The Holy Family: Model For Us All

Reflection on the Catholic Readings for the Feast of the Holy Family  

December 28, 2025 (Year A)

On this Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, the Church invites us to contemplate the domestic life of the Savior and to hold up His family as the model for our own. The readings speak profoundly to the joys, duties, and trials of family life, reminding us that holiness is forged not in perfection but in fidelity, mutual respect, forgiveness, and trust in God's providence.

 First Reading: Sirach 3:2-6, 12-14

The Book of Sirach offers timeless wisdom on honoring parents. God establishes parental authority as a reflection of divine order, and those who honor father and mother reap blessings: atonement for sins, answered prayers, and long life. Especially poignant is the call to care for aging parents with kindness, even when frailty tests patience: "My son, take care of your father when he is old... even if his mind fail, be considerate of him."

This reading challenges us to see family obligations not as burdens but as paths to holiness. In a culture that often marginalizes the elderly, Sirach reminds us that reverence for parents mirrors reverence for God Himself.

 Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 128:1-5

"Blessed are those who fear the Lord and walk in his ways." The psalm paints a beautiful image of family blessed by God: fruitful labor, a faithful spouse "like a fruitful vine," and children "like olive plants" around the table. This domestic prosperity flows from reverence for the Lord. Family thrives when rooted in faith.

 Second Reading: Colossians 3:12-21 (or shorter 3:12-17)

St. Paul urges us to "put on" the virtues of Christ: compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, patience, and above all, love, which "binds everything together in perfect harmony." Forgiveness is central—"as the Lord has forgiven you, so you must forgive." He addresses family roles with mutual submission in Christ: wives and husbands in love, children in obedience, fathers in gentle guidance.

Though some verses reflect the cultural context of the time, the heart of Paul's message is reciprocal love and peace rooted in Christ. Family becomes a "domestic church" when its members clothe themselves in these virtues.

 Gospel: Matthew 2:13-15, 19-23

The Gospel presents the Holy Family not in serene Nazareth but in crisis: fleeing as refugees into Egypt to escape Herod's murderous rage. An angel warns Joseph in a dream, and he obeys immediately—"he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt." Later, guided again by dreams, they return and settle in Nazareth.

This is no idealized portrait. The Holy Family faces danger, exile, uncertainty, and loss (echoing the slaughter of the Holy Innocents). Yet their response is swift obedience and trust. Joseph protects; Mary ponders and accompanies; the Child Jesus, though divine, submits to human vulnerability. Their holiness shines precisely in trial.

 A Unified Message for Today

Taken together, these readings reveal that family life is the ordinary crucible where extraordinary holiness is formed. Honor and care across generations (Sirach), virtues of Christ lived daily (Colossians), and radical trust in God's guidance amid hardship (Matthew) form the blueprint.

The Holy Family was not exempt from suffering—poverty, displacement, threats—yet they became holy through love, obedience, and fidelity. In our own families, marked by busyness, conflicts, illnesses, or separations, we are called to imitate them: to forgive quickly, to protect the vulnerable, to listen for God's voice in the night, and to make our homes places where Christ dwells.

 

Caution Against Politicizing the Holy Family

While the Gospel account of the Flight into Egypt powerfully illustrates the vulnerability of the Holy Family and God's providential care amid peril, it is important to resist efforts to instrumentalize this sacred event for contemporary political debates on immigration and deportation.

Some advocates claim that Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were "refugees," "migrants," or even "illegal immigrants," directly equating their journey with modern undocumented border crossings. This analogy often falls short historically and theologically.

At the time of Christ's birth (around 6–4 BC), both Judea (under Herod the Great, a Roman client king) and Egypt were provinces within the same Roman Empire. Egypt had become a Roman province in 30 BC after Octavian's defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra. Travel between Judea and Egypt involved moving from one administrative region to another—comparable today to crossing from one U.S. state to another, such as New York to Pennsylvania—rather than crossing an international border into a foreign sovereign nation.

There were no modern immigration controls, passports, or visa requirements as we understand them. Roman citizens and subjects moved relatively freely within the Empire's provinces, especially along well-established routes like the Via Maris coastal road connecting Judea to Egypt. The Holy Family's flight escaped Herod's local jurisdiction (he ruled only Judea, Samaria, and Idumea), but they remained under Roman imperial authority. Thus, they did not enter Egypt "illegally" or as undocumented immigrants violating a foreign nation's laws.

Theologically, Matthew presents this event as fulfillment of prophecy ("Out of Egypt I called my son," Hos 11:1) and a parallel to Israel's exodus, emphasizing divine protection rather than a commentary on migration policy. While the Holy Family certainly experienced displacement and hardship—fleeing tyranny and becoming exiles in a foreign land—their situation aligns more closely with internal displacement or seeking safety within a shared political entity than with modern international refugee status or unauthorized border crossing.

Catholic teaching, including Pope Pius XII's Exsul Familia Nazarethana (1952), describes the Holy Family as the "archetype of every refugee family," highlighting their vulnerability to inspire compassion for those fleeing persecution today. The Church upholds the dignity of migrants, the obligation of nations to welcome those in grave need (to the extent possible), and the right of sovereign states to regulate borders. However, it does not equate the Holy Family's unique, divinely guided journey with endorsement of unrestricted immigration or dismissal of lawful borders.

In charity, we must care for the stranger (Mt 25:35) and address root causes of forced migration, but without distorting Scripture or history to advance partisan agendas. The Feast of the Holy Family invites us to imitate their trust in God, mutual love, and obedience—not to weaponize their story in cultural wars.

May we honor them by building families rooted in faith, welcoming the vulnerable with prudence and mercy, and praying for just solutions to the complexities of human mobility. 

Holy Family, pray for us.

As we close the Christmas season, may the Holy Family intercede for our families. May we welcome the Christ Child not only into mangers of sentiment but into the real, messy, beautiful reality of our daily lives together.

Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph—pray for us.

Urgent plea for help!  We need donations now.  Please help us. Donate to our gofundme or cashapp. This work is crucial for so many right now. Please consider donating or sharing to help keep this ministry running. Every little bit helps in a time when faith is needed most. Thank you!  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/sacerdotus-evangelization-work

The Manufactured Outrage Against Pope Leo XIV:

The Manufactured Outrage Against Pope Leo XIV:  

How American Right-Wing Activists Distort Catholic Teaching on Migration, Islam, and the Gospel Call to Welcome the Stranger

In the closing weeks of 2025, Pope Leo XIV has become the latest target of a coordinated campaign of vilification from segments of the American far right. The trigger was a series of remarks the Holy Father made during an interreligious dialogue in Strasbourg and in a subsequent letter to the bishops of Europe. In those remarks, Leo XIV reiterated the Church’s perennial teaching that migrants and refugees possess an inherent dignity, that wealthy nations have a moral duty to assist those fleeing war and persecution, and that Europe’s Christian identity is not threatened by the presence of peaceful Muslim neighbors but by its own abandonment of charity and solidarity.

