Fourth Incriminating Planned Parenthood Video & Hacking Claims

A fourth video was just released by the Center for Medical Progress. The video was released amidst complaints from Planned Parenthood that its website was hacked and taken down by "Anti-Abortion Extremists."

It is interesting to note that CNN and other media outlets were not able to independently confirm this hack so it seems it may be a ploy by Planned Parenthood to deflect and increase donations by pretending to be the victim.  This is most likely the scenario due to the timing.  Planned Parenthood has been in existence for years and are we to believe that now is the time an "anti-abortion  extremist" is going to hack it?  It seems far-fetched. Then we see the timing in regards to the release of these videos.  It just does not seem kosher, so to speak.

If this is the case, then we can see clearly how Planned Parenthood is desperately trying to deflect from the attention it has been getting. This new video has Medical Director Savita Ginde discussing contract details, the prices of specific fetus body parts and how not to "get caught." The transactions are to be called 'research,' not 'business,' according to the video. Moreover, a discussion is had in regards to the fetal body having parts that are 'intact.'  More videos will be coming out and will hopefully bring politicians to push for the defunding of this evil organization and prosecution of those trafficking human fetus body parts which is illegal.








Source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWQuZMvcFA8&app=desktop

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-claims-database-website-hacked-by-anti-abortion-extremis

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/2015/07/29/id/659549/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/index.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/30/us-usa-plannedparenthood-cyberattack-idUSKCN0Q409120150730

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/deaconsbench/2015/07/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/

http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/30/planned-parenthood-hacking-sure-looks-like-an-orchestrated-pr-stunt/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/index.html

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/30/planned-parenthoods-hacked-website-looks-like-pr-stunt/

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/07/30/is-planned-parenthood-lying-about-its-web-site-being-hacked-possible-publicity-stunt/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?cmpid=cmty_twitter_fn

http://liveactionnews.org/planned-parenthood-baby-parts-scandal-grows-as-new-tape-released/

Atheist Scam II Ad Sense

https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/48182?hl=en#

Did you know, if you buy stuff from Amazon through my blog,I give all the commission to #Oxfam? http://t.co/WGGDw82IyZ #BeHumankind
— RosaRubicondior (@RosaReerected) November 1, 2013

Did you know, if you buy stuff from Amazon through my blog, all commission will go to #Oxfam and it costs you nothing extra. #BeHumankind
— RosaRubicondior (@RosaReerected) November 1, 2013

Please do not visit or click on ads on this scammer's website.  This person is in clear violation of Google's Adsense rules which states not to promote/encourage clicking or purchasing while using their program on a blog in order to increase funds.  See the link above (under the screen capture).

This person is a scammer and is taking advantage of atheists and others.  I have already contacted Google regarding this person's abuse of their adsense program.  I invite you to do the same.  

 

Atheist Scam Alert

Please be aware of fraudulent activity on Twitter claiming to donate money to Oxfam.  Oxfam collects no such donations from Twitter accounts and/or blogs.  I have notified them of this activity and they are currently investigating and will take legal action against atheists or anyone using their organization's name to commit fraud.

Please report tweets attempting to represent Oxfam by soliciting donations to: Oxfam, Twitter support and your local law officials.

Did you know, if you buy stuff from Amazon through my blog, all commission will go to #Oxfam and it costs you nothing extra. #BeHumankind
— RosaRubicondior (@RosaReerected) October 29, 2013

Here is the email I received:

Oct 25 (4 days ago)


Dear Michael

Thank you for your email and for letting us know about your concerns regarding this Twitter user.

I have forwarded your email to a team to investigate this further and decide if and what action needs to be taken.

Thank you again for letting us know, please do let me know if you have any other questions and I will be happy to help.

With best wishes

(Name removed for privacy)
 Supporter Relations
 Oxfam GB
 Direct tel: +44 (0)300 200 1300
 Switchboard tel: +44 (0)300 200 1292
 E-mail: enquiries@oxfam.org.uk
 Website: http://www.oxfam.org.uk

 P.S. We would love to hear what you think. Whether it is good, bad or indifferent, knowing what our supporters think is vital to us if we are going to continue to improve how we communicate to the people who make our work possible. The survey will take less than 2 minutes to complete and any information that you provide will be anonymous and confidential. http://qnr.surveyshack.com/s/18jfGgAPhbD.Xe3

Screen shots.   I had to black out the person's name at her request as well as other private information (gmail contacts etc)

First response

My response

After a few emails, their conclusion

Second to last email

My last email

Reply to Jeff Catholicgadfly's inquiry
https://twitter.com/CatholicGadfly/status/530235399399288832

UPDATE 11/7/14

After much pressure, "Rosa Rubicondior" finally donated the monies to Oxfam today.  Oxfam sent Catholicgadfly this tweet.

