted for trading sickening child porn: feds (nypost.com) 

Adult Film Actor Austin Wolf Charged With Distribution of Child Porn | Complex

Porn star Austin Wolf arrested following FBI investigation | Fox News

Adult film star Austin Wolf is arrested over horrific child pornography video charges | Daily Mail Online

Adult film star Austin Wolf is arrested on charges of distributing child sexual abuse material online (nbcnews.com)

austin wolf - Google Search

Austin Wolf arrested on child pornography charges in NYC – NBC New York

Gay Porn Star Austin Wolf Arrested on Child Pornography Charges (tmz.com)

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/adult-film-actor-justin-heath-smith-aka-austin-wolf-charged-distribution-child

Pope Uses 'Gay' Slur Again

Pope Francis allegedly used the word frociaggine (Italian word for "Faggotry) again account to the Italian news service ANSA. They claim that in a closed meeting with priests at the Pontifical Salesian University in Rome that the Pope said, “In Vaticano c’è aria di frociaggine” – meaning “In the Vatican, there is an air of faggotry.”  He also said to have stated that gay men can be "good boys" but that they should not be let into seminaries.  

This claim of his use of the word comes shy of a monthly apology for using the same phrase at a May 20th meeting with Italian bishops (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2024/05/pope-francis-too-much-faggotry-in.html). The Pope's usage of the word is worrisome to those who call themselves "progressive" and who have seen his papacy as such. He did say "Who am I to judge" in reference to gay people and has been more open towards the homosexual community than any previous pope. There is no confirmation as of yet if this latest incident is accurate or truthful or is just an attempt by the Italian media to garner attention for their outlets.  

Moreover, some believe the pope is intentionally doing this in order to be more forceful about the no-gays-in-seminary policy and does not want the media to control him. In any event, the use of the word does contradict his open and pastoral work with homosexuals and the comments he made to an expelled seminary student who wrote to him regarding his expulsion after informing seminary officials that he was gay (see: Sacerdotus: Pope to Gay Man Rejected By Seminary: Continue On!).  

This time there is no news of an apology so we can assume that the word was not used again and this is just the Italian media publishing tabloids for hits, so to speak.  

Sources:

What’s going on with the Pope? | Dazed (dazeddigital.com)

Pope Francis reportedly uses offensive term for homosexuality a second time | Crux (cruxnow.com)

Why Did a Progressive Pope Use a Gay Slur? | The Nation

The Pope Has Reportedly Once Again Used the F-Slur in a Closed-Door Meeting | Them

Did Pope Francis use that word again? And other Vatican confusion. – Catholic World Report

Pope Francis accused of repeating homophobic slur in another closed-door meeting | The Independent

Pope Francis: 'Too Much Faggotry in Seminaries..."

Pope Francis is once again in the headlines for comments he allegedly made.  According to reports, the pope said that there is too much "frociaggine" or "faggotry" in seminaries. According to Time.com, "The remark, said to have been made during a closed-door meeting last Monday, was first reported by Italian news and gossip site Dagospia and then affirmed by Italian newspapers la Repubblica and Corriere della Sera, which each cited unnamed firsthand sources."  

Matteo Bruni, director of the Holy See Press Office, in a statement on Tuesday, “The Pope never intended to offend or express himself in homophobic terms, and he apologizes to those who felt offended by the use of a term, as reported by others.." 

According to reports, when the pope stated this, bishops in attendance laughed. The comment is being dismissed as a "gaffe" on the part of Pope Francis due to a lack of understanding of the word's context in Italy. Despite the pope being of Italian descent, he is an Argentinian and grew up in a predominantly Latino culture. 

American Magazine and other publications are also excusing the pope's use of the word as a mere gaffe and that it was not intended to offend anyone, in particular, the LGBTQIA community.  

The comment does come as strange after Pope Francis has been the only pope to have reached out to those in the Gay community and has been "gay-friendly."  Despite affirming Catholic teaching on Homosexuality, the pope has always made it a point to be merciful and amicable towards those in the Gay community.  

