Pope Leo XIV’s Return to Castel Gandolfo: A Mixed Blessing for Faith, Economy, and Tradition

Pope Leo XIV’s Return to Castel Gandolfo: A Mixed Blessing for Faith, Economy, and Tradition

On a warm July evening in 2025, Pope Leo XIV arrived at Castel Gandolfo, the papal summer residence nestled in the Alban Hills just south of Rome, marking a notable shift in Vatican tradition. This marks the first time in over a decade that a pope has utilized this historic retreat, a practice largely abandoned by Pope Francis, who preferred the simplicity of staying within the Vatican walls. The decision by Leo XIV, who ascended to the papacy in 2022, has ignited a flurry of reactions—ranging from enthusiastic support to sharp criticism. As the Church navigates a complex modern landscape, this move raises questions about rest, economic impact, vanity, and the essence of Catholic identity. This poar exploration delves into the pros and cons of returning to Castel Gandolfo, critiques the misplaced priorities of traditionalist Catholics who see it as a triumph, and reflects on its implications for a Church facing financial and spiritual challenges. A Historical Haven: The Legacy of Castel Gandolfo Castel Gandolfo’s history as a papal retreat stretches back to 1596, when Pope Clement VIII acquired the property for the Church. Perched 1,300 feet above sea level, its strategic location offered a respite from Rome’s heat and the malaria-ridden Pontine Marshes. Over centuries, popes transformed it into a luxurious enclave, complete with a palace, gardens, a private farm, and even an astronomical observatory established by Pope Gregory XIII. The Apostolic Palace, with its 135 acres of land, became a symbol of papal privilege, hosting figures like Pope Pius XI, who famously broadcast the first radio message from the Vatican in 1931, and Pope John Paul II, who recuperated there after an assassination attempt in 1981. Pope Benedict XVI was the last to use it regularly, spending summers there until 2013. Pope Francis, however, opted against it, choosing to remain in the Vatican guesthouse, Santa Marta, as a gesture of humility. His decision reflected a broader shift toward a less ostentatious papacy, aligning with his emphasis on serving the poor. The property was opened to the public as a museum in 2016, generating revenue but leaving the town of Castel Gandolfo—population 8,900—without its traditional papal draw. Leo XIV’s return, announced in May 2025, signals a return to pre-Francis norms, prompting both nostalgia and debate. The Pros: Rest, Renewal, and Economic Revival Rest for the Pontiff The most immediate benefit of Leo XIV’s decision is the opportunity for rest. At 69, the pope shoulders a grueling schedule—leading Masses, meeting world leaders, and addressing global crises like climate change and migration. Rome’s summer temperatures, often exceeding 90°F (32°C), exacerbate this burden, posing health risks. Castel Gandolfo’s cooler climate, with average July temperatures around 75°F (24°C), provides a natural retreat. Historical accounts suggest popes like Pius XII used the residence to recover from exhaustion, a precedent that supports Leo’s choice. A rested pontiff can better fulfill his spiritual and administrative duties, ensuring the Church’s leadership remains robust. Medical experts agree that regular breaks enhance cognitive function and resilience. A 2023 study from the *Journal of Occupational Health* found that leaders under chronic stress are 30% more likely to experience burnout, a risk mitigated by periodic retreats. For Leo, whose papacy has already tackled divisive issues like clergy abuse reforms, this rest could sustain his long-term effectiveness. The serene gardens and private chapel at Castel Gandolfo offer a space for prayer and reflection, aligning with the Catholic tradition of sabbath rest as a divine mandate. Tourism and Economic Boost The economic impact on Castel Gandolfo is equally significant. The town’s economy has struggled since the papal retreat ceased being a regular fixture. Local businesses—cafes, souvenir shops, and the renowned mosaic workshop—relied on the influx of pilgrims and tourists drawn by the pope’s presence. In 2012, the last full year of Benedict XVI’s use, the town saw an estimated 150,000 visitors, contributing €5 million to the local economy, according to a report by the Italian Chamber of Commerce. Since the museum opened in 2016, visitation has averaged 80,000 annually, a respectable but diminished figure. Leo XIV’s return is expected to reverse this trend. Preliminary estimates from the Castel Gandolfo