Showing posts with label President Biden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Biden. Show all posts

Monday, January 20, 2025

Inauguration Day 2025: A Historic Return to Power

Inauguration Day 2025: A Historic Return to Power

On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 47th President of the United States, marking his return to the White House for a second non-consecutive term. This historic event was filled with significant moments, executive orders, and a shift in the political landscape.

The Ceremony

The inauguration ceremony took place inside the Capitol Rotunda, a departure from the traditional outdoor setting due to the frigid temperatures in Washington, D.C. Members of Congress, Supreme Court justices, the Trump family, and various dignitaries, including tech CEOs, were in attendance. President Trump delivered a 30-minute speech, emphasizing the beginning of a "golden age of America" and promising that the country would flourish and be respected worldwide.

"Prayers"

There was some controversy surrounding the "prayers" said during the ceremony. While prayers by Cardinal Dolan, archbishop of the Archdiocese of NY, and Father Frank Mann of the Diocese of Brooklyn were theologically sound, other "prayers" were more speeches filled with jabs at Biden than anything else.  Franklin Graham, the son of the late preacher Billy Graham started his invocation with a jab at President Biden. At the benediction, Rabbi Ari Berman and Lorenzo Sewell gave what seemed to be more like speeches or lectures than actual prayer.  Sewell even began to imitate the late Dr. Martin Luther King JR with an over-dramatic performance.  

Executive Orders

Immediately after taking the oath of office, President Trump signed a series of executive orders. These orders included freezing federal hiring except for the military, requiring federal workers to return to full-time, in-person work, and directing every federal department to address inflation. One of the most notable orders was the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement, a move that had significant implications for global climate policy.

The Rally and Further Actions

Following the ceremony, President Trump addressed a roaring crowd at Capital One Arena, where he signed additional executive orders. These included pardoning those convicted of storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization. The president also hinted at future negotiations regarding U.S. involvement in international organizations, citing the high costs compared to other countries.

International Reactions and Speculations

The inauguration was not without its controversies. Rumors circulated that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had requested to attend the inauguration but was unofficially turned down. This speculation added to the already tense international atmosphere, with President Trump expressing his intention to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and positioning himself as a "peacemaker".

A New Era

As President Trump begins his second term, the political landscape of the United States is poised for significant changes. His administration's focus on reversing Democratic policies, increasing energy production, and creating a Department of Government Efficiency signals a shift towards conservative governance. The inauguration of 2025 will be remembered as a pivotal moment in American history, marking the return of a controversial yet influential figure to the highest office in the land.


: [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/donald-trump-inauguration-2025/?id=117863147&entryId=117916141)

: [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/donald-trump-inauguration-2025/?id=117863147&entryId=117919581)

: [Newsweek](https://www.newsweek.com/did-zelensky-ask-attend-trump-inauguration-2017925)

: [CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/trump-presidential-inauguration-day-2025/)

: [NBC News](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/live-blog/trump-inauguration-2025-live-updates-rcna184510)

FULL TEXT: Cardinal Dolan’s Prayer For President Trump on Inauguration Day| National Catholic Register

Who Is Rev. Lorenzo Sewell? Detroit Pastor Selected Pastor For Inauguration Prayer

Prayers on Inauguration Day will come from these pastors – Deseret News


Wednesday, July 24, 2024

Biden Addresses Nation About His Exit

On July 24, 2024, President Joe Biden delivered a significant speech from the Oval Office, marking a pivotal moment in his political career and the current political landscape of the United States. In his address, President Biden outlined the reasons behind his decision to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race, emphasizing the importance of unity and the defense of democracy.

The speech was a solemn reflection on the state of the nation and the challenges it faces. President Biden spoke of the sacred task of perfecting the union, a task that transcends any individual and is the collective responsibility of all Americans. He highlighted the critical choice the country faces between moving forward or backward, hope or hate, unity or division. The President called on the nation to see those with differing opinions not as enemies but as fellow Americans, to uphold values such as honesty, decency, respect, freedom, justice, and democracy.

In a moment of selfless leadership, President Biden expressed that the cause of American democracy is larger than any one person's ambition, including his own. By stepping aside, he aimed to unite the Democratic Party and the country in the effort to protect and strengthen the democratic process. He passed the torch to a new generation, signaling a time for fresh voices to lead the way.

The speech was not only a withdrawal from the presidential race but also a call to action for all citizens to engage in the defense of democracy. It was a reminder that the work of building a better nation is ongoing and requires the participation of every individual.

