Pages
- Home
- About Sacerdotus
- Prayers
- Contact
- Advertise
- Donate
- Shop
- Visitors
- Debate
- Rationally Faithful
- Catholic Faith Sharing
- Sacerdotus Podcasts
- Sacerdotus Books
- Sacerdotus TV
- Pregnant? Need help? Abortion Alternatives
- Become a Contributor
- Statement from Sacerdotus Ministry on the Crackdown of Illegal Immigration Under the Trump Administration
- Sacerdotus Ministry Statement on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act: A Catholic Perspective
Monday, September 30, 2013
John XXII & John Paul II to be Canonized
This confirms previous reports.
John XXII was born Angelo Roncalli and served as a military chaplain during World War I. He was responsible for the Vatican II council which helped the Church keep up with the modern times but without changing her teachings. He was a humble Pope who later developed stomach cancer.
John Paul II is probably more known today especially by the youth. He was born Karol Wojtyla in Krakow, Poland. He took dealt with wartime in his native land and ministered to the youth. He was an actor and later was ordained a priest.
Both Popes were very humble, holy and in touch with the people. They both bore the Cross of Christ throughout their lives, especially during their pontificates where they suffered greatly.
This is a great time for the Church. May Blessed John XXIII and John Paul II pray for us. Rumor has it that both living popes, Benedict XVI and Francis will celebrate the Mass in April 2014!
Source:
http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=126865
http://www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=126863
Sunday, September 29, 2013
St. Michael the Archangel
Introduction
St. Michael the Archangel holds a singular place in the spiritual imagination of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, embodying divine authority, spiritual warfare, and intercessory power. His name, derived from the Hebrew Mi-ka-el ("Who is like God?"), is both a question and a proclamation, asserting the supremacy of God over all creation. As a celestial warrior, protector of the faithful, and leader of the heavenly host, Michael’s significance transcends mere angelic status, positioning him as a symbol of divine justice, mercy, and eschatological hope. This essay examines St. Michael’s multifaceted role through a theological, historical, and cultural lens, tracing his depiction in sacred texts, the evolution of his veneration, and his enduring influence in art, literature, and modern devotion. Drawing from scriptural sources, patristic writings, medieval accounts, and contemporary scholarship, this study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of St. Michael’s significance across time and traditions.
Theological Significance of St. Michael
In Christian theology, St. Michael is preeminent among the archangels, a figure whose roles encompass spiritual warfare, intercession, and eschatological protection. His theological significance is rooted in his scriptural appearances, which portray him as a defender of God’s people and a combatant against evil. The Book of Daniel in the Old Testament introduces Michael as a celestial protector, describing him as "one of the chief princes" who aids the angel Gabriel against the "prince of Persia" (Daniel 10:13). This passage establishes Michael’s role in spiritual warfare, a theme amplified in Daniel 12:1, where he is called the "great prince" who stands guard over Israel during a "time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations." Here, Michael emerges as a guardian of divine order, ensuring the safety of God’s chosen people in apocalyptic times.
In the New Testament, Michael’s role is further developed. The Epistle of Jude (1:9) recounts his dispute with Satan over the body of Moses, drawn from apocryphal traditions such as the Assumption of Moses. In this episode, Michael refrains from pronouncing judgment himself, saying, "The Lord rebuke you!" This restraint underscores his humility and obedience to divine authority, qualities that early theologians like Gregory the Great emphasized in their writings. Gregory, in his Homilies on the Gospels, portrays Michael as a model of divine service, balancing strength with submission to God’s will.
The most dramatic depiction of Michael appears in the Book of Revelation (12:7-9), where he leads the heavenly armies against Satan, the "great dragon," and casts him out of heaven. This cosmic battle establishes Michael as the archetype of the Church Militant, a warrior who ensures the triumph of good over evil. Theologically, this victory is not merely historical but eschatological, pointing to the ultimate defeat of Satan at the end of time. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica (Part I, Question 113), places Michael at the head of the angelic hierarchy, arguing that his role as leader of the archangels reflects his unique proximity to God’s will.
In Catholic theology, Michael is one of three archangels named in Scripture (alongside Gabriel and Raphael), and his intercessory role is formalized in devotional practices. The Leonine Prayer, instituted by Pope Leo XIII in 1884, invokes Michael’s protection against "the wickedness and snares of the devil," reflecting his role as a spiritual shield. In Eastern Orthodoxy, Michael is celebrated as the "Commander of the Bodiless Powers," a title that underscores his leadership among angels. The Synaxis of the Archangel Michael and the Other Bodiless Powers, observed on November 8, emphasizes his role in the cosmic order, guiding the faithful through spiritual and temporal challenges.
Michael’s theological significance lies in his dual role as warrior and intercessor. As a warrior, he confronts evil directly, embodying divine justice. As an intercessor, he bridges heaven and earth, advocating for humanity before God’s throne. This duality makes him a potent symbol of divine intervention, resonating across Christian traditions and beyond.
Scriptural Foundations
St. Michael’s scriptural appearances, though limited, are foundational to his theological and devotional roles. In the Old Testament, the Book of Daniel provides the earliest references. In Daniel 10:13, Michael is introduced as a celestial ally, assisting Gabriel in a spiritual conflict against the "prince of Persia," a term scholars interpret as a demonic or opposing spiritual force. This passage establishes Michael as a warrior in the unseen realm, engaging in battles that mirror earthly struggles. Daniel 12:1 further elevates Michael’s role, describing him as the protector of Israel during an apocalyptic crisis. The phrase "great prince" suggests a position of authority, aligning Michael with divine providence.
In the New Testament, Jude 1:9 draws on Jewish apocryphal traditions to depict Michael’s dispute with Satan over Moses’ body. This episode, absent from canonical Old Testament texts, likely derives from the Assumption of Moses, a text circulating in early Jewish and Christian communities. Michael’s restraint in this encounter, refusing to curse Satan and deferring to God’s judgment, highlights his humility and obedience, qualities that distinguish him from the rebellious angels. This episode also underscores Michael’s role as a guardian of the righteous, ensuring the proper treatment of Moses’ body.
The Book of Revelation (12:7-9) offers the most vivid portrayal of Michael, describing his leadership in the "war in heaven." The passage reads: "Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought back. But he was not strong enough, and they lost their place in heaven." This victory is a turning point in the apocalyptic narrative, symbolizing the expulsion of evil from the divine realm. Scholars like Richard Bauckham argue that this passage draws on Jewish traditions of angelic warfare, adapting them to a Christian eschatological framework.
