Does Video Show Women Consecrating Bread?

 

A Video, a Misunderstanding, and the Church’s Provision for Sunday Worship Without a Priest

A short video has been circulating among Catholic traditionalist circles. It shows two lay women near the altar in what appears to be a church setting. One holds a host. Viewers, many of them English-speaking and predominantly Caucasian traditionalists, have concluded that the women are simulating the consecration, acting as if they were priests, and thus engaging in a grave liturgical abuse or worse. Comments have ranged from shocked condemnation to personal attacks on the women involved. The audio is in Brazilian Portuguese. That linguistic barrier helps explain the leap to the wrong conclusion, but it does not excuse the rush to judgment or the harsh rhetoric directed at the women.

What the video actually depicts is a recognized and regulated form of Catholic worship: a Sunday celebration in the absence of a priest, often called a Communion service or a Liturgy of the Word with distribution of Holy Communion. The hosts have already been consecrated by a priest at a previous Mass. There is no consecration taking place. The women are not pretending to be priests. They are fulfilling a role the Church herself has authorized under specific conditions when no priest is available.

This post explains the background of the misunderstanding, the nature of these celebrations, the order of the rite, who may lead them, the official permissions and norms that govern them, and why charity remains required even when liturgical practice differs from one’s own experience or preference.

 The Viral Video and the Jump to Conclusions

In regions with severe shortages of priests—common in parts of Latin America, including Brazil—communities regularly gather on Sunday even when a priest cannot reach them. The Church has long recognized this pastoral reality. Rather than leave the faithful without any communal celebration of the Lord’s Day, it provides structured ways for them to assemble, hear the Word of God, pray, and, when reserved hosts are available, receive Holy Communion.

The video shows two women performing functions within such a service. One appears to be holding or presenting a host in the context of distribution or a related moment. To someone unfamiliar with the rite and unable to understand the Portuguese explanations or prayers, the visual can look startling. Traditionalists who emphasize the exclusive role of the ordained priest in the Eucharist understandably react strongly when they believe that role is being usurped. The problem is that the belief is incorrect.

The language barrier is real. Brazilian Portuguese contains liturgical phrasing and pastoral explanations that do not match the visual assumptions of an English-speaking viewer. What may sound or look like a Eucharistic Prayer or words of institution is, in context, something else entirely—prayers of preparation, an invitation to Communion from the reserved Sacrament, or simple instructions. Jumping from an incomplete visual and untranslated audio to accusations of sacrilege or feminist infiltration is understandable as a first reaction; it is not justifiable as a sustained or public judgment.

The women themselves are not public figures seeking controversy. They are local Catholics responding to the needs of their community under the guidance of their local Church. Attacking them personally, questioning their faith, or treating them as enemies of orthodoxy goes beyond legitimate concern for liturgical integrity. Charity and accuracy both demand better.

 What a Sunday Celebration in the Absence of a Priest Actually Is

The full celebration of Sunday for Catholics is the Mass: the Liturgy of the Word joined to the Liturgy of the Eucharist, in which the priest, acting in the person of Christ, confects the Sacrament and offers the Sacrifice. Nothing replaces the Mass. The Church repeatedly insists on this.

Yet the Church also recognizes that circumstances sometimes make Mass impossible for a given community on a given Sunday. Canon law itself addresses the point. Canon 1248 §2 of the Code of Canon Law states: “If participation in the eucharistic celebration becomes impossible because of the absence of a sacred minister or for another grave cause, it is strongly recommended that the faithful take part in a liturgy of the Word if there be such in the parish church or some other sacred place, which is celebrated in accordance with the provisions laid down by the diocesan bishop; or to spend an appropriate time in prayer, whether personally or as a family or, as occasion presents, in a group of families.”

The principal official document elaborating this is the Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship on 2 June 1988 and approved by Pope John Paul II. The Directory does not invent a new form of worship or encourage the absence of priests. It responds to an existing pastoral necessity so that the Christian meaning of Sunday is not lost.

These celebrations are extraordinary, not ordinary. They are not to become a convenient substitute for Mass when a priest could reasonably be obtained. They should foster, not diminish, hunger for the Eucharist. They must carefully avoid any confusion with the Mass itself.

In practice, the preferred form in many places is a Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion from hosts previously consecrated by a priest and reserved in the tabernacle. Alternatives include a Liturgy of the Word alone or Morning or Evening Prayer from the Liturgy of the Hours, sometimes with Communion.

 The Structure of the Rite

The order carefully distinguishes the service from the Mass. Nothing proper to the Mass—especially the preparation of the gifts in the sacrificial sense or the Eucharistic Prayer—is inserted.

Typical elements include:

- Introductory rites: Gathering, sign of the cross, greeting (adapted so that a lay leader does not use the presidential formulas proper to a priest), introduction explaining that Mass cannot be celebrated today and that the community gathers to hear the Word and (if applicable) receive Communion from the reserved Sacrament, penitential act, and collect or opening prayer.

- Liturgy of the Word: The same readings as those appointed for the Sunday Mass, including the Gospel. A responsorial psalm. A period of silence or a reflection (not a formal homily by a lay person unless specifically authorized; deacons may preach). Profession of faith. General intercessions.

- Communion rite (when reserved hosts are available): The leader goes to the place of reservation, brings the ciborium or pyx to the altar (the altar is approached only at this point in many guidelines, precisely to avoid the appearance of a Mass), leads the Lord’s Prayer, the invitation to Communion (“Behold the Lamb of God…”), and distributes Holy Communion. A prayer after Communion follows. The remaining hosts are returned to the tabernacle.

- Concluding rite: Blessing (in a form appropriate to a lay leader or deacon) and dismissal.

Key visual and rubrical safeguards exist precisely to prevent the misunderstanding seen in the circulating video. The presidential chair is normally not used by a lay leader; the leader often stands among the assembly or at a different place. Vesture, if any, is distinct from priestly vestments. The language used makes clear that this is not the Mass. The Directory and subsequent national and diocesan adaptations stress that the celebration must never look or sound like a simulated Mass.

The host held by one of the women in the video is almost certainly a previously consecrated host being prepared for distribution or shown in the invitation to Communion. No words of consecration are spoken by the laity; none can be effective if spoken by them. The Sacrament remains what a priest has already made it.

 Who May Lead These Celebrations

Preference is always given to a deacon when one is available. A deacon can lead the service, proclaim the Gospel, preach, and distribute Communion as an ordinary minister.

When no deacon is present, the diocesan bishop may appoint suitable lay persons—men or women—as leaders of prayer for these celebrations. Appointment is not a casual local decision; it falls under the bishop’s authority. Leaders are to receive proper formation. The Directory and later documents such as Redemptionis Sacramentum (2004) emphasize that it is preferable to distribute the various roles among several members of the faithful rather than have one lay person appear to “preside” in the manner of a priest. No lay person is ever to be referred to as “presiding” over the celebration in the same sense.

Women have long served in these roles in mission territories and in areas of priest shortage, including parts of Brazil, Portugal, Africa, and elsewhere. This is not a novelty of recent decades or an innovation driven by ideology; it is a practical application of the Church’s norms in concrete circumstances. The same norms apply regardless of the sex of the appointed leader.

Extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion may assist with distribution under the usual conditions. The hosts remain those consecrated by a priest.

 Official Permissions, Laws, and Rubrics

The foundational texts are clear:

- Code of Canon Law, can. 1248 §2 (quoted above).

- Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (Congregation for Divine Worship, 2 June 1988). It outlines the conditions under which such celebrations may be authorized, the theological importance of Sunday, the need to avoid confusion with the Mass, the preference for deacons, the possibility of appointed lay leaders, and the basic structure of the celebration of the Word with Communion.

- Redemptionis Sacramentum (Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 25 March 2004), especially nos. 162–167 on particular celebrations in the absence of a priest. These paragraphs reaffirm that such celebrations are extraordinary, that confusion with the Mass must be avoided, that the diocesan bishop regulates them, that Communion may be distributed according to his prudent judgment, and that roles should be shared among the faithful when no priest or deacon is present. They also insist that those leading keep alive a true hunger for the Eucharist.

National bishops’ conferences and individual dioceses issue more detailed directives adapting the Directory to local circumstances. In Brazil and other Portuguese-speaking regions, corresponding guidelines exist and have been in use for years. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has published ritual editions of Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest. Similar provisions appear in Australia, England and Wales, and many other places.

These are not loopholes or progressive experiments. They are the Church’s own response to the scarcity of priests while safeguarding the unique character of the Mass and the ministerial priesthood.

 Charity, Accuracy, and the Larger Context

Priest shortages are a real and growing pastoral challenge in many parts of the world. Blaming the women in the video for responding to that challenge under the Church’s norms solves nothing. Misidentifying a Communion service as a simulated consecration spreads confusion rather than clarity. Public attacks that treat the women as ideological actors rather than local Catholics doing what their bishop and the universal norms allow are unjust.

Traditionalists rightly defend the centrality of the Mass, the exclusive power of the ordained priest to confect the Eucharist, and the need for reverence and clarity in liturgy. Those concerns are valid. They are best served by accurate knowledge of what the Church actually permits and by restraint in judgment when evidence is incomplete, especially when a language barrier is involved.

The women in the video are not the enemy of orthodoxy. In the concrete circumstances of their community, they are helping the faithful keep Sunday as the Lord’s Day to the extent possible until a priest can be present. That is the purpose the Directory itself assigns to these celebrations.