The main points of President Biden's speech on July 24, 2024, can be summarized as follows:

1. Withdrawal from the Presidential Race: President Biden announced his decision not to seek re-election, emphasizing the need for unity within the Democratic Party and the country.

2. Defense of Democracy: He stressed the importance of defending the democratic values that define the United States, such as honesty, decency, respect, freedom, justice, and democracy.

3. Call for Unity: The President urged the nation to come together, to view those with differing opinions not as enemies but as fellow Americans, and to work collectively towards perfecting the union.

4. Passing the Torch: By stepping aside, President Biden signaled a time for new leadership and encouraged a new generation to take up the mantle of guiding the country forward.

5. Active Citizenship: He called on every citizen to engage in the defense and strengthening of democracy, highlighting that the responsibility lies with each individual.

6. Reflection on National Challenges: The speech served as a reflection on the current state of the nation and the challenges it faces, with a focus on moving forward with hope and unity.

The speech was a defining moment for President Biden's presidency and a significant event in American politics, setting the stage for the upcoming election and the future of the nation's leadership. It was a call to action for all Americans to participate in the democratic process and contribute to the ongoing task of building a better country. The full transcript of the speech is available for those who wish to explore the President's message in greater detail.

President Biden's decision has set the stage for new leadership and has undoubtedly shaped the discourse around the upcoming election. His speech has been analyzed by political commentators and the public alike, sparking conversations about the future of American politics and the role of leadership in times of change.

For those interested in delving deeper into the President's words, the full transcript of his speech is available, providing an opportunity to reflect on the messages conveyed and the implications for the nation's path forward.The implications for the Democratic Party following President Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race are significant and multifaceted. The party now faces the challenge of quickly rallying behind a new candidate to maintain unity and momentum in the upcoming election. Here are some key considerations and potential outcomes:

1. Unity and Leadership: The Democratic Party must find a way to unite behind a new leader who can carry forward the party's agenda and values. This leader will need to be someone who can appeal to the diverse factions within the party and galvanize voters.

2. Nomination Process: With President Biden endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, there is a strong possibility that she will become the frontrunner for the nomination. However, the process of selecting a nominee may involve a competitive primary, which could either strengthen the eventual nominee through a rigorous vetting process or lead to internal divisions.

3. Policy Direction: The new nominee will influence the policy direction of the party. Depending on who emerges as the candidate, the party may lean more towards progressive policies or maintain a more centrist approach.

4. Election Strategy: The Democratic Party will need to reassess its strategy for the general election. Without an incumbent in the race, the party has the opportunity to present a fresh face and new ideas to voters, but it also loses the advantage of running on the record of a sitting president.

5. Voter Engagement: Engaging voters and ensuring a high turnout will be crucial. The new nominee will need to inspire confidence and excitement among the electorate to mobilize the base and attract undecided voters.

6. Impact on Down-Ballot Races: The choice of nominee could have a ripple effect on down-ballot races. A strong presidential candidate can boost the prospects of other Democratic candidates in congressional, state, and local elections.

7. Response to Opposition: The Democratic Party will have to navigate the political landscape and respond effectively to the strategies and narratives of the Republican Party and other opponents.

8. Global Perception: The international community will be closely watching the Democratic Party's response to this development. The party's ability to handle this transition smoothly will affect global perceptions of American political stability and leadership.

In conclusion, President Biden's decision not to seek re-election has introduced a new dynamic into the 2024 presidential race, presenting both challenges and opportunities for the Democratic Party. The party's actions in the coming weeks and months will be critical in shaping the political landscape and determining the outcome of the election. The full implications of this decision will unfold over time, but one thing is certain: the Democratic Party is at a crossroads, and its next steps will have lasting effects on the future of American politics.

This moment in history serves as a testament to the enduring strength of American democracy and the belief that it is a living, evolving entity that thrives on the active participation and dedication of its people.

Monday, July 22, 2024

President Biden Drops Out of Race

In a significant turn of events, President Joe Biden announced at 1:45 PM on Sunday his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor for the Democratic nomination. This decision comes after a series of developments that raised concerns within the Democratic Party about his candidacy.

President Biden's decision marks a rare and historic moment in American politics. It is uncommon for a sitting president to withdraw from a reelection campaign, especially so close to the election. The announcement has sent ripples through the political landscape, prompting a wide range of reactions from party members, political analysts, and voters alike.

