Showing posts with label Americans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Americans. Show all posts

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Pope: 'It's An Honor that Americans Attack Me'

While on his way to Maputo, Mozambique in Africa, Pope Francis made some comments which have ignited an already brewing war.  He said that he is "honored" to be attacked by Americans. The pope said this after he was presented with a book authored by a French reporter Nicolas Seneze. This book entails the strong opposition his papacy has received from those who call themselves "traditionalists" and the media calls "conservatives."

As the book was handed to him, the pope joked stating, "this is a bomb" alluding to the contents in the book.  The pope then said in Italian,  "Per me รจ un onore che mi attaccano gli americani (For me it’s an honor that Americans attack me).” The press onboard, including those from the Vatican were dismayed at the words and pressed to get more details.  Vatican spokesman for the press, Matteo Bruni verified the remarks and explained them stating,  “In an informal context, the Pope wanted to say that he always considers criticisms an honor, particularly when they come from authoritative thinkers and, in this case, an important nation.” 

Seneze added that his book details how a wealthy faction in the American Church is seeking to remove the pope or force him to resign. He mentions EWTN Global Catholic Network, LifeSite News and other as the main culprits.

As expected, the remarks set ablaze this faction of so-called "traditionalists" found mostly online. They took to social media and blogs to voice their anger against the Holy Father. Many saw the remarks as a battle cry from the pope and replied to him, "oh, it is on!" 

I cannot speak for the pope or for those in the book, but I can speak to what I have witnessed online.  There is clearly a disregard for the pontificate of Pope Francis on social media by a faction that describes itself as "traditionalists." There is no denying this. In fact, I have lost followers over this. Some have blocked me. I have mentioned this before on previous posts of how after the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, the catholicsphere online dissolved. I remember a time where Catholics would follow each other, share each other's content and even help one another engage atheists, protestants and pro-abortion supporters. After Pope Francis was elected, things began to slow down in this regard. After Amoris Laetitia, it got worse. This was when I began to see accusations of heresy and antipope circle about the catholicsphere online.  Books began to come out with the most recent one by Taylor Marshall which mostly reads like a conspiracy drama-spy novel. Now every word and action by the pope is filtered via the lens of "heretic." The "viva il Papa" phenomenon has died, it seems.

As stated before, followers of mine began to act more like fundamentalists and started to attack Vatican II, the Ordinary Form and even Communion on the hand. It has totally gotten out of hand, in my opinion. It is no wonder why the pope said that the book written by Seneze is "a bomb." Pope Francis should really look at social media and see the angry tweets about him.  How did this happen?  Well, everyone is to blame, I think. First, the pope has not had a good track record in regards to clarity. He makes remarks that seem contradictory or ambiguous. I know that being Latino, he has a way of communicating which mostly Latinos will understand. However, as a global leader, he has to be able to speak to all and set aside the colloquialisms that often cause confusion.  I think this is what began the accusations of heresy. The pope would say something that was not fully understood.  Then the media spun it and it went haywire in the minds of Catholics and others online. However, the pope is not to blame solely. I think those who call themselves "traditionalists" are also to blame. Many of them pretend to hold a claim to Catholicism which is not reflective of their role in the Church. What I mean is that there are some "traditionalists" who feel they are the guardians of the faith and that the faith is only properly understood via their interpretation. I see this a lot, especially with the Liturgy. There are those who will get upset when you cite sources disproving their misconceptions. Instead of relying on facts, they rely on conspiracy theories and misinformation.  One such instance is the idea that the Ordinary Form is an innovation called the "Novus Ordo." Another is that Communion on the tongue is the only proper way to receive Communion. Then there is the endless attacks on Vatican II and the blaming of the council for abuses seen around the globe.

These kinds of attitudes are what led the pope to criticize those in the Church who are "rigid." By rigid, he does not mean those who practice the faith correctly. He means those who are not flexible with their approach to faith.  In other words, like the Pharisees, a rigid Catholic cannot see past the black and white of the law into the gray. A person who received by the hand is automatically irreverent. A gay person is automatically condemned. Women who do not wear a veil are automatically seen as sinful. I can go on and on, but we get the point.  This is what the pope means by those who are rigid. We cannot be so rigid so as to become robots following rules and forgetting about that rules were made to serve the people.  Now not all so-called "traditionalists" are like this.  We have to be clear about this.  There are just some who become fundamentalists to the point of presenting themselves as being more Catholic than the pope.  This is clearly something much deeper, perhaps a mental condition.  In any event, the combination of the pope's poor communication and those Catholics who call themselves "traditionalists" is the root cause of this division, in my opinion. 

