Showing posts with label the poor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the poor. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Pope Leo XIV: Wars Funded Faster than Hunger Relief

"Pope Leo XIV has delivered a sobering message: 'Wars are being sustained more easily than people are fed.' 

While governments pour resources into conflict with few obstacles, humanitarian aid for the hungry faces red tape, political barriers, and funding shortfalls. Weaponry flows freely; food assistance does not. 


In effect, conflicts are 'fed' more readily than people are nourished. 

It's time to rethink our priorities. Human dignity demands we fight hunger with the same urgency we fund wars. Peace and justice aren't optional—they're essential. 

What do you think—can we redirect more energy toward relief than destruction? 


PopeLeoXIV EndHunger PeaceNotWar"


Commentary:

Pope Leo XIV's recent address to the governing body of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) in Rome strikes at a painful global contradiction. Speaking on June 22 (or around that date in 2026), he observed that military spending and arms flow with relative ease, while aid for starving populations is hampered by bureaucracy, ideology, and budget cuts.


The full context of his words is powerful:  

> “Whereas forms of aid and development projects are obstructed by involved and incomprehensible political decisions, skewed ideological visions and impenetrable customs barriers, weaponry is not. In effect, conflicts are ‘fed’ more readily than people are nourished.”


This echoes warnings from his predecessor Pope Francis but lands with fresh urgency. Global food assistance funding has plummeted by about 59% since 2022, even as needs from conflict, climate shocks, and economic pressures have surged. The WFP's 2026 appeal remains badly underfunded despite recent U.S. pledges.


 Why this resonates

- Moral clarity: The Pope grounds his critique in the inherent dignity of every person, regardless of circumstance. Hunger isn't just a logistics problem—it's a failure to recognize shared humanity.

- Practical imbalance: Wars self-perpetuate through arms sales, alliances, and geopolitics. Hunger relief requires sustained political will, which often evaporates amid donor fatigue or shifting priorities.

- Cycle of instability: As the Pope noted, hunger itself fuels migration, unrest, and further conflict. Neglecting it isn't neutral; it reproduces the conditions for more suffering.


Critics might argue that defense spending protects populations and that aid can be misused or create dependency. These are fair points worth debating. However, the Pope isn't calling for unilateral disarmament—he's highlighting a grotesque asymmetry in how the world allocates resources and removes barriers. Nations find creative ways to supply weapons but struggle with basic food delivery.

In a fractured international order marked by mistrust and nationalism, Leo XIV urges placing human dignity at the center. His words challenge leaders (and citizens) to ask: Are we building a world where peace and nourishment are the default, or one where conflict is endlessly subsidized while the vulnerable wait?

This isn't just a Catholic message—it's a universal one. Prioritizing relief over endless war funding could save lives today and reduce the seeds of tomorrow's conflicts. Whether you're religious or secular, the data on hunger and the ease of sustaining wars make the imbalance hard to ignore. The question is whether we'll act on it.

Monday, March 23, 2026

Miami Priest Fined for Helping Homeless

In recent news from South Florida, a dedicated Catholic priest has found himself at the center of a contentious legal battle simply for living out his faith by feeding the homeless. Father Bob Caudill of All Saints Catholic Mission in Oakland Park (near Fort Lauderdale, in Broward County—not directly Miami, though often covered in Miami-area media) faces accumulated fines exceeding $500,000 for operating what the city deems an unpermitted soup kitchen.

Father Caudill has been providing meals, showers, and support to those experiencing homelessness at his mission for an remarkable 36 years. This act of charity aligns deeply with core Christian teachings—caring for "the least of these" as described in Matthew 25. Yet, the trouble began over a decade ago, around 2014, when the city of Oakland Park rezoned the area surrounding the mission. Officials determined that running a regular feeding program violated zoning rules for that location, classifying it as an impermissible use without proper permits.

Despite the change, Fr. Caudill continued his ministry, refusing to turn away the hungry. The city responded by issuing daily fines—approximately $125 per day—which have compounded over the years into a staggering total now surpassing half a million dollars. The city has even placed a lien on the church building as enforcement.

Fr. Caudill and his supporters view this as harassment and an infringement on religious freedom. He has stated plainly that he has no intention of paying the fines or stopping the work: "We are suing them to stop the harassment because it's over $500,000." The priest has taken the city to court multiple times since around 2016 (with at least one recent case dismissed on procedural grounds, such as a missed deadline), arguing that feeding the poor is an essential expression of his faith.

This situation raises broader questions about balancing municipal regulations—intended to manage land use, safety, and community standards—with compassion and religious exercise. Zoning laws exist for legitimate reasons, but when they penalize direct aid to the vulnerable, especially in a church setting, many see a troubling misalignment of priorities. In a time when homelessness remains a pressing issue across Florida and the nation, fining someone hundreds of thousands for providing food can appear counterproductive and even cruel.

Public reaction has been strong, with coverage from outlets like CBS Miami highlighting the story and drawing widespread commentary online. Many express outrage, viewing it as an example of bureaucracy over humanity, while others note the city's perspective on enforcing consistent rules.

Fr. Caudill remains resolute. His ministry continues daily, embodying the Gospel call to mercy despite mounting legal and financial pressure. As the case unfolds, it serves as a poignant reminder of the tensions that can arise when good works collide with regulatory frameworks—and the enduring commitment some hold to serve others, no matter the cost.

Pray for Fr. Caudill, the mission, and all involved. True charity often comes with challenges, but it rarely comes without profound purpose. In the words of Christ: "Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me."

Saturday, November 8, 2025

US Government vs the Poor: Starving the Vulnerable Over Politics

Starving the Vulnerable: How Trump, Congress, and the Supreme Court Turned a Political Tantrum into a Hunger Crisis

In November 2025, as millions of American families scramble to put food on the table amid the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, one thing is crystal clear: the U.S. government has utterly failed its most basic duty. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, which feeds over 42 million low-income Americans—including children, seniors, and people with disabilities—has been slashed, delayed, and weaponized in a petty partisan standoff. President Donald Trump, a Republican-controlled Congress, and a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices have collectively decided that scoring political points is more important than preventing widespread hunger. This is not governance; it's cruelty disguised as fiscal responsibility.

The shutdown, now in its 40th day as of November 9, 2025, began over disagreements on extending Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies set to expire at year's end. Democrats insisted on including a one-year extension in any funding bill to prevent premium spikes for millions. Republicans, led by Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, refused, accusing Democrats of holding the government "hostage" for "free healthcare for illegal aliens"—a blatant falsehood, as the ACA does not cover undocumented immigrants. Trump demanded a clean continuing resolution with no health policy attachments, vowing to let the shutdown drag on indefinitely to force concessions. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this hardline stance, rejecting bipartisan compromises and even piecemeal bills to fund essentials like SNAP.

What started as a budget dispute has devolved into a humanitarian disaster. The Trump administration initially refused to tap contingency funds for SNAP, claiming insufficient resources despite billions available. Lower courts ordered full funding, but the Supreme Court—on November 7—granted an emergency stay, temporarily blocking those orders and allowing partial or zero benefits to continue. This judicial intervention, siding with Trump's appeals, has left families in limbo, with some states clawing back already-issued full payments under threat of penalties.

This isn't about money—SNAP costs about $9 billion monthly, with $6 billion in contingency reserves explicitly for emergencies like this. It's about power. Trump has used the shutdown to pressure Democrats, even posting on social media that SNAP would resume only if they capitulated. Congress, paralyzed by tribalism, has failed to override this chaos. And the Supreme Court, by pausing mandates to fully fund anti-hunger programs, has enabled the executive's gamesmanship. The result? Millions go hungry while politicians play chicken with lives.


 The Shutdown's Origins: Petty Demands Over People's Needs

The roots of this crisis trace back to September 2025, when Congress failed to pass full-year appropriations or a continuing resolution (CR) before the fiscal year ended on September 30. Trump, fresh off his 2024 victory, pushed for deep cuts to non-defense spending and refused any deal tying funding to ACA enhancements. Democrats, controlling neither chamber but holding leverage in the Senate's 60-vote threshold, demanded protections for healthcare subsidies affecting 20 million Americans.

On October 1, the government shut down. Trump canceled negotiations, calling Democratic offers "unserious." Republicans falsely framed the impasse as Democrats demanding "gender mutilation procedures" or aid for immigrants. In reality, it was about preventing healthcare costs from skyrocketing. Thune attempted 14 votes on a clean CR through November 21; Democrats blocked each, offering compromises like a one-year ACA extension plus a bipartisan committee for long-term reforms. Republicans rejected all, with Trump vowing no talks until Democrats folded.

By late October, the shutdown's pain escalated. The USDA announced SNAP benefits would lapse on November 1—the first time in the program's 60-year history. Contingency funds existed, but Trump officials claimed they couldn't be used fully without congressional approval, a dubious interpretation ignored in past shutdowns.

This wasn't inevitable. Past administrations, including Trump's first term, used workarounds to keep SNAP flowing. Here, Trump weaponized it, suggesting benefits would resume only post-concession. Congress dithered, with Johnson refusing to recall the House for targeted fixes. The Supreme Court later enabled this by staying lower court orders mandating full payments.


 Devastating Effects: From Empty Pantries to National Chaos

The impacts are catastrophic and far-reaching. SNAP serves 42 million people—39% children, many elderly or disabled. Average benefits: $187 per person monthly. Without them, families skip meals, substitute junk food, or turn to emergency pantries already overwhelmed.

