Twitter replies

Here are some tweets I received that I have replied to here:

@sacerdotus #atheists wont waste their time trying 2 talk sense 2 a rock, we hav logical things 2 do. #atheistrollcall #atheism
— Critical Thinker (@Aspentroll) October 3, 2012

If you say so.  Any atheist with an ounce of intellectual confidence would take any challenge and obviously would not fear a 'rock.'

RT @jasonalanwriter He is mildly entertaining, at least. @wizardoftodd @sacerdotus ◄- until he starts spamming people who disagree with him!
— MsGrumpy (@MsGrumpy) October 2, 2012

I never spam anyone.

I wonder how long @sacerdotus is able to keep his account open before it is suspended again. We should start a pool. #atheist #atheism
— Todd Lusk (@wizardoftodd) October 2, 2012

It will not get suspended again.  Twitter is aware of the situation and others are constantly reporting every tweet that mentions me.

@joeunseen It's #Sadloser sociopath @sacerdotus still raging at the world from his bedroom I'm afraid. #Atheism #ForNormalPeople
— Rosa Rubicondior (@RosaRubicondior) October 4, 2012

Rosa, why are you so obesessed with me?  You lost - get over it.

RT @heatherr_parker :"@sacerdotus Please learn the difference between juridical and natural personhood, and then get back to me. " #atheism
— Deep Search (@DeepSearch17) September 28, 2012

I know the difference that is why I questioned you regarding it.  You have yet to answer.

Imagine what world would be like if we allowed religious people like @sacerdotus anywhere near political power again... #Atheism #Secularism
— Rosa Rubicondior (@RosaRubicondior) September 28, 2012

Rosa, find a hobby.  You lost the debate so move on.  Stop trying to get blog hits at my expense.  I put you on the twitter map.  :)

If anyone is being abused by @sacerdotus or his various sock-puppet accounts, here is the complaint page: bit.ly/kT7YBt#Atheism
— Rosa Rubicondior (@RosaRubicondior) September 28, 2012   

Rosa, again... get a hobby.  No one will listen to you.  I have people monitoring every tweet mentioning me and they are being reported constantly so watch what you write.

So @sacerdotus is apparently in favor of forcible kidney harvesting should someone need a kidney to live. It's about #BODYAUTONOMY STUPID.
— Assassin Grrrl (@AssassinGrl) September 28, 2012  

Not at all.   Please provide evidence of this claim.

RT @sacerdotus: @msgrumpy @ascotsmanabroad What a #copout" ◄-- says the man too scared of debating atheists on twitter #coward
— MsGrumpy (@MsGrumpy) September 26, 2012  

If that were true, why would I constantly invite atheists to debate me?  Your naivete never ceases to fail in impression.

My apologies to@johnrichardowen I confused your account with a false account set up by a twitter stalker @sacerdotus a religious nut,sorry
— Ascot Abroad+ (@ascotsmanabroad) September 26, 2012  

This would not happen if you were not so paranoid.

Neither, none proven to exist >> RT @sacerdotus: Is #God dead or dying?po.st/99krrc#atheism #atheist #catholic #teamJesus #god
— James of the Lepus (@NullGodPointer) September 26, 2012  

Where is your proof that they do not exist?  There is proof that God exists.  I have offered to show this during debates but twitter atheists run away.

@sacerdotus absolute BS. Your book of 2000 year old fairytales cannot be used to impose your will on people who don't believe in it.
— karl meyer (@karlmeyer) October 3, 2012  

Where is your evidence to support that the "book" is 2000 years of fairy tales?  Your hyperbolic statements reflect your ignorance.

@allocutus @bronxbomber777 @msgrumpy @god_sucks @sacerdotus 2000+ years and counting!Got over it and move on, he ain't coming.
— Gary C (@earthforce_1) September 29, 2012  

He will come when least expected.

@sacerdotus @allocutus @msgrumpy @god_sucks @bronxbomber777 @madameramotswe @jaxzohn APAAtheistsPrettyAwesome
— Iron Atheist (@IronAtheist) September 26, 2012  

Really?  APA means American Psychological Association.  Atheist and their ignorance... ugh

.@masonchain reading @sacerdotus rots the mind right out of your head. @msgrumpy @bronxbomber777 @madameramotswe @jaxzohn
— Golmer Flagellate (@Golmer) September 26, 2012  

And intelligence hopefully entered the narrow vacuum 

@sacerdotus again..just a childish, wannabe failed priest who's only audience is fake accounts on twitter. Truly sad..I will pray for you
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

And you call yourself a follower of Christ?  You sir are a hypocrite.

@sacerdotus you are SO far from serving God that unless you stop your condemnation and childish tactics, you will never be one with god>>
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

I do recall Jesus stating not to judge anyone.  Perhaps your sect does not read this part of the Gospel.

