US Bishops Issue Declension Against Immigration Raids

The Bishops' Cry: A Prophetic Voice Against Inhumane Deportations

In the shadow of a nation once hailed as a beacon of hope for the weary and the oppressed, a storm brews—not of weather, but of human suffering. On November 13, 2025, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) released a poignant video that has pierced the veil of political indifference, condemning the Trump-Vance administration's aggressive deportation raids as "inhumane." This is no mere press release or fleeting tweet; it is a clarion call from shepherds of the faith, speaking not from ivory towers but from the trenches of pastoral care, where families are torn asunder and dignity is trampled under the boot of expediency. As the video's views climb past five million, it resonates far beyond Catholic circles, echoing the Gospel's unyielding demand for justice amid a policy that treats human beings like refuse.

The video, a somber montage of bishops addressing the camera directly, opens with a stark montage of raids: masked agents storming workplaces, children wailing as parents are handcuffed, and detention centers overflowing with the vulnerable. Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, his voice steady yet laced with sorrow, intones, "We stand with the migrants, not against the law, but against the cruelty that has hijacked it." Bishop Robert Barron, ever the articulate defender of faith, follows: "The indiscriminate nature of these operations—sweeping up the undocumented alongside the documented, the criminal with the innocent—violates the sacred dignity bestowed by God on every person." The clip builds to a crescendo with Archbishop José Gomez of Los Angeles declaring, "This is not enforcement; this is exile without mercy. We oppose the mass deportation of people who have built lives here, contributed to our communities, and sought only refuge from despair."

At its core, the video embodies the bishops' "Special Message" approved overwhelmingly—216 to 5, with three abstentions—at their Baltimore assembly. This rare invocation, unused since 2013, reads like a lamentation from the prophets: "We oppose the indiscriminate mass deportation of people. We pray for an end to dehumanizing rhetoric and violence, whether directed at immigrants or at law enforcement. We pray that the Lord may guide the leaders of our nation." The bishops decry the raids' toll: families separated at gunpoint, churches raided during Mass, schools emptied by fear, and hospitals treating the wounded from clashes. They invoke the "God-given human dignity" of all, urging "all people of good will" to accompany immigrants in their plight. It's a moral indictment, not a partisan jab, framing the policy as a betrayal of America's founding ethos and Christianity's foundational ethic.

This condemnation did not emerge in a vacuum. It follows Pope Leo XIV's own fiery words just weeks prior, where he labeled the raids "inhuman," a treatment of migrants as "garbage" that constitutes a "serious sin." The first American pope, Leo XIV—elected in a conclave that stunned the world with its transatlantic pivot—has made immigration his signature crusade, urging U.S. bishops to speak "with one voice" against such brutality. In the video, the bishops credit this papal nudge, positioning their stand as fidelity to Rome's unyielding defense of the vulnerable. Yet, for all its gravity, the message is laced with hope: calls for "meaningful reform of our nation’s immigration laws," dialogue with officials, and a vision where borders secure without savaging souls.

 The Catholic Church's Timeless Teaching on Borders and the Stranger

To grasp the bishops' outrage, one must delve into the Catholic Church's rich tapestry of teachings on immigration—a doctrine woven from Scripture, tradition, and the lived witness of saints and sages. Far from a modern invention, this ethic roots in the Hebrew Scriptures, where Yahweh commands Israel: "The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt" (Leviticus 19:34). This mandate echoes through the New Testament, where Jesus identifies with the outcast: "I was a stranger and you welcomed me" (Matthew 25:35). The early Church Fathers amplified this, with St. John Chrysostom thundering in the fourth century, "Do you not see how the Lord received the Canaanite woman, a foreigner, with compassion? So must we embrace the sojourner, lest we reject Christ Himself."

The Church has never been naive about borders. Popes across centuries affirm the right of nations to regulate entry for the common good. Pope Pius XII, in his 1952 apostolic exhortation Exsul Familia, balanced hospitality with order: "The sovereign power of the State... has the right to control the movement of foreigners within its borders." Yet, he insisted this authority must bow to natural law, ensuring migrants are not "treated as enemies" but as brothers. St. Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor, echoed this in his Summa Theologica, arguing that while property and sovereignty demand just limits, charity compels aid to the needy, even across lines drawn by man.

Enter the modern era, where popes have confronted the global migration crisis with pastoral fire. Pope Leo XIII, in Rerum Novarum (1891), laid the groundwork by decrying the exploitation of the poor, many of whom fled famine and oppression—foreshadowing today's caravans. He wrote, "The concentration of so many men in the cities... drives the laborer to seek refuge in foreign lands," urging nations to welcome without prejudice. Pius XI extended this in Quadragesimo Anno (1931), condemning xenophobia as a "poison" that erodes Christian solidarity.

Pope John XXIII, in Pacem in Terris (1963), declared migration a natural right: "Every man has the right to live... and the right to emigrate if his homeland cannot sustain him." John Paul II, the pilgrim pope, personalized this in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987), recounting his own Polish roots amid Soviet oppression: "The Church... is called to respond to the cry of the stranger at the door." Benedict XVI, in Caritas in Veritate (2009), warned against "globalization without solidarity," insisting borders must facilitate, not fortify against, human flourishing.

No voice rings louder than Pope Francis, whose papacy has been a megaphone for the marginalized. In Evangelii Gaudium (2013), he lambasted "anesthetized consciences" that ignore migrants' plight, calling for "a globalization of solidarity." His 2019 visit to the U.S.-Mexico border, where he placed a crucifix atop barbed wire, symbolized this tension: respect for law, rejection of lethality. Francis's encyclical Fratelli Tutti (2020) devotes chapters to migration, quoting St. Oscar Romero: "Let us not forget that the poor and the excluded are not statistics but human beings." He critiques "throwaway cultures" that discard the undocumented like refuse, urging "safe, orderly, and regular" paths while decrying walls as "symbols of fear."

Pope Leo XIV builds on this legacy, infusing it with American urgency. In his first address to U.S. bishops, he invoked St. Oscar Romero's martyrdom for the Salvadoran refugees, declaring, "The blood of the martyrs cries out from the Rio Grande: welcome the stranger, or weep for your silence." Leo XIV's words in the deportation context—"treating migrants as garbage is a grave sin"—channel Francis's fury while grounding it in Aquinas's just limits. Together, these pontiffs form a chorus: borders are not prisons, but portals for providence.

Saints embody this teaching in flesh and blood. St. Frances Xavier Cabrini, patroness of immigrants, crossed the Atlantic 30 times in the 19th century to aid Italian newcomers in America's teeming slums, founding orphanages amid nativist riots. "I came to America to work for the millions of immigrants who suffer," she said, embodying Leo XIII's vision. St. John Bosco sheltered street urchins and migrant youth in Turin, teaching that "charity knows no passport." In our time, Blessed Oscar Romero confronted El Salvador's death squads for Central American refugees, assassinated mid-Mass with the words, "In the name of God... stop the repression!" Their lives refute any charge of "open borders" idealism; Cabrini navigated legal hurdles, Bosco built self-sufficient communities, Romero advocated reform over anarchy.

Church Fathers like St. Augustine, in City of God, distinguished the earthly city’s laws from the heavenly: nations guard peace, but never at mercy's expense. St. Basil the Great established xenodocheia—guest houses for strangers—in fourth-century Cappadocia, insisting, "The bread you hold back belongs to the hungry; the coat in your closet to the naked." This patristic wisdom informs the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 2241): "The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner, seeking always to relieve the needs of those suffering from want." Yet, it adds, "Political authorities... have the right to impose reasonable limits." Humane borders, not iron curtains.

