Critiquing Taylor R. Marshall’s Catholic Content: Misalignments with Authentic Catholic Teaching

Critiquing Taylor R. Marshall’s Catholic Content: Misalignments with Authentic Catholic Teaching

**EDITOR'S NOTE: We use the false term "Novus Ordo" and italicize it just for those who are accustomed to using the invalid term so they can better understand the article. The correct term for the Mass of Paul VI is the ORDINARY FORM."

Taylor R. Marshall, a former Episcopal priest turned Catholic apologist, has emerged as a leading voice in traditionalist Catholic circles through his YouTube channel, podcast, and books, notably Infiltration: The Plot to Destroy the Church from Within (2019). Marshall advocates for traditionalist Catholicism, emphasizing the Tridentine Mass and critiquing the post-Vatican II Church, particularly the Novus Ordo Missae, Vatican II’s reforms, and recent popes’ legitimacy. While his content appeals to Catholics concerned about modern Church crises, it often veers into speculative conspiracies, selective historical narratives, and rhetoric that undermines the Magisterium, thus misaligning with Catholic teaching. This paper critically examines Marshall’s claims, refuting his assertions about the Novus Ordo, Vatican II, papal authority, and Church infiltration, and argues that his approach fosters division, contradicts the Church’s indefectibility, and borders on schismatic tendencies. Drawing on Church documents, patristic sources, and scholarly analyses, we demonstrate why Marshall’s content deviates from authentic Catholic doctrine.

1. Historical and Theological Context of Marshall’s Content

Marshall’s rise coincides with post-Vatican II debates over liturgical reform and theological shifts. The Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) called for liturgical renewal to enhance active participation, resulting in the Novus Ordo Missae (1969), promulgated by Pope Paul VI (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 1963). Vatican II also addressed ecumenism, religious liberty, and episcopal collegiality, sparking traditionalist resistance from figures like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (Fiedrowicz, 2000). Marshall, a 2006 convert from Episcopalianism, aligns with this traditionalist critique, amplified through his New Saint Thomas Institute and YouTube channel, which has over 110 million downloads (Dr. Taylor Marshall, 2022;).

Marshall’s Infiltration claims that Freemasons, modernists, and other subversives have infiltrated the Church over centuries, culminating in Vatican II’s alleged errors and a corrupted hierarchy (Infiltration, 2019;). His YouTube content often criticizes Pope Francis, Vatican II, and the Novus Ordo, sometimes questioning papal legitimacy (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025;). These positions resonate with sedevacantists and ultra-traditionalists but draw criticism for promoting division and rejecting Church authority (Lewis, 2022;). Below, we refute Marshall’s key claims, highlighting their misalignment with Catholic teaching.

2. Refuting Marshall’s Critique of the Novus Ordo Missae

Marshall argues that the Novus Ordo is a Protestantized liturgy, stripped of Catholic sacrificial theology, and inferior to the Tridentine Mass (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025). He cites the removal of prayers like the Suscipe Sancte Pater and vernacular use as evidence of diminished Eucharistic doctrine, often invoking Quo Primum (1570) as binding future popes to the Tridentine rite (Infiltration, 2019;).

This critique is theologically and historically flawed. The Novus Ordo retains the Mass’s sacrificial essence, as affirmed by the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM), which calls it a “sacrifice of praise” and “memorial of Christ’s death and resurrection” (GIRM, 2002). The words of consecration, effecting the Real Presence, remain unchanged from Trent’s definitions (Tanner, 1990). New Eucharistic prayers, rooted in early Christian anaphoras, enrich the liturgy without altering its substance (Jungmann, 1948). Vernacular use, permitted by Sacrosanctum Concilium, enhances participation while preserving Latin options, reflecting the early Church’s linguistic diversity (Vatican II, 1963; Fortescue, 1912).

Marshall’s claim of Protestant influence exaggerates the role of six non-voting Protestant observers at Vatican II. The Novus Ordo was developed by Catholic liturgists under papal authority, maintaining elements like the Eucharistic Prayer absent in Protestant services (Bugnini, 1990; Ratzinger, 2000). Quo Primum is a disciplinary decree, not a dogmatic prohibition, and popes have revised liturgies since antiquity, as seen in Gregory I’s reforms (Peters, 2019;). By questioning the Novus Ordo’s validity, Marshall undermines the Church’s liturgical authority, contradicting the principle of sentire cum ecclesia (thinking with the Church) (CCC, 1994).

3. Refuting Marshall’s Rejection of Vatican II’s Orthodoxy

Marshall asserts that Vatican II’s teachings on religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio), and collegiality (Lumen Gentium) embrace modernism, contradicting pre-conciliar teachings like Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) (Infiltration, 2019;). He claims Vatican II fosters relativism and weakens Catholic exclusivity (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025).

