Pluto To Be a Planet Again?

 

Pluto’s Comeback Kid: NASA Calls for the Ninth Planet to Return

In a surprising twist nearly two decades after Pluto was stripped of its planetary title, NASA’s top official is leading the charge to “Make Pluto a Planet Again.” During an April 28, 2026, Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on NASA’s 2027 budget, Administrator Jared Isaacman didn’t mince words: “I am very much in the camp of ‘make Pluto a planet again.’” He revealed that NASA is already preparing scientific papers to push the scientific community to revisit the 2006 demotion.

The announcement has reignited a debate that has divided astronomers, planetary scientists, and the public since the International Astronomical Union (IAU) voted to reclassify Pluto as a “dwarf planet.” But why was Pluto demoted in the first place—and why are so many, including NASA’s leader, arguing it deserves to be called a planet again, size be damned?

 Why Pluto Lost Its Planet Status

Pluto was discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh and immediately embraced as the ninth planet. For 76 years, it held that title in textbooks, classrooms, and popular culture. Everything changed at the IAU’s 2006 General Assembly in Prague. Astronomers adopted a new, formal definition of a planet to address the growing number of Kuiper Belt objects being discovered. Under the IAU criteria, a planet must:

1. Orbit the Sun.  

2. Have enough mass for its gravity to pull it into a nearly round shape (hydrostatic equilibrium).  

3. Clear the neighborhood around its orbit of other debris and objects.

Pluto easily meets the first two requirements—it orbits the Sun and is round enough to qualify as a dwarf planet. But it fails the third. Pluto resides in the crowded Kuiper Belt, sharing its orbital zone with thousands of other icy bodies, including some nearly as large as itself (the so-called “plutinos”). The IAU decided this meant Pluto hadn’t “cleared its neighborhood,” so it was downgraded to dwarf planet status alongside Eris, Ceres, Haumea, and Makemake.

The decision was pragmatic for astronomers trying to keep the solar system’s “planet” list manageable, but it sparked global outrage. Schoolchildren wrote angry letters. “Pluto is a planet!” bumper stickers appeared. And scientists themselves remain split.

 Neil deGrasse Tyson’s Take: “Pluto Had It Coming”

Few figures have been more closely associated with Pluto’s demotion than astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. As director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York, Tyson famously removed Pluto from the planet exhibit years before the IAU vote, drawing public backlash. In his book The Pluto Files and numerous interviews, Tyson has defended the change. He argues Pluto never truly “belonged” among the major planets—its eccentric, tilted orbit crosses Neptune’s path, and it’s one of many similar objects in the Kuiper Belt.

Tyson has quipped that “Pluto had it coming” and that it’s “happier” as the king of the dwarf planets and Kuiper Belt objects. He urges the public to “get over it,” emphasizing that science refines its classifications as knowledge grows. We didn’t lose a planet, he says—we gained an entire new category of fascinating icy worlds.

Tyson’s view represents the astronomical community’s focus on orbital dynamics and the need for a clean, functional taxonomy. But not everyone agrees—especially planetary scientists who study surfaces, geology, and atmospheres rather than just orbits.

 Why Pluto Is a Planet—Despite Its Size

Here’s the key point many people miss: size was never the official reason for Pluto’s demotion. The IAU definition doesn’t set a minimum diameter. Pluto is smaller than Earth’s Moon (about 1,400 miles across), but so are some accepted planetary traits in other contexts. The real issue was the “clearing the neighborhood” rule.

Critics of the IAU definition—including prominent planetary scientist Philip Metzger—argue that the third criterion is arbitrary, historically inconsistent, and rarely used in actual planetary research. No planet perfectly clears its orbit (Earth has asteroids sharing its path; Jupiter has Trojan asteroids). Metzger’s research shows the IAU’s definition would exclude objects we intuitively call planets and that planetary scientists already use “planet” to describe geologically complex, rounded bodies regardless of orbital crowding.

Pluto punches way above its weight in scientific interest. NASA’s New Horizons mission (which flew by in 2015) revealed a surprisingly active world: towering mountains of water ice, flowing glaciers of frozen nitrogen, a thin atmosphere, and possibly a subsurface ocean. It has five moons, including the massive Charon, and shows ongoing geological activity—features we associate with “real” planets. In complexity, Pluto ranks second only to Earth in our solar system, ahead of Mars.

Planetary scientists argue that a better definition focuses on what makes something a world: intrinsic properties like roundness from self-gravity, geological activity, and the ability to tell us about solar system formation—not how many neighbors it has. Under that lens, Pluto is undeniably a planet. Calling it one doesn’t require adding hundreds of Kuiper Belt objects; it simply recognizes that Pluto is a dynamic, fascinating body worthy of the title it held for most of the 20th century.

 The Road Ahead

Isaacman’s comments suggest NASA isn’t just nostalgia-tripping. The agency is preparing papers to formally challenge the IAU’s stance and elevate the discussion in the broader scientific community. Whether the IAU reverses course remains uncertain—classifications like this are sticky—but the momentum is building. A child’s viral letter even helped spark recent interest, showing the issue still captures public imagination.

Pluto’s story reminds us that science is alive. Definitions evolve with discovery. Whether you side with Tyson’s orbital purism or the planetary scientists’ call for geological relevance, one thing is clear: Pluto has never stopped being extraordinary. It may soon reclaim its place among the planets—proving that even the smallest worlds can have the biggest comebacks.

What do you think—should Pluto get its planet card back? Drop your thoughts in the comments!

Sources  

- USA Today: “NASA’s Jared Isaacman affirms stance that Pluto is a planet” (April 30, 2026)  

- Space.com: “NASA chief Jared Isaacman says he’s fighting for Pluto” (April 29, 2026)  

- Scientific American: “NASA chief Jared Isaacman hints at campaign to make Pluto a planet again” (April 29, 2026)  

- Library of Congress: “Why is Pluto no longer a planet?”  

- Big Think / Neil deGrasse Tyson interviews on Pluto (various, 2017 onward)  

- University of Central Florida / Philip Metzger research on planet definition (2018)  

Comet 3I/ATLAS: UFO or Comet? Now We know!

Update on Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: Closest Approach to Earth on December 19, 2025

As of December 22, 2025, the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS—the third confirmed object from beyond our solar system—has just completed its closest passage to Earth on December 19. At its nearest, it approached within approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 270 million kilometers or 168 million miles), posing no threat whatsoever. This distant flyby marked a historic moment for astronomy, offering unprecedented observations of material formed around another star billions of years ago.

Discovered on July 1, 2025, by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope in Chile, 3I/ATLAS quickly captured global attention due to its hyperbolic trajectory, confirming its origin outside our solar system. Unlike solar system comets bound to elliptical orbits, this visitor entered from interstellar space, reached perihelion (closest to the Sun) on October 29 at 1.36 AU, and is now outbound, never to return.

