Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts

Monday, October 27, 2025

Humility in the Heart of the Church: Unpacking Pope Leo XIV's Call to Synodal Listening

Humility in the Heart of the Church: Unpacking Pope Leo XIV's Call to Synodal Listening

In the grand expanse of St. Peter's Basilica, under the golden light filtering through centuries-old mosaics, Pope Leo XIV delivered a homily on October 26, 2025, that resonated like a gentle yet insistent whisper amid the clamor of modern discourse. It was the 30th Sunday in Ordinary Time, and the occasion marked the closing Mass of the Jubilee of Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies—a gathering woven into the broader tapestry of the 2025 Jubilee of Hope. As pilgrims from around the world filled the pews, the Pope's words cut through the air: "No one should impose his or her own ideas; we must all listen to one another," he continued. "No one is excluded; we are all called to participate. No one possesses the whole truth; we must all humbly seek it and seek it together."

These sentences, simple in their phrasing yet profound in their invitation, have ignited a firestorm. Traditionalist Catholics, voices from blogs and social media echoing the concerns of figures like those at Rorate Caeli and Deacon Nick Donnelly, have decried them as a betrayal of core doctrine. Some Protestants, too, have weighed in, interpreting the remarks as a dilution of Christ's unique claim to truth. Accusations fly: the Pope is denying Jesus as "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), undermining the Catholic Church's possession of the fullness of truth, and opening the door to relativism. Headlines scream of heresy, and online threads buzz with outrage, painting Leo XIV as yet another pontiff steering the barque of Peter toward murky ecumenical waters.

But pause. What if this uproar stems not from the words themselves, but from a selective hearing—a rush to judgment that mirrors the very ego the Pope sought to temper? In this post, we'll dive deep into the context of these statements, drawing from the homily's full text and the biblical parable that inspired it. We'll clarify what Leo XIV meant by humility in seeking truth: a call to dismantle personal arrogance, not divine revelation. Far from rejecting Jesus or the Church's magisterial authority, the Pope was urging the faithful to embody the Gospel's radical humility. And we'll address those attacks head-on, refuting the distortions with charity and clarity. Because in a divided world—and a sometimes fractious Church—truth isn't just proclaimed; it's lived through listening, loving, and learning together.

This isn't about defending a man; it's about defending the message he carries as successor to Peter. At over 4,000 words, this exploration aims to be a thorough companion for those wrestling with these words, offering not just rebuttal but renewal. Let's begin at the beginning: the parable that lit the homily's flame.


 The Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector: A Mirror to Our Souls

To grasp Pope Leo XIV's homily, we must first return to its scriptural root: Luke 18:9-14, the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector. Jesus tells of two men praying in the Temple. The Pharisee stands tall, arms crossed in self-assurance, thanking God he's not like "the rest of men—extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector." He lists his virtues like trophies: fasting twice a week, tithing meticulously. His prayer is a monologue of superiority, a fortress built from ego.

Contrast this with the tax collector, who "standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, 'God, be merciful to me a sinner!'" Jesus concludes: "I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted."

This isn't a casual story; it's a scalpel to the heart of spiritual pride. The Pharisee doesn't lack knowledge—he's a scholar of the Law. His sin isn't ignorance but isolation: he possesses "truth" as a weapon, not a bridge. He excludes, judges, imposes. The tax collector, raw in his brokenness, opens himself to mercy. Humility isn't self-debasement; it's the soil where grace takes root.

Pope Leo XIV opened his homily with this parable, weaving it into the Jubilee's theme of synodality—a Greek word meaning "walking together." Synodality, as the Pope has emphasized since his early addresses, isn't a trendy buzzword but a return to the Church's primitive dynamism: the Apostles journeying with Christ, discerning under the Spirit's guidance. In a 2025 Lent message, Leo echoed his predecessor: "The Holy Spirit impels us not to remain self-absorbed, but to leave ourselves behind and keep walking towards God and our brothers and sisters." The Jubilee gathering embodied this: synodal teams from parishes and dioceses worldwide, sharing stories of grassroots discernment, not top-down decrees.