Within hours, social-media personalities, certain Catholic media outlets with nationalist leanings, and political commentators who rarely attend Mass unless a camera is present declared that the Pope had “declared open borders,” “surrendered Europe to Islam,” and “betrayed Christendom.” Memes depicting Leo XIV in a keffiyeh or bowing toward Mecca proliferated. Petitions demanding that he “resign or recant” gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures, many from accounts with Confederate flags or “Deus Vult” banners in their profiles.

This is not principled disagreement. It is a deliberate, racially charged caricature of a pontiff whose actual words are far closer to John Paul II and Benedict XVI than the activists want to admit. And it exposes a deeper malaise: a significant portion of the American right, including some who call themselves Catholic, has elevated a white-ethnic nationalist ideology above the Gospel itself.

 1. What Pope Leo XIV Actually Said

In his Strasbourg address (November 2025), the Pope stated:

> “Europe was built on the encounter between Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome—that is, faith, reason, and law. To welcome the stranger in an orderly way is not to dilute that heritage; it is to live it. The Muslim who flees death in Syria or poverty in the Sahel is just as much our neighbor as the Christian from Damascus. Both deserve protection, both deserve respect for their conscience, and both challenge us to practice the corporal works of mercy that Christ will judge us.”

In his letter to European bishops, he wrote:

> “Prudential regulation of migration flows is legitimate and necessary. But a nation that possesses surplus while others lack bread cannot invoke ‘sovereignty’ as an excuse to abandon the poor at its gates. The common destination of goods is a principle of the social doctrine as binding as the right to private property.”

Nowhere did he call for the abolition of borders. Nowhere did he deny the state’s right to enforce immigration law. Nowhere did he suggest that Europe must accept every economic migrant without distinction. He simply restated what every pope since Leo XIII has taught.

 2. The Church Has Always Taught the Legitimacy of Borders—and the Duty to the Stranger

The activists who scream “open borders” have apparently never read the Catechism they claim to defend:

> “The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin… Political authorities… may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions… Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.” (CCC 2241)

Note the balance: the right of nations to control immigration is affirmed in the same paragraph as the duty of prosperous nations to welcome those in genuine need. Pope Benedict XVI said the same in Caritas in Veritate (§62) and John Paul II in Ecclesia in America (§40) and Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (§39). Even the 1952 apostolic constitution Exsul Familia, written under Pius XII, speaks of both the “right of the family to migration” and the “right of the state to regulate migration flows.”

The current critics act as if Leo XIV invented something new. He did not. He simply refuses to ignore half of the Church’s teaching the way they do.

 3. The Biblical Mandate Is Unambiguous

Scripture does not hedge:

- “When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the stranger. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.” (Lev 19:33-34)

- “I was a stranger and you welcomed me… Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.” (Mt 25:35,40)

- “Contribute to the needs of the saints; extend hospitality to strangers (πάροικους).” (Rom 12:13)

- “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers (φιλοξενία), for by doing that some have entertained angels unawares.” (Heb 13:2)

The Church Fathers were equally clear. St. John Chrysostom, hardly a soft cosmopolitan, preached:

> “If you see anyone in exile or cast out from his country… do not ask about his past life… This is inhumanity, to pry curiously into a person’s former life when he is suffering misfortune.” (Homily on 1 Timothy)

St. Ambrose wrote:

> “You are not making a gift of your possessions to the poor person. You are handing over to him what is his. For what has been given in common for the use of all, you have arrogated to yourself. The earth belongs to all, not to the rich.” (On Naboth 1.2)

To refuse aid to the stranger in dire need is not “common sense”; it is a rejection of the judgment scene in Matthew 25.

 4. Church Teaching on Islam and Religious Respect

Pope Leo XIV’s critics also distort his outreach to Muslims.

The Second Vatican Council declared:

> “The Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God… They strive to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees… Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet.” (Nostra Aetate §3)

Pope St. John Paul II kissed the Qur’an as a gesture of respect (not worship) and prayed in the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus. Benedict XVI quoted a Byzantine emperor critically about Islam yet still prayed alongside the Grand Mufti in the Blue Mosque. Francis called for “fraternity” with Muslims in the Document on Human Fraternity. None of them converted to Islam or called for its dominance. They simply obeyed the Gospel command to love enemies and the natural-law principle that error has no rights but persons do.

Leo XIV has done nothing different. To claim that calling Muslims “brothers” or urging respect for their places of worship is “surrender” is to reject two thousand years of doctrine.

 5. The Racial and Ideological Core of the Attack

Let us speak plainly: the loudest voices attacking Pope Leo XIV are overwhelmingly white, Western, and steeped in ethnic anxiety. Their social-media timelines are filled with “great replacement” graphs, crusader memes, and complaints about “low-trust societies.” Many openly identify as “race realists” or post “It’s OK to be white” slogans. A non-trivial number celebrate January 6, deny the Holocaust in private Discords, or retweet accounts that do.

Some of them are Catholic. A few are even clergy or prominent lay apologists. They have traded the universal call of the Gospel for the particularist call of blood-and-soil ideology. When the Pope defends the dignity of brown-skinned refugees or speaks respectfully of Muslims, they hear a threat to “Western civilization”—by which they mean white, European, nominally Christian civilization. Christ’s call to lose one’s life is subordinated to the political project of preserving one’s tribe.

This is not authentic traditionalism. It is a new paganism wearing a thin Catholic veneer. The early Church grew because it welcomed the barbarian at the gates, not because it built higher walls. St. Paul did not tell the Roman Christians to deport the immigrants in the Subura. He told them to outdo one another in showing honor (Rom 12:10).

 6. Worshipping Ideology, Not Christ

When self-described “trad” Catholics side with pagan nationalists against the Vicar of Christ, they reveal whom they truly serve. The Pope is not infallible in prudential immigration policy, but he is infallible when he hands on the deposit of faith—and the deposit of faith includes both the legitimacy of borders and the non-negotiable command to welcome the stranger in need.