Observers worldwide tracked its journey, with peak visibility in November when it reached magnitudes around 9-11, faintly visible in binoculars under dark skies. Post-perihelion, it emerged from solar conjunction, allowing renewed ground- and space-based studies. As it passed Earth, it was located in the constellation Leo, fading to magnitude 13-15, requiring larger telescopes for viewing.

 Addressing the Surrounding Claims and Observations

3I/ATLAS has sparked intense discussion, including several claims about anomalous behavior. Here's a breakdown based on the latest scientific data:

- Non-Gravitational Acceleration: Precise astrometry revealed small deviations from a purely gravitational path, with accelerations around 5 × 10⁻⁷ m/s². This is typical for active comets, caused by asymmetric outgassing—jets of sublimating ices acting like thrusters. Observations confirm significant activity, including a coma and tail, attributing the effect to carbon dioxide and water ice sublimation. No evidence suggests artificial propulsion.

- "Rockets" or Jet-Like Features: High-resolution images from Hubble and ground telescopes showed wobbling gas and dust jets, linked to the nucleus's rotation (period ~15.5 hours). These natural outbursts explain brightness surges and minor trajectory shifts, common in comets as uneven heating exposes fresh ices.

- Trajectory Changes and Jupiter Alignment: The comet's path aligns closely with the ecliptic plane, passing Venus, Mars, and approaching Jupiter at 0.36 AU on March 16, 2026. Minor non-gravitational effects may slightly alter its outbound trajectory, but no dramatic "masking" or diversion tied to Earth's perihelion (January) occurred. The timing near solar conjunction limited Earth views during perihelion, but spacecraft filled gaps.

- X-Rays Emission: For the first time in an interstellar object, XMM-Newton and XRISM detected soft X-rays from 3I/ATLAS in late November-December. This glow results from charge exchange: solar wind ions colliding with neutral gases in the coma, producing emissions from carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. It confirms strong interaction with the solar wind, similar to solar system comets.

- Radio Waves: MeerKAT radio telescope detected absorption lines in October-November, caused by hydroxyl (OH) radicals—breakdown products of water ice under solar UV. This natural "radio signal" indicates active water outgassing, debunking modulated or artificial interpretations.

- Pulsating Behavior: Some reports noted periodic brightness variations, tied to the nucleus's rotation exposing different surfaces to sunlight. Jets and outbursts caused fluctuations, but no unexplained pulsing beyond rotational effects.

Overall, these features align with an active, icy comet, though its interstellar origin makes comparisons fascinating—showing both similarities and subtle differences in composition.

 Latest Updates on Life-Building Molecules and Panspermia Implications

Recent spectroscopic data from JWST, ALMA, and VLT have revealed 3I/ATLAS to be unusually rich in certain prebiotic compounds. Key detections include:

- High abundances of methanol (CH₃OH) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN), with ratios among the highest observed in comets.

- Carbon dioxide (dominant volatile), carbon monoxide, carbonyl sulfide, cyanide gas, and atomic nickel vapor—at levels comparable to solar system comets.

- Hints of water ice and vapor, though less dominant than in some Oort cloud comets.

These molecules are fundamental building blocks for amino acids, sugars, and other organics essential to life as we know it. The enrichment suggests formation in a cold, carbon-rich environment around its parent star, possibly differing from our Sun's protoplanetary disk.

This ties into panspermia discussions: the hypothesis that life (or its precursors) spreads via comets/asteroids. While no direct evidence of life exists on 3I/ATLAS, its organics demonstrate interstellar space teems with complex chemistry. Comets like this could deliver such material to young planetary systems, seeding habitable worlds. Pseudo-panspermia—the transfer of organic molecules—is well-supported; full lithopanspermia (microbes surviving interstellar travel) remains speculative but bolstered by extremophile resilience studies.

As 3I/ATLAS recedes, ongoing observations (including potential Jupiter flyby effects) will refine models of its composition and trajectory. This visitor has provided a rare window into alien planetary formation, reminding us our solar system is not isolated in the cosmic chemistry of life.

 Citations

1. NASA Science: Comet 3I/ATLAS Facts and FAQs (2025).

2. Wikipedia: 3I/ATLAS (accessed December 2025).

3. ESA: XMM-Newton Observations of 3I/ATLAS (December 2025).

4. arXiv: Studies on Non-Gravitational Acceleration in 3I/ATLAS (2025 preprints).

5. ALMA/JWST Reports on Molecular Detections (November-December 2025).

6. MeerKAT/SARAO: Radio Observations (October-November 2025).

7. TheSkyLive/NASA JPL Horizons: Trajectory Data (2025).

8. Panspermia Reviews: Wickramasinghe et al. (historical context, updated with recent interstellar findings).

UPDATE: December 22, 2025

 Comprehensive Update on Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: Post-Earth Closest Approach on December 19, 2025

As of December 22, 2025, the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS (also designated C/2025 N1) has successfully completed its closest approach to Earth on December 19, reaching a minimum distance of approximately 1.798 astronomical units (about 269 million kilometers or 167 million miles). This distant passage posed absolutely no threat to our planet, occurring safely on the opposite side of the Sun relative to Earth at times, but allowing for excellent observational opportunities from both ground- and space-based assets. Now receding outbound on its hyperbolic trajectory, the comet is fading in brightness but continues to yield valuable data, marking a milestone in our study of material from beyond the solar system.

Discovered on July 1, 2025, by the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) telescope in Río Hurtado, Chile, 3I/ATLAS was quickly identified as the third confirmed interstellar object due to its hyperbolic orbit (eccentricity >1), indicating it is unbound to the Sun and originates from interstellar space. Pre-discovery images extend back to June 14, 2025, refining its path. The comet reached perihelion (closest to the Sun) on October 30, 2025, at about 1.4 AU, just inside Mars' orbit, where solar heating triggered significant activity.

Visibility peaked in November at magnitudes 9-12, faintly accessible with binoculars under dark skies. During its Earth approach, it resided in the constellation Leo, requiring larger telescopes (8-inch or more) for views as it dimmed to magnitude 13-15. Post-approach, it remains observable in the pre-dawn sky until spring 2026, gradually fading as it heads toward a future close pass by Jupiter in 2026.

This rare visitor has provided a treasure trove of data from coordinated observations by NASA missions (Hubble, Parker Solar Probe, Psyche, Perseverance on Mars, MAVEN, Lucy), ESA assets (XMM-Newton, XRISM collaboration, JUICE, Mars Express), and ground telescopes worldwide. Below, we delve deeply into the scientific findings, addressing the numerous claims and speculations that have surrounded 3I/ATLAS since discovery.