These scriptural references, though brief, provide a robust foundation for Michael’s veneration. They portray him as a protector, warrior, and servant of God, roles that shaped his theological and devotional significance in later centuries.
Historical Development of Veneration
The veneration of St. Michael emerged early in Christian history, rooted in Jewish angelology and amplified by Christian apocalypticism. By the 4th century, devotion to Michael was widespread, particularly in the Eastern Church. One of the earliest sites of veneration was the Michaelion, a shrine in Constantinople attributed to Emperor Constantine. According to legend, Michael appeared to Constantine, prompting the construction of this sanctuary, which became a center for healing and pilgrimage. The Michaelion blended Christian devotion with pre-Christian traditions of sacred springs, illustrating Michael’s adaptability as a figure of divine protection.
In the West, the apparition of St. Michael on Monte Gargano in Italy (circa 490 CE) marked a turning point in his cult. The Liber de apparitione Sancti Michaelis recounts how Michael appeared to a bishop, declaring a cave on the mountain sacred. This event led to the establishment of the Sanctuary of Monte Sant’Angelo, a major pilgrimage site that drew devotees from across Europe. The apparition emphasized Michael’s role as a territorial protector, a theme reinforced by his association with high places, such as Mont Saint-Michel in France, founded in 708 CE after a vision to Bishop Aubert of Avranches. These sites, often perched on rocky heights, symbolized Michael’s elevated status as a celestial guardian.
During the Middle Ages, Michael’s veneration grew alongside chivalric ideals. Knights and rulers invoked him as a patron of warriors, reflecting his scriptural role as a heavenly commander. The Carolingian Empire, under Charlemagne, promoted devotion to Michael, with churches dedicated to him across the Frankish realm. Charlemagne’s adoption of Michael as a patron reflected the archangel’s alignment with imperial authority and divine protection.
Theologians like Thomas Aquinas further formalized Michael’s role in the 13th century, situating him within the angelic hierarchy. Aquinas argued that Michael’s leadership of the archangels reflected his unique mission to combat evil and guide souls. This theological framework underpinned Michael’s prominence in medieval liturgy, particularly in the Missale Romanum, where prayers invoked his intercession.
The Counter-Reformation reinvigorated Michael’s cult, particularly in Catholic Europe. The Jesuits, champions of the Church Militant, promoted devotion to angels, and Michael became a symbol of resistance against Protestantism and secularism. Pope Leo XIII’s vision in 1884, reportedly witnessing Satan’s challenge to God, led to the composition of the Prayer to St. Michael, recited after Low Masses until the Second Vatican Council. This prayer, with its plea for Michael to "thrust into hell Satan and all the evil spirits," reflected the Church’s perception of spiritual threats in an era of modernization.
In the Eastern Church, Michael’s veneration remained strong, particularly in the Byzantine tradition. The Synaxis of the Archangel Michael became a major feast, and icons of Michael adorned churches, emphasizing his role as a protector of the Orthodox faithful. His cult also spread to Slavic regions, where he became a patron of warriors and rulers.
Cultural Impact
St. Michael’s influence extends far beyond theology, permeating art, literature, and popular culture. In medieval art, Michael is frequently depicted as a warrior, clad in armor, slaying a dragon or weighing souls at the Last Judgment. Byzantine mosaics, such as those in Ravenna’s Basilica of Sant’Apollinare in Classe, portray Michael with a serene yet commanding presence, balancing majesty and militancy. Gothic cathedrals, like Chartres, feature Michael in stained glass, his sword raised against the dragon, symbolizing the triumph of good.
Renaissance artists further idealized Michael, emphasizing his beauty and strength. Raphael’s St. Michael Vanquishing Satan (1518) depicts a youthful, dynamic Michael, his foot on Satan’s neck, embodying divine power. Guido Reni’s St. Michael the Archangel (1636) presents a more contemplative Michael, his gaze fixed heavenward, blending strength with spiritual depth. These artistic representations shaped perceptions of Michael as both a warrior and a divine intermediary.
In literature, Michael appears prominently in John Milton’s Paradise Lost (1667), where he leads the angelic armies against Satan. Milton’s portrayal emphasizes Michael’s loyalty and martial prowess, presenting him as a foil to the rebellious Lucifer. Medieval mystery plays also featured Michael, often as a judge of souls, reinforcing his eschatological role.
In popular culture, Michael’s image has been adapted to modern sensibilities. Films like Michael (1996) and television series like Supernatural reimagine him as a charismatic or heroic figure, sometimes diverging from theological roots but retaining his association with protection and justice. Video games, such as Devil May Cry and Dark Souls, draw on Michael’s iconography, portraying angelic warriors inspired by his legacy.
Devotional practices, such as the Chaplet of St. Michael and the Scapular of St. Michael, remain popular in Catholic communities, reflecting his ongoing spiritual relevance. Michael is also a patron of professions facing danger, including police officers, firefighters, and soldiers, who invoke him for courage and protection. His patronage extends to nations and cities, such as Ukraine, Brussels, and Kyiv, where he is revered as a guardian of cultural and spiritual identity.
St. Michael in Comparative Contexts
Michael’s significance transcends Christianity, appearing in Jewish and Islamic traditions. In Judaism, he is a protector of Israel, a role that parallels his Christian depiction as a guardian of the Church. The Zohar and other Kabbalistic texts associate Michael with the sephirah of Chesed (mercy), emphasizing his benevolent aspect. In Islam, Michael (Mika’il) is one of four archangels, tasked with providing sustenance and interceding for humanity. The Qur’an mentions him alongside Gabriel, highlighting his role in divine providence.
This cross-traditional reverence underscores Michael’s universal appeal as a figure of protection and justice. His adaptability allows him to resonate in diverse contexts, from monotheistic faiths to esoteric traditions, where he is often invoked in rituals seeking divine favor.
Contemporary Relevance
In the modern era, devotion to St. Michael has experienced a resurgence, particularly among Catholics responding to spiritual and cultural challenges. The reinstatement of the Prayer to St. Michael in some parishes after 2018 reflects concerns about moral decline, secularism, and spiritual warfare. Pope Francis, in 2018, encouraged the faithful to recite this prayer, citing Michael’s role as a protector against evil.
Michael’s image as a warrior resonates in a world grappling with conflict, division, and uncertainty. His patronage of professions like law enforcement and the military reflects his enduring role as a guardian in times of crisis. Devotional movements, such as the Militia of St. Michael, emphasize spiritual warfare, encouraging believers to invoke Michael’s intercession against personal and societal challenges.