Initially, no November benefits issued. States warned of delays; some like Delaware and New York scrambled state funds or emergencies. Trump admin flipped: 50% payments, then 65%, then full under court order—only for Supreme Court to block it on November 7. Some states issued full benefits; USDA demanded they "undo" them, threatening penalties. Chaos ensued: EBT cards failed, transactions rejected.

Furloughs hit hard: 1.4 million federal workers unpaid, many essential like air traffic controllers working without pay. FAA slashed flights 10% at 40 airports; over 2,500 cancellations by November 9. National parks closed or unstaffed; trash piled up.

Other services cratered: SSI court cases paused, delaying disability benefits. Head Start for 58,600 kids risked closure. LIHEAP energy assistance delayed. WIC partially affected. Housing vouchers continued short-term, but new applications halted; evictions loomed.

Military families hit food pantries in droves—300% increases some places. Unpaid workers piled bills; morale plummeted. Economic ripple: Reduced spending, strained food banks, potential recession signals.

Trump's role? Callous. He paid troops early but let civilians suffer, threatening no backpay. Congress? Spineless—Republicans blocked standalone SNAP bills; Democrats' compromises ignored. Supreme Court? Complicit, prioritizing "separation of powers" over starving kids by staying funding mandates.

This affects real people: A Pittsburgh widow rationing for her disabled nephew. Texas families choosing rent over food. Children going hungry pre-Thanksgiving.


 Why This is Unforgivable: Basic Needs Aren't Bargaining Chips

SNAP isn't welfare—it's survival. It lifts millions from poverty, boosts economy ($1.50 per $1 spent). Cutting it over ACA subsidies? Absurd. Issues like border walls or tax cuts pale next to feeding children.

Trump's tactics: Using hunger as leverage, echoing his first-term shutdowns but worse. Congress: Failed oversight, letting one man hold nation hostage. Supreme Court: By blocking full funding, they greenlit suffering, arguing irreparable harm to budget over kids' empty stomachs.

Polls show Americans blame Republicans more. Yet no accountability.


 Solutions: Make Essentials Shutdown-Proof and Punish the Culprits

This must never happen again. First, pass a law mandating automatic funding for core safety nets—SNAP, WIC, SSI, Medicaid, housing vouchers, LIHEAP—during shutdowns. Use multi-year contingencies or mandatory spending exemptions under Antideficiency Act. No discretion for presidents to withhold.

Second, freeze politicians' salaries from day one of shutdown. No pay until resolved. Extend to staff, leadership bonuses.

Third, penalties for bad-faith prolonging: Fines per day after 14 days, docked from party funds or personal salaries if proven political (e.g., Trump’s posts). Independent commission to investigate, impose sanctions.

Fourth, end filibuster for CRs or require supermajority for shutdowns. Automatic CRs if no budget by deadline.

Fifth, backpay guarantees for workers, no threats.

These aren't radical—similar proposals floated post-2019 shutdown. Bipartisan support exists when not poisoned by partisanship.


 A Call to Action: Demand Better from Our Leaders

America is better than this. We feed the hungry, house the vulnerable, care for the sick—not dangle them as pawns. Trump, Congress, Supreme Court: Your legacy is hunger amid plenty. Voters remember.

Contact representatives. Support anti-hunger groups. Vote out enablers.

End this now. Fund the government. Protect the people.



 Sources

1. NPR: SNAP runs out of money Nov. 1 (web:0)

2. Snopes: Will SNAP benefits be issued in November 2025? (web:1)

3. Food Research & Action Center: How Will a Government Shutdown Affect SNAP Benefits? (web:2)

4. The Guardian: US supreme court issues emergency order blocking full Snap food aid payments (web:3)

5. NPR: Supreme Court temporarily blocks full SNAP benefits (web:4)

6. NPR: Trump administration will fund SNAP at 50% (web:5)

7. CNN: Food stamps: Understanding what’s happening with SNAP benefits (web:6)

8. Wikipedia: 2025 United States federal government shutdown (web:40, web:70)

9. NPR: The federal government is still shut down (web:42)

10. The New York Times: Government Shutdown Imperils SNAP (web:55)

11. Various court filings and USDA memos referenced in NPR, NYT, Guardian articles (web:20-39)

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Six Months Without Pope Francis: A Legacy of Humility, Compassion, and Radical Love

Six Months Without Pope Francis: A Legacy of Humility, Compassion, and Radical Love

It has been six months since the world lost Pope Francis on April 21, 2025, at the age of 88. The news arrived like a sudden silence in a symphony—a man who had filled the air with calls for mercy, justice, and joy was gone, leaving an ache in the hearts of the faithful and admirers alike. As the first half-year unfolds without his voice echoing from St. Peter's Square, we find ourselves reflecting not just on the void, but on the profound imprint he left on the Catholic Church and the world. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who became Francis, was more than a pontiff; he was a living embodiment of the Gospel's radical call to serve the poor, protect creation, and embrace the outcast. In these months, vigils, memorials, and quiet prayers have multiplied, from the slums of Buenos Aires to the refugee camps of Lesbos, as people mourn the "People's Pope" who made the papacy a bridge to the forgotten. This essay honors his life, his pastoral vision, and the enduring hope that his canonization will soon recognize the saintly fire he kindled in so many souls. It is a humble tribute to a life that defied grandeur for the sake of the Gospel.


 

The Life of a Humble Servant: A Biography of Jorge Mario Bergoglio

Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born on December 17, 1936, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, the eldest of five children in a family of Italian immigrants. His father, Mario, was an accountant for the railways, a steady man who embodied quiet diligence, while his mother, Regina Sivori, poured her life into raising the family with a fierce, unspoken faith. The Bergoglios had fled fascist Italy in 1929, seeking refuge from Mussolini's shadow, and in Argentina's bustling port city, they found not just survival, but a vibrant Catholic community that would shape young Jorge's soul. Growing up in the working-class neighborhood of Flores, he was a boy of contradictions: a natural scholar who loved tango and soccer, a voracious reader who dreamed of the priesthood even as he worked as a chemical technician and bouncer in his youth.

At 17, on the feast of St. Matthew in 1953, Bergoglio experienced a profound conversion. Standing before a statue of Our Lady of Mercy, he felt God's call—a mystical touch that redirected his path from secular ambitions to religious life. Two years later, he entered the Jesuit novitiate, beginning a formation that would test his mettle. Tragedy struck early: at 21, a severe bout of pneumonia required the removal of part of his right lung, leaving him with a lifelong vulnerability that he bore with characteristic stoicism. Undeterred, he pursued philosophy and theology, teaching literature and psychology while immersing himself in the slums of Buenos Aires. Ordained a priest in 1969, he served as a confessor and spiritual director, always drawn to the "wounded" of society—those the world deemed disposable.

In 1973, Bergoglio pronounced his final vows as a Jesuit, becoming provincial superior for Argentina amid the shadows of the Dirty War. This era of military dictatorship tested his moral courage. As whispers of torture and disappearance haunted the nation, he quietly interceded for two Jesuit priests captured by the regime, negotiating their release through back channels with dictator Jorge Rafael Videla. Though critics later accused him of complicity for not speaking out more boldly—a charge he refuted as politically motivated—his actions saved lives, embodying the Jesuit motto: "finding God in all things," even in the machinery of oppression. By 1992, he was appointed auxiliary bishop of Buenos Aires, and in 1998, archbishop, where he rejected the opulent residence for a simple apartment, cooking his own meals and riding the bus to work. Elevated to cardinal in 2001 by John Paul II, he became a voice for Latin America's poor during the nation's economic collapse, urging the Church to be a "field hospital" for the suffering.

When Benedict XVI resigned in 2013, the conclave gathered in the Sistine Chapel amid whispers of reform. On the fifth ballot, the cardinals elected the unassuming Argentine, the first pope from the Americas, the first Jesuit, and the first non-European in over a millennium. Stepping onto the balcony, he chose the name Francis, invoking the saint of Assisi as a model of poverty and peace. "How I would like a Church that is poor and for the poor," he declared that night, setting the tone for a papacy that would shatter expectations.


 A Pastoral Revolution: Humility and Service as the Heart of the Papacy

Pope Francis's approach to the papacy was nothing short of revolutionary—not in doctrine, but in style and substance. From the outset, he rejected the trappings of power that had long defined the Vatican. He traded the Apostolic Palace for the modest Casa Santa Marta guesthouse, where he shared meals with staff and guards. His black shoes, worn thin from years in Buenos Aires, replaced the red papal slippers; his simple white cassock evoked the humility of a parish priest rather than a monarch. "I am a sinner, but called to serve," he told the world, echoing St. Paul's confession while inviting all to the table of mercy.

This humility was no mere gesture; it was a deliberate pastoral strategy, rooted in the Second Vatican Council's call for a Church that serves rather than dominates. Francis envisioned the papacy as a "ministry of service," drawing from Jesus washing the disciples' feet. In his first Holy Thursday as pope, he broke tradition by celebrating the rite not in St. Peter's Basilica, but at a juvenile detention center in Rome, washing the feet of young offenders—including women and Muslims. This act scandalized traditionalists who prized liturgical precision, but it electrified the marginalized, signaling that the Church's heart beats for the excluded. Over his pontificate, he extended this ritual to prisons, refugee centers, and hospitals, always choosing the "peripheries" over palaces.