Tourism Board suggest a potential 50% increase in visitors for the 2025 summer season, injecting millions into the local economy. Hotels are already reporting bookings up 30% since the announcement, and local vendors anticipate higher sales of religious artifacts and regional specialties like porchetta. This revival benefits not just merchants but also the 1,200 residents directly employed in tourism-related sectors. For a town that felt abandoned, the pope’s presence restores a sense of identity and purpose. Moreover, the revenue generated could support broader regional development. The Alban Hills, a UNESCO-designated area, could see enhanced infrastructure—better roads, public transport, and cultural preservation—funded by tourism growth. This aligns with the Church’s social teaching on supporting local communities, turning a papal retreat into a catalyst for economic justice. The Cons: Vanity, Exploitation, and Financial Strain A Display of Vanity Despite these benefits, the lavishness of Castel Gandolfo raises ethical concerns. The Apostolic Palace, with its frescoed halls, private lake, and expansive gardens, contrasts sharply with the modest lifestyle of Jesus Christ, whom popes are called to emulate. Critics argue that maintaining such a property reflects vanity, a sin the Church has historically cautioned against. Pope Francis’s decision to forgo Castel Gandolfo was seen as a powerful statement of humility, resonating with his 2013 exhortation *Evangelii Gaudium*, where he urged the Church to be “poor and for the poor.” The optics are problematic in a global context where 700 million people live on less than $2.15 a day, per World Bank data (2024). Images of Leo XIV relaxing in a palace could alienate the faithful, especially in developing nations where the Church relies on grassroots support. The property’s upkeep—estimated at €2 million annually for maintenance, staff, and utilities—further fuels the perception of extravagance, drawing resources from parishes already struggling to fund schools and charities. The Pope as a Mascot Using the pope’s presence to boost tourism risks reducing him to a celebrity or mascot, a role incompatible with his spiritual mission. The Church is not a commercial enterprise, and the pontiff’s primary duty is to shepherd souls, not to serve as a tourist attraction. Historical parallels exist—medieval popes like Leo X were criticized for their lavish courts, contributing to the Reformation. While Leo XIV’s intent may be innocent, the commodification of his image—through guided tours, merchandise, and media coverage—could undermine the sacred nature of the papacy. This concern is heightened by social media, where influencers and news outlets amplify the spectacle. A 2024 Pew Research study found that 65% of Catholics under 35 view the Church’s public image as increasingly tied to entertainment, a trend that could deepen if Castel Gandolfo becomes a recurring photo op. The risk is not just reputational but theological, diluting the pope’s role as a moral leader. Financial Strain and Potential Sale The most pressing con is financial. The Catholic Church globally faces a donation crisis, with contributions dropping 15% in Western countries since 2018, according to the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA, 2024). In the U.S. alone, dioceses reported a $1.2 billion deficit in 2023, driven by declining attendance and legal costs from abuse scandals. Maintaining Castel Gandolfo, with its high operational costs, could exacerbate this strain, especially if donations continue to wane. Speculation about selling the property has resurfaced. Pope Francis considered it in 2018, valuing the estate at €200 million, though the plan was shelved due to cultural heritage concerns. With Leo XIV’s return, the debate intensifies. Selling could fund critical initiatives—supporting refugees, rebuilding churches in war-torn regions like Ukraine, or addressing clergy shortages. Yet, the emotional attachment to Castel Gandolfo, coupled with its historical significance, complicates any decision. The financial argument is compelling: resources tied to a single retreat could be redirected to serve millions, aligning with the Church’s mission more directly. Traditionalist Reactions: A Misplaced Triumph The return to Castel Gandolfo has elicited jubilation from traditionalist Catholics, some proclaiming “we’re back” on social media platforms like X. This sentiment reflects a longing for a pre-Vatican II Church, where papal pomp and traditional practices were more prominent. For these groups, the retreat symbolizes