Scripture seals this edifice. Beyond Leviticus and Matthew, Deuteronomy 10:19 commands, "You shall love the sojourner, for you were sojourners in Egypt." Hebrews 13:2 urges, "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares." Jesus' parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) shatters ethnic barriers: the hero is the foreigner aiding the native. In Acts 10, Peter's vision abolishes clean/unclean divides, prefiguring the Church's universal embrace. Paul, in Romans 13, honors authority but subordinates it to love (13:8-10), while Galatians 3:28 proclaims, "There is neither Jew nor Greek... for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

Thus, the Church's stance is crystalline: borders are legitimate, but their enforcement must mirror Christ's mercy. Illegal entry is a civil wrong, not a mortal sin; the greater evil lies in systemic cruelty. As the bishops' video asserts, "We do not advocate lawlessness, but a law reformed by love."

 Nuancing the Call: Humane Treatment, Not Open Borders

Lest misinterpretation fester, the bishops' condemnation is no endorsement of chaos. The video explicitly states: "We support secure borders and just immigration laws, but these raids—raiding churches, separating families without due process—cross into inhumanity." This echoes the USCCB's long-standing framework, Strangers No Longer (2003, with Mexico's bishops), which affirms nations' sovereignty while decrying "indiscriminate enforcement" that punishes the vulnerable. The Church distinguishes: immigration status is a legal category; human dignity, eternal.

Pope Francis clarifies this in Fratelli Tutti: "We need to move beyond the idea of simply closing borders... toward a regulated circulation of people." Leo XIV, in his raid critique, added, "Enforce the law with justice, not vengeance; deport criminals, yes—but give the asylum-seeker a hearing, the worker a chance." Saints like Cabrini lobbied Congress for legal protections, not abolition of them. The Catechism (CCC 1911) binds the common good to subsidiarity: aid the migrant locally, regulate globally.

In practice, Catholic Charities aids legal immigrants and undocumented alike—shelters for DACA recipients, legal clinics for visa holders—without promoting illegality. The bishops' plea is for proportionality: prioritize threats, not blanket sweeps. As Barron notes in the video, "Humane treatment applies whether one arrived by plane or perilously by foot." This is Gospel pragmatism: welcome the stranger, respect the state, reform the system.

 The Tempest of Backlash: Obeying Caesar Over God?

Yet, prophecy provokes. The video's release unleashed a torrent of ire from Protestant quarters and right-wing Catholics, a fury that exposes a rift in the soul of American Christianity. Evangelical leaders like Franklin Graham decried it as "papal meddling in sovereignty," while Franklin's son, Will, tweeted, "Bishops should preach salvation, not amnesty—Romans 13 demands submission to rulers!" On X, Protestant influencers amplified this, one viral post snarling, "The Vatican forgets: God ordained governments to punish evildoers, not coddle criminals crossing borders illegally."

Even among Catholics, the backlash stings. Conservative outlets like Townhall mocked, "Bishops applauding anti-Trump theater while kids are trafficked under Biden—priorities?" X erupted with BishopsBetrayed, users like @CatholicPatriot raging, "These prelates sold out for migrants over unborn babies. Obey Caesar? No—obey God by securing the border!" Tom Homan, Trump's Catholic border czar, fired back: "As a Catholic, I say fix your own house before lecturing on raids." JD Vance, the vice president and self-professed Catholic, earlier jabbed, "USCCB's $100M in fed funds for resettling illegals—humanitarian or hypocritical?"

This anger seethes with a selective Scripture: Romans 13:1-7, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities," twisted into blanket fealty. But the Bible's chorus is more nuanced. Acts 5:29 trumps it: "We must obey God rather than men." When Pharaoh enslaved Hebrews, Moses defied; Daniel prayed against the king's edict; Peter healed on the Sabbath, scorning Sabbath laws. Jesus Himself upended temple tables (Matthew 21:12), calling Herod a "fox" (Luke 13:32). Protestants, heirs to Luther's "Here I stand," ironically echo the Pharisees' legalism, preferring Caesar's sword to Christ's cross.

For right-wing Catholics echoing this, the critique cuts deeper: you are more Protestant than Catholic, unmoored from Magisterial moorings. The Church's social doctrine—enshrined in Gaudium et Spes (1965)—demands prophetic witness against unjust laws. These critics, cherry-picking Aquinas on authority while ignoring his charity imperatives, reveal a catechetical chasm. They don't know—or willfully forget—the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (2004), which states, "The Magisterium... denounces structures of sin" like exploitative migration policies. Their morals? Subordinated to MAGA altars, where "America First" supplants "God First." Politics trumps faith when rallies elicit cheers but refugees rouse sneers. As St. John Paul II warned, "Do not conform to this world" (Romans 12:2)—yet they do, trading the seamstress's mantle for Fox News fearmongering.

This isn't mere disagreement; it's dissent from the deposit of faith. Such Catholics, invoking "render unto Caesar" sans context, embody the "cafeteria Catholicism" they decry in liberals. Their anger blinds them to the bishops' nuance, painting mercy as malice. In truth, it's they who obey Caesar over God, fortifying walls where Christ bids welcome.

 Free Speech, Moral Mandate: Bishops in the Public Square

To those X posts bleating, "Stay out of politics, Fathers—stick to sacraments!" the response is threefold: citizenship, Constitution, and conscience. American bishops are U.S. citizens, vested with First Amendment rights to free speech and petition. As Archbishop Coakley, the new USCCB president, affirmed, "We vote, pay taxes, and bury our dead from wars—we engage as patriots." This isn't clerical overreach; it's civic duty.

Moreover, the Church's mission transcends pews. Vatican II's Gaudium et Spes mandates: "The Church... has the duty to speak out on social issues." Prophets like Amos thundered against injustice; Jesus scourged Pharisees in synagogues. Silence on raids—while parishes empty from fear—is complicity. Proverbs 31:8 commands, "Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves." The undocumented, voiceless in detention, cry for such advocacy. As citizens, bishops fulfill this; as pastors, they cannot shirk it.

Critics invoking "separation of church and state" invert it: the clause bars government meddling in faith, not faithful meddling in governance. From Wilberforce's abolitionism to King's civil rights crusade—both Christian—the public square thrives on moral voices. The bishops' video is that: not partisanship, but prophecy.

 Abortion's Shadow: No False Equivalence

Another barb: "Bishops blitz immigration but whisper on abortion—hypocrites!" X threads tally "zero videos on baby-killing," contrasting the raid clip. Yet, this is calumny born of amnesia. The Catholic Church birthed the modern pro-life movement. In 1967, before Roe v. Wade, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) formed a Family Life Bureau to combat contraception and abortion. Post-Roe (1973), they sued the government, funded crisis pregnancies, and rallied millions via the Respect Life program—annually since 1972.

Decades of fight: annual marches drawing bishops like Cordileone and Aquila; Evangelium Vitae (1995) by John Paul II, a pro-life Magna Carta; Francis's Amoris Laetitia (2016) integrating mercy with unyielding opposition. The USCCB's 2024 budget: $10M+ for pro-life, dwarfing immigration ops. Videos? Hundreds—YouTube's USCCB channel brims with anti-abortion pleas, from Dolan’s "No Exceptions" series to Barron’s "Why I'm Pro-Life."

No comparison: abortion slays the innocent pre-birth; raids exile the living. Both demand outcry, but the Church's pro-life primacy is etched in blood—saints like Gianna Molla, who died saving her child. The bishops address both; critics spotlight one to silence the other.