In popular culture, Michael’s legacy persists, albeit in secularized forms. His image as a protector inspires narratives of heroism and resilience, from literature to media. The continued popularity of pilgrimage sites like Monte Sant’Angelo and Mont Saint-Michel attests to his enduring spiritual and cultural significance.
Conclusion
St. Michael the Archangel remains a towering figure in religious and cultural history, embodying the triumph of divine justice over evil, the protection of the faithful, and the intercession of heaven on behalf of humanity. His scriptural roles as a warrior, guardian, and servant of God laid the foundation for his theological significance, which was amplified by centuries of veneration. From early Christian shrines to medieval cathedrals, from Renaissance art to modern devotion, Michael’s legacy is one of enduring relevance. His cross-traditional appeal, spanning Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, underscores his universal role as a symbol of divine authority and mercy. In an era of uncertainty, St. Michael continues to inspire faith, courage, and hope, serving as a celestial protector for believers across the globe.
Sources
1. The Holy Bible, New Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition. Catholic Bible Press, 2007.
2. Gregory the Great. Homilies on the Gospels. Translated by David Hurst, Cistercian Publications, 1990.
3. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Christian Classics, 1981.
4. Johnson, Richard F. Saint Michael the Archangel in Medieval English Legend. Boydell Press, 2005.
5. Arnold, John Charles. The Footprints of Michael the Archangel: The Formation and Diffusion of a Saintly Cult, c. 300-c. 800. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
6. Milton, John. Paradise Lost. Edited by Gordon Teskey, Norton, 2005.
7. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican Press, 1994.
8. The Qur’an. Translated by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, Oxford University Press, 2004.
9. Bauckham, Richard. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
10. Liber de apparitione Sancti Michaelis. Translated by John Charles Arnold, in The Footprints of Michael the Archangel, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Saturday, September 28, 2013
NJ Judge Okays Gay Marriage
This is scary indeed. Why have elections and representatives if a single judge can decide what is law in our states?
Governor Chris Christie has vowed to fight this in court by appealing to a higher court. Hopefully, this irresponsible ruling that is an affront to our legislative process will be knocked down and this judge removed from the bench.
There is no place for judicial activism in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave! Our Founding Fathers came together to formulate a government whose power would come from the people. This government cannot become a monarchy or dictatorship. For this reason, 'checks and balances' exists so that no branch of the government can have too much power. Having a judge decide what is law is wrong and contrary to the wishes of our Founding Fathers.
Source:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GAY_MARRIAGE_NJ?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-09-28-00-50-59
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Twitter Atheists Whining
@anidiotiknow @dawkinsassange @twitter @RosaResurrected she's gone again? This is becoming such BS!!!
— Sherrie (@broncosatheist) September 28, 2013
@dawkinsassange @VorianK @twitter @RosaResurrected Rosa has been the victim of many attacks on twitter, there was no reason for this.
— Jossi (@poochalot) September 28, 2013
@VorianK I will posting every blog until @rosaresurrected comes back:) @secular_oz @twitter
— Godfrey Freeman (@dawkinsassange) September 28, 2013
@DonQuixote1950 Which denotes a problem. Religious loons gang-up on @RosaResurrected & report as spam.
— Christianne Smith (@ChristiAnne67) September 28, 2013
It is plain that @twitter is controlled by a bunch of #religious thugs. /@RosaRubicondior @RosaResurrected #atheism #twitter
— secular_oz (@secular_oz) September 28, 2013
“@dawkinsassange: Dear @twitter reinstate @RosaResurrected I believe that she is a victim of a false spam blocking campaign. #NotRight!
— Nobodysfool (@anidiotiknow) September 28, 2013
@newfers fwiw, @RosaResurrected never spammed me. Care to offer details? /@dawkinsassange @twitter
— secular_oz (@secular_oz) September 28, 2013
Would @Twitter suspend Billy Graham? Of course not! Yet they suspend @RosaResurrected / @RosaRubicondior? Go figure! :( #Twitter #GodMob
— secular_oz (@secular_oz) September 28, 2013
Twitter troll "Rosa Rubicondior's" reincarnation as "Rosa Resurrected" was sent back to the purgatory of dead accounts once again. It is obvious why he was suspended again: abuse/spam/copyright/trademark.
His previous account @rosarubicondior is permanently suspended. I warned him this would happen if he continued his abuse, but he continued. My post "Rosie on Probation" highlighted that Twitter was monitoring this troll and those who promoted his lies and spam links. "Rosa" disregarded this and continued his abuse. His atheist minions continued as well and are now whining that he is suspended again.
Are these people stupid?
Apparently so! If I am warning them of what's going on and telling them how to avoid suspension, then why would they do the things that would bring about suspension?
They are now whining and complaining that religious people are spam reporting Rubicondior and other atheists. This is not so. While I did tell people to report any abuse they encounter, this is not a campaign. Twitter asked me for evidence of this abuse, so I was just doing what they requested. Moreover, Twitter has changed its rules and how it responds to abuse. I wrote about it here: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/07/twitter-abuse-changes.html
Twitter Abuse Changes
They will now take more seriously any reports made to them. Before, reports made against abuse were brushed off as a "free speech" conflict of interest. However, after some have used Twitter to make death and rape threats, they have now changed their handling of reports. Moreover, they are also getting tough on spammers who use their site to spam. Automation will no longer be allowed. "Rosa" uses Gremlin and other spam bot applications in order to tweet his spam links throughout the day on a schedule. He has also sent unsolicited mentions to random people and blocked them in order to avoid getting a response from them and used automated following apps in order to get his 7500 followers again. This is against twitter's rules.
Here are more of the things in detail of what Rosa Rubicondior/Resurrected did in order to bring upon himself suspension:
Spamming
He used his @rosarubicondior account and @rosaresurrected to spam all day by posting duplicate tweets linking his followers to his poorly written and scientifically illiterate blog which I have refuted many times.
Unsolicited Mentions
Moreover, he has also sent unsolicited mentions to Christians and other people of faith in an attempt to start an argument. Often times, he would mention someone and then block that person so that the person has no way to reply to his 'hit and run' mention. This of course is against Twitter's rules. Twitter users cannot abuse the spam report feature in this way.
Using Automated Programs
In order to tweet his spam nearly every couple of minutes, Rubicondior relied on bots programmed to tweet at certain intervals throughout the day with specific tweets. He also used bots to add followers to his new account. This is also against Twitter's rules.
