Happy New Year 2026 from Sacerdotus Ministry

Happy New Year 2026 from Sacerdotus Ministry

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

As we bid farewell to 2025 and welcome the dawn of 2026, Sacerdotus Ministry extends heartfelt greetings of joy, peace, and hope in our Lord Jesus Christ. The turning of the year reminds us of God's eternal mercy and the promise of new beginnings through His grace.

This past year brought profound moments of both sorrow and triumph for the Church and the world. We mourned the passing of our beloved Pope Francis in April, a shepherd who called us to mercy, care for the poor, and protection of creation. Yet, in God's providence, the conclave swiftly elected Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, who has already inspired us with calls for unity, bridge-building, and fidelity to the Gospel amid modern challenges.

Within the Church, we witnessed encouraging signs of renewal: a noticeable increase in Catholicism worldwide, surging Bible sales reaching record highs, a decline in atheism as souls seek truth, more young people returning to Mass with fervor, and a beautiful proliferation of Eucharistic processions drawing thousands into adoration of our Lord truly present in the Blessed Sacrament. Cardinal Dolan's resignation from the Archdiocese of New York marked a transition, yet it opens doors for fresh pastoral leadership under the Holy Father's guidance.

Beyond the Church, 2025 unveiled wonders in creation, with the discovery and close passage of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS—a third visitor from beyond our solar system—alongside other remarkable scientific achievements that point to the vastness and order of God's universe.

Yet, we cannot ignore the shadows: persistent inflation straining families, countless deaths from illness and tragedy, ongoing wars and global political tensions sowing division, conflicts over immigration policies including those involving ICE, and the troubling expansion of physician-assisted suicide laws in several jurisdictions, devaluing the sacred gift of life.

Humanity remains in development—a primitive species still grappling with sin, selfishness, and suffering. But we can do better. If we model our societies after Jesus Christ—embracing His teachings of love, justice, forgiveness, and sacrificial service—we will build a civilization of love, life, peace, and true progress.

Let us enter 2026 with renewed commitment to evangelization, prayer, and charity.

Prayer for the New Year:

Heavenly Father,  

As we step into 2026, we thank You for the graces of the past year and entrust this new one to Your loving care. Bless it abundantly with Your peace, wisdom, and strength. Guide Pope Leo XIV and the Church in proclaiming Your truth. Heal our divided world, comfort the afflicted, and draw all souls closer to Your Son.  

We commend to Your mercy the souls of those we lost in 2025, especially Pope Francis and all the faithful departed—grant them eternal rest and let perpetual light shine upon them.  

Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Mary, Mother of God, pray for us!

Happy New Year!  

Sacerdotus Ministry

PS. Things have been rough. We need to pay a lot of bills. Please be generous and help us with a donation. Those who donate $100 or more will receive a Rosary touched to the first- and second-class relics of St. Carlo Acutis.  To donate see: Sacerdotus: Please Help Our Ministry

The True Origins of Christmas: Decoding the December 25 Date and Debunking Pagan Myths

The True Origins of Christmas: Decoding the December 25 Date and Debunking Pagan Myths

 Introduction: Understanding the Graphic

The graphic you shared beautifully illustrates a longstanding Christian tradition for calculating the date of Jesus Christ's birth. It depicts a timeline connecting key scriptural events from the Gospel of Luke:

- The Annunciation to Zechariah (Elizabeth's conception of John the Baptist) on Tishri 15 (around September 25 in the modern calendar), linked to Luke 1:13.

- Six months later, the Annunciation to Mary (conception of Jesus) on March 25, per Luke 1:26.

- Nine months after that, the birth of Jesus on December 25, citing Luke 2:7.

This calculation rests on early Christian interpretations of Luke's Gospel, combined with theological ideas about symmetry in sacred history. The graphic emphasizes that John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus, as stated in Luke 1:36.

Far from being a modern invention or pagan borrowing, this timeline reflects reasoning found in early Church writings. December 25 emerged not from Roman festivals but from sincere efforts by second- and third-century Christians to align Jesus' life with biblical chronology and symbolic theology.

This blog post explores how early Christians arrived at December 25, what Church Fathers said about it, and why common claims of pagan origins—links to Sol Invictus, Mithras, Saturnalia, or borrowed myths—do not hold up to historical scrutiny.

 The Biblical and Theological Basis for December 25

The Bible does not specify Jesus' birth date. Luke mentions shepherds in fields (Luke 2:8), suggesting spring or fall rather than winter, but provides no exact day. Early Christians focused more on Easter than the Nativity.

By the third century, interest grew in calculating the date. Two main ideas drove this:

1. The "Integral Age" or "Perfect Life" Theory: Jewish tradition held that great prophets lived whole years and died on their conception or birth anniversary. Christians applied this to Jesus, making his conception and death coincide.

2. Linking Conception to Passion: Many believed Jesus was conceived on the same date as his crucifixion—often March 25 in the Western calendar (near Passover).

Adding nine months yielded December 25.

 Key Early Evidence

- Hippolytus of Rome (c. 170–235 AD): In his Commentary on Daniel (c. 204 AD), Hippolytus states Jesus was born on December 25. A statue base from his time also records this. His calculations tied creation, incarnation, and passion symbolically.

- Sextus Julius Africanus (c. 221 AD): Linked conception to the spring equinox (March 25), implying birth on December 25.

- Chronography of 354: This Roman calendar lists "Natus Christus in Betleem Judeae" on December 25, reflecting practice by 336 AD.

These predate Emperor Aurelian's 274 AD Sol Invictus festival.

 The Role of Luke's Timeline

Luke 1 ties events together:

- Zechariah serves in the temple (linked by some to Yom Kippur, Tishri 10).

- Elizabeth conceives soon after.

- Six months later, Mary is visited (Luke 1:26, 36).

Variations in Passover dates led to different birth dates: March 25 conception → December 25 birth (West); April 6 → January 6 (some East, still used by Armenians).

John Chrysostom (c. 386 AD) defended December 25 using census records and priestly courses.

Augustine of Hippo (early 5th century) accepted December 25, using it symbolically in On the Trinity.

The graphic's timeline aligns with this tradition: Elizabeth's annunciation in fall, Mary's in spring, Jesus' birth in winter.

 What the Church Fathers Said

Early Fathers show growing consensus:

- Clement of Alexandria (c. 200 AD): Discussed dates but not December 25 specifically.

- Hippolytus: Earliest explicit December 25 reference.

- Gregory of Nazianzus and John Chrysostom (late 4th century): Preached on December 25 as established.

- Augustine and Ambrose: Saw it as providential, with Christ as the "true sun" overcoming darkness.

No Father claims the date was chosen to replace pagan festivals. They present it as historical or theological truth.

 Refuting the Pagan Origins Myths

The "pagan Christmas" claim arose in the 17th–19th centuries but lacks ancient support. Here's a breakdown:

 1. Sol Invictus

Emperor Aurelian established this in 274 AD. Evidence for December 25 is late (post-336 AD calendar). Scholars like Steven Hijmans argue no major pre-Christian Sol festival existed on that date; Aurelian may have responded to growing Christian observance.

Christians predated it (Hippolytus, 204 AD). Fathers like Ambrose called Christ the "true sun"—reclaiming symbolism, not borrowing.

 2. Mithras

No ancient source says Mithras was born December 25. Mithras emerged from rock (not virgin birth), with no birthday festival recorded. Claims stem from 19th-century speculation, debunked by experts like Roger Beck.

 3. Saturnalia

This ran December 17–23, never December 25. Feasting and gifts occurred, but no direct link. Early Christians criticized pagan excess, not imitation.

 4. Dionysus/Bacchus or Other Gods

No evidence for December 25 births. Parallels (virgin birth, resurrection) are exaggerated or false.

 5. Borrowed Myth or Syncretism

Early Christians rejected paganism fiercely. Origen mocked birthday celebrations as pagan. The date arose from internal calculation, not accommodation.

The first pagan-link claim appears in a 12th-century marginal note—centuries after establishment.

 6. Dionysius Exiguus

This 6th-century monk created the AD system but assumed an existing December 25 date; he did not invent it.

Scholarly consensus (e.g., Thomas Talley, Andrew McGowan): December 25 originated from Christian theology, predating or influencing any pagan use.

 Why Does the Myth Persist?

Anti-Christian propaganda (e.g., Emperor Julian) and modern comparative religion overstated parallels. It fits narratives of Christianity as derivative, ignoring evidence.

Christmas celebrates the Incarnation—God becoming man (John 1:14). The date, though traditional, points to this truth.

 Conclusion: A Christian Feast Rooted in Scripture and Tradition

The graphic captures authentic early Christian reasoning: biblical timeline from Luke, theological symmetry, and belief in Jesus as light in darkness.

December 25 is not pagan; it reflects faithful attempts to honor Christ's birth. As we celebrate, focus on the miracle: "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us."

Merry Christmas!

 References and Sources

- Biblical Archaeology Society: "How December 25 Became Christmas" by Andrew McGowan.

- T.C. Schmidt, "Calculating December 25 as the Birth of Jesus in Hippolytus’ Canon and Chronicon," Vigiliae Christianae 69.5 (2015).

