Eric Dickerson's Ignorant Rant: Telling Bad Bunny to "Keep His Ass in Puerto Rico"

Eric Dickerson's Ignorant Rant: Telling Bad Bunny to "Keep His Ass in Puerto Rico"

In a viral video interview captured by TMZ at Los Angeles International Airport on October 7, 2025, NFL Hall of Famer Eric Dickerson unleashed a tirade against Bad Bunny, the Puerto Rican global superstar headlining the Super Bowl LX halftime show in February 2026. Dickerson, a legendary running back who holds the single-season rushing record with 2,105 yards set in 1984 while playing for the Los Angeles Rams, expressed outrage over reports of Bad Bunny's criticisms of U.S. policies, particularly immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. "I'm from the U.S.," Dickerson declared emphatically. "I love my country. And if you don't like the United States, just get your ass out of here and don't come over here." When informed that Bad Bunny hails from Puerto Rico, Dickerson responded without missing a beat: "Keep his ass in Puerto Rico!" Even after being reminded that Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory, he doubled down, saying, "I know Puerto Rico is part of the U.S., but it's not the U.S. That's the way I look at it. That's the way I feel." This statement, while rooted in Dickerson's professed patriotism, is not just inflammatory—it's profoundly stupid, factually bankrupt, and emblematic of a deep-seated ignorance about Puerto Rico's legal and historical ties to the United States. By framing Puerto Rico as some foreign "other" to which Bad Bunny should retreat, Dickerson reveals a shocking misunderstanding of basic American civics, one that perpetuates harmful stereotypes and undermines the very unity he claims to cherish.

Dickerson's comments came amid broader backlash to the NFL's announcement of Bad Bunny (real name Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio) as the halftime performer at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, California. The 31-year-old artist, whose genre-blending reggaeton and Latin trap have made him Spotify's most-streamed artist three years running, has been vocal about social issues, including Puerto Rico's colonial status and U.S. immigration policies. In a September 2025 interview with i-D magazine, Bad Bunny explained skipping U.S. tour dates due to concerns over ICE raids targeting his fans, stating, "There were many reasons why I didn’t show up in the U.S., and none of them were out of hate... But there was the issue of—like, fcking ICE could be outside [my concert]." Dickerson, admitting he had "heard some stuff" about these views but hadn't verified them, lumped this into "political crap" the NFL allegedly favors, suggesting Bad Bunny's selection was another example of the league's progressive leanings. Yet, in his fervor to defend "his country," Dickerson exposed a glaring blind spot: Puerto Rico is part of the United States, and Bad Bunny is every bit the American citizen Dickerson himself is. Telling a U.S. citizen to "go back" to a U.S. territory is as absurd as instructing a Californian to return to California if they critique federal policy—it's not deportation; it's displacement within one's own nation.

This isn't mere hyperbole; it's a factual error that highlights systemic educational gaps about U.S. territories. A 2017 Economist/YouGov poll found that only 54% of Americans correctly identified Puerto Ricans as U.S. citizens, a statistic that hasn't improved significantly in the years since. Dickerson's rant, which quickly amassed millions of views on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok, sparked immediate backlash. Users mocked him for the geographical faux pas, with one viral post quipping, "Someone tell braindead Eric Dickerson Puerto Rico is part of the US so Bad Bunny is American." Another X user lamented, "NOW THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS THAT ERIC DICKERSON IS AN A. TOLD BAD BUNNY TO STAY IN HIS 'OWN' COUNTRY. DOES HE KNOW WHAT COUNTRY PUERTO RICO IS IN?" The irony is palpable: a man who broke barriers as one of the first Black players to rush for over 2,000 yards in a season, facing racism and physical brutality on the field, now casually otherizes fellow Americans based on birthplace.

To unpack why Dickerson's statement is so egregiously stupid, we must delve into the historical and legal foundations of Puerto Rico's status. This isn't abstract trivia; it's the bedrock of American identity that renders his xenophobic jab nonsensical. Puerto Rico's journey into the U.S. fold began not with consent but conquest, a chapter of empire-building that Dickerson, as a product of the American sports-industrial complex, might appreciate for its competitive ferocity but should recognize for its enduring complexities.

