Showing posts with label Punishment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Punishment. Show all posts

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Taking Family to Court

Navigating the Storm: Taking Family to Court, Seeking Justice, and Fostering Peace

Family is often seen as a sanctuary—a place of love, support, and unbreakable bonds. Yet, for many, family can also be a source of deep conflict, betrayal, and pain. When disputes escalate to the point of legal action, the decision to take family to court can feel like a seismic fracture in the foundation of those relationships. The drama and conflicts that arise in these situations are complex, emotionally charged, and fraught with moral dilemmas. This blog post explores the dynamics of taking family to court, the necessity of justice, the importance of correcting harmful behaviors, and the delicate balance of fostering mercy and peace in the aftermath.


The Painful Decision to Take Family to Court

The choice to pursue legal action against a family member is rarely made lightly. It often comes after years of unresolved conflicts, broken trust, or egregious wrongs that can no longer be ignored. Whether it’s a dispute over inheritance, allegations of abuse, financial fraud, or neglect, the decision to involve the legal system signals that all other avenues—communication, mediation, or forgiveness—have been exhausted or deemed insufficient.

The emotional toll of this decision cannot be overstated. Families are bound by shared history, memories, and often love, even when relationships are strained. Taking a sibling, parent, or child to court can feel like a betrayal of those bonds, even if the action is justified. The person initiating the lawsuit may grapple with guilt, fear of judgment from other relatives, or the dread of permanently severing ties. Meanwhile, the accused family member may feel attacked, betrayed, or unfairly targeted, leading to defensiveness and further escalation.

For example, consider a scenario where siblings are embroiled in a dispute over their late parents’ estate. One sibling believes another has manipulated the will or mismanaged funds, leading to a lawsuit. The courtroom becomes a battleground where old wounds—favoritism, jealousy, or past betrayals—are reopened. The drama unfolds not just in legal filings but in heated phone calls, tense family gatherings, and whispered gossip among relatives. The conflict can ripple outward, forcing other family members to take sides, creating factions and deepening divisions.


The Roots of Family Conflict

Family disputes that escalate to legal action often stem from deeper, longstanding issues. These conflicts are rarely about one isolated incident but rather a culmination of unresolved grievances. Common triggers include:


- Inheritance and Financial Disputes: Money is a frequent flashpoint. Disagreements over wills, trusts, or property distribution can unearth feelings of entitlement, favoritism, or greed. A sibling who feels cheated out of their “fair share” may pursue legal action, believing it’s the only way to rectify the injustice.

  - Abuse or Neglect: Allegations of physical, emotional, or financial abuse can lead to court cases, particularly when vulnerable family members, such as children or the elderly, are involved. These cases are especially painful because they expose private, often hidden, family dysfunction to public scrutiny.

- Business Disputes: When families run businesses together, conflicts over management, profits, or roles can spill into the courtroom. These disputes often blend personal and professional grievances, making resolution even more complex.

- Divorce and Custody Battles: Family court is a common arena for disputes between ex-spouses or partners, but extended family members—grandparents, aunts, or uncles—may also become entangled in legal battles over custody or visitation rights.

At the heart of these conflicts is often a breakdown in communication and trust. Families may avoid addressing issues directly, allowing resentment to fester until it erupts into a legal confrontation. Cultural expectations of loyalty and “keeping things in the family” can exacerbate the problem, as individuals feel pressured to tolerate harmful behavior rather than confront it.


The Necessity of Justice

Taking a family member to court is often an act of seeking justice—a way to hold someone accountable for their actions and to protect oneself or others from further harm. Justice is essential because it establishes boundaries, upholds fairness, and ensures that wrongs are addressed. Without justice, harmful behaviors can persist unchecked, perpetuating cycles of pain and dysfunction.

For instance, in cases of financial exploitation—such as a family member draining a shared bank account or forging signatures on legal documents—legal action may be the only way to recover losses and prevent future violations. Similarly, in situations involving abuse or neglect, court intervention can provide protection, whether through restraining orders, custody arrangements, or criminal charges. These measures are not just punitive; they are corrective, signaling that certain behaviors are unacceptable and must stop.