- Steven Hijmans, "Sol Invictus, the Winter Solstice, and the Origins of Christmas," Mouseion (2003).

- Thomas J. Talley, The Origins of the Liturgical Year (1986).

- William Tighe, "Calculating Christmas," Touchstone Magazine (2003).

- Catholic Encyclopedia (New Advent): Entries on "Christmas" and "Chronology of Christ."

- Hippolytus of Rome, Commentary on Daniel (trans. T.C. Schmidt).

- Augustine, On the Trinity and sermons.

- John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Nativity.

For primary texts: Early Church Fathers collections (e.g., Ante-Nicene Fathers series).

Remembering Pope Benedict XVI: The Einstein of Theology

Remembering Pope Benedict XVI: The Einstein of Theology

On December 31, 2022, the Catholic Church and the world bid farewell to one of the most profound theological minds of the modern era: Pope Benedict XVI, born Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger. Often hailed as the "Einstein of theology" for his brilliant intellect and ability to illuminate complex doctrines with clarity and depth, Benedict left an indelible mark on the Church through his scholarship, leadership, and unwavering commitment to truth. As we reflect on his life—now, in this new year of 2026—his legacy endures as a beacon of faithful reasoning in an age of relativism.

 A Life Rooted in Faith and Intellect

Joseph Ratzinger was born on April 16, 1927, in Marktl am Inn, Bavaria, Germany, into a devout Catholic family during a turbulent time in European history. His early years were overshadowed by the rise of Nazism; as a young man, he was briefly enrolled in the Hitler Youth and auxiliary anti-aircraft service, experiences that deepened his aversion to totalitarianism and his appreciation for the Church as a refuge of truth and freedom.

Ordained a priest in 1951 alongside his brother Georg, Ratzinger pursued advanced studies in theology, earning his doctorate in 1953 with a dissertation on St. Augustine's doctrine of the Church. His habilitation thesis focused on St. Bonaventure's theology of history. By the late 1950s, he had established himself as a highly regarded professor, teaching at institutions like Freising, Bonn, Münster, Tübingen, and Regensburg. Influenced by thinkers such as Romano Guardini and the Church Fathers, Ratzinger's early work blended profound scholarship with pastoral sensitivity.

As a peritus (expert advisor) at the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965), the young theologian initially aligned with reformist ideas, contributing to a more pastoral expression of doctrine. However, witnessing the student protests of 1968 and what he perceived as departures from tradition, his views shifted toward a stronger defense of orthodoxy. He saw these events as linked to secularization and relativism, prompting a lifelong commitment to preserving the Church's core teachings.

In 1977, Pope Paul VI appointed him Archbishop of Munich and Freising, and later that year elevated him to cardinal. Under Pope John Paul II, Ratzinger served as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1981 to 2005—a role where he became known as the guardian of Catholic doctrine, overseeing the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992) and addressing theological controversies.

Elected pope on April 19, 2005, at age 78, he took the name Benedict XVI in honor of St. Benedict of Nursia and Pope Benedict XV. His papacy lasted until his historic resignation on February 28, 2013—the first in nearly 600 years—citing advanced age and declining health. As Pope Emeritus, he lived quietly in the Vatican until his death at 95.

 Accomplishments as Theologian and Pontiff

Benedict XVI's intellectual output was staggering: over 66 books, including classics like Introduction to Christianity (1968), which presented the faith accessibly amid modern doubts, and his trilogy Jesus of Nazareth (2007–2012), a deeply personal reflection on Christ's life that bridged scholarship and devotion.

As pope, he issued three encyclicals forming a trilogy on the theological virtues: Deus Caritas Est (God Is Love, 2005), Spe Salvi (Saved in Hope, 2007), and Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth, 2009), emphasizing love as the heart of Christian ethics and critiquing unchecked capitalism. He promoted greater use of the Traditional Latin Mass via Summorum Pontificum (2007), fostered interreligious dialogue (including with Muslims and Jews), and advanced ecumenism while upholding doctrine.

His leadership saw the beatification of hundreds and the canonization of dozens of saints, including his predecessor John Paul II's process. Benedict confronted the clergy sexual abuse crisis head-on, issuing apologies and reforms, though challenges persisted.

 Stern Adherence to the Faith and Church Teachings

What distinguished Benedict was his unyielding fidelity to Catholic tradition amid cultural shifts. Initially progressive at Vatican II, he became a staunch defender against what he viewed as misinterpretations that diluted doctrine. As head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he addressed issues like liberation theology, reaffirming teachings on contraception, homosexuality, women's ordination, and the uniqueness of Christ for salvation.

He condemned relativism as a "dictatorship" that erodes truth, insisting faith and reason are harmonious. His theology emphasized continuity with tradition, viewing Vatican II not as rupture but renewal. Benedict's conservatism stemmed from conviction: the Church's teachings, rooted in Scripture and Tradition, offer liberation through truth, not conformity to worldly trends.

 A Lasting Legacy

Pope Benedict XVI was a humble servant whose brilliance illuminated the faith for millions. In retirement, he prayed and wrote, loyally supporting his successor, Pope Francis. His life reminds us that true theology serves the encounter with Christ, not ideology.

Rest in peace, dear Benedict—humble worker in the Lord's vineyard.

 References

- Wikipedia: Pope Benedict XVI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Benedict_XVI)

- Britannica: Benedict XVI Biography (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Benedict-XVI)

- Vatican Official Biography (https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/biography/documents/hf_ben-xvi_bio_20050419_short-biography-old.html)

- Theology of Pope Benedict XVI (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology_of_Pope_Benedict_XVI)

- EWTN: Benedict XVI Biography (https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/benedict-xvi-biography-24555)

What was the Star of Bethlehem?

 

The Star of Bethlehem: A Multidisciplinary Inquiry into Its Nature and Significance

 Introduction

The Star of Bethlehem, described exclusively in the Gospel of Matthew (2:1-12), has captivated scholars, theologians, astronomers, and historians for centuries. This celestial phenomenon is said to have appeared in the east, signaling the birth of the "King of the Jews," prompting Magi (wise men or astrologers from the East) to travel to Jerusalem and ultimately to Bethlehem, where it "stood over" the location of the child Jesus. The account raises profound questions: Was this a historical astronomical event, a theological symbol, a miraculous sign, or a combination thereof?

This essay examines the Star through biblical exegesis, historical astronomical records, scientific theories, and modern commentaries from both scientists and theologians. It draws on ancient sources, such as Chinese and Korean observations, as well as contemporary analyses. While no single explanation achieves universal consensus, the inquiry reveals the interplay between faith, reason, and empirical observation.

 Biblical Description and Theological Interpretations

The narrative in Matthew 2 portrays the Star as a dynamic entity: it rises in the east, prompts the Magi's journey, disappears (as they inquire in Jerusalem), reappears to guide them southward to Bethlehem, and "comes to rest" over the child's location. The Greek term aster can denote a star, planet, comet, or luminous body, allowing interpretive flexibility.

Theologically, the Star fulfills Old Testament prophecies, notably Numbers 24:17 ("A star shall come out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel"), often seen as messianic. Early Church Fathers like Origen linked it to comets or miraculous signs. In Eastern Orthodox tradition, it symbolizes divine revelation, possibly an angelic manifestation or pedagogical miracle, independent of natural phenomena.

Modern theologians emphasize its symbolic role. It represents God's guidance to Gentiles, revealing Jesus as universal Savior. Many view Matthew's account as theological narrative rather than strict chronology, contrasting with Luke's Gospel (which omits the Star and Magi). The Star underscores themes of divine intervention amid political turmoil under Herod.

In this view, the Star transcends astronomy, serving as a sign of Christ's light piercing darkness, hope for humanity, and fulfillment of prophecy.

 Historical Astronomical Records

Ancient records, particularly from China and Korea, document unusual celestial events around the likely period of Jesus' birth (circa 7-4 BC, based on Herod's reign ending in 4 BC).

Chinese annals note a "broom star" (comet) in spring 5 BC, visible for over 70 days. Another possible nova or comet appears in 4 BC. Korean records corroborate some sightings.

No Western records (Roman or Jewish) mention a spectacular event, suggesting it was not globally conspicuous or was interpreted differently. Babylonian astrologers, potential forebears of the Magi, tracked planetary motions but left no explicit reference to a "Star" tied to Judea.

These records provide candidates for natural explanations but highlight gaps: events were noted in the Far East but not nearer to Judea.

 Scientific Theories: Conjunctions, Comets, Novae, and Supernovae

Astronomers have proposed natural phenomena aligning with the timeframe and description.

 Planetary Conjunctions

Johannes Kepler (1614) first linked the Star to a triple conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in 7 BC in Pisces (astrologically associated with Judea). Jupiter symbolized kingship; Saturn, protection or fate. The planets aligned closely three times (May, October, December 7 BC), appearing as a bright "star."

Later theories include a Jupiter-Venus conjunction in 3-2 BC (extremely bright, June 17, 2 BC) or Jupiter-Regulus alignments. Michael Molnar argues for a 6 BC Jupiter-Moon occultation in Aries, signifying a Jewish king per ancient astrology.