Abuse
Within his tweets, Rubicondior abused other users by insulting them, threatening them, being condescending and by baiting them to engage him. This includes other atheists who don't agree with him! He has also been posting the information of a minor named 'Manuel' or 'Manny' in order to defame the child as well as discredit me and others who he finds a threat. When questioned to provide evidence of this child and his connection to me or others, he disappears and ignores the requests. Twitter has been monitoring this child abuse. They have seen my license as well as the licenses of those who Rubicondior claimed is me or "Manuel/Manny." It is futile to even make the connection because twitter knows everyone's identity. This is why Rubicondior got suspended faster than usual.
Posting Personal Information
It is against Twitter's rules to post someone's private information. Rubicondior took it upon himself to post a child's information, including his school's address and other sensitive information that can put the child in danger.
Trademark/Copyright Laws
It is against Twitter's rules to violate Trademark and Copyright laws. "Rosa Rubicondior" is not a real name. He is using a comic book anime character as his online presence as well as the photo of a Halloween old lady mask. The aforementioned are creations of other people and hence, "Rubicondior" broke Trademark and Copyright laws by claiming them as his own. See more here: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/07/what-is-sacerdotus-doing.html
Impersonation of an Individual or Entity
Rubicondior has many overlapping accounts which he uses to spam. Some accounts are even fake theist accounts that he uses as sock puppets. This is against Twitter's rules. I will post all the known accounts that he uses in a later post so everyone can watch out for them and report each to Twitter.
As you can see, Rubicondior has quite a rap sheet. Ironically, he was suspended a year later on the same day that he lost his debate with me by running away and not completing his agreement to debate me. God works in strange ways indeed! See more here: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/08/why-was-rosa-rubicondior-suspended.html
If atheists want to tweet without being suspended then they must follow Twitter's rules. They also must not tweet any mentions to random people no matter how tempted they are pressured into responding to a tweet that was provocative. My profile says to contact me on my blog for this reason. I understand my tweets are provocative and people feel the burn to respond; however, you can do so via my blog without worrying about being suspended on twitter. There is no reason to spam my mentions with tweets when you can send me a well organized email with your comments or questions. Moreover, I will not read mentions and any mentions with vulgarity will be reported.
Moreover, atheists must not promote Rosa's spam links. His blog is blacklisted as spam by Twitter. Also, the name "Manny/Manuel" is also known to Twitter as the child Rubicondior is abusing. Twitter has seen my driver's license as well as the ID's of other accounts Rubicondior has claimed to belong to me. That being said, it is silly saying I am "Manny/Manuel" or account abc when Twitter has verified my identity. Therefore, any mention of this child will bring Twitter support into play. Any atheists/accounts who promoted Rosa's blog and mention this child will be monitored and suspended. There is no way around this.
"Rosa Resurrected" was doing fine until he began tweeting links written as "Manny's list..." and mentioning "Manuel." When he did this, that is when he got suspended again. Again, twitter is monitoring this.
I have warned atheists about this, but they see it as some joke. They are not laughing now, neither is "Rosa." One atheist mentioned why Billy Graham is not suspended, well the answer is obvious: HE DOESN'T ACT LIKE AN IMBECILE ON TWITTER.
So to my atheist friends, stop the whining. There is no crusade against atheists and no vendetta against Rubicondior. All of you are abusing Twitter and are feeling the heavy hand of support. Get over it and behave. Most likely, Rubicondior will never be allowed to tweet again since his blog and behavior is known to twitter and he is a repeat offender. His blog is also being targeted for removal, so don't get too used to it.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Rosa Resurrected Suspended!
The reincarnation of twitter troll @Rosarubicondior "@rosaresurrected" is suspended again. This guy never learns that twitter won't tolerate his abuse, spam and so forth.
The days of atheists using twitter to abuse are over.
Atheist Mom Converted by Daughter
A twelve year old child prodigy who taught herself how to paint and is also picking up piano quickly has aided in the conversion of her mother who was an atheist. The girl claims to have had visions of Christ and Heaven and painted them with such great detail that they began to make her mother think: Where did these images come from and how did her daughter get such a detailed image from her imagination?
This is an interesting story considering atheists love to claim that people are born atheists and that in order for one to believe in God, one must be indoctrinated. This brings doubt to this claim because this young girl came from an atheist background with no knowledge or exposure to religious belief. Was this the VMAT2 gene working or was it God who was really giving this young girl these images to paint?
In any event, the mother left atheism behind.
Source:
http://ipost.christianpost.com/news/twelve-year-old-with-atheist-mom-paints-shocking-pictures-of-heaven-and-jesus-and-wins-her-to-christ-11206/
http://nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/2239/Akiane-Kramarik-Child-Prodigy.aspx
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Benedict XVI Owns Atheist
The letter was written in response to mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi's book, "Dear Pope, I write to you" where he presents scientism as the only position all people should adhere to and critique's Pope Benedict XVI's papacy and writings. In the letter, Pope Emeritus responds to his handling of the sex abuse scandals and even pokes fun at Dawkins and some of his ideas calling them "science fiction."
Regarding the sex abuse claims, Pope Emeritus wrote:
"I have never tried to hide these things. That the power of evil penetrate to such an extent in the inner world of faith is for us a suffering which, on the one hand, we have to endure, while, on the other, we must at the same time, do everything possible to ensure that such cases do not repeated."
Benedict XVI then mocks the strange ideas regarding evolution that Dawkins and other atheists propagate:
"There is, moreover, science fiction in a big way just even within the theory of evolution. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is a classic example of science fiction. The great Jacques Monod wrote the sentences that he has inserted in his work certainly just as science fiction. I quote: "The emergence of tetrapod vertebrates … draws its origin from the fact that a primitive fish" chose "to go and explore the land, on which, however, was unable to move except jumping clumsily and thus creating, as a result of a modification of behavior, the selective pressure due to which would have developed the sturdy limbs of tetrapods. Among the descendants of this bold explorer, Magellan of this evolution, some can run at a speed of over 70 miles per hour."
Pope Emeritus proceeds to own the atheist by saying that his 'religion of mathematics/science' does not answer or explain the human realities of "freedom, love and evil." He writes:
"I'm amazed that with just one stroke you eliminate freedom, which has existed and is the fundamental principle of the modern era."
"Whatever neurobiology says or doesn't say about freedom, this is present as a decisive reality in the actual unfolding of our history, and it must be taken into consideration."