However, justice in the family context is rarely black-and-white. The legal system is designed to adjudicate facts and enforce laws, but it often struggles to address the emotional and relational complexities of family disputes. A court ruling may resolve a financial dispute or award custody, but it cannot heal the underlying wounds or restore trust. Moreover, the adversarial nature of litigation can deepen animosity, making reconciliation even more challenging.


Correcting Harmful Behaviors

One of the core purposes of pursuing justice is to correct harmful behaviors. Excusing or ignoring wrongs—whether out of loyalty, fear, or a desire to avoid conflict—can enable destructive patterns to continue. For example, a family member who repeatedly borrows money without repaying it may need to face legal consequences to understand the seriousness of their actions. Similarly, in cases of abuse, court-ordered interventions like therapy or restraining orders can serve as a wake-up call, prompting the offender to seek help or change their behavior.

Correcting harmful behaviors requires clarity and courage. It means acknowledging that love for a family member does not mean tolerating their harmful actions. It also means recognizing that accountability is not the same as punishment. A lawsuit or legal intervention can be a tool for setting boundaries and encouraging change, rather than simply seeking retribution.

However, correction is not guaranteed. Some family members may double down on their behavior, refusing to acknowledge their wrongs or take responsibility. In such cases, the pursuit of justice may lead to a permanent estrangement—a painful but sometimes necessary outcome to protect one’s well-being.


The Drama of Family Court

The courtroom is a stage where family drama is laid bare. Legal proceedings amplify emotions, as private grievances are aired in a public forum. Lawyers may highlight the most damning evidence, witnesses may reveal long-held secrets, and judges may issue rulings that feel like a judgment on the family itself. For those involved, the experience can be humiliating, exhausting, and deeply divisive.

The drama is not confined to the courtroom. Family members not directly involved in the lawsuit may feel compelled to weigh in, offering unsolicited advice or choosing sides. Social media can exacerbate the conflict, with relatives venting frustrations or rallying support online. Posts on platforms like X may reveal the raw emotions at play—anger, hurt, or pleas for understanding—further complicating the family dynamic.

For example, a 2023 post on X described a woman suing her brother for mismanaging their parents’ estate, lamenting how the lawsuit had “torn the family apart.” Responses ranged from sympathy to criticism, with some urging her to “let it go” for the sake of peace, while others supported her pursuit of justice. This public airing of grievances illustrates how family disputes can spill into broader social arenas, amplifying the drama and stakes.


Balancing Justice with Mercy

The pursuit of justice does not preclude mercy. In fact, true peace within a family often requires both. Justice ensures that wrongs are addressed and boundaries are set, but mercy allows for healing and the possibility of reconciliation. This balance is delicate and highly individual, depending on the nature of the conflict and the willingness of those involved to repair the relationship.

Mercy in this context does not mean excusing harmful behavior or forgoing accountability. Instead, it means approaching the situation with empathy, recognizing that family members are human, flawed, and often acting out of their own pain or limitations. For example, a sibling who mismanaged an estate may have done so out of desperation or ignorance rather than malice. Understanding their motivations can open the door to forgiveness, even as legal consequences are enforced.

Fostering mercy also involves self-reflection. The person pursuing legal action must examine their own motives—whether they seek justice for the sake of fairness or out of anger and vengeance. Honest introspection can help ensure that the pursuit of justice serves a constructive purpose, rather than fueling a cycle of retaliation.


Pathways to Peace

Peace in the aftermath of a family lawsuit is not guaranteed, but it is possible. The process begins with acknowledging that peace does not mean returning to the way things were. Instead, it means finding a new equilibrium—one that respects boundaries, acknowledges past wrongs, and allows for healing where possible.

Here are some steps families can take to move toward peace:

1. Open Communication: If possible, create space for honest, non-confrontational dialogue. Mediation or family therapy can provide a neutral setting to airing grievances and work toward understanding.

2. Set Clear Boundaries: Legal action often establishes boundaries, but families must maintain them after the case is resolved. This might mean limiting contact with a toxic family member or agreeing on clear rules for future interactions.

3. Seek Professional Support: Therapists, counselors, or mediators can help families navigate the emotional fallout of a lawsuit. They can also guide individuals in processing their own feelings of anger, guilt, or grief.

4. Practice Forgiveness: Forgiveness does not mean condoning harmful actions; it means releasing the emotional burden of resentment. This can be a personal choice, even if reconciliation with the other party is not possible.

