Sacerdotus - "Come now, let us reason together." Isaiah 1:18
Showing posts with label X. Show all posts
Showing posts with label X. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2025

Alex 'Voice of Reason' Jurado in Alleged Sexting Scandal With A Female Minor

Addressing Allegations Against Alex Jurado and the Challenges of Catholic Apologetics in the Digital Age

In the fast-paced world of social media, where voices rise and fall with a single post, Catholic apologist Alex Jurado, known as "Voice of Reason," has gained significant attention for his passionate defense of the Catholic faith. With a growing following on platforms like YouTube and TikTok, Jurado has become a prominent figure in Catholic apologetics, known for his debates and discussions on topics like the Eucharist and papal authority. However, recent posts on X have raised serious allegations against him, claiming involvement in a sexting scandal with a 14-year-old girl and inappropriate behavior toward women. As of now, these claims lack credible evidence, but they raise important questions about the intersection of faith, public personas, and the responsibility to uphold Catholic values in the digital age. Who is Alex Jurado? Alex Jurado, known as "Voice of Reason," is a self-taught Catholic apologist from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who began his journey in catechesis at age 16. Described as a "teenage prodigy" in his local community, Jurado taught both teenagers and adults in parochial faith formation before transitioning to a brief stint in seminary and a career in acting. In 2023, he launched his social media presence, quickly amassing a large following due to his charismatic delivery and distinctive voice, often compared to Sylvester Stallone. His work has reportedly led thousands to embrace or return to Catholicism, and he has engaged in high-profile debates, including one against Protestant theologian Dr. James White in 2024.[](https://catholicspeakers.com/profiles/alex-jurado-voice-of-reason)[](https://thecatholicherald.com/young-catholic-rocky-tiktoker-who-took-on-renowned-protestant-theologian-and-debate-champion-and-won/) Jurado’s rise has not been without controversy. His bold style and rapid ascent have drawn both admiration and criticism, with some praising his fervor and others questioning his approach. However, the recent allegations of a sexting scandal involving a minor and inappropriate behavior toward women have cast a shadow over his public persona, prompting a closer examination of the claims and their implications. The Allegations: What We Know On July 13, 2025, posts on X surfaced accusing Alex Jurado of sexually grooming a 14-year-old girl when he was 21 and engaging in inappropriate sexting with women. One post from @LepantoInst described the accusations as "extremely serious," while another from @109evictions made inflammatory claims, including a derogatory generalization about Mexicans, which undermines its credibility. These posts, however, provide no verifiable evidence, such as court documents, victim statements, or official reports, to substantiate the claims. According to claims posted online with "receipts," Jurado groomed a young girl when he was in a catechist position. More screenshots allegedly show him grooming his female fans recently. A thorough review of available web sources, including Catholic Answers, the Diocese of Brownsville, and media outlets, reveals no mention of a sexting scandal or inappropriate behavior linked to Jurado. Instead, these sources focus on his contributions as a Catholic apologist, his debates, and his influence on social media. The absence of credible reporting on these allegations suggests they may be unfounded or, at the very least, unverified.[](https://catholicspeakers.com/profiles/alex-jurado-voice-of-reason)[](https://www.catholic.com/profile/alex-jurado)[](https://cdob.org/voiceofreason) The Broader Context: Scandals and Catholicism The Catholic Church has faced significant scrutiny over the years due to sexual abuse scandals involving clergy and laypeople, which may amplify the impact of such allegations against figures like Jurado. High-profile cases, such as those documented by the Boston Globe in 2002, have shaped public perception, making accusations of sexual misconduct particularly damaging, even when unproven. The Church has since implemented stricter policies to address abuse, but the shadow of past scandals lingers, making any new allegation a lightning rod for controversy.[](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage_of_Catholic_sexual_abuse_cases) In the digital age, social media platforms like X can amplify unverified claims, spreading them rapidly before evidence is established. This phenomenon is not unique to Jurado; other public figures, such as former Congressman Anthony Weiner, have faced similar scrutiny over sexting scandals, though those cases involved documented evidence. In Jurado’s case, the lack of concrete proof underscores the need for caution in addressing such claims, as false accusations can irreparably harm reputations and undermine legitimate efforts to address misconduct.