Understanding the rite, the norms that authorize it, and the difference between reserved Communion and consecration removes the basis for the false accusation. Charity then requires that we stop treating the women as if they had committed the offense that was mistakenly attributed to them.

Sunday remains the day of the Resurrection. The Mass remains its fullest celebration. When the Mass cannot be had, the Church still provides a way for the community to gather around the Word and the reserved Sacrament. That provision is not a threat to the priesthood; it is a pastoral response that assumes the priesthood’s irreplaceable role.

The circulating video does not show women pretending to be priests. It shows a permitted form of Sunday worship under the norms of the Catholic Church. Accurate knowledge and Christian charity are the proper responses.

 References

- Code of Canon Law (1983), can. 1248 §2.

- Congregation for Divine Worship, Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (2 June 1988).

- Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Redemptionis Sacramentum (25 March 2004), especially nos. 162–167.

- Sacrosanctum Concilium (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy), art. 106 (on the importance of Sunday).

- United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (ritual editions, various revisions conforming to the third edition of the Roman Missal).

- Diocesan and national guidelines implementing the 1988 Directory (examples available from various bishops’ conferences, including those in Portuguese-speaking regions).

- Related texts: Holy Communion and Worship of the Eucharist Outside Mass (ritual), and relevant canons on extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion (can. 910, 230 §3).

Gay Pride Mass at Stonewall

 

Gay Pride Mass at Stonewall: The Smell of the Sheep and the Medicine of Mercy

In the heart of New York City’s Greenwich Village, where the Stonewall Inn stands as a landmark of resistance and identity for the LGBTQ+ community, a Catholic Mass was celebrated amid Pride celebrations. For many Catholics, the optics can seem jarring—rainbow flags, secular Pride events, and the ancient liturgy sharing the same space. Questions arise: Is this appropriate? Does it compromise the Church’s teaching? Yet as I reflect on it, two things come immediately to mind: the smell of the sheep and the unmistakable example of Jesus eating with sinners.

Pope Francis has often spoken of pastors who carry “the smell of the sheep.” It is a vivid image of a Church that does not remain distant or antiseptic, but one that goes out to where people actually are—flawed, searching, wounded, and sometimes far from the ideal. The Good Shepherd leaves the ninety-nine to find the one lost. He does not wait for the sheep to clean itself up perfectly before approaching. He draws near first.

Jesus Himself modeled this scandalous closeness. The Pharisees grumbled because He ate with tax collectors and sinners. They saw compromised optics; He saw souls in need of mercy. “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick,” He said. Time and again, Christ’s ministry was marked by table fellowship with those society judged most harshly. He did not begin with condemnation but with presence, healing, and invitation to conversion. The Church exists to continue that mission.

This brings us to the heart of why such a Mass matters, even when it invites criticism. Pope Francis captured it powerfully in Evangelii Gaudium (2013), paragraph 47:

> “The Eucharist, although it is the fullness of sacramental life, is not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak.”

The Church is not a museum for saints but a field hospital for the wounded. In a world full of division, isolation, and moral confusion, the Mass at Stonewall represents an attempt to bring the medicine of the Eucharist precisely where people may feel most alienated or most in need. It is an act of accompaniment—meeting people in their reality rather than demanding they achieve perfection before entering the door.

Critics will rightly note that the Church’s teaching on sexuality and marriage has not changed and cannot change. Mercy without truth is sentimentality; truth without mercy is harsh legalism. The genius of the Catholic approach is to hold both in tension: clear doctrine paired with radical, personal outreach. Ministering to those who experience same-sex attraction does not mean endorsing every aspect of Pride culture. It means witnessing to the dignity of every person made in God’s image, offering the sacraments as strength for the journey, and trusting the Holy Spirit to lead hearts toward holiness over time.

The field hospital does not ask the bleeding soldier for his papers or demand he recite the full catechism before bandaging his wounds. It stops the bleeding, nourishes the body, and then begins the deeper work of healing and conversion. That is the logic of evangelization. That is the logic of the Incarnation—God entering our messy reality rather than calling down from afar.

As Catholics, we are called to be both faithful to revelation and generous in mercy. Events like the Pride Mass at Stonewall test that balance. They may look messy. They may invite misunderstanding. But they also echo the Lord’s own table fellowship and Francis’s call for a Church that smells like the sheep—close to the people entrusted to her care.

In the end, the Eucharist is not a reward for arriving at the destination. It is food for the journey. May more souls, whatever their struggles, find nourishment there, encounter Christ in His mercy, and be drawn ever closer to the fullness of life He offers. 

That is the purpose of the Catholic Church: to seek the lost, heal the wounded, and proclaim the Gospel to every person—starting right where they are.

Solemnity of the Body & Blood of Jesus Christ

A Reflection on the Solemnity of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ (Corpus Christi) – June 7, 2026

Today the Church celebrates the Solemnity of Corpus Christi, a feast dedicated entirely to the mystery of the Holy Eucharist—Jesus Christ truly, really, and substantially present in the Blessed Sacrament: Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. The readings invite us to ponder God’s providential care, the unity we share in the one Bread, and the astonishing promise of eternal life through feeding on the living Bread from heaven.

 The Readings

- Deuteronomy 8:2-3, 14b-16a recalls how God humbled the Israelites with hunger in the desert and fed them with manna—“a food unknown to you and your fathers”—to teach them that “not by bread alone does one live, but by every word that comes forth from the mouth of the LORD.” This prefigures the true Bread that would come down from heaven.

- Psalm 147 praises Jerusalem (the Church) for the peace and finest wheat God provides.

- 1 Corinthians 10:16-17 proclaims the profound unity: “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? Because the loaf of bread is one, we, though many, are one body.”

- John 6:51-58 contains Jesus’ bold declaration: “I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world… My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.”

These passages echo through the Sequence Lauda Sion, composed by St. Thomas Aquinas, which beautifully unfolds the theology of the Eucharist.

 What Is Corpus Christi?

Corpus Christi (“Body of Christ”) is the solemn feast honoring the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist. It celebrates the miracle of transubstantiation: by the power of the Holy Spirit and the words of consecration, the substance of bread and wine becomes the substance of Christ’s Body and Blood, while the appearances (accidents) remain. It is not a symbol or mere memorial; it is Jesus Himself—truly present and offered to us as food for eternal life.

 History of the Feast

The feast originated in the 13th century through St. Juliana of Liège, a Norbertine canoness who had visions urging a special day to honor the Eucharist, as the Church calendar lacked one focused solely on it. A Eucharistic miracle in Bolsena (1263), where the Host bled during Mass, further confirmed the need. Pope Urban IV instituted the feast for the universal Church in 1264 via the bull Transiturus de hoc mundo. St. Thomas Aquinas composed the liturgy and hymns, including Pange Lingua and Lauda Sion. It quickly spread, becoming marked by grand processions that publicly witness faith in the Real Presence.

 Apologetics for the Holy Eucharist

The doctrine of the Real Presence rests firmly on Scripture and Tradition. In John 6, Jesus repeatedly insists on eating His flesh and drinking His blood—language that shocked listeners, yet He did not soften it when many walked away. At the Last Supper, He said, “This is my body… This is my blood,” not “this represents.” St. Paul warns that unworthy reception profanes the Body and Blood of the Lord (1 Cor 11:27-29), implying a real presence, not a symbol.

The early Church Fathers unanimously affirmed this: St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 110 AD) called the Eucharist “the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ,” and St. Justin Martyr described it as the food that becomes our flesh and blood through transformation. The Church has consistently taught transubstantiation as the best explanation of this mystery, defined at the Council of Trent. Eucharistic miracles throughout history (e.g., Bolsena, Lanciano) continue to affirm what faith already believes.

 Ways to Worship Jesus in the Eucharist

The Eucharist is not only received at Mass but adored outside it. Here are powerful practices:

- Eucharistic Adoration: Spend time before the exposed Blessed Sacrament in a monstrance. Simply be with Jesus—speak to Him, listen in silence, or use structured prayer. A “Holy Hour” is especially fruitful: offer praise, thanksgiving, contrition, and petition (the traditional ACTS). Pray the Rosary, read Scripture, or journal. Many find deep peace, clarity, and healing here.

- Eucharistic Processions: Especially on Corpus Christi, parishes carry the Blessed Sacrament through streets under a canopy, with hymns, incense, and flowers. This public witness proclaims, “Our God is with us!” Join one if available—it strengthens faith and evangelizes.

- Holy Hours and Perpetual Adoration: Many parishes offer scheduled or 24/7 adoration. Committing to a weekly hour transforms lives by centering them on Christ.

- Visits to the Tabernacle: Even brief stops to genuflect, pray, or say “Jesus, I trust in You” bring immense grace.

- Spiritual Communion: When unable to receive sacramentally, pray for Jesus to come spiritually into your heart.

On this Corpus Christi, let us thank the Lord for the gift of Himself. May we hunger for the Eucharist as the Israelites hungered for manna, receive Him worthily, and adore Him fervently. As the Sequence sings: “Very bread, good shepherd, tend us… In the land of life to see.” 

Jesus, truly present in the Most Holy Eucharist, increase our faith, deepen our love, and draw us ever closer to You. Amen.