a return to orthodoxy, a counterpoint to what they see as Francis’s progressive leanings. Yet, this enthusiasm reveals a troubling misplacement of priorities. Castel Gandolfo is not a cornerstone of Catholicism. The faith’s essence lies in the Eucharist, the Scriptures, and the teachings of Christ—not in vacation spots or ornate residences. The “we’re back” narrative suggests that a papal retreat is a litmus test for the Church’s health, a view that trivializes the deeper struggles of evangelization, moral renewal, and unity. Traditionalists’ focus on externals—liturgy, vestments, and now summer retreats—diverts attention from the Church’s mission to address modern challenges like secularism, poverty, and interfaith dialogue. Historically, the Church has thrived through adversity, not luxury. The early Christians met in catacombs, and saints like Francis of Assisi embraced poverty. The fixation on Castel Gandolfo as a victory ignores the reality that faith does not require opulence. Critics like theologian Dr. Massimo Faggioli argue that such traditionalism risks becoming a “nostalgic cult,” detached from the Gospel’s call to serve the marginalized. The “we’re back” claim, therefore, exposes a shallow understanding of Catholicism, prioritizing aesthetics over substance. Did Jesus vacation or have a palace vacation spot? Did His Disciples? Broader Implications for the Church Theological Reflections The debate over Castel Gandolfo touches on deeper theological questions about the papacy’s role. The pope is the “Servant of the Servants of God,” a title emphasizing humility over grandeur. Yet, the Church’s history includes both ascetics like Pope Celestine V and lavish patrons like Pope Julius II. Leo XIV’s choice can be seen as a balanced approach—acknowledging human needs while retaining tradition. However, it challenges the Church to articulate why such a retreat is justifiable when so many faithful lack basic necessities. Theological voices differ. Jesuit Father James Martin supports the rest argument, noting that Jesus withdrew to pray (Mark 1:35), suggesting a precedent for papal retreats. Conversely, liberation theologian Gustavo Gutiérrez might argue that the funds could better serve the poor, echoing Francis’s stance. This tension reflects the Church’s ongoing dialogue between tradition and social justice, with Castel Gandolfo as a microcosm. Contemporary Challenges The decision comes at a pivotal moment. The Church is losing members—Europe saw a 10% decline in Mass attendance from 2019 to 2024 (CARA data)—and faces financial pressures from lawsuits and declining vocations. In 2023, the Vatican reported a €50 million deficit, prompting cost-cutting measures. Against this backdrop, Castel Gandolfo’s use could be perceived as tone-deaf, especially if it diverts resources from parishes or missionary work. Yet, it also offers an opportunity. A well-rested pope could lead more effectively, and the tourism revenue could be channeled into Church projects. The key is transparency—ensuring funds benefit the faithful, not just the retreat’s upkeep. Leo XIV could set a precedent by pledging a portion of tourism proceeds to global aid, turning a potential liability into a virtue. A Path Forward Pope Leo XIV’s return to Castel Gandolfo is neither a clear victory nor a definitive misstep—it’s a complex decision with multifaceted impacts. The pros—rest for the pontiff and economic revival—are tangible and immediate, offering practical benefits. The cons—vanity, exploitation, and financial strain—pose legitimate ethical and logistical challenges that demand careful management. Traditionalists’ celebration of the move as a return to glory is misguided, reflecting poor priorities that sideline the faith’s core mission. Moving forward, the Church could mitigate criticism by modernizing the retreat’s use. This might include hosting interfaith summits or youth gatherings at Castel Gandolfo, aligning its purpose with contemporary needs. Financially, a public audit of costs and a commitment to redirect tourism revenue could address donor concerns. Spiritually, Leo XIV could use the retreat to model a balanced life—resting, praying, and serving—rather than reinforcing perceptions of privilege. Ultimately, Castel Gandolfo’s future hinges on how it serves the Church’s mission. If it becomes a tool for renewal and outreach, it could justify its existence. If it remains a symbol of past glory, it risks alienating a faithful already questioning the Church’s relevance. As of July 8, 2025, the world watches, awaiting Leo XIV’s next move in this unfolding saga.

