Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Twitter replies




Here are some tweets I received that I have replied to here:




If you say so.  Any atheist with an ounce of intellectual confidence would take any challenge and obviously would not fear a 'rock.'





I never spam anyone.






It will not get suspended again.  Twitter is aware of the situation and others are constantly reporting every tweet that mentions me.





Rosa, why are you so obesessed with me?  You lost - get over it.





I know the difference that is why I questioned you regarding it.  You have yet to answer.






Rosa, find a hobby.  You lost the debate so move on.  Stop trying to get blog hits at my expense.  I put you on the twitter map.  :)




Rosa, again... get a hobby.  No one will listen to you.  I have people monitoring every tweet mentioning me and they are being reported constantly so watch what you write.





Not at all.   Please provide evidence of this claim.






If that were true, why would I constantly invite atheists to debate me?  Your naivete never ceases to fail in impression.






This would not happen if you were not so paranoid.






Where is your proof that they do not exist?  There is proof that God exists.  I have offered to show this during debates but twitter atheists run away.





Where is your evidence to support that the "book" is 2000 years of fairy tales?  Your hyperbolic statements reflect your ignorance.






He will come when least expected.





Really?  APA means American Psychological Association.  Atheist and their ignorance... ugh





And intelligence hopefully entered the narrow vacuum 




And you call yourself a follower of Christ?  You sir are a hypocrite.




I do recall Jesus stating not to judge anyone.  Perhaps your sect does not read this part of the Gospel.




Jail?  What are you ranting about.  Your reports are meaningless.





More judgment?  Every tweet of yours offends Christ.




Keep your warnings to yourself.  Worry about your salvation which is questionable.





Twitter pays no mind to such accusations.  Twitter operates on automatic algorithmic coding.




No.  I will pull them when you report the abuse and/or call on Rosa Rubicondior to remove any mention of this child.  Until then, the links will remain on my blog until the second coming of Christ.






Where is your evidence for your claim that it is fiction?  Hyperbolic statements are not enough.







I invited you to discuss it on my blog and you refused.  Instead you began calling me a racist and went off on a rant.








Not at all.  Why do you think twitter suspended that account and the others he uses?   Abuse is not legal.





I am not too sure what you are asking.  I believe you're trying to ask why Lot's wife died while Lot did not after trying to present his daughters to the homosexuals of Sodom and Gomorrah, correct?

Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt because she looked back at the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah while both were being destroyed.  Her inner longing for the life of sin that was present in those cities was what got her into trouble.  In other words, when we choose God we repent.  We are supposed to turn away from our former selves and put on a new better self, so to speak.  Lot's wife did not do this.  She still wanted to live the "vida loca" that Sodom and Gomorrah offered, hence, she looked back as if being nostalgic.

Lot offered his daughters to the men in an attempt to choose the lesser of two evils.  It is not uncommon for fathers to "give away" daughters in many cultures, particularly those of the east.  He was not "pimpin/shaggin" his daughters.  Even in the western culture, the father gives away the bride during weddings.



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="272102860513234944"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/dave_was_here">dave_was_here</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a>I like this. Simple request.</p>&mdash; Nostrawtostirdrink (@Nostradamnisuck) <a href="https://twitter.com/Nostradamnisuck/status/272103216202784769" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:23:56+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Here is the link: http://rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com/2012/11/dave-vs-sacerdotus.html






<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Oh, and you must provide scientific evidence to support your claims. All of them. @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099514196824065" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:09:14+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Why resort to scientism?   I can and will provide evidence as long as you are seriously objective about it and will provide the same to prove there is no God.




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Does your god have a plan? Does your god answer prayers? @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099326061342720" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:08:29+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>




God does have a plan and does answer prayers.




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Is your god all-knowing, all-powerful, ever-present, perfect and good? @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099215453323264" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:08:02+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Yes.



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> You want me to school you again? Fine. Let's start with exactly what your god is. @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272098905989189632" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:06:49+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



You have never schooled me.  Let's continue the discussion here: http://rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com/2012/11/dave-vs-sacerdotus.html




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Provide scientific evidence your god exists, then answer the following: @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099054396248064" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:07:24+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Matter cannot produce information.  Information exists only by means of an intelligent sender.   Matter contains information, therefore, there must be an intelligent sender since matter cannot produce it on its own.
    

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.

Labels

Catholic Church (473) God (320) Atheism (252) Jesus (217) Jesus Christ (215) Bible (180) Pope Francis (166) Atheist (153) LGBT (132) Science (123) Liturgy of the Word (106) Christianity (88) Rosa Rubicondior (77) Pope Benedict XVI (73) Abortion (71) Gay (66) Prayer (56) President Obama (56) Physics (46) Philosophy (43) Vatican (39) Christian (38) Christmas (34) Blessed Virgin Mary (33) New York City (33) Psychology (32) Women (29) Biology (28) Liturgy (28) Politics (28) Baseball (26) Religious Freedom (24) Pope John Paul II (21) Space (21) Holy Eucharist (19) NYPD (19) Pro Abortion (19) Supreme Court (19) priests (19) Evil (18) Child Abuse (17) Pro Choice (17) Donald Trump (16) Evangelization (16) First Amendment (16) Police (16) Protestant (16) Death (14) Health (14) Astrophysics (13) Christ (13) Marriage (12) Priesthood (12) Blog (11) Pedophilia (11) Racism (11) Illegal Immigrants (10) Poverty (10) Apologetics (9) Muslims (9) Theology (9) Vatican II (9) Autism (8) Divine Mercy (8) Human Rights (8) Personhood (8) September 11 (8) Big Bang Theory (7) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Easter Sunday (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) Evidence (7) Gender Theory (7) Gospel (7) Jewish (7) academia (7) Barack Obama (6) Humanism (6) Morality (6) Pentecostals (6) Traditionalists (6) Babies (5) Cognitive Psychology (5) Cyber Bullying (5) NY Yankees (5) Spiritual Life (5) The Walking Dead (5) Angels (4) CUNY (4) Donations (4) Ephebophilia (4) Eucharist (4) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (4) Holy Trinity (4) Podcast (4) Pope Pius XII (4) Evangelicals (3) Hispanics (3) Massimo Pigliucci (3) Pluto (3) Pope John XXIII (3) Sacraments (3) Baby Jesus (2) Dan Arel (2) Death penalty (2) Encyclical (2) Founding Fathers (2) Freeatheism (2) Hell (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Plenary Indulgence (2) Catholic Bloggers (1) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Eastern Orthodox (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1) Pope Paul VI (1)