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandals) Catholic Teachings and Personal Conduct Catholicism places a high value on chastity, respect for human dignity, and the sanctity of relationships. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that sexual acts are reserved for marriage and must reflect mutual respect and love (CCC 2351-2356). Any behavior involving the exploitation of minors or inappropriate sexual conduct, such as sexting a minor, would be a grave violation of these teachings. Moreover, grooming or soliciting explicit images from anyone, particularly minors, contradicts the Church’s call to protect the vulnerable and uphold moral integrity. If the allegations against Jurado were proven true, they would represent a serious betrayal of the values he publicly defends. However, without evidence, these claims remain speculative. Jurado’s work as an apologist, which emphasizes defending the Eucharist, Marian theology, and Church authority, suggests a commitment to Catholic principles, but public figures are not immune to personal failings. The absence of verified reports leaves the question open, but it serves as a reminder that all Catholics, especially those in the public eye, are called to live out their faith consistently. The Dangers of Sexting and Legal Implications Sexting, particularly involving minors, is a serious issue with legal and moral ramifications. In many jurisdictions, sending or receiving explicit images of a minor constitutes child pornography, a felony offense. For example, in Texas, a minor sending a nude photo of themselves can face misdemeanor charges, while an adult receiving such images could face felony charges. These laws aim to protect minors from exploitation, but they can also ensnare teens in legal trouble for consensual acts, highlighting the complexity of addressing sexting in the digital age.[](https://www.brettpritchardlaw.com/blog/2024/february/sexting-and-legal-charges-in-texas/)[](https://www.nedbarnett.com/practice-areas/child-sex-crimes/sexting-minors/) The allegations against Jurado, if true, would likely fall under such laws, given the claim of involvement with a 14-year-old girl. However, without evidence, it is impossible to assess the validity of these claims or their legal implications. The broader issue of sexting underscores the need for education on digital safety, consent, and the consequences of sharing intimate images, particularly for young people navigating online spaces.[](https://www.esafety.gov.au/parents/issues-and-advice/sending-nudes-sexting)[](https://www.mmguardian.com/blog/teen-sexting) The Role of Social Media in Shaping Narratives Social media platforms like X are double-edged swords: they amplify voices like Jurado’s, allowing him to reach thousands with his apologetics, but they also provide a platform for unverified accusations. The posts on X about Jurado illustrate how quickly rumors can spread, often fueled by personal biases or agendas, as seen in the offensive generalization in one post. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and discernment when evaluating online claims, especially about controversial figures. Catholic apologists, like all public figures, face heightened scrutiny. Their visibility makes them targets for both legitimate criticism and unfounded attacks. The lack of evidence in Jurado’s case suggests these allegations may be an attempt to discredit his work, but they also serve as a cautionary tale about the need for transparency and accountability in public ministry. A Call for Truth and Charity As of now, there is no credible evidence to support the allegations that Alex Jurado engaged in a sexting scandal with a 14-year-old girl or used women to obtain nudes. The claims, originating from unverified posts on X, remain speculative and should be approached with caution. While the Catholic Church and its representatives must uphold the highest standards of moral conduct, accusations without proof risk causing unjust harm and sowing division. This situation underscores the challenges of navigating faith and public life in the digital age. Catholics are called to seek truth, exercise charity, and avoid rash judgment (CCC 2478). For those following Jurado’s work, this is an opportunity to reflect on the importance of discernment, both in supporting public figures and in evaluating accusations against them. Until credible evidence emerges, the focus should remain on fostering dialogue, promoting digital responsibility, and upholding the values of the Catholic faith. If new information comes to light, it will be critical to address it with fairness and a commitment to justice. For now, let us pray for all involved, that truth may prevail and that those in public ministry may live out their calling with integrity.