The move follows a challenging debate performance and growing sentiment within the party regarding the President's ability to lead and campaign effectively. In a statement, President Biden expressed that stepping down is in the best interest of the party and the country, emphasizing his commitment to fulfilling his duties as President for the remainder of his term.

Vice President Harris has expressed gratitude for the endorsement and has pledged to unite the Democratic Party and the nation in the upcoming election. The endorsement is seen as a strategic move to consolidate support within the party and present a united front against the Republican nominee.

This development has undoubtedly set the stage for an intense and unpredictable race to the White House. With the Democratic National Convention approaching, the party must now navigate this unprecedented situation and rally behind a new candidate. The coming weeks are expected to be a critical period for the Democrats as they reorganize their campaign strategy and messaging in light of President Biden's withdrawal.

The implications of President Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race are multifaceted and have the potential to reshape the political landscape in the United States. This unprecedented move by a sitting president not to seek re-election has several immediate and long-term consequences.

Political Implications:

The immediate political implication is the opening of the Democratic nomination process. With President Biden endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party is likely to rally behind her to present a united front. However, this could also lead to an open contest, inviting other potential candidates to vie for the nomination, which could either strengthen the party through a robust primary process or expose divisions within its ranks.

Financial Market Reactions:

Financial markets tend to react to political uncertainty, and President Biden's withdrawal is no exception. The announcement has already caused some fluctuations, with investors weighing the impact of this political shift. The stability of financial markets will depend on how quickly and effectively the Democratic Party consolidates its position and whether a clear frontrunner emerges.

Defense and Foreign Policy Considerations:

The withdrawal could have implications for defense and foreign policy, particularly concerning major defense contractors and the military-industrial complex. Companies like Lockheed Martin may anticipate changes in defense policies or contracts depending on who becomes the next president.

Impact on the Republican Strategy:

For the Republican Party, President Biden's withdrawal necessitates a recalibration of their campaign strategy. They must now prepare to face a new Democratic nominee, which could be Vice President Harris or another candidate who emerges from the primaries. This change introduces a new set of dynamics into the race, as the GOP will need to adjust its messaging and tactics.

Public Perception and Democratic Process:

The decision also has implications for public perception and the democratic process. President Biden's letter to the American people outlines his reasons for withdrawing, which may influence how the public views the transparency and accountability of political leaders. An open and competitive primary process could engage the electorate and enhance the legitimacy of the eventual nominee.

Historical Significance:

Historically, President Biden's withdrawal is a rare occurrence that will be analyzed and discussed for years to come. It sets a precedent for future presidents and candidates, and it will be a significant case study for political scientists and historians examining presidential elections and party dynamics.

President Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 race has created a moment of uncertainty and opportunity in American politics. The implications of this decision will unfold over the coming months, influencing the direction of the Democratic Party, the strategies of the Republicans, and the choices of the American electorate. The 2024 presidential election is poised to be a historic and transformative event, with potential outcomes that are still difficult to predict. 

President Biden's unexpected withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race is poised to have a profound impact on the Democratic primary debates. The debates, which are a cornerstone of the primary process, offer candidates a platform to present their policies, challenge their opponents, and connect with voters. With Biden stepping aside, the dynamics of these debates are set to change significantly.

A New Focus for Debates:

Without the incumbent president in the race, the debates will likely shift focus. Candidates will have more space to outline their visions for the future without contrasting them directly against Biden's record. This could lead to a broader range of topics and more in-depth discussions on policy issues.

Increased Intensity and Competition:

Biden's endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris positions her as a frontrunner, but it also opens the door for other candidates to step up their campaigns. The debates will become a critical battleground for candidates to differentiate themselves and gain traction among voters. This could result in more intense and competitive debates as candidates vie for attention and support.

Greater Scrutiny on Vice President Harris:

As the endorsed candidate, Vice President Harris will face increased scrutiny during the debates. Her performance, policies, and ability to lead will be under the microscope, and she will need to use the debates to solidify her position as the new leader of the Democratic Party.

Opportunity for Lesser-Known Candidates:

The reshuffling of the race provides an opportunity for lesser-known candidates to make a name for themselves. With a more open field, these candidates can use the debates to introduce themselves to a national audience and potentially disrupt the established order.

Impact on Debate Strategies:

Campaigns will need to reassess their debate strategies in light of Biden's withdrawal. Without the need to directly challenge an incumbent, candidates may adopt different tactics, focusing more on presenting their platforms and less on attacking the record of the current administration.