Conjunctions explain a bright, rising "star" in the east but struggle with the "standing over" motion, as planets move steadily.

 Comet Hypothesis

Comets fit the "newly appeared" and moving description. Colin Humphreys and others identify the 5 BC Chinese comet, visible 70+ days, initially in the east.

Recent research (Mark Matney, 2025) models this comet's orbit, suggesting it passed close to Earth in June 5 BC, appearing to "stop" overhead Bethlehem due to temporary geosynchronous-like motion (countering Earth's rotation). It could have been daylight-visible, guiding the short Jerusalem-Bethlehem leg.

Comets were often omens, but a bright one might signal a royal birth.

 Nova or Supernova

A nova (sudden stellar brightening) or supernova (explosive stellar death) creates a "new star." Chinese records note possible novae in 5-4 BC.

Kepler favored a nova post-conjunction. Supernovae are rare and bright but leave remnants (none match the date). They appear fixed, not moving or "standing over" a spot.

No theory perfectly matches Matthew's dynamic description, leading some astronomers to conclude no single natural event suffices.

 Recent Commentaries from Scientists and Theologians

Scientific commentaries (2010-2025) revive the comet theory. Matney's work demonstrates a comet could "stop," resolving a key puzzle. Earlier, Colin Nicholl promoted a great comet.

Astronomers like David Weintraub emphasize ancient astrology: the Magi interpreted events portentously, not modern scientifically.

Theologically, the Star symbolizes revelation. Many, including Eastern Orthodox scholars, see it as miraculous—possibly the Shekinah glory or angelic light—guiding seekers.

Others integrate science and faith: a natural event divinely timed as a sign.

 Conclusion

The Star of Bethlehem defies singular explanation, embodying the tension between empirical inquiry and transcendent meaning. Astronomical candidates—conjunctions in 7-6 BC, the 5 BC comet—offer plausible historical bases, enriched by recent models showing cometary "stopping." Yet the narrative's miraculous elements suggest theological primacy: a divine sign heralding the Messiah to the world.

Ultimately, the Star invites wonder, bridging heaven and earth, science and faith, in the mystery of the Incarnation.

 Sources

- Bible: Gospel of Matthew 2:1-12 (various translations, e.g., NIV, ESV).

- Pope Benedict XVI. Jesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narratives. 2012.

- Wikipedia. "Star of Bethlehem." (Accessed via search results, 2025).

- Astronomy.com. "The Star of Bethlehem: Can science explain what it really was?" 2024.

- Scientific American. "Was the 'Star of Bethlehem' Really a Comet?" 2025.

- Matney, Mark. "The star that stopped: The Star of Bethlehem & the comet of 5 BCE." Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 2025.

- National Geographic. "Is there historical evidence for the Star of Bethlehem?" 2025.

- Humphreys, Colin. "The Star of Bethlehem—a Comet in 5 BC—and the Date of the Birth of Christ." 1991.

- Molnar, Michael R. The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi. 1999.

- Nicholl, Colin R. The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem. 2015.

- Various Chinese and Korean astronomical records (as cited in secondary sources).

NASA scientist claims Star of Bethlehem was real, and China has proof. However, it wasn't a star, but...

A researcher claims the Star of Bethlehem has a real-world explanation

Refutation Rick Brennan JR Protestant Apologetic on the Biblical Canon

Refutation of the Presented Protestant Apologetic on the Biblical Canon

The article (https://rickbrennanjr.substack.com/p/the-canon-of-scripture) provided offers a detailed Protestant perspective on the biblical canon, emphasizing a 66-book Bible, the rejection of the deuterocanonical books (often called the Apocrypha by Protestants), a "bottom-up" organic recognition process guided by the Holy Spirit, and the supremacy of sola scriptura. It portrays the early Church as gradually acknowledging an already self-evident canon, with councils merely ratifying what was obvious, and contrasts this with Roman Catholic views on Church authority, Tradition, and the inclusion of seven additional Old Testament books.

This narrative, while internally coherent within a Reformed framework, contains significant historical inaccuracies, selective interpretations, and theological overreach. Below is a structured refutation addressing the core claims, drawing on historical evidence from early Church sources, councils, and scholarly consensus.

 1. The Claim of a Fixed Jewish Canon in the First Century, Excluding the Deuterocanonicals

The text asserts that by the time of Christ, the Jewish canon was closed at 39 books (equivalent to the Protestant Old Testament), fixed around 435 BC after Malachi, and that Jesus and the apostles affirmed only these, never citing the deuterocanonicals as Scripture.

This is historically unsubstantiated. Scholarly consensus holds that the Jewish canon was not definitively fixed until the second century AD or later. There was no single, universally agreed-upon Jewish canon in the first century; different Jewish communities (Palestinian Pharisees, Hellenistic Diaspora Jews, Essenes at Qumran) used varying collections. The Pharisees' tradition, which became dominant rabbinic Judaism post-70 AD, favored a narrower canon, but even this was debated into the second-third centuries (e.g., disputes over Esther, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes).

Evidence:

- Fragments of deuterocanonical books (Tobit in Aramaic/Hebrew, Sirach in Hebrew) were found at Qumran and Masada, indicating acceptance in some Jewish circles.

- The Septuagint (LXX), widely used by Hellenistic Jews and quoted extensively in the New Testament (over 300 times, often diverging from the Hebrew Masoretic Text), included the deuterocanonicals.

- No pre-Christian Jewish source lists a fixed 22/24/39-book canon excluding them. Josephus (late first century) mentions 22 books but does not enumerate them precisely matching the Protestant canon.

- Jesus references the Scriptures broadly (Luke 24:44: Law, Prophets, Psalms) without excluding deuterocanonicals; New Testament allusions (e.g., Hebrews 11:35-36 to 2 Maccabees 7; Romans 1:18-32 to Wisdom 13-14) suggest familiarity.

The idea of a "Council of Jamnia" (c. 90 AD) closing the canon is a 19th-century myth; it was a rabbinic academy discussing disputed books like Ecclesiastes, not issuing a binding canon.

Jesus and the apostles used the LXX, which included these books, reflecting the broader canon of many first-century Jews.

 2. The Process of Canon Formation: "Recognition" vs. Church Authority

The text describes canonization as a "bottom-up" organic recognition of inherently authoritative books, with councils (Hippo 393, Carthage 397) merely confirming what the undivided Church already acknowledged under the Spirit's guidance. It denies that councils "created" or "conferred" authority, contrasting this with alleged Roman Catholic claims.

This minimizes the Church's role. While the canon emerged gradually through usage, disputes persisted, requiring authoritative discernment:

- The Muratorian Fragment (c. 170-200 AD) includes most NT books but excludes Hebrews, James, 1-2 Peter, and 3 John; it accepts the Apocalypse of Peter and Wisdom of Solomon.

- Eusebius (c. 324 AD) categorizes books as accepted, disputed (including Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2-3 John, Jude, Revelation), and spurious.

- Athanasius' 39th Festal Letter (367 AD) is the first list matching the 27 NT books exactly, but he places Baruch with Jeremiah and excludes Esther from the canon while listing deuterocanonicals as "readable."

- Regional variations continued; Revelation was disputed in the East longer.

Councils like Hippo and Carthage (influenced by Augustine) explicitly listed and affirmed the canon, including deuterocanonicals, stating these alone should be read as divine Scripture in church. These were local but influential; later councils (Florence 1442, Trent 1546) reaffirmed them ecumenically for Catholics.

The process involved Church discernment, not pure "recognition" of self-evident books. Disputed books (antilegomena) required resolution through ecclesiastical authority guided by the Spirit.

 

3. The Deuterocanonical Books: Early Rejection vs. Acceptance

The text claims Jesus/apostles never cited deuterocanonicals as Scripture, early fathers preferred the Hebrew canon, and Reformers rightly excluded them for lacking apostolic origin, containing errors, and not being quoted by Christ/NT.

Early Christianity predominantly accepted deuterocanonicals:

- Most pre-Nicene codices (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus) include them.

- Fathers like Clement of Rome, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyprian, and Augustine quoted them as Scripture.

- Councils of Rome (382), Hippo (393), Carthage (397, 419) included them in the OT canon.

- Jerome resisted but deferred to Church judgment, including them in the Vulgate.

NT allusions are numerous (e.g., Matt 7:12 to Sirach 31:15; Heb 1:3 to Wisdom 7:26). No direct quotes do not prove rejection; many protocanonical books (e.g., Ruth, Ezra) are not quoted either.

"Errors" claims are subjective; alleged inconsistencies exist in protocanonicals too. Reformers removed them partly because they supported doctrines like purgatory/prayers for the dead (2 Macc 12:38-46), contradicting emerging Protestant theology.

Trent (1546) did not "add" books but reaffirmed longstanding Church usage against Protestant removal.

 4. Authority: Scripture Self-Authenticating vs. Church/Tradition

The text promotes a self-authenticating canon (inner Spirit testimony + divine qualities), rejecting Church magisterium as conferring authority, and critiques Catholic "living tradition" as ongoing revelation eclipsing Scripture sufficiency.

This faces circularity: How do we know which books are self-authenticating without external criteria? Disputed books required Church resolution.