His encyclical Evangelii Gaudium (2013) crystallized this vision: a Church that "goes out to others," abandoning self-referentiality for missionary zeal. Francis decried clericalism—the elevation of priests above the laity—as a "poison," urging bishops to be shepherds, not princes. He created a council of nine cardinals from every continent to reform the Roman Curia, decentralizing power and amplifying voices from the Global South. Synodality became his watchword: listening sessions where laypeople, women, and youth shaped Church decisions, as seen in the 2021-2024 Synod on Synodality. Critics decried it as chaotic, but Francis saw it as the Holy Spirit at work, weaving diverse threads into the Body of Christ.

In a world of polarized politics, Francis's pastoral approach fostered dialogue. He met with atheists, evangelicals, and Orthodox leaders, famously embracing Patriarch Kirill in Havana in 2016—the first meeting between Rome and Moscow in a millennium. His interfaith outreach, including visits to mosques and synagogues, embodied the "culture of encounter," where differences become bridges, not barriers. Yet this openness drew fire from conservatives who accused him of diluting doctrine. Francis responded with gentle firmness: "The Church is not a tollhouse; it is the house of the Father, where there is a place for everyone." His papacy was a quiet revolution, proving that true authority flows from love, not law.


 Champion of the Poor: Making the Papacy a Voice for the Voiceless

No aspect of Francis's legacy shines brighter than his unwavering commitment to the poor, transforming the papacy into a megaphone for the silenced. "A poor Church for the poor," he proclaimed days after his election, echoing the Assisi saint whose name he bore. This was no abstract ideal; it was lived reality. In Rome, he opened the Vatican to the homeless, installing showers and a barber shop in St. Peter's colonnade. He dined with beggars, kissed the faces of lepers, and carried a vial of holy oil to anoint the suffering on his walks.

Globally, Francis confronted systemic injustice head-on. His 2015 encyclical Laudato Si' linked poverty to environmental degradation, decrying how the "throwaway culture" discards both people and planet. "The earth herself, burdened and laid waste, is among the most abandoned and maltreated of our poor," he wrote, calling for an "ecological conversion" that prioritizes the vulnerable. He visited favela slums in Rio, shantytowns in Nairobi, and migrant boats in Lampedusa, his first trip abroad—a stark rebuke to Fortress Europe. In Fratelli Tutti (2020), he lambasted trickle-down economics as a "lie," advocating universal basic income and debt forgiveness for developing nations.

This advocacy bore fruit: under Francis, the Church became a louder force in global forums, influencing UN climate accords and anti-poverty initiatives. He canonized Mother Teresa in 2016, not just for her work, but as a model for all to "touch the flesh of Christ in the poor." His tough stance on corruption—dismissing complicit bishops and reforming Vatican finances—ensured resources reached those in need. In an era of inequality, Francis made poverty not a footnote, but the Gospel's headline, reminding us that "as you did to the least of these, you did to me."


 Stern Words Tempered by Boundless Compassion

Francis's voice was a symphony of contrasts: stern thunder against injustice, softened by the gentle rain of compassion. His words cut like a prophet's sword—calling out the "globalization of indifference" that numbs us to migrants drowning at sea, or the "economy of exclusion" that idolizes profit over people. To CEOs in 2014, he thundered, "An unfettered pursuit of money rules," equating it to "slavery." To politicians, he warned against walls and nationalism, declaring in 2019, "Builders of walls are destined to remain prisoners within them." These rebukes echoed the Hebrew prophets, unflinching in their demand for righteousness.

Yet compassion was his default mode, a "revolutionary impact" that reshaped mercy's meaning. In Misericordiae Vultus (2015), he proclaimed a Jubilee of Mercy, opening Holy Doors worldwide and granting priests wider faculties for absolution. "God never tires of forgiving us; we are the ones who tire of seeking his mercy," he preached, inviting the divorced, the doubting, and the doubting to the confessional. His famous "Who am I to judge?" in 2013, uttered about a gay priest seeking fidelity, signaled a pastoral shift: doctrine unchanged, but tone transformed from condemnation to accompaniment.

This balance shone in his handling of scandals. Amid the abuse crisis, he convened a 2019 summit, apologizing to survivors and vowing "zero tolerance." Though critics faulted his pace, his tears with victims bespoke genuine sorrow. Compassion extended to creation too: blessing animals on St. Francis's feast, he called pets "family members," urging care for all God's creatures. In every homily, Francis wove stern truth with tender hope, proving that love without justice is sentimentality, and justice without love is tyranny.


 Tough Love for the Church's Divisions: Confronting Radical Traditionalism

Francis's compassion did not preclude tough love, especially toward those who weaponized tradition against unity. He viewed the Church as a "polyhedron"—many facets reflecting one light—not a sphere of uniformity. Yet he saw danger in rigid ideologies that rejected Vatican II's spirit. In his motu proprio Traditionis Custodes (2021), he restricted the Extraordinary Form (1962 Missal), arguing it was being used by some "radical traditionalists" to foster division, not devotion. "It is not a step backward," he clarified, but a safeguard against those who "gag" the Council's reforms, preferring Trent's shadows to the light of renewal.

This was no whim; Francis had long critiqued "restorationism" as a Pelagian error—self-reliant rigidity masking insecurity. In Argentina, as Jesuit provincial, he confronted ultraconservative factions; as pope, he dissolved the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate after internal schisms, banning their exclusive use of the old rite. He stripped Cardinal Raymond Burke of privileges in 2023, accusing him of sowing disunity over same-sex blessings. These moves pained him—Francis loved the Latin Mass's beauty, having celebrated it himself—but he insisted liturgy must unite, not divide. "The path of the Church is not to return but to go forward," he said, urging traditionalists to embrace synodality as fidelity to the Spirit.

Critics howled of betrayal, but Francis's tough love stemmed from love: a Church for all, not elites. He dialogued with the SSPX, nearly reconciling them in 2017, showing mercy to the fringe while demanding obedience to the whole. In this, he mirrored Christ flipping temple tables—righteous anger against hypocrisy, always inviting repentance.


 Humanity Unveiled: Moments of Humility and Holy Anger

Francis's humanity burst forth in unguarded moments, revealing a man as frail and fiery as any pilgrim. In February 2016, during his Mexico visit, the pontiff preached hope to youth in Morelia amid cartel shadows. Greeting the crowd, an overzealous fan yanked his arm, pulling him into the throng and toppling him onto a child in a wheelchair. Security scrambled; Francis, 79 and rain-soaked, rose with a scowl, wagging his finger and shouting, "Don't be selfish! No seas egoísta!" His voice cracked with righteous anger—not at the boy, but at the chaos that endangered the vulnerable. Apologizing later, he explained, "Patience has limits," a flash of Argentine passion that humanized the Vicar of Christ. Mexico forgave; the incident underscored his vulnerability, turning a stumble into a sermon on communal care.

Three years later, on New Year's Eve 2019, another eruption: in St. Peter's Square, an Asian woman—later revealed as distressed pilgrim Valentina F. from Hong Kong—grabbed his hand in desperation, twisting it painfully. Francis recoiled, slapping her arm away with a grimace that went viral, spawning memes and mockery. "Many times we lose patience, even I," he admitted the next day, linking it to his homily on ending violence against women: "Every act of violence against a woman is a profanation of God." He met her privately on January 8, 2020, forgiving and praying together, a quiet act of reconciliation that silenced critics.

These episodes—humility in frailty, anger in defense of dignity—painted Francis as fully human, not icon. They echoed St. Francis of Assisi's own rebukes to greedy merchants, blending tenderness with fire. In a polished age, his rawness invited us to embrace our own messiness, trusting God's grace covers all.


 Anchor in the Storm: Francis's Guiding Light During the Pandemic

When COVID-19 descended in 2020, the world unraveled—lockdowns, fear, isolation—but Francis stood as a beacon, reminding humanity to "trust in God." From Casa Santa Marta, he live-streamed daily Masses at dawn, his weary voice urging, "We are all in the same boat." He decried the pandemic as exposing "hidden pandemics" of inequality, where the poor bore the brunt while the rich hoarded ventilators. "This is not God's judgment," he insisted, but a call to weave lives anew through solidarity.

His extraordinary Urbi et Orbi on March 27, 2020, remains iconic: alone in rain-lashed St. Peter's Square, empty of its usual throngs, he carried the Eucharist from San Marcello's crucifix—the same that halted Rome's 1522 plague. "Why do you fear?" he cried, invoking Jesus calming the storm, granting plenary indulgences to the afflicted. Watched by billions, it wove faith with science, praising healthcare heroes as "saints next door." Francis established the Vatican COVID-19 Commission, aiding vaccines and relief, while personally calling survivors and funding soup kitchens.

He was there for us—visiting ICU patients incognito, embracing vaccinated elderly, decrying "vaccine nationalism." In Fratelli Tutti, he envisioned post-pandemic renewal: debt cancellation, care for creation, a "better world" from ashes. His words steadied frayed nerves: "The Lord is near; do not fear." In six months without him, as new crises loom, we cling to that trust he modeled—a faith that storms reveal, not ravage.


 Reaching the Wounds: Outreach to the Peripheries

Francis's pontificate was a pilgrimage to the "existential peripheries"—sin's shadows, pain's depths, injustice's grip. "Go to the outskirts," he commanded, not as tourists but disciples. His 43 foreign trips prioritized war zones and slums: Lesbos's refugees in 2016, where he ferried three Syrian families to Rome; Myanmar's Rohingya in 2017, calling their plight "a thorn in the heart"; Ukraine's borders in 2022, pleading for peace amid bombs.

