Showing posts with label The Devil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Devil. Show all posts

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Is Pope Leo XIV the Antichrist?

The idea that the Pope is the Antichrist has a long history in certain strands of Protestant theology, originating primarily during the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. 

Reformers such as Martin Luther, John Calvin, and others identified the papacy with the Antichrist described in Scripture, viewing the Roman Catholic Church’s claims of authority, its hierarchical structure, and certain practices as a corruption of biblical Christianity. 

This claim is often supported by passages such as 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, which speaks of “the man of lawlessness” who “opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God,” as well as Daniel 7:25 and Revelation 13, which describe a figure or power that persecutes the saints, changes times and laws, and receives worship. However, despite these interpretations, the Pope cannot be the Antichrist.

The Bible describes the Antichrist (or "man of lawlessness," "beast," etc.) primarily in these key passages (using ESV for clarity unless noted):


 Core Biblical Descriptions

- 1 John 2:18, 22: "Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come... Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son."  

  The spirit of antichrist also denies that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh (1 John 4:3; 2 John 7).


- 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, 8-9: "Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God... And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth and bring to nothing by the appearance of his coming. The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders."


- Revelation 13:1-8 (the Beast): A beast rises from the sea with ten horns and seven heads, blasphemes God, exercises authority for 42 months, makes war on the saints, and receives worship from all whose names are not in the book of life. It receives power from the dragon (Satan).


- Daniel 7:8, 20-25 (little horn): Arises among ten horns/kings, speaks great/blasphemous words against the Most High, wears out the saints, attempts to change times and laws, and is given authority for "a time, times, and half a time" (often interpreted as 3.5 years).


- Other traits: Performs counterfeit miracles/signs/wonders to deceive (2 Thess. 2:9-10); comes "in his own name" and is received by those who reject the true Christ (John 5:43); exalts himself greatly and magnifies himself (Daniel 8:25, 11:36); associated with a period of global deception and persecution before Christ's return.


The Antichrist figure is a future end-times deceiver who opposes Christ, promotes lawlessness, demands worship as God (or in God's place), blasphemes, and leads many astray with satanic power—often linked to a rebuilt temple desecration (the "abomination of desolation") and ultimate destruction by Christ at His second coming.


 Pope Leo XIV Background

Pope Leo XIV (born Robert Francis Prevost on September 14, 1955, in Chicago, Illinois) is the current Bishop of Rome, elected on May 8, 2025, as the 267th pope. He is the first American-born pope and the first from the Order of Saint Augustine. He previously served as a missionary in Peru (where he holds dual citizenship), prior general of the Augustinians, and prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops under Pope Francis. He is approximately 70 years old, known for a moderate/administrative style, focus on social issues like the poor and migrants, and interest in ethical questions around technology (e.g., AI). His motto draws from St. Augustine: “In Illo uno unum” (“In the One Christ, we are one”).


 Comparison: Why Pope Leo XIV Does Not Match the Biblical Antichrist

Pope Leo XIV clearly does not fulfill the biblical criteria for the Antichrist. Here's a direct point-by-point contrast based on Scripture:


1. Denial of Christ vs. Affirmation of Christ  

   The Antichrist denies that Jesus is the Christ and denies the Father and the Son (1 John 2:22; 4:3). Pope Leo XIV, as head of the Catholic Church, publicly confesses Jesus Christ as Lord, God incarnate, and the Savior—core to Catholic doctrine and his own Augustinian spirituality. He leads worship centered on Christ, not against Him.


2. Exalting Himself as God in the Temple  

   The man of lawlessness "takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God" (2 Thess. 2:4). No evidence exists of Pope Leo XIV claiming divinity or demanding personal worship as God. Popes teach they are servants of Christ and successors of Peter, not God Himself. Catholic theology distinguishes the papacy from divine identity.


3. Blasphemy, Lawlessness, and Global Persecution  

   The Antichrist utters proud words and blasphemies against God, makes war on the saints, and conquers them (Rev. 13:5-7; Dan. 7:25). Pope Leo XIV's public record involves pastoral leadership, calls for peace, care for the poor, and moral guidance—not blasphemy, lawlessness, or violent persecution of believers. He continues emphasis on Catholic social teaching, not opposition to God or the saints.