 Funding Fables: Motives Unmasked

Then, the conspiracy: "Bishops bark for bucks—$100M in fed grants for migrant aid!" Vance's January quip lingers, amplified on X: "Humanitarian? Or grift?" True, Catholic Charities receives federal funds—$1.8B in 2023 for refugees, per audits. But this beggars logic as motive. Trump, master of retribution, froze USAID grants to NGOs critiquing his first-term policies; his DOJ probed "disloyal" clerics. Issuing this video invites audits, cuts, lawsuits—hardly a funding ploy.

No: the bishops' wealth is in witness, not wallets. They condemned Reagan's El Salvador aid (1980s), Bush's Iraq war (2003), and Obama's deportations (2014)—across aisles. Leo XIV's raid blast risked Vatican-Trump ties, post-Vance's May audience. As Dolan says, "We speak because Christ compels, not contracts compel." Funding claims crumble under scrutiny; courage stands.

 What Would Jesus Do? Mercy Meets the Magistrate

Finally, the incarnate lens: What would Jesus do amid these raids? He’d stride into the detention center, as in Capernaum (Mark 2:1-12), healing the paralyzed—undocumented or not—declaring, "Your sins are forgiven; rise and walk." To the agents, He'd echo the adulteress's accusers (John 8:1-11): "Let the sinless cast first." Yet, to the crowd, He'd remind: "Render unto Caesar" (Mark 12:17)—respect laws, but transcend them with love.

Jesus welcomed Samaritans (John 4), lepers (Luke 17), tax collectors—outcasts all—regardless of status. His Nativity? A refugee family fleeing Herod's sword (Matthew 2:13-15). But He honored Passover laws, paid temple tax—order with obedience. The Church channels this: aid the alien, amend the unjust. As Leo XIV urges, "Be like the Father, who makes sun rise on good and evil" (Matthew 5:45).

 A Call to Conscience: Reclaim the Radical Love

As 2025 wanes, the bishops' video lingers—a mirror to our souls. Will we heed the stranger's plea, or harden Pharaoh hearts? The Church, from Fathers to Francis to Leo, bids us choose: borders of bronze, or bridges of beatitude? In welcoming the least, we enthrone the King. Let this be our Lent: repent the raids' rage, reform with righteousness. For in the end, nations fall, but mercy endures.

You can read more on this topic from our other articles here:

1. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/11/st-frances-xavier-cabrini-beacon-of.html
2. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/11/protestants-twisting-scripture-against.html
3. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/09/ice-agent-shoves-ecuadorian-mother.html
4. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/02/usccb-sues-trump-administration-over.html
5. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/01/cardinal-dolan-vs-vp-vance.html
6. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/01/mass-deportation-outcry.html
7. https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/01/the-catholic-churchs-teachings-on.html

 References

1. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2025, November 13). Special Message on Immigration. USCCB.org. [web:0, web:6, web:10]

2. Hale, C. (2025, November 13). “The Church Stands With Migrants” — Bishops’ Video Denouncing Trump-Vance ICE Raids Goes Global. The Letters from Leo. 

3. The New York Times. (2025, November 12). Catholic Bishops Rebuke U.S. ‘Mass Deportation’ of Immigrants. 

4. The Washington Post. (2025, November 13). Catholic bishops condemn ‘indiscriminate mass deportation’ in rare statement. 

5. The Independent. (2025, November 13). Catholic Bishops slam the White House’s aggressive deportation push. [web:6, web:11]

6. Townhall. (2025, November 14). Tom Homan Takes Catholic Bishops to the Cleaners Over Video Condemning Deportations. 

7. Mediaite. (2025, November 14). Trump Border Czar Scolds Catholic Bishops’ Public Protest of ICE’s Mass Deportation Tactics. 

8. Not the Bee. (2025, November 14). Catholic bishops go to war with Trump over deportation raids. 

9. The Daily Beast. (2025, November 13). Catholic Bishops Take Rare Step to Slam Donald Trump’s Deportations. 

10. Los Angeles Times. (2025, November 13). U.S. Catholic bishops oppose Trump's 'indiscriminate' deportations. 

11. Pope Leo XIII. (1891). Rerum Novarum. Vatican.va.

12. Pope Pius XII. (1952). Exsul Familia. Vatican.va.

13. Pope John XXIII. (1963). Pacem in Terris. Vatican.va.

14. Pope John Paul II. (1987). Sollicitudo Rei Socialis. Vatican.va; (1995). Evangelium Vitae. Vatican.va.

15. Pope Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in Veritate. Vatican.va.

16. Pope Francis. (2013). Evangelii Gaudium. Vatican.va; (2016). Amoris Laetitia. Vatican.va; (2020). Fratelli Tutti. Vatican.va.

17. Pope Leo XIV. (2025). Address to U.S. Bishops on Immigration. Vatican Press Office.

18. St. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica (II-II, Q. 66, Art. 7). New Advent.

19. Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992). §§ 2241, 1911. USCCB.

20. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops & Conferencia Episcopal Mexicana. (2003). Strangers No Longer. USCCB.

21. Second Vatican Council. (1965). Gaudium et Spes. Vatican.va.

22. Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2004). Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Vatican.va.

23. Holy Bible (RSV-CE): Leviticus 19:34; Deuteronomy 10:19; Matthew 25:35; Luke 10:25-37; Acts 5:29; Romans 13:1-10; Hebrews 13:2.

24. St. John Chrysostom. Homilies on Matthew (Homily 50). New Advent.

25. St. Augustine. City of God (Book XIX). New Advent.

26. St. Basil the Great. On Social Justice. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press.

27. St. Frances Xavier Cabrini. Letters and Writings. (Selections in Mother Cabrini: Italian Immigrant of the Century. 1998).

28. St. John Bosco. The Biographical Memoirs. Don Bosco Publications.

29. Blessed Oscar Romero. The Violence of Love. Orbis Books (1988).

30. Various X Posts: @chrisjollyhale (post:26, 2025-11-13); @DefiantLs (post:22, 2025-11-14); @DanaLoeschRadio (post:19, 2025-11-14); @mail_american (post:18, 2025-11-14). [post:15-41]

ICE Agent Shoves Ecuadorian Mother

The Incident at 26 Federal Plaza: A Case of Excessive Force and Immigration Enforcement

On September 25, 2025, a distressing incident unfolded at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, New York City, a federal building that houses immigration courts, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office, and other federal agencies, including those handling Social Security hearings. The event involved an ICE officer who was caught on video shoving an Ecuadorian mother, Monica Moreta-Galarza, against a wall and onto the ground in front of her two young children and a crowd of onlookers. The altercation, which quickly went viral on social media, sparked widespread outrage, led to the officer being relieved of his duties, and prompted calls for criminal prosecution. This post examines the details of the incident, the individuals involved, the aftermath, and the broader context of immigration enforcement at 26 Federal Plaza, while also offering an opinion on the legal and ethical implications of the event.

 What Happened: A Detailed Account

The incident occurred in the crowded hallways of 26 Federal Plaza, a focal point of the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration crackdown. Monica Moreta-Galarza, an Ecuadorian asylum seeker who arrived in the United States with her family in 2024, was at the federal building with her husband and two children—a daughter and a son—for an asylum hearing. The family had fled violence in Ecuador, seeking safety and legal status in the U.S. However, during the hearing, ICE agents detained Moreta-Galarza’s husband, separating him from his family in a chaotic scene.

Videos circulating on social media captured the heart-wrenching moments leading up to the altercation. In one clip, Moreta-Galarza and her daughter are seen clinging to her husband as masked ICE agents attempt to detain him. An agent can be heard saying, “Just grab her, pull her away,” while another grabs Moreta-Galarza’s hair to separate her from her husband. Her children, visibly distressed, watched as their father was taken away. Moreta-Galarza, overcome with grief and desperation, pleaded with the agents in Spanish, saying, “They are going to kill him,” referring to the dangers her husband would face if deported to Ecuador.

