Showing posts with label CNN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CNN. Show all posts

Monday, October 11, 2021

Bishop Barres Removes CNN's Fr. Beck's Faculties

 Bishop Barres bishop of the Rockville Centre Diocese has removed Fr. Beck of the Passionist order and regular on CNN from functioning as a priest in his diocese. ON their part, the Passionists are inquiring as to why this was done and have stated that they will be leaving the diocese's parish St. Therese church on the feast day of St. Paul of the Cross on October 19. 

Parishioners of the parid were told on October 6 of the order's decision to pull out of the parish and its trustees are upset. They are calling for answers from Bishop Barres and the diocese. The diocese claims that they had a written agreement stating that Fr. Beck's faculties would expire in August. However, the Passionists dispute this claiming, "It had not been, nor was it ever stated that Father Beck would be in Montauk for just a year." 

Faculties are the canonical/legal term for a cleric's powers to function as a priest within a diocese. While a priest is ordained forever, he cannot function as a priest without permission from a bishop. It is like a police officer who can only function as a cop when he or she has his or her badge and is in good standing. 

Fr. Beck is concerned over the decisions and rightfully so. The removal of faculties is often interpreted as a punishment against a priest who did wrong. In today's age, sexual abuse is the first thought many minds cross when they hear that a cleric lost his faculties. By the diocese not giving a reason, Fr. Beck is concerned for his reputation. 

The parish Fr. Beck is being removed from has been suffering due to poor leadership according to parishioners. The Passionists were allowed to work at the parish to bring some stability. Clearly, parishioners love their presence there and are upset over the order's decision to leave the parish due to the diocese's removal of Fr. Beck's faculties.  

Let us pray for all parties involved and for a resolution. 


Source: Father Edward Beck on Twitter: "Some news New York diocese's unexpected removal of popular CNN priest roils parish | National Catholic Reporter https://t.co/pkDapoNGDH" / Twitter

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Trump Fanaticism

Exodus 20:3 says that one shall not have other gods before the One True God. This quote from the Bible should be held deep in the hearts and minds of those who call themselves Christians. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. Human fanaticism gets in the way.

Human beings have a tendency of placing other humans above them. We see how people go wild at the sight of a celebrity or music artist. They get so wild that sometimes people are hurt or killed in the commotion. This is a sad consequence of human psychology.

Political fanaticism is equally as dangerous. On CNN there was an interview where a Trump supported said that he would believe President Trump over Jesus Christ. Can you believe this? It actually happened. See the video here:






I am hoping this man was joking. His comment is extremely ignorant and makes many of us question his mental health. How can Donald Trump be more believable than Jesus who is God and Son of God? Jesus who is the Truth (John 14:6)! This mere thought of it is sickening. Donald Trump has been caught on so many lies by the media and those who monitor politicians. It is no surprise that politicians often lie to get their way. Trump is no different despite not being a traditional politician. Claiming that Trump is more believable that Jesus is blasphemy and idolatry. Trump is a mere man with many faults. Christ is God and man who is pure love, holiness, and truth. I would always believe Jesus over Trump, my family, friends, and even the pope!

The fanaticism for Trump is disturbing indeed. There was even someone impersonating me on Google Plus and was posting pro-Trump propaganda. I had those profiles taken down. I do not support any politician. While I like some ideas Trump, Clinton, and Sanders had, this does not mean that I endorse them. I respect our president Donald Trump because he is the president, but I will not support everything he says and does. I feel he is not too strong on pro-life and marriage issues. Moreover, he is not too strong in science and education. His ideas on climate change are terrifying. However, I do agree with him on most of his ideas on illegal immigration and religious freedom.

Others have put so much confidence in Trump that they will defend him against reason. This is scary. The guy being interviewed by CNN is an example. Then there are others who get offended if you speak out against Trump. I have had some crazy Catholics attack me for speaking against Trump. They think that somehow honoring Trump makes you a good Catholic. These people have trashed our pope over Trump. It is disgusting and shows the poor mental state in these individuals. We cannot blindly follow anyone or else we will repeat the history regarding Hitler. All leaders and people in power must be vetted against reason and morality. No one is above Jesus, not even Trump. I would hope that Trump would tweet or speak out against this follow of his and condemn his offensive comment.

Jesus is Lord and only Him (Philippians 2:11)! If Jesus commands me to rebel against Trump or even my nation, the United States of America. I will not hesitate to do so. Jesus Christ is number 1, everyone else is number 2.




Source:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/11/20/voter-panel-trump-supporter-camerota-sot-newday.cnn

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/361158-trump-voter-if-jesus-christ-told-me-trump-colluded-with-russia-id





Monday, September 26, 2016

CNN #Debate2016: Trump vs Clinton

The day we all have been waiting for finally came. Just about an hour ago, presidential candidates Donald Trump (R) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) squared off in a live televised debate on CNN.  The debate was held at HOFSTRA university. MSNBC's Lester Holt served as moderator. This debate was expected to have over 100 million viewers, a record breaker for televised presidential debates. The format was similar to that of primary debates with the exception that the audience could not applause and interrupt the candidates. There were certain instances where the audience forgot this rule and cheered anyhow.