To call the Pope a “heretic” or “antipope” because he will not bless your political program is schismatic in spirit if not yet in canon law.

Christ warned us: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven” (Mt 7:21). Some of those shouting “Lord, Lord” today are the same ones sharing memes about machine-gunning migrant boats. Their god is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus. Their god is a golden calf made of race, soil, and nostalgia.

 How Marjorie Taylor Greene Discovered the Fanaticism of the Hard-Right Base

In early 2025, after Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly praised Pope Leo XIV’s call for charity toward refugees and criticized the “cruel memes” circulating about drowning migrants, she was immediately swarmed by what she later described privately as “an absolute psycho mob.” Her direct messages and comment sections were filled with thousands of former supporters calling her a “globalist shill,” a “papal whore,” and far worse; several promised to primary her with a “real America-First Catholic.” One prominent MAGA influencer with 800,000 followers posted a video declaring that “MTG has betrayed Christendom for brown invaders,” while another superimposed her face onto images of the Pope in a keffiyeh. Death threats followed within hours. Shaken, Greene told allies off-record that she finally understood the movement she had helped unleash: “These people aren’t conservative, they’re a cult. They don’t want a republic; they want a white ethno-state with crucifixes on the wall, and if the Pope doesn’t agree with every one of their talking points, they’ll burn him in effigy and call it defending the faith.” The episode marked a quiet but decisive break; she has since refused to appear on the platforms that once made her a star.  She was recently forced to resign from Congress after receiving death threats from these fanatics. 

 Catholics Are Forbidden to Judge the Pope in Matters of Faith and Morals

The Church has always taught that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra or definitively teaches on faith and morals, possesses that infallibility promised by Christ to Peter (Mt 16:18-19; Lk 22:32). Even outside formal ex cathedra definitions, Catholics owe the Pope the “religious submission of intellect and will” to his ordinary magisterium (Lumen Gentium 25; Canon 752). Canon 1404 expressly states: “The First See is judged by no one” (Prima Sedes a nemine iudicatur), a principle repeated from the Liber Diurnus through Gratian to the 1917 and 1983 Codes. St. Robert Bellarmine taught that to accuse the Pope of heresy in his official teaching is itself proximate to heresy (De Romano Pontifice, Book II, ch. 30). St. Catherine of Siena, the fiercest critic of popes in her age, still wrote to Pope Gregory XI: “Even if he were an incarnate devil, we ought not to raise up our heads against him.” St. John Fisher, facing martyrdom under Henry VIII, declared: “The Pope is the Vicar of Christ; I may not judge him, but I must obey him even unto death.” To set oneself up as the Pope’s judge in matters of doctrine is therefore not courageous orthodoxy; it is the ancient sin of Korah (Num 16), who rebelled against Moses and was swallowed by the earth.

Conclusion

Pope Leo XIV is not calling Catholics to be Catholic—to hold in tension the legitimate rights of nations and the transcendent claims of charity, to respect legitimate religious differences without relativism, and to see in the face of the suffering stranger the face of Christ Himself.

Those who distort his words into “open borders” and “Islamization” are not defending the Church. They are defending an idol. And idols always demand human sacrifice, especially of the weak.

May the Lord grant them conversion of heart, and may He grant the rest of us the courage to love as He loved—without counting the cost and without fearing the crowd.

 References

- Catechism of the Catholic Church (1997), §2241

- Vatican II, Nostra Aetate (1965), §3

- Pius XII, Exsul Familia (1952)

- John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987), §39

- John Paul II, Message for World Migration Day 2000

- Benedict XVI, Caritas in Veritate (2009), §62

- Leo XIV, Address at the European Interreligious Meeting, Strasbourg, 14 November 2025

- Leo XIV, Letter to the Bishops of Europe on Migration and Fraternity, 28 November 2025

- Sacred Scripture (RSV-2CE)

- St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on 1 Timothy

- St. Ambrose, De Naboth

Superman II, General Zod, and the Immigration Debate: A Comprehensive Commentary on Immigrant Identities and Societal Impact

Superman II, General Zod, and the Immigration Debate: A Comprehensive Commentary on Immigrant Identities and Societal Impact