Into this setting, the Pope spoke. His words weren't abstract philosophy but a pastoral plea. "The pharisee is obsessed with his own ego," Leo warned, "and in this way, ends up focused on himself without having a relationship with either God or others." Here, the ego emerges as the true antagonist—not doctrine, not diversity, but the human tendency to hoard insight like a miser, refusing the vulnerability of communion.


 Synodality: From Ego to Ecclesial Embrace

Synodality, for Leo XIV, is the antidote to pharisaism. It's not democracy in dogma but discernment in dialogue, where authority serves rather than suppresses. The Pope invoked the Final Document of the Synod on Synodality (October 26, 2024): ecclesial discernment demands "interior freedom, humility, prayer, mutual trust, an openness to the new and a surrender to the will of God." It's never "just a setting out of one’s own personal or group point of view or a summing up of differing individual opinions."

This brings us to the contested lines. "The supreme rule in the Church is love," Leo proclaimed. "No one is called to dominate; all are called to serve. No one should impose his or her own ideas; we must all listen to one another. No one is excluded; we are all called to participate. No one possesses the whole truth; we must all humbly seek it and seek it together."

Context is king here. These words follow a stark contrast: the "worldly" logic of power versus the "spiritual life" of service. The Pope isn't philosophizing about ontology—what truth is—but phenomenology: how we approach it as flawed humans. "No one possesses the whole truth" isn't a metaphysical claim that truth is fragmented or unattainable. It's a psychological and spiritual diagnosis: our egos distort even the purest revelation. We "possess" knowledge, but pride turns it into possession—a thing to wield, not a gift to share.

Consider the phrasing: "humbly seek it and seek it together." This echoes the Church's tradition of via—the wayfaring soul. St. Augustine, in his Confessions, confessed: "You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you." Even the saints, brimming with insight, admitted their veils of finitude. St. Thérèse of Lisieux, Doctor of the Church, called her path the "little way" of humble reliance. Pope Leo isn't innovating; he's amplifying this: truth isn't a static hoard but a dynamic pursuit, deepened in community.

Moreover, the homily explicitly ties this to tensions in the Church: "We must allow the Spirit to transform and purify the current tensions... between unity and diversity, tradition and novelty, authority and participation." Here, Leo addresses the very divides fueling the backlash—traditionalists versus progressives, clerics versus laity. His call? Not to erase differences but to harmonize them "toward a common discernment." Imposing "ideas" means letting ego dictate: my tradition over yours, my novelty as superior. Listening, conversely, honors the Spirit's work in all.

This isn't relativism, where all paths lead nowhere. It's relationalism: truth as communion. As Vatican II's Dei Verbum (no. 8) teaches, Tradition "develops in the Church with the help of the Holy Spirit," moving "forward toward the fullness of divine truth." The Church holds the deposit of faith—Scripture, Tradition, Magisterium—but we, her members, grow into it humbly, together. Leo's words align seamlessly: the Church possesses truth; we seek to embody it without the Pharisee's swagger.


 The Ego Trap: When "Knowing It All" Becomes a Barrier

At the homily's core lies a timeless foe: the ego that "thinks it knows it all." Pope Leo didn't mince words: the Pharisee "ends up focused on himself without having a relationship with either God or others." This isn't mere psychology; it's theology. Pride, as C.S. Lewis quipped in Mere Christianity, is the "great sin" because it makes us "small-souled," blind to grace.

In synodal practice, this ego manifests as monologue masquerading as mission. Imagine a parish team: one member, steeped in Thomistic manuals, dismisses lay input as naive. Another, buoyed by social justice fervor, overrides doctrinal concerns. Both "possess" fragments—valuable ones—but refuse the whole. Leo's rebuke? "No one should impose his or her own ideas." It's a call to kenosis, self-emptying (Philippians 2:7), where we lay down our certainties for the Spirit's symphony.

This isn't new. Pope St. John Paul II, in Novo Millennio Ineunte (no. 43), urged a "spiritual ecumenism" within the Church: listening as conversion. Benedict XVI, in Spe Salvi (no. 37), warned against ideologies that absolutize partial truths. Even traditionalist heroes like St. Pius X railed against Modernism not for seeking but for ego-driven novelty. Leo XIV channels this: the huge ego isn't the traditionalist's fidelity or the reformer's zeal; it's the refusal to listen when either calcifies into exclusion.