Source:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/27/pope-francis-reported-derogatory-phrase-homosexuals/

https://time.com/6982651/pope-francis-reported-homophobic-slur-gay-priests-seminaries/

https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2024/05/27/news/papa_francesco_incontro_vescovi_gay_frociaggine-423115446/

https://archive.is/pLiCa

https://www.dagospia.com/?refresh_ce

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2024-05/pope-francis-apology-italian-bishops-conference.html

'Pride' Night at Dodgers' Stadium an Epic Fail

It sure was a "proud" and "prideful" night at the La Dodgers' stadium, but not for the reason you may be thinking. It was supposed to be "Gay Pride" night at the stadium. Several gay entities were supposed to be awarded and honored. Among them were the "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence," a hate group that mocks Catholics and the Christian faith. At first, the Dodgers disinvited this group only to reinvite them again. 

This brought the ire of Catholics, Protestants, Conservatives, and even Jews and other groups who saw this as a slap to the face of religion. The Dodgers simply did not care about honoring this hate group that makes fun of nuns, women, and the Catholic faith. Many of us have gotten to know religious sisters in different ways and can attest to their hard work and faith. To honor a group of men who dress in drag that openly mock nun is just disgusting and disrespectful. Many Catholics pledged to gather peacefully and protest the Dodgers and the hate group. 

Among them would be Bishop Strickland of Texas who is an orthodox champion of the Catholic faith who is not afraid to face the wrath of the world for the sake of Christ. Sadly, he was the only Catholic bishop in participation. Nevertheless, tens of thousands came from across the United States to pray and peacefully protest. Bishop Strickland even brought a first-class relic of St. John Paul II. 

They gathered outside of the stadium praying and speaking out against the hate group being honored inside. Meanwhile, on the inside things were different. The hate group was surrounded by a large presence of police but with the stadium nearly empty. As the members of the hate group were announced, there was clear disapproval with jeers and booing. 

 It was a disastrous night for the LGBTQIA. Hopefully, the LA Dodgers and other teams in sports learned their lesson. America does not want this propaganda in our pastime. We have had enough and are pushing back. We cannot let a tyrannical minority impose on everyone else their delusions under the guise of "equal rights."

 

The Dodgers sold Christians out... for this? https://t.co/7s3ZVdnXzI

— Ben Domenech (@bdomenech) June 17, 2023

The world is over the woke agenda.

MASSIVE Christian groups have arrived outside Dodger stadium to PROTEST the ANTI CHRISTIAN GROUP that the Dodgers are honoring!!!

WE ARE WITH YOU!!! pic.twitter.com/qkSMdynEKQ

— Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) June 16, 2023

Signs read "Satan Has No Rights" and "Stop the Blasphemy" as hundreds gather at Dodger Stadium to protest the team honoring the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence with a Community Service Award at Pride Night. https://t.co/7BCoBzdKld pic.twitter.com/byCqlLT2X2

— KTLA (@KTLA) June 16, 2023

A massive group of Catholics and Christians have arrived outside of Dodger Stadium to pray in protest of the Dodgers honoring the "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence."
pic.twitter.com/HYprx1N16l

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) June 16, 2023

Christians pray outside Dodgers Stadium to protest the team’s decision to honour the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. pic.twitter.com/sqeJKrvOmx

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) June 16, 2023

Prayerful Procession at Dodger Stadium pic.twitter.com/NF2WXSBxDA

— Grace Chong 🇺🇸 (@gc22gc) June 16, 2023

Dodger Stadium forced to shut gate A. Hundreds of people are protesting the game tonight for honoring an LGBTQ+ nun group. @knxnews pic.twitter.com/26Rr3oM6pd