Superman II (1980), directed by Richard Lester, is more than a superhero blockbuster; it is a narrative rich with allegorical potential for examining one of the most contentious issues of our time: immigration. The film juxtaposes Superman, an extraterrestrial immigrant who embodies the virtues of lawful assimilation, with General Zod and his Kryptonian cohorts, who represent chaos and disregard for their host society. This dichotomy mirrors real-world debates about good and bad immigrants, reflecting tensions between those who enter legally, respect societal norms, and contribute positively, and those who arrive unlawfully, engaging in behaviors that disrupt communities. By exploring Superman II through the lens of immigration, this essay argues that immigrants cannot be grouped monolithically. It draws parallels between Superman’s journey from Krypton to Kansas and the aspirations of legal immigrants, critiques the oversimplification of immigrant identities in political rhetoric, and addresses real-world issues such as crime rates and quality-of-life concerns in urban centers like New York City. Ultimately, the film serves as a call for nuanced immigration policies that foster integration while addressing legitimate concerns about crime and cultural cohesion. Superman: The Archetype of the Good Immigrant Superman, born Kal-El on the planet Krypton, is the quintessential immigrant success story. Sent to Earth as an infant to escape Krypton’s destruction, he is adopted by Jonathan and Martha Kent, a farming couple in Smallville, Kansas. Raised with American values of kindness, morality, and respect for the law, Kal-El becomes Clark Kent by day and Superman by necessity, using his extraordinary powers to protect humanity. His journey reflects the idealized narrative of the good immigrant: one who enters a society through accepted channels, embraces its culture, and contributes to its betterment. As X user HansHorlacher observes, “Superman was adopted as a child and naturalized as a citizen through the legal system, that he grew up to risk his life to protect”. This underscores Superman’s role as a model of assimilation, not by erasing his Kryptonian heritage but by harmonizing it with American ideals. Superman’s legal status, symbolized through his adoption, aligns with the pathways of legal immigration. His upbringing in Kansas, a heartland emblem of American virtue, mirrors the historical assimilation of immigrants during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when millions arrived at Ellis Island, underwent vetting, and integrated into American society. For instance, Italian and Irish immigrants of that era, often arriving legally, faced initial prejudice but gradually became pillars of American culture through hard work and civic engagement. Superman’s story echoes this trajectory, suggesting that legal immigrants who adopt their host country’s values can become integral to its fabric. The historical context of immigration in the United States provides further insight into Superman’s narrative. Between 1880 and 1920, over 20 million immigrants arrived, primarily from Europe, contributing to the nation’s industrial growth. While they faced nativist backlash, their eventual assimilation strengthened the American melting pot. Superman’s journey parallels this process: he arrives as an outsider but becomes a cultural icon, embodying the American Dream. His commitment to justice and self-sacrifice reflects the contributions of legal immigrants who, through education, entrepreneurship, and community involvement, enhance their adopted societies. Moreover, Superman’s dual identity as Clark Kent and Superman reflects the immigrant experience of balancing cultural heritage with integration. He retains his Kryptonian essence—his powers and memories of his parents, Jor-El and Lara—but chooses to serve Earth, embodying the principle of e pluribus unum (out of many, one). This balance is crucial in modern immigration debates, where the expectation of assimilation is often misconstrued as cultural erasure. Superman demonstrates that immigrants can honor their origins while contributing to their new home, a model for legal immigrants seeking to emulate his example. His ability to navigate both identities—Kryptonian and American—offers a blueprint for immigrants who strive to maintain their cultural roots while embracing their host country’s values. General Zod and the Specter of Bad Immigration In stark contrast, General Zod, Ursa, and Non, exiled from Krypton for their crimes, represent a destructive form of immigration. Banished to the Phantom Zone, they are inadvertently freed and arrive on Earth, not to integrate but to conquer. Their superhuman powers, unchecked by any regard for human laws or norms, make them a formidable threat. Zod’s declaration, “Kneel before Zod,” and their destruction of landmarks like the White House symbolize a rejection of their host society’s values, evoking fears associated with illegal immigration and criminality. As X user BobiusPrime notes, “Superman was an immigrant... an immigrant that assimilated into the US culture and traditions. On the other hand, General Zod, Ursa, and Non were also immigrants, did bad things, and were deported”. This comparison highlights the film’s narrative dichotomy: while Superman uplifts Earth, Zod seeks to subjugate it. Zod’s arrival parallels public anxieties about undocumented immigrants who bypass legal pathways and engage in behaviors perceived as disruptive. In contemporary discourse, illegal immigration is often linked to crime and societal disorder, a narrative amplified by high-profile incidents. For example, a 2024 City Journal article details violent crimes in New York City, such as shootings outside migrant shelters, attributed to undocumented immigrants. These incidents fuel perceptions of a migrant crime wave, even if they do not reflect broader trends. Zod’s actions—disrupting global order, disrespecting authority, and causing chaos—mirror these fears, positioning him as the archetype of the bad immigrant who threatens the social fabric. The film’s depiction of Zod’s exile to the Phantom Zone also resonates with historical and modern deportation practices. On Krypton, Zod and his companions were banished for attempting to overthrow the government, a punishment akin to modern deportation orders for criminal immigrants. In the U.S., Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deported over 271,484 immigrants in 2024, many for criminal convictions, according to ICE data. While these deportations target individuals who violate laws, they also spark debates about fairness and due process, particularly when entire communities are stigmatized. Zod’s eventual defeat by Superman suggests that addressing criminal elements requires precision, not blanket condemnation, a lesson applicable to immigration policy. However, Superman II also serves as a cautionary tale against overgeneralization. Just as Superman’s heroism does not mean all Kryptonians are benevolent, Zod’s villainy does not indict all immigrants. The film implicitly challenges viewers to judge individuals by their actions, not their origins. This nuance is critical in real-world debates, where the actions of a few are often used to stereotype entire communities. By presenting both Superman and Zod as Kryptonian immigrants with divergent paths, the film underscores the importance of distinguishing between those who contribute and those who harm, a distinction often lost in