.jpg)
In November 2025, as millions of American families scramble to put food on the table amid the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, one thing is crystal clear: the U.S. government has utterly failed its most basic duty. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, which feeds over 42 million low-income Americans—including children, seniors, and people with disabilities—has been slashed, delayed, and weaponized in a petty partisan standoff. President Donald Trump, a Republican-controlled Congress, and a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices have collectively decided that scoring political points is more important than preventing widespread hunger. This is not governance; it's cruelty disguised as fiscal responsibility.
The shutdown, now in its 40th day as of November 9, 2025, began over disagreements on extending Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies set to expire at year's end. Democrats insisted on including a one-year extension in any funding bill to prevent premium spikes for millions. Republicans, led by Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, refused, accusing Democrats of holding the government "hostage" for "free healthcare for illegal aliens"—a blatant falsehood, as the ACA does not cover undocumented immigrants. Trump demanded a clean continuing resolution with no health policy attachments, vowing to let the shutdown drag on indefinitely to force concessions. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this hardline stance, rejecting bipartisan compromises and even piecemeal bills to fund essentials like SNAP.
What started as a budget dispute has devolved into a humanitarian disaster. The Trump administration initially refused to tap contingency funds for SNAP, claiming insufficient resources despite billions available. Lower courts ordered full funding, but the Supreme Court—on November 7—granted an emergency stay, temporarily blocking those orders and allowing partial or zero benefits to continue. This judicial intervention, siding with Trump's appeals, has left families in limbo, with some states clawing back already-issued full payments under threat of penalties.
This isn't about money—SNAP costs about $9 billion monthly, with $6 billion in contingency reserves explicitly for emergencies like this. It's about power. Trump has used the shutdown to pressure Democrats, even posting on social media that SNAP would resume only if they capitulated. Congress, paralyzed by tribalism, has failed to override this chaos. And the Supreme Court, by pausing mandates to fully fund anti-hunger programs, has enabled the executive's gamesmanship. The result? Millions go hungry while politicians play chicken with lives.
The Shutdown's Origins: Petty Demands Over People's Needs
The roots of this crisis trace back to September 2025, when Congress failed to pass full-year appropriations or a continuing resolution (CR) before the fiscal year ended on September 30. Trump, fresh off his 2024 victory, pushed for deep cuts to non-defense spending and refused any deal tying funding to ACA enhancements. Democrats, controlling neither chamber but holding leverage in the Senate's 60-vote threshold, demanded protections for healthcare subsidies affecting 20 million Americans.
On October 1, the government shut down. Trump canceled negotiations, calling Democratic offers "unserious." Republicans falsely framed the impasse as Democrats demanding "gender mutilation procedures" or aid for immigrants. In reality, it was about preventing healthcare costs from skyrocketing. Thune attempted 14 votes on a clean CR through November 21; Democrats blocked each, offering compromises like a one-year ACA extension plus a bipartisan committee for long-term reforms. Republicans rejected all, with Trump vowing no talks until Democrats folded.
By late October, the shutdown's pain escalated. The USDA announced SNAP benefits would lapse on November 1—the first time in the program's 60-year history. Contingency funds existed, but Trump officials claimed they couldn't be used fully without congressional approval, a dubious interpretation ignored in past shutdowns.
This wasn't inevitable. Past administrations, including Trump's first term, used workarounds to keep SNAP flowing. Here, Trump weaponized it, suggesting benefits would resume only post-concession. Congress dithered, with Johnson refusing to recall the House for targeted fixes. The Supreme Court later enabled this by staying lower court orders mandating full payments.
Devastating Effects: From Empty Pantries to National Chaos
The impacts are catastrophic and far-reaching. SNAP serves 42 million people—39% children, many elderly or disabled. Average benefits: $187 per person monthly. Without them, families skip meals, substitute junk food, or turn to emergency pantries already overwhelmed.
Initially, no November benefits issued. States warned of delays; some like Delaware and New York scrambled state funds or emergencies. Trump admin flipped: 50% payments, then 65%, then full under court order—only for Supreme Court to block it on November 7. Some states issued full benefits; USDA demanded they "undo" them, threatening penalties. Chaos ensued: EBT cards failed, transactions rejected.