Here are tweets with "evidence" from the accout on X. ---





















Here is an audio clip of Alex saying disgusting sexual things:




UPDATE July 14, 2025
Catholic Answers has removed the page of Alex Jurado
Screenshot of Catholic Answers' website



CORRECTION:  Alex Jurado did not work for Catholic Answers, they quoted to us a post with a correction here on X: (3) Catholic Answers on X: "Alex Jurado (AKA Voice of Reason) has never been a staff member of Catholic Answers. He was an occasional guest on our radio program, Catholic Answers Live, and, like all our radio guests, he had a profile page on https://t.co/KIOfG83Vki. In light of the recent serious" / X




UPDATE: July 15, 2025:
The amount of evidence keeps piling up that it is more than likely that most of the allegations are factually verifiable. New audio has surfaced where one can hear Alex's voice engaging in some kind of fetish phone sex dialogue, which is clearly sexually deviant. Catholic Answers removed his profile page after recently hiring him. He was scheduled to appear yesterday, July 14, 2025, on The Theology of the Body Institute livestream/video podcast program on YouTube, and that was abruptly removed. His social media accounts remain active, yet we have not heard from him or any statement.


UPDATE:
Alex Jurado's Catholic Speaker's profile page was removed on their website and Intagram ((2) Instagram):
Screenshot of the CatholicSpeakers Website







UPDATE:
Alex Jurado has posted a statement on Instagram ((2) Instagram) denying the allegations regarding a 14-year-old but acknowledges making mistakes, sinning and being a sinner. He has not denied the other allegations, nor has he directly addressed them. He is considering legal action against those who claimed he had an inappropriate relationship with a minor.



UPDATE: An account on X ((2) The Unapologists (@TheUnapologists) / X) said he would post a video on Instagram regarding the allegations. He speaks of another Catholic influenced named Jared, who is a neophyte in the Catholic faith and who apparently engaged in sexual sins with women prior to his baptism. The Uapologists then continue with the case of Alex, stating the "minor" in question was 16, not 14 and shows messages indicating this. He alleges that Alex has had sexual chats with adult women as recent as July. Apparently, there was a sexual relationship as well. Here it is below.





UPDATE: Catholic Answers quoted our post with a correction, they wrote:

"Alex Jurado (AKA Voice of Reason) has never been a staff member of Catholic Answers. He was an occasional guest on our radio program, Catholic Answers Live, and, like all our radio guests, he had a profile page on Catholic.com.
In light of the recent serious allegations about Alex, we have removed this profile from Catholic.com. We pray that the full truth may come to light, we pray for Alex, and we pray for everyone who may have been victimized, scandalized, or disedified by these reported events."
UPDATE July 16, 2025 "Theunapologist" released another video regarding Alex 'Voice of Reason' Jurado.
UPDATE:
Posts on X claim that Alex Jurado is being investigated by "authorities." One post claims Bishop Artur Bubnevych is conducting an investigation and has barred Alex from any events within his ordinary/Eparchy within the Byzantine Catholic Church (see: Bishop places restrictions on Catholic influencer accused of misconduct, pending investigation - OSV News). Bishop Artur Bubnevych of the Holy Protection of Mary Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Phoenix issued a July 16 statement to that eparchy’s clergy according to OSV News.  
UPDATE: July 23, 2025: Bishop Artur issues a letter to all priests in his eparchy banning Alex Jurado from events and activities.


UPDATE: August 17, 2025: Just 17 Minutes ago Alex Jurado issued his first video since the scandal on his YouTube account:

**Note on Sources**: The information in this post is drawn from web sources and posts on X. The evidence seems to support the allegations against Alex Jurado. We are waiting for word from Alex himself for confirmation or denial. (UPDATE: Alex Jurado issued a statement posted above regarding the allegations).

Citations include profiles from Catholic Answers and the Diocese of Brownsville, as well as legal resources on sexting laws.

Readers are encouraged to verify information independently and approach unconfirmed claims with skepticism.






Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 12, 2025

Diana Montagna Blocks Sacerdotus on X After Refutation of Her Claims on Pope Francis: A Sign of Weak Journalism?

Diana Montagna’s Block on X: A Sign of Weak Journalism?

In the fast-paced world of journalism, credibility hinges on the ability to stand by one’s work, engage with criticism, and defend claims with evidence.