Fifth Sunday of Easter: On The Mission

On May 18, 2025, the Fifth Sunday of Easter in Year C of the Catholic liturgical cycle, the readings offer a profound meditation on love, renewal, and the mission of the Church, themes that resonate deeply with two significant events occurring on this day: the inauguration Mass of Pope Leo XIV and the birthday of Saint John Paul II. Reflecting on these readings in light of these events provides a rich opportunity to consider the continuity of the Church’s mission and the call to embody Christ’s love in a new era.

The readings for the Fifth Sunday of Easter, as outlined in the liturgical calendar, begin with the Entrance Antiphon from Psalm 98:1-2: “O sing a new song to the Lord, for he has worked wonders; in sight of the nations he has shown his deliverance, alleluia.” This sets a tone of joy and renewal, inviting the faithful to celebrate God’s transformative power. The First Reading from Acts 14:21-27 recounts the conclusion of Paul and Barnabas’ first missionary journey. Despite facing rejection in Antioch in Pisidia, they retrace their steps, strengthening the disciples and appointing elders, demonstrating resilience and the importance of community in spreading the Gospel. Their journey back to Antioch in Syria, where they report how God “had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles,” underscores the universal mission of the Church—a mission that feels particularly poignant as Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, begins his Petrine ministry on this day.

The Second Reading from Revelation 21:1-5a presents John’s vision of the new Jerusalem, where God declares, “Behold, I make all things new.” This vision of a renewed creation, free from tears and death, speaks to the hope of ultimate reconciliation and the fulfillment of God’s promises. On this day, as Pope Leo XIV is inaugurated, this reading invites reflection on how the Church, under new leadership, can be a beacon of renewal in a world marked by division and conflict. Leo XIV’s election, coming after his decades of service to the poor in Peru and his role in the Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops, suggests a pontificate that may prioritize missionary outreach and dialogue—values that echo the Augustinian principles he has lived by and the call to “make all things new” through Christ’s love.

The Gospel from John 13:31-33a, 34-35, at the heart of the Last Supper discourse, captures Jesus’ new commandment: “Love one another as I have loved you.” Jesus emphasizes that this love will be the defining mark of his disciples: “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” This call to radical, self-giving love is both a challenge and a promise, especially on a day when the Church celebrates the inauguration of a new pope. Pope Leo XIV, in his first address on May 8, echoed this theme, urging the faithful to “build bridges through dialogue and encounter, joining together as one people, always at peace.” His words align with the Gospel’s emphasis on love as the foundation of Christian witness, suggesting that his pontificate may focus on fostering unity and peace in a polarized world.

Adding another layer of significance, May 18 marks the birthday of Saint John Paul II, born in 1920 in Wadowice, Poland. John Paul II, the first non-Italian pope since the 16th century, became a global symbol of courage and faith, famously declaring at his 1978 inauguration, “Do not be afraid. Open wide the doors for Christ.” His papacy, which played a pivotal role in the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, embodied the missionary zeal and fearless love that the readings call for. Interestingly, Pope Leo XIV referenced this same spirit of courage in his homily on May 11, saying, “Take courage! Without fear!” The coincidence of his inauguration on John Paul II’s birthday feels providential, highlighting a continuity of mission. Both popes, coming from outside the traditional European center of the Church—John Paul II from Poland and Leo XIV from the United States—represent the Church’s universality, a theme that resonates with the Acts reading and its focus on opening the door of faith to all nations.

The inauguration Mass of Pope Leo XIV, held at 10 a.m. in St. Peter’s Square, is a historic moment for the Church. As the first U.S.-born pope, Leo XIV brings a unique perspective, shaped by his Chicago roots and his missionary work in Peru. His choice of the name Leo, inspired by Leo XIII’s focus on social justice in the modern era, signals an intent to address contemporary challenges like technological change and workers’ rights. The Mass, attended by global leaders and thousands of faithful, marks the formal start of his pontificate, a moment of renewal that mirrors the “new heaven and new earth” of Revelation. The Gospel’s call to love finds a living expression in Leo XIV’s early messages, which emphasize peace, dialogue, and service to the marginalized—values that also defined John Paul II’s legacy.

Reflecting on these readings and events, I’m struck by the interplay of love and renewal. The Church, on this Fifth Sunday of Easter, is reminded that its mission is to love as Christ loves, a love that is fresh, sacrificial, and universal. Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration, coinciding with Saint John Paul II’s birthday, feels like a divine invitation to carry forward this mission with courage and hope. As the Church steps into this new chapter, the readings challenge us to embody Christ’s love in our communities, to be agents of renewal in a broken world, and to trust that God, who makes all things new, will guide us through the leadership of Leo XIV, just as He did through John Paul II. In this moment, the call to “love one another” becomes a rallying cry for the Church’s future, uniting past, present, and future in the timeless mission of Christ.

