Showing posts with label Communion Rite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Communion Rite. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2026

Does Video Show Women Consecrating Bread?

 

A Video, a Misunderstanding, and the Church’s Provision for Sunday Worship Without a Priest

A short video has been circulating among Catholic traditionalist circles. It shows two lay women near the altar in what appears to be a church setting. One holds a host. Viewers, many of them English-speaking and predominantly Caucasian traditionalists, have concluded that the women are simulating the consecration, acting as if they were priests, and thus engaging in a grave liturgical abuse or worse. Comments have ranged from shocked condemnation to personal attacks on the women involved. The audio is in Brazilian Portuguese. That linguistic barrier helps explain the leap to the wrong conclusion, but it does not excuse the rush to judgment or the harsh rhetoric directed at the women.


What the video actually depicts is a recognized and regulated form of Catholic worship: a Sunday celebration in the absence of a priest, often called a Communion service or a Liturgy of the Word with distribution of Holy Communion. The hosts have already been consecrated by a priest at a previous Mass. There is no consecration taking place. The women are not pretending to be priests. They are fulfilling a role the Church herself has authorized under specific conditions when no priest is available.

This post explains the background of the misunderstanding, the nature of these celebrations, the order of the rite, who may lead them, the official permissions and norms that govern them, and why charity remains required even when liturgical practice differs from one’s own experience or preference.



 The Viral Video and the Jump to Conclusions

In regions with severe shortages of priests—common in parts of Latin America, including Brazil—communities regularly gather on Sunday even when a priest cannot reach them. The Church has long recognized this pastoral reality. Rather than leave the faithful without any communal celebration of the Lord’s Day, it provides structured ways for them to assemble, hear the Word of God, pray, and, when reserved hosts are available, receive Holy Communion.

The video shows two women performing functions within such a service. One appears to be holding or presenting a host in the context of distribution or a related moment. To someone unfamiliar with the rite and unable to understand the Portuguese explanations or prayers, the visual can look startling. Traditionalists who emphasize the exclusive role of the ordained priest in the Eucharist understandably react strongly when they believe that role is being usurped. The problem is that the belief is incorrect.

The language barrier is real. Brazilian Portuguese contains liturgical phrasing and pastoral explanations that do not match the visual assumptions of an English-speaking viewer. What may sound or look like a Eucharistic Prayer or words of institution is, in context, something else entirely—prayers of preparation, an invitation to Communion from the reserved Sacrament, or simple instructions. Jumping from an incomplete visual and untranslated audio to accusations of sacrilege or feminist infiltration is understandable as a first reaction; it is not justifiable as a sustained or public judgment.

The women themselves are not public figures seeking controversy. They are local Catholics responding to the needs of their community under the guidance of their local Church. Attacking them personally, questioning their faith, or treating them as enemies of orthodoxy goes beyond legitimate concern for liturgical integrity. Charity and accuracy both demand better.


 What a Sunday Celebration in the Absence of a Priest Actually Is

The full celebration of Sunday for Catholics is the Mass: the Liturgy of the Word joined to the Liturgy of the Eucharist, in which the priest, acting in the person of Christ, confects the Sacrament and offers the Sacrifice. Nothing replaces the Mass. The Church repeatedly insists on this.

Yet the Church also recognizes that circumstances sometimes make Mass impossible for a given community on a given Sunday. Canon law itself addresses the point. Canon 1248 §2 of the Code of Canon Law states: “If participation in the eucharistic celebration becomes impossible because of the absence of a sacred minister or for another grave cause, it is strongly recommended that the faithful take part in a liturgy of the Word if there be such in the parish church or some other sacred place, which is celebrated in accordance with the provisions laid down by the diocesan bishop; or to spend an appropriate time in prayer, whether personally or as a family or, as occasion presents, in a group of families.”

The principal official document elaborating this is the Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship on 2 June 1988 and approved by Pope John Paul II. The Directory does not invent a new form of worship or encourage the absence of priests. It responds to an existing pastoral necessity so that the Christian meaning of Sunday is not lost.

These celebrations are extraordinary, not ordinary. They are not to become a convenient substitute for Mass when a priest could reasonably be obtained. They should foster, not diminish, hunger for the Eucharist. They must carefully avoid any confusion with the Mass itself.

In practice, the preferred form in many places is a Liturgy of the Word with Holy Communion from hosts previously consecrated by a priest and reserved in the tabernacle. Alternatives include a Liturgy of the Word alone or Morning or Evening Prayer from the Liturgy of the Hours, sometimes with Communion.


 The Structure of the Rite

The order carefully distinguishes the service from the Mass. Nothing proper to the Mass—especially the preparation of the gifts in the sacrificial sense or the Eucharistic Prayer—is inserted.