— Nataly Tavidian (@NatalyTavidian) June 17, 2023

Jack Posobiec leads prayer in Latin outside of Dodger Stadium during protest against the Dodgers honoring anti-Catholic drag queen group @JackPosobiec pic.twitter.com/YQ49Xtb1zm

— Jayne Zirkle (@JayneZirkle) June 16, 2023

Catholic protesters march towards Dodgers Stadium where the Dodgers are honoring anti-Catholic drag queen group during tonight’s pregame ceremony pic.twitter.com/V8J8ucFPTC

— Jayne Zirkle (@JayneZirkle) June 17, 2023

🚨 Catholics and other Christians protest outside of Dodger Stadium in opposition to the team honoring the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence”.

🎥: @sav_says_
pic.twitter.com/BgCzvOSrFH

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) June 16, 2023

At the March for Catholics, thousands of participants rally at one of the entrances to the @Dodgers' stadium. pic.twitter.com/d5g3ihGrOc

— LifeSiteNews (@LifeSite) June 17, 2023

LOS ANGELES- Thousands of Catholics are now marching toward the front of Dodger Stadium chanting “Save Our Children!”

Catholic organizers shared they wanted to make a stand for Christ where everyone could see them: pic.twitter.com/WC7YL1O3n0

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) June 17, 2023

LOS ANGELES- A huge group of Catholics and Christians have already arrived outside of Dodger Stadium to pray in protest of the Dodgers honoring the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.

A drag group that has repeatedly mocked Christ and the Catholic faith: pic.twitter.com/oHPIeHoCI3

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) June 16, 2023

“If you are anti-Catholic, you’re anti-religion, you’re anti-God, I got a problem with that”

A Jewish rabbi speaks in solidarity with the Catholics outside of Dodger Stadium. The crowd has exponentially grown in size and more people are still continuing to arrive: pic.twitter.com/6WiYRIWZvp

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) June 16, 2023

DODGER STADIUM-The “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” are recognized for Pride night to a mostly empty audience.

Two Dodgers fan nearby begin loudly booing after they’re announced: pic.twitter.com/OO6NT5RIc8

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) June 17, 2023

BREAKING: Thousands of Catholics have shut down the main entrance to Dodger Stadium on Vin Scully avenue in protest of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence being honored tonight.

They are now lining the sidewalks and have taken over the entire block: pic.twitter.com/F5CSDvuap8

— Savanah Hernandez (@sav_says_) June 17, 2023

What do you think? Post below on Disqus. Remember to follow the rules so your comment can be posted. 

Source:

Thousands protest Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence outside Dodger Stadium hours before start of Pride Night | Fox News

Thousands protest Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence outside Dodger Stadium hours before start of Pride Night (msn.com)

WATCH: Dodgers Honor Anti-Catholic Drag Queens in Front of a Near Empty Stadium (breitbart.com)

Dodger Stadium EMPTY for Gay Pride Ceremony - Todd Starnes

Thousands protest outside stadium as Dodgers honor troupe of drag-queen 'nuns' - Washington Times

 

'For We Are Many' - Legion & LGBTQI Pronoun Fixation

Within the last decades, a lot has changed. Gay Pride has been spreading like a virus around the world, especially in the media. We see the "rainbow" colors all over the place. On websites, social media, and even at the White House, State government buildings, schools, and some churches. If anyone dares criticize or comment against this, they are canceled, ostracized, banned from social media platforms, and in some cases, even arrested.  We even have some Catholics in the clergy and laity defend this movement to the point of watering down the Church's teachings rooted in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition.  It is just a bizarre time to live in.  The question is, what is behind all of this?  

People using the pronouns "they, them, their" seems analogous with "We are Legion (Mark 5:9)." It makes no sense to use these words to identify one individual.  Are we seeing demonic activity manifesting in social engineering?  A religious sister on Twitter was recently attacked by a Franciscan priest who teaches at St. Bonaventure University over comments making this connection with the pronoun use and Legion of the Gospels. This, again is so absurd. It feels like one is in the Twilight Zone program where reality seems to alter itself as one is living it.  