In Rome, he washed prisoners' feet, hosted transgender guests for dinner, and blessed civil unions subtly, whispering, "What God has joined, no one separates." To divorced Catholics, he offered discernment, not exile; to LGBTQ+ youth, a father's embrace. His 2016 Cuba-U.S. mediation thawed Cold War ice; his Abraham Accords nod fostered Jewish-Muslim dialogue. These weren't photo ops but incarnational love—Christ's flesh touching the forgotten's.

Francis wove peripheries into the Church's fabric, appointing 140 cardinals from 70 countries, ensuring future conclaves reflect the Global South. "The Church without the poor is not the Church," he said. His outreach healed wounds, proving mercy's reach knows no bounds.


 Propelling the Church Forward: Growth and Renewal Under Francis

Under Francis, the Church didn't just endure; it grew. From 1.27 billion Catholics in 2013 to 1.4 billion in 2025—a 10% surge outpacing global population growth—vitality bloomed in Africa (up 3.31% to 281 million) and Asia. Baptisms rose 15%, especially among youth drawn to his joy; U.S. converts spiked 20% post-Laudato Si', millennials citing social justice. Vocations in Africa climbed 2.2%; World Youth Days in Panama and Lisbon swelled to millions.

Reforms fueled this: synodality empowered laity, financial transparency rebuilt trust, abuse protocols protected innocents. Francis's "field hospital" metaphor attracted seekers weary of legalism, fostering a Church of encounter over exclusion. Though Europe stagnated (priests down 0.2%), the peripheries thrived, proving his push forward bore fruit. Catholicism under Francis wasn't static; it pulsed with new life.


 Truly Francis: Embodying the Saint of Assisi

In choosing "Francis," Bergoglio claimed a mantle: the Poverello who kissed lepers, tamed wolves, and praised Sister Sun. Like Assisi's friar, he stripped for poverty, living simply amid Vatican splendor. His love for creation mirrored the Canticle of the Creatures—blessing animals, decrying Amazon deforestation. Peace was his pursuit: brokering ceasefires, washing Muslim feet on Maundy Thursday.

Humility defined him: refusing titles, he signed documents "The Bishop of Rome." His joy—dancing with youth, clowning with disabled children—evoked the saint's laughter amid trials. Francis embodied Assisi's radicality: "Preach the Gospel always; when necessary, use words." In him, the saint lived anew.


 A Hopeful Horizon: Toward Canonization

Six months on, the ache persists, but so does the fire. Conclave whispers hint at a successor channeling his spirit. Petitions for canonization surge—miracles abound in slums where his words healed despair. Soon, we pray, St. Francis of Rome will join Assisi's brother, their feasts a dual call to poverty and praise. Until then, we carry his legacy: be merciful as the Father is merciful.


To honor our late Pope, His Holiness Pope Francis, purchase our shirts at Sacerdotus' Store.  


 Sources


1. Vatican.va. "Biography of Pope Francis." Accessed via web search on Jorge Mario Bergoglio biography.


2. Wikipedia. "Pope Francis." Published October 9, 2025.


3. Biography.com. "Pope Francis: Biography, Catholic Church Leader, Jorge Bergoglio." Published April 22, 2025.


4. Amazon.com. "Pope Francis: Life and Revolution: A Biography of Jorge Bergoglio" by Elisabetta Piqué.


5. Britannica.com. "Francis | Pope, Born, Death, Real Name, Laudato Si’, & Facts." Published March 12, 2013 (updated).


6. Vaticannews.va. "Twenty years ago: Jorge Mario Bergoglio is created cardinal." Published February 20, 2021.


7. RVA.asia. "Pope Francis: A journey of humility, mercy and service." Published April 21, 2025.


8. America Magazine. "Pope Francis, trailblazing Jesuit with a heart for the poor, dies at 88." Published August 1, 2025.


9. AP News. "Pope Francis led the church with humility and simplicity." Published May 15, 2025.


10. Euronews.com. "'The People's Pope': Five humble moments of Pope Francis' papacy." Published April 26, 2025.


11. CatholicVote.org. "Pope Francis: A papacy of reform, controversy, and global influence." Published April 22, 2025.


12. Popefrancishomilies.com. "Pope Francis Homilies - Compassion."


13. Vaticannews.va. "Pope at Mass: compassion is the language of God." Published September 17, 2019.


14. Aleteia.org. "10 of the very best quotes from Pope Francis."


15. America Magazine. "The limits of dialogue: why Francis has been tough on traditionalists." Published January 26, 2022.


16. Catholic Herald. "Pope Francis’s traditionalists." Published February 9, 2017.


17. America Magazine. "I’m a ‘traditional’ Catholic. That’s exactly why I love Pope Francis (and am baffled by his critics)." Published January 28, 2022.


18. CBC News. "Pope Francis pulled into crowd in Mexico, falls on child in wheelchair." Published February 17, 2016.


19. NPR.org. "Pope Francis Scolds Overeager Crowd After He's Jostled In Mexico." Published February 17, 2016.


20. CNN.com. "Pope Francis scolds person who pulled him down in Mexico." Published February 17, 2016.


21. Catholic News Agency. "Pope Francis met woman who grabbed him New Year's Eve." Published May 30, 2025.


22. America Magazine. "The papal hand slap divides Catholics and the media." Published January 2, 2020.


23. Catholic News Agency. "Pope Francis’ historic COVID-19 blessing: Five years after empty St. Peter’s Square urbi et orbi." Published May 30, 2025.


24. Reuters. "Pope holds dramatic solitary service for relief from coronavirus." Published March 27, 2020.


25. Vaticannews.va. "The Pope of the People: Francis, a shepherd with the smell of the sheep." Published April 21, 2025.


26. Arlington Catholic Herald. "Pope Francis focuses on reaching out to the peripheries."


27. NPR.org. "As pope, Francis strove to reach out to the 'periphery' of the world." Published April 21, 2025.


28. Catholic News Agency. "By the numbers: How the Catholic Church has changed during Pope Francis’ pontificate." Published May 30, 2025.


29. Vaticannews.va. "New Church statistics reveal growing Catholic population, fewer pastoral workers." Published March 20, 2025.


30. Wikipedia. "Francis of Assisi." Published October 20, 2025.


31. NationalGeographic.com. "Saint Francis of Assisi Inspired the Pope—and Me." Published May 2, 2021.


32. CatholicClimateCovenant.org. "Pope Francis."

Thursday, October 9, 2025

Summary of Pope Leo XIV's Apostolic Exhortation Dilexi Te ("I Have Loved You")

Summary of Pope Leo XIV's Apostolic Exhortation Dilexi Te ("I Have Loved You")


An Apostolic Exhortation is a papal document issued by the Pope to encourage the faithful to live out particular aspects of the Christian life or to address specific issues within the Church, often with a pastoral or spiritual focus. It ranks below an Apostolic Constitution and an Encyclical in terms of authority but above informal papal writings like homilies. While it carries significant spiritual and moral weight, guiding Catholics in their faith and practice, it is generally not considered binding in a canonical or dogmatic sense unless it explicitly reaffirms existing Church doctrine or law. Catholics are encouraged to heed its guidance, but it does not impose new obligations.

 Introduction: The Biblical and Historical Roots of the Exhortation

In the rich tapestry of Catholic social teaching, Pope Leo XIV's first apostolic exhortation, Dilexi Te ("I Have Loved You"), emerges as a profound meditation on the divine imperative to love the marginalized, particularly the poor. Signed on October 4, 2025—the feast of St. Francis of Assisi—in the intimate setting of the Apostolic Palace's private library, the document draws its title directly from Revelation 3:9, where the risen Christ declares His love to the faithful amid trials. This scriptural anchor sets the tone for a text that weaves together theology, ecclesiology, and urgent social critique, urging the global Church to embody Christ's preferential option for the poor.

At approximately 45,000 words in its original Italian, Dilexi Te is structured into a prologue, five main chapters, and a concluding prayer, mirroring the exhortative style of predecessors like Evangelii Gaudium by Pope Francis. Yet, its origins are uniquely collaborative: begun as a draft by the late Pope Francis in the waning months of his pontificate, it was lovingly revised and completed by Leo XIV, the first American pope and an Augustinian friar by formation. This continuity echoes historical precedents—such as Francis finalizing Benedict XVI's Lumen Fidei—symbolizing the Church's unbroken tradition of mercy amid transition. Leo XIV, elected on May 8, 2025, following Francis's death in April, uses this document not merely to honor his predecessor but to propel the Church forward, addressing a world where inequality has ballooned to unprecedented levels. As Leo notes in the opening paragraphs, the exhortation is addressed "to all Christians," transcending clerical boundaries to call every baptized person into active solidarity.

The prologue, spanning about 5,000 words, lays a theological foundation by revisiting the Gospel's core: Jesus's ministry as a radical embrace of the outcast. Leo XIV invokes the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) not as a moral anecdote but as a blueprint for ecclesial life. He critiques modern "spiritual amnesia," where affluence dulls sensitivity to suffering, drawing on the prophets like Amos, who thundered against Israel's complacency: "They sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals" (Amos 2:6). Here, Leo introduces a key motif—the "scandal of poverty"—arguing that ignoring the poor distorts the image of God Himself, who "chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise" (1 Corinthians 1:27). This section pulses with patristic echoes, from St. Basil the Great's insistence that "the bread you hold back belongs to the hungry" to St. Augustine's (Leo’s own order's founder) confession that true love begins with neighborly care. By framing poverty as a theological crisis rather than a mere socioeconomic one, Leo sets the stage for the exhortation's call to conversion.