polarized rhetoric. The Danger of Overgeneralization in Immigration Discourse The immigration debate is often polarized, with some right-wing commentators painting all immigrants as threats to societal stability. This perspective, reflected in posts on X, draws parallels between Zod’s destructive behavior and fears of unchecked immigration. For instance, JamesT_AL writes, “Zod is the post Hart-Cellar immigrant. Forced on us, hateful towards the culture, and wishes to make everything like the shithole he came from”. This rhetoric echoes the broader tendency to vilify immigrants, particularly those who are undocumented, as inherently criminal or disruptive. Such generalizations, while emotionally resonant, distort the complexity of immigrant experiences and contributions. Historical context reveals the dangers of such overgeneralizations. During the late 19th century, nativist movements like the Know-Nothings targeted Irish and German immigrants, labeling them as criminals and cultural threats. The 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act banned Chinese immigration based on unfounded fears of economic and social harm, setting a precedent for discriminatory policies. Today, these patterns persist in rhetoric that conflates all immigrants with crime or disorder. For example, post-1965 immigration, enabled by the Hart-Celler Act, diversified the U.S. population but sparked fears of cultural erosion, as seen in JamesT_AL’s post. Yet, data consistently challenges this narrative. A 2024 report by the American Immigration Council found that as the immigrant share of the U.S. population grew from 6.2% in 1980 to 13.9% in 2022, the total crime rate dropped by 60.4%, with violent crime falling by 34.5% and property crime by 63.3%. A 2020 study in Texas, which tracks immigration status in arrests, found that undocumented immigrants had lower felony arrest rates than native-born citizens, particularly for violent crimes. These statistics suggest that immigrants, like Superman, often contribute to safer and more prosperous communities. Immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens, with a 2018 Cato Institute study finding that undocumented immigrants in Texas had an incarceration rate of 0.71% compared to 1.6% for native-born citizens. However, the perception of a migrant crime wave persists, driven by anecdotal evidence and media amplification. The City Journal highlights cases like the murder of Laken Riley in Georgia, allegedly committed by an undocumented immigrant, as evidence of a broader threat. While such incidents are tragic, they are not representative of the immigrant population as a whole. The Brennan Center for Justice notes that in New York City precincts with large migrant shelters, crime trends vary, with some areas seeing decreases and others increases, indicating no clear causal link to immigration. This complexity mirrors Superman II’s narrative, where the actions of Zod and Superman cannot be used to judge all Kryptonians. The overgeneralization of immigrants as criminals often stems from confirmation bias, where high-profile incidents overshadow broader trends. For example, media coverage of crimes by undocumented immigrants, such as those highlighted in a 2024 Fox News report, amplifies public fear, even when overall crime rates decline. In Superman II, the media within the film—newspapers and television—report on Zod’s rampage, heightening public fear, much like modern media amplifies migrant-related incidents. This dynamic underscores the need for data-driven discourse that distinguishes between individual actions and systemic patterns, a lesson the film subtly imparts. Crime, Immigration, and Localized Challenges While broad crime statistics refute the notion of an immigrant-driven crime surge, localized issues cannot be ignored. In New York City, the arrival of approximately 190,000 migrants since 2022 has strained resources and sparked concerns about public safety. The City Journal reports a 50% spike in robberies in Queens’ 115th Precinct, particularly around Roosevelt Avenue, where migrant shelters are concentrated. Specific gangs, such as Tren de Aragua from Venezuela, have been linked to crimes like extortion, human trafficking, and violent assaults, amplifying fears of disorder. These cases, while outliers, contribute to the perception that illegal immigration fuels crime, much like Zod’s actions fuel distrust in Superman II. However, overall crime in New York City fell nearly 3% in 2024, with 3,662 fewer incidents, including reductions in murder (down 12%), robbery (down 6%), and burglary (down 13%), according to NYPD data. This decline occurred despite the migrant influx, suggesting that immigration does not inherently drive crime. Police data also indicates that American-born perpetrators often target migrants, complicating the narrative of migrant criminality. For instance, a 2024 NYPD report notes that many robberies in migrant-heavy areas involve local gangs exploiting vulnerable newcomers, not migrants committing crimes themselves. This dynamic mirrors Superman II, where Zod’s actions are not representative of all Kryptonians but create fear that impacts perceptions of Superman. Addressing these challenges requires targeted policies, not blanket condemnation. In Superman II, Superman defeats Zod through strategic intervention, not by rejecting all Kryptonians. Similarly, immigration policies should focus on vetting, deporting criminal elements, and supporting legal pathways for those who seek to contribute. Programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which provide legal status to undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, exemplify this approach, enabling individuals to emulate Superman’s model of integration and contribution. In 2024, over 800,000 DACA recipients contributed to the U.S. economy, with many working in essential industries like healthcare and education, per the Center for American Progress. The rise of specific gangs like Tren de Aragua highlights the need for precise enforcement. ICE’s 2024 operations targeting transnational criminal organizations resulted in over 20,000 arrests of gang-affiliated immigrants, a small fraction of the total immigrant population. These efforts demonstrate that addressing criminality without stigmatizing entire communities is possible, much like Superman’s targeted defeat of Zod preserves Earth’s trust in him. Policies that combine enforcement with integration—such as language classes, job training, and community policing—can mitigate localized crime while fostering cohesion. Quality of Life and Cultural Tensions in New York City Beyond crime, immigration debates often center on quality-of-life issues, particularly in urban centers like New York City. Residents have reported disruptions linked to immigrant communities, particularly Dominican immigrants in neighborhoods like Washington Heights and Inwood. Complaints include public drinking, riding motorcycles on sidewalks, blasting loud music from apartments and car stereos, smoking in public spaces, littering, and setting up beach chairs on sidewalks, leaving behind liquor bottles and debris. These behaviors, documented in community forums and local news, contribute to a perceived decline in urban livability. A 2007 NBC News article from Waukegan, Illinois, describes similar frustrations, where loud music and parties linked to smuggling operations alienated residents, highlighting how cultural differences can strain community relations.

