Showing posts with label New Orleans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Orleans. Show all posts

Friday, January 3, 2025

New Year 2025 Violent Start

Tragedy on Bourbon Street: The New Year’s 2025 Terrorist Attack in New Orleans

In the early hours of January 1, 2025, a horrific terrorist attack shattered the festive atmosphere of New Year’s celebrations in New Orleans, Louisiana, leaving 14 revelers dead and at least 57 others injured. At around 3:15 a.m. CST, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a 42-year-old U.S. Army veteran from Houston, Texas, drove a rented Ford F-150 Lightning pickup truck into a crowd on Bourbon Street in the city’s iconic French Quarter. The attack, which the FBI has classified as an act of domestic terrorism inspired by the Islamic State (ISIS), has reignited debates about public safety, the evolving nature of terrorism, and the challenges of preventing such attacks.
The Attack: A Night of Celebration Turned to Chaos
Bourbon Street, known worldwide for its vibrant nightlife and as a hub for New Year’s Eve parties, was packed with people ringing in 2025. Many were in town for the Sugar Bowl college football playoff game scheduled later that day at the Superdome. Witnesses described a scene of joy turning to horror as Jabbar’s white pickup truck barreled through the crowd at high speed, deliberately targeting pedestrians over a three-block stretch. Surveillance footage later revealed the truck bypassing a police barricade, driving onto the sidewalk, and accelerating into the crowd.
Zion Parsons, a bystander, told CNN, “The best way I can describe it is truly a war zone. There were bodies and blood and all the trash. People were terrified, running, screaming.” Jim and Nicole Mowrer, visiting from Iowa, recounted to CBS News how they narrowly escaped the truck’s path, later finding several victims who had been fatally struck. After mowing down dozens, Jabbar exited the vehicle armed with an AR-15-style rifle with a homemade suppressor and a handgun, opening fire on police. Two officers were injured in the ensuing shootout, but they managed to fatally shoot Jabbar. The officers were later reported to be in stable condition.
The attack left 14 dead, including a young mother, a former Princeton football player, and a New York-based account executive named Billy DiMaio, who was described by his employer, Audacy, as a “true asset” known for his kindness and work ethic. At least 57 others were injured, including two Israeli citizens and a University of Georgia student. The New Orleans Coroner, Dr. Dwight McKenna, noted that identifying the victims would take several days due to the need for autopsies and notifications of next of kin.
The Attacker: A Lone Wolf Inspired by ISIS
The FBI identified the attacker as Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a U.S. citizen and Army veteran who served as a human resources and IT specialist from 2007 to 2015, and later in the Army Reserve until 2020. Jabbar, who had a bachelor’s degree in computer information systems from Georgia State University, struggled to adjust to civilian life after his military service, according to a 2015 interview with the university’s student paper. He had worked at Deloitte since 2021, and the company expressed outrage over the attack, pledging to assist authorities.
Investigators found an ISIS flag in the truck, along with two pipe bombs concealed in coolers, rigged with shrapnel and a wireless remote for detonation. The FBI described the bombs as “crude” and indicative of Jabbar’s inexperience, as they lacked proper detonators despite containing RDX, a powerful explosive. Jabbar had posted five videos on social media between 1:29 a.m. and 3:02 a.m. that morning, pledging allegiance to ISIS and expressing a desire to kill. In one video, he revealed he had initially planned to target his family but shifted focus to ensure headlines would highlight the “war between the believers and the disbelievers,” according to FBI Deputy Assistant Director Christopher Raia.
The FBI initially suspected Jabbar had accomplices, citing surveillance footage showing three men and a woman placing one of the explosive devices. However, by January 2, the agency concluded Jabbar acted alone, with no evidence of direct contact or direction from ISIS, pointing to a case of self-radicalization. Jabbar’s family expressed shock, telling CNN that the man they knew was not the one who carried out this attack. Videos he recorded while driving from Houston to New Orleans also mentioned his divorce and a desire to kill his family, hinting at personal struggles that may have contributed to his radicalization.
A City’s Vulnerability: The Failure of Security Measures
The attack exposed significant vulnerabilities in New Orleans’ security infrastructure. The city had previously installed permanent vehicle barriers, known as bollards, to protect the French Quarter from such attacks, but they were undergoing replacement ahead of the Super Bowl on February 9, 2025. Temporary Archer barriers, acquired in 2017, were available but not deployed until after the attack, a decision that baffled Police Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick, who was unaware of their existence until after the incident. A 2019 report by Interfor International had warned of the “highly possible” risk of vehicular attacks in the French Quarter, recommending immediate improvements to bollard systems—a warning that went unheeded.