June: The Month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus – A Profound Invitation to Love, Reparation, and Eucharistic Union

June: The Month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus – A Profound Invitation to Love, Reparation, and Eucharistic Union

Dear friends in Christ, as we enter the beautiful month of June, the Church invites us to immerse ourselves in one of the most tender and powerful devotions in the Catholic tradition: the Sacred Heart of Jesus. June has long been dedicated to the Most Sacred Heart of Our Lord, a devotion that calls us to contemplate the infinite love of God made flesh, a love that beats eternally for each one of us. This month is not merely a calendar observance but a spiritual journey into the very core of Christ's humanity and divinity, where we encounter the burning furnace of charity that is His Heart.

The Feast of the Sacred Heart falls on the Friday following the second Sunday after Pentecost, often closely connected to Corpus Christi, underscoring the profound link between the Heart of Jesus and the Holy Eucharist. In this long reflection, we will explore the history, theology, scriptural foundations, patristic teachings, and practical applications of this devotion, with a special emphasis on how it draws us deeper into the mystery of the Blessed Sacrament – the real, substantial presence of Christ, Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. May this month transform our hearts to resemble His.

 The Historical Roots and Development of the Devotion

Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus has ancient roots, traceable to the early Church's meditation on the pierced side of Christ from which blood and water flowed (John 19:34). However, it blossomed more explicitly in the Middle Ages through saints like St. Gertrude the Great and St. Mechtilde, who experienced mystical unions with the Heart of Christ.

The modern form of the devotion, however, was entrusted to the world through St. Margaret Mary Alacoque (1647–1690), a Visitation nun in Paray-le-Monial, France. Between 1673 and 1675, Our Lord appeared to her multiple times, revealing His Heart aflame with love, encircled by thorns, surmounted by a cross, and wounded by human indifference. In one pivotal apparition, Jesus said: "Behold this Heart which has so loved men that it has spared nothing, even to exhausting and consuming Itself, in order to testify Its love; and in return, I receive from the greater part only ingratitude, by their irreverence and sacrilege, and by the coldness and contempt they have for Me in this Sacrament of Love."

This explicit connection to the Eucharist is central. Jesus appeared often during Eucharistic adoration or preparation for Communion. He requested the establishment of a feast in honor of His Heart on the Friday after the Octave of Corpus Christi, emphasizing reparation for offenses against the Sacrament of His Love. Pope Pius IX extended the feast to the universal Church in 1856, and the entire month of June gradually became associated with intensified devotion, with roots traceable to around 1790.

Popes have championed this devotion vigorously. Pope Leo XIII, in his 1899 encyclical Annum Sacrum, consecrated the entire human race to the Sacred Heart, calling it a "great act" for the salvation of the world. He wrote that the Sacred Heart is the "symbol and sensible image of the infinite love of Jesus Christ." Pope Pius XI further developed this in Miserentissimus Redemptor (1928), stressing reparation. These teachings remind us that honoring the Heart is not sentimentalism but a dogmatic response to divine love manifested in the Incarnation and perpetuated in the Eucharist.

 Theological Depth: The Sacred Heart as Symbol of Divine Love

The Sacred Heart represents the totality of Christ's person – His divine love united to a human heart. As the Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy explains, it denotes "the entire mystery of Christ, the totality of his being, and his person considered in its most intimate essential: Son of God, uncreated wisdom; infinite charity."

Scripture richly supports this. In the Old Testament, we see foreshadowings. The Psalmist cries, "My heart is like wax, it is melted within my breast" (Psalm 22:14), prophetically describing the suffering Messiah. Ezekiel promises a new heart: "I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh" (Ezekiel 36:26). This finds fulfillment in Christ.

In the New Testament, Jesus Himself invites us: "Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart" (Matthew 11:28-29). At the Last Supper, the beloved disciple John reclines on Jesus' breast (John 13:23), listening to the heartbeat of God. On the Cross, the soldier's lance pierces His side: "one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water" (John 19:34). The Fathers saw this as the birth of the Church and the sacraments, especially Baptism and Eucharist, flowing from the Heart.

St. John further records Jesus' words: "If any one thirst, let him come to me and drink. He who believes in me, as the scripture has said, 'Out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water'" (John 7:37-38). This living water is the Holy Spirit, but also points to the Eucharistic grace poured forth from Christ's Heart.

The Sacred Heart, therefore, is not a detached symbol but the font from which the Eucharist springs. The Eucharist is the "Sacrament of Love," as Jesus called it to St. Margaret Mary – His Heart given entirely to us. In every Mass, Christ renews the self-gift of Calvary, offering His Heart pierced for love. Eucharistic miracles, such as Lanciano, where the Host became flesh identified as heart tissue, underscore this reality.

 The Holy Eucharist: The Supreme Expression of the Sacred Heart

The connection between the Sacred Heart and the Holy Eucharist is inseparable. Jesus' revelations to St. Margaret Mary occurred in the context of the Blessed Sacrament. He complained of coldness and sacrileges against the Eucharist and asked for First Friday Communions and Holy Hours of reparation as remedies.

Theologically, the Eucharist is the extension of the Incarnation. In the Incarnation, the Word took a human Heart; in the Eucharist, that same Heart – now glorified – is truly present under the species of bread and wine. As one reflection notes, "Devotion to the Sacred Heart and Eucharistic devotion are inseparable... The Eucharist stems from his heart." Christ longs to eat the Passover with us (Luke 22:15), fulfilling this in the Mass.

Church teaching echoes this. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 1323) calls the Eucharist "the source and summit of the Christian life," mirroring how the Sacred Heart is the source of all graces. Pope St. John Paul II and others have promoted Eucharistic adoration as a direct encounter with the Heart of Jesus. In adoration, we gaze upon the veiled Heart that beats with love, hidden yet real.

To emphasize: receiving Holy Communion is receiving the Sacred Heart. It is not symbolic but substantial. The accidents of bread and wine remain, but the substance is Christ – His Heart included in the hypostatic union. This union transforms us, as St. Augustine heard Christ say, "I am the food of the mature... Grow and you shall eat me. You will not change me into yourself, but I will change you into me." Our cold hearts become like His through frequent, worthy reception.

 Teachings of the Church Fathers on the Heart, Love, and Eucharist

The early Church Fathers, though not using the exact term "Sacred Heart," laid the foundation through their profound Eucharistic realism and contemplation of Christ's love.

St. Ignatius of Antioch (d. c. 107), in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans, affirms: "The Eucharist is the flesh of Our Saviour Jesus Christ, who suffered for our sins." He links it to the unity of the Church, flowing from Christ's sacrificial love – the love of His Heart.

St. Justin Martyr (c. 100–165) describes the Eucharist in his First Apology: "We do not receive these things as common bread or common drink; but... the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word... is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh." This real presence is the gift of the Heart that loved us unto death.

St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202) in Against Heresies teaches that the bread and wine become the Body and Blood of Christ, nourishing us for resurrection. He sees the Eucharist as the recapitulation of creation in Christ's obedient love – the love symbolized by His Heart. "Our opinion is in accordance with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist in turn establishes our opinion."

St. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 313–386) in his Mystagogical Catecheses exhorts: "Do not regard the Bread and the Wine as simply that; for they are, according to the Master's declaration, the Body and Blood of Christ. For even though the senses suggest this to you, let faith establish you." He connects this to the pierced side and the outpouring of grace.

St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430) beautifully integrates love and the Eucharist: "The Eucharist is our daily bread... Christ is both the One who eats and the One who is eaten." In his Tractates on John, he reflects on the pierced side as the door to the sacraments. Augustine's emphasis on charity – love – flows directly from contemplating Christ's self-giving Heart in the Sacrament.

St. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407) preached: "When you see the Lord immolated and lying upon the altar, and the priest bent over that sacrifice... think that you are present at the Last Supper." He urges reverence for the Eucharist as the ultimate act of divine love.

These Fathers teach us that the Eucharist is no mere memorial but the living memorial of the Heart of Christ, wounded yet triumphant. Their realism counters any spiritualization that would diminish the devotion.

 Practices for the Month of June: Living the Devotion

To live this month fruitfully:

1. Daily Consecration and Litany: Begin each day with the Act of Consecration to the Sacred Heart and pray the Litany of the Sacred Heart.

2. First Fridays: Attend Mass and receive Communion on the First Friday, making reparation as requested.

3. Eucharistic Adoration: Spend time in Holy Hours, contemplating the Heart hidden in the Tabernacle.

4. Enthronement: Enthrone an image of the Sacred Heart in your home, making it the King of your family.

5. Acts of Reparation: Offer sacrifices for offenses against the Eucharist and the Heart.

6. Scriptural Meditation: Daily read passages like John 19, Matthew 11, and John 6 (the Bread of Life discourse).

7. Charity: Perform works of mercy, as love of the Heart manifests in love of neighbor.

These practices foster intimacy with Christ. As Jesus promised to St. Margaret Mary, they bring graces: peace in families, consolation in afflictions, and final perseverance.

 Deeper Reflections: Why This Matters Today

In a world of hardened hearts, division, and secularism – where June is often co-opted for other causes – reclaiming it for the Sacred Heart is prophetic. The Heart of Jesus burns with mercy for sinners, healing for the wounded, and fire for the lukewarm. The Eucharist, source of this grace, counters isolation with communion.

Consider the promises: "I will give them all the graces necessary for their state of life... I will establish peace in their families... I will console them in all their troubles." These flow from the Heart that knows our struggles.