The comment that the pope sees it an honor to be attacked was a bit too much. It comes across as defiant and arrogant to some, and understandably so.  If the pope feels honored to be attacked by Americans, then he should have been more specific and not leave it open to interpretation.  Many are interpreting it as a battle cry.   Moreover, I know the pope was referring to "Americans" mentioned in the book by Seneze, but these so-called "traditionalists"  who do not like his pontificate come from all over. 


What do you think?  Post below on disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules on commenting.       





Source:


https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/04/world/pope-honor-americans/index.html

https://cruxnow.com/pope-in-madagascar/2019/09/04/pope-francis-says-its-an-honor-that-americans-are-attacking-me/

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/honor

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-says-its-an-honor-to-be-criticized-by-conservatives-in-us-today-2019-09-04/



Tuesday, September 5, 2017

DACA is Deported

The DACA program or "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals" was rescinded today by President Donald J. Trump via Attorney General Jeff Sessions. DACA was introduced via the executive branch in 2012 by former President Obama. The program was meant to prevent the deportation of children of illegal immigrants who were brought here. These people obviously grew up in America and know nothing of their nation of birth.

Many find their stories heartbreaking, and rightfully so. These people did not ask to be brought here at an early age. To better the situation, Obama ordered the DACA program be put into place. Along with preventing deportation, DACA applicants would be allowed to work in the United States, but would then have to renew this permit. They were only allowed to stay in the United States for two years. However, no one wants to be deported so obviously, they all stayed here. This is where the problem begins.

Since these people stayed here, they have become a burden on tax payers. Tax payers have been forced to pay for the education, health and other expenses of these illegal immigrants. This is unjust and immoral. Many conservatives were upset when Obama instituted DACA which was a breach of federal law to begin with. Many "dreamers," or DACA receipients have taken to the streets to protest.
















Some in the Catholic Church have even cried foul at President Trump for ending DACA. Cardinal Dolan and many others have joined the cause claiming that Trump's actions are inhumane. The USSCB also issued a statement condeming the action of the president.





I have countered these Catholics leaders by reminding all of what the Catholic Church actually teaches about immigration. See the photo in the tweet below:






The Catholic Church teaches that each nation has a right to protect its sovereignty and borders. Those who come as immigrants must respect the laws of the nation that is housing them. Just because "dreamers" were brought here by their parents does not mean we should reward them. Once they learned that they were illegal and became of age, they should have proceeded to change their status from illegal to legal. Many of them do not do this and want to have their cake and eat it too, so to speak. Some of them have even committed crimes against Americans. Since they are undocumented, it is hard for law enforcement to locate them and prosecute them. This is just wrong. Instead of keeping illegal immigrants legal, The bishops, clergy and religious should advocate that they become legal. They should encourage parishioners who are illegal immigrants to become legal. This is the moral thing to do rather than taking a "Robin Hood" mentality to solving these kinds of problems. We cannot steal from others to help others. It is immoral.

Moreover, I come from NYC which is a very liberal and progressive town. It bothered me greatly in my college and high school years seeing friends of mine who are Puerto Rican get turned away from scholarships and other benefits in favor of illegal immigrants. How can illegal people have it easy in our nation while legal citizens are given such a hard time? This is unjust.

Some have gotten upset with me because of my tweets condemning the "dreamers" and DACA. However, they did not see what I saw in NYC nor experienced the unfairness my friends and others faced due to illegal immigrants. Furthermore, many people have suffered having their identities stolen by illegal immigrants. This is wrong. Imagine working all of your life, doing the right thing, obeying the law and you find out someone was using your social security number to live a lavish life in the shadows of the law. This is what has happened to many people I know. In Puerto Rico, birth certificates had to be reissued because Dominicans and others were stealing the identities of Puerto Ricans. Some were using the certificates and social security numbers of the deceased!