New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell called the incident a “terrorist attack,” a designation the FBI later confirmed. Kirkpatrick emphasized Jabbar’s intent, stating, “He was hell-bent on creating the carnage that he did.” The attack occurred despite the police force being “staffed 100%” for New Year’s Eve and the Sugar Bowl, highlighting the difficulty of preventing such low-tech, high-impact attacks. Paul Mauro, a former NYPD inspector, told Fox News that vehicle-ramming has become a “tactic of choice” for terrorists globally due to its devastating potential, especially with a 5,000-pound vehicle in an urban area.
National and International Response
President Joe Biden, speaking from Camp David on January 1, condemned the “despicable attack,” noting Jabbar’s ISIS inspiration and desire to kill. Biden expressed solidarity with the victims, saying, “My heart goes out to the victims and their families who were simply trying to celebrate the holiday.” President-elect Donald Trump, posting on Truth Social, called the attack an “act of pure evil,” vowing support for New Orleans during his upcoming administration. He controversially linked the attack to broader crime rates, a claim that lacks substantiation but reflects his campaign rhetoric on immigration and security.
Attorney General Merrick Garland confirmed the FBI’s terrorism investigation, with support from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Security Division. The rifle used by Jabbar was legally purchased in Arlington, Texas, on November 19, 2024, though the handgun’s origins remain under investigation. The truck, rented via the peer-to-peer platform Turo, crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in Eagle Pass, Texas, in November, though Jabbar was not the driver at the time.
The attack drew comparisons to other vehicle-ramming incidents, such as the 2016 Nice, France, attack that killed 86 people, and a recent Christmas market attack in Magdeburg, Germany, on December 20, 2024, which killed five. Islamic terrorist groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda have long promoted such tactics, with ISIS’s Rumiyah magazine in 2016 encouraging supporters to use vehicles to “mow down the enemies of Allah.”
A Critical Perspective: Systemic Failures and Broader Implications
While the attack was a tragedy, it also raises critical questions about systemic failures. The removal of the bollards, despite known risks, points to a lack of coordination and foresight by city officials. The 2019 Interfor report’s recommendations were ignored, and the failure to deploy temporary barriers during a high-profile event like New Year’s Eve in New Orleans—a city preparing for the Super Bowl and Mardi Gras—suggests a prioritization of optics over safety. The fact that Jabbar used an electric vehicle, a Ford F-150 Lightning, adds a new dimension to the threat, as its silent operation and rapid acceleration likely increased its lethality, a concern noted by the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
Moreover, Jabbar’s self-radicalization reflects a broader challenge in counterterrorism. The FBI’s initial suspicion of accomplices, later retracted, underscores the difficulty of tracking lone actors who are inspired by, but not directly connected to, terrorist groups. The use of peer-to-peer platforms like Turo and Airbnb, where Jabbar stayed in the St. Roch area, highlights how modern technology can facilitate anonymity for attackers, lowering operational barriers. This evolving tactic demands a reevaluation of how such platforms are monitored without infringing on privacy.
The attack also amplifies concerns about the vulnerability of “soft targets” like Bourbon Street. Devorah Margolin of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy told NPR that vehicular attacks are “quite hard to stop,” especially in areas where civilians are relaxed and enjoying themselves. The Department of Homeland Security has warned since 2010 that vehicle-ramming allows terrorists without access to explosives to carry out deadly attacks, a threat that has grown as ISIS and other groups promote such tactics.
Moving Forward: Resilience and Reflection
Bourbon Street reopened on January 2, with a large cross and flowers marking the site of the attack, where a vigil was held on January 4. The Sugar Bowl proceeded on January 2 with heightened security, as fans passed through checkpoints at the Superdome. New Orleans, a city known for its resilience, faces a long road to recovery, with the emotional scars of the attack lingering as it prepares for major events like the Super Bowl.
This tragedy underscores the need for better urban planning, improved counterterrorism strategies, and a serious reckoning with the impacts of climate change and societal alienation that can fuel radicalization. As one local, Jamal LeBlanc, told AP News, “We are a resilient people, we’re strong, we bounce back.” But resilience alone isn’t enough—systemic changes are needed to prevent such attacks in the future. What are your thoughts on how cities can better protect against such threats? Share your views in the comments below.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Did the Mafia Assassinate President John F. Kennedy?

