In the crisp December air, as families around the globe prepare for Christmas with visions of a jolly, gift-giving Santa Claus, few pause to remember the real man behind the myth: St. Nicholas of Myra, the fourth-century bishop whose life was a testament to bold faith, unyielding charity, and a legendary defense of Christ's divinity. Today, on his feast day, we are reminded not just of the saint who inspired legends of secret generosity, but of the warrior of orthodoxy who once resorted to physical confrontation to safeguard the eternal truth of the Incarnation. This story of a punch thrown in the halls of Nicaea resonates profoundly with the words spoken just weeks ago by Pope Leo XIV in Turkey – words that diagnose a creeping "new Arianism" in our own time, where Jesus is all too often stripped of his divine glory and reduced to a mere footnote in human history.
As we mark the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, the birthplace of the Nicene Creed, it's fitting to revisit these ancient battles of belief. Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, born Robert Francis Prevost in Chicago and elected on May 8, 2025, chose the historic sites of Istanbul and Iznik (ancient Nicaea) for his inaugural apostolic journey from November 27 to December 2, 2025. There, amid the ruins of basilicas and the echoes of early Christian councils, he issued a clarion call: The Church must confront the resurgence of heresies old and new. In a address at the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit in Istanbul on November 28, 2025, Leo warned of a "new Arianism" that diminishes Jesus to "a great historical figure, a wise teacher, or a prophet who fought for justice – nothing more." This modern echo of an ancient error, he argued, overshadows Christ's "divinity, his lordship over history," treating the Incarnation as a mere metaphor rather than the scandalous reality that God became man to redeem us.
In this blog post, we'll journey back to the sands of Myra and the heated debates of Nicaea, unpacking the heresy of Arianism, the fiery intervention of St. Nicholas, and the profound parallels Pope Leo XIV drew during his Turkish pilgrimage. We'll explore how this "new Arianism" manifests today – in Protestant circles that emphasize Jesus as moral exemplar over divine Savior, in secular academies that relegate him to philosopher or philanthropist, and even in pockets of the Catholic Church where faith risks becoming a diluted humanism. At roughly 3,000 words, this reflection aims not just to inform but to ignite a renewed devotion to the homoousios – the consubstantiality of Father and Son – that St. Nicholas defended with his fists and Pope Leo now proclaims with pastoral urgency. Let us begin where it all started: in the bustling port city of Myra, with a bishop whose legacy transcends tinsel and toys.
The Humble Origins of a Heavenly Defender: The Life of St. Nicholas
St. Nicholas, born around 270 AD in the Greek-speaking region of Lycia (modern-day Turkey), entered a world still raw from the persecutions of the Roman Empire. His parents, wealthy Christians named Epiphanius and Johanna, perished in a plague when he was young, leaving him under the care of his uncle – the bishop of Myra. This early loss forged in Nicholas a profound empathy for the vulnerable, a trait that would define his ministry. Tradition holds that, upon reaching manhood, Nicholas was ordained a priest and swiftly elevated to bishop, perhaps even miraculously so, when his uncle had a vision naming him successor.
Myra, a thriving seaport on the southern coast of Asia Minor, was a crossroads of cultures and creeds. As bishop, Nicholas immersed himself in the spiritual and material needs of his flock. The stories of his miracles abound: He is said to have calmed a violent storm at sea, saving sailors' lives; resurrected three murdered boys from a pickling barrel, outwitting a wicked innkeeper; and, most famously, anonymously tossed bags of gold through the window of a despairing father's home to provide dowries for his three impoverished daughters, preventing their fall into prostitution. These acts of stealthy benevolence – performed on the eve of the feast of the local saint – birthed the custom of St. Nicholas Day gifts, evolving in the West into the Santa Claus we know today.
But St. Nicholas was no mere miracle-worker or philanthropist; he was a shepherd of souls in an era when heresy threatened to devour the flock. The late third century saw the rise of Arianism, a theological poison spreading from Alexandria like wildfire through dry tinder. As bishop, Nicholas preached tirelessly against it, but his true moment of legend came not in quiet counsel, but in the imperial summons to Nicaea in 325 AD. Emperor Constantine I, seeking to unify his fractured empire, convened the first ecumenical council to settle the Christological debates tearing at the Church's seams. Over 300 bishops gathered, including the weathered Nicholas of Myra, to confront the teachings of Arius – a presbyter whose ideas, if unchecked, would redefine Christianity forever.