Furloughs hit hard: 1.4 million federal workers unpaid, many essential like air traffic controllers working without pay. FAA slashed flights 10% at 40 airports; over 2,500 cancellations by November 9. National parks closed or unstaffed; trash piled up.
Other services cratered: SSI court cases paused, delaying disability benefits. Head Start for 58,600 kids risked closure. LIHEAP energy assistance delayed. WIC partially affected. Housing vouchers continued short-term, but new applications halted; evictions loomed.
Military families hit food pantries in droves—300% increases some places. Unpaid workers piled bills; morale plummeted. Economic ripple: Reduced spending, strained food banks, potential recession signals.
Trump's role? Callous. He paid troops early but let civilians suffer, threatening no backpay. Congress? Spineless—Republicans blocked standalone SNAP bills; Democrats' compromises ignored. Supreme Court? Complicit, prioritizing "separation of powers" over starving kids by staying funding mandates.
This affects real people: A Pittsburgh widow rationing for her disabled nephew. Texas families choosing rent over food. Children going hungry pre-Thanksgiving.
Why This is Unforgivable: Basic Needs Aren't Bargaining Chips
SNAP isn't welfare—it's survival. It lifts millions from poverty, boosts economy ($1.50 per $1 spent). Cutting it over ACA subsidies? Absurd. Issues like border walls or tax cuts pale next to feeding children.
Trump's tactics: Using hunger as leverage, echoing his first-term shutdowns but worse. Congress: Failed oversight, letting one man hold nation hostage. Supreme Court: By blocking full funding, they greenlit suffering, arguing irreparable harm to budget over kids' empty stomachs.
Polls show Americans blame Republicans more. Yet no accountability.
Solutions: Make Essentials Shutdown-Proof and Punish the Culprits
This must never happen again. First, pass a law mandating automatic funding for core safety nets—SNAP, WIC, SSI, Medicaid, housing vouchers, LIHEAP—during shutdowns. Use multi-year contingencies or mandatory spending exemptions under Antideficiency Act. No discretion for presidents to withhold.
Second, freeze politicians' salaries from day one of shutdown. No pay until resolved. Extend to staff, leadership bonuses.
Third, penalties for bad-faith prolonging: Fines per day after 14 days, docked from party funds or personal salaries if proven political (e.g., Trump’s posts). Independent commission to investigate, impose sanctions.
Fourth, end filibuster for CRs or require supermajority for shutdowns. Automatic CRs if no budget by deadline.
Fifth, backpay guarantees for workers, no threats.
These aren't radical—similar proposals floated post-2019 shutdown. Bipartisan support exists when not poisoned by partisanship.
A Call to Action: Demand Better from Our Leaders
America is better than this. We feed the hungry, house the vulnerable, care for the sick—not dangle them as pawns. Trump, Congress, Supreme Court: Your legacy is hunger amid plenty. Voters remember.
Contact representatives. Support anti-hunger groups. Vote out enablers.
End this now. Fund the government. Protect the people.
Sources
1. NPR: SNAP runs out of money Nov. 1 (web:0)
2. Snopes: Will SNAP benefits be issued in November 2025? (web:1)
3. Food Research & Action Center: How Will a Government Shutdown Affect SNAP Benefits? (web:2)
4. The Guardian: US supreme court issues emergency order blocking full Snap food aid payments (web:3)
5. NPR: Supreme Court temporarily blocks full SNAP benefits (web:4)
6. NPR: Trump administration will fund SNAP at 50% (web:5)
7. CNN: Food stamps: Understanding what’s happening with SNAP benefits (web:6)
8. Wikipedia: 2025 United States federal government shutdown (web:40, web:70)
9. NPR: The federal government is still shut down (web:42)
10. The New York Times: Government Shutdown Imperils SNAP (web:55)
11. Various court filings and USDA memos referenced in NPR, NYT, Guardian articles (web:20-39)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.