Moments later, in a separate video, Moreta-Galarza confronted an ICE officer in a hallway near an elevator bank. The officer, dressed in plain clothes with a badge around his neck, appeared dismissive, repeatedly saying “Adios” (Spanish for “goodbye”) as Moreta-Galarza begged for her husband’s release. She stated, “You guys don’t care about anything,” and at one point placed her hand on the officer’s chest, a gesture that appeared to be an emotional plea rather than an act of aggression. The officer responded by grabbing her, shoving her backward into a wall, and pushing her to the ground. As she lay on the floor, surrounded by her crying children and onlookers, including photographers and court officials, the officer stood over her, shouting for others to remove her from the building.

The incident left Moreta-Galarza shaken and physically harmed. She was taken to a hospital for evaluation, with concerns about possible head trauma from hitting the wall and floor. She later told reporters, “Over [in Ecuador], they beat us there too. I didn’t think I’d come here to the United States and the same thing would happen to me.” The videos, which spread rapidly online, drew condemnation from city officials, immigration advocates, and the public, who decried the officer’s use of excessive force and lack of compassion.

 The Individuals Involved

Monica Moreta-Galarza: The victim of the incident, Moreta-Galarza is an Ecuadorian mother who fled violence in her home country with her husband and two children, seeking asylum in the U.S. Her family’s ordeal at 26 Federal Plaza highlights the human toll of aggressive immigration enforcement policies. After the incident, she sought safety in the office of Representative Dan Goldman, who described her as traumatized but resilient.

The ICE Officer: The officer involved in the incident has not been publicly identified by name, per Department of Homeland Security (DHS) statements. Described as wearing plain clothes and a badge, he was recorded engaging in aggressive behavior, including pulling Moreta-Galarza’s hair and shoving her to the ground. Reports indicate this officer may have a history of volatile conduct, as court observers noted similar behavior, including forcibly separating a teenage girl from her father in a previous incident.

Key Public Figures:

- Representative Dan Goldman: A Democrat whose district includes 26 Federal Plaza, Goldman was a vocal critic of the officer’s actions. He provided refuge to Moreta-Galarza and her children in his office and called for disciplinary action from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. Goldman, along with New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, referred the officer to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and federal prosecutors for possible felony prosecution, citing excessive force and violation of Moreta-Galarza’s Fourth Amendment rights.

- Brad Lander: New York City’s comptroller and a frequent critic of ICE’s tactics, Lander was present at 26 Federal Plaza during the incident but did not witness it directly. He has been arrested twice at the facility for protesting ICE’s actions and attempting to inspect the holding cells on the 10th floor, which have been criticized for inhumane conditions. Lander condemned the officer’s actions as “lawless” and emphasized the need for accountability.

- Tricia McLaughlin: As DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, McLaughlin issued a statement condemning the officer’s conduct as “unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE.” She confirmed that the officer was relieved of his duties pending a full investigation.

 Update on the ICE Agent SEPT 26, 2025

Following the viral spread of the videos, the Department of Homeland Security acted swiftly, announcing on September 26, 2025, that the ICE officer involved was “relieved of his current duties” pending a full investigation. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin emphasized that ICE officers are held to “the highest professional standards” and that the officer’s behavior was unacceptable. However, it remains unclear whether the officer has been fully terminated or reassigned to other duties within ICE, as the agency has not provided further clarification.

City officials, including Goldman and Lander, have argued that relieving the officer of duties is insufficient. They have called for criminal prosecution, citing the officer’s use of excessive force and potential violation of Moreta-Galarza’s constitutional rights. A two-page referral from Goldman and Lander to federal prosecutors accused the officer of depriving Moreta-Galarza of her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. As of now, the Department of Justice has not confirmed whether it will pursue a felony case, as such decisions are at their discretion.

The incident has also fueled broader calls for oversight and reform at 26 Federal Plaza. On September 18, 2025, Lander and 10 other elected officials were arrested at the facility for attempting to inspect the 10th-floor holding cells, which have been described as overcrowded and unsanitary. Video evidence from July 2025 confirmed reports of inhumane conditions, including migrants sleeping on filthy floors and sharing a single bathroom among dozens. These conditions, coupled with the officer’s actions, have intensified demands to shut down the detention operations at the facility.

 The Context of 26 Federal Plaza

The Jacob K. Javits Federal Office Building at 26 Federal Plaza is a significant hub for federal operations in New York City. In addition to housing immigration courts and ICE’s New York field office, it is a processing center for Social Security hearings and other federal services. However, the building has become a flashpoint for controversy due to ICE’s aggressive tactics under the Trump administration’s immigration policies. Since May 2025, federal agents have been stationed in the hallways, arresting migrants immediately after their court hearings, a practice that critics argue violates due process and creates a climate of fear.

The facility has gained a reputation for rude and unprofessional staff and security personnel. Court observers and advocates have reported instances of dismissive or hostile behavior from ICE agents and security guards, including the use of excessive force and verbal taunts. The September 25 incident is not isolated; reports indicate that the same officer involved in Moreta-Galarza’s case was recorded aggressively arresting a court observer in August 2025 and forcibly separating a teenage girl from her father in a prior incident. These patterns have led to accusations that 26 Federal Plaza operates as a de facto detention center, despite DHS’s claims that it is merely a processing facility.

 Opinion: Balancing Law Enforcement and Human Dignity

The incident at 26 Federal Plaza raises complex questions about immigration enforcement, the rule of law, and the conduct of federal officers. From one perspective, illegal immigration is a violation of U.S. law, and those who enter the country without authorization must face the consequences, including detention and deportation. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, as amended, grants ICE the authority to detain and remove individuals who are in the U.S. illegally (8 U.S.C. § 1226). Immigrants who cross the border without proper documentation are aware of the legal risks, yet they choose to do so, often driven by dire circumstances such as violence or economic hardship. While their motivations may be understandable, the law is clear: unauthorized entry is grounds for deportation, and ICE is tasked with enforcing this mandate.

In the case of Monica Moreta-Galarza, her act of placing a hand on the ICE officer’s chest, though seemingly non-threatening, violated legal boundaries. Federal law prohibits physical interference with law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties. Under 18 U.S.C. § 111(a), assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer can result in penalties, including fines or imprisonment. While Moreta-Galarza’s action was likely an emotional response rather than an intent to harm, it provided the officer with a legal basis to respond. However, the officer’s reaction—pulling her hair, shoving her into a wall, and pushing her to the ground—was grossly disproportionate and unjustifiable.

The officer’s conduct was not only excessive but also unprofessional and abusive. His repeated use of “Adios” as a taunt was dismissive and dehumanizing, undermining the dignity of a woman in distress. Such behavior reflects poorly on ICE and erodes public trust in federal law enforcement. The officer’s prior actions, including pulling Moreta-Galarza’s hair and separating a teenage girl from her father, suggest a pattern of aggression that is incompatible with the “highest professional standards” touted by DHS. While ICE agents face challenging and often volatile situations, their training and protocols emphasize de-escalation and the use of minimal force, as noted by a former ICE official who stated there was “absolutely no” justification for the officer’s actions.

The broader environment at 26 Federal Plaza exacerbates these issues. The facility’s reputation for rude staff and aggressive security practices creates a hostile atmosphere for immigrants, many of whom are navigating complex legal processes under immense stress. The practice of courthouse arrests, which has intensified under the Trump administration, deters migrants from attending hearings, undermining due process and the integrity of the immigration system. While the law must be enforced, it should not come at the cost of basic human dignity or constitutional protections.