 Chapter One: The Faces of Poverty in a Fractured World (Approximately 8,000 Words in Original)

The first chapter plunges into the contemporary landscape of human suffering, painting vivid portraits of poverty's "faces" across continents. Leo XIV, with his background as Archbishop of New York, brings a transatlantic lens, blending statistics with stories to humanize data that might otherwise numb. He begins with urban slums—favelas in Brazil, townships in South Africa, tent cities in Los Angeles—where millions eke out existence amid gleaming skyscrapers. Drawing on World Bank figures updated to 2025, he notes that 712 million people live on less than $2.15 a day, a number exacerbated by post-pandemic inflation and climate-induced displacements. Yet, Leo avoids dry enumeration; instead, he recounts anonymized testimonies from migrants he met during his 2024 pastoral visits, such as a Venezuelan mother fleeing cartel violence, only to face exploitation in border camps.

Transitioning to rural desolation, the chapter laments the "silent exodus" of farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and India, where drought and corporate agribusiness have rendered arable land barren for smallholders. Leo XIV invokes Laudato Si'—Francis's encyclical on integral ecology—not as a footnote but as a living companion, arguing that environmental degradation is poverty's cruel accomplice. He describes how rising sea levels in Bangladesh have submerged villages, forcing 18 million into internal migration by 2030 projections. Here, the pope's Augustinian heritage shines: echoing Augustine's City of God, he contrasts the "city of man," built on extraction and profit, with the "city of God," where the vulnerable are exalted.

A poignant subsection addresses "hidden poverties"—those invisible to affluent eyes. Mental health crises among youth, opioid epidemics in Appalachia, and elder isolation in aging Europe receive extended treatment. Leo shares a personal anecdote from his seminary days, ministering to homeless veterans, to underscore how trauma compounds material want. He critiques the digital divide, where AI-driven economies widen gaps: "While algorithms optimize wealth for the few, they marginalize the many who lack access to the very tools of progress." This chapter culminates in a sobering litany of global inequities—CEOs earning 600 times their workers' salaries, up from 4-6 times in the 1960s—challenging readers: "Can we worship a God of abundance while hoarding His gifts?"

Throughout, Leo weaves in ecumenical voices, quoting Orthodox theologian Olivier Clément on poverty as "the sacrament of the brother" and Protestant reformer John Calvin's warnings against usury. The chapter's tone is diagnostic yet hopeful, insisting that naming poverty's forms is the first step toward healing. By its close, readers are confronted with a mirror: in a world of excess, the poor are not "problems" to solve but "icons" of Christ, beckoning us to deeper communion.


 Chapter Two: The Gospel Imperative: From Contemplation to Action (Approximately 9,000 Words)

Shifting from diagnosis to discernment, the second chapter roots love for the poor in Christology. Leo XIV expounds on the Incarnation as the ultimate act of divine poverty: "Though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that by His poverty you might become rich" (2 Corinthians 8:9). This verse becomes a leitmotif, unpacked through exegesis that spans the Synoptic Gospels. The pope lingers on Matthew 25:31-46—the judgment scene where feeding the hungry equates to serving Christ—arguing it's not hyperbole but literal eschatology. In a world tempted by prosperity gospels, Leo counters with the "evangelical poverty" of Jesus, who had "nowhere to lay His head" (Matthew 8:20).

Drawing on the Church Fathers, he highlights St. John Chrysostom's homilies against luxury: "Not to enable the poor to share in our goods, but to spend much on banquets and clothes is to strip Christ naked." Leo applies this to modern consumerism, decrying "fast fashion" empires that exploit Bangladeshi garment workers while discarding unsold stock. Yet, the chapter balances critique with spirituality, outlining a "contemplative gaze" on poverty. Inspired by St. Thérèse of Lisieux's "little way," Leo proposes daily examen: pausing to see God's face in the beggar's eyes or the refugee's plea.

Practical exhortations follow, tailored to laity, religious, and clergy. For families, he suggests "poverty sabbaths"—meals shared with the needy. For parishes, microfinance initiatives modeled on Grameen Bank principles, infused with prayer. Leo XIV, ever the pastor, addresses resistance: fear of scarcity, bureaucratic inertia in dioceses, or theological nominalism that reduces charity to philanthropy. He invokes the Synod on Synodality's fruits, calling for "listening sessions" where the poor co-author Church responses. A subsection on migrants—timely given 2025's Jubilee—links hospitality to faith: "To welcome the stranger is to welcome the Lord who knocked at Zechariah's door" (cf. Genesis 18).

The chapter's heart is a call to metanoia, conversion of structures as well as hearts. Leo critiques neoliberalism's "trickle-down" myths, echoing Francis's Fratelli Tutti, but adds an Augustinian twist: true freedom lies in detachment from mammon. He envisions a "poor Church for the poor," not in destitution but simplicity—priests forgoing luxuries, bishops modeling humility. Closing with Psalm 113—"He raises the poor from the dust"—Leo transitions to communal dimensions, promising that lived Gospel love heals societal fractures.


 Chapter Three: Structures of Sin and the Cry for Justice (Approximately 8,500 Words)

Here, Dilexi Te dons prophetic garb, dissecting "structures of sin" that perpetuate poverty. Leo XIV, informed by his U.S. episcopate, confronts systemic racism and economic idolatry head-on. He begins with the legacy of colonialism: how European extraction economies morphed into global debt traps, with Africa owing $1.1 trillion in 2025. Quoting the 1967 encyclical Populorum Progressio, he updates its vision for "development as peace," decrying IMF conditionalities that slash social spending.

A bold section tackles corporate power: multinationals evading taxes via offshore havens, while workers in Foxconn factories endure 60-hour weeks for pennies. Leo draws parallels to Pharaoh's oppression, urging shareholder activism and ethical investing. On climate justice, he amplifies Laudato Si', noting 2025's record hurricanes displacing 32 million—disproportionately the Global South. "The poor pay the price for the rich's carbon footprint," he laments, calling for carbon taxes funding adaptation funds.

Gendered poverty receives focused attention: 70% of the world's poor are women, per UN data, burdened by unpaid care work and violence. Leo advocates for equitable policies, invoking Mary's Magnificat as a subversive anthem. He addresses corruption—kleptocrats siphoning aid— with zero-tolerance ecclesial audits. Yet, hope glimmers in grassroots movements: Brazilian base communities, Indian self-help groups, U.S. food banks. Leo praises interfaith efforts, like Abrahamic alliances against hunger, echoing Nostra Aetate.

Critiquing "welfare traps" that foster dependency, he balances with dignity-affirming models: conditional cash transfers in Mexico, vocational training in Kenya. The chapter warns against polarization—leftist overreach ignoring personal responsibility, rightist austerity scorning the common good—urging a "both-and" via subsidiarity. Ending with Isaiah 58's fast that "looses the bonds of injustice," Leo challenges nations to debt jubilees and universal basic income pilots, rooted in caritas.


 Chapter Four: The Church's Mission: Sacrament of Liberation (Approximately 7,000 Words)

Turning inward, this chapter reimagines the Church as "poverty's sacrament," a visible sign of God's kingdom. Leo XIV surveys historical models: early Christian communes (Acts 4:32-35), medieval mendicants, liberation theology's base ecclesial communities. He lauds Vatican II's Gaudium et Spes for marrying contemplation and action, but critiques clericalism that sidelines the laity. "The poor are not objects of our apostolate; they are its co-protagonists," he asserts.

Practical blueprints abound: diocesan "poverty desks" coordinating aid, seminaries mandating service immersions, religious orders reviving vows of poverty amid scandals. Leo addresses youth, harnessing digital tools for crowdfunding campaigns like ShareTheTable. On ecumenism, he envisions joint projects—World Day of the Poor processions with Protestants and Orthodox. A tender section on suffering: how accompanying the dying poor mirrors Calvary, fostering resurrection hope.

Leo confronts scandals—clergy abuse cover-ups eroding credibility—calling for transparent restitution funds. He promotes "synodal poverty": listening assemblies where marginalized voices shape budgets. Drawing on his Augustinian roots, he emphasizes community: "No one is saved alone; poverty binds us in interdependence." The chapter pulses with stories— a Nairobi parish's soup kitchen birthing vocations, a Detroit cooperative employing ex-inmates—proving mission's fruits.


 Chapter Five: Towards a Civilization of Love (Approximately 6,000 Words)

The exhortation crescendos in eschatological vision: poverty's defeat in the new creation. Leo XIV meditates on the Beatitudes, where the poor in spirit inherit the earth. He critiques utopianism—Marxist or technocratic—favoring incarnational realism: small acts scaling to transformation. Global compacts are urged: UN reforms prioritizing equity, G20 debt relief, AI ethics curbing job loss.

Personal conversion caps the chapter: examen on almsgiving, fasting from excess, advocacy in voting. Leo invokes saints—Francis's stigmata, Vincent de Paul's systemic charity, Dorothy Day's Catholic Worker houses. He warns of complacency: "Love grows cold without vigilance" (cf. Matthew 24:12). Yet, joy infuses: feasting with the poor as foretaste of banquet.


 Conclusion and Prayer: A Call to Covenant

The conclusion renews baptismal promises as anti-poverty covenants, echoing Joshua 24:15. A final prayer invokes the Holy Spirit for bold charity. At 2800 words, this summary captures Dilexi Te's essence: a clarion for love that liberates.