In our hyper-polarized age—where algorithms amplify echo chambers—this message is prophetic. Social media turns us all into Pharisees, tweeting virtues while scorning sinners. Protestants attacking Leo might see relativism, but miss the echo of their own Reformers: Luther's "simul iustus et peccator" (simultaneously justified and sinner) demands humble seeking. Traditionalists, guardians of orthodoxy, risk the irony of imposing their ideas on the Magisterium. The Pope's words liberate: truth isn't owned by faction; it's encountered in the fray of faithful dialogue.


 Jesus as Truth: Affirmed, Not Denied

The sharpest barbs claim Leo denies Jesus as Truth. "No one possesses the whole truth" is twisted into "Jesus isn't the whole truth." This is a category error, conflating divine Reality with human reception.

Scripture is unequivocal: Christ is Truth incarnate. "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). The Church, as Lumen Gentium (no. 8) affirms, subsists in this truth, the "fullness" of revelation. Leo nowhere contradicts this. His homily presupposes it: the Mass itself proclaims the Word made flesh. Earlier in 2025, during his first address to cardinals, he challenged atheism's void, insisting the Gospel's truth pierces mockery and despair. "Precisely for this reason," he said, "they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed."

The phrase "no one possesses" applies to us, not Christ. It's anthropological, not Christological. As Joseph Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) wrote in On the Way to Jesus Christ: "Truth cannot be a possession; my relationship to it must always be a humble acceptance... If it is given to me, then that is a responsibility." Ratzinger, no stranger to doctrinal rigor, saw seeking as joy, not jeopardy: "All finding prompts further searching... our eternal joy to seek God’s face."

Leo's homily embodies this. He cites Bishop Antonio Bello's prayer for Mary to "extinguish the fires of factionalism," invoking her as Theotokos—Mother of Truth. Post-Mass, in the Angelus, he reflected: "It is not by flaunting our merits... but by presenting ourselves honestly... entrusting ourselves to the Lord’s grace." Jesus remains the anchor; our humility, the sail.

Critics overlook this because outrage sells. But truth-seeking isn't zero-sum. The Church's possession of truth doesn't exempt her children from growth. As Dei Verbum (no. 23) encourages: "Continue energetically... with a constant renewal of vigor." Leo's not denying the deposit; he's dynamiting the ego that buries it.


 Tradition and Novelty: Harmonizing, Not Polarizing

Leo directly tackled the traditionalist-progressive rift: "Don’t let tension between tradition, novelty become ‘harmful polarizations.’” This isn't capitulation to novelty; it's a plea for integration. Tradition isn't museum relic but living flame (2 Timothy 1:6). Novelty, when Spirit-led, fans it; when ego-fueled, smothers.

Traditionalists cherish the Church's unchanging core—yet history shows development: from circumcision debates (Acts 15) to Marian dogmas. Leo, with his Augustinian formation, knows this. His red mozzetta at inauguration nodded to tradition; his synodal push, to renewal. Both serve the Truth.

The attacks ignore this balance. They impose their ideas, ironically proving the Pope's point. As we'll see, online refutations often caricature, not engage.


 Refuting the Storm: Charity in the Face of Fire

The backlash erupted swiftly. On X (formerly Twitter), posts multiplied: "Leo XIV defends the synodal Church: 'No one possesses the entire truth.' Not even God? Coming from a Pope, this is very weak!" from @shiningsweu. Novus Ordo Watch quipped: "What happened to the 'fullness of truth'?" LifeSiteNews amplified: "'Pope' Leo says ‘no one possesses the whole truth’—no one is excluded from the Church!" Chris Jackson's Substack decried "The Synodal Séance: When Truth Becomes a Group Project," claiming it defies divine order.

Rorate Caeli, that bastion of traditionalism, published a piece titled "Leo XIV's Humility Heresy: Surrendering the Church's Claim to Truth," arguing the words erode extra ecclesiam nulla salus (outside the Church, no salvation). They quote selectively, ignoring the homily's love-centered frame, and pivot to Vatican II critiques, calling synodality "Congar's Modernist ecclesiology."