@CatholicGadfly @Ellif_DWulfe @beebearninja @FreeAtheism Hi, We have confirmed that all donations made from the Rosa blog have been received
— Oxfam (@oxfamgb) November 7, 2014

Based on the wording (verb tense), it is understood that "Rosa Rubicondior" just made the donations.  The words "have been received" is present prefect tense meaning it is an action that occurred in the present-past.  For example, Let's say I just wrote a blog.  The "just wrote" means that I wrote it, it happened, but it happened recently, so it tells us of an action that happened already (past) but was recent (in the present).  So by Oxfam stating, "have been received" they are saying that the donations were sent already, but now in the present, not a year ago or long ago in the past.


See this video and links for more information:



http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/grammar/tenses.html
http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/tenses/present_perfect.htm
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/en/english-grammar/verbs/present-tense/present-perfect
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/601/01/



What is hilarious is that one of "Rosa's" sock puppets "ellif_dwulf" sent the englishpage.com to Catholicgadfly.  It was tweeted as proof that the donations were made long ago contradicting Catholicgadfly's tweet that "have been" is present-past.  Well the link ellif sent actually proves Catholicgadfly corrrect! haha

See this funny exchange:

@CatholicGadfly http://t.co/TtFXXvXz4Q "unspecfied time" @FreeAtheism @DarthNihilus1
— Ellif D'Wulf (@Ellif_DWulfe) November 7, 2014

Lol! That link agrees with me, did you even read it? @Ellif_DWulfe @FreeAtheism @DarthNihilus1 pic.twitter.com/1ZdLPM5uH1
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 7, 2014

YOU CANNOT use the Present Perfect with ... yesterday, ONE YEAR AGO, LAST WEEK. @Ellif_DWulfe @FreeAtheism @DarthNihilus1
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 7, 2014

"Rosa" supposedly donated last year correct? Well Oxfam by using "have been" disputes this. @Ellif_DWulfe @FreeAtheism @DarthNihilus1
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 7, 2014

Funny I have to give a British kid lessons on the language his people created.. @Ellif_DWulfe @beebearninja @testisfidelis @FreeAtheism
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 7, 2014

Ironically, the tweet from OxfamGB was sent just hours after Catholicgadfly filed a report to the American branch of Oxfam reporting "Paul" for misinformation.  See here:

Correct? I have to report their misinformation. @Ellif_DWulfe @beebearninja @FreeAtheism pic.twitter.com/oXBo2SDbc4
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 6, 2014

Note: The emails posted above are valid and accurate to the date they were received.  We were told that "Rosa Rubicondior" and her blog DID NOT donate at the time the emails were sent.  Well now she has donated today and I applaud her for finally handing in the money to Oxfam which she so proudly claimed she had done a year ago.  It took a year, but we forced her to donate it.  

The report Catholicgadfly filed obviously pushed "Rosa Rubicondior" to act quickly and donate the money before the dirt hit the fan, so to speak.  It also forced Oxfamgb to actually tweet this confirmation showing the donations were made in the present-perfect tense.  

My report forced Oxfam to tweet us! Ever wonder how they got my account?? @Ellif_DWulfe @beebearninja @testisfidelis @FreeAtheism
— Jeff T. Follon MA. (@CatholicGadfly) November 7, 2014

This was my intention all along. I wanted all to see that we cannot trust people claiming to be a middle man in order to collect money and donate to any organization. The pressure from the tweets, this blog post and the atheists who were manipulated into pursuing this case forced "Rosa Rubicondior" to do the right thing and donate.  

I will keep this post up as a testament to the fraud "Rosa Rubicondior" is capable of committed just in case she tries to collect money from others in order to "donate." 

Let's not forget the AdSense scam now: see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2013/11/atheist-scam-ii-ad-sense.html