March For Life 2026

The March for Life 2026: A Joyful Witness to the Gift of Life in Washington, D.C.

On January 23, 2026, tens of thousands of people converged on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., for the 53rd annual National March for Life. Under the inspiring theme "Life Is a Gift," this year's event marked a powerful continuation of the pro-life movement's commitment to defending human dignity from conception to natural death. Held on a crisp winter day, the march drew participants from every corner of the United States and beyond, creating a vibrant sea of signs, songs, and shared purpose. Despite the challenges of post-Roe v. Wade America—where abortion policy has shifted to the states—the energy remained undimmed, focused on cultural change, accompaniment for mothers, and making abortion unthinkable.

The day began early for many with prayer vigils, Masses, and rallies. Catholic groups, in particular, gathered in large numbers for events like the Life Fest rally, organized by the Sisters of Life and the Knights of Columbus. These pre-march gatherings set a tone of hope and renewal, emphasizing that the pro-life cause is rooted in love, compassion, and the inherent value of every human person.

One of the most striking features of the 2026 March for Life was the overwhelming presence of young people. Generation after generation of students—high schoolers, college students, and young adults—filled the Mall, chanting slogans, waving signs, and singing hymns. Youth groups from across denominations traveled by bus overnight, turning the event into a pilgrimage of faith and conviction. Organizers and attendees alike noted that the youth turnout was among the strongest in recent years, signaling that the pro-life message resonates deeply with younger generations who see it as part of a broader fight for justice, human rights, and a culture of life. Their enthusiasm was palpable: faces lit with determination, voices raised in unity, and a sense of joy that countered narratives of division or despair.

The crowd was remarkably diverse in faith backgrounds. Catholics formed a significant portion, with many attending the National Prayer Vigil for Life the night before at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception or participating in diocesan pilgrimages. Protestants marched alongside them, including evangelical groups, Baptists, and non-denominational Christians who emphasized biblical teachings on the sanctity of life. Eastern non-Catholic Christians—such as Orthodox believers—were also visible, bringing their rich liturgical traditions to the witness. What united them was a shared belief in the dignity of the unborn and the need to protect vulnerable lives.

Even more remarkably, the march included voices from beyond traditional Christian circles. Self-identified feminists who support women's rights while opposing abortion participated, arguing that true feminism embraces both mothers and their children. Agnostics and atheists joined as well, drawn by ethical concerns about human rights, science, and the philosophical question of when life begins. These participants highlighted that the pro-life position transcends religion—it is fundamentally about protecting innocent human life and supporting families in need. The inclusivity reflected the movement's evolution: no longer confined to one faith or political party, but a broad coalition united by conscience and compassion.

The rally on the National Mall featured an array of speakers who inspired the crowd. Vice President JD Vance delivered a stirring address, emphasizing that America cannot remain neutral on the value of life. In his remarks, he stressed the importance of protecting the unborn while building a society that supports families through policies on childcare, maternal health, and economic opportunity. He spoke of the pro-life movement's progress since the overturning of Roe v. Wade and called for continued vigilance to ensure that every state safeguards life. His message resonated with attendees, reinforcing the administration's commitment to pro-life principles.

President Donald Trump sent a prerecorded video message that was played to enthusiastic applause. In it, he praised the decades-long efforts of pro-life advocates, celebrated the appointment of justices who made Dobbs possible, and urged Americans to protect the unborn while accompanying mothers in crisis pregnancies. Trump described every child as a "gift from God" and highlighted the need for a culture that values life at all stages. His words echoed the theme of the day, framing the pro-life cause as one of hope, strength, and national renewal.

A particularly profound moment came earlier in the day at a related event: a Mass in Maryland attended by many march participants. Bishop Espaillat delivered a homily that expanded the conversation on what it truly means to be pro-life. He reminded the congregation that being pro-life is not solely about opposing abortion—though that remains central—but encompasses a comprehensive defense of human dignity. The bishop spoke about caring for the poor, welcoming immigrants, protecting the elderly from euthanasia, advocating for just wages, and addressing issues like racism, poverty, and war that threaten life. He drew from Catholic social teaching to illustrate that a consistent ethic of life demands compassion across the board: from the womb to the tomb. "To be pro-life," he said in essence, "is to recognize the image of God in every person and to act accordingly—with mercy, justice, and love." His words challenged attendees to broaden their advocacy, ensuring that the movement remains holistic and rooted in charity rather than judgment.

