Showing posts with label homicide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homicide. Show all posts

Friday, December 6, 2024

Daniel Penny Trial Update VI

Title: The Daniel Penny Trial: A Complex Journey Through Justice

The trial of Daniel Penny, a former Marine charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in the death of Jordan Neely, has been a focal point of public attention and legal scrutiny. As the trial progresses, recent developments have added layers of complexity to an already intricate case. This blog post delves into the latest updates, including the dropping of charges and the jury's deadlock.

Background of the Case

On May 1, 2023, Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, was killed after being placed in a chokehold by Daniel Penny on a New York City subway. Neely, known for his Michael Jackson impersonations, had a history of mental illness and erratic behavior. On the day of the incident, witnesses described Neely as acting aggressively and making threatening statements. Penny, a 25-year-old Marine veteran, intervened and restrained Neely in a chokehold for nearly six minutes, leading to Neely's death.

The Charges

Daniel Penny was initially charged with second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide. The prosecution argued that Penny's actions were reckless and excessive, leading to Neely's death. The defense, on the other hand, contended that Penny acted in self-defense and in defense of other passengers on the subway.

Jury Deliberations and Deadlock

The jury began deliberations on the charges against Penny on December 3, 2024. After more than 20 hours of deliberation over several days, the jury reported that they were unable to reach a unanimous decision on the second-degree manslaughter charge. This deadlock prompted Judge Maxwell Wiley to issue an Allen charge, instructing the jury to continue deliberating and make every possible effort to reach a verdict.

Despite the judge's instructions, the jury remained deadlocked on the manslaughter charge. The defense requested a mistrial, arguing that the Allen charge could be coercive. However, Judge Wiley denied the request, stating that it was too early to declare a mistrial and encouraged the jury to continue their deliberations.

Dropping of the Manslaughter Charge

On December 6, 2024, after further deliberations, the jury informed the judge that they were still unable to reach a unanimous decision on the manslaughter charge. In response, the prosecution agreed to dismiss the manslaughter charge to allow the jury to consider the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide. The defense again requested a mistrial, but the judge granted the prosecution's request, allowing the jury to focus on the remaining charge.

Key Testimonies and Evidence

Throughout the trial, jurors heard testimonies from various witnesses, including subway passengers, police officers, medical experts, and a Marine Corps instructor who taught Penny chokehold techniques. The testimonies provided a detailed account of the events leading up to Neely's death and the immediate aftermath.

Jurors also reviewed video footage recorded by bystanders and police body cameras, which captured the chaotic scene on the subway and Penny's interactions with law enforcement. These videos were crucial in illustrating the context of the incident and the actions taken by Penny.

Broader Implications

The Daniel Penny trial has raised significant questions about public safety, mental health, and the use of force. The case has divided public opinion, with some viewing Penny as a protector of fellow subway riders and others seeing him as a vigilante who took the law into his own hands. The trial has also highlighted the challenges faced by individuals with mental illness and the need for better support systems.

Conclusion

As the jury continues to deliberate on the charge of criminally negligent homicide, the outcome of the Daniel Penny trial remains uncertain. The case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in legal proceedings and the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process. Regardless of the verdict, the trial has sparked important conversations about justice, safety, and mental health in our society.

If Penny is exonerated, this will lead to an open season on the homeless, mentally ill and vigilantism. People will be killed just for acting strangely or screaming.  Citizens will take it upon themselves to become "heroes" and kill people under a false pretense of "self-defense."  


Sources:

: [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/US/daniel-penny-jury-trial-vote-jordan-neely/story?id=116404879)

: [MSN](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/daniel-penny-trial-top-manslaughter-charge-dismissed-in-nyc-subway-chokehold-case-after-jury-deadlock/ar-AA1vpMbr)

: [NBC News](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jury-daniel-penny-trial-tells-judge-cant-reach-agreement-manslaughter-rcna183185)

: [MSN](https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/jury-in-daniel-penny-trial-tells-judge-they-can-t-reach-agreement-on-manslaughter-charge/ar-AA1voU4m)

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/05/marine-daniel-penny-kills-homeless.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/06/daniel-penny-jordan-williams-self.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2024/10/trial-begins-for-marine-daniel-penny.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/06/daniel-penny-arraigned-jordan-williams.html

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Daniel Penny Trial Update V

Title: The Daniel Penny Trial: Closing Arguments and the Path to Justice

The trial of Daniel Penny, a former Marine charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in the death of Jordan Neely, has captivated public attention and sparked intense debate. As the trial reaches its final stages, the closing arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense offer a comprehensive view of the case and its broader implications.

Background of the Case

On May 1, 2023, Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man, was killed after being placed in a chokehold by Daniel Penny on a New York City subway. Neely, known for his Michael Jackson impersonations, had a history of mental illness and erratic behavior. On the day of the incident, witnesses described Neely as acting aggressively and making threatening statements. Penny, a 25-year-old Marine veteran, intervened and restrained Neely in a chokehold for nearly six minutes, leading to Neely's death.