 Discovery and Trajectory: A True Interstellar Wanderer

The announcement of 3I/ATLAS as interstellar came swiftly after discovery, based on its inbound velocity of ~60 km/s relative to the Sun—far exceeding escape velocity. Orbital calculations confirm it entered from the direction of Sagittarius, with a trajectory tilted relative to the ecliptic plane. Estimates suggest the nucleus formed 7-14 billion years ago in the Milky Way's thick disk, a region of older, metal-poor stars, making it potentially older than our 4.6-billion-year-old solar system.

The comet's path took it past Mars at 0.194 AU on October 3, 2025 (imaged by Perseverance rover and orbiters), perihelion behind the Sun from Earth's view (filled by spacecraft like Parker Solar Probe), Venus at 0.65 AU in November, Earth at 1.8 AU on December 19, and outbound toward Jupiter at ~0.36 AU in March 2026. No dramatic alterations occurred; minor perturbations from non-gravitational effects are within expectations for an active comet.

 Addressing Anomalous Claims: Natural Explanations Prevail

3I/ATLAS has fueled speculation, including suggestions of artificial origin (e.g., ranked ~4 on Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb's scale of 0-10 for potential technosignatures, due to perceived "anomalies"). However, detailed analyses consistently attribute features to natural cometary processes.

Non-Gravitational Acceleration: Early astrometry showed small deviations (~10^{-6} to 10^{-7} m/s²), prompting headlines. This is standard for comets: asymmetric outgassing from sublimating ices (primarily CO₂, CO, and H₂O) acts like weak thrusters. Pre-perihelion residuals were near zero; post-perihelion effects align with rotational jets. No evidence for exotic propulsion.

"Rockets" or Jet-Like Features: Hubble and ground images revealed teardrop-shaped coma and tail extensions up to arcminutes long, with brightness outbursts tied to a ~15-20 hour rotation period. These are classic outburst jets from cracking ice exposing volatiles—common in comets like 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

Path Changes and "Masking" Near Jupiter/Earth Perihelion: Speculation arose that non-gravitational forces "diverted" it toward Jupiter to "hide" behind solar conjunction or Earth's January perihelion. Trajectory models show no such intent; conjunction limited Earth views during perihelion, but spacecraft compensated. Jupiter encounter is gravitational, potentially slingshotting it outbound with minor tweaks.

X-Ray Emissions: A breakthrough: First detection in an interstellar object. ESA's XMM-Newton (December 3, 20-hour observation) and Japan's XRISM (late November, 17 hours) captured soft X-rays extending ~400,000 km. This glow arises from solar wind charge exchange with cometary neutrals (C, N, O), producing characteristic lines—not artificial.

Radio Waves and "Signals": MeerKAT and other arrays detected OH radical absorption lines in October-November, misinterpreted as modulated signals. These are natural maser emissions from UV breakdown of water ice, common in comets (e.g., Halley). No artificial modulation; Breakthrough Listen searches found nothing technological.

Pulsating Behavior: Periodic brightness variations (~10-20% fluctuations) link to rotation and jet activity, not unexplained pulsing.

Consensus: 3I/ATLAS is a natural, active comet—richer in CO/CO₂ than typical solar system ones, but consistent with formation in a cold, distant protoplanetary disk.

 Composition: Rich in Volatiles and Organics

Spectroscopy (JWST, ALMA, VLT, Hubble) reveals a primitive composition:

- Dominant volatiles: CO₂, CO, with methanol (CH₃OH), HCN, and traces of H₂O vapor.

- Dust: Reddish, silicate-rich with organics.

- Nucleus size: 0.44-5.6 km diameter (Hubble estimates).

No glycine or complex amino acids detected yet, but high prebiotic potential.

 Life-Building Molecules and Panspermia Implications

While no direct biosignatures, 3I/ATLAS reinforces pseudo-panspermia: Space delivers organic precursors.

Detections include complex hydrocarbons, methanol, HCN—building blocks for amino acids, sugars. Enrichment suggests alien disk chemistry differed from ours, possibly carbon-rich.

Panspermia hypothesis: Comets seed planets with organics (pseudo-) or microbes (litho-). Extremophiles survive space; comets protect via ice. 3I/ATLAS shows interstellar medium teems with chemistry, supporting widespread prebiotic delivery. Full lithopanspermia remains speculative, but resilience studies (e.g., tardigrades, Deinococcus) bolster it.

No evidence of life on 3I/ATLAS, but it exemplifies how such material could fertilize habitable worlds.

 Observational Campaign Highlights

- Parker Solar Probe: October-November images of coma/tail.

- Hubble: Multiple views showing activity evolution.

- JUICE: November multi-instrument data (delayed downlink).

- Mars Assets: Close-up during flyby.

- Ground: Virtual Telescope Project livestreamed December 19 approach.

Ongoing: Jupiter effects in 2026; long-term fading studies.

 Future Implications

3I/ATLAS underscores interstellar objects' frequency—with surveys like Vera C. Rubin, dozens more await. It bridges solar system and exoplanet formation, hinting at universal chemistry.

In summary, this visitor—distant, ancient, active—has enriched astronomy without anomaly beyond nature's playbook.  No, it was not a spaceship or extraterrestrial probe.  

 

 Citations

1. NASA Science: Comet 3I/ATLAS Facts (2025).

2. ESA: XMM-Newton and 3I/ATLAS Observations (December 2025).

3. Wikipedia: 3I/ATLAS (updated December 2025).

4. arXiv: Orbital and Non-Gravitational Studies (2025).

5. JAXA/XRISM Reports (November-December 2025).

6. TheSkyLive/JPL Horizons: Trajectory (2025).

7. BBC Sky at Night/CNN: Visibility and Imaging (2025).

8. Panspermia Literature: Wickramasinghe et al., updated with interstellar findings (2025 context).

A Mysterious Object Near Jupiter: What Could It Be?

A Mysterious Object Near Jupiter: What Could It Be?

The vastness of space has always captivated human imagination, and few places in our solar system spark as much curiosity as Jupiter, the gas giant with its swirling storms, enigmatic moons, and immense gravitational pull. Recently, a hypothetical scenario has stirred the minds of astronomers, scientists, and space enthusiasts alike: the discovery of a spacecraft-sized object near Jupiter. But what could such an object be? Is it a natural phenomenon, a human-made artifact, or something far more extraordinary? In this exploration, we’ll dive into the possibilities, blending science, speculation, and a touch of cosmic wonder to unravel the mystery of this enigmatic object.

