The below is a tweet I saw from Dan Arel who presents himself as a writer and atheist activist. He apparently invited the former child actor Kirk Cameron to a debate. Cameron obviously did not reply and so Arel is making a spectacle of this. The whole thing is silly because we know Kirk Cameron will not entertain an insignificant unknown amateur writer. He will instead go after people like Dawkins and the like in order to garner more attention to his Creationist views.
Hey @KirkCameron it's rude to ignore peoples invitations to you. I have invited you to debate, why are you silent?
— Dan Arel (@danarel) November 14, 2014That being said, I invite Dan Arel to come debate me here instead based on the rules and format found here: http://rationallyfaithful.wordpress.com/rules/
Hopefully he will not run away in fear like "Rosa Rubicondior" did in 2012 see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/02/why-is-rubicondior-afraid-to-debate-me.html or like David Viviano "Gamma Atheist" did recently. see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/p/gamma-atheist-decays.html
Some atheists claim that I harass, abuse or stalk atheists, but it is they who come to me. This is not the first time I have encountered Mr. Dan Arel. Here are his previous tweets to me exhibiting a pathetic paranoia regarding my "twitter list;" a plea to restore "Rosa Rubicondior" and personal attacks which were unwarranted. See below how he attacks me. I never did anything to him.
ok @twitter this is enough user @sacerdotus is now providing lists of users and asking people to mark us as spam: http://t.co/EufdfjWM47
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 31, 2013@twitter “@Sacerdotus: Email me. I will tell you how to get the atheists suspended. @jprose” This is a problem.
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 26, 2013@Twitter why is @RosaRubicondior still suspended? She is victim of a crazy nut: http://t.co/fTFeRkkqaT and did nothing wrong. REACTIVATE!
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 26, 2013@twitter @support hi, you guys blocked @RosaRubicondior after smear campaign against her: http://t.co/DPpY6FSXLy thats unfair, un-suspend!
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 25, 2013@SYKOScoRch @CrispySea @twitter @GodlessAccount @Pipkinla @TriAtheist @Geologygeek @DominicVFX last paragraph: http://t.co/DPpY6FSXLy
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 25, 2013@marco_iO9 check this: http://t.co/rPEedcoeEx He blogged about it.
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 24, 2013So @Sacerdotus is just another child rape apologist and now is acting like a child throwing a hissy fit: http://t.co/DPpY6FSXLy #GrowUp
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 23, 2013.@Sacerdotus you are nothing but a pedophile apologist and no atheist has ever run from you. You block those who scare you.
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 23, 2013.@jaanbam @Sacerdotus @Liberty_2112 everyone is a former atheist. You are not born believing in such foolish ideas, they must be taught.
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 20, 2013'@Sacerdotus: #atheists eventually commit suicide, studies show. #catholic #trcot #Atheism why not link to said study?
— Dan Arel (@danarel) July 10, 2013So "Atheist Activist" do you accept my challenge? Contact me.
DO NOT Tweet to me as I do not look at Twitter and only use it to Tweet status updates and links from 3rd party sources.
UPDATE: November 15, 2014 - Dan Arel has just contacted me via my blog gmail account. We are now working on how to plan this debate so I ask all atheists, et. al. to please step aside and not interfere.
I have sent the following email to @scdtvs so he can no longer hide behind not being contacted. @catholicgadfly pic.twitter.com/GMqF4ZwmZf
— Dan Arel (@danarel) November 16, 2014UPDATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2014 - Dan and I have been in communication via email and we are working on a day to start the debate which will be more like a discussion than a formal one. To date, neither of us has backed out. Stay turned until the final details are worked out.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.