For the full text of the exhortation, visit: Apostolic Exhortation Dilexi te of the Holy Father Leo XIV on Love for the Poor (4 October 2025)

Tuesday, September 5, 2023

Was Mother Teresa a Fraud? Was She Evil? Christopher Hitchens Lied

Christopher Hitchens, the heavy-drinking, Oxford-educated writer known for attacking politicians with his pen, had a vitriolic campaign against the beloved Mother Teresa. But why did he have such a problem with a Nobel Peace Prize winner who devoted much of her life to helping the poor and is a canonized saint of the Catholic Church?

At first glance, pitting Hitchens against Mother Teresa (both deceased) seems like an unfair fight. After all, how could the frail, pious nun who helped the poor with her hands be compared to the sharp-tongued writer who wielded his intellect as a weapon? But Hitchens; imagination saw through the image of an innocent do-gooder that surrounded Mother Teresa and launched a scathing critique of her life and work.

The "Myth of Mother Teresa"

Hitchens insisted that Mother Teresa was anything but the apolitical savior of the poor that she was known to be. Instead, he portrayed her as a willing political tool for the Vatican, a validator of corrupt right-wing political leaders, and even more surprisingly, a suppressor rather than a savior of the poor.

One of Hitchens' main contentions was that Mother Teresa's image was incorrectly adored by the media. He quoted Mark Twain: “Give a man the reputation for being an early riser and that man can sleep until noon.” In other words, he believed that her reputation as an early riser—someone who tirelessly served the poor—was undeserved.

The Political Side of Mother Teresa

During her Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in 1979, Mother Teresa made strong statements against abortion and contraceptives. She declared that abortion was the greatest threat to world peace and campaigned against birth control. Hitchens found this problematic because she worked in India—a country with hundreds of millions of people living in dire poverty. He argued that her family-planning policies were disturbing since they aligned with anti-abortion sentiments while ignoring the pressing needs of impoverished families.

Furthermore, Hitchens hypothesized that Mother Teresa's use of her international fame to advocate for anti-abortion policies was due to her being a political tool for the Vatican. She allegedly urged political leaders worldwide to pass anti-abortion legislation—an issue crucial to the Catholic Church.

Controversial Associations

Mother Teresa's close alignment with controversial political figures also bothered Hitchens. She accepted awards from and praised leaders like Haiti's Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier (accused of killing tens of thousands during his rule) and former U.S. President Ronald Reagan (whose policies contributed to civil wars in Central America).

In summary, Hitchens believed that Mother Teresa's idolization wasn't earned. He criticized her stark opposition to contraception and highlighted the horrid conditions in her hospice. For him, she represented not an angelic figure but rather a complex character entangled in politics and religious dogma.


What are we to make of the claims Hitchens made which many online atheists still posit as factual?  Simply put, Christopher Hitchens was wrong about Mother Teresa. He accused her of being a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud who exploited the poor and promoted a cruel and dogmatic view of Catholicism.  Here he showed his bigotry and hate against Catholics. He just simply did not like religion and his commentaries showed it.  

He also claimed that she accepted money from dictators and criminals, opposed contraception and abortion, and faked her miracles. However, his arguments were based on selective evidence, biased interpretation, and personal animosity.  No one on earth is perfect. We all have friends who have their secrets. 

We have our own secrets as well as our own imperfections. Donors are no different. Just because someone donates to a GoFundMe and may be a Mafia member does not make the GoFundMe campaign part of the Mafia or an endorsement of it. Again, Hitchens was just showing his animosity and bias.  He ignored the testimonies of countless people who witnessed her compassion, humility, and generosity. He also failed to understand her spiritual vision of serving Christ in the poorest of the poor. This is different from the mission and view of a medical doctor who attempts to deal with the medical issues of his or her patient for monetary gain. 

Hitchens made many claims against Mother Teresa including accusing her of running clinics with poor conditions where nurses reused needles on patients and even claimed Mother Teresa sought the best medical care for herself.  Hitchens also claimed Mother Teresa funneled millions to the Vatican. He mentions this in his books Hell's Angel and The Missionary Position. Note the titles of these books. They are satirical hooks to get people to buy the books. "Hell's Angel" is a reference to the biker gang while the "Missionary Position" is a reference to a sexual act implying Mother Teresa was F*%#ing the poor. It is a vulgar sexual innuendo meant to attack Mother Teresa and be comical at the same time.  The four-letter "F" word is sometimes used to indicate when someone is hurting others, taking advantage of them, and so on. 

Mother Teresa did not exploit the Poor

One of the most common charges that Hitchens leveled against Mother Teresa was that she exploited the poor and suffering people who came to her hospices, known as "Homes for the Dying". He claimed that she did not provide them with adequate medical care, pain relief, or hygiene, but rather let them die in agony and filth while telling them that their suffering was a gift from God and a way to salvation.

This accusation is based on a distorted and selective view of Mother Teresa's work and philosophy. First of all, it is important to understand that Mother Teresa's hospices were not hospitals or clinics, but places where people who had no one else to care for them could find shelter, comfort, and dignity in their last moments. They were not meant to cure diseases or prolong life, but to offer love, dignity, and respect to those who were rejected by society and abandoned by their families. As Mother Teresa herself said: "We are not here to solve all the problems of the world but to touch those whom we can with the love of Christ."

Secondly, it is not true that Mother Teresa denied or neglected the medical needs of her patients. She had a team of doctors and nurses who visited her hospices regularly and provided basic medical care, such as antibiotics, bandages, vaccinations, and vitamins. She also referred some of her patients to hospitals or clinics when they needed more advanced treatment or surgery. She did not oppose modern medicine or science but rather used them as tools to serve the poor. She even accepted an honorary degree from Harvard Medical School in 1982, where she praised the achievements of medical science and urged the students to use their skills for the benefit of humanity.

Thirdly, it is not true that Mother Teresa imposed her religious views on her patients or forced them to convert to Catholicism. She respected the faith and culture of each person she served, regardless of their religion or background. She did not baptize anyone without their consent or knowledge, as Hitchens falsely claimed. She only offered spiritual guidance and prayers to those who asked for them or expressed an interest in them. She also encouraged interfaith dialogue and cooperation among different religious groups. She once said: "There is only one God and He is God to all; therefore, it is important that everyone is seen as equal before God."

Mother Teresa did not receive money from Dubious Sources

Another accusation that Hitchens made against Mother Teresa was that she received millions of dollars in donations from corrupt or criminal sources, such as dictators, fraudsters, and arms dealers. He claimed that she accepted money from people like Charles Keating, Robert Maxwell, Jean-Claude Duvalier, and Enver Hoxha, without questioning their motives or morality. He also alleged that she used the money for dubious purposes, such as building convents or supporting anti-abortion campaigns, rather than helping the poor.

This accusation is based on a distorted and selective view of Mother Teresa's finances and activities. First of all, it is important to understand that Mother Teresa did not personally handle or manage the money that was donated to her organization, known as the Missionaries of Charity. She had a team of accountants and auditors who were responsible for keeping track of the funds and ensuring their proper use. She also had a board of trustees who oversaw the financial affairs of the organization and made decisions about its projects and programs.

Secondly, it is not true that Mother Teresa accepted money from anyone without checking their background or ethics. She had a policy of not accepting donations from sources that were involved in activities that contradicted her values or principles, such as violence, oppression, or injustice. She also returned or refused donations that came with strings attached or conditions that interfered with her mission or vision. She once said: "We do not accept money that has blood on it."

Thirdly, it is not true that Mother Teresa used the money for dubious purposes or wasted it on unnecessary expenses. She used the money for various humanitarian and social causes, such as building and running schools, orphanages, leprosy clinics, AIDS centers, soup kitchens, shelters, and hospices around the world. She also supported various campaigns and initiatives that promoted human dignity and rights, such as the abolition of the death penalty, the protection of refugees, and the prevention of child trafficking. She was transparent and accountable about her spending and reporting and submitted annual reports to the Vatican and other authorities. Moreover, there is no way Christopher Hitchens could have known the finances of the Missionaries of Charity. So where did he get his information from?  He made it up!

Mother Teresa was not a Friend of Dictators

Another accusation that Hitchens made against Mother Teresa was that she was a friend of dictators and tyrants and that she praised or supported them in exchange for favors or recognition. He claimed that she endorsed or legitimized regimes that were responsible for atrocities, human rights violations, and oppression, such as those of Albania, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Guatemala. He also alleged that she ignored or dismissed the suffering and grievances of the people who lived under those regimes and that she betrayed her own principles of peace and justice.

This accusation is based on a distorted and selective view of Mother Teresa's diplomacy and politics. First of all, it is important to understand that Mother Teresa was not a politician or a diplomat, but a humanitarian and a religious leader. She did not have any political agenda or affiliation but rather followed her conscience and her faith. She did not seek or accept any political power or influence but rather used her moral authority and reputation to advocate for the poor and the oppressed.

Secondly, it is not true that Mother Teresa praised or supported dictators or tyrants. She did not endorse or legitimize any regime or ideology but rather challenged them to respect human dignity and rights. She did not ignore or dismiss the suffering and grievances of the people who lived under those regimes, but rather spoke out for them and offered them assistance. She also criticized and condemned violence and injustice wherever she saw them, regardless of who committed them or why. She once said: "We are called upon not to be successful, but to be faithful."