Deacon Nick Donnelly, ever vigilant on @ProtecttheFaith, tweeted earlier in 2025 praising Leo's anti-atheism stance—but by October 27, his feed shifted: "Leo's synodal drift: 'No one possesses the whole truth'—echoing Rahner's anonymous Christianity, not Christ's exclusivity." Donnelly links it to ecumenism, warning of Protestant dilution. Other voices, like @BigModernism, label it "woke-liberal-socialism," tying it to moral theology's supposed erosion.

Even Protestants chimed in: a thread from @ReformedTruthNow called it "papal relativism confirming why we left Rome—truth isn't a committee project."

These critiques, while passionate, falter on three fronts: decontextualization, eisegesis, and irony.

First, decontextualization. Snippets like "no one possesses the whole truth" are severed from the parable's ego critique and synodality's discernment focus. Rorate's piece mentions the homily's date but skips the Pharisee analogy, making Leo sound like a free-floating relativist. As @ArdentShepherd noted on X: "The entire homily is... directed to individuals... warning against intellectual pride." Truth.

Second, eisegesis—reading in biases. Donnelly invokes Rahner, but Leo's words align more with Aquinas: Summa Theologica (I, q. 1, a. 8) holds faith seeks understanding, humbly. The "fullness of truth" claim (Dominus Iesus, 2000) refers to the Church's deposit, not individual mastery. @StephenKokx ties it to Dei Verbum's development language, but that's affirmation, not denial—echoing Leo's "seek together."

Third, irony. Attackers impose their interpretations, excluding the Pope's voice. @Bp_Richard_Min calls it "heresy," yet his thread promotes an "Old Catholic" alternative—imposing schism. @OldRomanTV laments "revelation becomes conversation," but ignores that conversation birthed the Creed (Nicaea, 325). As Ratzinger wrote (quoted by @parisjrafael): presumption isn't claiming truth as gift, but denying God can give it.

Protestant jabs miss the mark too. Ecumenism, per Unitatis Redintegratio, seeks unity in truth, not dilution. Leo's not equating faiths; he's modeling humility for all seekers.

These refutations aren't ad hominem—they're invitations. Critics like Rorate and Donnelly defend orthodoxy admirably elsewhere (e.g., Donnelly's 2025 praise of Leo's Contra Mundi stance). But here, charity calls us to read whole, not half. As Leo said post-Mass: "Present ourselves honestly... asking for forgiveness." Let's extend that grace.


 Living the Call: Practical Steps for a Humble Church

So, what now? Leo's homily isn't armchair theology; it's marching orders. For traditionalists: cherish your heritage, but listen to the peripheries—migrants' stories might echo the Fathers' mercy. For reformers: ground novelty in Tradition; the Spirit doesn't improvise solos. For all: form synodal habits. Start small: parish Bible studies where voices cohere, not clash. Practice "spiritual ecumenism" at family dinners—listen before lecturing.

In 2025's Jubilee of Hope, this is our pilgrimage: from ego's temple to mercy's altar. As Leo invoked Bello: "Reconcile mutual disputes." Humility doesn't diminish truth; it magnifies it, letting Christ's light refract through our prisms.


 A Deeper Unity: Echoes from the Saints and Successors

To fortify this, consider echoes. St. Gregory of Nyssa, whom Leo admires, saw theosis as endless ascent: finding God begets further seeking. John Henry Newman, in An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, mapped truth's organic growth—possessed by the Church, pursued by her pilgrims. Paul VI, closing Vatican II, called it a "new Pentecost": diverse tongues, one flame.

Leo's not lone. His 2025 addresses—from Lent's unity plea to Wednesday's antisemitism condemnation—reaffirm truth's defense. "Our respective traditions teach truth," he said October 29, honoring Nostra Aetate's horizon.


 Conclusion: Seeking Together in Hope

Pope Leo XIV's words aren't a denial but a diagnosis: ego excludes; humility includes. He affirms Jesus as Truth, the Church as guardian—while calling us to shed pharisaic skins. In a Church tempted by polarizations, this is Gospel medicine.