5. Focus on the Future: While the past cannot be undone, families can choose to focus on building healthier relationships moving forward. This might involve creating new traditions, prioritizing mutual respect, or letting go of unrealistic expectations.


The Role of Community and Faith

For many, community and faith play a vital role in navigating family conflicts and legal battles. Support from friends, extended family, or religious communities can provide emotional strength and perspective. Faith traditions often emphasize both justice and mercy, offering guidance on how to balance accountability with compassion. For example, many spiritual teachings advocate for holding wrongdoers accountable while leaving room for redemption—a principle that can guide families through the turmoil of legal disputes.


 Conclusion

Taking a family member to court is one of the most challenging decisions anyone can face. It is a journey fraught with drama, conflict, and emotional upheaval. Yet, it is also an opportunity to seek justice, correct harmful behaviors, and lay the groundwork for peace. While the legal system can provide resolution, true healing requires a commitment to mercy, self-reflection, and the courage to redefine family relationships on healthier terms.

There can be no peace without justice, but justice without mercy risks perpetuating division. By holding family members accountable while fostering empathy and forgiveness, it is possible to navigate the storm of family conflict and emerge with a sense of closure, if not complete reconciliation. The path is never easy, but it is one worth walking for the sake of truth, healing, and the hope of a more peaceful future.

Monday, November 27, 2023

Pope Francis To Take Away Cardinal Burke's Salary & Flat

Pope Francis takes away Cardinal Burke's apartment and salary

In a surprising move, Pope Francis has decided to punish one of his most vocal critics, Cardinal Raymond Burke, by revoking his right to a subsidized Vatican apartment and salary.

According to various sources, Pope Francis announced his decision at a meeting of the heads of Vatican offices on Nov. 20, where he accused Burke of being a source of "disunity" in the church and of using his privileges as a retired cardinal against the church. The pope reportedly said that Burke was his "enemy" and that he would take away his apartment and salary.

Burke, a 75-year-old canon lawyer who was once the head of the Vatican's highest court, has become one of the most outspoken opponents of Pope Francis' reforms and outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics. He has repeatedly questioned the pope's teachings on divorce, remarriage, synodality, blessings for same-sex couples, women's ordination and sacramental absolution. He has also organized and participated in conferences and events that challenge the pope's vision and authority.

Burke has defended his actions as being loyal to the church and the papacy, saying that he had a duty as a cardinal and bishop to uphold the church's doctrine and correct errors. He has also claimed that he was not acting out of personal animosity or ambition, but out of love for the truth and the salvation of souls.

However, Pope Francis apparently did not see it that way. He has decided to strip Burke of his privileges as a retired cardinal, which include living in a Vatican-owned apartment near St. Peter's Square and receiving a monthly salary from the Holy See. These privileges are usually granted to cardinals who have served the church with distinction and honor, and who continue to assist the pope with their prayers and counsel.

By taking away these privileges, Pope Francis is sending a clear message that he does not tolerate dissent or division within the church, especially from those who hold high-ranking positions. He is also showing that he is willing to use his authority to discipline those who undermine his reform project and pastoral approach.

This is not the first time that Pope Francis has clashed with Burke. In 2014, he removed him from his post as prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and appointed him as patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, a largely ceremonial role. In 2016, he restricted his involvement in the order after a dispute over a condom scandal. In 2020, he replaced him with another cardinal as patron of the order. And in June this year, he accepted his resignation as patron upon reaching the age limit of 75.

Burke has not received any official notification of the pope's measures against him, according to his secretary. The Vatican's spokesman did not confirm or deny the reports, but referred questions to Burke himself.

What do you think? Post your comment below on Disqus.  Be sure to follow the rules so your comment can go through.  