This is a paper I did for Professor Vaccara a few years back regarding the assasination of President John F. Kennedy and the involvement of the New Orlean's mafia headed by Carlos Marcello:


Did the Mafia Assassinate President John F. Kennedy?©

Since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas many conspiracy theories have arisen.  Despite the Warren Commission pinpointing Lee Harvey Oswald as the one who assassinated John F. Kennedy; some believe that in reality the Mafia had a role in it.  Some believe the investigations conducted by the Warren Commission to be flawed and useless.  Not enough evidence was provided by the Warren Commission to indicate that Lee Harvey Osward was able to commit the act on his own. 

The books, The Mafia Murder of President John F. Kennedy by David E. Schein and Mafia Kingfish: Carlos Marcello and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy by John H. Davis present the idea that Mafia boss Carlos Marcello had a major role in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. 

In 1973, a reporter named Peter Noyes was the first to mention the Mafia as having involvement in the assassination of the President.  Law professor G. Robert Blakey presented the suggestion that President John F. Kennedy’s assassination was probably set up by the Mafia as a “hit.”  In 1978, he was the chief counsel for the house Assassinations Committee and used his talents to investigate the Mafia’s possible involvement.

At the time, John F. Kennedy’s brother, Robert Kennedy as United States Attorney General launched a war against organized crime in the 1960’s.  It is believed that the Mafia orchestrated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy for this very reason.  The Mafia does not like to be bothered by the government or any other social body.  It is a secret organization that conducts its business under the shadow of the Law. 

With the weight of the Attorney General on the Mafia, it is logical to assume that the Mafia “defended” itself by taking down the most powerful official in the world: The President of the United States of America.  By doing this, the Mafia would show that it is a force that cannot be taken lightly.  If need be, anyone will be killed in order to keep the Mafia up and running.

Carlos Marcello – whose real name is Calogero Minacore - was the mob boss in New Orleans and Texas.  He was a tomato sales man and real estate investor.  Marcello was arrested many times for numerous crimes.  Marcello is believed to have had a hatred for the Kennedy brothers.  Informants stated that Marcello told Edward Becker - who was a private investigator – that “if you cut a dog’s tail off it will still bite you until you cut its head off.” 

It is believed that Carlos Marcello was referring to Robert Kennedy as the “tail” and President John F. Kennedy as the “head.”   By having Robert Kennedy – a mere – “tail” killed, the “dog” or government will still continue to bite the Mafia.  Therefore, the “head” of the “dog” must be cut off.  The head of course is the leader of the Free world, the United States President.

However, the FBI after investigating Carlos Marcello, did not see him as a major crime boss to be concerned with.  This led the Warren Commission to state that the Mafia was not involved and that Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole perpetrator.  It is interesting to note that the weapon found at the scene was an Italian Carcano rifle.  Also, Lee Harvey Oswald was killed by Jack Ruby.  Lee Harvey Oswald denied the charges against him and said the Mafia used him as a “patsy,” or someone who takes the blame for a crime he/she did not commit. 

Carlos Marcello also confessed about Lee Harvey Oswald being a soldier of sorts.  He is quoted as saying, “He was my man.  He did what the hell I told him to do.”  Also, Jack Ruby, according to Carlos Marcello, owned a strip club that was in debt and that he helped him.  Jack Ruby in turn had to repay the “favor.” 

Other conspiracy theories suggest that maybe the United States government used the Mafia to assassinate President John F. Kennedy for political reasons.  It was also suggested that maybe Fidel Castro or the Soviets used the Mafia to get rid of John F. Kennedy because of his tension with the United States of America during the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis situations.  All seem to point to as the Mafia as the source of assassination of John F. Kennedy.

While in prison, the FBI taped Mafia boss Carlos Marcelo speaking of John F. Kennedy and voicing his frustrations against them.  Among many things said, one stands out the most:  “Yeah, I had the son of a bitch killed.  I’m glad I did.  I’m sorry I couldn't have done it myself!”  He was referring to President John F. Kennedy.       

These conspiracy theories all sound similar to conspiracies regarding September 11, 2001 or even Aliens from space which are brushed off as silly; however, it is very possible that the Mafia under Carlos Marcello had President John F. Kennedy assassinated.  While there is no concrete evidence to support the claim, there is circumstantial evidence that points to the Mafia and Carlos Marcello. 