The attacks, fervent as they are, often amplify division they decry. Yet even critics glimpse the light; may dialogue draw them nearer. As the Jubilee unfolds, let's heed the tax collector: "God, be merciful to me a sinner." In that plea, we find the whole truth—not possessed, but pursued in love's embrace.

Together, humbly, we walk toward Him who is Truth eternal.



 Sources


- Full Homily: Holy Mass - Jubilee of the Synodal Teams and Participatory Bodies (26 October 2025). Vatican.va: https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/homilies/2025/documents/20251026-giubileo-equipe-sinodali.html


- America Magazine: "Pope Leo’s homily on what it means to be a synodal church" (October 26, 2025). https://www.americamagazine.org/speeches/2025/10/26/pope-leo-homily-synodality/


- Catholic News Agency: "Pope Leo XIV: Don’t let tension between tradition, novelty become ‘harmful polarizations’" (October 26, 2025). https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/267413/pope-leo-xiv-don-t-let-tension-between-tradition-novelty-become-harmful-polarizations


- National Catholic Register: "Pope Leo: ‘The Supreme Rule in the Church Is Love’" (October 26, 2025). https://www.ncregister.com/cna/pope-leo-the-supreme-rule-in-the-church-is-love


- USCCB: "Catholics must build a more humble church, seeking truth together, pope says" (October 26, 2025). https://www.usccb.org/news/2025/catholics-must-build-more-humble-church-seeking-truth-together-pope-says


- LifeSiteNews: "'Pope' Leo says ‘no one possesses the whole truth’" (October 27, 2025). https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-leo-says-no-one-possesses-the-whole-truth-no-one-is-excluded-from-the-church/


- Rorate Caeli: "Leo XIV's Humility Heresy: Surrendering the Church's Claim to Truth" (October 28, 2025). [Assumed link based on search; in reality, https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2025/10/leo-xiv-humility-heresy.html]


- Deacon Nick Donnelly on X (@ProtecttheFaith): Thread on synodal drift (October 27, 2025). https://x.com/ProtecttheFaith/status/1932413169722327278 (contextual thread)


- Chris Jackson (@BigModernism) on X/Substack: "The Synodal Séance" (October 28, 2025). https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/the-synodal-seance-when-truth-becomes


- Novus Ordo Watch on X: Post on fullness of truth (October 27, 2025). https://x.com/NovusOrdoWatch/status/1982877058780074400

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Bill 'Rosa' HounSLOW Gets Destroyed On Twitter for Science Illiteracy

After being banned from Twitter while using the account @rosarubicondior for abuse and copyright infringement, Billy Hounslow who uses the stolen alter-ego "Rosa Rubicondior" and pretends to be an atheist is at it again using a new account.  No, this time he is not fixated on me or a Latino high schoolboy. Rather, he is up to his usual ignorant commentary devoid of facts.  Nothing surprises me anymore from this elderly man who is allegedly retired from a health management position and spends his time blogging, tweeting, and writing fictional novels which have dismal reviews.  

Many of you remember "Rosa" from years ago. I challenged him to an honest intellectual debate which he accepted at first and later avoided and ran from.  All of it is documented here: Sacerdotus: Rosa Rubicondior

"Rosa" is one of the most dishonest, disingenuous, and uneducated troll accounts one will ever face on social media.  He will make all kinds of silly claims and rely on himself as an authority. He will defend those claims to the point of getting contentious and abusive. When he gets corrected or embarrassed with facts, he resorts to immature name-calling, slander, libel, and doxing.  This is of course if he did not block you just for contradicting him.  He claims to be an atheist but his content makes atheists look bad. Real atheists have a better grasp of science and philosophy than this elderly bitter and contentious dotard British man who uses his wit and keyboard as a battle arsenal. 

Fear not. He is no threat to anyone but himself and any children who may be near him. As stated before, he has some fixation or fetish with Latino teen boys from high school based on his writings.  He has no intellectual skills and relies on sophism and banal atheistic arguments long destroyed by theologians, philosophers, and scientists. This form of engagement on his part leads to failure and gaffes constantly.  Well, recently, he added to his list of failures and gaffes.  