Sources:


- [Pope Francis reportedly takes Vatican apartment, salary from Cardinal Burke | Catholic News Agency](https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256120/pope-francis-reportedly-takes-apartment-salary-from-cardinal-burke)

- [Pope Francis punishes Cardinal Burke, revokes Vatican apartment and salary | America Magazine](https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2023/11/28/pope-francis-cardinal-burke-punish-246596)

- [Pope planning to withdraw Cardinal Burke's Vatican salary, sources say ...](https://www.franciscanmedia.org/news-commentary/pope-planning-to-withdraw-cardinal-burkes-vatican-salary-sources-say/)

- [Pope Francis Meets With Cardinal Burke Amid Salary, Apartment ...](https://www.ncregister.com/cna/pope-francis-meets-with-cardinal-burke-amid-salary-apartment-controversy)

- [Pope reportedly confirms he is taking away Burke’s apartment, denies ...](https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256141/pope-reportedly-confirms-he-is-taking-away-burke-s-apartment-denies-calling-him-his-enemy)

Sunday, January 24, 2021

3rd Sunday in Ordinary Time - Repent and Come Follow Me

Today's readings call us to repentance.

In the first reading from the book of Jonah, the word of the Lord God sends Jonah to Nineveh.  There, he is to go warn the people that God would destroy the city if they do not change their ways.  We are told that he took 3 days to do this and that in forty days if they did not heed the warning, Nineveh would be destroyed. 

In the Bible, numbers do not necessarily represent numerical value in the mathematical sense.  They are part of a symbolic system called the gematria. Each number represents something. The number 3 represents totality or completeness.  It is used over 400 times throughout the Sacred Scriptures.  The forty days means a long period or a period of preparation or transition. Nineveh was a city that had it all in regards to sin.  We read more details in Nahum 3.

In this city, thievery is rampant, sexual licentiousness, drunkenness, death, merciless killing, etc. Notice how God gives a warning before He acts.  He sends out Jonah to warn the people. Atheists often like to make claims that the "Old Testament God" is this evil deity who is sadistic and enjoys killing or having others kill in His name.  This is far from the truth and a poor understanding of literary genres in Sacred Scripture. If God was this "evil deity" that did not care, why would He send out Jonah to warn the residents of Nineveh?  Here we see that God is not only just, but merciful (Psalm 86:5Psalm 145:9Ephesians 2:4).  He prefers all be saved than destroyed just like any responsible father would not sit back and let his kids do whatever they want.  A father sets rules and enforces them justly.  This is love.  

Today, we are facing an alleged pandemic with the covid-19 coronavirus.  Some believe this is a punishment or chastisement from God.  I will not say either way, but it does seem weird how this virus appeared out of nowhere and seems to be altering itself to face our "defenses."  The virus is now becoming more contagious even to the point that more layers are needed in regards to masks. Some scientists are claiming that we should were at least two masks, one over another.  Vaccines were rushed into production and were given emergency approval, but are not approved by the FDA. These vaccines themselves are believed to prevent contracting the virus and/or limiting the symptoms. Even these claims are hypothetical since not enough time was given to study them. The whole thing just seems strange. It is like this virus is "intelligent" and knows what we are doing to combat it and is evolving to meet the challenge.  Is this the wrath of God or nature just trying to reduce the human population?  Is this a biological weapon or a simple mishap in a lap with bats infected with covid-19?  We cannot know for sure.  All I can say is that this virus has literally put humanity on its knees. Despite churches closing, faith still increased.  People seem to want God more than before.  Is God calling us via this alleged pandemic?  We must test the spirit of the times and see.  We must pray and ask God to enlighten us.  

The responsorial Psalm responds to the first reading with the statement: "Teach me your ways, O Lord." What does this mean?  Well once we repent of our sins and commit to change, then we must learn how to do so. Simply repenting is not going to show us how to continue on the path to holiness. Only God can teach us this since He is perfection (2 Samuel 22:31Psalm 18:30Matthew 5:48).  We must not become like those in this world blindly following the next fad or chic idea.  We must challenge them and focus on Christ and His will for us. 

In the second reading, we are reminded that time is running out. We are told by St. Paul to behave as such we are not living our daily lives on Earth. In other words, we must not focus too much on the things of this world, for they will pass. Our world will pass.  Science even agrees with this statement. However, this does not mean all life will disappear with it, nor are some going to go floating in the air in some "rapture."  Rather, God will return like a "thief in the night" and will judge us all (1 Thessalonians 5:2).  We will be judged based on how we loved God and others (Matthew 7:2).  This means we are to love God above things and our neighbor as ourselves (Luke 10:27).  We must not love God only on Sundays and Holy Days, but all the time.  This applies to our neighbors as well. We must not love them only during Mass, but all the time; yes, including those who get on our nerves (Matthew 5:44). We must teach our neighbors the truth and not water it down because it may offend their sensibilities (John 17:17).  It would be a sin against charity to lead others to believe that abortion is moral, that same-sex union is love and valid, that contraception is ethical, or that we should mind our own business and not admonish the sinner so as not to offend them. 