The Fathers and saints urge us onward. St. Thomas Aquinas, though later, synthesized: the Eucharist perfects charity. Earlier, Origen and others meditated on the "wound of love" in Christ's side. We are called to enter that wound, as St. Margaret Mary was invited.

Let us not be among those who offer only ingratitude. Instead, respond with total gift. Consecrate your life, family, and nation anew to the Sacred Heart. In the Eucharist, let your heart beat in unison with His.

 Conclusion: A Call to Eucharistic Hearts

As June unfolds, may the Sacred Heart of Jesus inflame our souls. Through the intercession of St. Margaret Mary, the Blessed Virgin Mary (whose Immaculate Heart is united to His), and all the saints, let us draw near to the Tabernacle. There, the same Heart that was pierced on Calvary waits – patient, loving, eager to transform us.

The month of the Sacred Heart is an invitation to fall in love again with the God who first loved us (1 John 4:19). In the Holy Eucharist, we receive this love without measure. "Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us. Make our hearts like unto Thine."

May this devotion renew the Church and the world in these challenging times. Jesus, meek and humble of Heart, make our hearts like Yours. Amen.

 References

- Holy Bible (various translations, esp. RSVCE, NABRE).

- Annum Sacrum, Pope Leo XIII (1899).

- Writings of St. Margaret Mary Alacoque.

- Miserentissimus Redemptor, Pope Pius XI.

- Catechism of the Catholic Church.

- Church Fathers: Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Augustine, Cyril of Jerusalem, John Chrysostom (as cited from collections like EWTN and New Advent).

- Wikipedia and Catholic Culture overviews on the Month of the Sacred Heart (for historical context).

- Various pastoral articles from diocesan sites and EWTN.

All citations drawn from reliable Catholic sources. For deeper study, consult the original papal documents and patristic texts.

The Ascension of the Lord: He Ascends, Yet Remains With Us

The Ascension of the Lord: He Ascends, Yet Remains With Us

 The Story of the Ascension

Forty days after His glorious Resurrection from the dead, Jesus gathered His apostles one last time. He had appeared to them repeatedly, proving that He was truly alive—eating with them, speaking of the Kingdom of God, and preparing them for what was to come. On this day, on the Mount of Olives near Jerusalem, He gave them final instructions: "You will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, throughout Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth" (Acts 1:8).

As they watched, He was lifted up before their eyes, and a cloud took Him from their sight. The apostles stood there, gazing into the sky in amazement. Suddenly, two men in white garments appeared beside them and said, “Men of Galilee, why are you standing there looking at the sky? This Jesus who has been taken up from you into heaven will return in the same way as you have seen him going into heaven” (Acts 1:11).

This event, known as the Ascension of the Lord, marks the end of Jesus’ visible earthly ministry and the beginning of the Church’s mission. It is not a farewell of abandonment, but a triumphant return to the Father, where Christ is enthroned as King.

 Catholic Readings for the Ascension of the Lord (Year A)

First Reading: Acts 1:1-11 – Luke recounts how Jesus instructed the apostles to wait for the Holy Spirit and was then taken up into heaven.

Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 47:2-3, 6-7, 8-9  

R. God mounts his throne to shouts of joy: a blare of trumpets for the Lord.  

All you peoples, clap your hands, shout to God with cries of gladness... God mounts his throne amid shouts of joy; the LORD, amid trumpet blasts. Sing praise to God, sing praise... For king of all the earth is God.

Second Reading: Ephesians 1:17-23 – St. Paul prays that we may know the hope of our calling and the immeasurable power of God at work in us—the same power that raised Christ from the dead and seated Him at the Father’s right hand, far above every authority.

Gospel: Matthew 28:16-20 – The eleven disciples go to Galilee, where the risen Jesus commissions them: “All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age.”

 A Reflection on the Ascension

The Ascension invites us to lift our eyes beyond the troubles of this world. Jesus does not leave us orphaned; He ascends to prepare a place for us and to send the Holy Spirit, who empowers the Church to carry on His work. In the Gospel, we see the disciples worshiping yet still doubting—much like us at times. Yet Jesus approaches them tenderly and entrusts them (and us) with the Great Commission.

This feast reminds us that our faith is not confined to earth. Christ’s humanity is now glorified in heaven, showing us our own destiny: to share in His resurrection and eternal life. As St. Paul tells us in Ephesians, we are part of Christ’s Body, the Church, with Him as our Head. His victory is ours.

Did Jesus Abandon Us? Absolutely Not.

Some might wonder, as the apostles perhaps did in that moment of awe: Has Jesus left us behind? The answer is a resounding no. He promised, “I am with you always, until the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20). This presence is not distant or abstract. Jesus remains intimately with us in the Most Holy Eucharist—His Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity truly present in every tabernacle and at every Mass. In the Eucharist, the same Jesus who ascended is here among us, nourishing us, forgiving us, and uniting us to the Father.

He is also with us through the Holy Spirit, who guides the Church, through the Sacraments, in Sacred Scripture, and in the community of believers. Just as the angels assured the apostles that Jesus would return “in the same way,” we live in joyful expectation of His Second Coming, when He will judge the living and the dead and establish His Kingdom fully.

Until that day, we are called to be His witnesses—to live the Gospel, make disciples, and bring hope to a world that desperately needs it. The Ascension is not an ending; it is a new beginning for us all.

May the ascended Lord bless you, strengthen you in faith, and fill you with the joy of knowing He is with us always. Come, Lord Jesus!

A Troubling Incident: Communion Given to Dogs in a Swiss Diocese

 

A Troubling Incident: Communion Given to Dogs in a Swiss Diocese

In October 2025, a pet blessing event at Good Shepherd Parish (Guthirt) in Zurich, part of the Diocese of Chur in Switzerland, took an unexpected and controversial turn. Due to poor weather, organizers moved the outdoor animal blessing indoors and combined it with a Eucharistic celebration (Mass). During this liturgy, three parishioners shared portions of their consecrated hosts—the Blessed Sacrament—with their dogs.

News of the incident spread, prompting Bishop Joseph Maria Bonnemain of the Diocese of Chur to launch a formal investigation. The diocese released its findings on April 17, 2026.

 The Diocese's Response

The diocese concluded that the three individuals did not act with sacrilegious intent. Therefore, they did not incur the penalty of automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See under Canon 1367 of the Code of Canon Law, which addresses throwing away consecrated species or taking/keeping them for sacrilegious purposes.

Bishop Bonnemain’s statement emphasized that the actions, while “deeply regrettable,” lacked the deliberate intent required for a canonical delict (crime). The investigation reportedly relied on more than hearsay but focused heavily on subjective intent. The diocese arranged a retreat for the parish team to study Pope Francis’s apostolic exhortation Desiderio desideravi on the Eucharist more deeply. Some local Catholic voices, such as SwissCath, expressed skepticism about the thoroughness of the probe and whether parish leadership bore any responsibility.

The incident has drawn widespread criticism from Catholics concerned about reverence for the Eucharist.

 Why Non-Human Animals Cannot Receive Holy Communion

Catholic teaching is clear: the Sacrament of the Eucharist is reserved exclusively for baptized human beings capable of faith. Here’s why, rooted in Scripture, Tradition, and theology:

- Sacraments require faith: The Eucharist is not mere food or a symbol but the Real Presence of Christ—His Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. Receiving it sacramentally unites the believer with Christ through faith. Animals, as non-rational creatures, lack the intellect and will to exercise faith or enter into a personal relationship with God. St. Thomas Aquinas addressed this directly: a brute animal consuming the Eucharistic species would not receive Holy Communion, because sacraments are ordered toward faith.

- Biblical precedent: Jesus Himself warned, “Do not give dogs what is holy; do not throw your pearls to pigs” (Matthew 7:6). This underscores the need for reverence and discernment in handling sacred things.

- Anthropological distinction: Only humans are made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:26-27) with a rational soul capable of knowing and loving God. Animals have souls (animating principles) but not immortal, rational souls destined for eternal communion with God through grace. They cannot sin, receive sanctifying grace in the same way, or participate in the Church’s sacramental life.

- Church discipline and canon law: The Church’s norms protect the dignity of the Eucharist. Giving it to animals constitutes irreverence or desecration, even if unintentional. Proper reverence demands that consecrated hosts be consumed only by those who can receive them worthily.

Animal blessings are a wholesome tradition (St. Francis of Assisi loved God’s creatures), but they must never blur the line between blessing creation and profaning the sacraments.

This incident highlights ongoing challenges in parts of the Church regarding Eucharistic reverence, catechesis, and liturgical boundaries. It serves as a reminder that good intentions do not always excuse actions that risk scandal or diminish the sacred.

Let us pray for greater reverence for the Blessed Sacrament and for all involved in this matter.