 Setting the Scene: Jupiter’s Cosmic Neighborhood

Jupiter, the fifth planet from the Sun, is a behemoth. With a diameter of roughly 86,881 miles (139,820 kilometers), it’s more than 11 times the size of Earth. Its powerful magnetic field and intense gravity make it a focal point for studying the dynamics of our solar system. Jupiter is surrounded by at least 95 known moons, a faint ring system, and a region teeming with asteroids and other celestial debris. The idea of a spacecraft-sized object—something roughly the size of a modern space probe or satellite, say 10 to 100 meters in length—appearing in this environment raises fascinating questions.

For context, a spacecraft-sized object could be anything from a small probe like NASA’s Voyager (about 20 meters long with its antenna) to a larger structure akin to the International Space Station (roughly 109 meters long). Such an object, detected near Jupiter, would stand out due to its size, motion, or reflective properties, especially if it doesn’t behave like a typical asteroid or comet. Let’s explore the possibilities, ranging from the mundane to the mind-bending.

 Possibility 1: A Natural Celestial Object

The most straightforward explanation for a spacecraft-sized object near Jupiter is that it’s a natural body, such as an asteroid, comet, or moonlet. Jupiter’s gravitational influence is immense, capturing countless objects into its orbit over billions of years. These objects, known as Trojan asteroids, irregular moons, or temporary satellites, often have irregular shapes and sizes that could mimic a spacecraft.

- Trojan Asteroids: Jupiter shares its orbit with thousands of Trojan asteroids, which congregate at stable gravitational points called Lagrange points (L4 and L5). Some of these asteroids are small enough to fall within the spacecraft-size range. A particularly reflective or metallic asteroid might appear artificial at first glance, especially if its surface scatters light in a way that mimics a manufactured object.

- Irregular Moons: Jupiter’s irregular moons, unlike its large Galilean moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto), are often small, captured objects with eccentric orbits. A moonlet in the 10–100-meter range could be mistaken for a spacecraft, especially if it has an unusual shape or surface composition. For example, some moons have high albedo (reflectivity), making them stand out against the backdrop of space.

- Interstellar Interlopers: The discovery of ‘Oumuamua in 2017, the first confirmed interstellar object passing through our solar system, opened the door to the possibility of extraterrestrial objects wandering near Jupiter. A spacecraft-sized interstellar asteroid or comet, caught temporarily by Jupiter’s gravity, could appear anomalous, especially if it exhibits non-gravitational acceleration (as ‘Oumuamua did, possibly due to outgassing).

While these natural explanations are the most likely, they don’t fully satisfy the imagination. A natural object would typically lack the precise structure, motion, or signals associated with a spacecraft. If the object exhibits unusual behavior—say, controlled movement or radio emissions—it pushes us toward more speculative possibilities.

 Possibility 2: Human-Made Spacecraft or Debris

Could the object be a relic of human exploration? Since the 1970s, humanity has sent several spacecraft to Jupiter, including Pioneer 10 and 11, Voyager 1 and 2, Galileo, Juno, and the more recent Europa Clipper. These missions have left behind probes, orbiters, and even fragments that could, in theory, linger in Jupiter’s vicinity.

- Known Spacecraft: Most of our Jupiter-bound spacecraft are accounted for. For example, Galileo was intentionally crashed into Jupiter in 2003 to avoid contaminating its moons, and Juno remains in orbit as of 2025. However, a malfunctioning probe or an untracked component (like a detached antenna or stage) could theoretically appear as a mysterious object. Voyager 1 and 2, now in interstellar space, passed by Jupiter decades ago, but smaller debris from their flybys could still be in the region.

- Space Debris: Space exploration generates debris, from discarded rocket stages to lost tools. While most debris remains in Earth’s orbit, some missions to the outer solar system could have left fragments that ended up near Jupiter. A reflective piece of metal, spinning in a way that catches sunlight, might resemble a spacecraft-sized object.

- Secret Missions: A more speculative angle involves classified or unannounced missions. Governments or private entities could have launched probes to Jupiter without public disclosure. For instance, a prototype spacecraft testing advanced propulsion could be mistaken for an unknown object. However, the logistics of keeping such a mission secret, especially in the era of global telescope networks, make this unlikely.

The human-made explanation falters if the object exhibits technology or behavior beyond our current capabilities, such as rapid course corrections or non-chemical propulsion. This leads us to the most tantalizing possibility: an extraterrestrial origin.

 Possibility 3: An Alien Artifact

The idea of an alien spacecraft or probe near Jupiter is the stuff of science fiction dreams, but it’s worth exploring through a scientific lens. The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) has long considered our solar system a potential target for alien exploration, and Jupiter—being a prominent and resource-rich planet—could be a logical destination for an advanced civilization’s probe.

- A Visiting Probe: An extraterrestrial probe, similar in size to our own spacecraft, could be exploring Jupiter’s system, perhaps studying its moons (Europa, with its subsurface ocean, is a prime candidate for astrobiological interest). Such a probe might emit radio signals, move in ways inconsistent with natural orbits, or reflect light in a manner suggesting a polished, artificial surface. The ‘Oumuamua debate, where some scientists (like Harvard’s Avi Loeb) proposed it could be an alien artifact, shows how such ideas gain traction when objects defy easy categorization.

- A Relic of an Ancient Civilization: Jupiter’s long history makes it a potential repository for ancient artifacts. An alien probe or structure, perhaps millions of years old, could have been captured by Jupiter’s gravity and remained dormant until detected. Such an object might resemble the monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey, a silent sentinel waiting to be discovered.

- A Megastructure Fragment: While a full-scale Dyson Sphere or megastructure is unlikely, a smaller component—say, a piece of an alien satellite or solar collector—could fit the spacecraft-size description. If it’s made of exotic materials or exhibits unusual electromagnetic properties, it could stand out starkly against Jupiter’s natural environment.

The alien hypothesis, while exciting, faces significant hurdles. The Fermi Paradox—why haven’t we seen clear evidence of extraterrestrial life?—suggests that if an alien object exists, it’s either deliberately hidden or extremely rare. Additionally, Occam’s Razor favors simpler explanations (like a natural object) unless definitive evidence, such as structured radio signals or clear artificial design, emerges.

 Possibility 4: A Novel Phenomenon or Anomaly

Beyond the categories of natural, human-made, or alien, the object could represent a phenomenon we don’t yet fully understand. Jupiter’s environment is complex, with intense magnetic fields, radiation belts, and atmospheric dynamics that could produce unusual effects.

- Plasma or Magnetic Anomaly: Jupiter’s magnetosphere, one of the largest structures in the solar system, generates powerful auroras and plasma interactions. A localized plasma phenomenon or magnetic disturbance could create a reflective or emissive “object” that appears spacecraft-sized on our instruments. For example, a concentrated plasma torus near Io might mimic a solid object under certain observational conditions.