Catholic teaching (Dei Verbum, CCC 80-100): Scripture and Tradition form one deposit of revelation; Magisterium interprets authentically but serves, not rules over, the Word. Public revelation ended with apostles; "living tradition" transmits unchanging truth.

Examples like Mary's Assumption (1950) draw from apostolic deposit, not new revelation.

Protestant self-authentication leads to subjectivity; historical disputes show no unanimous "self-evident" canon without Church guidance.

 5. Modern Implications and "Incompatible Religions"

The text equates liberal denial of Scripture with Catholic Tradition/Magisterium, calling the latter "sola ecclesia" obscuring the gospel.

This is polemical overstatement. Catholicism affirms Scripture's inspiration/sufficiency (for salvation, with Tradition) but not sola scriptura, which lacks biblical warrant and led to interpretive fragmentation.

Both traditions uphold core gospel truths; differences on authority do not make them "incompatible religions."

The presented view idealizes a historically unattested first-century closed canon, downplays Church authority in resolving disputes, and misrepresents Catholic teaching on revelation. The 73-book canon reflects early Christian usage; Protestant removal was a 16th-century innovation driven by doctrinal needs.

Christians should approach these differences charitably, recognizing shared faith in Christ while honestly engaging history.

No one can dispute the role of the Catholic Church in the formation of the Bible.  This is why Protestants can never answer the following questions:

• Where in the Bible's inspired texts can we find the canon of inspired books, and in what order should they be placed?
• Where in the Bible's inspired texts does it say who wrote the Gospels and what Paul wrote?
• Where in the Bible's inspired texts does it refer to the Bible as the "Word of God?"
• Where in the Bible does it call itself the "Bible?"
• Where in the Bible's inspired texts does it say "Sola Scriptura?"
• If the Bible was already compiled before the Council of Carthage, why don't we see direct quotes and citations of the Gospels in New Testament books?
• Who had the authority to decide the Canon of Scripture before the Bible was completed?

It is no wonder why Rick Brennan blocked our Sacerdotus account from posting on his Substack. What is he afraid of?

 Sources

1. Edmon L. Gallagher and John D. Meade, The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity: Texts and Analysis (Oxford University Press, 2017).

2. Bruce M. Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Clarendon Press, 1987).

3. F.F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture (InterVarsity Press, 1988).

4. J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines (HarperOne, 1978).

5. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed., 1997), paragraphs 74-100.

6. Vatican II, Dei Verbum (1965).

7. Lee Martin McDonald, The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority (Hendrickson, 2007).

8. David Brakke (ed.), The Canon Debate (Hendrickson, 2002).

9. Michael J. Kruger, Canon Revisited (Crossway, 2012) – for Protestant perspective and critique.

10. Gary Michuta, Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger (Grotto Press, 2017) – for Catholic perspective.

11. Josephus, Against Apion 1.37-43.

12. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.25, 6.14.

13. Athanasius, 39th Festal Letter (367 AD).

14. Council of Trent, Session 4 (1546), Decree on Canonical Scriptures.

15. Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397), Canon 36/24.

16. Jerome, Prologue to Kings (Vulgate).

17. Augustine, On Christian Doctrine 2.8.

18. Pontifical Biblical Commission, "The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures" (2001).

19. R.T. Beckwith, The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church (Eerdmans, 1985).

20. Britannica and Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church entries on "Biblical Canon" and "Jamnia."

The Holy Family: Model For Us All

Reflection on the Catholic Readings for the Feast of the Holy Family  

December 28, 2025 (Year A)

On this Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, the Church invites us to contemplate the domestic life of the Savior and to hold up His family as the model for our own. The readings speak profoundly to the joys, duties, and trials of family life, reminding us that holiness is forged not in perfection but in fidelity, mutual respect, forgiveness, and trust in God's providence.

 First Reading: Sirach 3:2-6, 12-14

The Book of Sirach offers timeless wisdom on honoring parents. God establishes parental authority as a reflection of divine order, and those who honor father and mother reap blessings: atonement for sins, answered prayers, and long life. Especially poignant is the call to care for aging parents with kindness, even when frailty tests patience: "My son, take care of your father when he is old... even if his mind fail, be considerate of him."

This reading challenges us to see family obligations not as burdens but as paths to holiness. In a culture that often marginalizes the elderly, Sirach reminds us that reverence for parents mirrors reverence for God Himself.

 Responsorial Psalm: Psalm 128:1-5

"Blessed are those who fear the Lord and walk in his ways." The psalm paints a beautiful image of family blessed by God: fruitful labor, a faithful spouse "like a fruitful vine," and children "like olive plants" around the table. This domestic prosperity flows from reverence for the Lord. Family thrives when rooted in faith.

 Second Reading: Colossians 3:12-21 (or shorter 3:12-17)

St. Paul urges us to "put on" the virtues of Christ: compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, patience, and above all, love, which "binds everything together in perfect harmony." Forgiveness is central—"as the Lord has forgiven you, so you must forgive." He addresses family roles with mutual submission in Christ: wives and husbands in love, children in obedience, fathers in gentle guidance.

Though some verses reflect the cultural context of the time, the heart of Paul's message is reciprocal love and peace rooted in Christ. Family becomes a "domestic church" when its members clothe themselves in these virtues.

 Gospel: Matthew 2:13-15, 19-23

The Gospel presents the Holy Family not in serene Nazareth but in crisis: fleeing as refugees into Egypt to escape Herod's murderous rage. An angel warns Joseph in a dream, and he obeys immediately—"he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt." Later, guided again by dreams, they return and settle in Nazareth.

This is no idealized portrait. The Holy Family faces danger, exile, uncertainty, and loss (echoing the slaughter of the Holy Innocents). Yet their response is swift obedience and trust. Joseph protects; Mary ponders and accompanies; the Child Jesus, though divine, submits to human vulnerability. Their holiness shines precisely in trial.

 A Unified Message for Today

Taken together, these readings reveal that family life is the ordinary crucible where extraordinary holiness is formed. Honor and care across generations (Sirach), virtues of Christ lived daily (Colossians), and radical trust in God's guidance amid hardship (Matthew) form the blueprint.

The Holy Family was not exempt from suffering—poverty, displacement, threats—yet they became holy through love, obedience, and fidelity. In our own families, marked by busyness, conflicts, illnesses, or separations, we are called to imitate them: to forgive quickly, to protect the vulnerable, to listen for God's voice in the night, and to make our homes places where Christ dwells.

 

Caution Against Politicizing the Holy Family

While the Gospel account of the Flight into Egypt powerfully illustrates the vulnerability of the Holy Family and God's providential care amid peril, it is important to resist efforts to instrumentalize this sacred event for contemporary political debates on immigration and deportation.

Some advocates claim that Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were "refugees," "migrants," or even "illegal immigrants," directly equating their journey with modern undocumented border crossings. This analogy often falls short historically and theologically.

At the time of Christ's birth (around 6–4 BC), both Judea (under Herod the Great, a Roman client king) and Egypt were provinces within the same Roman Empire. Egypt had become a Roman province in 30 BC after Octavian's defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra. Travel between Judea and Egypt involved moving from one administrative region to another—comparable today to crossing from one U.S. state to another, such as New York to Pennsylvania—rather than crossing an international border into a foreign sovereign nation.

There were no modern immigration controls, passports, or visa requirements as we understand them. Roman citizens and subjects moved relatively freely within the Empire's provinces, especially along well-established routes like the Via Maris coastal road connecting Judea to Egypt. The Holy Family's flight escaped Herod's local jurisdiction (he ruled only Judea, Samaria, and Idumea), but they remained under Roman imperial authority. Thus, they did not enter Egypt "illegally" or as undocumented immigrants violating a foreign nation's laws.

Theologically, Matthew presents this event as fulfillment of prophecy ("Out of Egypt I called my son," Hos 11:1) and a parallel to Israel's exodus, emphasizing divine protection rather than a commentary on migration policy. While the Holy Family certainly experienced displacement and hardship—fleeing tyranny and becoming exiles in a foreign land—their situation aligns more closely with internal displacement or seeking safety within a shared political entity than with modern international refugee status or unauthorized border crossing.

Catholic teaching, including Pope Pius XII's Exsul Familia Nazarethana (1952), describes the Holy Family as the "archetype of every refugee family," highlighting their vulnerability to inspire compassion for those fleeing persecution today. The Church upholds the dignity of migrants, the obligation of nations to welcome those in grave need (to the extent possible), and the right of sovereign states to regulate borders. However, it does not equate the Holy Family's unique, divinely guided journey with endorsement of unrestricted immigration or dismissal of lawful borders.

In charity, we must care for the stranger (Mt 25:35) and address root causes of forced migration, but without distorting Scripture or history to advance partisan agendas. The Feast of the Holy Family invites us to imitate their trust in God, mutual love, and obedience—not to weaponize their story in cultural wars.

May we honor them by building families rooted in faith, welcoming the vulnerable with prudence and mercy, and praying for just solutions to the complexities of human mobility. 

Holy Family, pray for us.