Nicholas arrived not as a distant scholar, but as a man of the people: battle-scarred from Diocletian's persecutions (he had been imprisoned and tortured for his faith), his body marked by chains, his spirit unbroken. Little did he know that within those council walls, his passion would lead to an act so human, so raw, that it has inspired art, debate, and devotion for 1,700 years.
The Poison of Division: Unpacking the Heresy of Arianism
To grasp the stakes of Nicaea – and why St. Nicholas's intervention was no mere temper tantrum – we must first dissect Arianism. Named after Arius, an ascetic and eloquent presbyter in Alexandria, this heresy didn't emerge in a vacuum. The early Church grappled with profound questions: How could the eternal God enter time as a man? What does "Son of God" truly mean? Arius, influenced by a strict monotheism and Greek philosophical notions of an unbegotten, immutable divine essence, sought to protect God's oneness (the Shema of Deuteronomy 6:4) from any hint of polytheism.
Arius taught that the Father alone is truly eternal and uncreated. The Son – Jesus Christ – is not co-eternal or of the same substance (homoousios) as the Father. Instead, the Son is a created being, the first and highest of God's creations, begotten "before time" but not from eternity. In Arius's infamous poetic jingle, "There was a time when He was not," implying the Son had a beginning, albeit a primordial one. Jesus, then, is divine in a subordinate sense – a perfect creature, the Logos through whom all else was made, but not God Himself. He could suffer, die, and be exalted, but His divinity is derivative, not equal to the Father's.
This wasn't abstract theology; it was explosive. Arianism appealed to the empire's intellectuals for its rationalism and to the masses for its simplicity. It spread rapidly: Emperor Constantine's own sister favored it, and missionaries carried it to the Goths and Vandals, turning "barbarian" tribes into Arian Christians who later sacked orthodox cities. If Arianism prevailed, the Incarnation – God truly becoming man in Jesus – crumbles. Salvation becomes impossible: How can a creature redeem creation? The sacraments lose their divine efficacy; the Church becomes a human society debating ethics rather than dispensing grace. As Athanasius of Alexandria later thundered, "The Son is not God, but He through whom God made the world; therefore, He is a work of God."
The Council of Nicaea, convened in May 325 AD in the lakeside town of Nicaea (modern Iznik, Turkey), was Constantine's bid for imperial unity. But for the bishops, it was a battle for the soul of faith. Arius arrived with supporters, including Eusebius of Nicomedia, armed with scrolls and sophistries. The debates raged for weeks: Was the Son "of the same substance" as the Father? Arius argued no – the Son is homoiousios (similar substance), a nuanced but devastating distinction. The majority, led by Alexander of Alexandria and his deacon Athanasius (future "Father of Orthodoxy"), insisted on homoousios: same essence, co-eternal, begotten not made.
Into this fray stepped St. Nicholas. Tradition, preserved in Byzantine hagiographies and medieval icons, recounts that during one heated session, Arius expounded his views with smug eloquence. Nicholas, unable to bear the blasphemy – the denial of Christ's full divinity – rose in fury. Crossing the hall, he confronted Arius directly, delivering a resounding slap (or punch, in some accounts) to the heretic's face. The chamber fell silent. Outraged, Arius's allies seized Nicholas, stripping him of his bishop's symbols – his omophorion (stole) and Gospel book – and dragging him before Constantine in chains. The emperor, torn between admiration for Nicholas's zeal and the need for order, reportedly ordered him imprisoned or even executed.
Miraculously, visions intervened: Mary the Mother of God appeared to Constantine and other bishops, advocating for Nicholas. He was released, restored to his seat, and the council pressed on. On June 19, 325 AD, the bishops promulgated the Nicene Creed: "We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one Being with the Father." Arius was exiled, his books burned. Nicaea triumphed – but Arianism lingered, resurfacing in councils and emperors for centuries, until Theodosius I's Edict of Thessalonica in 380 AD made Nicene faith the empire's law.
Why did Nicholas strike? Not from mere anger, but from love – agape turned to righteous indignation. For him, Arianism wasn't a debatable opinion; it was an assault on the God-man whose blood he had seen in icons and whose presence he felt in the Eucharist. As one medieval text puts it, Nicholas acted "for the honor of the Creator," embodying the biblical call to "contend for the faith once delivered" (Jude 1:3). His punch, apocryphal or not, symbolizes the Church's visceral defense of mystery against reductionism. In an age of emperors and councils, one bishop's fist reminded all: Christ's divinity is worth fighting for.