These accusations misinterpret Vatican II’s pastoral intent and doctrinal continuity. Dignitatis Humanae affirms religious freedom based on human dignity, not indifference to truth, and upholds the Church’s mission to proclaim Christ, developing Pius XII’s teachings on conscience (Mystici Corporis, 1943; Vatican II, 1965a; Murray, 1966). The Syllabus condemned absolute liberty, not Vatican II’s nuanced freedom within civil order (Pius IX, 1864). Unitatis Redintegratio promotes ecumenism to foster unity, affirming the Catholic Church as the “fullness of truth,” echoing Leo XIII’s reunion efforts (Satis Cognitum, 1896; Vatican II, 1964). Lumen Gentium’s collegiality complements papal primacy, as defined by Vatican I (Pastor Aeternus, 1870; Vatican II, 1964).

Modernism, per Pius X, denies objective truth, whereas Vatican II reaffirms revelation’s integrity (Dei Verbum, 1965; Pascendi, 1907). Marshall’s selective reading ignores the council’s universal acceptance by popes and bishops, a mark of its orthodoxy (CIC, 1983). His rejection of an ecumenical council contradicts the Church’s teaching authority, fostering dissent rather than fidelity (Ratzinger, 1987;).

4. Refuting Marshall’s Claims of Papal Illegitimacy and Heresy

Marshall’s content frequently criticizes Pope Francis, accusing him of heresy and questioning his legitimacy, particularly in discussions of Amoris Laetitia and the Amazon Synod’s “Pachamama” incident, which Marshall orchestrated by funding statue removals (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025;;). He advocates a “recognize and resist” stance, acknowledging the pope’s validity but rejecting his teachings when deemed erroneous (Infiltration, 2019;).

This position is ecclesiologically unsound. Papal legitimacy stems from canonical election, universally recognized for post-Vatican II popes, not personal orthodoxy (CIC, 1983). Vatican I defines papal infallibility as limited to ex cathedra statements, and no post-conciliar pope has issued heretical dogmas (Vatican I, 1870). Marshall’s citation of historical cases, like Honorius I, is misleading; Honorius was condemned posthumously for ambiguity, not deposed (Chapman, 1923). St. Robert Bellarmine’s view that a heretical pope loses office is a hypothesis, not doctrine, requiring formal judgment by the Church, which Marshall lacks authority to make (Bellarmine, 1610;).

Marshall’s “resist” stance risks schism, as it elevates private judgment over the Magisterium, contradicting the Church’s indefectibility (Matt. 16:18; Ratzinger, 1987). His involvement in the Pachamama incident, misrepresenting indigenous statues as idols, fueled division and prompted Vatican restrictions on the Tridentine Mass (Traditionis Custodes, 2021; Lewis, 2022;). Such actions undermine the obedience owed to the pope as supreme pastor (CIC, 1983;).

5. Refuting Marshall’s Conspiracy Theories in Infiltration

Infiltration posits that Freemasons, modernists, and communists have subverted the Church since the 19th century, orchestrating Vatican II and the Novus Ordo to destroy Catholicism (Infiltration, 2019;). Marshall links the loss of the Papal States, nouvelle théologie, and alleged papal scandals to this plot, presenting himself as exposing hidden truths (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025;).

This conspiratorial narrative lacks evidentiary rigor and contradicts Catholic principles. The loss of the Papal States, far from weakening the Church, freed it for spiritual mission, as Blessed John Henry Newman argued (Newman, 1845;). Nouvelle théologie, led by theologians like Henri de Lubac, sought ressourcement (return to Scripture and Fathers), not modernism, and was endorsed by popes like John Paul II (Ratzinger, 2000). Marshall’s accusations against Paul VI and John Paul II, including innuendos about personal conduct, lack primary sources and rely on speculative anecdotes, violating the Catholic rule of evidence (Infiltration, 2019; Lawler, 2019;).

Catholic teaching emphasizes sentire cum ecclesia, trusting the Church’s guidance by the Holy Spirit (John 16:13; CCC, 1994). Marshall’s conspiracies, likened to “Catholic Alex Jones” tactics, foster fear and distrust, undermining the Church’s indefectibility (Reddit, 2023;). His self-published work, despite endorsements like Bishop Athanasius Schneider’s, has been criticized for lacking academic rigor and promoting a “tired traditionalist narrative” (Lawler, 2019;;).

6. Marshall’s Impact: Fostering Division Over Unity

Marshall’s rhetoric, characterized by clickbait titles and alarmist content, stirs resentment and anxiety among viewers, as noted by Catholic commentators (Novus Ordo Watch, 2025; Reddit, 2023;). His YouTube channel, with nearly 300,000 subscribers, amplifies divisive issues, such as the Pachamama incident, which he misrepresented to incite outrage (Dr. Taylor Marshall, 2020;;). This approach, described as “uncharitable” and “condescending,” alienates Catholics and fuels schismatic tendencies, as evidenced by sedevacantist followers in his comment sections (Reddit, 2023;;).