4. Satanic Power, False Signs, and Deception  

   The Antichrist comes "by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders" to deceive those who reject truth (2 Thess. 2:9-10). There are no reports of Pope Leo XIV performing miracles (false or otherwise) to lead people away from Christ. His role is that of a visible church leader within historic Christianity.


5. Timing and Context  

   The Antichrist appears in connection with a great "rebellion" (apostasy) and precedes Christ's return in judgment (2 Thess. 2:3, 8). He is tied to end-times global political/religious upheaval, a 42-month authority period, and widespread worship of himself/the beast. Pope Leo XIV was elected through a normal conclave in 2025 as a 70-year-old administrator in a continuing line of popes. His papacy shows continuity with prior Catholic leadership, not sudden apocalyptic rebellion or satanic takeover.

Some historical Protestant traditions or modern speculation have labeled the papacy (or individual popes) as the Antichrist due to interpretive views of prophecy (e.g., seeing the "little horn" or "beast" as a religious-political power). However, these are interpretive applications, not direct matches to the literal biblical descriptions of a singular future figure who denies Christ outright and demands divine worship with miraculous deception. Pope Leo XIV's life, teachings, and actions align with orthodox Christian confession rather than opposition to it.

In summary, the biblical Antichrist is a deceiver who rejects core truths about Jesus, exalts himself blasphemously, and uses satanic power for global apostasy and persecution. Pope Leo XIV affirms Christ, serves within the Church, and shows no such traits. Claims otherwise appear to stem from pre-existing anti-papal biases rather than a close reading of Scripture or the facts of his papacy. Christians are called to test spirits (1 John 4:1) and remain vigilant for the true signs, but equating every pope—or this one—with the Antichrist does not hold up under biblical scrutiny. 

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Lucifer: Angel of Music & Human Mind Control

The Enigmatic Figure of Lucifer in Religious Narratives

Lucifer, often associated with the morning star, holds a complex and multifaceted role in various religious narratives. Traditionally, Lucifer is thought to have been a high-ranking angel, possibly even the chief musician in heaven, tasked with the creation and oversight of divine melodies. This role, deeply entwined with the celestial worship of God, underscores the importance of music as a divine medium of expression and communication.

The image of Lucifer as an angel of music comes from various scriptural references that denote his authority over music when he was in heaven. For instance, Isaiah 14:11 speaks of his fall from grace and the loss of his former glory and gifts, including his musical talents. The passage metaphorically mentions the "noise of thy viols," indicating the stringed instruments he had charge over. Hence, we have the devil and fiddle song and lore.  

Moreover, Ezekiel 28:13-15 describes a figure adorned with precious stones and skilled in music, which has been allegorically linked to Lucifer's pre-fall splendor. These verses highlight the craftsmanship of timbrels and pipes, prepared on the day of creation, suggesting a profound connection with musical instruments.

However, interpretations of these passages vary, and some consider the association of Lucifer with music as a misconception stemming from allegorical readings of texts that originally described earthly kings, such as the King of Tyre. This interpretation suggests that while the poetic language used in these scriptures is evocative of musical prowess, it may not directly refer to Lucifer as the angel of music.

The theological implications of Lucifer's role as the angel of music are significant. They reflect the idea that music is not merely an art form but a divine gift that was once under the stewardship of a being who was in perfect harmony with the Creator. The fall of Lucifer, then, represents a disruption of this harmony and a turning away from the divine purpose of music.

In cultural depictions, Lucifer's association with music has been portrayed in various forms, from literature to art, often symbolizing the tension between the sacred and the profane. The figure of Lucifer continues to captivate the imagination, serving as a reminder of the dual nature of beauty and the potential for pride to lead to downfall.

The narrative of Lucifer as the angel of music, whether interpreted literally or allegorically, invites reflection on the power of music to move the soul and its place within the spiritual realm. It is a testament to the enduring human fascination with the origins of music and its capacity to express the inexpressible, whether in the heights of heaven or the depths of the human experience.

It is no wonder why music is possibly the main means by which the devil influences humanity. In music today, we hear all kinds of evil messages about sex, lust, homosexuality, drugs, violence, killing, and even open blasphemy against God. Music is very hypnotical. It has a strong effect on the human mind, especially in impressionable children and teens.  It is no wonder why the devil would use this medium to corrupt humanity.  It hypnotizes, influences, and brainwashes humans with subliminal messages embellished with fancy tunes and beats.  