As the rally concluded, the march began. Participants streamed down Constitution Avenue toward the U.S. Supreme Court, passing landmarks that have witnessed decades of pro-life activism. The atmosphere was peaceful yet powerful—families pushing strollers, priests in cassocks, students in matching hoodies, and people of all ages holding signs declaring "Love Them Both," "Choose Life," and "Life Is a Gift." Chants of "We are the pro-life generation!" rang out, often led by the youth contingent. Music from performers like Sanctus Real and the Friends of Club 21 Choir filled the air, blending contemporary worship with traditional hymns.

The 2026 March for Life occurred amid a unique political and cultural moment. With abortion laws varying by state, the movement has shifted emphasis toward education, support networks, and changing hearts. Pregnancy resource centers have expanded, offering free ultrasounds, counseling, and material aid. Stories shared at the rally—of women supported through unexpected pregnancies, adoptees grateful for life, and former abortion workers turned advocates—underscored the human element behind the policy debates.

The event also highlighted ongoing challenges. Critics attempt to portray the march as regressive or out of touch, yet the diverse crowd—youthful, multi-faith, and inclusive—defied such characterizations. Participants spoke of a "post-Roe" reality where the fight continues on multiple fronts: in legislatures, courts, media, and personal encounters.

In the end, the March for Life 2026 was more than a protest; it was a celebration. It affirmed that life, in all its stages, is a precious gift worthy of protection. It brought together strangers who became brothers and sisters in a common cause. And it inspired hope that, through persistent witness, a culture of life can prevail.

As participants dispersed—some heading home, others to local events—the message lingered: the work continues. But on that January day in Washington, D.C., the joy, unity, and conviction of the crowd offered a glimpse of what a truly pro-life society could look like—one where every life is cherished, every mother supported, and every person seen as bearing the image of God.

Sources:

- March for Life official website: https://marchforlife.org/national-march-for-life and https://marchforlife.org/2026lifeisagift  

- National Catholic Register: Coverage of the 2026 March for Life recap and related events.  

- The White House: Vice President JD Vance's address and President Trump's message on National Sanctity of Human Life Day 2026.  

- Catholic News Agency: Reports on the March for Life 2026 theme, speakers, and vigil attendance.  

- OSV News and Catholic Standard: Articles on the "Life Is a Gift" theme and broader pro-life efforts.  

- Various reports on Bishop Espaillat's homily and Life Fest events (e.g., Catholic Review).  

- Wikipedia and general historical context for the March for Life (Washington, D.C.).  

(Note: Specific quotes and details are synthesized from reported messages and events as described in contemporary coverage.)

It Begins In The Womb

Life begins in the womb. This simple truth, grounded in embryology and basic biology, stands in stark contrast to common claims made by some pro-abortion advocates that a fetus, embryo, or zygote is merely a "blob of cells" or not truly human until birth. Such assertions are not supported by science or logic. Human development unfolds in continuous stages, starting from the moment of conception, and the language we use to describe pregnancy often obscures this reality.

From the instant of fertilization, when a human sperm unites with a human egg, a new human organism comes into existence. This single-celled entity, called a zygote, possesses a complete human genome—46 chromosomes unique to the species Homo sapiens—and begins directing its own growth and development. Standard embryology textbooks, such as those referenced in developmental biology, describe this as the beginning of a new human being. For example, the zygote undergoes cleavage to form a morula, then a blastocyst, which implants in the uterine wall. By the third week, the embryonic period begins, with the formation of the neural tube, heart primordia, and other foundational structures. From weeks 9 onward, the developing human is termed a fetus, continuing maturation until birth. These are not arbitrary labels but scientifically recognized stages in the life cycle of a human organism.