Echoes Across Millennia: The Punch Heard 'Round the Church
The legacy of Nicaea and Nicholas didn't fade with the council's adjournment. Arianism mutated, influencing barbarian kingdoms and even prompting semi-Arian compromises at councils like Antioch (341 AD). It took Athanasius's exiles and the Cappadocian Fathers' clarifications to fully entrench orthodoxy. St. Nicholas, canonized swiftly after his death on December 6, 343 AD, became a touchstone of fidelity. His relics, enshrined in Bari, Italy, since 1087, draw pilgrims seeking his intercession as protector of children, sailors, and the orthodox faith.
Fast-forward 1,700 years, and the anniversary of Nicaea coincides with a pontificate uniquely poised to reclaim its spirit. Pope Leo XIV, a Augustinian friar with missionary roots in Peru and a Chicago upbringing, embodies the "logic of littleness" he preached in Istanbul. Elected amid the Jubilee Year of Hope inaugurated by Pope Francis, Leo's early months have been marked by a reserved yet resolute style – less polarizing than his predecessor, but no less committed to doctrinal clarity. His choice of name honors Leo XIII's social teachings, adapting them to AI and inequality, but his Turkish journey revealed a theologian's heart, steeped in patristics.
Leo's pilgrimage to Turkey and Lebanon, from November 27 to December 2, 2025, was no ordinary trip. It commemorated Nicaea while addressing contemporary fractures: ecumenical divides, refugee crises, and cultural secularism. In Istanbul's Holy Spirit Cathedral, before a tiny Catholic flock (0.05% of Turkey's 85 million), Leo invoked Nicaea's three enduring challenges: grasping faith's essence, rediscovering Christ's face as the Father's, and the organic development of doctrine. But it was his diagnosis of "new Arianism" that electrified listeners.
"There is also another challenge, which we might call a 'new Arianism,' present in today’s culture and sometimes even among believers," Leo declared. "This occurs when Jesus is admired on a merely human level, perhaps even with religious respect, yet not truly regarded as the living and true God among us. His divinity, his lordship over history, is overshadowed, and he is reduced to a great historical figure, a wise teacher, or a prophet who fought for justice – but nothing more." Echoing Arius's error, this modern variant denies the Incarnation's fullness: God didn't merely appear as man (Docetism's opposite), nor was He a superhuman intermediary. No – the Word became flesh (John 1:14), consubstantial with us in humanity, yet homoousios with the Father in divinity.
Leo's words, delivered with a Midwestern steadiness, carried the weight of Nicaea's ghosts. At the ancient Basilica of St. Neophytos in Iznik on November 29, he joined Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I for an ecumenical prayer, reciting the Creed sans Filioque to honor Eastern sensibilities. There, overlooking ruins where bishops once clashed, Leo called for unity: "Overcome the scandal of the divisions," he urged, linking Nicaea's victory over Arianism to today's quest for Christian oneness. In a voice choked with emotion, tears welling, he contrasted Arius's reductionism with the Creed's bold affirmation.
What moved Leo? Perhaps the irony of location: Turkey, once Byzantium's heart, now a secular Muslim-majority state where Christians number fewer than 200,000. Or the timeliness, as global Christianity faces secular headwinds. In his onboard press conference returning to Rome, Leo reflected on the conclave that chose him, entrusting his papacy to God's hands – a humility akin to Nicholas's littleness. His warning isn't alarmism; it's a shepherd's plea, reminding us that without Christ's full divinity, hope unravels.
The New Arianism Unveiled: Jesus as Mere Man in a Godless Age
Pope Leo's invocation of "new Arianism" isn't hyperbole; it's a precise analog to Arius's crime. Just as the ancient heretic safeguarded a philosophical monotheism at divinity's expense, today's variants prioritize humanism over the supernatural. Jesus becomes an archetype – the ultimate "good guy" – but not the God who shatters graves and storms. Let's examine this heresy in action, as Leo implied, across three arenas: Protestantism, secular institutions, and even the Catholic Church.