The Psychology Behind Music Stuck in Your Mind

Have you ever found yourself humming a tune without realizing it? Or perhaps there's a song that just won't leave your head, playing on an endless loop. This phenomenon is known as an "earworm," and it's a common experience that has intrigued psychologists and neuroscientists alike.

An earworm, scientifically referred to as involuntary musical imagery (INMI), is a catchy piece of music that continually repeats through a person's mind after it is no longer playing. Studies suggest that up to 98% of individuals experience earworms, with varying degrees of pleasure or annoyance.

So, what makes a song stick in our minds? Research indicates that certain traits make songs more likely to become earworms. These include a repetitive nature, the presence of unexpected intervals or unique features that stand out, and an emotional charge that resonates with the listener. Additionally, songs that are associated with memories or specific moments in our lives tend to have a stronger grip on our psyche.

The brain regions involved in the earworm experience include the auditory cortex, which is responsible for musical perception, and the temporal lobe areas like the hippocampus, which play a significant role in memory encoding and retrieval. The phenomenon also engages the phonological loop, a component of working memory that retains auditory information.

Interestingly, earworms are not just a quirk of the mind; they may have served an evolutionary purpose. Historically, music and rhyming were used to help people remember oral histories before the written word was commonplace. Our brains have evolved to remember these patterns, which explains why these snippets of music can get "stuck" in our minds.

While earworms are generally harmless and can even be enjoyable, they can become bothersome, especially if they disrupt one's peace or concentration. For those looking to dispel an unwelcome earworm, engaging in cognitive activities like puzzles or reading can help shift the brain's focus away from the repetitive tune. Another strategy is to listen to the song in its entirety, which may help complete the "unfinished" loop in the mind.

In conclusion, earworms are a fascinating intersection of music and psychology, highlighting the intricate ways in which our brains process and retain auditory information. Whether delightful or irritating, these persistent tunes underscore the power of music in human culture and cognition. For more insights into the captivating world of music psychology, stay tuned to our blog for future articles.

The Hypnotic Effect of Music: A Psychological Perspective

Music has a profound impact on the human psyche, often described as a universal language that transcends cultural barriers. It has the power to evoke emotions, stimulate memories, and even alter states of consciousness. One of the most fascinating aspects of music's influence is its hypnotic effect, a topic that has intrigued psychologists and researchers for centuries.

The concept of music as a form of hypnosis dates back to the practices of Mesmerism in the 18th century, where music played a pivotal role in inducing trance-like states. This historical context sets the stage for understanding the hypnotic power of music, which can be seen as a form of 'brainwashing' or a method to overwhelm listeners' self-control. The idea that music can lead to involuntary hypnosis, affecting autonomy and making individuals sexually vulnerable, has been a subject of debate and research over the years.

Modern psychology views the relationship between music and hypnosis as more psycho-social rather than physiologically deterministic. This perspective acknowledges the role of music in influencing group dynamics and behavioral changes, particularly in the context of religious rituals and warfare. However, the question remains: can music truly 'hypnotize' an audience?

Recent cognitive theories of hypnotic responding provide new insights into this phenomenon. For instance, the cold control theory of hypnosis suggests that hypnotic responses are not due to meeting expectations but rather violating them. This theory aligns with the idea that music can disrupt personal agency and create a sense of delusion about the source and reality of experiences.

The effect of hypnotic induction on music listening experiences has also been studied, revealing that high musical involvers experience increased imagery, physical sensations, positive feelings, and focused attention during music listening under hypnotic induction. This suggests that the hypnotic effect of music can enhance the listening experience, altering perceptions and consciousness.

Furthermore, music's ability to prompt synchrony and emotional states positions it as a medium for prosocial interactions. It facilitates cooperation, empathetic understanding, and social bonding, which can be beneficial in treatment settings or environments where group cohesion is valued.

In terms of emotional well-being, music's capacity to evoke powerful emotional responses, such as chills and thrills, is well-documented. Pleasurable music can lead to the release of neurotransmitters associated with reward, such as dopamine, making it an effective tool for mood alteration and stress relief.

In conclusion, the hypnotic effect of music is a multifaceted psychological phenomenon that encompasses the power of music to influence emotions, behaviors, and states of consciousness. While the notion of music as a form of hypnosis may have evolved from its Mesmeric roots, its impact on the human psyche remains undeniable. As research continues to unravel the complexities of this relationship, it becomes clear that music holds a unique position in its ability to shape our psychological experiences and social interactions.