In conclusion, the incident at 26 Federal Plaza underscores the need for accountability and reform in immigration enforcement. ICE agents must adhere to strict standards of conduct, and those who engage in excessive force or unprofessional behavior should face severe consequences, including criminal prosecution if warranted. At the same time, immigrants must respect the legal boundaries of the country they seek to enter, understanding that violations carry consequences. Balancing enforcement with compassion is essential to maintaining a just and humane immigration system.

UPDATE: September 27, 2025 - ICE agent was reinstated.  

 Sources

- The Guardian, “Ice officer ‘relieved of duties’ after video shows him manhandling woman at New York immigration court,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/ice-officer-video-relieved-of-duties)

- The New York Times, “ICE Officer ‘Relieved of His Duties’ After Pushing Woman to Floor,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/nyregion/ice-officer-investigation-woman-shoved.html)

- The New York Times, “U.S. Agent Pushes Woman to Floor in Immigration Courthouse Confrontation,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/25/nyregion/ice-push-woman-nyc.html)

- CNN, “ICE officer who shoved a mother to the floor at an immigration courthouse is ‘relieved of his current duties,’ agency says,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/26/us/new-york-federal-agent-woman-confrontation-ice-hnk)

- CBS News, “Unacceptable: ICE officer relieved of duties after videos show him shoving woman to the ground,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-relieved-of-duties-video/)

- NPR, “ICE officer caught on video pushing woman is placed on leave,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.npr.org/2025/09/26/nx-s1-5554431/ice-officer-placed-on-leave)

- The Independent, “ICE agent slams woman to the ground and taunts ‘adios’ after her husband is detained in viral video,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ice-video-arrest-federal-plaza-new-york-b2834410.html)

- BBC, “ICE officer disciplined after shoving woman in New York,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4w23yjzj1o)

- Hindustan Times, “ICE agent relieved of duties after shoving woman at NYC courthouse, DHS calls officer’s act ‘unacceptable’,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/ice-agent-relieved-of-duties-after-shoving-woman-at-nyc-courthouse-dhs-calls-officers-act-unacceptable-101758902619703.html)

- Newsweek, “ICE Agent Relieved of Duty After Shoving Woman to Ground: ‘Unacceptable’,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agent-relieved-shoved-woman-immigration-court-nyc-10790513)

- CBS New York, “NYC comptroller says video shows ICE agent’s altercation with wife of detainee,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/federal-plaza-video-detainee-wife-shoved/)

- ABC7 New York, “ICE officer relieved of duties after violent confrontation in Manhattan courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza goes viral,” September 26, 2025[](https://abc7ny.com/post/ice-officer-relieved-duties-violent-confrontation-manhattan-courthouse-26-federal-plaza-goes-viral/17888417/)

- The Hill, “DHS says federal officer on leave after pushing woman to floor,” September 26, 2025[](https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5523674-ice-agent-shoves-woman-leave/)

- ABC News, “ICE officer ‘relieved of current duties’ after violent confrontation caught on camera,” September 26, 2025[](https://abcnews.go.com/US/ice-officer-relieved-current-duties-after-violent-confrontation/story?id=125974099)

- NBC New York, “ICE agent seen shoving detainee wife is relieved of duties,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.nbcnewyork.com/manhattan/ice-agent-suspended-video-federal-plaza/6396770/)

- Democracy Now!, “Video Shows ICE Agent Assaulting Ecuadorian Mother Inside 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.democracynow.org/2025/9/26/headlines/video_shows_ice_agent_assaulting_ecuadorian_mother_inside_26_federal_plaza_in_manhattan)

- New York Immigration Coalition, “New Video Shows Inhumane Conditions Inside ICE Detention Center at 26 Federal Plaza, ICE Breaking Oversight Law,” July 22, 2025[](https://www.nyic.org/2025/07/new-video-shows-inhumane-conditions-inside-ice-detention-center-at-26-federal-plaza-ice-breaking-oversight-law/)

- New York Daily News, “ICE agent recorded shoving woman to floor at NYC detention site is relieved of his duties,” September 26, 2025[](https://www.nydailynews.com/2025/09/26/ice-agent-recorded-shoving-woman-floor-nyc-detention-site-relieved-duties/)

- United States Code, Title 8, Section 1226, “Apprehension and detention of aliens”

- United States Code, Title 18, Section 111, “Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees”

Pope Francis' Letter to American Bishops on Immigration and JD Vance's Ordo Amoris

Pope Francis' Letter to American Bishops on Immigration and JD Vance's Ordo Amoris

In a recent letter to American bishops, Pope Francis addressed the pressing issue of immigration in the United States, criticizing the Trump administration's mass deportation policies. The Pope emphasized the importance of recognizing the dignity and humanity of migrants, stating that "the rightly formed conscience cannot fail to make a critical judgment and express its disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality".

Pope Francis' letter comes in response to the Trump administration's efforts to deport undocumented immigrants en masse. The Pope acknowledged the right of a nation to defend itself from those who have committed violent or serious crimes but condemned any measure that equates illegal status with criminality. He highlighted the vulnerability and defenselessness of migrants who often leave their home countries due to extreme poverty, insecurity, exploitation, persecution, or environmental degradation.

The Pope also indirectly addressed comments made by Vice President JD Vance, who invoked the ancient Christian concept of "ordo amoris" (order of love) to defend the administration's anti-immigration policies. Vance argued that one should prioritize love for one's family, neighbors, community, and fellow citizens before extending it to others. Pope Francis countered this interpretation, stating that "the true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the 'Good Samaritan'". He emphasized the need for a fraternity open to all, without exception.

Pope Francis' letter serves as a reminder of the Christian duty to care for the most vulnerable and to promote a more compassionate approach to immigration. It challenges the narrative that equates illegal status with criminality and calls for a more humane and just treatment of migrants.

In conclusion, Pope Francis' letter to American bishops is a powerful call for compassion and justice in the face of harsh immigration policies. It underscores the importance of recognizing the dignity of every human being and promoting a more inclusive and loving society.

 

Vatican City and Illegal Immigration: A Complex Issue

Vatican City and Illegal Immigration: A Complex Issue

Vatican City, the smallest independent state in the world, has recently taken steps to address the issue of illegal immigration within its borders. This move has sparked discussions and debates about the unique challenges faced by this tiny city-state and its approach to maintaining security and order.

Background

Vatican City, with a population of just over 800 inhabitants, is a unique entity both politically and geographically. It is the spiritual and administrative center of the Roman Catholic Church and home to the Pope. Given its small size and significant religious and cultural importance, the Vatican faces distinct challenges when it comes to managing its borders and ensuring the safety of its residents and visitors.

Recent Measures

In response to concerns about illegal entry, the Vatican has recently implemented stricter measures to prevent unauthorized access to its territory. A decree issued by the Holy See has significantly increased the penalties for those who attempt to enter Vatican City illegally. The new regulations include monetary fines ranging from 10,000 to 25,000 euros and prison sentences of one to four years for those who bypass border controls or security systems through violence, threats, or deception.

Additionally, individuals who enter with expired permits or fail to meet the established requirements face administrative sanctions ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 euros. The decree also stipulates that unauthorized overflight of Vatican airspace, including the use of drones, may result in prison sentences of six months to three years and fines up to 25,000 euros.