 Sources

- The Pillar: “Swiss Catholics out of doghouse over Eucharistic sharing” (April 27, 2026)

- LifeSiteNews: Analysis of the Diocese of Chur investigation (April 28, 2026)

- Code of Canon Law, Canon 1367

- St. Thomas Aquinas on the sacraments and faith

- Catechism of the Catholic Church (on human dignity and creation)

The Road to Emmaus: Recognizing Christ in the Breaking of the Bread, Not Merely in Words

The Road to Emmaus: Recognizing Christ in the Breaking of the Bread, Not Merely in Words

On that first Easter Sunday, two disciples walked the road from Jerusalem to Emmaus, their hearts heavy with disappointment and confusion. The man they had hoped was the Messiah had been crucified. Their dreams lay shattered. A stranger joined them on the journey, and as they conversed, He opened the Scriptures to them, explaining how the prophets foretold the suffering and glory of the Christ. Yet it was not in the explanation of the Word alone that their eyes were opened. It was only when the stranger "took the bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them" (Luke 24:30) that "their eyes were opened and they recognized him" (Luke 24:31). He vanished from their sight, but they exclaimed, "Were not our hearts burning within us while he spoke to us on the way and opened the Scriptures to us?" (Luke 24:32). They immediately returned to Jerusalem to tell the others: "The Lord has truly been raised and has appeared to Simon!" (Luke 24:34). And they recounted "what had happened on the way and how he was known to them in the breaking of the bread" (Luke 24:35).

This profound episode from Luke's Gospel is not merely a charming resurrection appearance story. It is a blueprint for how Christ continues to make Himself known to His Church. The apostles—and by extension, all believers—encounter the risen Lord primarily in the Eucharist, the true presence of Jesus' Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity under the appearances of bread and wine. The Scriptures play an essential preparatory role, kindling faith and understanding, but recognition and intimate communion occur in the breaking of the bread. This truth stands at the heart of Catholic teaching and worship. Yet many Protestants, emphasizing sola scriptura (Scripture alone), have downplayed or denied this Real Presence, prioritizing a written book compiled centuries later over the living Sacrament instituted by Christ Himself.

 Unpacking the Emmaus Narrative: Liturgy in Miniature

The Road to Emmaus account unfolds like a miniature Mass. The disciples are on a journey—much like our pilgrimage through life. They are downcast, much as we can be amid trials. The unrecognized Jesus draws near, as He does in every liturgy through the priest acting in persona Christi. He explains the Scriptures, corresponding to the Liturgy of the Word. Their hearts burn, but full recognition awaits the table. Jesus takes bread, blesses it, breaks it, and gives it—echoing the words and actions of the Last Supper (Luke 22:19). At that precise moment, their eyes open. This is no coincidence. Luke uses Eucharistic language deliberately: "took... blessed... broke... gave." These verbs mirror the feeding of the five thousand and the institution of the Eucharist.

Early Church Fathers and modern Catholic theologians, such as Scott Hahn and Brant Pitre, see this as intentional. The Catechism of the Catholic Church notes that the Eucharistic celebration includes the proclamation of the Word, thanksgiving, consecration, and participation in the banquet (CCC 1408). Emmaus encapsulates this "one single act of worship." The disciples did not say, "We recognized Him in the brilliant exegesis of the prophets." They said He was "known to them in the breaking of the bread." The Word prepares; the Sacrament fulfills and reveals.

Imagine the scene in vivid detail. The sun dips low over the Judean hills as the three travelers approach Emmaus, about seven miles from Jerusalem. Cleopas and his companion (possibly his wife) pour out their grief to the stranger. Jesus rebukes their slowness to believe but does so with patience, walking alongside them. He begins with Moses and all the prophets, showing how the Messiah must suffer and enter glory. This sermon—often called the greatest never recorded—ignites hope. Yet intellectual assent alone does not suffice for full encounter. Hospitality leads to table fellowship. The stranger assumes the role of host, performing the actions of the Eucharist. In that instant, the veil lifts. The Resurrected One stands before them, truly present. Joy replaces sorrow. They rush back in the dark, transformed.

This pattern repeats in the Acts of the Apostles and early Christian writings. The early Church gathered for the "breaking of the bread" (Acts 2:42), not merely Bible studies. The Eucharist was central from the beginning.

 The Real Presence: Apostolic and Patristic Witness

Jesus instituted the Eucharist at the Last Supper: "This is my body... This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" (Matthew 26:26-28). He commanded, "Do this in remembrance of me" (Luke 22:19). St. Paul reinforces this in 1 Corinthians 11, warning against unworthy reception because it is truly the Body and Blood. John 6's Bread of Life discourse scandalized listeners when Jesus insisted they must eat His flesh and drink His blood for eternal life. Many left Him; the apostles stayed.

The early Church unanimously affirmed the Real Presence. St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 110 AD), disciple of John the Apostle, wrote: "They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in His goodness, raised up again." He called it "the medicine of immortality."

St. Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD) explained in his First Apology: "Not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but... the food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer... is both the flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus." This was no symbol for the early Christians. It was the living Christ.

St. Cyril of Jerusalem, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and countless others echoed this. The belief was universal until the Reformation. Protestants who claim the early Church was "symbolic" ignore this overwhelming patristic consensus. The Road to Emmaus models exactly what these Fathers experienced: Christ known in the breaking of the bread.

 Protestant Emphasis on the Word: A Historical and Theological Shift

The Reformation brought sola scriptura, elevating the Bible as the sole infallible authority. While Scripture is inspired and vital (2 Timothy 3:16), this approach often sidelines the Eucharist. Many Protestant traditions view Communion as a memorial ordinance or symbolic meal, denying the substantial Real Presence. Lutherans retain a form of presence (consubstantiation or sacramental union), but Reformed, Baptist, and evangelical groups largely see it as figurative.

This creates an imbalance. Protestants flock to dynamic preaching, Bible studies, and personal devotion to the "Word," but often lack the intimate, sacramental encounter Jesus modeled at Emmaus. The irony is stark: the very book they prioritize was not directly mandated by Jesus as a compiled volume. Jesus established the Church, gave the apostles authority to teach and forgive sins (Matthew 16:18-19; John 20:23), and instituted the Sacraments, especially the Eucharist as the "source and summit" of Christian life.

Jesus never said, "Write a book and distribute it." He said, "Teach all nations" (Matthew 28:19) and "Do this" regarding the bread and wine. The New Testament writings emerged organically from the apostolic Church's life, worship, and needs. The canon—the official list of inspired books—was discerned by the Catholic Church over centuries.

 The Catholic Church and the Canon: Pope Damasus and the Council of Rome (382 AD)

The Bible as we know it did not drop from heaven. The early Church used the Septuagint (Greek Old Testament, including deuterocanonical books) and various apostolic letters and Gospels. Disagreements arose over which books were inspired. Pope Damasus I (366-384 AD) convened the Council of Rome in 382 AD, which produced a decree listing the canonical books—identical to the 73-book Catholic canon affirmed later at Trent. This included the deuterocanonicals (Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, 1-2 Maccabees) that Protestants later removed.

Damasus also commissioned St. Jerome to translate the Scriptures into Latin, producing the Vulgate, the Church's standard for over a millennium. This was no arbitrary decision by "men." It was the Holy Spirit guiding the Church that Christ founded (1 Timothy 3:15 calls the Church the "pillar and bulwark of the truth"). The same apostolic authority that produced the New Testament discerned its canon. Protestants accept the 27 New Testament books on the authority of this Catholic process but reject the Church's role in the full canon and its teaching on the Eucharist.

Critics note debates on the exact historicity of the 382 decree (some link parts to the later Gelasian Decree), but the substance holds: the Catholic Church, under papal leadership, settled the canon. Jesus entrusted this authority to Peter and the apostles, not to a future collection of writings. The Word of God is first and foremost Jesus Himself (John 1:1, 14), then the oral apostolic Tradition, and the written Scriptures interpreted by the Church.

 Why the Eucharist Matters: Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity

Catholic doctrine holds that in the Eucharist, by the power of the Holy Spirit and the words of consecration spoken by the ordained priest, the substance of bread and wine becomes the substance of Christ's Body and Blood while the appearances (accidents) remain. This is transubstantiation, defined at the Fourth Lateran Council and Trent. It is not cannibalism or magic but a sacramental mystery. Christ is truly, really, and substantially present.

This fulfills John 6: "My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him." It unites us to the once-for-all sacrifice of Calvary, making it present. It forgives venial sins, strengthens against temptation, and unites the Church as one Body. The Road to Emmaus shows this presence transforms despair into mission. The disciples, once fleeing, become evangelists.

Protestant alternatives—memorialism, spiritual presence—cannot account for the early Church's reverence, the miracles associated with the Eucharist, or Jesus' plain words. If it were merely symbolic, why the strong language causing disciples to leave? Why Paul's warnings of judgment for unworthy reception (1 Corinthians 11:27-29)? Emmaus proves the point: recognition comes in the breaking, not endless discussion.

 Living the Emmaus Experience Today

Every Catholic Mass replays Emmaus. We bring our burdens. The Liturgy of the Word opens the Scriptures, and our hearts burn. Then, in the Liturgy of the Eucharist, Christ takes, blesses, breaks, and gives Himself. We receive Him—Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. Our eyes are opened by faith. We are sent forth, like the disciples, to proclaim the Resurrection.

This is why the Church urges frequent reception. This is why adoration of the Blessed Sacrament draws souls. Protestants who love Scripture deeply would find their love fulfilled and deepened in the full sacramental life Christ intended. The written Word, compiled by the Church, points to the living Word in the Eucharist.

Critics may accuse Catholics of "works" or ritualism, but the Eucharist is pure gift—Christ's self-donation. It requires faith, preparation, and worthy reception, but it is grace upon grace. Emmaus invites all Christians to return to this table.