Dominican immigrants in the Bronx publicly drinking and litttering

Dominican immigrant youth setting up a camp with a table with marijuana on the sidewalk in the Bronx

In New York, Roosevelt Avenue in Queens has become a focal point for such concerns. A 2024 City Journal article describes the area as a third-world bazaar, with open-air markets, prostitution, and public intoxication creating a sense of disorder. These issues resonate with the cultural clashes depicted in Superman II, where Zod’s imposition of Kryptonian dominance disrupts Earth’s social order. For example, Zod’s destruction of human infrastructure parallels the disruption caused by behaviors like public drinking or loud music, which challenge local norms. However, attributing these problems to all immigrants ignores the broader context. Many of these behaviors stem from economic precarity, lack of integration resources, or cultural misunderstandings, not inherent criminality. For instance, public drinking and loud music may reflect cultural norms from immigrants’ home countries, where such activities are less regulated. Superman’s assimilation offers a solution to these tensions. Raised to respect Kansas’ quiet, orderly culture, he adapts to his environment without losing his Kryptonian identity. Similarly, integration programs that teach civic norms, language skills, and community expectations can help immigrants align with local standards while preserving their heritage. New York City’s immigrant affairs programs, such as the Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs, provide legal aid, language classes, and cultural orientation, helping newcomers navigate their responsibilities, much like the Kents guided Superman. Community policing and cultural exchange initiatives, like neighborhood dialogues in Washington Heights, can also bridge divides, reducing friction over quality-of-life issues. Historical examples illustrate the potential for integration to resolve cultural tensions. In the early 20th century, Italian immigrants in New York faced similar complaints about loud street festivals and public behavior, yet over time, their cultural contributions—cuisine, art, and community organizations—enriched the city. Today, Dominican immigrants, despite quality-of-life concerns, contribute significantly to New York’s economy, with over 900,000 Dominicans in the U.S. owning businesses and working in sectors like healthcare and education, per the Migration Policy Institute. Fostering integration, rather than exclusion, can transform cultural clashes into opportunities for enrichment, as Superman’s story suggests. Historical Parallels and the Evolution of Immigration Policy The allegory of Superman II resonates with America’s long history of immigration debates. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw waves of European immigrants—Irish, Italians, Poles—who faced nativist backlash but eventually assimilated, contributing to America’s cultural and economic growth. The 1965 Hart-Celler Act, referenced in X posts like JamesT_AL’s, marked a shift by abolishing national-origin quotas, increasing immigration from Latin America, Asia, and Africa. While this diversification enriched the U.S., it also sparked fears of cultural erosion, echoing Zod’s threat in Superman II. Yet, these fears often overlook the contributions of post-1965 immigrants, who have driven innovation, entrepreneurship, and cultural dynamism. For example, immigrants founded 55% of U.S. startups valued at over $1 billion in 2024, per the National Foundation for American Policy. Contemporary immigration policy must balance security with opportunity. Legal pathways, like those Superman symbolically navigates, ensure that newcomers are vetted and prepared to contribute. However, the backlog of legal immigration applications—over 4 million in 2024, per U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services—creates pressure for illegal entry, fueling perceptions of disorder. Streamlining legal processes, expanding work visas, and investing in integration programs can reduce illegal immigration while fostering Superman-like contributions. Conversely, policies that focus solely on enforcement, like mass deportations, risk alienating communities and echoing the indiscriminate exile of Zod’s Phantom Zone, which ultimately failed to address Krypton’s underlying issues. The U.S. has a history of balancing enforcement with opportunity. The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act legalized 3 million undocumented immigrants while strengthening border security, a model that encouraged integration while addressing illegal entry. Today, policies like Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans and Haitians allow legal work and residency, reducing the incentive for illegal immigration. These approaches align with Superman’s model, fostering contributions from immigrants who, like him, seek to build rather than destroy. The Role of Media and Public Perception Media plays a significant role in shaping perceptions of immigration, often amplifying fears of crime and disorder. In Superman II, the media within the film—newspapers and television—report on Zod’s rampage, heightening public fear. Similarly, sensationalized coverage of migrant-related crimes, such as those highlighted in City Journal, shapes public opinion, even when data contradicts the narrative. X posts, while offering raw public sentiment, often perpetuate stereotypes, as seen in JamesT_AL’s comparison of immigrants to Zod. These platforms, while valuable for gauging public mood, lack the rigor of peer-reviewed research, making them inconclusive for policy-making, per the provided guidelines. Countering these narratives requires highlighting positive immigrant stories, like those of entrepreneurs, healthcare workers, and community leaders who embody Superman’s spirit. For example, immigrants make up 17% of the U.S. workforce, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, filling critical roles in industries like healthcare (28% of physicians) and technology (24% of STEM workers). Public campaigns that showcase these contributions, alongside transparent crime data, can shift perceptions from fear to appreciation. For instance, the “I Am an Immigrant” campaign by the Immigration Advocates Network highlights success stories, fostering a narrative of contribution rather than threat, much like Superman’s heroic image counters Zod’s villainy. Conclusion: Embracing the Superman Model for a Stronger Society Superman II offers a powerful allegory for navigating the complexities of immigration. Superman, the lawful immigrant who embraces American values, represents the potential for newcomers to enrich their adopted societies through integration and contribution. General Zod, the destructive outsider, embodies fears of illegal immigration and criminality, but his actions do not define all immigrants. The tendency to paint all immigrants as heroes or villains, as seen in some right-wing rhetoric on X, oversimplifies a multifaceted issue. Crime statistics, while showing localized challenges, refute the notion of a migrant-driven crime surge, and quality-of-life concerns in places like New York City can be addressed through integration and community engagement, not exclusion. By fostering policies that encourage lawful immigration, vetting, and assimilation—much like the Kents nurtured Kal-El—the United States can cultivate more Supermans and fewer Zods. This requires balancing enforcement with opportunity, addressing cultural tensions with empathy, and grounding policy in data rather than fear. Just as Superman defeats Zod without rejecting his own Kryptonian identity, society can embrace immigrants who contribute while addressing those who harm, ensuring that immigration remains a source of strength and unity. By emulating Superman’s model—legal entry, respect for the law, and a commitment to service—the U.S. can harness the potential of immigration to build a stronger, more cohesive nation. --- Notes: - All asterisks and hashtags have been removed from the text, as requested, while preserving the content and structure.

- The essay expands on the original by deepening the historical context, crime statistics, quality-of-life issues, and policy recommendations, while maintaining the allegory of Superman II.

- Web sources (e.g., American Immigration Council, City Journal) provide statistical and anecdotal context, and X posts illustrate public sentiment but are treated as inconclusive.

- The essay addresses specific concerns like Tren de Aragua and Roosevelt Avenue, emphasizing targeted solutions over generalization. - If further refinements, additional sections, or specific adjustments are needed, please let me know!

Pope Francis: "Grave Sin" Not to Offer Aid to Migrant Vessels

Pope Francis has been a vocal advocate for migrants, emphasizing the moral imperative to aid those in need. In a recent address, he strongly condemned the act of turning away migrants, labeling it a "grave sin." This stance is consistent with his long-standing message of acceptance and compassion towards migrants, urging societies to create safe and legal pathways for those seeking refuge from war, violence, persecution, and poverty.

The Pope's words come at a time when immigration is a contentious issue globally, sparking intense debate and varied reactions. His call for a global governance of migration based on justice, fraternity, and solidarity challenges individuals and nations to reflect on their responsibilities towards migrants. He emphasizes that indifference and rejection are the true dangers migrants face, not just the perilous journeys they undertake.

Pope Francis' appeal is not just to political leaders but to everyone, encouraging a collective effort to combat human trafficking and support migrants. He highlights the role of prayer and moral support in addition to direct action, suggesting that everyone has a part to play in addressing this humanitarian crisis.

The Pope's message is a powerful reminder of the shared humanity that binds us all and the ethical obligations that come with it. It's a call to look beyond borders and politics and to see the faces of individuals and families in desperate need of help. As the leader of the Catholic Church, Pope Francis' words carry significant weight, and it remains to be seen how his call for action will influence the global conversation and policies on migration.

As usual, those who subscribe to conservatism took to heart the pope's works and attacked him. Among the vitriolic attitude were Catholics including armchair pundits Taylor R. Marshall who tweeted the typical "Vatican has walls" meme which was created in an attempt to make the pope look like a hypocrite. He also doubled down by asking how many migrants the Vatican has taken in.  

Anyone with basic geography skills or who has visited the Vatican knows that the Vatican does not have a wall closing it off to the rest of the world. Moreover, those of us who read and are aware of current events know that the pope and Vatican accepted several migrant family into the Vatican (see: Vatican Houses Syrian Refugee Family | TIME).  As usual, just like leftists, conservatives also love to play the sophism game creating false narratives and pushing them on social media where naive people who subscribe to their idealogies do not bother to vet them and accept them as factual.

Shame on Taylor Marshall and other Catholics for pushing this inhumane and anti-Christ rhetoric. Jesus said to love one another. Sacred Scripture says to welcome the stranger (see: Leviticus 19:33-34). Pope Francis was just echoing the message found in Sacred Scripture, the Word of God!  

However, it is important to note that the Catholic Church does not teach an open borders all come in doctrine. The Church is clear that nations should help migrants, illegal immigrants, illegal migrants, refugees, illegal aliens, undocumented person, whatever term you want to use.  However, the Church states clearly that nations have a right to protect their borders, have a process of entry and that those entering the nation must respect the hosting nation. See below:

That being stated, there is no reason for people to get upset at the Pope for following God and echoing God's desires that we welcome the stranger and love one another.  Only the devil is about division. Marshall, other Catholics and conservatives that have a disdain for people seeking help in foreign nations have to decide who they want to follow.  They are following the devil now with their rhetoric. Jesus was never about pushing people away who sought help legitimately.   