I am sure anyone who may be gay or an "LGBTQI ally" and is reading this will automatically label this post as "homophobic." This take is also absurd and a huge problem. Criticism is not hate. If something is immune from criticism, then it is a dictatorship that often pretends to have invincibility and later falls down hard. This post is not meant to be hateful, but to provide critical thinking to the phenomenon going on in regards to "pronouns."  As a Christian, I cannot help but see the correlation between Mark 5:9 and the insistence on using absurd pronouns in today's age. I am not stating that members of the gay community are demons or of the devil. What I am stating is that there may be a demonic influence behind it. Ephesians 6:12 reads, "For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."  In other words, we Christians are not at war with our fellow brothers and sisters who may not share our faith or may not share it completely. We are at war with the spiritual forces of evil and the powers of this dark world, as Ephesians describes them.  

Those who know a bit about exorcisms know that there are different ways in which the devil or demons attack humans. Most are familiar with demonic possession when a demon or group of demons take over a human body and mind causing it to behave strangely and manifest superhuman traits. Then there are the less familiar terms of demonic obsession and oppression.  Demonic obsession is when the devil or demons literally are obsessed with an individual. They harass the person and even inflict misfortunes on them. Finally, there is demonic oppression which has some commonality with obsession but focuses more on the spiritual well-being of the person. In demonic oppression, the individual becomes to get weighed down by demonic attacks which are sometimes subtle. When the individual falls into temptation and sin, the demon(s) jump on this moment and begin to make the individual's life difficult. The individual is tempted and harassed so greatly that he or she beings to suffer spiritually, psychologically, emotionally, and even physically.  This will eventually lead to doubting, indifference towards religious convictions, acedia, and other ills. It is like a deep spiritual depression where one becomes hopeless, feels alone, and starts doubting everyone including themselves just like in the case of psychological depression which may lead to suicide.  

Agnosticism and Atheism are forms of demonic oppression. Remember, if you reject God then you open yourself to His opponent de facto. One does not need to invite satan and his demons in via word, thought, or action. Just by rejecting God and/or sinning without care, one is inviting the enemy in. Similarly, if one is living in the sin of homosexuality without concern for it as if it were nothing serious, one is inviting in demonic forces that one truly cannot comprehend because they are in the spiritual realm. This is why we see a large amount of the LGBTQI population suffering from mental illnesses and even committing suicide. Some may blame religion or religious proselytism for this, but there is no correlation. People many times complain that the government is oppressing them, but we do not see a lot of suicides because of this. Similarly, there are other things that people feel weigh heavily on them, but we do not see high numbers of mental illness or suicide among these groups. Homosexuality is distinct in this regard.  

This is why we must look into the obsession with absurd pronoun use. The demand to use strange pronouns causes confusion which is a sign of the devil who is a liar and caused confusion on day one with Adam and Eve. The demand to use strange pronouns means to convey plurality in order to represent one individual is a sign of "Legion" who was "many" in the one. It erases the sense one personhood and turns the individual into a plurality of expressions or manifestations.  To describe oneself as "they" or "them" or even "Us" or "zir" is to attempt to depart from the physical realm where our ontology only manifests in a singular and constant form. Only the spiritual realm is free of physicality and physics. Those who are not wise and who are blind to the spiritual world see this abuse of pronouns as nothing serious. It is just someone "living their truth" or "their expression." However, those of us who have the grace to see beyond the physical can see there is indeed something spiritual behind this and it is not good (2 Timothy 2:26, Ephesians 2:2).  

Again, this post is not meant to attack the LGBTQI people but to critically think about what is influencing it. We are all being attacked and influenced by the devil. The LGBTQI community cannot be singled out. However, they are the ones currently pushing their propaganda aggressively on all of us, so it begs the question of why and why this phenomenon is so powerful. Not even Nazism was able to convince so many of its ideology. The Catholic Church herself was once the superpower of the Western world and even she did not have such influence and control over the masses. So how can a minority of people with a simple "rainbow" flag have so much influence and power over the masses?  