Prosecution's Closing Arguments

The prosecution, led by Assistant District Attorney Dafna Yoran, argued that Penny's actions were reckless and excessive. They emphasized that Penny held Neely in a chokehold for far too long, even after Neely ceased to be a threat. The prosecution presented evidence from the city's medical examiner, who concluded that the chokehold caused Neely's death. They also highlighted video footage showing Penny demonstrating the chokehold to police, which they argued showed a clear understanding of the potential lethality of his actions.

Yoran stated, "Under the law, deadly physical force such as a chokehold is permitted only when it is absolutely necessary and for only as long as is absolutely necessary. And here, the defendant went way too far". The prosecution contended that Penny's actions were not justified and that he acted with indifference to Neely's life.

Defense's Closing Arguments

The defense, represented by attorney Steven Raiser, painted a different picture. They argued that Penny acted in self-defense and in defense of other passengers on the subway. Raiser described Neely as "violent and desperate," causing passengers to be "frozen with fear". The defense contended that Penny did not intend to kill Neely but was forced to maintain the chokehold out of fear that Neely would break free and pose a further threat.

Raiser also challenged the prosecution's medical evidence, presenting an alternate theory that Neely's death was caused by a combination of factors, including a genetic condition, synthetic marijuana in his system, and the struggle itself. The defense argued that Penny's actions were not those of a vigilante but of a concerned individual trying to protect others.

Key Testimonies and Evidence

Throughout the month-long trial, jurors heard testimonies from various witnesses, including subway passengers, police officers, medical experts, and a Marine Corps instructor who taught Penny chokehold techniques. The testimonies provided a detailed account of the events leading up to Neely's death and the immediate aftermath.

Jurors also watched videos recorded by bystanders and police body cameras, which captured the chaotic scene on the subway and Penny's interactions with law enforcement. These videos were crucial in illustrating the context of the incident and the actions taken by Penny.

Broader Implications

The Daniel Penny trial has raised significant questions about public safety, mental health, and the use of force. The case has divided public opinion, with some viewing Penny as a protector of fellow subway riders and others seeing him as a vigilante who took the law into his own hands. The trial has also highlighted the challenges faced by individuals with mental illness and the need for better support systems.

Conclusion

As the jury prepares to deliberate, the closing arguments have provided a comprehensive overview of the case and the key issues at stake. The outcome of the trial will have far-reaching implications, not only for Daniel Penny and Jordan Neely's family but also for broader societal discussions on justice, safety, and mental health. The trial serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in such cases and the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process.

---

: [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/US/closing-arguments-daniel-penny-trial-jordan-neely/story?id=116198488)

: [MSN](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/daniel-penny-trial-enters-closing-arguments-in-jordan-neelys-subway-chokehold-death/ar-AA1v7azd)

: [ABC News](https://abcnews.go.com/US/closing-arguments-expected-monday-daniel-penny-trial/story?id=116350793)

: [AP News](https://apnews.com/article/daniel-penny-nyc-subway-chokehold-death-trial-f1c93630217a3abb9e675db465ebe272)

: [NBC New York](https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/daniel-penny-trial-closing-arguments/6031882/)

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/05/marine-daniel-penny-kills-homeless.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/06/daniel-penny-jordan-williams-self.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2024/10/trial-begins-for-marine-daniel-penny.html

https://www.sacerdotus.com/2023/06/daniel-penny-arraigned-jordan-williams.html

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Charged with Unborn Homicide?

Annette Morales Rodriguez, a obviously mentally disturbed individual attacked the pregnant Maritza Ramirez Cruz with a bat, strangled her and cut her fetus right out of the womb!  This happened in October of 2011.  

Supposedly Rodriguez miscarried a few times and wanted a child so she literally tore one out from another woman.  She is facing charges of intentional homicide, and homicide of an unborn child.

This crime is horrific and shows how evil human beings can be.  The idea of attacking a pregnant woman and cutting out her fetus is something one could possibly see in a horror film.  How can anyone do this or even think this scenario in their mind?    

The thing that I wonder about is the charge of homicide of an unborn child.  It is just that this disturbed individual face this charge and the intentional homicide one; however, the law is a hypocritical here.  Some Abortion procedures pretty much do exactly what Rodriguez did. They extract the fetus out either whole or in pieces.  This is legal and profitable since it is a "medical procedure" that is not free. 


How is it that this is legal and a doctor makes money doing this, but Rodriguez's act is criminal and she faces charges of homicide of an unborn child?  Some thing is definitely wrong here.  
 Both evil acts SHOULD BE CRIMINAL.  


Maritza and her baby boy, May they rest in God's peace. 






Source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/annette-morales-rodriguez-trial-maritza-ramirez-cruz-fetus_n_1889730.html?ref=topbar

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1555) Jesus (722) God (705) Bible (595) Atheism (391) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (272) Apologetics (252) Science (231) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (89) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (72) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Health (47) Biology (46) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Morality (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) CUNY (11) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Massimo Pigliucci (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)