Typical elements include:


- Introductory rites: Gathering, sign of the cross, greeting (adapted so that a lay leader does not use the presidential formulas proper to a priest), introduction explaining that Mass cannot be celebrated today and that the community gathers to hear the Word and (if applicable) receive Communion from the reserved Sacrament, penitential act, and collect or opening prayer.


- Liturgy of the Word: The same readings as those appointed for the Sunday Mass, including the Gospel. A responsorial psalm. A period of silence or a reflection (not a formal homily by a lay person unless specifically authorized; deacons may preach). Profession of faith. General intercessions.


- Communion rite (when reserved hosts are available): The leader goes to the place of reservation, brings the ciborium or pyx to the altar (the altar is approached only at this point in many guidelines, precisely to avoid the appearance of a Mass), leads the Lord’s Prayer, the invitation to Communion (“Behold the Lamb of God…”), and distributes Holy Communion. A prayer after Communion follows. The remaining hosts are returned to the tabernacle.


- Concluding rite: Blessing (in a form appropriate to a lay leader or deacon) and dismissal.


Key visual and rubrical safeguards exist precisely to prevent the misunderstanding seen in the circulating video. The presidential chair is normally not used by a lay leader; the leader often stands among the assembly or at a different place. Vesture, if any, is distinct from priestly vestments. The language used makes clear that this is not the Mass. The Directory and subsequent national and diocesan adaptations stress that the celebration must never look or sound like a simulated Mass.

The host held by one of the women in the video is almost certainly a previously consecrated host being prepared for distribution or shown in the invitation to Communion. No words of consecration are spoken by the laity; none can be effective if spoken by them. The Sacrament remains what a priest has already made it.


 Who May Lead These Celebrations

Preference is always given to a deacon when one is available. A deacon can lead the service, proclaim the Gospel, preach, and distribute Communion as an ordinary minister.

When no deacon is present, the diocesan bishop may appoint suitable lay persons—men or women—as leaders of prayer for these celebrations. Appointment is not a casual local decision; it falls under the bishop’s authority. Leaders are to receive proper formation. The Directory and later documents such as Redemptionis Sacramentum (2004) emphasize that it is preferable to distribute the various roles among several members of the faithful rather than have one lay person appear to “preside” in the manner of a priest. No lay person is ever to be referred to as “presiding” over the celebration in the same sense.

Women have long served in these roles in mission territories and in areas of priest shortage, including parts of Brazil, Portugal, Africa, and elsewhere. This is not a novelty of recent decades or an innovation driven by ideology; it is a practical application of the Church’s norms in concrete circumstances. The same norms apply regardless of the sex of the appointed leader.

Extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion may assist with distribution under the usual conditions. The hosts remain those consecrated by a priest.


 Official Permissions, Laws, and Rubrics

The foundational texts are clear:


- Code of Canon Law, can. 1248 §2 (quoted above).


- Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (Congregation for Divine Worship, 2 June 1988). It outlines the conditions under which such celebrations may be authorized, the theological importance of Sunday, the need to avoid confusion with the Mass, the preference for deacons, the possibility of appointed lay leaders, and the basic structure of the celebration of the Word with Communion.


- Redemptionis Sacramentum (Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 25 March 2004), especially nos. 162–167 on particular celebrations in the absence of a priest. These paragraphs reaffirm that such celebrations are extraordinary, that confusion with the Mass must be avoided, that the diocesan bishop regulates them, that Communion may be distributed according to his prudent judgment, and that roles should be shared among the faithful when no priest or deacon is present. They also insist that those leading keep alive a true hunger for the Eucharist.


National bishops’ conferences and individual dioceses issue more detailed directives adapting the Directory to local circumstances. In Brazil and other Portuguese-speaking regions, corresponding guidelines exist and have been in use for years. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has published ritual editions of Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest. Similar provisions appear in Australia, England and Wales, and many other places.

These are not loopholes or progressive experiments. They are the Church’s own response to the scarcity of priests while safeguarding the unique character of the Mass and the ministerial priesthood.


 Charity, Accuracy, and the Larger Context

Priest shortages are a real and growing pastoral challenge in many parts of the world. Blaming the women in the video for responding to that challenge under the Church’s norms solves nothing. Misidentifying a Communion service as a simulated consecration spreads confusion rather than clarity. Public attacks that treat the women as ideological actors rather than local Catholics doing what their bishop and the universal norms allow are unjust.