As we close the Christmas season, may the Holy Family intercede for our families. May we welcome the Christ Child not only into mangers of sentiment but into the real, messy, beautiful reality of our daily lives together.

Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph—pray for us.

Urgent plea for help!  We need donations now.  Please help us. Donate to our gofundme or cashapp. This work is crucial for so many right now. Please consider donating or sharing to help keep this ministry running. Every little bit helps in a time when faith is needed most. Thank you!  

https://www.gofundme.com/f/sacerdotus-evangelization-work

Pope Leo XIV's Urbi Et Orbi - His First

Pope Leo XIV's First Christmas Urbi et Orbi Message: A Call for Peace and Shared Responsibility

On December 25, 2025, Pope Leo XIV delivered his first Christmas "Urbi et Orbi" blessing from the central loggia of St. Peter's Basilica. As the first American pope, elected in May 2025 following the death of Pope Francis, Leo XIV brought a message deeply rooted in the Nativity story while addressing the world's ongoing conflicts and sufferings. His address emphasized that true peace is both a divine gift and a human responsibility, urging dialogue, justice, and solidarity in the face of war, poverty, and displacement.

The Pope framed his reflection around the proclamation that Christ is our peace, born in humility to identify with the marginalized. He highlighted specific crises, including the situations in Gaza, Yemen, Ukraine, Syria, and forgotten conflicts in Africa, while calling for an end to indifference toward migrants and the exploited. Notably, he quoted the Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai's "Wildpeace" to contrast superficial ceasefires with a deeper, unexpected peace that blooms like wildflowers after exhaustion.

This message continues the tradition of papal Christmas addresses as a global appeal for peace, blending spiritual hope with concrete calls to action.

 Full Text of Pope Leo XIV's Urbi et Orbi Message (Christmas 2025)

Dear brothers and sisters,

“Let us all rejoice in the Lord, for our Savior has been born in the world. Today, true peace has come down to us from heaven” (Entrance Antiphon, Christmas Mass during the Night).

Thus sings the liturgy on Christmas night, and the announcement of Bethlehem resounds in the Church: the Child born of the Virgin Mary is Christ the Lord, sent by the Father to save us from sin and death. Indeed, he is our peace; he has conquered hatred and enmity through God’s merciful love. For this reason, “the Lord’s birth is the birth of peace” (Saint Leo the Great, Sermon 26).

Jesus was born in a stable because there was no room for him in the inn. As soon as he was born, his mother Mary “wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger” (cf. Lk 2:7). The Son of God, through whom all things were created, was not welcomed, and a poor manger for animals was his crib. The eternal Word of the Father whom the heavens cannot contain chose to come into the world in this way.

Out of love, he accepted poverty and rejection, identifying himself with those who are discarded and excluded. Without a heart freed from sin, a heart that has been forgiven, we cannot be men and women of peace or builders of peace.

In becoming man, Jesus took upon himself our fragility, identifying with each one of us: with those who have nothing left and have lost everything, like the inhabitants of Gaza; with those who are prey to hunger and poverty, like the Yemeni people; with those who are fleeing their homeland to seek a future elsewhere, like the many refugees and migrants who cross the Mediterranean or traverse the American continent.

With those who have lost their jobs and those seeking employment, like so many young people struggling to find work; with those who are exploited, like countless underpaid workers; with those in prison, often living in inhumane conditions.

To Him, we implore justice, peace, and stability for Lebanon, Palestine, Israel, and Syria, trusting in these divine words: “The work of justice will be peace, and the fruit of justice, tranquility and security forever.”

Let us pray especially for the afflicted Ukrainian people, that the roar of arms may cease and that the parties involved, with the support of the international community, find the courage to engage in sincere, direct, and respectful dialogue.

From the Child of Bethlehem, we implore peace and consolation for the victims of all current wars in the world, especially those that are forgotten, and for those who suffer due to injustice, political instability, religious persecution, and terrorism — thinking in particular of Sudan, South Sudan, Mali, Burkina Faso, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Responsibility is the sure way to peace.

[Here the Pope quoted from Yehuda Amichai's poem "Wildpeace":]

Not the peace of a cease-fire,  

not even the vision of the wolf and the lamb,  

but rather  

the peace that lets the wildflowers grow  

without being trampled,  

the peace without speeches,  

the peace that comes when people are exhausted  

from fighting and simply want to live.

To all of you, I offer heartfelt good wishes for a peaceful and holy Christmas!

Merry Christmas! May the peace of Christ reign in your hearts and in your families.

(The Pope then extended Christmas greetings in multiple languages, including Italian, French, English, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, Arabic, Chinese, and Latin.)

This poignant message reminds us that the joy of Christmas is inseparable from our commitment to justice and peace in a wounded world. As Pope Leo XIV begins his pontificate's first full year, his words invite believers and people of goodwill everywhere to embrace shared responsibility for building a more fraternal society.

Refuting John MacArthur's Lies

A Comprehensive Refutation of John MacArthur's Criticisms of Catholicism: Biblical and Patristic Evidence

John MacArthur, pastor of Grace Community Church and founder of Grace to You ministry, has been one of the most vocal Protestant critics of the Catholic Church. Over decades of sermons, books, and articles, he has described Roman Catholicism as an "apostate, corrupt, heretical, false Christianity" and "a front for the kingdom of Satan." He has called it a "false religion" that preaches "another gospel," denies justification by faith alone, and binds people in "darkness and guilt." MacArthur views Catholic doctrines on authority, sacraments, Mary, purgatory, and salvation as unbiblical inventions that obscure the true gospel.

This extended essay systematically examines MacArthur's primary objections, refuting them with Scripture in its full context and the unanimous witness of the early Church Fathers. Catholic teaching aligns with the apostolic faith handed down from the first centuries. MacArthur's positions often rely on selective exegesis, ignoring passages and historical evidence that contradict his Reformed interpretations. The Catholic Church preserves the biblical faith of the apostles and their successors.

 1. Sola Scriptura: Scripture Alone as the Sole Infallible Authority?

MacArthur insists that sola scriptura—Scripture as the sole infallible rule of faith—is the foundation of true Christianity. He argues that Catholic reliance on Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium elevates human authority above God's Word, leading to errors like transubstantiation and purgatory.

The Bible itself does not teach sola scriptura. No verse claims Scripture is the only infallible source of revelation. Instead, it affirms apostolic Tradition as equally binding.

Paul commands: "Stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter" (2 Thessalonians 2:15). He instructs Timothy: "What you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also" (2 Timothy 2:2). This oral transmission continued alongside written Scripture.

Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for elevating human traditions above God's Word (Mark 7:8-13), but He affirms divine Tradition: "He who hears you hears me" (Luke 10:16). The Church is "the pillar and bulwark of the truth" (1 Timothy 3:15), tasked with interpreting and guarding revelation (Matthew 18:17).

The early Fathers rejected private interpretation in favor of apostolic Tradition preserved by the Church.

Ignatius of Antioch (c. 110 AD), disciple of John: "Let no one do anything connected with the Church without the bishop... Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be; as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church" (Smyrnaeans 8).

Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 180 AD): Heretics twist Scripture, but "the tradition of the apostles... has been made known throughout the whole world... preserved by means of the successions of presbyters in the churches" (Against Heresies 3:3:1-3). He lists bishops in succession to prove orthodoxy.

Tertullian (c. 200 AD): Challenge heretics to "produce the original records of their churches; let them unfold the roll of their bishops, running down in due succession from the beginning" (Prescription Against Heretics 32).

Sola scriptura arose in the 16th century. The early Church held Scripture and Tradition as one deposit of faith, interpreted by the Magisterium. MacArthur's view lacks biblical and historical support.

 2. Sola Fide: Justification by Faith Alone?

MacArthur teaches sola fide: justification as a one-time forensic declaration of righteousness by imputed Christ's merit, apart from works. He accuses Catholicism of "works-righteousness," claiming it teaches salvation by sacraments and merit, blending grace with human effort.

Scripture presents justification as transformative, involving faith infused with charity, perfected by works.

James explicitly states: "A man is justified by works and not by faith alone" (James 2:24)—the only biblical use of "faith alone," denying it. Abraham was "justified by works" when offering Isaac (James 2:21), after earlier faith (Genesis 15). Rahab similarly (James 2:25). Faith without works is dead (James 2:17, 26).

Paul's "justified by faith apart from works" (Romans 3:28; Galatians 2:16) refers to "works of the law"—Mosaic ceremonies like circumcision—not moral works in grace (Romans 2:6-13: God judges by deeds; Galatians 5:6: faith working through love).

Salvation is by grace (Ephesians 2:8-9), but for good works (v. 10). We must "work out your salvation with fear and trembling" (Philippians 2:12). Final judgment is by works (Matthew 25:31-46; Revelation 20:12-13).

Catholics affirm grace alone initiates and sustains justification, but faith cooperates in love (1 Corinthians 13:2, 13).

Fathers taught cooperative grace.

Clement of Rome (c. 80 AD): "We are not justified by ourselves... but by faith," yet stresses obedience (1 Clement 32).

Justin Martyr (c. 150 AD): God justifies by faith and works.

Augustine: "Faith without works is of no avail" (On Faith and Works).