Benedict XVI then in his known humility acknowledge that he was a bit harsh in his criticism and ended the letter by saying that "frankness is part of dialogue."

Benedict XVI explains why frankness is necessary. We have to be direct with atheists and even mock their ideas showing how they are ridiculous.
Pope Emeritus mocks how Dawkin's ideas make no sense and are a stretch of the imaginary. Atheists often use science and stretch is to the point that it makes no sense. As he noted, Pope Emeritus told this atheist how relying on nature as the cause of the universe really does not disqualify God nor does it really answer anything. It becomes a "nature of gaps" fallacy.
I am glad Pope Benedict XVI is still active. I relate to him a lot in that he loves academia, reading and loves to refute literature just like I like to do on my blogs and offline.
Here is the full text of his letter:
My opinion about your book as a whole, however, is in itself rather mixed. I read some parts with enjoyment and profit. In other parts, however, I marveled at a certain aggressiveness and dell'avventatezza argument. (...)
Several times, she pointed out to me that theology would be science fiction. In this respect, I'm surprised that you, however, feel my book worthy of discussion as follows. Let me suggest on this issue four points:
1. It is fair to say that "science" in the strictest sense of the word it is just math, while I learned from you that even here yet distinction should be made between arithmetic and geometry. In all the scientific specific subjects each time has its own form, according to the particularity of its object. It is essential that you apply a verifiable method, excludes arbitrariness and ensure rationality in their different ways.
2. She should at least recognize that, in history and in that of philosophy, theology has produced lasting results.
3. An important function of theology is to keep religion tied to reason and reason to religion. Both functions are of paramount importance for humanity. In my dialogue with Habermas have shown that there are pathologies of religion and - no less dangerous - pathologies of reason. They both need each other, and keep them constantly connected is an important task of theology.
4. Science fiction exists, moreover, in the context of many sciences. What She exposes the theories about the beginning and the end of the world in Heisenberg, Schrödinger etc.., The designerei as science fiction in the best sense: they are visions and anticipations, to arrive at a true knowledge, but are, in fact, only imaginations with we try to get closer to reality. There is, moreover, science fiction in a big way just even within the theory of evolution. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is a classic example of science fiction. The great Jacques Monod wrote the sentences that he has inserted in his work certainly just as science fiction. I quote: "The emergence of tetrapod vertebrates ... draws its origin from the fact that a primitive fish" chose "to go and explore the land, on which, however, was unable to move except jumping clumsily and thus creating, as a result of a modification of behavior, the selective pressure due to which would have developed the sturdy limbs of tetrapods. Among the descendants of this bold explorer, Magellan of this evolution, some can run at a speed of over 70 miles per hour ... " (Quoted according to the Italian edition of The Chance and Necessity, Milan 2001, p. 117 ff.).
In the issues discussed so far it is a serious dialogue, for which I - as I have said repeatedly - I am grateful. The situation is different in the chapter on the priest and Catholic morality, and by still another in the chapters on Jesus As for what you say moral abuse of minors by priests, I can - as you know - just take note with deep concern . I have never tried to hide these things. That the power of evil penetrate to such an extent in the inner world of faith is for us a suffering which, on the one hand, we have to endure, while, on the other, we must at the same time, do everything possible to ensure that such cases do not repeated. Nor is it reassuring to know that, according to the research of sociologists, the percentage of priests are guilty of these crimes is not higher than that found in other similar professions. In any case, you should not submit this deviation ostentatiously as if it were a specific filth of Catholicism.
If you do not remain silent about evil in the Church, we must not, however, silenced even by the great shining path of goodness and purity, that the Christian faith has traced through the centuries. You have to remember the great figures and even that faith has produced - by Benedict of Nursia and his sister Scholastica, Francis and Clare of Assisi, Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross, the great saints of charity as Vincent de Paul and Camillo de Lellis to Mother Teresa of Calcutta and the great and noble figures of the nineteenth century Turin. It is also true today that faith leads many people to selfless love, in service to others, sincerity and justice. (...)
What you say about Jesus is not worthy of his rank science. If you question arises as to whether Jesus, after all, we did not know anything about Him, as a historical figure, nothing ascertainable, then I can only invite so decided to become a bit 'more competent from a historical point of view. I recommend this especially for the four volumes that Martin Hengel (exegete from the Protestant Theological Faculty of Tübingen) published together with Mary Schwemer: it is an excellent example of historical accuracy and very broad historical information. In the face of this, what you say about Jesus is talking reckless that should not be repeated. Exegesis that have been written too many things of lack of seriousness is, unfortunately, an indisputable fact. The American seminary of Jesus you cite the pages 105 ff. only confirms again what Albert Schweitzer had noticed about the Leben-Jesu-Forschung (Research on the life of Jesus) and that is that the so-called "historical Jesus" is mostly reflects ideas of the authors. These forms of botched historical work, however, have no influence on the importance of serious historical research, which has led us to true knowledge and confident about the announcement and the figure of Jesus
(...) I also have forcefully rejected his claim (p. 126) that I presented the historical-critical exegesis as a tool of the Antichrist. Treating the story of Jesus' temptations, I have only taken Soloviev's thesis, according to which the historical-critical exegesis can also be used by the antichrist - which is an indisputable fact. At the same time, however, always - and in particular in the preface to the first volume of my book on Jesus of Nazareth - I explained clearly that the historical-critical exegesis is necessary for a faith that does not propose myths with historical images, but calls for a genuine historicity and therefore must present the historical reality of his claims in a scientific manner. For this is not even correct that you tell me that I would be interested only in the meta: quite the contrary, all my efforts are aimed to show that the Jesus described in the Gospels is also the real historical Jesus, that it is story really happened. (...)
With the 19 chapter of your book back to the positive aspects of your dialogue with my thinking. (...) Even if your interpretation of John 1,1 is very far from what the evangelist meant, however, there is a convergence that is important. If you, however, wants to replace God with "Nature", the question remains, who or what is this nature. Nowhere She defines it thus appears as a deity and irrational which explains nothing. But I want to especially note further that in His religion of mathematics three basic themes of human existence are not considered: freedom, love and evil. I'm surprised that you just nod with a liquid that while freedom was and is the core value of modern times. Love, in his book, does not appear on the evil and also there is no information. Whatever the neurobiology say or do not say about freedom in the real drama of our history as it is actually crucial and must be taken into account. But His religion mathematics knows any information over evil. A religion that ignores these fundamental questions is empty.