A new president was just inaugurated and while he calls himself Catholic, his views do not match our faith. He recently made statements showing his drive to keep abortion legal and propagated and made new orders forcing Americans to adopt the unscientific and sophism of gender theory.  We must pray for him. He is our president and does want to help Americans during this time of need; however, his views on other issues must be challenged and pushed back.  I am not endorsing any president as better or more moral than another, but we as Catholics must know where politicians are coming from and push back when they present views contrary to reason, morals, and faith.  Our Catholic faith is above politics and agendas from Democrats, Republicans, or any other party.  We must promote our faith first and vet our politics via our faith. Whatever does not agree must be cast out. 

Finally, in the Gospel, we learn of John's arrest. The last prophet is arrested and will be beheaded. 
Jesus continues after Him by preaching the Gospel of God. He reminds the people then and now that "The kingdom of God is at hand.  Repent, and believe in the Gospel."  Like in the first reading, He warns the people which is what John also did.

However, Jesus continues from that warning into the actual teaching of the Gospel in order to teach the people the way of the Lord as the responsorial Psalm states.  Then He proceeds to call the other disciples by name, Simon, Andrew, James, and John. He uses an interesting phrase, "Come after me, and I will make you fishers of men." Notice how Jesus is very observant. He sees that these men are fishermen.  Today, the Pope wears the "fisherman's ring" as a reminder that He must go out into the deep and fish-men. 

Furthermore, Jesus then uses that fact to connect the work of God with.  He also calls each by name which shows that He focuses on individuals.  We are not in some cosmic college class where God is a professor who does not know the names of His students.   He engages us directly on a first-name basis because He knows us ever since we were forming in our mother's womb (Jeremiah 1:5).  God does the same today. We do not have to be fishermen to do God's work. A doctor, nurse, lawyer, teacher, police officer, fireman, politician, scientist, librarian, school crossing guard, homemaker, businessman, etc; are all called to bring people into the Church using their own talents which will be guided by God's grace (Psalm 48:14). Never feel as if you cannot do God's work on Earth. 

St. Therese of Lisieux reminds us, "Miss no single opportunity of making some small sacrifice, here by a smiling look, thereby a kindly word; always doing the smallest right and doing it all for love." God in many cases does the opposite of what we expect an omnipotent being to do by choosing those who are weak, uneducated, or outcasts to shame the arrogant and those who see themselves as strong or powerful (1 Corinthians 1:27).  Let us listen to God's call to repent, ask him to teach us how to live, and go do what He asks of us with faith, love, and hope.  Today is Sunday of the Word of God as well. Let us take this time to meditate on Scripture, engage in lectio divina or some form of Scripture study so that we can be nourished by God's Word.   



Readings: Third Sunday in Ordinary Time | USCCB


Please be generous and help our ministry during these difficult times.  Donate to our Paypal, www.gofundme.com/sacerdotus, or join our patreon.com/sacerdotus and become a monthly donor.  Your donations help us pay the bills, mail Rosaries, and other things to those who request and help us save funds to expand this work to reach more via podcasts and other means which can be expensive due to technology purchases and subscriptions to services.  You can also buy items at our Sacerdotus Store New tab (teespring.com).  

Sunday, January 25, 2015

3rd Sunday of Ordinary Time - Repent and Follow Me

Today's readings call us to repentance.

In the first reading from the book of Jonah, the word of the Lord God sends Jonah to Nineveh.  There, he is to go warn the people that God would destroy the city if they do not change their ways.  We are told that he took 3 days to do this and that in forty days if they did not heed the warning, Nineveh would be destroyed.

In the Bible, numbers do not necessarily represent numerical value in the mathematical sense.  They are part of a symbolic system called the gematria. Each number represents something. The number 3 represents totality or completeness.  It is used over 400 times throughout the Sacred Scriptures.  The forty days means a long period or a period of preparation or transition. Nineveh was a city that had it all in regards to sin.  We read more details in Nahum 3.