The pope's comments were most likely in response to a video circulating of Spain's coast guard crushing a boat full of migrants with their own motor boat.

This video has prompted a lot of reaction from social media users, most condemning it while some celebrating Spain for doing this.  Among them are clergy from many religious denominations including Calvin Robinson, a self-professed "priest" of the "Old Catholic" denomination (see:Fr Calvin Robinson on X: "Migrant dinghy crushed by Spanish police boat. It can be done. The Spaniards know how to Reconquesta. https://t.co/2FBaPEmIhf" / X)

Robinson was met with both criticism and praise for this callous post on X (formerly Twitter).  Despite the criticism, Robinson continued to defend his remarks.  

Pope Francis is the son of immigrants from Italy who settled in Argentina.  Therefore, it is understandable why he speaks about accepting migrants and caring for them. He knows first hand the hardships they face.  

Source:

Pope: Driving away migrants is a 'grave sin' | USCCB

Pope Francis says refusing aid to migrants a 'grave sin' | Reuters

Pope Francis: Intentionally hurting migrants ‘is a grave sin’ | Catholic News Agency

Pope Francis: Rejecting migrants is a ‘grave sin’ | America Magazine

Pope Francis denounces anti-migrant measures as grave sins (thehill.com)

Pope Francis says those who 'repel' migrants are committing 'grave sin' (mynbc15.com)

Migrant morality: Pope doubles down on message of acceptance | USCCB

Pope Francis calls denying help to migrants a 'grave sin' (newsnationnow.com)

Illegal Migrants Attack Cops Again But at Randall's Island

In a chaotic scene that unfolded at the increasingly lawless Randall’s Island tent city, one person was arrested after a dramatic caught-on-video confrontation between NYPD officers and migrants. The incident occurred when an unnamed individual, who was not supposed to be at the facility, was asked to leave by officials. The exact reason for their presence or what led up to the scuffle remains unclear.

The situation escalated rapidly, with separate cameras capturing different angles of the violent clash. On the video, we can see a group of cops attempting to restrain and arrest a male individual as illegal migrants shout at cops and throw objects. They threw what looked like cooler bags, cups, and other dinnerware. Cots and other furniture were thrown about in the scuffle.  Security from the tent were heard shouting to surround the cops to shield them from the violent and angry mob of illegal migrants. 

This incident just came weeks after an incident in Timeswas Square where illegal migrants attacked two cops (see:Sacerdotus: Attack on NYPD Officers in Times Square: No Bail for Suspects Sparks Controversy).  In this situation,  police officers initially demanded that the group disperse on the night of January 27. However, one uniformed officer suddenly grabbed migrant Yohenry Brito as he pushed a baby stroller carrying his belongings. In an audio recording, Brito can be heard referring to the officers in Spanish, saying, “They look like Ugly Betty.” The officer then led Brito against a building wall as other migrants who had been walking away made a U-turn and appeared to inquire about Brito's actions.

As a second cop spoke to the rest of the group, Brito, 24, flailed in an attempt to evade the first officer. Chaos ensued as both cops struggled to detain Brito across a stretch of sidewalk near 42nd Street and 7th Avenue. Other migrants joined the scuffle, attempting to help Brito break free. Some took turns kicking at the officers while they wrestled on the ground with Brito. In one instance, a migrant wiped out when attempting a kick but missed everything and struck only air. Another migrant dressed in all white—identified as Yorman Reveron—pulled and pushed police off of Brito, who had lost his jacket and shirt during the struggle. Reveron then helped Brito to his feet, and they both fled from the scene.

The bodycam footage also revealed the immense struggle between Brito and the two officers as other migrants assaulted police. The incident has sparked outrage and calls for deploying the National Guard. At least 12 suspects were allegedly involved in this attack; six have been arrested, while five were released on bail, leaving some still at large.

This highly publicized case has drawn attention during an election year, with political debates surrounding law enforcement responses and migrant rights. As prosecutors announced seven indictments related to this incident, tensions remain high in New York City.  There is no word about any charges regarding the new incident at Randall's Island.  

In any event, American citizens need to wake up and stop voting in officials who are facilitating this invasion of illegal migrants.  The borders need to be closed and these individuals sent back to their countries of origin until a vetting process is set up that will allow legitimate asylum seekers to enter our nation and who are tracked so they will not try to remain here illegally. 

---

*Sources:*

1. [New York Post](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/dramatic-confrontation-between-migrants-nyc-cops-ends-with-one-booted-from-r

VIDEO: NYPD cops attacked making arrest at Randall's Island migrant shelter (nydailynews.com)VIDEO: NYPD cops attacked making arrest at Randall's Island migrant shelter (nydailynews.com)

NYPD pelted with backpacks, bottles making arrest at NYC migrant shelter | Fox News

NYPD cops attacked making arrest at Randall’s Island migrant shelter (yahoo.com)

Illegal Migrants to Received Pre-Paid Debit Cards

As American citizens in New York City struggle to pay the high rents, utilities, and inflation driven prices of food, gas and other necessities, illegal migrants will get free money. 

A family of four migrants with two children under age 17 could receive up to $15,200 a year under New York City's controversial new $53 million program that provides pre-paid credit cards to asylum seekers. The initiative, known as the Immediate Response Card, aims to assist migrants with food expenses while they await authorization to work from the federal government.

How It Works

- The pre-paid credit cards are not traditional credit cards; they are **pre-paid debit cards** specifically designated for purchasing food and baby supplies.

- Participants can use these cards at bodegas, grocery stores, supermarkets, and convenience stores.

- The program is designed to cut costs and replace the current food services offered in short-term hotel shelters.

- As part of a one-year pilot program, the city will initially roll out the pre-paid cards to 500 newly arrived families at the Roosevelt Hotel. If successful, it could expand to include a maximum of 6,500 families.

Amounts Received by Asylum Seeker Families

- A single migrant could receive $345 per month.

- A family of three could receive $932 per month.

- A family of four could net a $1,195 allowance per month for use at designated retailers.

- Monthly amounts increase for those with children: $100 per month for kids under 5 and $36 for children aged 5 to 17 years.

- Pregnant asylum seekers can also receive an additional $36 per month on their pre-paid cards.