Human females conceive and gestate only human offspring. A woman does not produce canine puppies, feline kittens, or undifferentiated cellular masses that magically transform into humans at some later point. The offspring is human from the start—genetically, biologically, and taxonomically. Claims that reduce the early human to a "blob of cells" ignore the organized, self-directed development that distinguishes a living organism from mere tissue. A skin cell or liver cell is human in origin but lacks the intrinsic potential to develop into a complete human being. The zygote, embryo, and fetus do possess this potential and actively realize it.

Human life progresses through stages: infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age. The prenatal stages—zygote, embryo, fetus—are simply the earliest phases of this continuum. Development does not confer humanity; it unfolds within an already human entity. To suggest otherwise introduces arbitrary criteria disconnected from biology. If humanity begins at birth, what magical property does passage through the birth canal bestow? Oxygen levels? Location? These are not scientifically meaningful markers for the onset of human life.

Everyday language often perpetuates confusion. We casually say a woman is "expecting" a child, that she "has a child on the way," or that parents are "bringing a child into the world" or "welcoming a child to the world." These phrases imply the child does not yet exist or occupies some separate realm, awaiting arrival like a traveler from another dimension. In reality, the child is already here—alive, growing, and present within the womb.

Consider an analogy: We do not claim the heart or brain exists outside the world simply because they reside inside the body. The organs are fully part of the living person, integrated and functioning within the organism. Similarly, the unborn child is not in limbo or en route from elsewhere. The womb is not a wormhole or portal to another spatial dimension; it is the natural environment where human development begins and proceeds. The child is already in the world, nourished by the mother, responding to stimuli, and advancing through developmental milestones.

Phrases like "on the way" or "bringing into the world" may stem from cultural habit or poetic expression, but they carry implications that clash with scientific accuracy. They subtly reinforce the notion that the prenatal human is not fully "here" or fully human, which aligns more with ideological preferences than with embryological facts. Precision in language matters, especially on topics with profound ethical weight. Calling the developing human a "baby" or "child" from early on reflects biological reality rather than diminishing it.

To be clear, acknowledging that human life begins at conception does not automatically resolve all ethical questions surrounding abortion. Questions of rights, bodily autonomy, personhood, and competing interests remain complex and deserve careful consideration. However, the foundational biological claim should not be muddled by euphemisms or misrepresentations. Science shows continuity: a zygote develops into an embryo, which develops into a fetus, which develops into an infant—no abrupt transformation into a human occurs at birth.

Public discourse would benefit from greater accuracy. Instead of "expecting," we might say "nurturing" or "carrying" a child. Rather than "on the way," we could note the child is "already developing." "Welcoming to the world" could shift to "welcoming into visible life" or "celebrating birth." These adjustments align speech with science, reducing cognitive dissonance and fostering clearer thinking.

Ultimately, the womb marks the beginning—not the prelude, not the waiting room, but the origin—of each human life. Denying this requires overriding established embryology and logic with rhetoric that prioritizes convenience over precision. By embracing accurate language and biology, we honor the reality of human development from its earliest, most vulnerable stages. The child is not arriving; the child is already present, growing, and deserving of truthful recognition.

March for Life 2025: A Historic Gathering for the Pro-Life Movement

March for Life 2025: A Historic Gathering for the Pro-Life Movement

On January 24, 2025, thousands of pro-life advocates gathered in Washington, D.C., for the 52nd annual March for Life. This year's event was particularly significant, as it marked the first March for Life since the inauguration of President Donald Trump for his second term. The theme of the march, "Life: Why We March," aimed to highlight the fundamental message of the pro-life movement: to protect unborn children and support their mothers.

A Day of Unity and Purpose

The March for Life began with a pre-rally concert featuring the Christian band Unspoken, setting a hopeful and energetic tone for the day. At noon, the rally officially kicked off on the National Mall, with thousands of participants braving the chilly weather to stand in solidarity for the protection of life. The crowd was diverse, with people of all ages and backgrounds coming together to advocate for the unborn.