So from a scientific perspective, we can see how music can be dangerous for the human mind. This is why it makes sense as to why we see music as the main means to spreading demonic influence.  At a youth conference I attended decades ago, Fr. Stan Fortuna of the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal said that music today is "audio porn." He was correct. We often think of porn as photos or videos on the internet depicting disgusting sexual things. However, we forget that much of today's popular secular music has strong sexual content.  It has gotten worse since Fr. Fortuna gave that talk in 2002!  

Back then the problems in musical lyrics were found in the content by Eminem, Jay-Z, the boy bands of the time, Marilyn Manson, and so far. Before them were Madonna, Boy George, and many others. Today we have Cardi B who raps about Wet Pu**ies or vaginas that are lubricating naturally due to arousal. We have songs like "Cake by the Ocean" which is a reference to anilingus or "eating butt."  Then we have songs like "Water" which is another reference to a lubricating vagina and Jalebi from a Canadian Rapper of Indian descent who raps about eating "Jalebi." "Jalebi" here is a reference to the vagina and engaging in cunnilingus or "eating pu**y."  These are oral sex acts.  We see this in Reggaeton and Spanish rap, where censors on the radio do not know what is being said in these songs. If they did, these songs would not be aired on the radio! They refer to women as "beyaka/bellaca" or "horny," and other Spanish sexual references to sex acts and body parts. 

Let us not get into the music of openly gay black rapper "Lil-Nas" whose music has raised eyebrows and is now openly accepted when in the past even the youth would frown on it due to its heavy gay imagery. However, things have changed today. The youth of today are more open to homosexuality and other perversions.  They are brainwashed by the music on the radio, MTV, social media, and so on. It spread like a virus, and we are seeing the effects.  Promiscuity is on the rise, and kids are being desensitized to sex and violence.  This is all rooted in original sin and concupiscence but manifests psychologically because sin uses the facets of the human being to manifest itself. 

Sexual Innuendos in Music: A Historical and Cultural Exploration
Sexual innuendos in music have been a staple of artistic expression for centuries, serving as a way for artists to explore themes of desire, intimacy, and human connection while often navigating societal norms and censorship. From subtle metaphors to overt suggestiveness, these lyrical and musical devices have evolved over time, reflecting cultural attitudes toward sexuality, gender, and freedom of expression. This post will trace the history of sexual innuendos in music, examine their role in various genres, analyze their cultural impact, and discuss the debates surrounding their use, with examples and sources to provide a comprehensive overview.

A Brief History of Sexual Innuendos in Music
Early Beginnings: Folk and Classical Traditions
Sexual innuendos in music date back to ancient times. In medieval Europe, troubadours often used coded language in their songs to express romantic and erotic themes. For example, the 13th-century song "L’autrier jost’una sebissa" by Marcabru employs pastoral imagery—such as a shepherdess and her "flock"—as a metaphor for seduction, a common trope in medieval poetry (Aubrey, 1997). Similarly, Renaissance madrigals often hid suggestive meanings in their lyrics. Thomas Morley’s 1594 madrigal "Now Is the Month of Maying" includes lines like “Fa la la la la,” which some scholars interpret as a playful allusion to sexual activity, masked by the song’s lighthearted tone (Kerman, 1988).
In African and African American oral traditions, innuendos were also prevalent. Work songs and spirituals often used double entendres to express forbidden desires or critique social conditions. For instance, the 19th-century folk song "Follow the Drinking Gourd," while a coded message for enslaved people escaping via the Underground Railroad, also contains layered meanings that some interpret as metaphors for freedom in both physical and sensual contexts (Holloway, 2005).
The 20th Century: Blues, Jazz, and Rock ‘n’ Roll
The early 20th century saw sexual innuendos become more explicit in genres like blues and jazz. Blues artists, particularly women like Bessie Smith and Ma Rainey, used suggestive lyrics to assert their agency and challenge societal norms. Smith’s 1927 song "Empty Bed Blues" includes lines like “He’s a deep sea diver with a stroke that can’t go wrong,” a clear metaphor for sexual prowess (Davis, 1998). These lyrics were bold for the time, especially given the racial and gender dynamics of the era, where Black women faced significant oppression.
Jazz continued this trend, with songs like Duke Ellington’s 1932 "It Don’t Mean a Thing (If It Ain’t Got That Swing)" using “swing” as a possible innuendo for sexual rhythm. By the 1950s, rock ‘n’ roll brought innuendos to a wider audience. Little Richard’s 1955 hit "Tutti Frutti" originally contained the line “Tutti Frutti, good booty,” which was changed to “Tutti Frutti, aw rooty” to make it more radio-friendly, though the suggestive energy remained (White, 1985).
The Modern Era: Pop, Hip-Hop, and Beyond
By the late 20th and early 21st centuries, sexual innuendos became more overt, reflecting changing cultural attitudes. Pop music embraced innuendos as a marketing tool. Madonna’s 1989 hit "Like a Virgin" plays with the double meaning of “touched for the very first time,” blending innocence with sensuality (Tetzlaff, 1993). Similarly, the 1990s saw boy bands like *NSYNC with songs like "Digital Get Down" (2000), which uses technology as a metaphor for virtual intimacy.
Hip-hop and R&B have been particularly explicit. Salt-N-Pepa’s 1991 song "Let’s Talk About Sex" mixes innuendo with directness, using phrases like “Let’s talk about all the good things and the bad things that may be” to open a dialogue about sexuality. More recently, artists like Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion have pushed boundaries with songs like "WAP" (2020), which, while less about innuendo and more about explicitness, still uses metaphors like “wet and gushy” to describe sexual desire (Bradley, 2021).