 The Imperial Origins: From Spanish Colony to American Possession

Puerto Rico's story as a U.S. territory traces back to the Spanish-American War of 1898, a brief but pivotal conflict that marked the United States' emergence as a global power. Prior to the war, Puerto Rico had been under Spanish rule since Christopher Columbus claimed it in 1493, enduring centuries of colonial exploitation that decimated the indigenous Taíno population through disease, enslavement, and violence. By the late 19th century, Puerto Ricans were agitating for autonomy or independence, with figures like Ramón Emeterio Betances founding the Puerto Rican Revolutionary Committee in 1867.

The war itself was sparked by the explosion of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor on February 15, 1898—an event still debated as accident or sabotage—and escalating tensions over Cuba's independence struggle. President William McKinley, under pressure from expansionist "yellow journalists" like William Randolph Hearst, declared war on Spain in April. U.S. forces, including future Rough Rider Theodore Roosevelt, swiftly captured Puerto Rico in a bloodless invasion led by General Nelson A. Miles, who landed at Guánica on July 25. Miles proclaimed the island "liberated" from Spanish "tyranny," but this was liberation in name only; it exchanged one colonial master for another.

The war's end was sealed by the Treaty of Paris, signed on December 10, 1898, in the shadow of Versailles. Under Article II, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines to the United States for $20 million, while Cuba gained nominal independence (though under the Platt Amendment's thumb). The treaty's text is unambiguous: "Spain will cede to the United States the island of Puerto Rico and its dependencies." No plebiscite was held; 968,000 Puerto Ricans had no say in their fate. This acquisition was justified under the mantle of Manifest Destiny, with Senator Albert Beveridge thundering in Congress that "the power that rules the Pacific... is the power that rules the world," positioning Puerto Rico as a strategic Caribbean foothold.

Initial U.S. administration was military, under the Division of Territories and Insular Affairs. The Foraker Act of 1900 formalized civilian governance, establishing a governor appointed by the president and a bicameral legislature with limited powers—the upper house also appointed, the lower elected but subject to veto. Tariffs were imposed, crippling local industries like sugar, and English was mandated in schools, alienating a Spanish-speaking populace. Protests erupted, including the 1899 Intentona de Yauco uprising, swiftly quashed. These early years sowed seeds of resentment, as Puerto Ricans were treated as colonial subjects rather than citizens, paying federal taxes without representation—a grievance immortalized in the island's non-voting delegate to Congress.

The Insular Cases, a series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions from 1901 to 1922, codified this second-class status. In Downes v. Bidwell (1901), Justice Edward Douglass White articulated the doctrine of "incorporation," distinguishing between "incorporated" territories (destined for statehood, like Hawaii) and "unincorporated" ones (permanent possessions, like Puerto Rico). The Court held that the full Constitution does not apply ex proprio vigore (of its own force) to unincorporated territories, allowing Congress plenary power under the Territory Clause (Article IV, Section 3). This meant Puerto Ricans enjoyed fundamental rights like due process but lacked others, such as trial by jury in civil cases or uniform tariff protections. Justice White's infamous "law of silence" analogy likened territories to "the Chinaman who came here not to enjoy our institutions but to trade" or "the African slave who was brought here not to enjoy our liberties but to labor." Racist undertones were explicit; the cases reflected anxieties about incorporating "alien races" unfit for self-governance.

Dickerson's casual dismissal—"it's not the U.S."—echoes this unincorporated stigma, but even in 1901, the Court affirmed Puerto Rico as "belonging to the United States." To call it otherwise today is willful blindness, ignoring how these cases, while discriminatory, embedded the island irrevocably in the American legal fabric. Over a century later, Puerto Rico remains unincorporated, fueling debates over statehood, independence, or enhanced commonwealth status. Five referenda since 1967 have leaned toward statehood (52% in 2020), but Congress has stalled, leaving 3.2 million residents in limbo—paying Social Security and Medicare taxes without full voting rights. Dickerson's rant, then, doesn't just err factually; it revives the colonial othering that Puerto Ricans have resisted for generations.