@sacerdotus happened..which it hasn't..why am I not in jail yet? You have been reported, again, and your account will be list..again
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012

Jail?  What are you ranting about.  Your reports are meaningless.

@sacerdotus so sad you are..defame a Christian for "supporting child abuse" because I simply didn't agree with you. If this child abuse has>
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

More judgment?  Every tweet of yours offends Christ.

@sacerdotus ok...I warned you. You should really grow up little boy
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

Keep your warnings to yourself.  Worry about your salvation which is questionable.

@sacerdotus no.tell the truth. I reported you for defamation of character and they suspended your account. I suggest you "play" by the rules
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

Twitter pays no mind to such accusations.  Twitter operates on automatic algorithmic coding.

@sacerdotus r u going to pull the links to this off twitter or do I need to report you again..it's up to you. I'd like to stop this nonsense
— Andrew (@AndrewWidener) October 2, 2012  

No.  I will pull them when you report the abuse and/or call on Rosa Rubicondior to remove any mention of this child.  Until then, the links will remain on my blog until the second coming of Christ.

@benincitizen @sacerdotus ive read the entire book. It does have some nice ideas...but it is, as you said, fiction. Too much hate
— KilgoreTrout43 (@kilgoretrout43) November 5, 2012

Where is your evidence for your claim that it is fiction?  Hyperbolic statements are not enough.

Christian still won't respond to Lot question. Still wants hits on blog though. #christianlogic.@sacerdotus
— Joshua Idehen (@BeninCitizen) November 4, 2012

I invited you to discuss it on my blog and you refused.  Instead you began calling me a racist and went off on a rant.

@sacerdotus no offense, but ur being a coward. 3% of last 100 twts from @sacerdotass had u in them. Parody is legal. This is social media.
— Brian Fuller (@TheBrianFuller) November 4, 2012

Not at all.  Why do you think twitter suspended that account and the others he uses?   Abuse is not legal.

@sacerdotus So here's the Q: Explain how Gandalf the Holy cld kill Lot's wife 4 looking over shoulder but not Lot 4 pimpin/shaggin daughters
— Joshua Idehen (@BeninCitizen) November 4, 2012

I am not too sure what you are asking.  I believe you're trying to ask why Lot's wife died while Lot did not after trying to present his daughters to the homosexuals of Sodom and Gomorrah, correct?

Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt because she looked back at the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah while both were being destroyed.  Her inner longing for the life of sin that was present in those cities was what got her into trouble.  In other words, when we choose God we repent.  We are supposed to turn away from our former selves and put on a new better self, so to speak.  Lot's wife did not do this.  She still wanted to live the "vida loca" that Sodom and Gomorrah offered, hence, she looked back as if being nostalgic.

Lot offered his daughters to the men in an attempt to choose the lesser of two evils.  It is not uncommon for fathers to "give away" daughters in many cultures, particularly those of the east.  He was not "pimpin/shaggin" his daughters.  Even in the western culture, the father gives away the bride during weddings.



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="272102860513234944"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/dave_was_here">dave_was_here</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a>I like this. Simple request.</p>&mdash; Nostrawtostirdrink (@Nostradamnisuck) <a href="https://twitter.com/Nostradamnisuck/status/272103216202784769" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:23:56+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Here is the link: http://rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com/2012/11/dave-vs-sacerdotus.html






<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Oh, and you must provide scientific evidence to support your claims. All of them. @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099514196824065" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:09:14+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Why resort to scientism?   I can and will provide evidence as long as you are seriously objective about it and will provide the same to prove there is no God.




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Does your god have a plan? Does your god answer prayers? @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099326061342720" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:08:29+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>




God does have a plan and does answer prayers.




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Is your god all-knowing, all-powerful, ever-present, perfect and good? @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099215453323264" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:08:02+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Yes.



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> You want me to school you again? Fine. Let's start with exactly what your god is. @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272098905989189632" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:06:49+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



You have never schooled me.  Let's continue the discussion here: http://rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com/2012/11/dave-vs-sacerdotus.html




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center" data-in-reply-to="271805765323485184"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/sacerdotus">sacerdotus</a> Provide scientific evidence your god exists, then answer the following: @<a href="https://twitter.com/nostradamnisuck">nostradamnisuck</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/justfole">justfole</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/rosarubicondior">rosarubicondior</a></p>&mdash; Dave (@Dave_was_here) <a href="https://twitter.com/Dave_was_here/status/272099054396248064" data-datetime="2012-11-23T22:07:24+00:00">November 23, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Matter cannot produce information.  Information exists only by means of an intelligent sender.   Matter contains information, therefore, there must be an intelligent sender since matter cannot produce it on its own.