Is it money? Is it a pity for those who have been targets of hate and abuse over the centuries?  Is it an attempt to be allied with this minority group?  In light of the many other groups who have more money and have had established power but were not able to reach the amount of control as the LGBTQI have, we can truly suspect that the power behind this agenda is demonic. Remember, Scripture and Jesus Himself have referred to satan as being the "ruler of this word" or "god of this age." (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11, 2 Corinthians 4:4, Colossians 1:13).  That being stated, things in this world are influenced directly by the devil and demons.  We can assume that the influence, power, and extreme protection that homosexuality has gotten from the world is directly from satan himself because he is the ruler of this world and has great influence over it.  Many people do not even notice that the Pride flag has six colors, a number often attributed to the antichrist. We who studied physics know that the rainbow has seven colors, a number associated with God. 

This is why we must minister to homosexual persons with love, the hard truth and grace. There is no place for homophobia or hate in Christianity and evangelization. Some Protestant denominations force conversion therapy on their homosexual parishioners, however, we as Catholics must let God's grace do the conversion. We all need conversion, not just homosexuals. All of us sin, not just homosexuals. We are all targets of satan. This evil and proud creature hates us and is envious of us (Wisdom 2:24).  We must remember that this creature is the target, not homosexuals or one another. He is our enemy, not homosexuals or any other person who may not share our faith.   

What are your thoughts on this?  Post them below on Disqus. Remember to follow the rules of engagement for your comment to be permitted on this post.  

Former Nuncio Blames Pope Francis for McCarrick

As if the recent report in Philadelphia is not enough, now we have a bombshell at the top of the Catholic Church.  Former Apostolic Nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano is making claims in a 11-page written testament that Pope Francis withdrew sanctions against former Cardinal, Archbishop Theodore McCarrick.  McCarrick has been recently exposed as a homosexual predator who prayed on young teens and seminarians during his time in New York, New Jersey and Washington D.C. see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2018/06/cardinal-mccarrick-accused-of-sexual.html.

Archbishop Vigano says that Pope Benedict XVI had imposed sanctions on then Cardinal McCarrick which were later removed by Pope Francis in 2013 upon taking the see of Peter. Vigano claims that Pope Francis protected and covered for McCarrick and made him his "trusted counselor."  He continues claiming that McCarrick told Pope Francis to appoint several bishops in the United States, particularly Cardinals Blase Cupich and Joseph Tobin.

Vigano says that corruption has reached the top of the heirarchy and urges un the dictates of the conscience for Pope Francis and all those who covered up for McCarrick to immediately resign from office.

This news is troubling to say the least. If true, Pope Francis et al., must indeed, resign now!  However, in the spirit of true journalism, there is always two sides. Let us not forget that Archbishop Vigano was replaced by Pope Francis in 2016 see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2016/04/apostolic-nuncio-replaced-media-slant.html. The media claimed that he was replaced for inviting Kim Davis to meet the Pope during his 2015 visit to the United States of America. Could Vigano be retaliating against the pope like a disgruntle former employee? Or was Vigano really removed because of Kim Davis who is known for refusing gay couples marriage licenses?  If so, then this would mead that Pope Francis did listen to McCarrick who is an alleged homosexual and is against anyone who speaks out against the LGBTQ agenda.  