- Exotic Matter or Particles: Theoretical physics allows for exotic objects, such as microscopic black holes, strangelets, or dark matter clumps, though these are unlikely to be spacecraft-sized. A speculative possibility is a stable, macroscopic quantum object or a remnant of some cosmic process, temporarily visible near Jupiter.

- Optical Illusion or Instrumental Error: Telescopes and space observatories, like the James Webb Space Telescope or ground-based arrays, are incredibly sensitive but not infallible. A glitch, cosmic ray hit, or misinterpretation of data could make a natural object appear artificial. For instance, a distant star’s light, refracted through Jupiter’s atmosphere, might create a fleeting, spacecraft-like signature.

These possibilities remind us that our understanding of the universe is incomplete. A mysterious object could be a clue to new physics or a reminder of the challenges in interpreting distant observations.

 How Would We Investigate?

If a spacecraft-sized object were detected near Jupiter, scientists would mobilize a multi-pronged approach to study it:

- Telescopic Observations: Ground-based telescopes, like the Very Large Telescope in Chile, and space-based observatories, like Hubble or James Webb, would analyze the object’s spectrum, reflectivity, and motion. This would help determine its composition (rocky, metallic, or exotic) and trajectory.

- Radio and Signal Analysis: SETI researchers would scan for radio emissions or other signals that might indicate artificial origin. Even weak or intermittent signals could provide clues.

- Spacecraft Flyby: If resources allow, a mission like NASA’s Juno or a future probe could be redirected for a closer look. A flyby would provide high-resolution images and data on the object’s structure and behavior.

- Modeling and Simulation: Scientists would use computer models to test whether the object’s behavior matches known natural phenomena, human technology, or something else entirely.

Public reaction would likely be intense, with social media platforms buzzing with theories ranging from aliens to secret government projects. Scientists would urge caution, emphasizing the need for rigorous analysis before jumping to conclusions.

 The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters

The discovery of a spacecraft-sized object near Jupiter would be more than a scientific curiosity—it would challenge our understanding of the universe and our place in it. A natural object would deepen our knowledge of Jupiter’s complex environment. A human-made artifact would highlight the legacy of our exploration efforts. And an alien object? That would rewrite history, confirming we’re not alone and sparking a new era of cosmic inquiry.

Jupiter, with its grandeur and mysteries, is a fitting stage for such a discovery. Its moons, like Europa and Ganymede, are prime targets in the search for life, and its vast gravitational reach makes it a natural hub for cosmic visitors, whether asteroids or something more. The object, whatever it is, would remind us that the universe is full of surprises, waiting to be explored.

 Conclusion: Embracing the Unknown

As we ponder the nature of a spacecraft-sized object near Jupiter, we’re reminded of the thrill of exploration. Whether it’s a rogue asteroid, a forgotten probe, an alien artifact, or something entirely new, the object represents the frontier of human curiosity. It challenges us to look up, to question, and to dream. As we continue to probe the mysteries of Jupiter and beyond, we may find that the answers are as awe-inspiring as the questions themselves.

What do you think this object could be? A chunk of cosmic rock, a lost piece of human ingenuity, or a beacon from another world? The universe is vast, and the possibilities are endless. Let’s keep our eyes on the skies—and our minds open to the wonders that await.

- Sources:

1. Bagenal, F. (2017). Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press.

2. Dyson, F. J. (1960). “Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation.” Science, 131(3414), 1667–1668.

3. European Space Agency (ESA). (2022). Space Debris: The Growing Threat. Retrieved from https://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris

4. European Southern Observatory (ESO). (2021). Very Large Telescope: Technical Overview. Retrieved from https://www.eso.org/sci/facilities/vlt/

5. Hawking, S. W. (1974). “Black Hole Explosions?” Nature, 248(5443), 30–31.

6. Jewitt, D. (2018). “The Trojan Asteroids: Keys to Jupiter’s Past.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 56, 137–167.

7. Loeb, A. (2021). Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

8. Meech, K. J., et al. (2017). “A Brief Visit from a Red and Extremely Elongated Interstellar Asteroid.” Nature, 552(7685), 378–381.

9. NASA. (2023). Jupiter: Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/jupiter/

10. NASA. (2024). Juno Mission Overview. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/

11. Sheppard, S. S. (2019). “The Irregular Satellites of Jupiter.” Icarus, 321, 112–124.

12. Shostak, S. (2020). Confessions of an Alien Hunter: A Scientist’s Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. National Geographic.

13. Webb, S. (2015). If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... Where Is Everybody? Springer.

Unraveling the Mystery of 3I/ATLAS: The Interstellar Object Emitting Its Own Light

Unraveling the Mystery of 3I/ATLAS: The Interstellar Object Emitting Its Own Light

In the vast expanse of the cosmos, few discoveries capture the imagination quite like the detection of an interstellar object— a visitor from beyond our solar system. On July 1, 2025, astronomers identified such an object, officially named 3I/ATLAS, marking it as only the third confirmed interstellar object to enter our cosmic neighborhood. Initially spotted by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) survey telescope in Río Hurtado, Chile, this object has since sparked intense curiosity and debate among scientists and the public alike. What sets 3I/ATLAS apart is not just its origin but a peculiar characteristic: it appears to be emitting its own light, defying conventional expectations of cometary behavior. This phenomenon, observed through NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, has led to a flurry of speculation, including provocative suggestions that it could be an alien spacecraft. Here, we delve into the details of this enigmatic object, explore possible explanations for its light emission, and critically examine the tantalizing yet contentious hypothesis of its artificial origins.

 The Discovery of 3I/ATLAS

3I/ATLAS was first detected hurtling through the solar system at a staggering speed of approximately 37 miles per second (60 km/s) relative to the Sun, following a highly eccentric, hyperbolic orbit that confirms its interstellar origin. Unlike objects born within our solar system, which typically follow elliptical orbits, 3I/ATLAS’s trajectory suggests it hails from another star system, making it a rare and valuable subject of study. Initially dubbed A11pl3Z, the object was later given the designation 3I/ATLAS, with an additional cometary name, C/2025 N1, after tentative signs of cometary activity were observed, such as a marginal coma (a hazy cloud of gas and dust) and a short tail.

The object’s size has been a point of contention. Early estimates suggested it could be as large as 12 miles (20 km) in diameter—larger than the asteroid that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs. However, more recent analyses, particularly those proposed by Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, suggest it might be significantly smaller, potentially aligning with the sizes of the two previously discovered interstellar objects, ‘Oumuamua (115–400 meters long) and 2I/Borisov (approximately 1 km in diameter). This discrepancy in size estimates underscores the challenges in studying such distant and unfamiliar objects.