Ill. mo Mr. Professor, my criticism of your book in part is tough. But the dialogue is part frankness, and only then can grow knowledge. She was very frank and so I accept that it is. In any case, however, I rate very positively the fact that you, through His deal with my Introduction to Christianity, he sought a dialogue so open with the faith of the Catholic Church and that, despite all the odds, the central part, not missing altogether convergences.
With cordial greetings and every good wish for your work.
- See more at: http://en.apocalisselaica.net/radar-laicita/cronache-laiche/ratzinger-scrive-a-odifreddi-mai-coperto-abusi#sthash.IWR1jU4g.dpuf
Ill. mo Odifreddi Mr. Professor, (...) I would like to thank you for trying to the last detail to compare with my book, and so with my faith, just that is mostly what I meant in my address to the Roman Curia on the occasion of Christmas 2009. I have to thank for the way he treated loyal my text, seeking earnestly to do it justice.
My opinion about your book as a whole, however, is in itself rather mixed. I read some parts with enjoyment and profit. In other parts, however, I marveled at a certain aggressiveness and dell'avventatezza argument. (...)
Several times, she pointed out to me that theology would be science fiction. In this respect, I'm surprised that you, however, feel my book worthy of discussion as follows. Let me suggest on this issue four points:
1. It is fair to say that "science" in the strictest sense of the word it is just math, while I learned from you that even here yet distinction should be made between arithmetic and geometry. In all the scientific specific subjects each time has its own form, according to the particularity of its object. It is essential that you apply a verifiable method, excludes arbitrariness and ensure rationality in their different ways.
2. She should at least recognize that, in history and in that of philosophy, theology has produced lasting results.
3. An important function of theology is to keep religion tied to reason and reason to religion. Both functions are of paramount importance for humanity. In my dialogue with Habermas have shown that there are pathologies of religion and - no less dangerous - pathologies of reason. They both need each other, and keep them constantly connected is an important task of theology.
4. Science fiction exists, moreover, in the context of many sciences. What She exposes the theories about the beginning and the end of the world in Heisenberg, Schrödinger etc.., The designerei as science fiction in the best sense: they are visions and anticipations, to arrive at a true knowledge, but are, in fact, only imaginations with we try to get closer to reality. There is, moreover, science fiction in a big way just even within the theory of evolution. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is a classic example of science fiction. The great Jacques Monod wrote the sentences that he has inserted in his work certainly just as science fiction. I quote: "The emergence of tetrapod vertebrates ... draws its origin from the fact that a primitive fish" chose "to go and explore the land, on which, however, was unable to move except jumping clumsily and thus creating, as a result of a modification of behavior, the selective pressure due to which would have developed the sturdy limbs of tetrapods. Among the descendants of this bold explorer, Magellan of this evolution, some can run at a speed of over 70 miles per hour ... " (Quoted according to the Italian edition of The Chance and Necessity, Milan 2001, p. 117 ff.).
In the issues discussed so far it is a serious dialogue, for which I - as I have said repeatedly - I am grateful. The situation is different in the chapter on the priest and Catholic morality, and by still another in the chapters on Jesus As for what you say moral abuse of minors by priests, I can - as you know - just take note with deep concern . I have never tried to hide these things. That the power of evil penetrate to such an extent in the inner world of faith is for us a suffering which, on the one hand, we have to endure, while, on the other, we must at the same time, do everything possible to ensure that such cases do not repeated. Nor is it reassuring to know that, according to the research of sociologists, the percentage of priests are guilty of these crimes is not higher than that found in other similar professions. In any case, you should not submit this deviation ostentatiously as if it were a specific filth of Catholicism.
If you do not remain silent about evil in the Church, we must not, however, silenced even by the great shining path of goodness and purity, that the Christian faith has traced through the centuries. You have to remember the great figures and even that faith has produced - by Benedict of Nursia and his sister Scholastica, Francis and Clare of Assisi, Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross, the great saints of charity as Vincent de Paul and Camillo de Lellis to Mother Teresa of Calcutta and the great and noble figures of the nineteenth century Turin. It is also true today that faith leads many people to selfless love, in service to others, sincerity and justice. (...)
What you say about Jesus is not worthy of his rank science. If you question arises as to whether Jesus, after all, we did not know anything about Him, as a historical figure, nothing ascertainable, then I can only invite so decided to become a bit 'more competent from a historical point of view. I recommend this especially for the four volumes that Martin Hengel (exegete from the Protestant Theological Faculty of Tübingen) published together with Mary Schwemer: it is an excellent example of historical accuracy and very broad historical information. In the face of this, what you say about Jesus is talking reckless that should not be repeated. Exegesis that have been written too many things of lack of seriousness is, unfortunately, an indisputable fact. The American seminary of Jesus you cite the pages 105 ff. only confirms again what Albert Schweitzer had noticed about the Leben-Jesu-Forschung (Research on the life of Jesus) and that is that the so-called "historical Jesus" is mostly reflects ideas of the authors. These forms of botched historical work, however, have no influence on the importance of serious historical research, which has led us to true knowledge and confident about the announcement and the figure of Jesus
(...) I also have forcefully rejected his claim (p. 126) that I presented the historical-critical exegesis as a tool of the Antichrist. Treating the story of Jesus' temptations, I have only taken Soloviev's thesis, according to which the historical-critical exegesis can also be used by the antichrist - which is an indisputable fact. At the same time, however, always - and in particular in the preface to the first volume of my book on Jesus of Nazareth - I explained clearly that the historical-critical exegesis is necessary for a faith that does not propose myths with historical images, but calls for a genuine historicity and therefore must present the historical reality of his claims in a scientific manner. For this is not even correct that you tell me that I would be interested only in the meta: quite the contrary, all my efforts are aimed to show that the Jesus described in the Gospels is also the real historical Jesus, that it is story really happened. (...)
With the 19 chapter of your book back to the positive aspects of your dialogue with my thinking. (...) Even if your interpretation of John 1,1 is very far from what the evangelist meant, however, there is a convergence that is important. If you, however, wants to replace God with "Nature", the question remains, who or what is this nature. Nowhere She defines it thus appears as a deity and irrational which explains nothing. But I want to especially note further that in His religion of mathematics three basic themes of human existence are not considered: freedom, love and evil. I'm surprised that you just nod with a liquid that while freedom was and is the core value of modern times. Love, in his book, does not appear on the evil and also there is no information. Whatever the neurobiology say or do not say about freedom in the real drama of our history as it is actually crucial and must be taken into account. But His religion mathematics knows any information over evil. A religion that ignores these fundamental questions is empty.