Inspiring Speeches and Powerful Testimonies

The rally featured a lineup of inspiring speakers, including politicians, activists, and individuals sharing personal stories. Jeanne Mancini, the outgoing president of the March for Life, welcomed the crowd and introduced the new president, Jennie Bradley Lichter. Lichter, a longtime advocate for the sanctity of life, emphasized the importance of continuing the fight for life even after the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson also addressed the crowd, highlighting the work that President Trump has already done for the pro-life movement, including the recent pardoning of 23 pro-life activists. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida spoke about his state's efforts to protect life, while Lila Rose, president of Live Action, reminded the crowd of the importance of personal conversations in changing hearts and minds on the issue of abortion.

A March for the Unborn

Following the rally, the march began with students from Wheaton College carrying the March for Life banner and leading the crowd down Constitution Avenue toward the Supreme Court building. The marchers held handmade signs and chanted slogans in support of life, creating a powerful visual display of unity and determination.

Looking Ahead

The March for Life 2025 was a significant moment for the pro-life movement, serving as a reminder that the fight for life is far from over. As pro-life advocates continue to work towards changing laws and hearts, the annual march remains a vital platform for raising awareness and advocating for the protection of the unborn.

For more information about the March for Life and how to get involved, visit the [official website](https://marchforlife.org/national-march-for-life/).

: [MSN](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/march-for-life-returns-to-washington-what-to-look-for-when-anti-abortion-activists-gather/ar-AA1xLQ6O)

: [National Catholic Register](https://www.ncregister.com/cna/live-updates-from-the-2025-march-for-life)

: [National Catholic Register](https://www.ncregister.com/cna/march-for-life-2025-in-photos)

: [March for Life](https://marchforlife.org/national-march-for-life/)

: [Catholic News Agency](https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261749/2025-march-for-life-here-s-what-you-need-to-know)

: [Catholic News Agency](https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261743/march-for-life-2025-live-updates)

Pope Francis Sees the American Election Problem Clearly: Trump & Harris are Evil

Pope Francis, known for his candid and often impactful statements, has recently made comments regarding the U.S. presidential election that have stirred discussions and reactions worldwide. 

During an in-flight press conference, the Pope addressed the moral complexities faced by voters in choosing between candidates with differing stances on key issues such as immigration and abortion. His remarks highlighted the challenges Catholics face in reconciling their faith with the political choices available.

The Pope's comments come at a time when the U.S. is deeply divided on many issues, and his words have resonated with many who struggle with the concept of choosing the "lesser evil" in an election. The pontiff's statements underscore the Catholic Church's long-standing teachings on the sanctity of life, marriage, and religious freedom, and the difficulties in finding candidates who align perfectly with these values.

In his comments, Pope Francis did not endorse any candidate but instead urged voters to follow their conscience, emphasizing the importance of participating in the electoral process. He pointed out that both major candidates have policies that could be seen as "against life," referring to the Republican candidate's anti-migrant policies and the Democratic candidate's stance on abortion. He likened Harris to the one "who likes to kill babies" and Trump as the one who "throws away migrants."

The Pope's remarks have sparked a variety of responses, from support to criticism, reflecting the diverse opinions within the Catholic community and beyond. Some have praised the Pope for his willingness to speak openly about such a contentious issue, while others have questioned whether it was appropriate for a religious leader to comment on a specific country's election.

Regardless of the varied reactions, Pope Francis' statements have brought to light the moral dilemmas that many voters face, not just in the U.S. but around the world. His call to action for voters to engage with their conscience and participate in the democratic process is a reminder of the role of personal ethics in public life.

As the U.S. approaches its election day, the Pope's words serve as a catalyst for reflection and discussion on the intersection of faith and politics. It is a moment for voters to consider not only the policies of the candidates but also the broader implications of their choices on society and the world at large. The Pope's comments agree with us here at Sacerdotus who feel neither candidate is worth the US. Presidency. They are simply awful candidates who have no regard for life and the sanctity of it. 

The lesser of two evils simply cannot apply in this election because both candidates are equally against life as the Pope stated.  Trump in 2016 would have easily been the lesser of two evils, however, he has morphed into a different candidate than the one we saw in 2016. He seems more timid on issues and backtraced on pro-life issues. His main focus now is illegal migrants.  On the other hand, Harris is simply focused on abortion children. There is no concern for the economic troubles Americans are facing thanks to her partner President Biden, nor is there any concern for the elevated levels of crime and the influx of illegal immigrants and migrants.  Her focus is simply to abort children as if abortion would solve all the problems of the world!  It is just sickening!