The most striking feature of 3I/ATLAS, however, came to light through observations made by the Hubble Space Telescope on July 21, 2025. Unlike typical comets, which glow due to sunlight reflecting off their dust and gas, 3I/ATLAS exhibits a localized glow on its Sun-facing side, resembling a focused emission rather than a uniform scattering of light. This anomaly has baffled scientists and prompted a range of hypotheses, from natural phenomena to the extraordinary possibility of extraterrestrial technology.

 Possible Explanations for the Light Emission

The glow of 3I/ATLAS has become the focal point of scientific inquiry, as it deviates from the expected behavior of comets or asteroids. Several natural explanations have been proposed to account for this phenomenon, each grounded in known astrophysical processes but challenged by the object’s unique characteristics.

1. Cometary Activity with Unusual Dust Dynamics  

   The prevailing theory among astronomers is that 3I/ATLAS is a comet, with its glow attributed to a coma of dust and gas released as it approaches the Sun. When a comet nears the Sun, solar heating causes its icy surface to sublimate, releasing gas and dust that reflect sunlight, creating a visible glow. In the case of 3I/ATLAS, the glow appears concentrated on the Sun-facing side, which could suggest dust being preferentially ejected from that region due to solar heating. However, the sharpness of the brightness drop-off with distance from the object’s core is unusual. Typical comets exhibit a more gradual decrease in brightness, as their dust scatters sunlight more uniformly. This discrepancy has led some to question whether the glow is purely reflective or indicative of another process.

2. Radioactive Material from a Supernova Fragment  

   Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has proposed an alternative natural explanation: 3I/ATLAS could be a rare fragment from the core of a nearby supernova, rich in radioactive material. Such a fragment could emit radiation, producing a glow independent of solar reflection. This hypothesis would account for the object’s ability to “generate its own light,” as the emitted radiation could excite surrounding dust or gas, creating a visible glow. However, Loeb himself deems this scenario “highly unlikely,” as the probability of such a fragment entering our solar system and exhibiting these specific characteristics is extraordinarily low. The composition required for sustained radioactive emission would also need to be exceptionally rare and stable over interstellar distances, further complicating this explanation.

3. Surface Heating and Dust Emission  

   Another possibility is that the glow results from intense solar heating of the object’s surface, causing dust to be ejected in a manner that creates a localized glow. This could occur if 3I/ATLAS has an unusual surface composition or structure that responds differently to solar radiation than typical comets. For instance, a highly reflective or metallic surface could enhance the brightness of the emitted dust, creating the observed effect. However, this theory struggles to explain the absence of a prominent cometary tail, which is typically seen in comets as dust and gas are blown away from the Sun by solar wind. The lack of such a tail in 3I/ATLAS undermines the comet hypothesis and fuels speculation about alternative origins.

4. Water Venting in Deep Space  

   A recent peer-reviewed study noted the detection of OH (hydroxyl) emission from 3I/ATLAS at a distance of 3.5 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, suggesting the object is venting water vapor. This is unusual, as comets typically begin outgassing closer to the Sun (around 2 AU or less) due to solar heating. The early onset of water venting could indicate an unusually volatile composition or an internal heat source, which might contribute to the observed glow. However, this observation does not fully account for the localized nature of the light emission or the lack of a typical cometary tail.

 The Alien Vessel Hypothesis

The most provocative hypothesis, championed by Avi Loeb, is that 3I/ATLAS could be an artificial object—a spacecraft powered by nuclear energy or another advanced propulsion system. This idea stems from several anomalous features of the object, including its light emission, unusual trajectory, and lack of a prominent cometary tail. Let’s explore the arguments for and against this extraordinary claim.

 Arguments Supporting an Alien Vessel

- Unusual Light Emission: The localized glow on the Sun-facing side, as observed by Hubble, resembles the effect of a directed light source, akin to a vehicle’s headlights. Loeb suggests this could result from an artificial energy source, such as nuclear power, illuminating dust accumulated on the object’s surface during its interstellar journey. The sharp drop-off in brightness, unlike the diffuse glow of comets, supports the idea of a non-natural light source.

- Suspicious Trajectory: 3I/ATLAS follows a trajectory that allows for close flybys of both Earth and Jupiter, which Loeb argues could indicate a deliberate course for reconnaissance. The object’s path enables efficient planetary intercepts with minimal velocity changes, a hallmark of optimized spacecraft trajectories. This alignment has led Loeb to propose that 3I/ATLAS could be a “mothership” releasing smaller probes to study our solar system.

- Lack of Cometary Features: Unlike typical comets, 3I/ATLAS lacks a bright, elongated tail, which is expected when solar wind blows dust and gas away from a comet’s nucleus. This absence, combined with its high speed and interstellar origin, aligns with the characteristics of ‘Oumuamua, another interstellar object Loeb has suggested might be artificial.

- Historical Precedent: Loeb points to humanity’s own interstellar probes, such as Voyager 1 and 2, which have exited our solar system. If advanced civilizations exist elsewhere in the galaxy, it’s plausible they could send similar probes, potentially equipped with nuclear power or other technologies capable of producing light.

- Loeb’s Scale: Loeb has proposed a “Loeb Scale” for interstellar objects, ranging from 0 (definitely natural) to 10 (definitely technological). He currently rates 3I/ATLAS a 6, reflecting his openness to the possibility of artificial origins while acknowledging the need for further evidence.

 Arguments Against an Alien Vessel

- Lack of Direct Evidence: The alien vessel hypothesis relies heavily on speculative interpretation rather than concrete evidence. No artificial signals, such as radio waves or structured emissions, have been detected from 3I/ATLAS. The glow, while unusual, can still be explained by natural processes like dust emission or internal heating, even if these are not fully understood.

- Cometary Activity Observed: The detection of OH emission and tentative signs of a coma and short tail support the comet hypothesis. These features, reported by the Minor Planet Center, suggest that 3I/ATLAS is behaving like a comet, albeit an unusual one. The water venting at 3.5 AU, while early, is not unprecedented and could be explained by a unique composition or structure.

- Occam’s Razor: The principle of Occam’s Razor favors simpler explanations when evidence is inconclusive. A natural object, such as a comet or asteroid with unusual properties, is a more parsimonious explanation than an extraterrestrial spacecraft, which would require a series of extraordinary assumptions about alien technology and motives.

- Size and Feasibility: If 3I/ATLAS is indeed 12 miles long, as some estimates suggest, it would be an implausible size for a spacecraft, far exceeding the scale of any known human-built probe. Even if smaller, as Loeb proposes, the energy requirements for a nuclear-powered craft to emit detectable light across millions of miles are immense and speculative.