Some might say that Carlos Marcello was claiming responsibility in order to boost his ego.  This is sometimes a tactic done by leaders of organizations that are known for violent activities.  Terrorist groups such as Hamas and Al- Qaida are known to take credit for any explosion or attack that takes place against the West.  Most likely, they had nothing to do with it but since they have the stage to present their voice, they take the opportunity to claim that the attack came from them. 

Is this what Carlos Marcello did?  Did he claim responsibility in order to present himself as boss so powerful that he could take down the leader of the free will with ease?  It is hard to say.  One must take into account his confessions while in prison.  I don’t think anyone who has the law bearing down on them will be boasting about having a President killed for no reason.             

The Mafia was being backed to a corner when Attorney General Robert Kennedy was investigating organized crime in America.  In order to continue existing, it would make sense to attack back in a way that will send a strong message.  This is not uncommon in the Mafia.  Giovanni Falcone who was a prosecuting magistrate in Italy was blown to smithereens on May 23, 1992.  He was killed because he went after the Mafia in an aggressive manner. 

Giovannie Falcone was a threat that needed to be eliminated.  When comparing Falcone’s demise with John F. Kennedy, one must not set aside the possibility that the Mafia in America attempted to take down the threat that was affecting their criminal institution.  Moreover, the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was killed before trial raises more red flags.  The Mafia in Italy is known for murdering witnesses or others who might reveal sensitive information regarding its operations.  In this respect, the Mafia is very meticulous with its identity and how it functions within Italian society. 

While no one knows for certain, I am convinced that the Mafia most likely was involved.  Fidel Castro or the Soviets could have been given the blame, but how would they have orchestrated such an attack?  They would have been able to assassinate numerous Presidents if it were either of them. 

Moreover, the FBI did not even suspect Carlos Marcello as being Mafioso, so if they were aloof to his activities, then how would they have known about any assassination attempt from foreign lands?  The Mafia assassinating President John F. Kennedy makes sense since they were able to mask their organization from the federal government.

The President of the United States of America is probably the most well guarded person possibly next to the Pope of the Catholic Church.  Only the Mafia has demonstrated the ability to creatively kill anyone they wanted.  Carlos Marcello could have easily developed a plan to assassinate the President.  He controlled the Mafia in Texas and knew the logistics of how to set up an assassination. 

There is no doubt that Mafia boss Carlos Marcello had President John F. Kennedy assassinated.  The courses of events that follow indicate this.  As stated before, circumstantial evidence is used in courts to determine innocence or guilt.  Everything that has happened shows the tactics that the Mafia is known for. 

Unfortunately, there were no surveillance cameras in the 1960’s like there are today so it is hard to actually show some kind of physical evidence.  Nevertheless, there is enough evidence to see that the Mafia did play a role in President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.  Carlos Marcello’s extreme hatred for the Kennedy brothers and his own confessions show intent.  When analyzing that with the other evidence and events surrounding Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby, one can see that the whole thing was a plot.   

Back then, security for the President was not as advanced as it is now.  Therefore, the Mafia had an easier time assassinating the President especially since the area he was assassinated at was in the territory of Carlos Marcello.




Bibliography:
The Mafia Murder of President John F. Kennedy by David E. Schein (April 1, 1989)  
Mafia Kingfish: Zebra Carlos Marcello and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy by John H. Davis: Signet (November 7, 1989)

Killing Kennedy: The End of Camelot by Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard: Henry Holt and Co.; First Edition edition (Oct 2, 2011)






  


  

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1629) Jesus (758) God (746) Bible (618) Atheism (400) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (347) Liturgy of the Word (322) Apologetics (294) Atheist (280) Science (238) Christianity (202) Theology (149) LGBT (148) Liturgy (139) Blessed Virgin Mary (126) Prayer (98) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Pope Benedict XVI (93) Philosophy (92) Traditionalists (83) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Vatican (76) Physics (74) Psychology (74) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) New York City (61) Christian (60) President Obama (59) Protestant (53) Vatican II (51) Health (49) Biology (48) Gospel (46) Politics (46) Women (44) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Death (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) NYPD (32) Pope John Paul II (32) priests (32) Priesthood (29) Space (28) Astrophysics (27) Eucharist (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Religious Freedom (27) Donald Trump (25) Evangelization (25) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Pentecostals (15) Sacraments (15) Angels (14) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Poverty (13) September 11 (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) academia (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evangelicals (9) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Death penalty (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)