In this city, thievery is rampant, sexual licentiousness, drunkenness, death, merciless killing etc etc. Notice how God gives a warning before He acts.  He sends out Jonah to warn the people. Atheists often like to make claims that the "Old Testament God" is this evil deity who is sadistic and enjoys killing or having others kill in His name.  This is far from the truth and a poor understanding of literary genres in Sacred Scripture. If God was this "evil deity" that did not care, why would He send out Jonah to warn the residents of Nineveh?  Here we see that God is not only just, but merciful (Psalm 86:5, Psalm 145:9, Ephesians 2:4).  He prefers all be saved than destroyed just like any responsible father would not sit back and let his kids do whatever they want.  A father sets rules and enforces them justly.  This is love.

The responsorial Psalm responds to the first reading with the statement: "Teach me your ways, O Lord."  What does this mean?  Well once we repent of our sins and commit to change, then we must learn how to do so. Simply repenting is not going to show us how to continue on the path to holiness. Only God can teach us this since He is perfection (2 Samuel 22:31, Psalm 18:30, Matthew 5:48).

In the second reading, we are reminded that time is running out. We are told by St. Paul to behave as such we are not living our daily lives on Earth. In other words, we must not focus too much on the things of this world, for they will pass. Our world will pass.  Science even agrees with this statement. However, this does not mean all life will disappear with it, nor are some going to go floating in the air in some "rapture."  Rather, God will return like a "thief in the night" and will judge us all (1 Thessalonians 5:2).  We will be judged based on how we loved God and others (Matthew 7:2).  This means we are to love God above things and our neighbor as ourselves (Luke 10:27).  We must not love God only on Sundays and Holy Days, but all the time.  This applies to our neighbors as well. We must not love them only during Mass, but all the time; yes, including those who get on our nerves (Matthew 5:44). We must teach our neighbors the truth and not water it down because it may offend their sensibilities (John 17:17).  It would be a sin against charity to lead others to believe that abortion is moral, that same sex unions is love and valid, that contraception is ethical, or that we should mind our own business and not admonish the sinner so as not to offend them.

Finally in the Gospel, we learn of John's arrest. The last prophet is arrested and will be beheaded.
Jesus continues after Him by preaching the Gospel of God.  He reminds the people then and now that "The kingdom of God is at hand.  Repent, and believe in the Gospel."  Like in the first reading, He warns the people which is what John also did.

However, Jesus continues from that warning into the actual teaching of the Gospel in order to teach the people the way of the Lord as the responsorial Psalm states.  Then He proceeds to call the other disciples by name, Simon, Andrew, James and John. He uses an interesting phrase, "Come after me, and I will make you fishers of men." Notice how Jesus is very observant. He sees that these men are fishermen.  Today, the Pope wears the "fisherman's ring" as a reminder that He must go out into the deep and fish men.

Furthermore, Jesus then uses that fact to connect the work of God with.  He also calls each by name which shows that He focuses on individuals.  We are not in some cosmic college class where God is a professor who does not know the names of His students.   He engages us directly on a first name bases because He knows us ever since we were forming in our mother's womb (Jeremiah 1:5).  God does the same today. We do not have to be fishermen to do God's work. A doctor, nurse, lawyer, teacher, police officer, fireman, politician, scientist, librarian, school crossing guard, home maker, businessman etc; are all called to bring people into the Church using their own talents which will be guided by God's grace (Psalm 48:14). Never feel as if you cannot do God's work on Earth.

St. Therese of Lisieux reminds us, "Miss no single opportunity of making some small sacrifice, here by a smiling look, there by a kindly word; always doing the smallest right and doing it all for love." God in many cases does the opposite of what we expect an omnipotent being to do by choosing those who are weak, uneducated or outcasts to shame the arrogant and those who see themselves as strong or powerful (1 Corinthians 1:27).  Let us listen to God's call to repent, ask him to teach us how to live and go do what He asks of us with faith, love and hope.  



Readings: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings/012515.cfm

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1557) Jesus (722) God (707) Bible (595) Atheism (393) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (274) Apologetics (254) Science (232) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (89) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (73) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Biology (47) Health (47) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)