Influence on Voter Engagement:

The unexpected turn of events could lead to increased voter interest and engagement in the debates. The new developments add an element of unpredictability to the race, which may draw more viewers to the debates as they seek to understand the implications of Biden's withdrawal.

Implications for Democratic Unity:

The debates will play a crucial role in fostering unity within the Democratic Party. Candidates will need to balance competition with the need to present a united front against the Republican nominee. How they navigate this challenge will be key to maintaining party cohesion.

In conclusion, President Biden's withdrawal from the race introduces a new era for the Democratic primary debates. The upcoming debates will be instrumental in shaping the future of the Democratic Party and its chances in the 2024 presidential election. As the political landscape evolves, the debates will serve as a pivotal forum for candidates to articulate their visions and for voters to make informed decisions about the future leadership of their country.  

As the nation processes this news, attention now turns to Vice President Harris and her campaign. The political dynamics of the 2024 election are shifting, and the outcome remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that this election cycle will be one for the history books, with its unexpected twists and the potential for further surprises on the road to November.

President Biden made the right decision. He is simply not well enough to handle the heavy responsibility of the presidency of the United States of America.  Those pushing for him to stay were inconsiderate and were pretty much engaging in elder abuse.  The man is not well. We all could see this, especially during the presidential debate.  He endorsed Kamala, but she shares his vision and record which is not very popular now.  It is most likely that the Democrats will lose the presidency.  

We pray for Mr. Biden and wish him the best.  


 

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Biden Says '... picked Vice President Trump to be Vice President'

In a recent press conference meant to show Biden is competent to be president, President Joe Biden made a verbal slip-up that quickly became the subject of media attention and public discourse. 

While intending to refer to Vice President Kamala Harris, President Biden mistakenly used the name "Vice President Trump." This gaffe occurred during a NATO summit press conference, a setting where every word is closely scrutinized by the press and public alike.  The slip-up happened just hours after Biden introduced President of Ukraine Zelensky as President Putin. 

Such slips of the tongue are not uncommon in the high-pressure environment of politics, where leaders are expected to deliver precise and impactful messages often without the benefit of a script. President Biden, known for his candid speaking style, has had his share of verbal missteps in the past, which he typically addresses with a quick correction and a move forward in the conversation.




The reaction to this particular incident was mixed, with some seeing it as a harmless mistake while others raised questions about its implications. It's important to note that public figures are constantly under the microscope, and their words can be magnified and analyzed, sometimes out of proportion to the intent or importance of the message.

In the context of the press conference, President Biden was discussing the qualifications of Vice President Harris to potentially lead the nation. His inadvertent reference to "Vice President Trump" was quickly corrected, but it did not escape the notice of the media and the public. This moment highlights the intense scrutiny faced by political leaders and the challenges they encounter in consistently delivering messages under the public eye.

The role of the media in such instances is to report on these events, providing context and analysis. It's also an opportunity for the public to reflect on the nature of political communication and the expectations we place on our leaders. While perfection in speech is an unrealistic expectation for anyone, the ability to communicate effectively and handle the inevitable slip-ups with grace is a valuable skill in the political arena.

This incident serves as a reminder of the human element in politics, where even the most experienced leaders can have a lapse in speech. It also underscores the importance of focusing on the substance of the message rather than the occasional stumble in its delivery. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the public's understanding and interpretation of these moments will undoubtedly play a role in shaping the discourse around our leaders and their communication styles.



Source:

Biden calls Kamala Harris ‘Vice President Trump’ to kick off error-strewn ‘big boy’ press conference (nypost.com)

President Biden calls VP Harris 'Vice President Trump' during high-stakes press conference (msnbc.com)

In Latest Gaffe, Biden Calls Kamala Harris "Vice President Trump" (ndtv.com)

Biden calls Harris 'Vice President Trump' while answering to candidacy concerns (nbcnews.com)

Biden makes gaffe at top of press conference, calls Vice President Harris ‘Vice President Trump’ | Fox News Video

Biden news conference carries high stakes as campaign teeters (cnbc.com)

biden vice president trump - Google Search



Friday, March 8, 2024

State of the Union 2024

The State of the Union Address: What Biden Said and How He Was Criticized

On Thursday, March 7, 2024, President Joe Biden delivered his second State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. The speech was a high-stakes moment for Biden, who is facing a tough reelection campaign against former President Donald Trump, who has not conceded his 2020 loss and has repeatedly attacked Biden's legitimacy and performance.