Recently, journalist Diana Montagna’s decision to block @Sacerdotus on X after their critique of her articles has raised eyebrows. This move, rather than engaging with the criticism, suggests her work may lack the rigor to withstand scrutiny. Let’s explore why this action casts doubt on her credibility and the strength of her reporting. The Context: @Sacerdotus Calls Out Montagna’s Claims On July 7 and 10, 2025, X user @Sacerdotus posted critiques of Montagna’s articles, accusing her of spreading falsehoods about Pope Francis and rehashing unverified claims without providing new evidence. Specifically, @Sacerdotus challenged her for failing to include verified documentation and for relying on recycled, unconvincing content to push her narrative. These posts, which called for accountability and evidence, were met not with a robust defense but with Montagna blocking @Sacerdotus on X.

Here are our articles refuting Diane's lies and showing her inconsistencies:





We questioned her latest claims in an X post, which most likely triggered her block:

 



Blocking Criticism: A Red Flag for Credibility When a journalist blocks a critic rather than addressing their points, it sends a troubling message. Criticism, especially in the public square of X, is a crucible for testing the strength of one’s work. By choosing to silence @Sacerdotus, Montagna avoided the opportunity to defend her articles with facts or counterarguments. This suggests her claims may be too weak to withstand scrutiny, as a confident journalist would engage, refute, or clarify rather than retreat. The act of blocking implies an inability—or unwillingness—to stand by her content. As Theodore Roosevelt once said, “It is not the critic who counts… The credit belongs to the man who strives, who dares greatly, and who perseveres despite criticism.” By shutting out critique, Montagna sidesteps the striving and perseverance that define credible journalism. Her actions align more with Aristotle’s quip: “There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing, and be nothing.” In this case, her silence speaks volumes. Why Her Articles Are “Bunk” @Sacerdotus’s posts pointed out specific issues with Montagna’s reporting, including a lack of new evidence and reliance on unverified documentation. Without engaging these critiques, Montagna leaves the impression that her articles cannot be defended. Journalism demands transparency and accountability—qualities absent when a writer dodges vetting. If her claims about Pope Francis or other topics were grounded in solid evidence, she could have easily countered @Sacerdotus with primary sources, verified documents, or a reasoned argument. Instead, her block suggests her work may crumble under the “fire of criticism and vetting.” This pattern isn’t unique to Montagna. Other figures, like Diana Nyad, faced similar accusations of falsehoods and struggled to defend their claims when confronted with evidence. Nyad’s PR team, for instance, avoided direct responses to critics, much like Montagna’s block of @Sacerdotus. When journalists or public figures evade scrutiny, it often signals that their narratives rely on shaky foundations.[](https://defector.com/diana-nyads-swimming-brought-her-glory-fame-and-an-adversary-dedicated-to-exposing-her-lies) The Broader Implications Montagna’s decision to block criticism reflects a broader issue in modern journalism: the temptation to prioritize narrative over truth. When journalists silence detractors rather than engage, they undermine their own credibility and erode public trust. X, as a platform, thrives on open discourse, where ideas are tested and falsehoods exposed. By opting out of this process, Montagna not only weakens her own standing but also fuels skepticism about her work’s reliability. Winston Churchill once noted, “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” Facing criticism head-on is a badge of courage for those who stand by their convictions. Montagna’s block, however, suggests she’s unwilling to defend her stance, leaving readers to question whether her articles are more about pushing an agenda than uncovering truth. Credibility Requires Courage Diana Montagna’s choice to block @Sacerdotus rather than address their critiques is a telling moment. It suggests her articles may lack the substance to withstand rigorous vetting, as credible journalism should. By avoiding the fire of criticism, she casts doubt on her ability to stand by her content, leaving readers to wonder if her reporting is more “bunk” than truth. In an era where accountability is paramount, journalists must embrace scrutiny, not hide from it. Until Montagna engages with her critics openly, her credibility—and the integrity of her work—will remain in question.
UPDATE July 13, 2025
Diana also blocked us on her Substack.





Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, June 12, 2025

Refuting Claims of the Term “Novus Ordo” in Reference to the Mass of Paul VI: A Response to @pluant ’s Assertions

Refuting Claims of the Term “Novus Ordo” in Reference to the Mass of Paul VI: A Response to 

@pluant
’s Assertions
The X account
@pluant
has repeatedly claimed that Pope Paul VI used the term “Novus Ordo” to refer to the post-Vatican II Mass, often contrasting it with the “Traditional Latin Mass” or Tridentine Mass as a distinct and inferior rite. These claims contribute to a broader narrative among some Catholic traditionalists that the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite, promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1969, represents a rupture from Catholic tradition. This post refutes
@pluant
’s assertions, specifically addressing their exchanges with
@Sacerdotus
, by examining the historical, theological, and documentary evidence surrounding the terminology of the Mass. It demonstrates that Paul VI did not use “Novus Ordo” as an official title for the Mass, that the term is informal and not found in key liturgical documents, and that the Mass, by default, is traditional within the unified Roman Rite, as clarified by the Church.



@pluant
’s Claims and Context
In a series of X posts,
@pluant
has engaged with
@Sacerdotus
, asserting that the term “Novus Ordo” is an appropriate designation for the post-Vatican II Mass and implying its use by Paul VI. For example:
  • On May 24, 2025,
    @pluant
    tweeted, “The Novus Ordo is already hyper clericalist. It is overloaded with options, all at the cleric’s discretion. The genius of the Old Rite is that everyone is equally a servant of the rite” (
    @pluant
    , May 24, 2025). This post uses “Novus Ordo” to contrast the Ordinary Form with the “Old Rite,” suggesting a fundamental difference in nature.
  • On May 26, 2025,
    @pluant
    stated, “It’s always really been about eliminating anything vaguely traditional from the Novus Ordo” (
    @pluant
    , May 26, 2025), reinforcing the notion that the “Novus Ordo” is a deliberate departure from tradition.
  • In response to
    @Sacerdotus
    ’s challenge on May 31, 2025, that “Novus Ordo Missae” does not mean “Novus Ordo Mass” and is absent from the 1970 Roman Missal,
    @pluant
    persisted in defending the term’s usage, citing Paul VI’s alleged endorsement (
    @pluant
    , May 31, 2025).
These claims align with a traditionalist narrative that the post-Vatican II Mass, often called “Novus Ordo,” is a modernist innovation, distinct from the traditional Mass.
@pluant
’s posts reflect a misunderstanding of liturgical terminology and Church teaching, as well as a rejection of the unity of the Roman Rite, which comprises two expressions: the Ordinary Form and the Extraordinary Form.
Refutation: The Term “Novus Ordo” in Official Usage
Contrary to
@pluant
’s assertions, the term “Novus Ordo” is not an official title used by the Church or Pope Paul VI to designate the revised Roman Missal of 1969. The following points clarify this:
  1. Official Documents and Paul VI’s Terminology:
    • The apostolic constitution Missale Romanum (April 3, 1969), promulgated by Paul VI, does not use “Novus Ordo” or “Novus Ordo Missae” to describe the revised Mass. Instead, it refers to the “Roman Missal, renewed by decree of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council” (Missale Romanum ex decreto Sacrosancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II instauratum) (Paul VI, 1969). This emphasizes continuity with the Roman Rite, not a new or separate liturgy.
    • In his November 26, 1969, general audience address, Paul VI described the revised Mass as a “new rite of the Mass” but clarified, “It is not a new Mass, but a new form of celebration” (Paul VI, 1969). This statement, cited by
      @Sanothomas
      , underscores that Paul VI viewed the reform as a development within the existing Roman Rite, not a novel creation. The phrase “novus Ordo Missae” appears in a 1976 address, but only descriptively, as “the new Order has been promulgated” (novus Ordo promulgatus est), not as an official title (Paul VI, 1976).
    • The General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) and other liturgical documents, such as the 1970, 1975, and 2002 editions of the Missal, consistently use “Roman Missal” or “Order of Mass” (Ordo Missae), without adopting “Novus Ordo” as a formal term (GIRM, 2002).
  2. Origin of “Novus Ordo”:
    • The term “Novus Ordo Missae” emerged in the context of the 1969 Ordo Missae (Order of Mass), a liturgical book outlining the revised rite. However, it was not an official title but a shorthand used by some liturgists and critics, notably in the “Ottaviani Intervention” (1969), where Cardinals Alfredo Ottaviani and Antonio Bacci critiqued the “Novus Ordo Missae” as a departure from Trent’s theology (Ottaviani & Bacci, 1969). The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith responded on November 12, 1969, calling their critique “superficial, exaggerated, inexact, emotional, and false,” and Paul VI incorporated some of their feedback into the final Missal, indicating responsiveness rather than endorsement of the term (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1969).
    • Yves Chiron notes that the term gained traction among traditionalists as a pejorative label, not as an official designation, and was rarely used by Paul VI except in passing (Chiron, 2021). The Church’s preference, as clarified by Benedict XVI in Summorum Pontificum (2007), is to refer to the 1969 Missal as the Ordinary Form and the 1962 Missal as the Extraordinary Form, emphasizing their unity within the Roman Rite (Benedict XVI, 2007).