As it stands, no Catholics can vote for either Trump or Harris and be Catholic.  They would be materially cooperative of both candidate's evils.  Both candidates have evil as their platform! 

Let us pray for Trump and Harris to change their minds to a more sane platform that supports life and focuses on the real problems Americans and the world are facing.  

Source:

Pope criticizes Harris and Trump, tells US Catholics to choose ‘lesser evil’ (nbcnews.com)

Pope Francis says Kamala Harris and Donald Trump "both against life" for stances on abortion, immigration - CBS News

Pope slams Harris and Trump as ‘against life,' urges Catholics to vote for ‘lesser evil’ | AP News

Pope Francis says Kamala Harris supports ‘killing babies’ (telegraph.co.uk)

 

Trump Criticizes Florida Abortion Ban

The topic of abortion, especially in the context of political figures and legislation, is a highly sensitive and divisive issue. It's important to approach such topics with a focus on providing factual information and maintaining a neutral stance, respecting the diverse opinions and feelings that individuals may have on the matter.

Recently, there has been significant discussion surrounding former President Donald Trump's stance on a six-week abortion ban. Reports indicate that Trump has expressed criticism of Florida's six-week abortion ban, suggesting that the time frame is too restrictive and indicating potential support for a constitutional amendment to overturn it. This development has sparked a variety of reactions from different political and social groups especially from his own Republican party.

Trump's comments have also extended to the topic of in vitro fertilization (IVF), with statements suggesting that if reelected, his administration would ensure that IVF treatments are fully covered. This has brought reproductive rights and the cost of reproductive health services into the spotlight, highlighting the complexities and personal nature of these issues.

Donald Trump claimed before not to be a politician but is behaving like one now that his poll numbers are shrinking at the onset of the new Democratic Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris.  He is not Pro-life as he claims he is. He is inconsistent on the issue of abortion and now is advocating for it in order to appease the pro-abortion crowd that presents the killing of innocent unborn babies as reproductive health.

It's essential to note that the information available is subject to change, and public figures may clarify or adjust their positions. For those interested in following this topic, staying informed through reliable news sources and official statements is crucial. As the conversation continues to evolve, it will be important to monitor how these discussions impact legislation, public opinion, and the broader discourse on reproductive rights in the United States. 

 

Election Day 2014 - Voting

Voting is an important act and should be used wisely.

We can elect a good person or a bad one.  Our choice can have consequences that we will have to deal with here on Earth.  There is also the factor of having to answer when judgment day or death comes if our conscience and intellect were not properly utilized and we voted in people who brought about evil instead of good.

As citizens of the United States of America, we all have our individual reasons why we vote either way. However, we must not be selfish and only think of our needs or wants and instead vote for the candidate that will bring about the common good for all not just ourselves.

Many I am sure will take this voting opportunity to elect some one they feel will better the economy and bring more jobs since these are the main issues in today's America. Yes, those are excellent reasons to vote for we do need the economy to survive in a world that currently uses money to perform trades and transactions. We also want people to have employment so that they can earn an honest living and meet the expenses of society.  However, we must remember that politicians are known for making promises that are nearly impossible to complete and mainly do so to win over voters. So we cannot rush to judgment on promises alone.  I have yet to learn of a politician who did everything he or she promised.  In most cases, they have done the opposite!

We must be informed voters and understand each candidate's ideas and plans before making a choice. Some will vote for one candidate because he is older, stern and has more experience, while others may vote for another candidate because he or she is a fresh new face in politics or popular. But we must stick to the common good and how either candidate will bring about them.  We must ask ourselves certain questions in good conscience:

• Does the candidate value human life in all stages of development? 
• Does he or she believe life is sacred and precious and must never be aborted or euthanized for any reason? 
• Does he or she respect freedom of religion as the Constitution protects?
• Does the candidate value education for all? 
• Does the candidate value fair economics for all in every social and monetary class? 
• Does the candidate value the sacred institution of marriage between one man and one woman as God and nature intended? 
• Does the candidate value America's customs, its Constitution and laws above him/herself? 
• Does the candidate put America's protection first in a time of war, terrorism and disease?
• Does the candidate want to secure our borders and allow people to enter our country legally or does he or she want people to just come in and show no concern for them or citizens?