- Skepticism from the Scientific Community: While Loeb’s ideas generate significant attention, many astronomers argue that 3I/ATLAS is likely a natural object, possibly a comet with atypical properties. The consensus leans toward refining our understanding of interstellar comets rather than invoking extraterrestrial technology without stronger evidence.

 Why the Debate Matters

The debate over 3I/ATLAS’s nature is more than an academic exercise; it touches on fundamental questions about our place in the universe. If the object is a natural comet or asteroid, it offers a rare opportunity to study material from another star system, potentially revealing insights into the formation of distant planetary systems. If, however unlikely, it is an artificial object, the implications would be profound, confirming the existence of advanced extraterrestrial civilizations and prompting a reevaluation of humanity’s technological and philosophical frameworks.

The upcoming close approach of 3I/ATLAS to Mars in the fall of 2025, followed by its closest pass to Earth on December 17, 2025, at a safe distance of at least 1.6 astronomical units (about 150 million miles), provides a critical window for further observations. NASA and other space agencies could leverage existing spacecraft, such as those orbiting Mars, to capture high-resolution images or spectral data, shedding light on the object’s composition and behavior. Loeb has advocated for such missions, arguing that a closer look could resolve the mystery.

 Public and Scientific Sentiment

The discovery of 3I/ATLAS has ignited public imagination, with social media platforms buzzing about the possibility of an alien probe. Posts on X reflect a mix of excitement and skepticism, with some users echoing Loeb’s speculative theories while others emphasize the need for caution and further data. The scientific community, while intrigued, remains cautious, with experts like Dr. Mark Norris of the University of Central Lancashire noting that interstellar objects like 3I/ATLAS provide evidence that such “wanderers” are relatively common in our galaxy, regardless of their nature.

 Conclusion

The mystery of 3I/ATLAS underscores the allure and complexity of exploring the unknown. Its light emission, unusual trajectory, and lack of typical cometary features challenge our understanding of interstellar objects, inviting both rigorous scientific inquiry and bold speculation. While natural explanations—such as cometary activity, unusual dust dynamics, or rare radioactive compositions—are currently more plausible, the possibility of an artificial origin, though unlikely, cannot be entirely dismissed without further evidence. As 3I/ATLAS approaches Mars and Earth, the global scientific community has a unique opportunity to unravel its secrets, potentially reshaping our understanding of the cosmos. Whether it proves to be a natural wonder or something far more extraordinary, 3I/ATLAS reminds us of the boundless mysteries awaiting discovery beyond our solar system.

UPDATE: September 8, 2025.

Here is a new image of 3I/ATLAS

New photos of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS reveal its tail growing before our eyes

Sources:  

 Futurism - Mysterious Object Hurtling Toward Us From Beyond Solar System Appears to Be Emitting Its Own Light, Scientists Find  [](https://futurism.com/interstellar-object-light)

 Daily Mail Online - Scientists baffled as mysterious interstellar object produces its own light... defying comet theory  [](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15011691/interstellar-object-atlas-producing-light-comet.html?ito=1490&ns_campaign=1490&ns_mchannel=rss)

 NewsBreak - Scientists baffled as mysterious interstellar object produces its own light... defying comet theory  [](https://www.newsbreak.com/daily-mail-560402/4182146131816-scientists-baffled-as-mysterious-interstellar-object-produces-its-own-light-defying-comet-theory)

 Indy100 - A bizarre 'glowing' object is baffling scientists - and it’s hurtling towards Earth  [](https://www.indy100.com/science-tech/interstellar-object-solar-system-emitting-light-astronomers-debate)

 The Guardian - Scientists spot mystery object believed to come from beyond solar system  [](https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/03/nasa-interstellar-comet-solar-system-a11pl3z-3i-atlas)

 @UAPWatchers - 3I/ATLAS Is Leaking Water In Deep Space And It's Not Supposed To  

 @MarioNawfal - HARVARD SCIENTIST SAYS INTERSTELLAR OBJECT COULD BE ALIEN PROBE  

 

Cigar Looking Asteroid from another Star System Visits Earth

The Universe is full of a lot of interesting and fascinating things. We are always discovering new things about it.  Its immense size will always keep us curious. This is because the possibility of finding new things is nearly infinite due to the universe's size. We are just scratching the surface in regards to space exploration and scanning the cosmos. There is still a lot to learn. 

Well, recently we were visited by an asteroid from another solar system. It is possibly the first object in space that is not native to our own solar system. This fact alone is interesting but there is another fact that has astronomers surprised. This asteroid is extremely strange. It is cigar-shaped and traveling extremely fast at about 85,000 miles per hour and is 124 million miles away from the Earth. The asteroid is rocky and has a reddish hue.  Scientists named it "Oumuamua." The word is Hawaiian and means "A messenger from afar arriving first."

Scientists are trying to learn as much about it as possible.  However, it will not be in our solar system for long.  It is scheduled to pass by Jupiter in May of next year, Saturn in 2019 and eventually leave our solar system and travel to the constellation of Pegasus.  Studying this asteroid may give us more information about other systems and how they formed.  It may also have clues as to whether life exists elsewhere in the universe. 





Source:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/solar-system-s-first-interstellar-visitor-dazzles-scientists

https://newspuddle.com/first-observed-interstellar-object-is-a-speedy-cigar-shaped-asteroid/

https://www.inverse.com/article/38626-nasa-interstellar-visitor-oumuamua

Planet Nine in Solar System?

Evidence seems to point to an undiscovered planet beyond the demoted planet Pluto.  Caltech researchers believe there is a giant planet which orbits 20 times farther than the and takes about 20,000 years to make a full revolution. The planet is believed to be 10 times the size of Earth.  Dr Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown used mathematical modeling and simulations to make the discovery. However, no empirical evidence has been presented that shows the planet in it natural form.  The news was revealed in The Astronomical Journal: Evidence For A Distant Giant Planet In The Solar System

Some astronomers believe Pluto may be a satellite or former satellite of this newly discovered planet. For centuries, cultures have speculated that a large planet existed outside of the visible Solar System. This object has been called 'Nibiru' or 'Planet X.'  Ideas have circulated that ancient aliens live on this planet and visited Earth when their planet was closer to the Sun. These ideas are of course part of the human imagination and no evidence exists supporting the stories. However, this will not stop so-called 'Ancient Astronaut Theorists' from taking this news story and running to the wind with it.

In any event, the discover is amazing and shows how little we know of our own 'backyard,' the Solar System.