 The Birth of Citizenship: The Jones-Shafroth Act of 1917

If the Treaty of Paris marked acquisition, the Jones-Shafroth Act of 1917 was the pivotal grant of belonging, bestowing U.S. citizenship on Puerto Ricans and shattering any pretense of foreignness. Officially the Organic Act of Puerto Rico, this legislation—sponsored by Senator John Jones and Representative William Jones, both Indiana Democrats—replaced the Foraker Act's framework with a more democratic one. Signed by President Woodrow Wilson on March 2, 1917, amid World War I preparations, it responded to Puerto Rican lobbying and U.S. strategic needs: loyal citizens would bolster defenses against German submarines in the Atlantic.

Section 5 is the cornerstone: "All citizens of Porto Rico [the archaic spelling] ... shall be deemed and held to be citizens of the United States." This statutory citizenship applies to all born in Puerto Rico after April 11, 1899 (retroactively covering those under U.S. rule), and is inheritable. Unlike naturalization, it's birthright, equivalent to jus soli citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment for those born in states. The act also created a bicameral legislature with an elected Senate and House, a presidentially appointed governor (until 1948), and a local bill of rights mirroring the U.S. one, including freedoms of speech, assembly, and religion.

Motivations were mixed. Geopolitically, citizenship ensured allegiance during wartime; the U.S. drafted 18,000 Puerto Ricans into the Army, forming the 65th Infantry Regiment ("Borinqueneers"), who fought valiantly in World War I and II. Economically, it facilitated labor migration: over 2 million Puerto Ricans now live stateside, powering industries from New York's garment factories to Florida's agriculture. But it wasn't altruism; as historian Pedro A. Cabán notes, it "assimilated Puerto Rico without incorporating it," granting passports while denying votes.

The act's passage followed intense advocacy. The Puerto Rican Nationalist Party, founded in 1917 by Pedro Albizu Campos, decried it as a ploy for "cannon fodder," but most accepted it pragmatically. Challenges arose: in Balzac v. Porto Rico (1922), the Supreme Court ruled citizenship doesn't extend full constitutional protections, upholding the unincorporated status. Yet, the Nationality Act of 1940 and Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 reaffirmed it, classifying Puerto Ricans as "nationals and citizens" immune to deportation. Bad Bunny, born in Vega Baja in 1994, is thus a natural-born U.S. citizen, free to critique policies from Miami to San Juan without fear of exile.

Dickerson's "stay in your country" line crumbles here. Puerto Rico isn't a sovereign nation; it's a territory under Article IV, subject to federal supremacy. Bad Bunny holds a U.S. passport, pays U.S. taxes on worldwide income if residing stateside, and enjoys Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment protections. Telling him to "go back" implies he's an immigrant intruder, echoing the nativism that targeted Puerto Rican migrants in the 1950s "Nuyorican" era, when Operation Bootstrap lured workers only to face redlining and "No Dogs or Puerto Ricans" signs.

 Legal Protections and Modern Affirmations

Post-1917 laws have woven Puerto Rico tighter into the U.S. tapestry. The Federal Relations Act of 1950, tied to Public Law 600, allowed Puerto Rico to draft its own constitution in 1952, establishing the "commonwealth" (Estado Libre Asociado) status. This "in effect" plebiscite granted local self-rule—electing governors like Luis Muñoz Marín, the first in 1952—while ceding foreign affairs, defense, and citizenship to Washington. The Supreme Court in Examining Board v. Flores de Otero (1976) struck down territorial discrimination, applying equal protection to Puerto Ricans in professions. More recently, the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) of 2016 imposed a fiscal board after Hurricane Maria's $90 billion devastation, criticized as neocolonial but underscoring federal responsibility.