  3. Church Teaching on the Unity of the Roman Rite:
    • The Church teaches that the Roman Rite has one Mass with two valid expressions, both traditional by nature. Benedict XVI stated, “The two Roman Missals, although four centuries have intervened, embrace one and the same tradition” (GIRM, 6). The Ordinary Form retains the essential structure of the Tridentine Mass, including the Penitential Rite, Gloria, Scripture readings, Roman Canon, and Communion Rite, with adaptations for accessibility and inculturation (Faggioli, 2012).
    • @pluant
      ’s claim that the “Novus Ordo” is “hyper clericalist” or a modernist deviation (
      @pluant
      , May 24, 2025) ignores the sacrificial nature of the Ordinary Form, explicitly affirmed in the GIRM (e.g., “my sacrifice and yours”) and the Catechism (1366-1367). The flexibility of the Ordinary Form, such as multiple Eucharistic Prayers, reflects Vatican II’s call for active participation and cultural adaptation, not a rejection of tradition (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 37-40).
Why
@pluant
’s Claims Are Incorrect
@pluant
’s assertions are flawed for several reasons:
  • Misattribution of Terminology: By claiming Paul VI used “Novus Ordo” as an official title,
    @pluant
    misrepresents the historical record. Paul VI’s rare use of “novus Ordo Missae” was descriptive, not titular, and his primary focus was on the Mass’s continuity with tradition (Paul VI, 1969). The 1970 Roman Missal and subsequent documents avoid the term, favoring “Roman Missal” or “Order of Mass” (GIRM, 2002).
  • False Dichotomy:
    @pluant
    ’s contrast between the “Novus Ordo” and the “Old Rite” (
    @pluant
    , May 24, 2025) perpetuates a false dichotomy, ignoring the Church’s teaching that both forms are expressions of the same Roman Rite. This view aligns with traditionalist narratives that reject Vatican II’s legitimacy, resembling the Pharisaical legalism critiqued in Matthew 23:23 for prioritizing ritual over charity and obedience.
  • Lack of Canonical Support: The insistence on “Novus Ordo” as a distinct, inferior rite lacks support in Church documents.
    @Sacerdotus
    correctly notes, “The correct term for the Mass of Paul VI is the ORDINARY FORM” (
    @Sacerdotus
    , May 31, 2025), aligning with Summorum Pontificum and the GIRM.
    @pluant
    ’s rejection of this terminology reflects a broader disobedience to Church authority, a trait noted in traditionalist circles (Ripperger, 2019).
Psychological and Ideological Context
@pluant
’s persistence in using “Novus Ordo” pejoratively may reflect psychological tendencies observed in some traditionalists, such as neurotic fixation on liturgical purity or narcissistic grandiosity in claiming superior understanding of Catholic tradition (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These traits can foster a siege mentality, where traditionalists view themselves as defenders against a “modernist” Church, as described by Naumescu (2002). This mindset may drive
@pluant
’s dismissal of the Ordinary Form as “hyper clericalist” or a tool to “eliminate” tradition (
@pluant
, May 24-26, 2025), despite the Church’s affirmation of its validity and traditional roots.
Conclusion
The claims by
@pluant
that Pope Paul VI used “Novus Ordo” to designate the post-Vatican II Mass as a distinct rite are incorrect. Official documents, including Missale Romanum (1969) and Summorum Pontificum (2007), confirm that the term is informal, not titular, and that Paul VI emphasized the Mass’s continuity with tradition. The Roman Rite comprises one Mass with two expressions—Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms—both traditional and valid.
@pluant
’s rhetoric, as seen in their X posts to
@Sacerdotus
, perpetuates a divisive narrative that contradicts Church teaching and may reflect underlying ideological or psychological rigidity. Catholics are called to unity and obedience, recognizing the Mass’s sacrificial essence across both forms, as affirmed by the Magisterium.
References
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Arlington, VA: APA.
  • Benedict XVI. (2007). Summorum Pontificum. Vatican City.
  • Catechism of the Catholic Church. (1994). Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
  • Chiron, Y. (2021). How the Novus Ordo Mass Was Made. Church Life Journal.
  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1969). Response to the Short Critical Study. Vatican City.
  • Faggioli, M. (2012). Vatican II: The Battle for Meaning. Paulist Press.
  • General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM). (2002). United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
  • Ottaviani, A., & Bacci, A. (1969). Short Critical Study of the New Order of Mass. Rome.
  • Paul VI. (1969). Missale Romanum. Vatican City.
  • Paul VI. (1969). General Audience Address, November 26. Vatican City.
  • Paul VI. (1976). Address at Consistory, May 24. Vatican City.
  • Ripperger, C. (2019). 10 Problems in the Traditional Catholic Movement. Tumblar House.
  • Sacrosanctum Concilium. (1963). Vatican City: Second Vatican Council.
  • Wikipedia. (2002). Traditionalist Catholicism.
  • X Posts:
    @pluant
    , May 24-31, 2025;
    @Sacerdotus
    , May 31, 2025;
    @Sanothomas
    , May 30, 2025.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Labels