Saint John Paul II: A Life of Faith, a Legacy of Hope, and a Saint for the Ages

Saint John Paul II: A Life of Faith, a Legacy of Hope, and a Saint for the Ages

Today, April 2, 2025, we pause to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the death of Saint John Paul II, a towering figure whose life and papacy reshaped the Catholic Church and touched the world. Two decades ago, on April 2, 2005, at 9:37 PM, the Vatican announced the passing of Karol Józef Wojtyła, the Polish priest who became a global shepherd. From his early struggles in war-torn Poland to his 26-year reign as pope and his canonization as a saint, John Paul II’s journey is a testament to resilience, faith, and an unshakable commitment to human dignity. As we mark this milestone, let’s dive deeper into the man, his transformative legacy, and the enduring gifts he brought to the Church and the papacy.

A Life Forged in Poland’s Crucible

Karol Józef Wojtyła was born on May 18, 1920, in the small town of Wadowice, Poland, about 50 kilometers from Kraków. The second of three children, he was raised in a devout Catholic family by his parents, Emilia and Karol Sr., a retired army officer. Tragedy struck early: his mother died of kidney failure in 1929 when Karol was just nine, followed by his older brother Edmund, a doctor, who succumbed to scarlet fever in 1932. By 1941, at age 21, Karol lost his father to a heart attack, leaving him the sole survivor of his immediate family. These losses instilled in him a profound sense of compassion and a reliance on prayer, often visiting the local parish church of St. Mary’s to find solace.

When Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939, Karol’s life took a dramatic turn. Forced to abandon his studies in Polish literature and theater at Jagiellonian University, he labored in a limestone quarry and later at the Solvay chemical plant to avoid deportation. Amid this oppression, he felt a call to the priesthood and began clandestine studies in 1942 under Archbishop Adam Stefan Sapieha, joining an underground seminary while risking arrest by the Gestapo. Ordained on November 1, 1946, in Kraków, he pursued further studies in Rome, earning a doctorate in theology with a thesis on St. John of the Cross.

Wojtyła’s rise in the Church was steady but remarkable. Appointed auxiliary bishop of Kraków in 1958, he became its archbishop in 1964 and was elevated to cardinal by Pope Paul VI in 1967. His pastoral work in communist Poland—defending religious freedom against an atheist regime—prepared him for the global stage. On October 16, 1978, at 58, he was elected pope, taking the name John Paul II in honor of his predecessor, John Paul I, who died after just 33 days in office. As the first non-Italian pope since 1523 and the first from a Slavic nation, his election signaled a new era for the Church.

A Papacy That Changed the World

John Paul II’s pontificate, spanning October 16, 1978, to April 2, 2005, was the third-longest in history at 26 years, 5 months, and 17 days. Known as “The Pilgrim Pope,” he traveled over 1.1 million kilometers, visiting 129 countries and meeting millions of people. His first foreign trip, to the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and the Bahamas in January 1979, set the tone for a papacy defined by outreach. He spoke eight languages fluently—Polish, Italian, English, French, German, Spanish, Russian, and Latin—allowing him to connect directly with diverse cultures.

Perhaps his most historic contribution was his role in dismantling communism. On June 2, 1979, he returned to Poland for a nine-day pilgrimage, celebrating Mass in Warsaw’s Victory Square before 250,000 people. His words—“Be not afraid!”—echoed beyond the crowd, galvanizing the Solidarity trade union movement led by Lech Wałęsa. Over the next decade, his moral support and subtle diplomacy helped topple Soviet control in Eastern Europe, culminating in the Berlin Wall’s fall in 1989. Lech Wałęsa later said, “Without him, there would have been no end to communism—or it would have taken much longer.”

John Paul II survived a near-fatal assassination attempt on May 13, 1981, when Turkish gunman Mehmet Ali Ağca shot him in St. Peter’s Square. Two bullets struck his abdomen, but he recovered after emergency surgery, attributing his survival to the Virgin Mary, whose feast of Our Lady of Fatima coincided with the attack. In a stunning act of forgiveness, he visited Ağca in Rome’s Rebibbia Prison on December 27, 1983, offering absolution face-to-face—a moment that epitomized his belief in mercy.