In his address, Biden focused on his economic agenda, touting his achievements in creating jobs, raising wages, expanding health care coverage, and combating climate change. He also called for higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, saying they should pay their "fair share" to fund his proposed investments in infrastructure, education, research, and clean energy. He said his plans would make the U.S. more competitive and resilient in the face of global challenges and threats.

Biden also slammed Trump multiple times, blaming him for the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol, the mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic, the erosion of democracy, and the damage to America's reputation abroad. He said Trump was "a threat to our nation and our values" and urged Americans to reject his "big lie" that the 2020 election was stolen. He said he was determined to defend and strengthen democracy at home and abroad.  Biden attacked Republicans on their push to end abortion claiming that if they take away a woman's right then what other rights will they take. 

Biden's speech was met with applause and cheers from Democrats, who praised his vision and leadership. However, Republicans were largely critical of his address, accusing him of being divisive, radical, and out of touch with reality. They said he was pursuing a socialist agenda that would hurt the economy, increase the debt, raise taxes, kill jobs, and weaken national security. They also challenged his claims of bipartisanship, saying he had ignored their input and proposals on various issues. Some of the booed the president and heckled him. 

The Republican response to Biden's address was delivered by Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, who is one of the youngest and most prominent members of her party. Britt said Biden had failed to deliver on his promises of unity and healing, and had instead governed with "arrogance and condescension." She said Republicans had a better vision for America, one that respected individual freedom, limited government, free markets, strong families, and constitutional rights. She said Republicans would fight for policies that would create opportunity, prosperity, security, and peace for all Americans.

Biden's State of the Union address was watched by an estimated 40 million viewers across various platforms , slightly lower than his first address in 2021 . The speech received mixed reviews from pundits and analysts , with some praising his optimism and confidence , and others criticizing his lack of specifics and realism . The speech also sparked reactions from various groups and stakeholders , such as labor unions , business groups , environmentalists , civil rights activists , foreign leaders , and celebrities.  Disgraced former congressman George Santos was present and claimed he will run again for the seat of Rep. Nick LaLota in New York’s First Congressional District, which covers most of Suffolk County on eastern Long Island.

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus. Be sure to remember to follow the rules so your comment can be allowed.



References:

Friday, June 30, 2023

SCOTUS Knocks Down LGBT Tyranny & Student Freebies

The Supreme Court is on a roll this week!  First, they knocked down Affirmative Action which is on its face racist and discriminatory, and now has affirmed the first amendment matters. The Court in a 6-3 decision ruled in favor of Lorie Smith, a Christian web designer who refused to create a website promoting so-called "same-sex marriage." She was of course sued on the pretense of discrimination. 

In the past, Christians became the target of gay couples who were seeking to make an example out of them when the odds were in their favor. Back then, more liberals controlled the court and legislated from the bench. They often decided in favor of the LGBTQIA community setting aside the text of the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment, in favor of inferences that made no legislative or rational sense when compared to the Constitution. 

Well, things are different now. The Court decided to protect the First Amendment rights of Christians and overall conscience rights. Immediately the left cried out "Second-class citizenship!" In other words, they feel the LGBTQIA community will not be seen as second-class citizens. Justice Sotomayor wrote in a dissent,

"Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. Specifically, the Court holds that the First Amendment exempts a website design company from a state law that prohibits the company from denying wedding websites to same-sex couples if the company chooses to sell those websites to the public. The Court also holds that the company has a right to post a notice that says, “‘no [wedding websites] will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages.’”

There is speculation that Sotomayor herself may be a lesbian due to her passionate responses whenever the other justices decide against the LGBTQIA community. What she and other leftists fail to realize is that one party cannot force another party to go against their beliefs whether religious or not. No one is being denied service. Cakes, pizzas, and websites can be made for the LGBTQIA community, but not ones with content that goes against the provider of the service. This should be common sense to anyone who has reasoning skills. For example, one cannot ask a Jewish caterer to create Nazi theme meals or a Muslim-run business to create something that contains pork. Not only is it disrespectful, but an affront to the person's conscience rights.