Start with Protestantism, a broad tent where Arian echoes resound variably. In liberal mainline denominations, like some United Church of Christ or Episcopal circles, Jesus is often recast as ethical revolutionary: a first-century Gandhi championing the poor, whose "kingdom of God" is social justice sans miracles. The Resurrection? Metaphor for hope. The Eucharist? Symbolic meal. This mirrors Arius's subordinate Son – admirable, but not worthy of worship. Even in evangelical strains, prosperity gospels or moralistic therapeutic deism reduce Jesus to life coach: "What would Jesus do?" about budgets or breakups, eclipsing "Who is Jesus?" as Second Person of the Trinity. As theologian Carl Trueman notes, modern Protestantism risks "Arian functionalism," where Christ's work matters more than His being. Leo's words sting here: Such views admire Jesus "with religious respect," but deny His lordship, turning pulpits into TED Talks.
Secular institutions amplify this to caricature. In universities and media, Jesus is philosopher-philanthropist par excellence: a Stoic sage like Epictetus, or a Marxist precursor railing against Rome's one percent. Bart Ehrman's bestsellers portray Him as apocalyptic prophet whose divinity was a later invention; documentaries like Netflix's The Bible's Buried Secrets frame miracles as myth. Here, Arianism secularizes: No need for a created-but-superior Logos when He's just Homo sapiens with charisma. Public schools teach Jesus as historical figure in world religions units – "good guy" who inspired Christianity – but omit the claims that got Him crucified: "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30). Philanthropy nods abound: Jesus as original soup-kitchen volunteer, archetype of compassion. Yet, as Leo warns, this strips "his lordship over history," reducing salvation to self-help. In boardrooms and TED stages, He's motivational speaker, not Messiah – a "mere human" whose Sermon on the Mount is ethics, not eschatology.
Even the Catholic Church isn't immune, as Leo candidly admits: "sometimes even among believers." Post-Vatican II, liberation theology's zeal for the poor occasionally veered into Marxist materialism, portraying Jesus as Zealot revolutionary over divine King. Today, "inclusion" discourses can soft-pedal sin and divinity, emphasizing Jesus's humanity to affirm LGBTQ+ dignity while downplaying the hypostatic union. Homilies that dwell on "Jesus as friend" without "Jesus as God" echo Arius's intermediary. Liturgical minimalism – stripped altars, casual catechesis – risks making the Mass a humanitarian rite, not divine banquet. As Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI (echoed by Leo) observed, Western Christianity faces a "dictatorship of relativism" where truth bends to tolerance, birthing a polite Arianism: Jesus as nice guy, not narrow way.
This new heresy thrives on modernity's allergens: rationalism (doubting miracles), individualism (faith as feeling), and activism (salvation as progress). Like Arius's poetry, it's catchy – "Jesus was a refugee; follow His example!" – but lethal, severing the vine from its root (John 15:5). Leo's Turkish cry revives Nicaea: We need homoousios now, lest Christ become archetype in a pantheon of influencers.
Punching Through the Fog: Lessons from Nicholas for Today
St. Nicholas's slap wasn't license for violence – the Church condemns that – but a prophetic sign: Sometimes, truth demands confrontation. In our era of "live and let live," his fist calls us to bold witness. Imagine Nicholas at a TED Talk, decking a speaker who calls Jesus "wise teacher." Or in a seminary, challenging curricula that sideline Chalcedon. His legacy urges laity and clergy alike: Defend divinity with charity, but don't dilute it.
Pope Leo XIV channels this in his "logic of littleness." To Turkey's remnant Church, he quoted Luke 12:32: "Do not be afraid, little flock." Like Nicholas amid 300 bishops, we few faithful must trust God's kingdom grows like mustard seed. Leo's journey – meeting refugees, dialoguing with Patriarch Bartholomew – models this: Small acts, rooted in Christ's full reality, leaven the world.
A Call to Creedal Courage: Reclaiming the God-Man This Christmas
As December 6 dawns, St. Nicholas whispers: Faith fights. Pope Leo XIV proclaims: Heresy hides in plain sight. The new Arianism – Jesus as mere man, philosopher, philanthropist, archetype – robs us of joy. Only the true God-with-us conquers death, fills emptiness, transforms littleness.
This Christmas, revisit the Creed. Punch through reductions with prayer, study, witness. Honor Nicholas not with socks, but souls aflame. And heed Leo: In a world of diminished Christs, proclaim the full One – begotten, not made, God from God.
May St. Nicholas pray for us, and Pope Leo guide us, to the homoousios heart of Christmas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.