MacArthur's sola fide contradicts James and the biblical synergy of grace, faith, and love.

 3. The Papacy and Apostolic Succession

MacArthur rejects the papacy as unbiblical usurpation, viewing Peter's "primacy" as mere prominence, not jurisdictional authority passed to successors.

Scripture establishes Peter's unique role.

Jesus renames Simon "Peter" (rock) and builds His Church on him, giving keys to the kingdom—binding/loosing authority (Matthew 16:18-19; cf. Isaiah 22:22). Peter alone receives this.

Jesus prays for Peter to strengthen brethren (Luke 22:31-32) and commands: "Feed my sheep" (John 21:15-17).

Peter leads in Acts: first Pentecost preacher (Acts 2), decides on Gentiles (Acts 15), speaks first (Acts 1:15).

Fathers affirm Roman primacy and succession.

Clement of Rome (c. 80 AD) intervenes in Corinth, asserting authority.

Ignatius: Unity under bishops.

Irenaeus: "With [Rome] all churches must agree because of its superior origin" (Against Heresies 3:3:2). Lists Roman bishops back to Peter/Paul.

Tertullian acknowledges Peter's ordination of Clement.

By 200s, popes exercised jurisdiction (Victor on Easter; Stephen on baptism).

The papacy is biblical succession preserving unity.

 4. The Eucharist: Real Presence and Sacrifice

MacArthur views the Eucharist as symbolic memorial, accusing Catholics of idolatry and "re-sacrificing" Christ.

Jesus teaches literal presence: "My flesh is food indeed... Unless you eat the flesh... no life in you" (John 6:53-56). Disciples left over "hard saying" (v. 60), but Jesus affirmed.

At Last Supper: "This is my body... blood" (Matthew 26:26-28; 1 Corinthians 11:23-25).

Paul: Unworthy reception guilts "body and blood," profaning (1 Corinthians 11:27-29).

Fathers unanimously affirm Real Presence.

Ignatius: "Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior" (Smyrnaeans 7:1). Heretics abstain because they deny it.

Justin Martyr: "Not common bread... but flesh and blood" (First Apology 66).

Irenaeus: Bread "becomes the Eucharist, the body of Christ" (Against Heresies 5:2).

The Mass re-presents Christ's one sacrifice (Hebrews 10:10), not repeats it.

MacArthur's symbolism contradicts Scripture and early consensus.

 5. Veneration of Mary and Saints

MacArthur calls Marian devotion "Mariolatry," idolatry diverting from Christ.

Catholics honor (dulia) Mary as Mother of God (Theotokos, Ephesus 431).

Scripture: "Hail, full of grace" (Luke 1:28); "Blessed among women" (1:42); "All generations will call me blessed" (1:48).

Intercession: Saints in heaven pray (Revelation 5:8). Early sub tuum praesidium prayer (c. 250 AD).

Fathers: Irenaeus, Mary as new Eve.

Honor to Mary magnifies God (Luke 1:46-49).

 6. Purgatory: Purification After Death

MacArthur dismisses purgatory as invention, denying post-death purification.

Scripture implies it.

1 Corinthians 3:13-15: Works tested by fire; saved "as through fire."

Matthew 12:32: Sin against Spirit unforgiven "in this age or age to come"—implying forgivable sins after death.

Prayers for dead (2 Maccabees 12:42-46; Catholic canon).

Fathers: Tertullian offerings for dead; Augustine temporary punishments.

Purgatory is merciful purification for imperfect saints.

 Conclusion

MacArthur's critiques misrepresent Catholic teaching and ignore biblical contexts and patristic consensus. The Catholic Church embodies the faith "once for all delivered" (Jude 3). His views, rooted in 16th-century innovations, lack full scriptural and historical grounding.

 References

- Holy Bible (RSV-CE / Douay-Rheims)

- Catechism of the Catholic Church

- Ignatius of Antioch, Letters

- Justin Martyr, First Apology

- Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies

- Tertullian, Prescription Against Heresies; On Monogamy

- Clement of Rome, 1 Clement

- Augustine, Various Works

- J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines

- John MacArthur, Various Sermons and Articles (Grace to You)

A Reflection on Christmas: The Eternal Light Enters Time

A Reflection on Christmas: The Eternal Light Enters Time

On this Christmas Day, December 25, 2025, we celebrate the profound mystery at the heart of our faith: the birth of Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man. Christmas is not merely a cultural holiday or a season of lights, trees, and gifts; it is the commemoration of the Incarnation—the moment when the eternal Word became flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14). At its core, Christmas is about Jesus, nothing else. Gifts, family gatherings, and festive meals are beautiful expressions of joy, but they must never eclipse the central truth: God has entered human history to redeem us. As we reflect on the Catholic liturgy for this solemnity, the scriptural and historical calculation of December 25, and the unique wonder of the Incarnation, may we allow Jesus to be born anew in our hearts.

The Catholic Church celebrates Christmas with four distinct Masses—Vigil, Midnight (Mass During the Night), Dawn, and Day—each unveiling a facet of the Nativity mystery. These readings, drawn from the Lectionary, emphasize God's saving action breaking into the world.

The Vigil Mass, often celebrated on Christmas Eve, sets an tone of joyful anticipation. The first reading from Isaiah 62:1-5 proclaims God's vindication shining like the dawn, with Jerusalem as a bride adorned for her husband. The Gospel from Matthew 1:1-25 traces Jesus' genealogy, affirming Him as the fulfillment of David's line and the promised Messiah born of Mary. This Mass reminds us that Christmas fulfills centuries of prophecy.

The Midnight Mass, traditionally at the hour of Christ's birth, bursts with angelic proclamation. Isaiah 9:1-6 declares, "The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light... For a child is born to us, a son is given to us." Titus 2:11-14 speaks of God's grace appearing for our salvation, and Luke 2:1-14 narrates the humble birth in Bethlehem, with angels singing "Glory to God in the highest" (Luke 2:14). Here, the mystery unfolds in silence and poverty, yet heralded by heavenly hosts.

The Mass at Dawn continues the shepherds' story (Luke 2:15-20), as they hasten to the manger and spread the good news. Isaiah 62:11-12 calls Zion's savior near, and Titus 3:4-7 highlights God's kindness manifested in Christ, washing us in rebirth through the Holy Spirit.

Finally, the Mass During the Day offers the profound Prologue of John's Gospel (John 1:1-18): "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us." Paired with Isaiah 52:7-10 and Hebrews 1:1-6, it reveals the eternal Son as the radiance of God's glory, superior to angels, who became man to make us heirs of salvation. These readings collectively proclaim that Christmas is the dawn of redemption, where God speaks definitively through His Son (Hebrews 1:2).

Why do we celebrate this on December 25? The date is not arbitrary but rooted in scriptural events and early Church calculations, as depicted in the referenced image. The image illustrates a timeline based on the Gospel of Luke, showing the Annunciation to Elizabeth (conception of John the Baptist) on Tishri 15 (around September 25), followed by six months to the Annunciation to Mary on March 25 (conception of Jesus), and then nine months of pregnancy leading to birth on December 25. It cites Luke 1:13 (angel to Zechariah about John), Luke 1:26 (Annunciation to Mary in the sixth month of Elizabeth's pregnancy), and Luke 2:7 (birth of Jesus). At the bottom, it notes John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus.

This calculation draws from Luke's precise chronology. The angel Gabriel announces John's birth to Zechariah while he serves in the temple (Luke 1:5-25). Zechariah belongs to the priestly division of Abijah, which served around late September in the Jewish calendar. Elizabeth conceives shortly after, and in her sixth month (around March), Gabriel visits Mary: "Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son... And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her" (Luke 1:31, 36). Adding a standard nine-month human gestation places Jesus' birth in late December.

Early Church Fathers refined this. Hippolytus of Rome (c. 170-235 AD) in his Commentary on Daniel calculated Jesus' birth around December 25, linking it to the belief that great prophets die on the anniversary of their conception or birth—a Jewish tradition seen in texts like the Seder Olam Rabbah. Tertullian (c. 160-220 AD) noted Jesus' death on March 25 (Passover date in Roman reckoning), so conception on the same day, birth nine months later on December 25. Sextus Julius Africanus (c. 221 AD) tied it to the spring equinox (March 25) as creation's day, with Incarnation mirroring it. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD) affirmed this in his writings on the Trinity, seeing perfect symmetry in Christ's life. John Chrysostom (c. 349-407 AD) defended December 25 against pagan associations, emphasizing its biblical roots.

By the fourth century, December 25 was widely celebrated in the West, spreading universally. Contrary to myths, it was not adopted from pagan solstice festivals (like Sol Invictus, formalized later); evidence shows Christians chose it independently based on these calculations. As the image poignantly illustrates, this date honors the scriptural timeline where John's precedence (Luke 1:41-44) points to Christ's supremacy.

At the heart of Christmas is the Incarnation: God became human in Jesus Christ. "The Word became flesh" (John 1:14) is the unique miracle of Christianity. No other faith claims that the one true God—the eternal, infinite Creator—personally entered creation as a vulnerable baby, fully divine yet fully human. In Hinduism, avatars like Krishna are manifestations, but the supreme Brahman remains transcendent, not truly uniting divinity with humanity in one person. In Greek mythology, gods like Zeus take human form temporarily for whims, not redemption. Islam explicitly rejects incarnation as shirk (associating partners with God). Buddhism has no personal God becoming man. Christianity alone proclaims that God, out of boundless love, bridged the infinite gap: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son" (John 3:16).