These are some of the questions we must ask when choosing a candidate to vote. God gave us conscience so we must put it to use and vote for a candidate that will bring about the common good, not just focus on one area or push his or her personal agenda. This is the moral and intelligent thing to do.

We cannot vote for a candidate based on his or her color, speaking skills, charisma, voting record, interest in helping the rich or the poor, his or her religion, etc. His or her color should not matter, nor his or her speaking skills since speeches are written by others not the candidate. Charisma is important to draw attention, but public office is a serious job and not for a performer. Voting record is important, but those votes are in the past and what matters is the candidate's current platform. A candidate should focus on all, rich and poor. His or her religion should not matter as long as he or she respects the Judeo/Christian values and views of this nation and does not impose his or her own personal views and beliefs on all Americans.

This election is an important one, but so has every other election. Let us vote for a good candidate who will protect all, the unborn, the born, people of all ages, races, gender, religion, orientation and social class. Let us vote for some one who will follow the law in a moral way and not try to legislate his views or try to rewrite social norms such as marriage and when a person should live and die.

God bless America and may the best candidate for our current time win and have great success in bringing about the common good.

"Brain Dead" and Pregnant

A news story about a pregnant woman who is brain dead has nearly taken the media by storm almost as much as Terri Schiavo.

Marlise Munoz was found by her husband Erick Munoz when she was 14 weeks pregnant unconscious on November 26. Hospital officials believed it was due to a blood clot.  Marlise became brain dead and this has brought up a big debate.  Since she was pregnant and the unborn child is still alive, the hospital left her on life support despite wishes from her husband to remove her.

Many supporters on both the pro-life and pro-abortion movements have voice their opinions on the story. The pro-life side says the unborn child is still alive and a patient and should not be killed.  Moreover, the pro-abortion side claims that this is an affront on bodily autonomy.

The issue is extremely complicated because it brings to questoin what death is exactly and what can be and should be done if a brain dead woman is pregnant. Priests For Life director, Fr. Frank Pavone made a statement on the issue:

“The lawsuit launched by Erick Munoz is nothing less than an attempt to kill his wife and #unborn child. It’s a sad mockery of the meaning of fatherhood and of love, life and law.”

This statement brought outrage from pro-abortion supporters and media personalities on Fox New and elsewhere who considered them to be harsh and out of touch with reality. Erick Munoz claims that his wife is dead and is literally decaying before his eyes.  A judge recently ordered that the life support be removed after doctors stated that the unborn child had severe defects and would not survive outside of the womb.

This story is tragic and I feel for everyone. The Catholic ethics teach that the normal essentials (food/drink) be provided in order to allow a natural death and that no one should be kept alive by extraordinary means or artifical means if there is no chance of recovery. It acknowledges that brain dead people are in fact dead.

Source:


http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/texas-hospital-end-care-brain-dead-woman-22029041

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/01/24/marlise_munoz_texas_judge_orders_brain_dead_pregnant_woman_to_be_taken_off.html

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/24/health/pregnant-brain-dead-woman-texas/

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/24/22433012-texas-judge-orders-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-off-life-support?lite

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-01-24/news/chi-brain-dead-pregnant-woman-life-support_1_life-support-texas-judge-brain-dead-pregnant-woman

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/texas-fetus-abnormalities-mother-brain-dead/story?id=21639616

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/08/newser-pregnant-life-support/4370971/

http://healthland.time.com/2014/01/10/why-the-dad-has-no-say-in-dismal-texas-brain-death-case/

http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/43951?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1400137.htm

http://ncronline.org/news/people/ethicists-criticize-treatment-brain-dead-patients

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/ethicist-texas-end-of-life-debate-must-consider-unborn-child/

Cuomo - "Real New Yorkers"

New York's governor Cuomo is under fire for his intolerant words basically identifying New Yorkers as being "pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-gun control etc."