 Conclusion: Back to the Table

The Road to Emmaus challenges us. In a world of information overload and spiritual hunger, many wander like the disciples, knowledgeable in Scripture yet unrecognized Christ. He walks with us still, in the Church, in the poor, but supremely in the Blessed Sacrament. Let us not ignore the gift. Let us invite Him to stay: "Stay with us, Lord, for it is nearly evening" (Luke 24:29). In the breaking of the bread, He reveals Himself, and our hearts find rest.

The apostles saw Jesus in the bread. So must we. The Eucharist is not an optional add-on or mere symbol. It is Jesus—true Presence for our true nourishment. The Catholic Church preserves this apostolic faith, discerned the Scriptures under the Holy Spirit's guidance, and invites all to the feast. Come to Emmaus. Come to Mass. Recognize Him there.

 

References:

- Holy Bible (various translations, esp. NABRE, RSV).

- Catechism of the Catholic Church.

- Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans.

- Justin Martyr, First Apology.

- Council of Rome (382) Decree on the Canon.

- Works by Brant Pitre, Scott Hahn, and Catholic World Report articles on Emmaus.

Further reading: The Eucharist by Alexander Schmemann; Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist by Brant Pitre.

National Eucharistic Revival A Success Per Survey

Jesus proclaimed in the Gospel of John: "And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself"(John 12:32, NIV). These profound words, spoken in the context of His impending crucifixion, point to the power of His sacrifice on the Cross to attract humanity to salvation. In the mystery of the Eucharist, this promise finds a beautiful and ongoing fulfillment. Because Jesus is truly present—Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity—in the consecrated host, raising the Eucharist in adoration, in the monstrance during processions, or in exaltation during Holy Hours is nothing less than lifting up Christ Himself. Just as He foretold, when the Blessed Sacrament is elevated in glory and reverence, He draws crowds to Himself, stirring hearts, renewing faith, and gathering believers in profound encounters with His Real Presence.

The National Eucharistic Revival, a three-year initiative launched by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in 2022, aimed to renew Catholic belief in the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. This movement responded to earlier concerns about declining understanding and devotion among U.S. Catholics, particularly following a widely discussed 2019 Pew Research Center survey that suggested only about one-third of Catholics fully affirmed the Church's teaching on transubstantiation.

The Revival included nationwide events such as local Holy Hours, Eucharistic processions, catechesis, and the highlight moments: the National Eucharistic Pilgrimage (with four routes spanning thousands of miles in 2024 and 2025) and the 10th National Eucharistic Congress in Indianapolis in July 2024, which drew over 60,000 participants. These efforts sought not only to deepen personal faith but also to inspire missionary outreach, encouraging Catholics to share the gift of the Eucharist with others.

In January 2026, the USCCB released the results of a comprehensive impact study titled "Share Your Perspective" (also available in Spanish as "Comparte tu perspectiva"). Conducted by the Catholic market research firm Vinea Research in collaboration with Revival organizers, this national survey assessed the initiative's effects through two phases: initial one-on-one interviews followed by an online questionnaire distributed in the summer and fall of 2025—one year after the major 2024 events.

The survey reached nearly 2,500 respondents, including lay Catholics (over 2,058, with many drawn from USCCB-provided lists and a general panel of monthly Mass attendees), clergy (249 priests and deacons), and other Church staff. Lay participants were categorized as:

- National participants (50%): Those who attended the National Eucharistic Pilgrimage, Congress, or both.

- Local participants (24%): Those involved in parish-level Revival activities.

- Non-participants (26%): Those with little to no direct involvement.

Respondents were not informed of the survey's Revival-focused purpose to reduce bias, and comparisons were made to post-COVID 2021 baselines.

 Key Findings: Renewed Belief and Devotion to the Eucharist

One of the most encouraging outcomes was a notable rise in belief in the Real Presence. Among surveyed groups, conviction edged to 90% or higher:

- National participants reached 92% (up from 73% in 2021).

- Local participants hit 93% (up from 82%).

- The general segment rose to 90% (up from 78%).

This reflects a strengthened theological understanding and deeper personal encounter with Christ in the Sacrament.

Participation in Eucharistic adoration also surged, with national participants reporting a 17-point increase (60%, up from 43% in 2021), local participants at 64% (up from 49%), and the general group at 43% (up from 37%). Clergy highlighted Holy Hours, adoration events (53%), Eucharistic catechesis (41%), and local processions (39%) as the most fruitful parish-level activities. Those who personally attended national events rated the Pilgrimage and Congress much higher in impact (63-64%).

 Spiritual Fruits: Transformation and Missionary Zeal

The Eucharist, as the "source and summit" of Christian life, bore abundant spiritual fruit through the Revival. Participants reported holistic growth in faith practices:

- Increased frequency of Confession and greater reverence at Mass.

- More engagement in Scripture reading and spiritual practices (e.g., national participants rose to 83% from 66%).

- Significant boosts in community volunteering and outreach—national participants saw a 16-point rise (52%), local 17 points (64%), and general 13 points (40%).

Bishop Andrew Cozzens, chair of the National Eucharistic Congress, emphasized that attendees of the Pilgrimage or Congress were 50% more likely to engage in outreach, share their faith, or perform acts of service. He described this as achieving the core goal: "a missionary conversion of Catholics."

Clergy experienced renewal as well—49% felt more encouraged, with high leadership support (92% of bishops and pastors described as supportive). Many reported refocused pastoral approaches centered on the Eucharist, leading to renewed confidence in preaching about the Real Presence.

Jason Shanks, president of the National Eucharistic Congress, called the impact "deep" and "lasting," stating, "Never in my tenure of working for the Church have I seen such deep impact... The fruits of the National Eucharistic Revival are real, lasting, and will continue to shape the life of the American Church for years to come."

These fruits demonstrate the Eucharist's transformative power: drawing people into deeper union with Christ, fostering personal holiness, strengthening community bonds, and propelling believers outward in evangelization. As one analysis noted, the initiative refocused the Church on the Eucharist, inspiring a grassroots response where the Holy Spirit "stirs up the hearts of his people."

While challenges remain—such as reaching less-engaged Catholics and sustaining momentum at the parish level—the survey confirms the Revival's success in igniting faith. A third Pilgrimage is planned for 2026, signaling ongoing commitment to this Eucharistic renewal.

 Sources

- OSV News: "Survey: National Eucharistic Revival rekindled faith and outreach, but challenges remain" (January 15, 2026) – https://www.osvnews.com/survey-national-eucharistic-revival-rekindled-faith-and-outreach-but-challenges-remain

- Catholic News Agency / EWTN: "Bishops say multimillion-dollar Eucharistic Revival bore spiritual fruit" (January 17, 2026) – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/269145/bishops-say-multimillion-dollar-eucharistic-revival-bore-spiritual-fruit

- Nashville Catholic: "National Eucharistic Revival Survey Results" – https://www.nashvillecatholic.org/news/posts/survey-national-eucharistic-revival-rekindled-faith-and-outreach-challenges-remain

- CatholicVote.org: "USCCB report: The National Eucharistic Revival’s impact, 3 years later" (January 16, 2026) – https://catholicvote.org/usccb-report-the-national-eucharistic-revivals-impact-3-years-later

- Various diocesan and Catholic media outlets (Catholic Review, Detroit Catholic, The Leaven, The Dialog) reporting identical survey details from OSV News wire (January 15-16, 2026)

U.S. bishops say multimillion-dollar Eucharistic revival bore spiritual fruit

Survey: National Eucharistic Revival rekindled faith and outreach, but challenges remain - OSV News

Survey: National Eucharistic Revival rekindled faith and outreach, but challenges remain - Catholic Review

USCCB report: The National Eucharistic Revival’s impact, 3 years later - CatholicVote org

Study: Communion on Tongue = More Belief in True Presence

The Real Presence and Eucharistic Reception: Exploring a Study, Its Implications, and the History of Communion Practices

The Eucharist, described in the Catechism of the Catholic Church as the “source and summit of the Christian life” (CCC 1324), holds a central place in Catholic theology. The doctrine of the Real Presence—that Jesus Christ is truly present, body, blood, soul, and divinity in the consecrated bread and wine—has been a cornerstone of Catholic faith since the earliest days of the Church. Yet, recent studies have raised concerns about declining belief in this doctrine among Catholics, particularly in the United States. 

A 2025 study published in the Catholic Social Science Review by Natalie A. Lindemann, a psychology professor at William Paterson University, has sparked discussion by suggesting that Catholics who receive Communion on the tongue exhibit stronger belief in the Real Presence than those who receive in the hand. This blog post examines the study, critiques its limitations, particularly its failure to account for Catholics who prioritize internal faith over external practices, and provides a historical perspective on the development of Communion on the tongue and in the hand. Ultimately, it argues that faith in the Eucharist is rooted not in the mode of reception but in an informed, intentional spiritual life.

 The Study: Traditional Practices and Belief in the Real Presence

Published on September 23, 2025, in the Catholic Social Science Review, Lindemann’s study investigates how liturgical practices influence U.S. Catholics’ belief in the Real Presence. The research surveyed participants on a five-point scale, where 1 represented the belief that the Eucharist is merely a symbol and 5 indicated certainty in the Real Presence. The study found that Catholics who had ever received Communion on the tongue scored higher (M=3.27) than those who had never done so (M=2.79). The effect was more pronounced among those who always received on the tongue, and strongest among those who believed Communion should be received on the tongue (M=4.32) compared to those favoring reception in the hand (M=2.62) or personal choice (M=3.37). Additionally, traditional liturgical elements, such as ringing consecration bells or exposure to the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM), correlated with stronger belief (M=3.63 for parishes offering TLM vs. M=3.04 for those that did not).