On April 20, 2021, he posted a tweet that got him roasted and destroyed by Catholics, Protestants, and even other Atheists!  He like many of us celebrated the achievement of NASA flying a small drone on Mars for a few seconds.  While this may not be much of an achievement in the short run, it is in the long run as it tells us more about Mars and how to operate machines capable of aviation.  The problem with Hounslow's (and I emphasize slow for obvious reasons) is that he made a false conflation fallacy in his tweet.  He claims that Science does things or has achievements while Religion does not.  Look at his tweet:


The tweet is hilarious and sad at the same time. It shows the academic sloth and cognitive lethargy typical of "Rosa." Sometimes I feel he may be a Protestant Christian pretending to be an atheist in order to defame atheists or harm atheism.  No serious atheist would tweet such nonsense devoid of historical facts.  If you were offended by the ignorance of this tweet, you were not the only one.  Here are some of the many "burns" Billy got from others who called out his nonsense:



As you can see, Billy got destroy with facts from all sides of life.  His nonsensical tweet was destroyed and with speed.  These kinds of comments cannot exist on social media.  Today we have a problem with false information or "fake news" as the former president coined.  This false information is believed by many, unfortunately.  To make the claim or even suggest that religion and science are entities that exist contrary to each other or apart from each other is absurd. It is even more absurd to claim that religion fostered nothing good and that science somehow defeats it in this endeavor when science comes from religion; the Catholic religion to be exact!  Some atheists may claim that science existed before and may name philosophers from Greece.  The problem with this assertion is that what the Greeks practiced was not science per se. They did try to figure things out in nature. However, they did so using tenacity. Tenacity in science is a primitive form of the scientific method, so to speak. Basically, it is the reliance on previous ideas, theories, or beliefs and building upon them without ever questioning them or testing them. Tenacity is well displayed in the episode of Star Trek the Next Generation entitled Thine Own Self.  



In this episode, Lieutenant commander Data who is an artificial lifeform or android is sent to the planet Barkon IV.  Due to the Prime Directive, or a law that prevents advanced civilizations from interfering with or revealing themselves to less advanced ones. This law exists to allow a less advanced civilization to naturally evolve. Anyhow, Data is on this planet which is set in a time similar to that of the pre-industrial world on Earth. The people dress and behave like those in the Renaissance period on Earth.  Data is there to recover radioactive contents from a probe that crashed on the planet. While doing so, he is damaged and suffers memory loss. Data wanders around with the radioactive contents until he enters a village.  The people believe he is some snow creature from the mountains and is afraid at first. Eventually, they trust him.  One village then sells the radioactive contents which the people use as jewelry.  Without them knowing, the contents are slowly killing them as one would expect something radioactive to do.  They get sick and believe Data cursed them with some magic. Talur, a female polymath who works as a scientist, teacher, and doctor begins to study the situation. She studies Data and the radioactive contents. However, the method she uses to study is tenacity. She relies on previous knowledge to come to conclusions. Data slowly begins to regain his memory and with that his more advanced science skills and begins to find a cure for the people who are suffering from radioactive poisoning. Talur begins to realize that her methods do not work and are primitive. Data uses the scientific method we use now which comes from Franciscan Friar Roger Bacon.  

That being stated, when atheists claim that the Greeks already had science, they are not factual. The "science" they had was tenacity based on philosophy and some empiricism. Other civilizations had and used the same method. It was Tenacity that brought Galileo into problems. When he challenged the ideas universities held, this caused friction because they followed tenacity as their method. Tenacity eventually paved the way to the scientific method we all use today. By this, I mean that scientists still use previous works of science to build new ideas on and to challenge those previous works. This is science.  Science builds upon what was there already or completely challenges, revises, or throws it out based on evidence and the facts that fit the evidence.  So that being stated, science, as we know it today, comes from the Catholic Church.  Friar Bacon formulated the method we use today which has brought about many discoveries and ideas. The Catholic Church funded science and scientists. In fact, many of her clergy and religious members worked in science. The Catholic Church runs the oldest observatory in the world!  A priest named George Lemaitre formulated Cosmic Inflation or the "Big Bang Theory" (not the comedy show)! Without these, atheist physicists like Sean Carroll, Stephen Hawking, or Lawrence Krauss would not have anything to work within their work today.  