Catholic teaching prioritizes unity under the Magisterium (John 17:21; Lumen Gentium, 1964). Marshall’s public resistance to Pope Francis, including accusations of heresy, contradicts the obedience owed to the Vicar of Christ, risking formal schism (CIC, 1983; Armstrong, 2019;;). His monetization of controversy, through self-published books and Patreon, raises ethical concerns about exploiting faithful anxieties for profit (Reddit, 2023;;). While Marshall has aided some conversions, his overall impact sows division, contrary to the Church’s mission (Reddit, 2023;;).

7. Alignment with Catholic Teaching: The Church’s Authority and Indefectibility

Authentic Catholic teaching rests on the Magisterium’s authority, guided by the Holy Spirit to preserve truth (CCC, 1994). The Novus Ordo, Vatican II, and post-conciliar popes are integral to this living tradition, as affirmed by their universal acceptance (CIC, 1983). Marshall’s rejection of these elements contradicts the Church’s indefectibility, promised by Christ (Matt. 16:18). His reliance on private judgment mirrors Protestant sola scriptura, as critics note his “rebellious spirit” from his Episcopal past (Reddit, 2024;;).

The Church has weathered crises, from Arianism to the Avignon Papacy, without losing its divine mission (Ratzinger, 1987). Marshall’s conspiracies, lacking credible evidence, dismiss this resilience, promoting a narrative of despair over hope (Infiltration, 2019; Lawler, 2019;). Catholic apologists like Trent Horn and Jimmy Akin, who defend Vatican II and the Novus Ordo with charity, exemplify fidelity to the Magisterium, contrasting Marshall’s divisive approach (Reddit, 2021;).

8. Conclusion: A Call to Catholic Fidelity

Taylor R. Marshall’s content, while appealing to traditionalist concerns, misaligns with Catholic teaching through its rejection of the Novus Ordo, Vatican II, and papal authority, and its promotion of conspiratorial narratives. His critiques lack theological and historical grounding, fostering division and risking schism, contrary to the Church’s call for unity and obedience. The Novus Ordo and Vatican II are legitimate expressions of the Church’s tradition, and post-conciliar popes exercise divinely ordained authority. Catholics are urged to trust the Magisterium, engage with balanced apologists, and reject divisive rhetoric, embracing the Church’s indefectible mission to proclaim Christ’s truth.

References
Armstrong, D. (2019). Dialogue on My Criticism of Reactionary Taylor Marshall. Patheos. Bugnini, A. (1990). The Reform of the Liturgy (1948–1975). Liturgical Press.
Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC). (1994). Vatican.
Chapman, J. (1923). The Condemnation of Pope Honorius. Catholic Encyclopedia.
Code of Canon Law (CIC). (1983). Vatican.
Dr. Taylor Marshall. (2020). Catholic Connect. Dr. Taylor Marshall. (2022). YouTube. Fiedrowicz, M. (2000). The Traditional Mass: History, Form, and Theology. Angelico Press.
Fortescue, A. (1912). The Mass: A Study of the Roman Liturgy. Longmans.
General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM). (2002). USCCB.
Infiltration. (2019). Goodreads. Jungmann, J. A. (1948). The Mass of the Roman Rite. Benziger.
Lawler, P. (2019). Infiltration: An Idiot’s Guide to the Problems of the Church. Catholic Culture. Lewis, M. (2022). Taylor Marshall, Traditionalist Scapegoat?. Where Peter Is. Murray, J. C. (1966). The Problem of Religious Freedom. Newman Press.
Newman, J. H. (1845). An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. Longmans.
Novus Ordo Watch. (2025). Articles. Peters, E. (2019). Quo Primum: Disciplinary, Not Dogmatic. Catholic Answers. Pius IX. (1864). Syllabus of Errors. Vatican.
Pius X. (1907). Pascendi Dominici Gregis. Vatican.
Ratzinger, J. (2000). The Spirit of the Liturgy. Ignatius Press.
Reddit. (2021). Opinions on Dr. Taylor Marshall. Reddit. (2023). Opinions on Taylor Marshall. Reddit. (2024). I Consider Myself Traditional. Sacrosanctum Concilium. (1963). Vatican II.
Tanner, N. P. (1990). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Sheed & Ward.
Unitatis Redintegratio. (1964). Vatican II.
Vatican I. (1870). Pastor Aeternus. Vatican.
Vatican II. (1965a). Dignitatis Humanae. Vatican.
Vatican II. (1965b). Dei Verbum. Vatican.

---