Catholic Church (1207) God (535) Jesus (527) Bible (446) Atheism (377) Jesus Christ (355) Pope Francis (302) Atheist (259) Liturgy of the Word (256) Science (195) Christianity (165) LGBT (147) Apologetics (106) Gay (92) Abortion (89) Liturgy (88) Pope Benedict XVI (86) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Blessed Virgin Mary (80) Philosophy (80) Prayer (72) Theology (66) Physics (63) Vatican (60) President Obama (57) Psychology (55) Christian (54) Christmas (53) New York City (53) Holy Eucharist (52) Traditionalists (51) Biology (43) Health (41) Women (39) Politics (37) Baseball (34) Supreme Court (34) Vatican II (31) Protestant (30) Racism (30) Gospel (29) Pope John Paul II (29) NYPD (28) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Illegal Immigrants (26) priests (26) Death (25) Priesthood (24) Astrophysics (23) Evangelization (23) Donald Trump (22) Christ (20) Evil (20) First Amendment (20) Eucharist (19) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Pro Choice (17) Morality (16) Pedophilia (16) Police (16) Divine Mercy (15) Easter Sunday (15) Marriage (15) Jewish (14) Gender Theory (13) Pentecostals (13) Autism (12) Blog (12) Holy Trinity (12) September 11 (12) Cognitive Psychology (11) Muslims (11) Poverty (11) CUNY (10) Pope Paul VI (10) Sacraments (10) academia (10) Hispanics (9) Massimo Pigliucci (9) Personhood (9) Big Bang Theory (8) Evidence (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Barack Obama (7) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Podcast (7) Spiritual Life (7) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Hell (6) Babies (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Eastern Orthodox (5) Evangelicals (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Angels (4) Donations (4) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Encyclical (3) Founding Fathers (3) Pluto (3) Baby Jesus (2) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)