His intellectual output was prodigious. He authored 14 encyclicals, including Redemptor Hominis (1979), which rooted human dignity in Christ, and Centesimus Annus (1991), which critiqued both capitalism and socialism while advocating a just economy. His Theology of the Body, delivered in 129 weekly audiences from 1979 to 1984, offered a groundbreaking vision of human sexuality as a gift reflecting divine love. He also canonized 482 saints—more than all his predecessors combined—including St. Faustina Kowalska (2000), the apostle of Divine Mercy, and St. Maximilian Kolbe (1982), a martyr of Auschwitz.

John Paul II reached out to the young, launching World Youth Day in 1985. The first event in Rome drew 300,000 attendees, and subsequent gatherings—like the 1995 Manila event with 5 million participants—became hallmarks of his papacy. He also advanced interfaith dialogue, visiting Rome’s Great Synagogue on April 13, 1986—the first pope to do so—and praying at the Western Wall in Jerusalem on March 26, 2000. That same year, during the Great Jubilee, he issued a historic apology for the Church’s past sins, including the Crusades and the Inquisition, seeking forgiveness in a Mass at St. Peter’s Basilica on March 12.

The Path to Sainthood

By the late 1990s, John Paul II’s health declined due to Parkinson’s disease, diagnosed in 1992, and the lingering effects of the 1981 shooting. Yet he pressed on, his trembling hands and frail voice becoming symbols of perseverance. On April 2, 2005, after a urinary tract infection worsened his condition, he died in his Apostolic Palace apartment at 9:37 PM, surrounded by aides and praying the Rosary. Over 3 million pilgrims flooded Rome for his funeral on April 8, 2005, where banners reading “Santo Subito!” (“Saint Now!”) waved in St. Peter’s Square.

Pope Benedict XVI, his successor and longtime friend, fast-tracked the canonization process, waiving the five-year waiting period on May 13, 2005. The first miracle, confirmed in 2011, involved Sister Marie Simon-Pierre, a French nun cured of Parkinson’s after praying to John Paul II. The second, approved in 2013, saw Floribeth Mora Díaz of Costa Rica healed of a brain aneurysm after his beatification. On April 27, 2014, Pope Francis canonized John Paul II alongside John XXIII in a dual ceremony attended by over 800,000 people, cementing his sainthood. His feast day, October 22, marks the anniversary of his 1978 papal inauguration.

The 20th Anniversary: A Milestone of Memory

Today, April 2, 2025, we stand 20 years removed from that somber evening when the Vatican’s lights dimmed. At 84, John Paul II left a Church invigorated yet challenged by modernity. This anniversary arrives amid global tensions—war in Ukraine, cultural shifts, and debates over faith’s role in society—making his message of hope and unity strikingly relevant. In Poland, Masses in Wadowice and Kraków honor his roots, while Rome hosts a special vigil in St. Peter’s Square, echoing the crowds of 2005.

His personal trials resonate anew: surviving Nazi and Soviet oppression, enduring physical pain, and forgiving his attacker. His final words, whispered in Polish—“Let me go to the house of the Father”—reflect a serene trust in God that inspires believers still.

A Lasting Legacy for the Church and Papacy

Saint John Paul II redefined the papacy as a global ministry. He appointed 117 cardinals, including future leaders like Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger) and Francis (Jorge Bergoglio), shaping the Church’s trajectory. His use of television, radio, and later the internet brought the Vatican into living rooms worldwide, with his 1995 book Crossing the Threshold of Hope selling millions. He elevated the papacy’s moral authority, addressing issues like abortion, war, and poverty with clarity and compassion.

His contributions endure in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), which he oversaw, providing a comprehensive guide to doctrine. His emphasis on the “new evangelization” called Catholics to renew their faith in a secular age, a mission Pope Francis continues. His devotion to Mary, reflected in his motto Totus Tuus (“Totally Yours”), deepened Marian piety, while his promotion of Divine Mercy through St. Faustina’s canonization spread a message of God’s love.

Conclusion: A Saint Who Walks With Us

Twenty years after his death, Saint John Paul II remains a beacon. He was a poet who wrote plays like The Jeweler’s Shop, a philosopher who grappled with existentialism, and a pastor who knelt with the poor. His life—from a boy in Wadowice to the Vicar of Christ—shows that holiness is possible amid chaos. As we honor this anniversary, let’s heed his call from October 22, 1978: “Open wide the doors to Christ!” In a fractured world, his prayer, courage, and love remind us that the future, as he said, “starts today, not tomorrow.” May Saint John Paul II, the Great, intercede for us all.

---