The Role of Sexual Innuendos Across Genres
Pop Music
In pop, innuendos often balance accessibility with provocation. The 2013 hit "Blurred Lines" by Robin Thicke uses lines like “I know you want it” to imply sexual consent, though its ambiguity sparked controversy over its message (Hess, 2013). Similarly, Dua Lipa’s 2020 song "Levitating" includes the line “I got you, moonlight, you’re my starlight,” which can be read as a romantic or sensual metaphor, depending on interpretation.
Rock and Alternative
Rock has a long history of innuendos, often with a rebellious edge. The Rolling Stones’ 1971 track "Brown Sugar" uses sugar as a metaphor for both interracial desire and drug use, a double entendre that stirred debate over its racial implications (Perrone, 2004). In alternative music, The 1975’s 2016 song "The Sound" includes the line “I’m so full of love, I could barely eat,” a subtle nod to the overwhelming nature of desire.
Country Music
Country music often cloaks innuendos in humor or domestic imagery. Garth Brooks’ 1993 song "That Summer" describes a young man’s coming-of-age with an older woman, using lines like “She had a need to feel the thunder” to imply sexual awakening. More recently, Kacey Musgraves’ 2018 track "Slow Burn" uses the metaphor of a gradual fire to describe a simmering romantic tension (Sexton, 2018).
Electronic and Dance
Dance music frequently uses rhythm and innuendo to evoke sensuality. The 2005 hit "Don’t Cha" by the Pussycat Dolls, with lines like “Don’t cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me,” plays on sexual competition, while the beat amplifies the song’s seductive tone (Billboard, 2005).

Cultural Impact and Debates
Empowerment vs. Objectification
Sexual innuendos in music can empower artists, particularly women, to reclaim their sexuality. Beyoncé’s 2013 song "Partition" uses innuendos like “Driver, roll up the partition please” to assert control over her desires, challenging traditional gender roles (hooks, 2016). However, critics argue that such lyrics can also perpetuate objectification, especially when driven by commercial interests. The controversy over "WAP" highlighted this tension—some praised its boldness, while others, like conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, called it “vulgar” and harmful to societal values (Shapiro, 2020).
Censorship and Freedom of Expression
Innuendos have often been a workaround for censorship. In the 1950s, radio stations banned songs with overt sexual content, leading artists to use metaphors. Elvis Presley’s 1956 hit "Hound Dog" was interpreted by some as a sexual metaphor, though it was originally about a cheating partner (Guralnick, 1994). Today, streaming platforms have reduced censorship, allowing for more explicit content, but debates persist over age-appropriateness and cultural impact.
Reflection of Societal Norms
Innuendos mirror societal attitudes toward sex. In the conservative 1950s, innuendos were subtle to avoid backlash. By the 1980s, the sexual revolution and rise of MTV made them more overt, as seen in Prince’s 1980 song "Little Red Corvette," where the car symbolizes a woman’s body (Royster, 2013). Today, the normalization of sexual discourse has led to a mix of innuendo and explicitness, reflecting a culture that is both more open and more polarized on the topic.