Ill. mo Mr. Professor, my criticism of your book in part is tough. But the dialogue is part frankness, and only then can grow knowledge. She was very frank and so I accept that it is. In any case, however, I rate very positively the fact that you, through His deal with my Introduction to Christianity, he sought a dialogue so open with the faith of the Catholic Church and that, despite all the odds, the central part, not missing altogether convergences.
With cordial greetings and every good wish for your work.
My opinion about your book as a whole, however, is in itself rather mixed. I read some parts with enjoyment and profit. In other parts, however, I marveled at a certain aggressiveness and dell'avventatezza argument. (...)
Several times, she pointed out to me that theology would be science fiction. In this respect, I'm surprised that you, however, feel my book worthy of discussion as follows. Let me suggest on this issue four points:
1. It is fair to say that "science" in the strictest sense of the word it is just math, while I learned from you that even here yet distinction should be made between arithmetic and geometry. In all the scientific specific subjects each time has its own form, according to the particularity of its object. It is essential that you apply a verifiable method, excludes arbitrariness and ensure rationality in their different ways.
2. She should at least recognize that, in history and in that of philosophy, theology has produced lasting results.
3. An important function of theology is to keep religion tied to reason and reason to religion. Both functions are of paramount importance for humanity. In my dialogue with Habermas have shown that there are pathologies of religion and - no less dangerous - pathologies of reason. They both need each other, and keep them constantly connected is an important task of theology.
4. Science fiction exists, moreover, in the context of many sciences. What She exposes the theories about the beginning and the end of the world in Heisenberg, Schrödinger etc.., The designerei as science fiction in the best sense: they are visions and anticipations, to arrive at a true knowledge, but are, in fact, only imaginations with we try to get closer to reality. There is, moreover, science fiction in a big way just even within the theory of evolution. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is a classic example of science fiction. The great Jacques Monod wrote the sentences that he has inserted in his work certainly just as science fiction. I quote: "The emergence of tetrapod vertebrates ... draws its origin from the fact that a primitive fish" chose "to go and explore the land, on which, however, was unable to move except jumping clumsily and thus creating, as a result of a modification of behavior, the selective pressure due to which would have developed the sturdy limbs of tetrapods. Among the descendants of this bold explorer, Magellan of this evolution, some can run at a speed of over 70 miles per hour ... " (Quoted according to the Italian edition of The Chance and Necessity, Milan 2001, p. 117 ff.).
In the issues discussed so far it is a serious dialogue, for which I - as I have said repeatedly - I am grateful. The situation is different in the chapter on the priest and Catholic morality, and by still another in the chapters on Jesus As for what you say moral abuse of minors by priests, I can - as you know - just take note with deep concern . I have never tried to hide these things. That the power of evil penetrate to such an extent in the inner world of faith is for us a suffering which, on the one hand, we have to endure, while, on the other, we must at the same time, do everything possible to ensure that such cases do not repeated. Nor is it reassuring to know that, according to the research of sociologists, the percentage of priests are guilty of these crimes is not higher than that found in other similar professions. In any case, you should not submit this deviation ostentatiously as if it were a specific filth of Catholicism.
If you do not remain silent about evil in the Church, we must not, however, silenced even by the great shining path of goodness and purity, that the Christian faith has traced through the centuries. You have to remember the great figures and even that faith has produced - by Benedict of Nursia and his sister Scholastica, Francis and Clare of Assisi, Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross, the great saints of charity as Vincent de Paul and Camillo de Lellis to Mother Teresa of Calcutta and the great and noble figures of the nineteenth century Turin. It is also true today that faith leads many people to selfless love, in service to others, sincerity and justice. (...)
What you say about Jesus is not worthy of his rank science. If you question arises as to whether Jesus, after all, we did not know anything about Him, as a historical figure, nothing ascertainable, then I can only invite so decided to become a bit 'more competent from a historical point of view. I recommend this especially for the four volumes that Martin Hengel (exegete from the Protestant Theological Faculty of Tübingen) published together with Mary Schwemer: it is an excellent example of historical accuracy and very broad historical information. In the face of this, what you say about Jesus is talking reckless that should not be repeated. Exegesis that have been written too many things of lack of seriousness is, unfortunately, an indisputable fact. The American seminary of Jesus you cite the pages 105 ff. only confirms again what Albert Schweitzer had noticed about the Leben-Jesu-Forschung (Research on the life of Jesus) and that is that the so-called "historical Jesus" is mostly reflects ideas of the authors. These forms of botched historical work, however, have no influence on the importance of serious historical research, which has led us to true knowledge and confident about the announcement and the figure of Jesus
(...) I also have forcefully rejected his claim (p. 126) that I presented the historical-critical exegesis as a tool of the Antichrist. Treating the story of Jesus' temptations, I have only taken Soloviev's thesis, according to which the historical-critical exegesis can also be used by the antichrist - which is an indisputable fact. At the same time, however, always - and in particular in the preface to the first volume of my book on Jesus of Nazareth - I explained clearly that the historical-critical exegesis is necessary for a faith that does not propose myths with historical images, but calls for a genuine historicity and therefore must present the historical reality of his claims in a scientific manner. For this is not even correct that you tell me that I would be interested only in the meta: quite the contrary, all my efforts are aimed to show that the Jesus described in the Gospels is also the real historical Jesus, that it is story really happened. (...)
With the 19 chapter of your book back to the positive aspects of your dialogue with my thinking. (...) Even if your interpretation of John 1,1 is very far from what the evangelist meant, however, there is a convergence that is important. If you, however, wants to replace God with "Nature", the question remains, who or what is this nature. Nowhere She defines it thus appears as a deity and irrational which explains nothing. But I want to especially note further that in His religion of mathematics three basic themes of human existence are not considered: freedom, love and evil. I'm surprised that you just nod with a liquid that while freedom was and is the core value of modern times. Love, in his book, does not appear on the evil and also there is no information. Whatever the neurobiology say or do not say about freedom in the real drama of our history as it is actually crucial and must be taken into account. But His religion mathematics knows any information over evil. A religion that ignores these fundamental questions is empty.