The study suggests that traditional practices—Communion on the tongue, kneeling, consecration bells, and TLM attendance—foster a deeper conviction in the Real Presence. Lindemann argues that these practices emphasize reverence, which may reinforce belief in the Eucharist’s sacred reality. The findings align with concerns raised by earlier surveys, such as the 2019 Pew Research study, which reported that only 31% of U.S. Catholics believe in the Real Presence, prompting the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) to launch a Eucharistic Revival initiative.

The study’s methodology involved a quantitative survey of U.S. Catholics, assessing their liturgical experiences and Eucharistic beliefs. It controlled for variables like age, gender, and ethnicity, finding that liturgical context, not demographics, drove differences in belief. For example, participants whose parishes rang bells at the consecration—a practice highlighting the moment of transubstantiation—reported higher belief scores. Similarly, exposure to the TLM, even if not regularly attended, correlated with stronger faith in the Real Presence.

 Critiquing the Study: Overlooking Internal Faith

While Lindemann’s study offers valuable insights into the correlation between liturgical practices and Eucharistic belief, it has significant limitations, particularly in its failure to account for Catholics who prioritize internal faith over external rituals. The study’s focus on measurable practices risks oversimplifying the complex nature of faith, which is deeply personal and shaped by factors beyond liturgy.

 1. Correlation vs. Causation

The study establishes a correlation between receiving Communion on the tongue and stronger belief in the Real Presence but does not prove causation. It assumes that traditional practices cause stronger belief, but the reverse could be true: Catholics with pre-existing strong belief may gravitate toward traditional practices like receiving on the tongue or attending Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite. The study does not explore whether these individuals already held firm convictions before adopting these practices, nor does it examine whether less traditional Catholics might maintain robust faith through other spiritual practices, such as Eucharistic adoration or personal prayer.

 2. Neglecting Internal Disposition

Faith in the Real Presence is not solely a product of external actions but of an internal disposition cultivated through catechesis, personal reflection, and spiritual growth. The study’s emphasis on physical practices overlooks Catholics who may receive Communion in the hand yet possess a profound belief in the Eucharist due to thorough education or a vibrant prayer life. For example, a Catholic who attends a Novus Ordo Mass, receives in the hand, and participates in regular adoration may have a stronger faith than someone who receives on the tongue but attends Mass irregularly or lacks catechetical grounding. The study’s reliance on a single metric—mode of reception—fails to capture these nuances.

 3. Sampling Bias

The study does not provide detailed information about its sample size or selection process, raising questions about representativeness. If participants were drawn from parishes with strong traditionalist leanings, the results may be skewed toward those already inclined to favor practices like Communion on the tongue. Catholics who prioritize faith through intellectual engagement, such as studying Church teachings or participating in theological discussions, may be underrepresented. The study’s focus on liturgical context may also marginalize Catholics who express their faith through service, community involvement, or other non-liturgical means.

 4. Cultural and Historical Context

The study notes that the COVID-19 pandemic influenced some participants to receive Communion in the hand due to hygiene concerns, yet it does not explore how such external factors might affect belief. For instance, Catholics who switched to receiving in the hand during the pandemic may still maintain strong faith, but the study’s framework might misinterpret their practice as indicative of weaker belief. Similarly, cultural differences within the U.S. Catholic population—such as varying traditions among Hispanic, African American, or Asian communities—are not adequately addressed, potentially oversimplifying the relationship between practice and belief.

 5. Overemphasis on Uniformity

The study suggests that “uniformity of ritual” strengthens belief, but this overlooks the diversity of Catholic spirituality. The Church has long embraced varied expressions of faith, from the contemplative mysticism of St. John of the Cross to the active charity of St. Vincent de Paul. By prioritizing traditional practices, the study risks implying that less traditional Catholics are less faithful, which may alienate those who find spiritual depth in other aspects of the faith, such as Scripture study or social justice work.

In summary, while the study highlights an interesting correlation, it fails to account for the complexity of faith, particularly among Catholics who focus on internal belief and spiritual growth rather than specific liturgical practices. Faith in the Real Presence is not a one-size-fits-all outcome of ritual but a dynamic relationship with Christ, shaped by education, prayer, and personal commitment.

 A Brief History of Communion on the Tongue and in the Hand

To understand the debate surrounding Communion on the tongue versus in the hand, a historical perspective is essential. Contrary to common assumptions, receiving Communion in the hand is the more ancient practice, rooted in the early Church, while Communion on the tongue emerged later as a response to theological and practical concerns.

 Early Church: Communion in the Hand

In the first centuries of Christianity, receiving Communion in the hand was the norm. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, in his 4th-century Mystagogic Catechesis, instructed the faithful to receive the Eucharist in the hand with reverence: “Coming up to receive, therefore, do not approach with your wrists extended or your fingers splayed, but making your left hand a throne for the right… receive the body of Christ, and answer, ‘Amen.’” This practice was highly ritualized, with communicants washing their hands, bowing deeply, and consuming the Host directly from the palm to avoid dropping particles. Early Church Fathers, such as St. Augustine and St. John Chrysostom, also describe Communion in the hand, emphasizing the need for reverence to reflect belief in the Real Presence.

The early Church’s practice was not casual; it was accompanied by strict protocols to ensure respect for the Eucharist. However, as the Church grew and Eucharistic theology developed, concerns about potential abuses—such as dropping fragments or irreverent handling—began to emerge.

 Shift to Communion on the Tongue

By the 6th and 7th centuries, the practice of receiving Communion on the tongue started to gain traction, particularly in the Western Church. Several factors drove this shift:

1. Theological Development: As the doctrine of the Real Presence became more explicitly defined, particularly in response to early heresies questioning Christ’s presence in the Eucharist, the Church sought to emphasize reverence. Receiving on the tongue, often while kneeling, was seen as a way to express humility and adoration.

2. Practical Concerns: The risk of Eucharistic particles being lost or mishandled led to stricter controls. Documents from the Synod of Rouen (650) and the Sixth Ecumenical Council at Constantinople (680-681) condemned Communion in the hand to prevent abuses, with the latter threatening excommunication for those who continued the practice.

3. Clerical Authority: The growing distinction between clergy and laity in the medieval Church reinforced the practice of Communion on the tongue. Priests, whose hands were consecrated, were seen as the appropriate ministers to handle the Eucharist, reducing the laity’s direct contact with the Host.

By the 9th century, Communion on the tongue had become the universal norm in the Latin Rite, often received while kneeling at altar rails. This practice remained dominant for over a millennium, reinforced by the Council of Trent (1545-1563), which reaffirmed the Real Presence and emphasized reverence in Eucharistic practices.

 Revival of Communion in the Hand

The 20th century saw a renewed interest in early Church practices, spurred by the liturgical movement and the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). In 1969, the Holy See issued Memoriale Domini, which acknowledged that Communion in the hand was the ancient practice but noted that Communion on the tongue had become the norm due to concerns about reverence and particle loss. The document permitted bishops’ conferences to request an indult (permission) to allow Communion in the hand, provided it was done with proper catechesis and reverence. The United States received this indult in 1977, and today, the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) states that communicants may receive “either on the tongue or, where this is allowed and if the communicant so chooses, in the hand” (No. 161).

The revival of Communion in the hand was not a rejection of reverence but an attempt to reconnect with the early Church’s traditions while ensuring proper instruction. However, critics argue that inadequate catechesis and casual practices in some parishes have undermined reverence, contributing to declining belief in the Real Presence.

 Modern Context

Today, Catholics may choose to receive Communion either on the tongue or in the hand, as both are sanctioned by the Church. The USCCB emphasizes that the decision belongs to the individual, provided it is done reverently. Debates persist, with some, like Cardinal Robert Sarah, arguing that Communion in the hand reflects a “lack of submission to the signs of God,” while others, such as Fr. Josh Johnson, stress that both methods are valid when approached with faith.

This historical overview reveals that Communion in the hand is not a modern innovation but a return to an ancient practice, while Communion on the tongue is a later development rooted in medieval concerns for reverence. Neither practice inherently determines faith, but both require an interior disposition of reverence and belief.

See more: Sacerdotus: Holy Communion: Hand vs Tongue Discussion

 Faith in the Eucharist: Beyond the Mode of Reception

While Lindemann’s study suggests that traditional practices like Communion on the tongue strengthen belief in the Real Presence, the true source of faith lies not in the external act but in an informed, intentional spiritual life. The Church teaches that faith is a gift of grace, nurtured through catechesis, prayer, and active participation in the sacramental life. Several key factors contribute to a robust belief in the Eucharist:

 1. Catechesis and Education

A deep understanding of the Eucharist is foundational to faith in the Real Presence. The Church’s teachings, as articulated in the Catechism (CCC 1374-1375) and Scripture (John 6:27-58), emphasize that the Eucharist is not a symbol but the true presence of Christ. Catholics who engage with these teachings—through homilies, Bible studies, or theological reading—are more likely to develop a conviction that transcends liturgical practices. For example, a Catholic who receives in the hand but has studied the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas on transubstantiation may have a stronger faith than someone who receives on the tongue but lacks such knowledge.