Traditionalists rightly defend the centrality of the Mass, the exclusive power of the ordained priest to confect the Eucharist, and the need for reverence and clarity in liturgy. Those concerns are valid. They are best served by accurate knowledge of what the Church actually permits and by restraint in judgment when evidence is incomplete, especially when a language barrier is involved.

The women in the video are not the enemy of orthodoxy. In the concrete circumstances of their community, they are helping the faithful keep Sunday as the Lord’s Day to the extent possible until a priest can be present. That is the purpose the Directory itself assigns to these celebrations.

Understanding the rite, the norms that authorize it, and the difference between reserved Communion and consecration removes the basis for the false accusation. Charity then requires that we stop treating the women as if they had committed the offense that was mistakenly attributed to them.

Sunday remains the day of the Resurrection. The Mass remains its fullest celebration. When the Mass cannot be had, the Church still provides a way for the community to gather around the Word and the reserved Sacrament. That provision is not a threat to the priesthood; it is a pastoral response that assumes the priesthood’s irreplaceable role.

The circulating video does not show women pretending to be priests. It shows a permitted form of Sunday worship under the norms of the Catholic Church. Accurate knowledge and Christian charity are the proper responses.



 References


- Code of Canon Law (1983), can. 1248 §2.


- Congregation for Divine Worship, Directory for Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (2 June 1988).


- Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Redemptionis Sacramentum (25 March 2004), especially nos. 162–167.


- Sacrosanctum Concilium (Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy), art. 106 (on the importance of Sunday).


- United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest (ritual editions, various revisions conforming to the third edition of the Roman Missal).


- Diocesan and national guidelines implementing the 1988 Directory (examples available from various bishops’ conferences, including those in Portuguese-speaking regions).


- Related texts: Holy Communion and Worship of the Eucharist Outside Mass (ritual), and relevant canons on extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion (can. 910, 230 §3).



Monday, August 4, 2014

Piece on Peace

When Cardinal Ratzinger became Pope in 2005, we who keep watch of Church affairs all knew there were possibly going to be many changes or at least a clean up of the Liturgy.  We were right!

Pope Benedict XVI had many inquires started in order to investigate the abuses carried out on the Liturgy after Vatican II documents were misinterpreted.  After all, being in charge of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he knew all the details better than anyone else. He knew what was going on, who was doing it and how to tackle the problems. Let's not forget that he was also part of Vatican II as a young priest.

Once such study was started in 2005 at the Synod on the Eucharist.  This study involved the "Sign of Peace" part of the Mass which is done before the Lamb of God. For many decades, the sign of peace became a part of the Mass that seemed out of place. Pope Emeritus explained why in his apostolic exhortation in 2007, "Sacramentum Caritatis."  He wrote the following:

“During the synod of bishops was the appropriateness of greater restraint in this gesture, which can be exaggerated and cause a certain distraction in the assembly just before communion. It is important to remember that nothing is lost when the sign sobriety needed to maintain a climate suitable for celebration, for example by making sure to limit the exchange of peace to those who are closest.”

He continued in a footnote:

“Taking into account ancient and venerable customs and the wishes expressed by the Synod Fathers, I asked the relevant departments to study the possibility of moving the sign of peace to another place, such as before the presentation of the gifts to the altar. This choice, however, would not fail to elicit a significant reminder of the Lord on the reconciliation required prior to any offer to God.”

Basically what Pope Emeritus is saying here is that the sign of peace has been distorted.  Like he wrote, it is "exaggerated and cause a certain distraction in the assembly just before communion." He is correct!  The sign of peace has been abused for many decades now. Many times, people are running around the church hugging and kissing one another and are not even paying attention to the "Lamb of God" or the breaking of the bread. It just looks awful. It takes away from the seriousness and solemnity of having the Holy Eucharist present.  He also offered the suggestion of moving it which I will address later on.  

The priest even at times steps down to the pews to shake people's hands.  Sometimes he is still shaking people's hands as the choir sings the "Lamb of God." It's just irreverent and turns the Mass into a social gathering instead of a commemoration of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It sometimes feels as if people are greeting each other because the world is about to end and they have to exaggerate the greeting.  After Mass, people can say hi to each other all they want. There's no need to exaggerate during this part of the Mass as if you're never going to see each other again!

Some people are already complaining about this study and its conclusions claiming the Catholic Church is turning into a Puritanical "don't touch me" anti social religion.  This is far from the case. There are many reasons why this study had to happen and why the recommendations made must take effect.  Here are some:

Reverence:
As stated above, the priest coming down to greet people seems fine, but sometimes it's just a disaster. It takes time and he is contaminating his hands after he washed them during the offertory. It's just sad to see the Holy Eucharist alone on the altar as the priest is out and about "high fiving" people as if this were a concert.  Let me not get into children's Masses where a priest goes around petting the head of kids which almost looks like he's playing "duck-duck-goose."  The focus becomes the priest, not Jesus on the altar who we are about to receive.