This is no mere appearance; Jesus is truly God and truly man, two natures in one divine person (Council of Chalcedon, 451 AD). As Athanasius of Alexandria wrote in On the Incarnation (c. 318 AD): "He became what we are that He might make us what He is." God treats His human creatures as if they were God—elevating our nature through union with His. In the Incarnation, divinity stoops to humanity so humanity might rise to divinity (theosis). This is love unimaginable: the Immortal takes on mortality, the All-Powerful becomes weak, to redeem us from sin and death. "Though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that by his poverty you might become rich" (2 Corinthians 8:9).

Christmas traditions around the world reflect this joy in diverse cultural expressions, always pointing back to Christ. In Italy, many families observe the Feast of the Seven Fishes on Christmas Eve—a meatless meal of seafood dishes (like baccalà, calamari, and shrimp), rooted in ancient fasting traditions before the feast day. The "seven" may symbolize the sacraments, days of creation, or hills of Rome, but it celebrates abundance from the sea while awaiting the Bread of Life.

In Puerto Rico, Nochebuena (Christmas Eve) features pernil—a slow-roasted pork shoulder marinated in garlic, oregano, and adobo—served with arroz con gandules (rice with pigeon peas) and pasteles (plantain tamales). Families sing aguinaldos (carols) in parranda processions, visiting homes with music and food, culminating in Midnight Mass. In Mexico, posadas reenact Mary and Joseph's search for lodging, ending in piñatas and ponche. Poland shares oplatek wafers with prayers; the Philippines holds Simbang Gabi novena Masses; Germany enjoys Christkindl markets and Stollen cake. These customs—feasts, lights, songs—express gratitude for the Light of the World, but they are secondary. Christmas is about Jesus: His birth demands our adoration, not distraction.

As we exchange gifts, let us remember the greatest Gift: God Himself, wrapped in swaddling clothes. Family gatherings are precious, but the Holy Family—Jesus, Mary, and Joseph—models perfect union with God. Even the commercial trappings can remind us of generosity, but only if centered on Christ. In a world that often reduces Christmas to sentimentality, let us reclaim its truth: it is the feast of God's self-emptying love.

May Jesus, the Word made flesh, continue to be born in our hearts—not just today, but every day. As we gaze upon the manger, may we echo Mary's fiat: "Be it done unto me according to your word" (Luke 1:38). In Him, we are made new. Merry Christmas—may the peace of the Christ Child dwell in us always.

Christmas Eve Midnight Mass

A Reflection on Christmas Eve: Waiting in the Dark for the Light of the World

It is Christmas Eve, December 24, 2025. The night is deep and cold, the kind of darkness that settles into the bones, wrapping the world in silence. Outside, the wind whispers through bare trees, and the stars pierce the velvet sky like distant promises. In homes across the world, families gather around flickering lights—candles, fireplaces, strings of bulbs—chasing away the chill. Yet there is a profound beauty in this darkness, this cold night of waiting. It mirrors the human soul in anticipation, yearning for something greater, something divine. For on this eve, we await the birth of Jesus Christ, the Lord who enters the world not in triumph or splendor, but in vulnerability, in a stable, under a humble star.

The anticipation of Christmas Eve is unlike any other. Advent has built to this moment: weeks of preparation, of lighting candles on the wreath, of reflecting on prophecies and promises. Now, as the clock ticks toward midnight, the wait intensifies. Children fidget with excitement, unable to sleep; adults feel a quiet stirring, a mix of nostalgia and hope. This night evokes the long vigil of humanity itself—centuries of waiting for the Messiah, foretold by prophets, longed for in exile and suffering. In the cold, dark night, we remember that the world was once shrouded in spiritual gloom, a land of deep shadow, as the prophet Isaiah describes. But into that shadow comes a great light.

The birth of Jesus is the fulfillment of that ancient longing. God does not come as a conquering king with armies, but as a helpless infant, born to a young virgin in Bethlehem. The Incarnation—God becoming man—is the greatest mystery of our faith. In the piercing cold of that first Christmas night, Mary labored, Joseph stood watch, and the Word became flesh. The eternal Son of God, who existed before time, entered time and space, taking on our humanity to redeem it. This is the heart of Christmas: not gifts or feasts alone, but the profound truth that God loves us so much He became one of us. In the vulnerability of a newborn, wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid in a manger, we see divine humility. The Creator of the universe chooses poverty, obscurity, and rejection from the start—no room at the inn.

This dark, cold night of waiting reminds us that light is most appreciated in darkness. Just as shepherds kept watch over their flocks by night, we keep vigil tonight. The anticipation builds a sacred tension: the silence before the angels' song, the stillness before the cry of the infant Savior. In our modern world, filled with distractions and noise, Christmas Eve invites us to embrace the quiet, to sit in the dark and ponder the mystery. It is a night for reflection on our own lives—where do we feel the cold of loneliness, the darkness of doubt or sorrow? Into those places, Christ desires to be born anew.

 The History of Midnight Mass

One of the most cherished traditions that captures this vigil is the Midnight Mass, officially known in the Roman Missal as the Mass During the Night. This celebration has ancient roots, tracing back to the early centuries of the Church. The earliest recorded account comes from the pilgrim Egeria, a woman from Galicia who journeyed to the Holy Land around 381-384 AD. In her travel diary, she describes how Christians in Jerusalem honored the Nativity with a midnight vigil in Bethlehem, followed by a torchlight procession to the Church of the Resurrection in Jerusalem, arriving at dawn. This practice symbolized the light of Christ piercing the darkness.

By the fifth century, the custom spread to Rome. Pope Sixtus III (432-440 AD), inspired by the Jerusalem tradition and the longstanding belief that Jesus was born at midnight, introduced the celebration of Mass at midnight in a grotto-like chapel he built beneath the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore. This chapel, modeled after the Bethlehem cave, housed a relic of the manger, making it a fitting place to commemorate the birth. The midnight hour was chosen deliberately: it evoked the moment when darkness gives way to light, sin to salvation, and death to life.

Over time, the Roman Church developed three distinct Masses for Christmas—midnight, dawn, and day—each emphasizing a different aspect of the mystery. The Midnight Mass, sometimes called the "Angel's Mass," focuses on the announcement to the shepherds and the glory of the heavenly host. It became a widespread tradition, spreading eastward and westward. In some cultures, like the Philippines and Latin America, it evolved into the "Misa de Gallo" or "Rooster's Mass," a series of dawn Masses leading to Christmas. In Europe, it was marked by candlelight processions and joyful carols.

Though the Mass need not strictly begin at midnight today (many parishes celebrate it earlier for practicality), the symbolism endures. The Vatican, under recent popes, has sometimes shifted the time, but the essence remains: gathering in the heart of the night to welcome Christ's birth. This year, as in centuries past, Catholics worldwide will flock to churches, bundled against the cold, to sing "Silent Night" and receive the Eucharist at the moment when Christmas Day begins.

 Reflections on the Readings for Midnight Mass

The readings for the Midnight Mass (Lectionary 14) are timeless, proclaimed every year on this solemnity, drawing us deeper into the mystery. They paint a vivid picture of light breaking into darkness, of God's grace appearing in the humble birth of the Savior.

The First Reading from Isaiah 9:1-6 proclaims: "The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light; upon those who dwelt in the land of gloom a light has shone." Written in a time of Assyrian oppression, when Israel was divided and despairing, Isaiah foretells a child born to bring endless peace, with titles like Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. This prophecy finds fulfillment in Jesus, the light that dispels not just political gloom, but the deeper darkness of sin and separation from God. On this cold night, these words resonate profoundly—we all know personal "lands of gloom": grief, anxiety, moral failure. Yet Christ shines forth, multiplying joy and breaking the yoke of burdens. He is not a distant deity but a child born for us, whose government of justice and peace knows no end.

The Responsorial Psalm, Psalm 96, calls all creation to "sing to the Lord a new song." It invites the heavens, earth, sea, and fields to rejoice, for the Lord comes to rule the world with justice. In the midnight stillness, this psalm echoes the cosmic celebration of the Nativity—the angels' song, the stars' brilliance. It reminds us that Christ's birth is not a private event but a universal salvation, renewing the earth itself.

The Second Reading from Titus 2:11-14 declares: "The grace of God has appeared, saving all." Paul writes to Titus about living temperately while awaiting Christ's return, but on Christmas, we see this grace manifested in the Incarnation. Jesus redeems us from lawlessness, purifying us as His people, eager for good works. This reading bridges past and future: the grace that appeared in Bethlehem trains us for godly lives now, in anticipation of His glorious return. It challenges us amid holiday festivities—to reject ungodliness and embrace zeal for good deeds, imitating the self-giving love of the infant King.