Pope Francis' Stance

Pope Francis has been a vocal advocate for the rights and dignity of migrants and refugees. He has consistently called for compassionate and humane treatment of those seeking refuge and has criticized policies that exclude or harm migrants. In a recent interview, Pope Francis condemned the mass deportation plans proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, describing them as a "disgrace" and emphasizing the need for just and humane solutions to immigration issues.

Balancing Security and Compassion

The Vatican's approach to illegal immigration reflects a delicate balance between maintaining security and upholding the Church's teachings on compassion and human dignity. While the new measures aim to protect the city-state from unauthorized entry and potential threats, they also highlight the broader challenges faced by nations and communities worldwide in addressing immigration issues.

Conclusion

The Vatican City's recent actions to address illegal immigration underscore the complexities of managing security in a small, yet highly significant, territory. As the world continues to grapple with immigration challenges, the Vatican's approach serves as a reminder of the need to balance security with compassion and respect for human dignity.

Sources:

: [Catholic News Agency](https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261557/vatican-cracks-down-on-illegal-entry-into-its-territory)

: [La Croix International](https://international.la-croix.com/religion/pope-urges-trump-to-foster-a-just-society-calls-deportation-plan-a-disgrace)

The Catholic Church's Teachings on Immigration and Illegal Immigration

The Catholic Church's Teachings on Immigration and Illegal Immigration

The Catholic Church has long been a vocal advocate for the rights and dignity of immigrants. Rooted in its social teachings, the Church emphasizes the importance of welcoming the stranger and providing support to those in need, regardless of their legal status. Here, we explore the key principles and teachings of the Catholic Church on immigration and illegal immigration.

Biblical Foundations

The Church's stance on immigration is deeply rooted in biblical teachings. Both the Old and New Testaments contain numerous references to the treatment of foreigners and the importance of hospitality. For instance, Leviticus 19:33-34 states, "When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt." Similarly, in the New Testament, Jesus emphasizes the importance of welcoming strangers in Matthew 25:35, "For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me."

Catholic Social Teaching

Catholic social teaching provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the Church's position on immigration. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) outlines three basic principles of Catholic social teaching on immigration:

1. People have the right to migrate to sustain their lives and the lives of their families.** This principle recognizes that individuals have the right to seek better living conditions and opportunities when they are unable to find them in their home countries.

2. A country has the right to regulate its borders and control immigration.** While the Church acknowledges the right of nations to manage their borders, it emphasizes that this must be done in a manner that respects human dignity and the rights of individuals.

3. A country must regulate its borders with justice and mercy.** The Church calls for immigration policies that are humane and just, prioritizing the protection of human rights and the dignity of all individuals.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church

The Catechism of the Catholic Church further elaborates on the Church's teachings on immigration. It states, "The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin". This teaching underscores the moral responsibility of wealthier nations to provide refuge and support to those fleeing difficult circumstances.

Papal Encyclicals and Statements

Over the years, various popes have reinforced the Church's teachings on immigration. Pope Francis, in particular, has been a strong advocate for the rights of migrants and refugees. He has called for a compassionate and humane approach to immigration, emphasizing the need to protect the dignity and rights of all individuals. Pope Benedict XVI also articulated the Church's position, stating that while nations have the right to regulate migration, they must do so in a way that respects human dignity and human rights.

The Catholic Church’s teachings on illegal immigration are rooted in its broader social doctrine, which emphasizes the dignity of every human person, the common good, and a balance between compassion and justice. These teachings do not provide a simple endorsement or condemnation of illegal immigration but instead offer a nuanced framework that considers the rights and responsibilities of individuals, nations, and the global community. As of March 10, 2025, this perspective remains shaped by Scripture, papal writings, and statements from bodies like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), reflecting both timeless principles and responses to contemporary challenges.

At the heart of the Church’s stance is the belief that all people, regardless of legal status, possess inherent dignity as creations of God. This stems from biblical calls to welcome the stranger, such as Leviticus 19:34—“The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt”—and Matthew 25:35, where Jesus identifies with the marginalized: “I was a stranger and you welcomed me.” The Church sees the Holy Family’s flight to Egypt as an archetype of refugees, reinforcing a moral imperative to care for those displaced or in need. Pope Pius XII, in his 1952 apostolic constitution Exsul Familia, underscored this by placing the Church “squarely on the side of those seeking a better life by fleeing their homes,” a position echoed by subsequent popes.

The first key principle is the right to migrate. Catholic teaching holds that individuals have a natural right to move to sustain their lives and those of their families when conditions in their homeland—poverty, violence, or persecution—make a dignified life impossible. Pope John XXIII, in his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris, affirmed this, stating that people may emigrate “when there are just reasons in favor of it.” This right is not absolute, however; it’s framed as a response to necessity, not a blanket entitlement to cross borders at will. Pope Francis has often highlighted this, as in his 2024 Angelus address, where he decried “systematic” efforts to repel migrants as a “grave sin,” urging nations to prioritize human life over rigid exclusion.

Yet, this right is balanced by a second principle: a nation’s right to regulate its borders. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 2241) states, “Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions.” This acknowledges that countries can set immigration policies to protect their social, economic, and cultural stability. The Church does not advocate for “open borders” in the political sense; rather, it recognizes sovereignty as legitimate when exercised justly. The USCCB has noted that enforcing immigration laws isn’t inherently contrary to Catholic teaching, provided it aligns with the common good and doesn’t dehumanize individuals.

A third principle ties these together: regulation must be tempered with mercy and justice. While nations can control borders, the Church insists this be done humanely. It condemns policies that criminalize mere survival-driven migration or exploit undocumented individuals’ vulnerability. The 2003 joint pastoral letter by U.S. and Mexican bishops, Strangers No Longer: Together on the Journey of Hope, calls for reforms to address root causes like poverty and war, arguing that punitive measures alone—like mass deportations without due process—violate human dignity. The Church also opposes separating families or deporting people to dangerous conditions unless they pose a clear threat (e.g., violent criminals).

Regarding illegal immigration specifically, the Church avoids blanket approval or rejection. It distinguishes between persons and their actions: while entering a country without authorization may break civil law, the person retains God-given rights to basic needs—food, shelter, healthcare. Pope John Paul II, in his 1996 World Day of Migrants and Refugees message, wrote, “In the Church no one is a stranger… illegal immigrants are also recognized and accepted as brothers and sisters.” This drives Catholic ministries, like Catholic Charities, to serve undocumented migrants with aid, legal help, and advocacy, viewing such work as a Gospel mandate (Matthew 25) rather than a political stance. Critics, like Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in 2024 lawsuits against groups like Annunciation House, have accused such efforts of facilitating illegal activity, but the Church frames them as acts of mercy within legal bounds, protected by religious freedom.

The Church also emphasizes the right not to migrate, urging wealthier nations to address migration’s causes—war, economic disparity, climate crises—through global cooperation. Fratelli Tutti (2020) by Pope Francis argues, “Ideally, unnecessary migration ought to be avoided” by fostering conditions for a dignified life in home countries. This long-term vision contrasts with short-term debates over border security, pushing for a holistic approach over unilateral crackdowns.

In practice, this teaching creates tension. The USCCB has long called for U.S. immigration reform, criticizing a “broken” system that keeps families apart or punishes “Dreamers” brought as children. They advocate legal pathways for undocumented residents who’ve integrated—some 80% of whom have lived in the U.S. for over a decade, per estimates—contributing economically (e.g., $100 billion in taxes yearly). Yet, they don’t deny a nation’s prerogative to deport in specific cases, like security risks, provided it’s not “indiscriminate” or “massive,” as Cardinal McElroy warned in 2025 against Trump-era proposals.