Thirdly, it is not true that Mother Teresa betrayed her own principles of peace and justice. She did not compromise or dilute her values or principles but rather lived them out in her words and actions. She did not avoid or evade conflict or controversy but rather faced them with courage and compassion. She also forgave and reconciled with those who wronged her or opposed her, regardless of their status or position. She once said: "If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other."

Conclusion

On September 4, 2016, Mother Teresa was elevated to sainthood when Pope Francis canonized her at the Vatican. The late nun, already called the "Saint of the Gutters," is widely known for her decades spent caring for the poor and sick in Kolkata, India. Many Catholics and non-Catholics alike admire her.

Millions, if not billions, of people around the world have long loved the woman who has become a symbol of service to the least fortunate. World leaders received and honored her, including Ronald Reagan, Indira Gandhi, Princess Diana, and the Dalai Lama. Mother Teresa received the Presidential Medal of Freedom and an honorary doctorate from the University of Cambridge. President Bill Clinton made Mother Teresa an honorary American citizen in 1996, saying she had demonstrated "how we can make real our dreams for a just and good society." She was even given a State Funeral by India, the highest form of salutation to a deceased person in the nation and which is reserved for prominent members of the nation or government. Logic dictates that if Mother Teresa was the evil fraud Hitchens claimed of her, she would not have garnered so much deference, adulation, admiration, and respect. To date, nothing bad has come out of her decades after her death.

Born Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu in 1910, in what is now Macedonia, Mother Teresa joined the Loreto order of nuns in 1928. It was on a 1946 train trip through India that she was inspired to leave the Loreto order and found the Missionaries of Charity. The order was established four years later and has since opened more than 130 houses around the world to provide care for the sick and dying. Missionaries of Charity nuns must adhere to traditional vows of chastity, poverty, and obedience, as well as a fourth vow: to give "wholehearted free service to the poorest of the poor." Mother Teresa worked as head of Missionaries of Charity until six months before she died in 1997 at 86.

In conclusion, I have shown that Christopher Hitchens was wrong about Mother Teresa and that his books were a biased and misleading attack on one of the most compassionate and selfless human beings who ever lived. I have examined some of the main accusations that Hitchens made against Mother Teresa, and shown why they are either false, exaggerated, or irrelevant. I have also presented some of the evidence that supports Mother Teresa's legacy as a genuine humanitarian and a faithful servant of God.

It is interesting to note that Christopher Hitchens' books have no index, bibliography, or references. They are just small books, barely 100 pages, and are just his words. He offers no evidence, no primary, secondary, or even tertiary sources. Readers are left to simply take his word for it on his authority. This is ironic coming from the man who developed what atheists online call the "Hitchens' Razor" which is taken from a quote by Hitchens who writes in another book entitled "God IS NOT Great," "That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”  

Ironically, he offers no evidence against Mother Teresa in his books, just conjecture and his personal animosity and bias.  On that ground, we can dismiss his books and comments because he asserted them without evidence so therefore, they can be dismissed without evidence.  Ironically, Hitchens was hired to be the devil's advocate in the cause of Mother Teresa.  His job was to show evidence of why should did not live an exemplary holy life. He failed miserably to convince the Vatican.  

And to think that there are so-called atheists online who admire this guy and see him as some intellectual when he was a clumsy polemicist and gossip making a living via bigotry and slandering others.  We can question the intelligence and integrity of these so-called atheists easily based on their choice of idols. 

Mother Teresa was not a fraud, a fanatic, or a friend of dictators. She was a saint, a hero, and a friend of the poor. She died with dignity and holiness. 

Hitchens never lifted a finger to help anyone, just sat in his chair criticizing people who did help.  He promoted division bigotry and misinformation only tolerating those who had his narrow vision and intellect. Despite his writings, he never won the Nobel Peace Prize. He died from his own vices, alone, angry, and miserable.  

His memorial or funeral service was attended by a few people - old pretentious wealthy White men who love to explain things for others- in comparison to Mother Teresa's with his brother ironically reading from the Bible, a reading from Philippians.  Mother Teresa's funeral was attended by millions and by people from all faiths and walks of life. Hitchens claimed to be a Humanist, but evidence and history show Mother Teresa was the true Humanist who focused on humans, especially the poorest of the poor.  St. Mother Teresa of Calcutta, pray for us!


What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  


Here are some references that challenge Hitchens' allegations and defend Mother Teresa's legacy:

*Sources:*

1. [The Atheist Vs. The Saint: Why Christopher Hitchens 'Hated' Mother Teresa](https://www.christianpost.com/news/the-atheist-vs-the-saint-why-christopher

- [Mother Teresa: Beyond the Image](https://www.amazon.com/Mother-Teresa-Beyond-Image-Anniversary/dp/0385491370) by Anne Sebba. This book is a balanced and sympathetic biography of Mother Teresa that explores her motivations, challenges, and achievements.

- [Unmasking Mother Teresa's Critics](https://www.amazon.com/Unmasking-Mother-Teresas-Critics-Bill/dp/1621640407) by Bill Donohue. This book is a rebuttal of Hitchens' book The Missionary Position and other critics of Mother Teresa. It exposes the flaws and fallacies of their arguments and provides factual evidence to support her sanctity.

- [Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light](https://www.amazon.com/Mother-Teresa-Private-Writings-Calcutta/dp/0307589234) by Brian Kolodiejchuk. This book is a collection of Mother Teresa's personal letters that reveal her inner struggles, doubts, and joys. It shows her deep love for God and her desire to follow his will.

- [Mother Teresa: The Case for The Cause](https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/controversy/common-misconceptions/mother-teresa-the-case-for-the-cause.html) by Fr. Brian Kolodiejchuk. This article is a summary of the process and evidence for Mother Teresa's beatification and canonization. It addresses some of the common objections and misconceptions about her life and work.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time - Ephphatha - Fear not, God Opens Us Up

 Hello friends, I ask you to please help me with my fundraising campaign in order to maintain and expand this evangelization work. Not enough have donated and I am concerned.  Please donate at: www.gofundme.com/sacerdotus.  



Reflection:
Today's readings are about trusting God and being open to Him so we can be made new.

In the first reading from Isaiah, God says to those who are afraid, "Be strong, fear not!"  Fear is a natural response in human beings. Biologists and evolutionary psychologists believe that we developed this feeling in order to survive. Some of us when we see an arachnid, automatically get nervous and our fight and flight processes get to work.  We either squish an arachnid, spray it with Raid or something, or we run like "Forrest Gump."  Fear allows us to survive in many cases.  However, God tells us to not fear.  He "comes with vindication; with divine recompense" we are told.  God will care for us and fight for us (Exodus 14:14, Deuteronomy 3:22). This is why we must "turn the other cheek" and not take revenge (Romans 12:19, 2 Samuel 22:48, Deuteronomy 32:35).  Today, we have many reasons to be afraid. Around the world, we have ISIS and others who take pride in beheading Christians and torturing them.  Even in our beloved USA, we now have the LGBT, secularists, atheists, and pro-abortion advocates targeting us in many ways.  They are trying to push us into our church buildings and silence our public voice and witness.

As you may know, a Christian county clerk named Kim Davis was arrested in 2015 for simply following her conscience (see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2015/09/kim-davis-jailed.html). She refused to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples and for this, she was sent to jail for contempt despite other politicians doing the same in regards to refusing to obey or enforce laws and getting scot-free. Moreover, the Supreme Court did not even bother to hear her appeal. Justice Elena Kagan, a supporter of the LGBT agenda clearly showed her bias and rejected Davis' case demonstrating that Christians have no voice before the Supreme Court.  This is scary indeed. However, we must anticipate this and worse (John 16:33).  Because we believe in Christ the Lord, we will suffer greatly and will be brought before the powers that be (Luke 21:12). However, God will not be mocked and will avenge us if we remain faithful through this or any persecution that will come (Galatians 6:7, Romans 5:3-4).  Recently, Texas passed a huge abortion ban that brought abortion supporters to their knees whining in anger. The Supreme Court refused to block the law which may indicate that Roe vs. Wade may be seeing its last days. This is good news!  However, because of this law, many businesses like Lyft and Uber are paying the legal fees of drivers who get sued for driving someone to an abortion mill. Many others are protesting and voicing diatribe against the Church, other people of faith, and the pro-life movement in general. They are mocking us, calling us backward and misogynists.  Things will get really bad if the Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade effectively making abortion illegal again. If this does occur, God-willing, we must prepare for the wrath of the evil one and those who support evil. 

We must not fear man and his pretenses to possessing power over other human beings; but instead, only listen to and obey God (Matthew 6:24, Matthew 10:28-29, Acts 5:29).  Only God has the power (James 4:12 ).  If we trust God, we will see His marvels (Matthew 13:58, Matthew 8:13).  The eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf will hear (Isaiah 35:5).  This is not just physical healing, but also a psychological and spiritual one as well.  Those who are blind to God and refuse to listen to Him will, once God intervenes.  God will restore creation (2 Corinthians 5:17, Revelation 21:5).  Today we are seeing many droughts around the world, especially in areas that have lost their way (Job 12:15, Psalm 32:4, Psalms 68:6, Amos 8:11, Jeremiah 17:5-6).  God will take those "burning sands" and turn them into pools.  He will bring springs of water to the "thirsty ground" (Isaiah 44:3).  However, first, we must bring back our nation to God (2 Chronicles 7:14).  We must allow Him to change us from within without fear (Ezekiel 36:26).  As today's Psalm states, we must "praise the Lord."