Why Sexual Innuendos Matter in Music
  1. Artistic Expression
    Innuendos allow artists to explore complex emotions and experiences in a way that’s both creative and accessible. They add layers of meaning, inviting listeners to interpret and engage with the music on a deeper level.
  2. Cultural Dialogue
    Songs with innuendos spark conversations about sexuality, gender, and power. They can challenge taboos, as seen with Madonna’s work, or reinforce stereotypes, as some argue with songs like "Blurred Lines."
  3. Commercial Appeal
    Sex sells, and innuendos are a time-tested way to attract listeners while maintaining a veneer of respectability. The playful suggestiveness of songs like The Weeknd’s 2015 hit "The Hills" (“I only call you when it’s half-past five”) keeps audiences intrigued without crossing into explicit territory.

Conclusion
Sexual innuendos in music are a fascinating lens through which to view the evolution of culture, art, and societal norms. From the coded metaphors of medieval ballads to the bold lyrics of modern hip-hop, they have allowed artists to navigate the delicate balance between expression and acceptability. While they can empower and entertain, they also raise questions about objectification, censorship, and cultural impact. As music continues to evolve, sexual innuendos will likely remain a powerful tool for artists to explore the timeless themes of love, desire, and human connection.
So those people who claim the devil does not exist are blind. We can see this master of heavenly music using his talents to destroy humanity due to envy as we read from the book of Wisdom.  This is why we must counter with grace-filled music that is inspiring and holy and not let music with catchy beats and coded lyrics brainwash our youth and keep them in a feral state desiring only sex, lust, pleasure, and violence.  
If you like posts like this, be sure to follow our podcast The Anointed Mic on X (formerly Twitter) @TheAnointedMic, On Instagram @TheAnointedMic, On Tiktok @TheAnointedMic, on YouTube @TheAnointedMic..  We will discuss music in all its aspects and present samples of it in our podcasts as we push back against Lucifer's brainwashing.


Sources
  • Aubrey, E. (1997). The Music of the Troubadours. Indiana University Press.
  • Kerman, J. (1988). Musicology. Harvard University Press.
  • Holloway, J. E. (2005). Africanisms in American Culture. Indiana University Press.
  • Davis, A. Y. (1998). Blues Legacies and Black Feminism. Pantheon Books.
  • White, C. (1985). The Life and Times of Little Richard. Harmony Books.
  • Tetzlaff, D. (1993). Metatextual Girl: Patriarchy, Postmodernism, and Madonna. Westview Press.
  • Bradley, R. N. (2021). Chronicling Stankonia: The Rise of the Hip-Hop South. UNC Press.
  • Hess, A. (2013). “Blurred Lines and the Problem of Consent.” Slate.
  • Perrone, P. (2004). “The Rolling Stones: Brown Sugar Controversy.” The Independent.
  • Sexton, P. (2018). “Kacey Musgraves’ Golden Hour: A Slow Burn Success.” Billboard.
  • Billboard. (2005). “Pussycat Dolls: Don’t Cha Review.” Billboard Magazine.
  • hooks, b. (2016). “Beyoncé’s Lemonade: A Lesson in Empowerment.” The Guardian.
  • Shapiro, B. (2020). “WAP and the Decline of Culture.” The Daily Wire.
  • Guralnick, P. (1994). Last Train to Memphis: The Rise of Elvis Presley. Little, Brown.
  • Royster, F. (2013). Sounding Like a No-No: Queer Sounds and Eccentric Acts in the Post-Soul Era. University of Michigan Press.


 

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1576) Jesus (734) God (722) Bible (600) Atheism (399) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (343) Liturgy of the Word (315) Atheist (279) Apologetics (265) Science (236) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (143) Liturgy (137) Blessed Virgin Mary (122) Abortion (97) Prayer (96) Gay (95) Philosophy (92) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (81) Psychology (74) Vatican (74) Physics (73) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (60) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (53) Vatican II (50) Biology (48) Health (47) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (42) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) priests (32) Death (31) NYPD (31) Priesthood (28) Space (28) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Religious Freedom (27) Eucharist (26) Evangelization (25) Donald Trump (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) academia (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)