You can read the testimony here: https://www.scribd.com/document/387040553/TESTIMONY-of-His-Excellency-Carlo-Maria-Vigano-Titular-Archbishop-of-Ulpiana-Apostolic-Nuncio#from_embed




Source:

https://www.scribd.com/document/387040553/TESTIMONY-of-His-Excellency-Carlo-Maria-Vigano-Titular-Archbishop-of-Ulpiana-Apostolic-Nuncio#from_embed

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/ex-nuncio-accuses-pope-francis-of-failing-to-act-on-mccarricks-abuse

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/former-us-nuncio-pope-francis-knew-of-mccarricks-misdeeds-repealed-sanction

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/ex-nuncio-accuses-pope-francis-of-failing-to-act-on-mccarricks-abuse-reports-81797

When We Rise...Yet Fall In Ratings

As many of you know, ABC aired a miniseries special on the LGBT agenda and how it rose to power.  The series was entitled "When We Rise."  It is partially based on gay activist and AIDS quilt creator Cleve Jones' book by the same name.  The intention of the series was clearly propaganda, however, it also served as a history lesson from the view point of the activists featured in the series. ABC anticipated the series to be a success in light of the up-rise in support for homosexuals. The anticipation fell short.  According to reports, "When We Rise" was a failure.  The ratings were abysmal.

Not many people tuned in to watch this pro-LGBT series.  Some are blaming the LGBT community itself for the failure.  I have mixed feelings over the series's failure. On one hand, I am happy many did not get this propaganda pounded into their brains; however, on the other hand, it is unfortunate that not many got to learn the history. Whether or not we agree with the LGBT agenda, we must acknowledge that the events surrounding "When We Rise" are history. They are part of our American History.

Real life Roma Guy, Ken Jones and Cleve Jones

The series also highlights what those in the LGBT community had to deal with. Surprisingly enough, the series honestly portrayed the AIDS epidemic as originating from the LGBT community.  The consequence of promiscuity and selfishness is presented well. Cleve Jones infects his partner Riccardo with HIV.  He never warned him before having sexual contact. Riccardo later commits suicide. Similarly, Ken Jones and his partner are revealed to have HIV after living a life of promiscuity at the bath houses and clubs. The hypocrisy of the radical feminist movement is presented well in the portrayal of Roman Guy.  Moreover, we see the discrimination Ken Jones faced for being black and gay, as well as, the problems of getting with a partner and depending on him/her not knowing what will happen when he/she passes away.  Jones is evicted from the home he shared with his partner after his partner died of HIV. He then turned to a life of addiction and depression because of the gay lifestyle.

I give the series a B+.  Austin Mckenzie and his portrayal of young Cleve was amazing. He even looked like him!  The other actors as well did a phenomenal job playing their characters.  They took us back to the moments presented, literally.  As an academic and Catholic, I cannot ignore the historical value of the series nor the suffering the LGBT endured and still endure. This series highlighted this well (though there were many inaccuracies, historically speaking; and artistic license was used) and should remind us that we have to hate the sin, but love the sinner. This miniseries makes me condemn the homosexual lifestyle even more after seeing the negative impact it has had on so many people. Cleve Jones, Roma Guy, Ken Jones and others are heroes in their own respect. They fought for the respect of others. Whether or not we agree with what they fought for, we must respect their courage and determination.

"When We Rise" may have been a failure, but the events it represented were clearly successful.




Source:

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/daily-ratings/friday-final-ratings-march-3-2017/

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2017/03/07/when_we_rise_s_ratings_failure_says_little_about_the_state_of_queer_tv.html

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/matt-philbin/2017/03/06/does-when-we-rises-failure-signal-end-cultures-long-gay-moment

http://www.justjared.com/2017/03/08/dustin-lance-black-responds-to-when-we-rises-ratings-it-will-live-online-for-a-long-time/

http://www.christianpost.com/news/abcs-lgbt-miniseries-when-we-rise-suffered-low-ratings-176777/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/03/05/ratings-tank-abcs-gay-rights-drama-rise/

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2017/03/07/when_we_rise_s_ratings_failure_says_little_about_the_state_of_queer_tv.html

http://www.advocate.com/media/2017/3/02/when-we-rise-falls-again-ratings-eyewitness-canceled

http://www.advocate.com/television/2017/2/28/when-we-rise-ratings-disappoint