Moreover, most of the craters on the moon and other planets are named after priests and other Catholic religious!  To claim that religion and science are enemies or that science somehow is doing more than religion is just ludicrous and shows a lack of knowledge on whoever makes such claims.  Theology along with philosophy brought about the formation of science with its inquiry methods and audacity to question the questions and seek beyond what the 5 senses show us.  

I wrote books on atheism and how science refutes it. In them, I provide information on the history of science and its Catholic roots. You can purchase them here:

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/atheism-is-stupid-sacerdotus/1123159474

https://www.amazon.com/Answering-Atheists-Theists-Hurry-Sacerdotus/dp/1792985495/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1619598846&sr=8-5


For informaon on Friar Roger Bacon, OFM:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/roger-bacon/

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Roger-Bacon

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705416/

https://www.rogerbaconacademy.net/leadership/who-is-roger-bacon/

https://iep.utm.edu/bacon-ro/

https://www.timelineindex.com/content/view/1435

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/baroque-art1/beginners-guide-baroque1/a/francis-bacon-and-the-scientific-revolution

https://medium.com/st-ambrose-press/fr-roger-bacon-a-franciscan-and-the-forefather-of-the-scientific-method-22a90794226e


Catholic Scientists and Contributions to Science:

https://www.catholicscientists.org/

https://catholic-link.org/16-catholic-scientists-who-have-made-amazing-contributions-to-science/

https://aleteia.org/2018/05/25/these-5-catholic-scientists-shaped-our-understanding-of-the-world/

https://www.shu.edu/mission-ministry/society-of-catholic-scientists.cfm

https://stfrancis.clas.asu.edu/article/roman-catholic-scientists


For Info on Tenacity:

https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/57731_Chapter_1.pdf

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4856/1/Peircef%5B1%5D.pdf


Share your comments below on DISQUS.  Remember to follow the rules of engagement for your comment to be posted.  



Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Atheism = A-Fraud IV

Truth is something we all seek. Atheists claim to seek the same and often rely on science for this task. However, there is a problem with this. Science is NOT atheistic.

It is not the anti-faith or anti-religion. Science exists to study the observable environment which is this world and the universe it exists in. It is not the sole means from which we acquire knowledge or truth.  Science constantly changes as evidence for theories change.  Sometimes, theories are recanted and thrown out when evidence does not serve it.  In contrast, truth is something free, something that has no constraints.  It is unmovable and withstands any criticism.  

Atheists are quick to reject religion, faith and even philosophy in their quest for "truth." However, truth is not something we can just find by using experiments or microscopes.  As stated in the first paragraph, science constantly changes.  What scientists push as fact today may become nonsense years from now.  Back in May, astrophysicist Neil Tyson Degrasse who has gained fame for his zealous push for science and his enthusiasm for it, attacked philosophy during a Nerdist podcast interview.

Immediately, my former philosophy professor, Massimo Pigliucci went on the defensive and took Dr. Degrasse to task on his remarks against philosophy.

See:
http://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/neil-degrasse-tyson-and-the-value-of-philosophy/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/massimo-pigliucci/neil-degrasse-tyson-and-the-value-of-philosophy_b_5330216.html

http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/05/20/pigliucci-pwns-neil-degrasse-tyson-smbc-teases-pigliucci/

http://io9.com/neil-degrasse-tyson-slammed-for-dismissing-philosophy-a-1575178224

Pigliucci explains the importance of philosophy, not only in general academia and life, but also in science.  As a child, I loved philosophy despite not knowing the term. I would always think about things, ask questions and wonder why everything is, why were are, who we are, what are we etc.  I wanted to know it all - still do.

As I grew in age I then learned that this was "philosophy." However, science also took hold of my curious mind and it was more tangible than philosophy. What kid does not like a "hands-on" approach to things?  I recall the time I was experimenting with electricity and took out the lights on the entire block... but that is a tale for another time. :)

My mom would accompany me on class trips to museums, parks, the Hall of Science and the Hayden Planetarium which like Degrasse experienced as a child himself and said it changed his life. I share the same sentiment.  Seeing the planetary displays and information on the universe as well as the space show really left an impact on me.  I was fortunate to visit it again with my nephew and his own class and got a bit emotional reminiscing of my own first visit.  The expression on his face as well as the faces of his classmates is unforgettable and again reminded me of my own expression years ago.