Finally, the Gospel from Luke 2:1-14 narrates the familiar yet ever-awe-inspiring story: the census under Quirinius, Mary and Joseph's journey to Bethlehem, the birth in the manger "because there was no room for them in the inn." Then, the angels appear to shepherds: "Do not be afraid; for behold, I proclaim to you good news of great joy... For today in the city of David a savior has been born for you who is Messiah and Lord." Glory to God in the highest, and peace to those on whom His favor rests.

This Gospel captures the humility and joy of the Nativity. The Savior comes not to emperors but to lowly shepherds, outsiders keeping night watch. The sign is a baby in a feeding trough—scandalously ordinary, yet extraordinarily divine. In the dark fields, the glory of the Lord shines around them, terrifying yet transformative. The angels' hymn—"Gloria in excelsis Deo"—is the Church's song at Midnight Mass, bursting forth after the quiet of Advent.

Reflecting on these readings together, we see a tapestry of anticipation fulfilled. Isaiah's light dawns in Luke's manger; Titus' grace is the child who will give Himself for us. On this Christmas Eve, in the dark cold night, we wait like the shepherds—alert, expectant. The readings invite us to make room for Him, to let His light shatter our gloom, to sing glory amid the silence.

As Midnight Mass concludes and we step back into the night, perhaps with snow falling or stars gleaming, the newborn Lord accompanies us. The wait is over; the Light has come. Yet in a sense, the anticipation continues—we carry Christ into the world, awaiting His final coming. This Christmas Eve teaches us that in every dark night of the soul, God is near, ready to be born anew. May the peace of that holy night fill our hearts, now and forever.

Cardinal Dolan vs Hispanic Catholics

Cardinal Dolan's Final Act: Striking Back at Yonkers' Hispanic Community

In the waning days of his tenure as Archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy Dolan has issued what many are calling a parting shot at one of the archdiocese's most vibrant Hispanic communities: the parishioners of St. Mary's Church (officially the Church of the Immaculate Conception) in Yonkers. Just days after Pope Leo XIV accepted his resignation and appointed Bishop Ronald Hicks as his successor, Dolan released a new decree reaffirming the merger of St. Mary's parish into another, effectively sidelining the historic church that has served immigrants for 175 years. This move has reignited accusations that Dolan has long been unfriendly toward the growing Hispanic population in the archdiocese, prioritizing administrative consolidation over pastoral care for Latino Catholics.

St. Mary's Church, often dubbed the "Cathedral of the Hudson River Valley," stands as a symbol of immigrant resilience in Yonkers. Founded in 1848, it has historically welcomed waves of newcomers—Irish, Italian, and now predominantly Hispanic, with many parishioners from Dominican, Mexican, and other Latin American backgrounds. The community is known for its outreach to new immigrants, providing food, clothing, and support amid ongoing arrivals. Yet, under Dolan's leadership, the church has faced repeated threats of closure or merger, culminating in this latest decree that critics say defies a prior Vatican reversal.

The controversy traces back years. Dolan sought an "extinctive union" merging Immaculate Conception Parish (St. Mary's) with St. Peter-St. Denis Parish, meaning St. Mary's would lose its independent status. Largely Hispanic parishioners appealed, arguing the merger disregarded their cultural and spiritual needs. After Dolan rejected their appeal, they escalated to the Vatican's Dicastery for the Clergy, which revoked his decree earlier this year—the first such reversal in the Archdiocese of New York's history and only the ninth in modern U.S. Catholic history.

Undeterred, Dolan has now issued a new decree, described by local reports as disobedient to the Vatican. In it, he references "white flight to the suburbs, together with a substantial immigration of Hispanics," framing demographic shifts in a way that some see as dismissive. The decree also eliminates Spanish-language Masses previously offered, leaving only limited bilingual options initiated by parishioners themselves. Attendance at St. Mary's is reportedly at 80% capacity, with growth among Hispanic members—hardly the profile of a dying parish.

This isn't an isolated incident. Throughout Dolan's 16-year tenure (2009-2025), critics have pointed to a pattern of actions that appear hostile or indifferent to Hispanic Catholics, who now form a significant portion of the archdiocese's faithful. The Archdiocese of New York serves about 2.8 million Catholics, with Hispanics comprising a growing demographic—nearly one million in the region, by some estimates. Yet, Dolan's policies on parish reorganizations have disproportionately affected immigrant-heavy urban parishes.

The "Making All Things New" planning process (2010-2015) led to numerous mergers and closures, often in areas with strong Latino presence. In Yonkers alone, multiple churches serving immigrant communities faced consolidation. While financial pressures—declining attendance overall, priest shortages, and massive settlements for clergy abuse claims (over $300 million announced in 2025)—are cited as justifications, critics argue these decisions ignored the vitality of Hispanic parishes. St. Mary's, for instance, was deemed in need of $10 million in repairs, a figure disputed by independent engineers as exaggerated. The archdiocese banned the parish from fundraising for repairs, further fueling suspicions.

Broader criticisms highlight Dolan's silence on immigration issues affecting Hispanics. Despite the national debate over migrant rights and policies, Dolan remained notably quiet, even as other bishops advocated strongly. His associations drew scrutiny too: praising conservative figures criticized for anti-Latino rhetoric indirectly tied him to broader insensitivity.

Perhaps most emblematic of perceived unfriendliness is Dolan's approach to episcopal appointments. Despite the rapid growth of Hispanic Catholics, he appointed mostly white auxiliary bishops during his tenure. It wasn't until 2022—late in his leadership—that he welcomed the appointment of Bishop Joseph Espaillat, a Dominican-American priest, as auxiliary bishop. Espaillat, born in New York to Dominican immigrants, became the first Dominican-origin bishop in the U.S. and the youngest at the time.

While celebrated by many as a milestone, some viewed it as tokenism—a superficial gesture amid years of underrepresentation. Espaillat's appointment came from Pope Francis, not Dolan directly, and followed calls for greater Latino leadership. Critics noted it as the only such appointment under Dolan, despite Hispanics being "not just part of the Catholic Church in New York, they are the Church here," as Dolan himself once acknowledged in a Lenten message.

Espaillat's rise has been refreshing for many Dominican Catholics, who see him as a bridge to younger, urban Latinos. Known for his engaging style—rapping, podcasting on "Sainthood in the City," and youth ministry—he represents the future. Yet, his appointment highlighted the delay: why only one, and so late? Where is the Puerto Rican bishop? Puerto Rican Catholics paved the wave for other Hispanics by joining the late Bishop Francis Garmendia of Basque decent as he founded the Charistmatic Center. 

Dolan's defenders point to efforts like supporting Hispanic ministry, Lenten videos in Spanish, and a mural at St. Patrick's Cathedral celebrating immigrants. He oversaw outreach and acknowledged Latinos' importance. But actions like the Yonkers decree overshadow these, especially as his successor, Bishop Hicks—a missionary with experience in Latin America and fluency in Spanish—signals a potential shift toward greater inclusion.

Hicks, who has expressed a "great heart" for the Latino community, takes over in February 2026. Parishioners at St. Mary's are appealing Dolan's latest decree to the Vatican again, hoping the new leadership brings reconciliation.

This episode raises deeper questions about the Church's adaptation to demographic reality. As white attendance declines in urban areas, Hispanic Catholics sustain many parishes. Policies that merge or close these without robust alternatives risk alienating the faithful keeping the Church alive.

Cardinal Dolan's legacy is complex: media-savvy, charismatic, defender against secular threats. But in Yonkers, many Hispanic Catholics feel his final act was one of retribution—striking back at a community that dared appeal to Rome. Whether valid under canon law or not, it leaves a bitter taste as he exits.

The Church in New York stands at a crossroads. With Hicks incoming, perhaps a more welcoming era for Hispanics begins. For St. Mary's parishioners, the fight continues—not just for a building, but for recognition that their faith matters.

 References and Links

1. "Cardinal Dolan Takes a Final Shot at Yonkers and its Hispanic Community" - Yonkers Times (December 22, 2025): https://yonkerstimes.com/cardinal-dolan-takes-a-final-shot-at-yonkers-and-its-hispanic-community/

2. "Cardinal Dolan Destroys Archdiocese of NY" - Sacerdotus Blog (2025): https://www.sacerdotus.com/2025/12/cardinal-dolan-destroys-archdiocese-of.html (Discusses auxiliary appointments and perceptions of tokenism regarding Bishop Espaillat)

3. "Joseph Espaillat is New York's first Dominican bishop" - National Catholic Reporter: https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/joseph-espaillat-new-yorks-first-dominican-bishop-what-does-mean-our-church

4. "Hispanic Community in Yonkers Rallies to Save St. Mary’s Church" - Yonkers Times (2024): https://yonkerstimes.com/hispanic-community-in-yonkers-rallies-to-save-st-marys-church/

5. "Pope Leo replaces New York's Cardinal Dolan in shake-up of US Church" - Reuters (December 18, 2025): https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pope-leo-replaces-new-yorks-cardinal-dolan-shake-up-us-church-2025-12-18/

6. Wikipedia entry on Joseph A. Espaillat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_A._Espaillat (For background on his 2022 appointment)

7. Archdiocese of New York official statements and historical parish data referenced from various reports on "Making All Things New" reorganizations.