Critics from various sides misread this balance. Some conservatives claim the Church supports unchecked illegal entry, pointing to Francis’s rhetoric; posts on X in early 2025 accused him of contradicting the Catechism by opposing deportations outright. Progressives, meanwhile, argue the Church doesn’t go far enough, expecting full amnesty advocacy. Both miss the nuance: the Church seeks a middle path—compassion without chaos, order without cruelty. It’s less about dictating policy than challenging all sides to prioritize human dignity over political expediency, a stance that, as of March 10, 2025, remains both timeless and tested by today’s polarized debates.

Conclusion

The Catholic Church's teachings on immigration and illegal immigration are grounded in biblical principles, social teaching, and the moral imperative to uphold human dignity. The Church calls for a balanced approach that respects the rights of individuals to seek better opportunities while recognizing the right of nations to manage their borders. Ultimately, the Church advocates for policies that are just, humane, and reflective of the inherent dignity of every person.

Pope Francis: "Grave Sin" Not to Offer Aid to Migrant Vessels

Pope Francis has been a vocal advocate for migrants, emphasizing the moral imperative to aid those in need. In a recent address, he strongly condemned the act of turning away migrants, labeling it a "grave sin." This stance is consistent with his long-standing message of acceptance and compassion towards migrants, urging societies to create safe and legal pathways for those seeking refuge from war, violence, persecution, and poverty.

The Pope's words come at a time when immigration is a contentious issue globally, sparking intense debate and varied reactions. His call for a global governance of migration based on justice, fraternity, and solidarity challenges individuals and nations to reflect on their responsibilities towards migrants. He emphasizes that indifference and rejection are the true dangers migrants face, not just the perilous journeys they undertake.

Pope Francis' appeal is not just to political leaders but to everyone, encouraging a collective effort to combat human trafficking and support migrants. He highlights the role of prayer and moral support in addition to direct action, suggesting that everyone has a part to play in addressing this humanitarian crisis.

The Pope's message is a powerful reminder of the shared humanity that binds us all and the ethical obligations that come with it. It's a call to look beyond borders and politics and to see the faces of individuals and families in desperate need of help. As the leader of the Catholic Church, Pope Francis' words carry significant weight, and it remains to be seen how his call for action will influence the global conversation and policies on migration.

As usual, those who subscribe to conservatism took to heart the pope's works and attacked him. Among the vitriolic attitude were Catholics including armchair pundits Taylor R. Marshall who tweeted the typical "Vatican has walls" meme which was created in an attempt to make the pope look like a hypocrite. He also doubled down by asking how many migrants the Vatican has taken in.  

Anyone with basic geography skills or who has visited the Vatican knows that the Vatican does not have a wall closing it off to the rest of the world. Moreover, those of us who read and are aware of current events know that the pope and Vatican accepted several migrant family into the Vatican (see: Vatican Houses Syrian Refugee Family | TIME).  As usual, just like leftists, conservatives also love to play the sophism game creating false narratives and pushing them on social media where naive people who subscribe to their idealogies do not bother to vet them and accept them as factual.

Shame on Taylor Marshall and other Catholics for pushing this inhumane and anti-Christ rhetoric. Jesus said to love one another. Sacred Scripture says to welcome the stranger (see: Leviticus 19:33-34). Pope Francis was just echoing the message found in Sacred Scripture, the Word of God!  

However, it is important to note that the Catholic Church does not teach an open borders all come in doctrine. The Church is clear that nations should help migrants, illegal immigrants, illegal migrants, refugees, illegal aliens, undocumented person, whatever term you want to use.  However, the Church states clearly that nations have a right to protect their borders, have a process of entry and that those entering the nation must respect the hosting nation. See below:

That being stated, there is no reason for people to get upset at the Pope for following God and echoing God's desires that we welcome the stranger and love one another.  Only the devil is about division. Marshall, other Catholics and conservatives that have a disdain for people seeking help in foreign nations have to decide who they want to follow.  They are following the devil now with their rhetoric. Jesus was never about pushing people away who sought help legitimately.   

The pope's comments were most likely in response to a video circulating of Spain's coast guard crushing a boat full of migrants with their own motor boat.

This video has prompted a lot of reaction from social media users, most condemning it while some celebrating Spain for doing this.  Among them are clergy from many religious denominations including Calvin Robinson, a self-professed "priest" of the "Old Catholic" denomination (see:Fr Calvin Robinson on X: "Migrant dinghy crushed by Spanish police boat. It can be done. The Spaniards know how to Reconquesta. https://t.co/2FBaPEmIhf" / X)

Robinson was met with both criticism and praise for this callous post on X (formerly Twitter).  Despite the criticism, Robinson continued to defend his remarks.  

Pope Francis is the son of immigrants from Italy who settled in Argentina.  Therefore, it is understandable why he speaks about accepting migrants and caring for them. He knows first hand the hardships they face.  

Source:

Pope: Driving away migrants is a 'grave sin' | USCCB

Pope Francis says refusing aid to migrants a 'grave sin' | Reuters

Pope Francis: Intentionally hurting migrants ‘is a grave sin’ | Catholic News Agency

Pope Francis: Rejecting migrants is a ‘grave sin’ | America Magazine

Pope Francis denounces anti-migrant measures as grave sins (thehill.com)

Pope Francis says those who 'repel' migrants are committing 'grave sin' (mynbc15.com)

Migrant morality: Pope doubles down on message of acceptance | USCCB

Pope Francis calls denying help to migrants a 'grave sin' (newsnationnow.com)

Illegal Migrants to Received Pre-Paid Debit Cards

As American citizens in New York City struggle to pay the high rents, utilities, and inflation driven prices of food, gas and other necessities, illegal migrants will get free money. 

A family of four migrants with two children under age 17 could receive up to $15,200 a year under New York City's controversial new $53 million program that provides pre-paid credit cards to asylum seekers. The initiative, known as the Immediate Response Card, aims to assist migrants with food expenses while they await authorization to work from the federal government.

How It Works

- The pre-paid credit cards are not traditional credit cards; they are **pre-paid debit cards** specifically designated for purchasing food and baby supplies.

- Participants can use these cards at bodegas, grocery stores, supermarkets, and convenience stores.

- The program is designed to cut costs and replace the current food services offered in short-term hotel shelters.

- As part of a one-year pilot program, the city will initially roll out the pre-paid cards to 500 newly arrived families at the Roosevelt Hotel. If successful, it could expand to include a maximum of 6,500 families.

Amounts Received by Asylum Seeker Families

- A single migrant could receive $345 per month.

- A family of three could receive $932 per month.

- A family of four could net a $1,195 allowance per month for use at designated retailers.

- Monthly amounts increase for those with children: $100 per month for kids under 5 and $36 for children aged 5 to 17 years.

- Pregnant asylum seekers can also receive an additional $36 per month on their pre-paid cards.

Savings and Economic Stimulus

- New York City has allocated $53 million to this pilot program, which officials estimate will save $600,000 per month and $7.2 million annually.

- Beyond cost savings, officials hope that using these cards at local retailers will help stimulate the local economy.

In summary, while some social media posts have mischaracterized this program as providing credit cards to migrants, it is important to clarify that these are pre-paid debit cards specifically intended for essential goods like food and baby supplies. The goal is to support migrants while they await work authorization from the federal government.

While the need to care for strangers is biblical, we need to be smart about it. We have our own people who need help, particularly veterans who sacrificed their lives to serve our nation. Next we have the poor who are poor through no fault of their own and those bordering poverty who struggle to pay the exaggerated rents and bills in New York City. Let us not forget our schools which are often neglected. Students do not use textbooks anymore. They have outdated comptuers, I-Pads and tablets. The list goes on and on. We have our own problems and need to care for our own first before we can even attempt to help others. This is why the border needs to be closed and a vetting system installed so that those migrants can come legally and with genuine intentions to work in this nation and hopefully become a citizen. 