He said on a radio program:

“Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are, and if they are the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.” "Only moderate Republicans have a place in this state.”

With these words, Cuomo has told Catholics, those who uphold the Constitution as well as conservatives that they are not New Yorkers and don't belong there and are extremists.  Seriously Cuomo?!?

He has basically called Cardinal Dolan an extremist.  Cuomo seems to have this tendency to call those who oppose his views "extremists."  The truth of the matter is that the majority of New Yorkers want limits on abortion, do not support so-called "gay marriage" and do not hold the views Cuomo does.  As a matter of fact, Cuomo had to do a backdoor deal in order to get "gay marriage" passed in the senate (see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2011/10/gay-marriage-in-ny.html). Moreover, while New York may be a "northern" state, it still is fond of second amendment rights to bear arms. Cuomo's push for gun control laws has outraged many New Yorkers including cops (see: http://www.wkbw.com/video/Many-Upset-over-New-York-Gun-Law-187062071.html)  

Lori Kehoe of New York State Right to Life had this to say of Cuomo's ignorant remarks:

"If he wasn't serious, it would almost be laughable that Governor Cuomo, who still advocates for no protective regulation on up-to-birth abortion, would consider the pro-life position to be extreme. New Yorkers stood up in force against his violent abortion agenda last year and, as a result, the Senate held the line against third trimester abortion. The facts speak for themselves. It's clear who is too extreme for New York, and it's certainly not the majority of New Yorkers who are opposed to expanding our already-extreme abortion law."

Catholics and others must not elect intolerant people like Cuomo.  This is what happens when we put into power ignorant individuals who discriminate against those who hold different opinions, in this case, the majority opinion.  I am still wondering why Cardinal Dolan has not excommunicated this clown.  He has no place in the Catholic Church while adhering to this views which are anti-Christ in nature.

As a New Yorker I can testify that New York is not a haven for the anti-American, anti-life and anti-morality.  Cuomo really does not understand or know New York.  

 










Source:



http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michael-gerson-andrew-cuomo-silences-the-opposition/2014/01/20/68d3af78-8211-11e3-8099-9181471f7aaf_story.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/20/governor-andrew-cuomo-pro-life-people-not-welcome-in-new-york/

http://nypost.com/2014/01/20/gop-blasts-cuomos-comments-on-conservatives/

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/01/17/andrew-cuomo-pro-life-people-have-no-place-in-the-state-of-new-york/

http://www.nysrighttolife.org/

400,000 Thanks

My blog www.sacerdotus.com has just reached 400,000 hits a few hours ago.  I would like to thank everyone who has visited my blog, read it, commented on it and has fanned it or subscribed to its feed.

In such a short time, this blog has reached so many hits and I hope more will come.

The Irony:
My blogs were mainly promoted on Twitter, but since Twitter is having issue with Catholic speech at the moment and is suspending vocal Catholic accounts, I'm surprised that my blog is getting more hits now without Twitter than with Twitter.  God does work in strange ways; so strange that my very own mathematical, scientific and philosophical mind tries hard to comprehend!

In any event, I will try to continue posting regularly on many topics.  My fortes are science (Physics, Biology, Psychology) and Philosophy.  Theology, Biblical studies and apologetics are a work in progress now as I prepare for Christ's ministry.

Please continue to pray for me.  I attribute the success of this blog to God's grace and Our Lady's intercession.  Personally speaking, I could never run a lemonade stand alone more less a blog ministry without Divine intervention.  I thank the good Lord for this and Our Lady.  Included of course are the angels and saints.

Moreover, I would like to thank the visitors, especially atheists, homosexuals, pro-abortion folks and others who draw attention to my blog by engaging me elsewhere.

Please continue to visit, contribute to and promote my blogs.

www.sacerdotus.com
rationallyfaithful.blogspot.com
http://catholicfaithsharing.blogspot.com 


I anticipate many more interesting post blogs coming soon and for 2014.  May God bless each and every one of you and may our Lady keep you!