We must not let misguided compassion get the best of us. I as a rational person see black and white, right and wrong. Immigrants are all welcome here, but they must follow the laws. Moreover, the media is painting "dreamers" as kids when in fact they are young adults. Again, they are capable of applying to citizenship. What is stopping them? Do they want freebies? Do they want to live above the law? We cannot have this.

The end of DACA today does not mean lost hope for "dreamers." President Trump tweeted that he wants Congress to find a legal way to keep DACA and gave a six month timeline to do so. If they do not, he tweeted that he will revisit the issue. Clearly, Trump is not this coldhearted man the media is portraying him as. He wants to do things right and legally. While he is not perfect, we must applaud his respect for the executive branch and how it relates to the law.






Let us pray for all. I know it is hard for "dreamers," but there are better options. Living here illegally and not doing anything to change that status is wrong. Taking advantage of welfare and other benefits meant for citizens who are struggling is immoral.  Illegal immigrants need to show sincerity and do the right thing by becoming legal if they really love our nation and want their dreams realized.





Source:

http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2017/09/05/14-things-msm-wont-tell-daca/

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/05/politics/jeff-sessions-trump-daca-decision/index.html?sr=twCNN090617jeff-sessions-trump-daca-decision1055AMVODtop

http://www.illegalaliencrimereport.com/murder/dreamer-shot-young-man-to-death-in-arizona/

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/09/05/ag-jeff-sessions-announces-end-of-daca-immigration-policy/23197431/


Thursday, March 7, 2013

Drones can Kill Americans


A big commotion is unfolding in Washington, DC.  Attorney General Eric Holder stated in a letter to Senator Rand Paul that the President has the authority to launch a drone attack against any American citizen without a trial.  The words are indeed troubling.  In a nation that prides itself on the words, "Innocent until proven guilty," the suggestion that the President can have any American killed via a drone at will without trial is indeed something all Americans should be concerned with.  Rand Paul is now doing some old fashion filibustering by attempting to block the confirmation of John Brennan as CIA director in order to garner attention to the issue.

Rand Paul said:

“I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first to be found guilty by a court."
This issue is now adding fire to the gun debate where some fear that the government is getting too powerful and citizens must have arms ready in case tyranny shows its ugly head.

It is indeed a scary time to be an American.  



Source:

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/345040

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/05/holder-drone-strike-against-americans-in-the-u-s-possible/

Labels

Catholic Church (1189) God (528) Jesus (514) Bible (435) Atheism (376) Jesus Christ (352) Pope Francis (297) Atheist (258) Liturgy of the Word (254) Science (195) Christianity (163) LGBT (147) Apologetics (103) Gay (90) Abortion (89) Pope Benedict XVI (86) Liturgy (84) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Philosophy (80) Blessed Virgin Mary (79) Prayer (72) Physics (63) Theology (61) Vatican (60) President Obama (57) Psychology (55) Christian (54) Christmas (53) New York City (53) Holy Eucharist (52) Traditionalists (47) Biology (43) Health (41) Women (39) Politics (36) Baseball (34) Supreme Court (34) Protestant (30) Racism (30) NYPD (28) Pope John Paul II (28) Religious Freedom (27) Illegal Immigrants (26) Space (26) Vatican II (26) priests (26) Death (25) Gospel (25) Priesthood (24) Astrophysics (23) Evangelization (23) Donald Trump (22) Christ (20) Evil (20) First Amendment (20) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Eucharist (17) Pro Choice (17) Morality (16) Pedophilia (16) Police (16) Divine Mercy (15) Easter Sunday (15) Marriage (15) Jewish (14) Gender Theory (13) Autism (12) Blog (12) Holy Trinity (12) Pentecostals (12) Cognitive Psychology (11) Muslims (11) Poverty (11) September 11 (11) CUNY (10) Sacraments (10) academia (10) Hispanics (9) Massimo Pigliucci (9) Personhood (9) Big Bang Theory (8) Evidence (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Pope Paul VI (8) Barack Obama (7) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Podcast (7) Spiritual Life (7) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Hell (6) Babies (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Eastern Orthodox (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Angels (4) Donations (4) Ephebophilia (4) Evangelicals (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Encyclical (3) Founding Fathers (3) Pluto (3) Baby Jesus (2) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)