Hygiene:
The priest coming down from the altar to shake hands and "high five" everyone contaminates his hands.  He then breaks the host and prepares ciboriums for Holy Communion with those hands which have become petri dishes. This is a recipe for the "flu/cold, hepatitis apocalypse."

Distraction:
I've already established how the priest coming down to greet everyone is distracting, but there is also the congregation itself.  Having people move from pew to pew, or around the church to greet a friend who is shy and sits 100 feet away is just not necessary. The noise this movement makes, and as I mentioned before, the lack of attention given during the Lamb of God just makes the Mass look like it stopped for a brief movement to become a social gathering.

It sort of reminds me of that viral video "Harlem Shake" where the video shows people behaving normally and then all of a sudden music comes on and they start dancing or doing crazy things only to then return to normal as if nothing happened when the music stops.  This is what the sign of peace sometimes looks like.  The Mass starts out solemn and going steady and then out of nowhere, it turns into this social gathering with people running around and then it calms as if nothing happened.

Now I'm a young guy who likes to party and have fun, but there's a time a place for that. I think Ecclesiastes 3:8 would agree with me.  The Mass is NOT the time nor place!

Anyhow, the Congregation for Divine Worship which conducted the 9 year long study decided not to remove the sign of peace. There were rumors that it might be moved to before the offertory as a symbol of one having to be right with his brother before coming to the altar.

Matthew 5:23-24: "If you bring your gift to the altar, and there recall that your brother has anything against you, leave your gift there at the altar, go first and be reconciled with your brother, and then come and offer your gift."

This sounds like a good idea, but this change is too abrupt to do now. However, the congregation did give recommendations.

It said that it will present some "practical measures to better express the meaning of the sign of peace and to moderate excesses, which create confusion in the liturgical assembly just prior to Communion."  The congregation reminded us that the rite is optional. Many don't know this, but the priest or celebrant doesn't have to tell the people to exchange a sign of peace with one another. Masses on EWTN celebrated by the Franciscan Friars of the Eternal Word often do this.

Another recommendation the Congregation for Divine Worship  gave was to update the way the Roman Missal directs celebrants on the sign of peace offering more suitable ways that do not distract from the Mass. Lastly, it also made it clear that several abuses had to end.  Among these are the "song of peace" which is typical of Spanish Masses where they sing some song that is not even liturgical as well as the movement of the people and priest in order to greet one another.  It also condemned the use of the sign of peace at funerals or weddings as platforms to congratulate others or offer sympathy on the loss of a family member whose funeral is being offered.

Nevertheless,the Congregation for Divine Worship made it clear its wishes that bishop's conferences around the world offer catechesis or education forums in order to instruct celebrants and the lay faithful on how to correctly observe the sign of peace.

My Thoughts:

I agree with the Congregation for Divine Worship that the sign of peace has become a social show within the Mass.  It can be distracting and rude towards our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament.  However, there will be some people who will not be happy with this study and its recommendations.  Those who call themselves "conservative" Catholics are ecstatic about this, but there are those who may not consider themselves "liberal" Catholics who will be upset for cultural reasons.

Hispanics, Italians and other groups love to hug, kiss and be friendly. The Congregation for Divine Worship needs to address the issue of inculturation in regards to the sign of peace.  People already think the Mass is too "Eurocentric" and cold and prefer to attend a Protestant service which makes them feel "at home" many times. Bishops will need to tackle this problem where those who are used to more social-bodily forms of greeting will feel left out or awkward in an ambiance that may look more like a lineup of frozen soldiers than brothers and sisters in Christ.  




Source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/02/vatican-priests-peace_n_5642394.html

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1403223.htm

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/pat-archbold/ditch-the-sign-of-peace-or-take-your-stinking-paws-off-me-you-darn-dirty-ap

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/deaconsbench/2014/07/report-sign-of-peace-to-remain-in-place-at-mass/

http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/

http://www.religionnews.com/2014/08/01/vatican-urges-priests-clamp-excessive-emotions-sign-peace/

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/vatican-announces-desire-for-more-restrained-sign-of-peace-at-mass-36123/

http://www.catholic.org/news/hf/faith/story.php?id=56415

http://www.ucanews.com/news/vatican-wants-to-ensure-dignity-of-sign-of-peace-during-mass/71570

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=22198







   

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1557) Jesus (722) God (707) Bible (595) Atheism (393) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (274) Apologetics (254) Science (232) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (89) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (73) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Biology (47) Health (47) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)