Ill. mo Mr. Professor, my criticism of your book in part is tough. But the dialogue is part frankness, and only then can grow knowledge. She was very frank and so I accept that it is. In any case, however, I rate very positively the fact that you, through His deal with my Introduction to Christianity, he sought a dialogue so open with the faith of the Catholic Church and that, despite all the odds, the central part, not missing altogether convergences.
With cordial greetings and every good wish for your work.
- See more at: http://en.apocalisselaica.net/radar-laicita/cronache-laiche/ratzinger-scrive-a-odifreddi-mai-coperto-abusi#sthash.IWR1jU4g.dpuf
Source:
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1304027.htm
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100237766/hes-back-benedict-xvi-speaks-out-on-sex-abuse-and-calls-richard-dawkins-science-fiction/
Monday, September 23, 2013
Crazy Priest Booted

The media immediate had what they thought was confirmation that the Pope is indeed a liberal. However, that all changed when the news broke out that a crazy Australian priest named Greg Reynolds was excommunicated.
Reyolds believes all things contrary to Christ and His Catholic Church. He is an advocate for so-called 'same-sex' marriage and even gave Holy Communion to a dog. This priest is for all intent and purposes a 'liberal/progressive' who abused his position to put forward strange ideas.
Pope Francis excommunicated him sending a strong message that crazy dissident priests will not be tolerated.
Source:
http://protectthepope.com/?p=8379
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100237450/pope-francis-excommunicates-pro-gay-marriage-priest-hes-not-the-liberal-the-media-thinks/
http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/508066/20130923/greg-reynolds-pope-francis-vatican-excommunication-laicise.htm#.UkHICxBXmSo
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Exit Sandman
Rivera has been a New York Yankee for all of his career and is the best closer the game has ever had. A closer is a bullpen pitcher who teams use to end a game.
Rivera's career began in humble beginnings in Panama where he played using gloves made of milk cartons, baseballs made of a ball of tape and broom sticks as bats. His father was a fisherman who could not afford much. However, he saved enough to buy Mariano a glove which Mariano held with great esteem that he even slept with it under his pillow.
When scouted, not much was seen in the young Mariano. Scouts believed he was not minor league baseball material, however that would change. He was signed for $3,000 and began his career in the Yankee's minor league farm systems. While there, he would bond with three other players who he would eventually win world series championships with in 1996, 1998, 1998, 2000 and 2009. These players would be Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, and Andy Pettitte and would be forever named as the "4 core.'
In the mid 90's, Rivera would be called up and his career would flourish from there. His control and use of the famous "cutter" made him a formidable presence on the pitcher's mound. Batters did not want to face him because the outcome would be a strikeout. This era is now coming to an end in 2013. Mariano Rivera announced that 2013 would be his final year. He would retire. Andy Pettitte as well decided to retired making Jeter the only one left from the 'core 4.'
Prior to today's game against the San Francisco Giants, the Yankees held a ceremony for Mariano Rivera.
They unveiled a plaque in honor of Jackie Robinson's 42 as well as Mariano's 42 at Monument Park. Both will forever be memorialized along with the greats such as Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig and so on.
At the ceremony were his former teammates, Jorge Posada, Bernie Williams, Tino Martinez, Joe Torre, Dave Cone, Paul O' Neil and others. Rivera was given many gifts and the rock band Metallic even played live the song "Enter Sandman" which is used as Mariano's entrance song. The entire ceremony was well planned and was full of electricity and emotion.
Mariano spoke and thanked the Good Lord for his success. He thanked his family, the Steinbrenners, the Yankees, the fans and all those who he felt helped him reached the success that he has now. The president of Panama was also present.
Mariano Rivera is a true class act, always remaining humble and not bashful about his faith in Christ Jesus. On his glove, he has Philippians 4:13 stitched onto it which says that "I can do anything in Christ who strengthens me." One of the broadcasters on the Yes Network mistakenly said "Philistines" instead of Philippians. The verse was also placed on the plaques memorializing him.
Mariano Rivera will be truly missed, not only by Yankee fans, but all baseball fans. He never got into a fight, nor had any drama with other players or involved in drug criminal activities. He is a clean, modest player who is a great role model for the youth. He even has a foundation that helps poor children and communities by funding educational programs whether secular or religious.
I was a kid when he debut and grew up watching him play and win. Things will be so different without him. May God bless Mariano Rivera and his family. Thank you for the great memories at both the old and new Yankee Stadium. You will be missed!
Source:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/yankees/2013/09/22/yankees-honor-mariano-rivera-in-pregame-ceremony/2849629/
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1783074-twitter-reacts-to-mariano-riveras-farewell-ceremony-at-yankee-stadium
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/23787250/watch-yankees-honor-mariano-rivera-with-pregame-ceremony
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Triumph of Prayer for Peace
Prayer is something most of the world's population does on a regular basis. Atheists often criticize it by claiming that it does not work and that it is a delusion to speak to oneself. The recent course of events has proven them wrong. On September 7, 2013 the Holy Father Pope Francis called the world to Pray and Fast for Peace. Billions joined him worldwide as he led a prayer service at the Vatican that lasted over 5 hours! People of all walks of life, even religions joined in the pray for peace campaign.
Prior to this, rumors of war were circulating about. President Obama warned that he would authorize a strike with or without allies against Syria. He even went on television to make his case to the American people. Within just hours of making a final decision to attack based on the vote of Congress, something extraordinary happened. President Putin brokered a deal with Syria, Kerry and the United Nations in order to avert war. He even used a well known American newspaper to voice his plan. This made President Obama look bad eventually causing some to question why he received the Nobel Peace Prize when Putin could have received it instead.
Anyhow, there is no more talk of a strike; only talks of peace and the surrendering of chemical weapons. This is good news! Our prayers worked! Prayer triumphed over war and violence.
Let us keep praying for peace!
"Lord, you establish peace for us; all that we have accomplished you have done for us." - Isaiah 26:12
Paying Homeless for Iphone Spot on Line
Apparently some people are offering to pay homeless folks to wait on them on line for the new IPhone 5C/5S. This is despicable and shows how our society is falling more and more into materialism.
Homeless people are human and have dignity despite their financial state. They should not be humiliated into becoming a 'line holder' for people who are not content with a simple phone and need to have the 'latest' model. These people are puppets of companies who thrive on their stupidity.
When will our society learn the value of human life from conception to natural death? Is a phone worth more than a human person?
Source:
http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/09/20/homeless-paid-wait-line-new-iphone
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-using-homeless-to-buy-new-iphones-sparks-outrage-20130921,0,5069855.story
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/homeless-people-iphone-line_n_3963152.html