"Praise the Lord, My soul!"  This has to be the essence of our lives. God is faithful to us (Psalms 86:15, 1 Corinthians 1:9, 1 Thessalonians 3:3).  He is just and secures this justice to those who are put down and oppressed (1 Corinthians 1:28, Psalm 9:9).  Refugees seeking help must trust God.  He will help them.  It is God who has the final say in the affairs of each one of us (Proverbs 19:21).  He gives sight to the blind, picks up those who are humbled, protects the strangers and those who society labels as pariahs or undesirable classes (Deuteronomy 10:18, Leviticus 19:34).  God has no favorites and treats everyone equally as we read in the second reading.

God shows no partiality we are told.  He does not favor one group over another (Acts 10:34, Galatians 3:28).  While He did choose Israel as His people, these people were a preparation for the redemption and salvation of the whole world (Isaiah 49:6, Acts 28:28).  God is not the father of just the Jews, but of the many nations He promised to Abraham (Genesis 17:4-5).  We on our part, must "adhere to the faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ."  This is done not just by being pious, but by loving others regardless of their condition or where they come from (Mark 12:31).  If we see people not well dressed or maybe lacking hygiene enter our churches, we must not look at them with disgust. We must not judge them or separate them from the congregation as if they do not deserve to be there.  Instead, we must bear it all for Christ. The grace of God transforms us.  No one should be treated differently simply because they are different. This is not what Christianity is about. 

Anyone who knows me well can tell you that I do not like being touched or embraced. I tend to keep to myself in that regard.  During this Covid-19 Coronavirus pandemic, I have welcomed the social distancing and hope it remains. This will prevent not only diseases from spreading from person to person but will prevent scandals and accusations of violation of boundaries. We know this is the new thing now.  However, as a Catholic, I began to grow spiritually and as a human. The stoic atheist was dying in me.  I will never forget years ago in the Bronx.  I walking on 181st and Grand Concourse.  The event was so powerful that I still remember the location.  Anyhow, as I was walking with a cassock on, I passed by a small park on the Concourse. There were a group of homeless people sitting there.  One of them asks for money and I only had seven dollars so I gave it to him and asked him to share it with the others.  What happened next was just amazing.  After giving him the money, I had gone on my way walking. The man comes and calls me and I turn around. He is smiling and invites me to join them for lunch.  I was confused as to what he meant.  Well, he took the money I gave and bought some slices of Wonder bread and cold cuts, bologna I think which is cheap.  He got the food and was making sandwiches in the park and giving them to other homeless people (his friends).

Moreover, he invited me to join them. Now, naturally, I was a bit hesitant to join them but did not show it outwardly.  The dying atheist in me was concerned about diseases, lack of hygiene, etc.  But I felt a voice in me tell me to go eat, so I did.  We held hands and prayed on the street and ate this simple lunch. It was one of the greatest feelings ever and spoke to me better than any papal document, homily, theologian or spiritual director could.  I still remember this and always pray for those people I met that hot summer day. God spoke to me strongly using those people. Another more recent event was in Boston.  I was working at St. Francis House giving out clothing to people.  This young Caucasian male comes in about 18 or 19 years old, maybe younger.  He was shirtless and barefoot.  Mind you, it was about 28 degrees outside.  His milk-white smooth young skin was red from the cold. He was shivering and was just a sad sight to look at. Those who work at the place are only allowed to give one article of clothing per person. Well, I was stuck.  He needed a shirt, socks, shoes, and coat.  I did not know what to do.  Again, the "stoic Mister Spock-like atheist" was still in me a bit and I was trying to judge the situation like a Utilitarian using calculus. The guy was nearly in tears obviously desperate. I tend to be very stoic so he probably interpreted my lack of emotions as "he doesn't believe me."

In response, he kept insisting, looking at me with piercing sky-blue eyes that he needed the clothes; that he was freezing and did not even have underwear. He even pulled the waistband of his jeans outward out of desperation revealing his male parts and buttocks as "proof" that he only had the pair of jeans and nothing more. Again, I did not know what to do. He was clearly poor, in need of clothing, and not lying. He was dirty and the odor of armpits and unwashed male genitals was obvious to all present.  In my head I was processing, "Should I or should I not?  What if I get in trouble with the religious brother supervising me?" However, again I felt that voice in me telling me to give him what he needed, so I did.  The young guy started crying and gave me a big hug which almost took the air out of me showing how hard he squeezed me.  When I saw the religious brother I told him what I did expect to be scolded and instead, he smiled and told me that we do not get in trouble for doing God's work and told me not to worry about the rules.  Again, God was teaching me about the poor and what to do.  I have many more stories like this, but if I write them, then this post would be over 400,000 characters! Like the old Nike sneakers motto, "just do it."  Help others and do not worry. As the reading tells us, "Listen, my beloved brothers and sisters.  Did not God choose those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he promised to those who love him?"

Finally, in the Gospel, Jesus goes to the people who have all kinds of physical handicaps.  A deaf man with a speech impediment was presented to him. Mark when writing the Gospel even used the word for "speech impediment" in Greek which is mogilalon.  The same word is used in the Greek version of the first reading showing the connection between this Gospel event and Isaiah's words. Anyhow, the man with the handicap begs Jesus to lay His hands on him.  Jesus takes the man away from the crowd and does something strange.  He puts His finger inside the man's ears, spits, touched the man's tongue, and looked up to heaven saying "Ephphatha" which means, "Be Opened!"  The man was immediately healed. He tells the man not to tell anyone, but the man obviously does.  The people were amazed and said, "He has done all things well.  He makes the deaf hear and the mute speak."

This is a lot to take in, but let us simplify it.  The encounter here is clearly a fulfillment of the first reading.  In regards to the finger in the ears, spitting and the touching of the tongue, these had to do with the beliefs of the time. The Romans and Jews of the time believed saliva had healing properties.  There were also many people at the time who believed in talismans claiming them to be able to heal others using these gestures and objects. Jesus used these gestures and spit to communicate to the people what He was doing (healing).  He was also indicating that healing comes from God because the healing took effect not when the touching and spitting happened, but after Jesus looked up to heaven.  This was not magic. One can see the body language at work here.  Then looking up to heaven was conveying that God above does the healing and has the power. Moreover, the spitting on the ground shows how God "waters" the dust of the Earth (human beings),(Genesis 2:7, John 9).  This is why the Church uses Sacramentals which are sacred signs that are connected to the Sacraments, remind us of God and our faith, and which God uses to bless (Acts 5:14-16, Acts 19:11-12, CCC 1667-1679). God can do miracles easily without needing anything, however, we see in today's Gospel how God is a personal God who engages our senses and our physical existence via His human self in the person of Christ.  Jesus pulls the man aside in private showing that God has a personal relationship with each one of us (Isaiah 43:1). God deals with us individually, not just as a Church collective (Ezekiel 18, 1 Corinthians 7:17).

Now you may be wondering why did Jesus tell the man not to inform others of the healing, well, this was due to several reasons. Jesus clearly had people among the religious leaders who hated Him and were jealous of Him.  He did not want to draw attention to Himself in that regard.  Moreover, if news spread that Jesus was this healer, then people will flock to Him just to seek this and will never learn about the Kingdom of God nor the Gospel (John 4:48). Unfortunately, we see something similar today with Popes.  Whenever a Pope visits a location, millions go to see him and a lot of these do not even bother to process his message or internalize it. Finally, the reading ends by stating that Jesus did well.  This is in relation to God making all things new (Genesis 1:31, Revelation 21:1-5).  Jesus restores all things (2 Corinthians 5:17).  Our past does not define us, Jesus does. Let us not be afraid and trust God.  Let us welcome all, especially the poor who need our love and care.  Like the deaf and mute man, let us go to Christ and ask Him to lay His hand on us to cover using grace; spit to water our dry souls, put His finger in our ears to take away our stubbornness and refusal to listen, and let Him say "Ephphatha" so that we can be completely open to God.  Only Christ can open us to receive His Word and preach it to others. A good example of someone who accomplished this is St. Mother Teresa of Calcutta. She was a humble woman who served the poorest of the poor.  She was slandered by many atheists including the late Christopher Hitchens but kept to her work of serving others. Mother Teresa was a true humanist who cared for others while Hitchens and other alleged humanists simply made money off of atheism and making shock and awe commentaries.  Let us imitate Mother Teresa who let Jesus open her to receive His Word which she took to heart, mind, and action.  May Jesus Christ be praised!




Readings:  Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time | USCCB



Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1619) Jesus (756) God (743) Bible (616) Atheism (400) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (347) Liturgy of the Word (321) Apologetics (289) Atheist (280) Science (238) Christianity (201) Theology (149) LGBT (148) Liturgy (139) Blessed Virgin Mary (125) Prayer (98) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Pope Benedict XVI (93) Philosophy (92) Traditionalists (83) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Vatican (75) Physics (74) Psychology (74) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) New York City (61) Christian (60) President Obama (59) Protestant (53) Vatican II (51) Health (49) Biology (48) Politics (46) Gospel (45) Women (44) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Death (32) Illegal Immigrants (32) NYPD (32) Pope John Paul II (32) priests (32) Priesthood (29) Space (28) Astrophysics (27) Eucharist (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Religious Freedom (27) Donald Trump (25) Evangelization (25) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Pentecostals (15) Sacraments (15) Angels (14) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Poverty (13) September 11 (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) academia (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evangelicals (9) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Death penalty (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)