Citizenship rights are robust: Puerto Ricans serve in Congress (Resident Commissioner Jenniffer González-Colón), the military (over 200,000 veterans), and judiciary (Justice Sonia Sotomayor). They vote in primaries, own guns under federal law, and access Medicare/Medicaid. Yet anomalies persist—no Electoral College votes, no full congressional representation—fueling "taxation without representation" cries. Dickerson's distinction—"part of the U.S., but not the U.S."—mirrors this limbo but ignores that it's American limbo. As the Court ruled in Igartúa-De La Rosa v. United States (2008), while non-voting, Puerto Ricans are "fully American."

 Cultural Contributions and the Absurdity of Exclusion

Beyond law, Puerto Rico's Americanness shines in culture. Bad Bunny embodies this: his albums Un Verano Sin Ti (2022) and Nadie Sabe Lo Que Va a Pasar Mañana (2023) topped Billboard, blending Spanish lyrics with U.S. hip-hop influences. He's collaborated with Drake and performed at Coachella, exporting "Borikén" pride globally. Telling him to "keep his ass in Puerto Rico" dismisses icons like Roberto Clemente (Pittsburgh Pirates legend, humanitarian), Rita Moreno (EGOT winner), and Lin-Manuel Miranda (Hamilton creator), all Puerto Ricans who enriched the mainland.

Dickerson's ignorance stings more from a Black American lens. As a trailblazer in the NFL's post-integration era, he endured slurs and spikes; Puerto Ricans faced similar "spic" epithets during the 1970s fiscal crisis. Both groups challenge the "real American" myth. X reactions highlighted this: "Eric Dickerson doesn’t have a clue about what Bad Bunny [stands] for... nor does he know that Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory." Another: "Does Eric Dickerson know that Puerto Rico is in the U.S.? Would he deny the Rolling Stones...?"

 Broader Implications: Ignorance as Cultural Amnesia

Dickerson's gaffe isn't isolated; it's symptomatic. Post-Maria neglect—FEMA's slow aid, PROMESA's austerity—exposed federal indifference, with 3,000 excess deaths. Trump's paper towels toss in 2017 epitomized this. Bad Bunny's ICE critiques stem from such realities: raids in Ponce in June 2025, documented in his Instagram live, where he fumed, "Sons of bhes, instead of leaving the people alone." Dickerson, ignoring this, reduces it to anti-Americanism.

The rant amplifies calls for education. Curricula often gloss over territories, treating them as footnotes. Initiatives like the Boricua Popular University push back, but mainstream awareness lags. In sports, where Dickerson shone, Puerto Rican stars like Carlos Beltrán remind us of shared glory.

 Conclusion: Patriotism Without Prejudice

Eric Dickerson's command for Bad Bunny to "keep his ass in Puerto Rico" is stupid because it defies history and law: Puerto Rico has been American since 1898, its people citizens since 1917, their rights enshrined in statutes and courts. It's a statement born of unchecked bias, mistaking cultural difference for disloyalty. Bad Bunny isn't fleeing to a foreign shore; he's performing in the heart of the nation he critiques to improve. True patriotism embraces dissent, not exile. Dickerson, a gridiron great, could learn from the Borinqueneers' valor or Clemente's sacrifice. Instead, his words alienate, reminding us that ignorance, not politics, is the real "crap" dividing America. As Bad Bunny raps in "El Apagón," "Pa' que tú me digas que yo no soy de aquí" (So you can tell me I'm not from here)—but he is, unequivocally.

 

 Sources

- Treaty of Paris (1898), U.S. National Archives and Records Administration.

- Foraker Act, Pub. L. No. 56-191, 31 Stat. 77 (1900).

- Jones-Shafroth Act, Pub. L. No. 64-368, 39 Stat. 951 (1917).

- Insular Cases, including Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).

- Federal Relations Act, Pub. L. No. 81-600, 64 Stat. 319 (1950).

- Examining Board of Engineers, Architects, and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (1976).

- Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Pub. L. No. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163.

- PROMESA (Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act), Pub. L. No. 114-187, 130 Stat. 549 (2016).

- The Economist/YouGov Poll (2017), via .

- TMZ Interview Transcript (October 7, 2025), via .

- i-D Magazine Interview with Bad Bunny (September 2025), via .

- X Posts and Reactions, including [post:13], [post:15], [post:18], [post:22], [post:24], [post:34], [post:37].