Giving out pre-paid debit or credit cards is unfair to taxpayers who did not ask for their money to be spent in this way. Moreover, it will give illegal immigrants an incentive to come here even more. If you can go into another nation, get bussed to a city and given free food and housing and now money, what do you think will happen next?  We will see an influx of illegal immigrants flocking for this dream turned reality.  The desire to work will vanish as it often happens with Americans on the Welfare, SNAP, face-to-face system. They become complacent despite the hardships these programs give when applying and maintaining a case.  

Again, elections have consequences. If New Yorkers continue to vote for politicians who endorse an open border and favoring illegal immigrantion over American citizens, then this will continue. We are already seeing the crime wave being perpetuated by a good number of these illegal migrants.  It is an invasion and our taxpayers are paying for it.  Let us help those who truly need it but do it wisely. 

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  

---

Sources:

1. [NYC migrant families could make up to $15K per year under controversial $53M pre-paid credit card program](https://nypost.com/2024/02/20/us-news/nyc-migrant-families-could-make-up-to-15k-per-year-under-controversial-53m-pre-paid-credit-card-program/)

2. [Migrants in New York City will receive prepaid debit cards, not credit cards, for designated goods](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-nyc-migrants-credit-debit-cards-prepaid-240335300869)

3. [NYC to offer migrants $53M in pre-paid credit cards, report says](https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americ 

NYC migrant families could make up to $15K per year under controversial $53M pre-paid credit card program (nypost.com)

Attack on NYPD Officers in Times Square: No Bail for Suspects Sparks Controversy

A recent attack on two NYPD officers in Times Square has ignited outrage and raised questions about the handling of suspects involved. Critics are demanding answers as to why some of the arrested individuals were quickly released back onto the streets without bail.

The Incident

Nearly a week ago, a group of attackers assaulted two police officers in Times Square, resulting in injuries. The incident left many wondering why certain suspects were not held in custody pending trial.

The Bail Decision

The Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, initially avoided addressing why his office did not seek bail for several of the suspects. Some of these individuals have reportedly fled the state since their release. When questioned by NBC New York, Bragg declined to comment on whether not requesting bail was a mistake. Instead, he simply stated, "We'll speak in court."

Public Outcry and Demands for Accountability

The decision not to seek bail has sparked controversy. Critics argue that an assault on police officers should warrant detention. New York Governor Kathy Hochul expressed her disagreement with the suspects' release and called for their deportation. She emphasized that the issue lies not with weak bail laws but with failing to utilize existing laws effectively.

Behind Closed Doors

Governor Hochul met privately with DA Bragg to discuss the incident. Although Bragg was absent when Hochul emerged for a news conference with other district attorneys from Queens, Brooklyn, and Westchester, she expressed confidence that additional charges would be brought against the attackers.

Clarification from DA Bragg

Hours later, Alvin Bragg held a press conference to clarify his position. He asserted that assaults on police officers would not be tolerated. Bragg watched video footage to identify each suspect's role in the group assault.

The situation remains contentious as authorities grapple with balancing justice and public safety. The decision not to seek bail has drawn scrutiny, and further developments are anticipated as investigations continue.

This story is just mind-boggling.  There was once a time when it was a felony to attack a police officer. How times have changed!  These illegal immigrants attack two cops and then are released. It was said they fled the state of New York to California or Mexico, but this was disproved. A few of them were arrested again for other crimes.  This is just despicable.  The DA claims they did not have enough evidence to keep these thugs in jail, yet we have a clear video of the attack. What more do they need?

Luckily, pressure from fellow liberals brought the DA to charge these thugs and issue arrest warrants. They are now going to face justice and will hopefully be deported and barred from reentering the country. It is a bad time to be an NYPD officer now with these politicians in power. The Bail Reform law has empowered criminals to do this. The open borders and lawlessness there have empowered these ungrateful illegal immigrants to come here and commit crimes believing they will get scott-free.  Elections have consequences. New Yorkers and other "sanctuary cities" need to wake up. We cannot continue on this path.  

The Federal Government must also secure the border and vet whoever wants to enter this country legally. We cannot have people storming the border like a horde of zombies or walkers from the Walking Dead franchise. These thugs who attacked the NYPD officers are said to be members of gangs in South and Central America.  These are the people we are letting into our nation.  

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  

Source:

https://nypost.com/2024/02/18/us-news/who-are-the-migrants-charged-with-attacking-nypd-cops-a-look-at-the-asylum-seekers-charged-in-times-square-melee/

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/immigration-advocates-show-up-to-support-nypd-times-square-attack-suspect-yohenry-brito/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/5-asylum-seekers-arrested-assault-police-officers-times/story?id=106825390

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/02/09/new-york-police-times-square-video/

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/da-bragg-finally-addresses-why-no-bail-was-sought-for-suspects-in-nypd-times-square-attack/5100701/

https://abc7ny.com/nyc-crime-officers-attacked-time-square-nypd/14380425/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68185611

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegals-who-caught-bus-out-nyc-after-attack-police-may-have-gotten-free-ride-us-taxpayers-sources

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13088933/migrant-times-square-cops-beating-arraignment.html

https://www.mynbc5.com/article/nypd-officers-attacked-times-square/46627453

https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/16/bail-set-in-manhattan-court-for-five-migrants-accused-in-times-square-assault-on-nypd/

Yorman Reveron, NYC migrant accused of beating cops, whines as judge sets $100K bail (nypost.com)

NYC Restricts Constitution to Protect Illegal Aliens

As a New Yorker, born in Manhattan and raised in The Bronx, I am ashamed of my home city. The Twitter account for New York City tweeted out this graphic stating that it is now illegal to "threaten to call ICE" on illegal immigrants and that it is illegal to tell someone to "go back to your country."  They also will penalize anyone who calls illegal immigrants "illegal aliens."  No, this is not satire, the Onion or a parody post. This is for real! 

BREAKING:
New York City has made it illegal to threaten to call ICE based on a discriminatory motive or to tell someone "go back to your country." Hate has no place here. pic.twitter.com/8PaIozjQty

— City of New York (@nycgov) September 26, 2019

The new law is unconstitutional. It violates the first amendment. One does not have to be a Constitutional scholar to see this.  ICE exists to arrest people who are here illegally. They are a federal law enforcement agency. To tell a city that they cannot be called is an affront to the first amendment and the rule of law. Moreover, to make the phrase "go back to your country" is the restriction of free speech by the government. This is a gross attack on freedom of speech which is guaranteed by the first amendment.  The government cannot restrict or dictate the speech of the people.

The news has angered many people, both conservative and liberal who value the United States Constitution. This law will not stand in court. I am sure it will be taken to court.  Citizens have a right and duty to call ICE to report illegal immigrants, especially those who have violated a warrant or committed other crimes. Moreover, while telling someone to go back to their country can be rude, it is not discriminatory.

I invite all New Yorkers and Americans to voice their concerns over this new law and encourage lawyers to take the city to court for this gross violation of the first amendment.


What do you think?  Post below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules for commenting.



UPDATED: 10/1/19
The Twitter account for NYC deleted the original tweet which was stormed with disapproval by many and retweeted it as a pinned tweet.  Here it is.

BREAKING:
New York City has made it illegal to threaten to call ICE based on a discriminatory motive or to tell someone "go back to your country." Hate has no place here. pic.twitter.com/1rgQ52oI68

— City of New York (@nycgov) October 1, 2019