The Supreme Court also gave a huge blow to President Biden's Student Loan Forgiveness program which sort to erase all or most of the debt students have accrued during their studies in college. The plan was welcomed by many students who feel that student loans are like owing money to a Mafia loan shark. However, many others protested the idea believing it to be fiscally irresponsible and teaching students in college to be irresponsible. The reason they go to college is to earn a degree so as to get a better-paying job to pay for living expenses including debts and mortgages. Paying off their student debt with taxpayer money sends the message that they do not have to pay back debts. It creates an atmosphere of irresponsibility. Students can study on loans and then not pay them back while relying on the government to use taxpayer dollars to pay back loans. The idea sends the wrong message.  

What is next? Will people who owe rent or mortgages demand the government uses taxpayer dollars to bail them out?  Some may bring up the 2008 bailing of banks, but that situation was different. Banks are important in a capitalist society. They need to be up and running, not failing and collapsing. The bail money they were given was not free money either. They had to pay it back to the taxpayers. Paying student loans is way different. No one is paying taxpayers back if this plan took hold in the united states. This decision was also a great one.  President Biden is now assuring students in debt of a "plan b" approach in order to circumvent the Supreme Court's ruling. 

Are we starting to see the Supreme Court actually upholding the Constitution? It sure looks like it.  It looks like the majority of the justices are interpreting the Constitution as it is and not inferring on it what it does not state. We saw this with the Dobbs decision last year which knocked down Roe vs Wade. Roe vs Wade was decided on the premise that women had equality and the right to privacy. How does this even add up to abortion?  Where does abortion even fit in this?  It made no sense and had to be overturned.  Similarly, cases like Obergefell were decided on claims that equality exists and enumerated rights are granted, therefore same-sex couples can marry.  The Constitution does not even mention marriage or abortion!  

Hopefully, the Supreme Court of the United States continues on this path and will eventually overturn Obergefell restoring marriage as only being between one man and one woman.  Today's ruling ended "Pride Month" on a sour note for the LGBTQIA community.  

You can read the Court's opinions here:

21-476 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (06/30/2023) (supremecourt.gov)

22-535 Department of Education v. Brown (06/30/2023) (supremecourt.gov)

22-506 Biden v. Nebraska (06/30/2023) (supremecourt.gov)


What do you think?  Post your comment below. Remember to follow the rules so your comment can be posted. 



Source:

Gay couple cited by Christian web designer who won Supreme Court case may not exist (yahoo.com)

Supreme Court Just Marked ‘Gays and Lesbians For Second-Class Status’ Declared Sotomayor In Scathing Dissent: ‘Profoundly Wrong’ (msn.com)

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Web Designer Who Refuses to Promote Gay Weddings (mediaite.com)

Supreme Court injustice: ‘legal innocence’ is not enough (msn.com)

'Embarrassing': Sotomayor slams SCOTUS decision that marks 'gays and lesbians for second-class status' (msn.com)

'Nuclear hypocrisy': Legal experts stunned by SCOTUS' 'weird' ruling in LGBTQ rights case (msn.com)

A Huge Win for the First Amendment (msn.com)

'Loaded gun': Expert suggests LGBTQ ruling paves way to return to 'Whites-only' luncheonettes (msn.com)

Biden unveils new student loan forgiveness plan after Supreme Court defeat (usatoday.com)

June 30, 2023 SCOTUS blocks Biden's student loan plan and limits LGBTQ protections (cnn.com)

What Will Happen to Your Student Loans Now - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Roberts scolds liberal justices for demonizing rulings they don't like: 'Disturbing feature' of dissents (msn.com)

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/30/opinion/affirmative-action-supreme-court-repeal.html

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1629) Jesus (758) God (746) Bible (618) Atheism (400) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (347) Liturgy of the Word (322) Apologetics (294) Atheist (280) Science (238) Christianity (202) Theology (149) LGBT (148) Liturgy (139) Blessed Virgin Mary (126) Prayer (98) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Pope Benedict XVI (93) Philosophy (92) Traditionalists (83) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Vatican (76) Physics (74) Psychology (74) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) New York City (61) Christian (60) President Obama (59) Protestant (53) Vatican II (51) Health (49) Biology (48) Gospel (46) Politics (46) Women (44) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Death (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) NYPD (32) Pope John Paul II (32) priests (32) Priesthood (29) Space (28) Astrophysics (27) Eucharist (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Religious Freedom (27) Donald Trump (25) Evangelization (25) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Pentecostals (15) Sacraments (15) Angels (14) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Poverty (13) September 11 (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) academia (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evangelicals (9) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Death penalty (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)