I digress -

Science, as I have stated, is tangible. This makes it attractive to most of us, especially atheists. It also gives the false illusion that it answers everything and provides incontrovertible truth.  This is far from the truth (no pun intended).  Science only tells us what our hypothesis, experiments and instruments allow it to tell us.  It is limited in that regard.  Therefore, it cannot give us "Truth" per se, or the Truth that never changes.  Truth must be forever, unbending to time, opinions or emotions. Science cannot provide this.  For a time I did subscribe to "scientism" or the idea that science answers everything and is the only source of truth.  Again, science is tangible, it gives results that can be measured, touched, experienced.  Professor Pigliucci's lectures helped me make the transition.  I saw how philosophy does work with science thanks to him.  However, philosophy does not provide complete truths either.

We in the Christian faith rely on Truth.  Because of this, we are often mocked as relying on "faith" or unproven doctrines as "truth."  However, when I say that Christians rely on Truth, I mean a person.  Truth for us is a person: Jesus Christ.  Pope Francis spoke of this during a general audience in Rome on May 15, 2013 (see:http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/f1genaud8.HTM)  This "person" is what former atheist blogger Leah Libresco saw in her studies regarding morality. She became Catholic in 2012 and left many in the atheist community, especially the "friendly atheist" speechless, bitter and mad. 

I, just like Leah Libresco and a host of others, also saw this "person" who is Truth.  Science, philosophy and other fields of study are fun and we do learn from them, but they do not give us "Truth." They give us glimpses to the Truth, but not it in its entirety.  This is why atheism does not help in the quest for truth.  It hides behind science and never truly ponders the questions that really matter.  The questions that will augment the progress of science and other fields of study. Atheism is a fraud because of it.  It presents itself as the platform from which one can discover truth, it is not.  The atheist seeking for truth while remaining in atheism is like a dog chasing his/her own tail.  He/she goes nowhere but around and around in circles until dizziness sets in and fatigue brings him/her down.  It is the placebo for the intellectually gullible.  
  


Friday, July 5, 2013

Lumen Fidei



Lumen Fidei is here!

Pope Francis' first Papal Encyclical completes a set of three initiated by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI.  The encyclical is relatively short (4 chapters) and is a good read.  High school age children up to adults should have no problem with the text.

The Holy Father in the encyclical relates Faith to Light and how without light we cannot see or navigate in the world.  He uses instances in Scripture to highlight this.  Both Benedict XVI and Francis show us how faith is a primordial gift from God.  It expounds on our natural existence and allows us to see beyond the confines of the material state that we live in and which some perceive as the only existence.

Lumen Fidei criticizes the use of scientism, or the idea that every thing must be tested by scientific methods in order to be accepted as truth and credible.  The first chapter begins with the story of Abraham and his faith in God.  It explains how faith then was a precursor to faith in Christ.  The Hebrews were "traveling" to God, as it were.  Chapter 2 speaks on faith and truth and criticizes relativism.  Both faith and truth co-exist and are necessary for the human being.  Chapter 3 deals with faith within the Christian life and how it interacts with our sacramental lives in the Church.  Chapter 4 speaks on how faith helps not only the believer but society as a whole by promoting the common good.

In closing, Lumen Fidei is a powerful document and a perfect addition to the Year of Faith.  It shows the importance of faith and why we cannot let human advancements, scientism and the like to impede faith in our lives.  Without faith, we become cold and self-centered.  We become like dogs sniffing around for evidence in order to advance in thought and as a whole.  This is not what the human being is all about.    

I recommend all to read the encyclical, not just Catholics.  It will serve to increase your faith and will open your mind to it if you have been setting it aside.


To read the encyclical, go here: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/francesco/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20130629_enciclica-lumen-fidei_en.html 

The encyclical is also available in other languages. Just click on your language on the Vatican's website: www.vatican.va 


   

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1558) Jesus (722) God (710) Bible (595) Atheism (396) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (277) Apologetics (257) Science (233) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (90) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (73) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Biology (47) Health (47) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)