 2. Spiritual Practices

Faith in the Eucharist is deepened through practices like Eucharistic adoration, where Catholics encounter Christ’s presence in a contemplative setting. Adoration, which has seen a resurgence in recent years, fosters a personal relationship with Christ that reinforces belief, regardless of how one receives Communion. Other practices, such as frequent confession, prayer, and meditation on the Passion, also cultivate a Eucharistic spirituality.

 3. Interior Disposition

The Church emphasizes that reverence for the Eucharist begins with the heart. Whether receiving on the tongue or in the hand, the communicant’s interior disposition—marked by humility, faith, and a state of grace—is paramount. St. Paul’s admonition in 1 Corinthians 11:27-29 warns against receiving the Eucharist unworthily, highlighting the importance of spiritual preparation over physical posture.

 4. Community and Witness

Faith is also shaped by the witness of others. Catholics who belong to vibrant parishes, participate in faith-sharing groups, or see examples of Eucharistic devotion in their families are more likely to internalize belief in the Real Presence. This communal aspect transcends the mode of reception and emphasizes the role of the Church as a living body.

 5. Response to Modern Challenges

The decline in belief noted in studies like Pew’s 2019 survey reflects broader challenges, including secularization, poor catechesis, and cultural shifts. The USCCB’s Eucharistic Revival seeks to address these by promoting education, adoration, and renewed liturgical focus. While traditional practices may help, they are not a panacea; faith requires a holistic approach that engages both heart and mind.

In contrast to the study’s focus on external practices, these factors highlight that faith in the Real Presence is a dynamic process, rooted in an informed, intentional relationship with Christ. A Catholic who receives in the hand but actively pursues spiritual growth may exhibit greater faith than one who receives on the tongue out of habit or cultural preference.

 Conclusion

Lindemann’s study offers a thought-provoking perspective on the correlation between traditional liturgical practices and belief in the Real Presence. However, its limitations—particularly its failure to account for Catholics who prioritize internal faith over external rituals—underscore the complexity of Eucharistic belief. The history of Communion practices reveals that receiving in the hand is an ancient tradition, while Communion on the tongue emerged later to emphasize reverence. Neither method inherently determines faith; instead, belief in the Real Presence is cultivated through catechesis, spiritual practices, and an interior disposition of reverence.

As the Church navigates declining belief in the Eucharist, the focus should not be on mandating one form of reception but on fostering a deeper understanding of the sacrament. Catholics who are informed about Church teachings, engage in prayer and adoration, and approach the Eucharist with humility—whether receiving on the tongue or in the hand—are the ones who truly embody faith in the Real Presence. The Eucharistic Revival offers an opportunity to renew this faith, not by privileging one practice over another but by inviting all Catholics to encounter Christ in the Eucharist with open hearts.

---

 References and News

1. Lindemann, N. A. (2025). “Traditional Liturgical Experiences Predict Stronger Belief in the Real Presence.” Catholic Social Science Review, Volume 30. [Study Link]

2. ZENIT News. (2025, September 23). “Study Links Traditional Eucharistic Practices to Stronger Belief in Christ’s Presence.” ZENIT - English.[](https://zenit.org/2025/09/23/study-links-traditional-eucharistic-practices-to-stronger-belief-in-christs-presence)

3. Catholic News Agency. (2025, September 22). “New study: ‘Traditional liturgical experiences predict stronger belief in the Real Presence’.” catholicnewsagency.com.[](https://catholicnewsagency.com/news/266685/new-study-traditional-liturgical-experiences-predict-stronger-belief-in-the-real-presence)

4. Catholicism.org. (2025, September 18). “Traditional Liturgical Practices Predict Belief in the Real Presence.” catholicism.org.[](https://catholicism.org/traditional-liturgical-practices-predict-belief-in-the-real-presence.html)

5. Catholic News Agency. (2023, September 29). “New study shows that now almost two-thirds of US Catholics believe in Real Presence.” catholicnewsagency.com.[](https://catholicnewsagency.com/news/255526/new-study-show-that-now-almost-two-thirds-of-us-catholics-believe-in-real-presence)

6. Catholicus.eu. (2025, April 12). “Devotion or Disrespect? The Truth About Receiving Communion in the Hand According to Catholic Tradition.” catholicus.eu.[](https://catholicus.eu/en/devotion-or-disrespect-the-truth-about-receiving-communion-in-the-hand-according-to-catholic-tradition)

7. America Magazine. (2018, February 23). “Cardinal Sarah: Receiving Communion in the hand part of a ‘diabolical attack’ on the faith.” www.americamagazine.org.[](https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/02/23/cardinal-sarah-receiving-communion-hand-part-diabolical-attack-faith)

8. Ascension Press. (2024, December 16). “Should We Receive Holy Communion on the Tongue or in the Hand?” ascensionpress.com.[](https://ascensionpress.com/blogs/podcasts/should-we-receive-holy-communion-on-the-tongue-or-in-the-hand)

9. America Magazine. (2023, November 17). “Hands or tongue, kneeling or standing: There’s no ‘best way’ to receive Communion.” www.americamagazine.org.[](https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2023/11/17/communion-eucharist-hands-tongue-kneeling-246518/)

10. Corpus Christi for Unity and Peace. (2024, October 16). “Massive Survey Shows Receiving Communion in Hand IS THE CAUSE for LOSS OF FAITH.” www.corpuschristiforunityandpeace.org.[](https://www.corpuschristiforunityandpeace.org/massive-survey-shows-receiving-communion-in-hand-is-the-cause-for-loss-of-faith/)

11. Ron Conte. (2020, July 29). “Proof that Communion on the Tongue does not Preserve Orthodoxy.” ronconte.com.[](https://ronconte.com/2020/07/29/proof-that-communion-on-the-tongue-does-not-preserve-orthodoxy/)

12. Mater Dei Catholic Parish. (2014, November 16). “Receiving Communion on the tongue at the altar rail.” materdeiparish.com.[](https://materdeiparish.com/new-to-latin-mass/receiving-communion-tongue-altar-rail/)

13. California Catholic Daily. (2020, March 6). “Communion on tongue is more hygienic, say priests and bishop.” cal-catholic.com.[](https://cal-catholic.com/44217-2/)

14. Catholic365.com. (2019, August 26). “Why don’t Catholics Believe in the Real Presence?” catholic365.com.[](https://catholic365.com/article/10540/why-dont-catholics-believe-in-the-real-presence.html)

15. Liturgy Guy. (2015, April 11). “The Affirmative Argument for Receiving Communion on the Tongue.” liturgyguy.com.[](https://liturgyguy.com/2015/04/11/the-affirmative-argument-for-receiving-communion-on-the-tongue/)

16. The Boston Pilot. (2021, December 1). “Communion in hand or tongue?” www.thebostonpilot.com.[](https://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.php?ID=191192)

17. Reasonable Catholic. (2016, January 4). “Communion In The Hand?” www.reasonablecatholic.com.[](https://www.reasonablecatholic.com/communion-in-the-hand/)

18. Catholic365.com. (2022, July 17). “Communion on the Tongue is an Apostolic Tradition, and Should Be the Only Way to Receive the Eucharist.” www.catholic365.com.[](https://www.catholic365.com/article/19342/communion-on-the-tongue-is-an-apostolic-tradition-and-should-be-the-only-way-to-receive-the-eucharist.html)

19. Know Your Catholic Faith. (2017, November 16). “COMMUNION BY THE HAND OR BY THE TONGUE?” knowyourcatholicfaith.wordpress.com.[](https://knowyourcatholicfaith.wordpress.com/2017/11/17/%25E2%2580%258Bcommunion-by-the-hand-or-by-the-tongue/)

20. The Catholic Messenger. (2023, November 30). “Question on Communion on the tongue or hand.” catholicmessenger.net.[](https://catholicmessenger.net/2023/11/question-on-communion-on-the-tongue-or-hand/)

21. Catholic Times. (2024, February 6). “Receiving Holy Communion on the tongue.” catholictimescolumbus.org.[](https://catholictimescolumbus.org/news/father-paul-keller-op-s-t-d/receiving-holy-communion-on-the-tongue)

22. FSSP Joliet. (2020, June 27). “Holy Communion on the tongue or in the hand? (Revised June 27, 2020).” fsspjoliet.wordpress.com.[](https://fsspjoliet.wordpress.com/2020/06/27/holy-communion-on-the-tongue-or-in-the-hand/)

23. Integrated Catholic Life. (2011, October 21). “How to Receive Holy Communion on the Tongue.” integratedcatholiclife.org.[](https://integratedcatholiclife.org/2011/10/deacon-bickerstaff-how-to-receive-holy-communion-on-the-tongue/)

24. Bismarck Diocese. (2018, November 4). “Is it best to receive Holy Communion in the hand or on the tongue?” bismarckdiocese.com.[](https://bismarckdiocese.com/news/is-it-best-to-receive-holy-communion-in-the-hand-or-on-the-tongue)

25. Catholic Herald. (2020, May 28). “Prohibiting Communion on the Tongue: A Canonical View.” catholicherald.org.[](https://catholicherald.org/catholic-herald/prohibiting-communion-on-the-tongue-a-canonical-view/)

26. Catholic Arena. (2023, August 15). “Receiving the Holy Eucharist: tongue, or hand?” www.catholicarena.com.[](https://www.catholicarena.com/latest/2023/8/11/receiving-the-holy-eucharist-on-the-tongue-or-in-the-hand)