Introduction to the Comparison of the Extraordinary and Ordinary Forms of the Roman Rite
The Roman Rite of the Catholic Mass exists in two authorized forms: the Extraordinary Form (EF), codified in the 1962 Roman Missal, and the Ordinary Form (OF), promulgated in 1969 by Pope Paul VI following the Second Vatican Council. Though both express the same Eucharistic sacrifice, they differ in structure, language, liturgical emphasis, and ritual expression.
The tables below provide a clear, side-by-side comparison of key elements—including language, priestly orientation, readings, music, and the full Order of the Mass—with special attention to what was removed or added in the transition from the 1962 Missal to the 1970 Missal (and its subsequent editions). These changes reflect the Council’s goals of greater simplicity, active participation, and accessibility, while preserving the centrality of Christ’s sacrifice.
Whether you are a liturgist, catechist, parishioner, or curious inquirer, these charts offer an objective, concise reference to understand the historical development and liturgical identity of each form—both of which remain valid and cherished expressions of Catholic worship today.
Comparison of Extraordinary Form & Ordinary Form
| Aspect | Extraordinary Form | Ordinary Form |
|---|---|---|
| Also Known As | Tridentine Mass, TLatin Mass | Novus Ordo Missae, Mass of Paul VI |
| Promulgation | Codified 1570, revised 1962 | Promulgated 1969, revised 2002 |
| Language | Latin, minimal vernacular | Vernacular primarily, Latin permitted |
| Priest’s Orientation | Ad orientem | Versus populum or ad orientem |
| Liturgical Calendar | 1962 Calendar, fewer feasts | Revised, more feasts |
| Structure | Fixed: Prayers at Foot, single Canon | Flexible: multiple Eucharistic Prayers |
| Readings | 1-year cycle, Epistle & Gospel | 3-year cycle, OT added |
| Music | Gregorian chant, polyphony | Chant, hymns, contemporary |
| Communion | On tongue, kneeling | Hand or tongue, standing/kneeling |
| Participation | Priest-led, minimal responses | Active, more responses |
| Silence | Extensive, esp. Canon | Less, more audible |
EF vs OF: Order of Mass & Key Changes
| Aspect | Extraordinary Form | Ordinary Form | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Latin | Vernacular | Vernacular added |
| Orientation | Ad orientem | Versus populum | Facing people common |
| Order of Mass |
1. Prayers at Foot 2. Introit 3. Kyrie 4. Gloria 5. Collect 6. Epistle 7. Gradual 8. Gospel 9. Creed 10. Offertory 11. Secret 12. Canon (silent) 13. Communion 14. Postcommunion 15. Last Gospel 16. Dismissal |
1. Entrance 2. Greeting 3. Penitential Act 4. Kyrie 5. Gloria 6. Collect 7. OT Reading 8. Psalm 9. 2nd Reading 10. Gospel 11. Homily 12. Creed 13. Prayers of Faithful 14. Offertory 15. Eucharistic Prayer 16. Communion 17. Concluding Rite |
Removed: Prayers at Foot, Secret, Last Gospel Added: Penitential Act, OT & 2nd Reading, Prayers of Faithful |
| Readings | 1-year, 2 readings | 3-year, 3 readings | +OT & 2nd reading |
| Communion | Kneeling, tongue | Hand or tongue, standing | +hand, standing |
| Silence | Extensive | Reduced | – silence |
EF vs OF: Condensed Comparison Chart
| Aspect | Extraordinary Form | Ordinary Form | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Latin | Vernacular | Vernacular added |
| Orientation | Ad orientem | Versus populum | Facing people common |
| Order of Mass |
1. Prayers at Foot 2. Introit 3. Kyrie 4. Gloria 5. Epistle 6. Gospel 7. Offertory 8. Secret 9. Canon (silent) 10. Last Gospel |
1. Entrance 2. Penitential Act 3. OT Reading 4. Psalm 5. 2nd Reading 6. Gospel 7. Homily 8. Prayers of Faithful 9. Eucharistic Prayer 10. Concluding Rite |
Removed: Prayers at Foot, Last Gospel Added: OT, 2nd Reading, Intercessions |
| Readings | 1-year, 2 | 3-year, 3 | +OT & 2nd |
| Communion | Kneeling, tongue | Hand or tongue | +hand |
| Music | Chant, polyphony | Contemporary allowed | +modern |
| Silence | Extensive | Reduced | – silence |

No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.