   





Source:

https://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523

http://mediaassets.caltech.edu/documents/45-p9_kbo_extras_orbits_2_.jpg


http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system

https://amp.twimg.com/v/6bad722e-9a4c-46aa-b0fc-7a189bd74dd9

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/science/article/Discovery-of-Planet-9-Nibiru-will-make-people-6773016.php

http://time.com/4184942/planet-9-new-pluto-solar-system/

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/planet-nine-evidence-grows-for-1347529463955510.html

New Horizons gets closer to Pluto & Charon

We are making history now.  For the first time we are seeing the "dwarf" planet Pluto and its moon Charon in high definition. Photographs from the past were pixelated and pretty much useless in regards to seeing the terrain of this alien icy world.  Thanks to NASA's New Horizons probe which was launched on January 19, 2006, we are not getting beautiful images of Pluto and Charon.

New Horizons is inching close and closer traveling at around 40,000 MPH sending us amazing photos. It is set to get near Pluto at around 6,300 miles which will provide photos of the surface similar to that of Google map's photos of the island of Manhattan.  The probe is about the size of a piano and weighs a ton.  So far, we see Pluto is in, fact small. Its moon Charon is about 25% the size of Pluto. New Horizons was able to capture Charon orbiting Pluto causing a "wobble" as the two wrestle with each other's gravitational pulls.

IN the images we have received so far, Pluto looks like a tan color. It has complex geological features, some of which look like a giant heart and whale. There is so much we can learn as New Horizons gets close. This is an exciting time for humanity. Some speculate that Pluto may be the moon of another larger planet.  We are not sure, but so far it looks like Pluto is not influenced by any other larger structure.  Here are some photos New Horizons has sent us.

Source:

http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/pluto-and-charon-new-horizons-dynamic-duo

Pluto & Charon in Color

NASA's probe, "New Horizons" has is on a mission to study the demoted planet Pluto and its moons.  It is about three months from sending us close up images of the dwarf planet and its satellites. However, it has sent us a tease of the dwarf planet and its moon Charon.  This image is the first color image of the dwarf planet and its moon.  Previous images were in black and white.

This new image is making scientists and other science enthusiasts excited about what is to come. The image was taken at about 72 million miles.  As New Horizons approaches the dwarf planet, it will take high-resolution photos of about 400 meters per pixel as it travels 30,000 mph.  These images are the equivalent of Google maps satellite images. Finally, we will get to learn more of this mysterious icy world that was once a planet.  Some astronomers theorize that Pluto may be in fact the moon of a larger planet.  This flyby and its data will hopefully clear things up regarding this hypothesis.


NASA Tweeted this:

First color image of #Pluto and Charon from @NASANewHorizons, thanks to the Ralph camera! http://t.co/eO7DjqL2Oh pic.twitter.com/kFDvdK9ydM
— NASA New Horizons (@NASANewHorizons) April 14, 2015

Source:

http://time.com/3822294/pluto-first-color-image-nasa-new-horizons-charon/

http://www.wfla.com/story/28812196/new-horizons-probe-dishes-up-its-first-color-view-of-pluto-and-charon

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/15/tech/pluto-nasa-new-horizons-first-color-picture/index.html?sr=fb041515pluto1030aStoryLink

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/new-horizons-probe-dishes-colorful-view-pluto-n341606

http://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/april/nasa-s-new-horizons-spacecraft-nears-historic-july-14-encounter-with-pluto/index.html?linkId=13549574

Alien Star Passed by Solar System

When our ancestors first began to leave the "Garden of Eden" or Africa, a star passed near our Solar System about 70,000 years ago.  Astronomers at the University of Rochester claim in a new study that Scholz's star along with a brown dwarf flew by the edge of the Solar System in the Oort Cloud. The star's gravity is so weak that it had little effect on nearby comets. It is believed that Scholz's star was about 0.8 light years from the Sun.  It is now long gone at about 20 light years away.

The European Souther Observatory used Scholz's star's radial velocity using Doppler shift which is a way of detecting the speed of light spectrums in relation to the rest of space. With this method, scientist Valentin Ivanov determined that Scholz's star did, in fact, pass by our Solar System and that it is moving away from it at an extraordinary speed at about 55 miles a second.  Scholz's star is considered a rogue star since it is moving through space without and gravitational hold in one location.  However, some questions still remain.  Why did it fly by our Solar System? What caused it to form this trajectory?  Where did it originate from?







Source:

http://iopscience.iop.org/2041-8205/800/1/L17

http://www.universetoday.com/119038/a-star-passed-through-the-solar-system-just-70000-years-ago/

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31519875

http://www.space.com/28611-star-flew-through-solar-system.html

http://www.iflscience.com/space/star-passed-less-light-year-earth

Methane on Mars

NASA's Curiosity rover has detected high levels of methane which is an organic compound. The discovery is interesting because it may indicated that life either may have existed on Mar or is still there.

However, indications show that this is a temporary phenomenon that may find an explanation in a natural process instead of life itself. The methane may be the result of serpentinisation which is a process where high temperatures cause minerals in rocks to blend with water creating methane.

However, there is also the possibility of methane originating from life such as bacteria.  Most of the methane found Earth originates from microbes who release it in flatulence. This is where human flatulence also originates from as flora and other bacteria in the human intestines aid in digesting food.  More research needs to be done in order to rule out natural processes.  To date, no evidence of microbes have been discovered, so this is why NASA cannot jump to conclusions in regards to declaring that life once existed or does exist on Mars.

In jest, perhaps Martians left behind latrines which got buried a long time ago, or maybe they are underground suffering from gas. :)

Source:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4413

http://www.aol.com/article/2014/12/16/curiosity-rover-detects-spikes-of-methane-at-mars/21117342/

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30456664

Organic Molecules Found on 67P

After analyzing data from Philae, scientists at the European Space Agency have detected what appears to be organic molecules on the coment 67P or Churyumov-Gerasimenko. This is a good sign because organic molecules are part of the building block of carbon based life.  However. this doesn't mean that Philae found life there or anything similar.

An organic molecule has one or more carbon atoms within its structure. While carbon atoms are necessary for life as we know it, many more organic molecules and compounds must be present in order to be considered life.  Methane is an example of an organic compound.  It has several hydrogen atoms that are attached to a carbon atom.  Most likely the molecules detected are methane or methanol.  If so, then these compounds would not have any relevance on how life formed on Earth. A more significant find would be that of amino acids.

Nevertheless, the search continues on. Many scientists theorize that comets brought to Earth the compounds needed to allow life to evolve and form in the complex manner that it exists today.  So far we know that comet 67p is mostly ice with a cover of dust and rock material similar to that of sandstone. Due to the extreme low temperature of the comet in the outer solar system, the ice is extremely solid.







Source:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30097648

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2014/11/18/no-its-not-a-big-deal-that-philae-found-organic-molecules-on-a-comet/

http://www.popularmechanics.com/how-to/blog/why-you-shouldnt-get-too-excited-philae-organic-molecules-comet-rosetta-17441477