Savings and Economic Stimulus

- New York City has allocated $53 million to this pilot program, which officials estimate will save $600,000 per month and $7.2 million annually.

- Beyond cost savings, officials hope that using these cards at local retailers will help stimulate the local economy.

In summary, while some social media posts have mischaracterized this program as providing credit cards to migrants, it is important to clarify that these are pre-paid debit cards specifically intended for essential goods like food and baby supplies. The goal is to support migrants while they await work authorization from the federal government.

While the need to care for strangers is biblical, we need to be smart about it. We have our own people who need help, particularly veterans who sacrificed their lives to serve our nation. Next we have the poor who are poor through no fault of their own and those bordering poverty who struggle to pay the exaggerated rents and bills in New York City. Let us not forget our schools which are often neglected. Students do not use textbooks anymore. They have outdated comptuers, I-Pads and tablets. The list goes on and on. We have our own problems and need to care for our own first before we can even attempt to help others. This is why the border needs to be closed and a vetting system installed so that those migrants can come legally and with genuine intentions to work in this nation and hopefully become a citizen. 

Giving out pre-paid debit or credit cards is unfair to taxpayers who did not ask for their money to be spent in this way. Moreover, it will give illegal immigrants an incentive to come here even more. If you can go into another nation, get bussed to a city and given free food and housing and now money, what do you think will happen next?  We will see an influx of illegal immigrants flocking for this dream turned reality.  The desire to work will vanish as it often happens with Americans on the Welfare, SNAP, face-to-face system. They become complacent despite the hardships these programs give when applying and maintaining a case.  

Again, elections have consequences. If New Yorkers continue to vote for politicians who endorse an open border and favoring illegal immigrantion over American citizens, then this will continue. We are already seeing the crime wave being perpetuated by a good number of these illegal migrants.  It is an invasion and our taxpayers are paying for it.  Let us help those who truly need it but do it wisely. 

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  

---

Sources:

1. [NYC migrant families could make up to $15K per year under controversial $53M pre-paid credit card program](https://nypost.com/2024/02/20/us-news/nyc-migrant-families-could-make-up-to-15k-per-year-under-controversial-53m-pre-paid-credit-card-program/)

2. [Migrants in New York City will receive prepaid debit cards, not credit cards, for designated goods](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-nyc-migrants-credit-debit-cards-prepaid-240335300869)

3. [NYC to offer migrants $53M in pre-paid credit cards, report says](https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americ 

NYC migrant families could make up to $15K per year under controversial $53M pre-paid credit card program (nypost.com)

Attack on NYPD Officers in Times Square: No Bail for Suspects Sparks Controversy

A recent attack on two NYPD officers in Times Square has ignited outrage and raised questions about the handling of suspects involved. Critics are demanding answers as to why some of the arrested individuals were quickly released back onto the streets without bail.

The Incident

Nearly a week ago, a group of attackers assaulted two police officers in Times Square, resulting in injuries. The incident left many wondering why certain suspects were not held in custody pending trial.

The Bail Decision

The Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, initially avoided addressing why his office did not seek bail for several of the suspects. Some of these individuals have reportedly fled the state since their release. When questioned by NBC New York, Bragg declined to comment on whether not requesting bail was a mistake. Instead, he simply stated, "We'll speak in court."

Public Outcry and Demands for Accountability

The decision not to seek bail has sparked controversy. Critics argue that an assault on police officers should warrant detention. New York Governor Kathy Hochul expressed her disagreement with the suspects' release and called for their deportation. She emphasized that the issue lies not with weak bail laws but with failing to utilize existing laws effectively.

Behind Closed Doors

Governor Hochul met privately with DA Bragg to discuss the incident. Although Bragg was absent when Hochul emerged for a news conference with other district attorneys from Queens, Brooklyn, and Westchester, she expressed confidence that additional charges would be brought against the attackers.

Clarification from DA Bragg

Hours later, Alvin Bragg held a press conference to clarify his position. He asserted that assaults on police officers would not be tolerated. Bragg watched video footage to identify each suspect's role in the group assault.

The situation remains contentious as authorities grapple with balancing justice and public safety. The decision not to seek bail has drawn scrutiny, and further developments are anticipated as investigations continue.

This story is just mind-boggling.  There was once a time when it was a felony to attack a police officer. How times have changed!  These illegal immigrants attack two cops and then are released. It was said they fled the state of New York to California or Mexico, but this was disproved. A few of them were arrested again for other crimes.  This is just despicable.  The DA claims they did not have enough evidence to keep these thugs in jail, yet we have a clear video of the attack. What more do they need?

Luckily, pressure from fellow liberals brought the DA to charge these thugs and issue arrest warrants. They are now going to face justice and will hopefully be deported and barred from reentering the country. It is a bad time to be an NYPD officer now with these politicians in power. The Bail Reform law has empowered criminals to do this. The open borders and lawlessness there have empowered these ungrateful illegal immigrants to come here and commit crimes believing they will get scott-free.  Elections have consequences. New Yorkers and other "sanctuary cities" need to wake up. We cannot continue on this path.  

The Federal Government must also secure the border and vet whoever wants to enter this country legally. We cannot have people storming the border like a horde of zombies or walkers from the Walking Dead franchise. These thugs who attacked the NYPD officers are said to be members of gangs in South and Central America.  These are the people we are letting into our nation.  

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  

Source:

https://nypost.com/2024/02/18/us-news/who-are-the-migrants-charged-with-attacking-nypd-cops-a-look-at-the-asylum-seekers-charged-in-times-square-melee/

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/immigration-advocates-show-up-to-support-nypd-times-square-attack-suspect-yohenry-brito/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/5-asylum-seekers-arrested-assault-police-officers-times/story?id=106825390

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/02/09/new-york-police-times-square-video/

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/da-bragg-finally-addresses-why-no-bail-was-sought-for-suspects-in-nypd-times-square-attack/5100701/

https://abc7ny.com/nyc-crime-officers-attacked-time-square-nypd/14380425/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68185611

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegals-who-caught-bus-out-nyc-after-attack-police-may-have-gotten-free-ride-us-taxpayers-sources

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13088933/migrant-times-square-cops-beating-arraignment.html

https://www.mynbc5.com/article/nypd-officers-attacked-times-square/46627453

https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/16/bail-set-in-manhattan-court-for-five-migrants-accused-in-times-square-assault-on-nypd/

Yorman Reveron, NYC migrant accused of beating cops, whines as judge sets $100K bail (nypost.com)