The debate was well organized, in my opinion.  Donald Trump came out strong in the first half hour or so. He countered Hillary Clinton's points very well.  However, the rest of the way, he seemed to have lost steam.  Clinton spoke eloquently on the economy, jobs and racism.  At times, she brushed off Trump with condescending tone. It was apparently clear that she was trying to bait him to get emotional on stage.  Trump at times did get flustered, kept drinking water but never got into a shouting match like he did against Jeb Bush during the primary debates. Clinton did not get into any shouting match as well, but one could tell that she was holding back.  Both candidates sighed a few times, showing frustration.  On the economy, Trump did very well. He reminded everyone of the situation the nation is in and that he will be the best person to fix the problems regarding jobs and the national debt.  Clinton spoke as a scripted politician and Trump did a good job calling her out on that by stating that politicians are all talk and no action. This fit his narrative well since he is billing himself as the "outsider" against career politicians.

Clinton attacked Trump for not opening up his tax returns. Trumps shot back saying that he will release them when she releases the 30,000 emails she deleted. Clinton accused Trump of hiding that he does not pay taxes. Trump shot back saying, "That makes me smart." This may have harmed him with voters who are not pleased with how the rich often get away without paying taxes. It seems Clinton set him up to say this. Clinton also went after Trump's business record attacking him for going into bankruptcy and not paying contractors. Trump responded that this was business and that he does not pay anyone who does a bad job. Clinton presented herself as having experience. Trump rebuttal saying "She's got experience but it's bad experience."  This drew cheering from the crowd.

The issue of birtherism was brought up. Trump accused Clinton and a staffer of promoting the idea that Obama was not an American citizen. Clinton pushed the view that Trump's request for Obama's birth certificate was offensive to African Americans and bothered president Obama greatly. The topic was mixed with the talk on violence in cities.  Trump stated that stop and frisk must be brought back. He stated that it help reduced crime in New York City dramatically.  An NYPD tweet seemed to have confirmed this.



Ironically, the wall and immigration were not brought up in the debate. Clinton did jab Trump on his temperament. However, Trump stated that he had a better temperament citing Hillary's recent outburst with a reporter. Clinton said that American cannot have a president who loses it over a tweet controlling nuclear weapons.  Trump replied, "That line is getting old."  The debate was interesting to watch.  I was expecting more of a showdown, but perhaps the candidate held back in order to see how polls responded. Not much in regards to plans were discussed. To me, the debate seemed more like a discussion. Trump did interrupt Clinton a few times which I think was uncalled for. Some in the media are spinning it saying he was trying to speak over a woman. Clinton seemed poised the well measured but obviously scripted.  She did prepare for the debate, one could tell. Trump, I believe, did not prepare well enough and was left looking weak at certain instances.  Lester Holt was also asking Trump more questions than Hillary, which I found unfair. He was clearly protecting Clinton.  She hardly got crossed examined.



Most people on the media and social media believe Clinton won.  So far, a poll I posted on Twitter shows this same view.  I personally believe it was a tie.  Neither candidate really stood out.








Earlier in the day, I posted this poll which showed many believed Trump would win.



Source:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/09/26/newspoliticselectionsfact-checking-presidential-debate-between-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/91145368/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/09/27/fact-checking-the-first-clinton-trump-presidential-debate/

http://www.wsj.com/articles/undecided-voters-react-coolly-to-donald-trump-during-debate-1474947738?mod=e2tw

http://abc7.com/politics/clinton-trump-battle-in-presidential-debate-over-taxes-race-terror/1528049/

Friday, April 15, 2016

Brooklyn Brawl: #DemDebate



Last night, another CNN debate took place with democratic candidates for the presidency, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. The debate was held at the Navy Yards in Brooklyn, New York. Brooklyn is the hometown of Bernie Sanders.

This debate was different from previous ones. Both candidates went at it accusing each other of many things, shouting at each other and forcing the moderators to interject to get them to calm down. Bernie attacked Hillary on her connections with Wall Street and called on her to release the transcript of her speaking engagement. He also attacked her on her vote for the Iraq war. Sanders presented himself as the candidate for the people, painting Clinton as the 'establishment' candidate. Clinton attacked back mentioning his interview gaffe with the New York Daily News where Sanders came across as unprepared and called on him to release his taxes which he said he would on today. However, Sanders got Clinton to actually agree with him on social security which got her visibly upset, but she tried to 'smile it away.' She went after him on the NRA and gun control.

Sanders hit her back hard regarding the situation in Israel as well as climate change. The crowd was obviously on the side of Sanders. They cheered the most for him and at several times chanted 'Bernie Bernie Bernie.' Clinton was visibly embarrassed and acknowledged that the crowd was in Sanders' favor in her closing statement. Sanders cast doubt on Clinton's judgement and her ability to handle things. He also called her out on her constant mind changing on what the minimum wage should be.

In my opinion, Bernie Sanders won this debate. He destroyed Clinton on many points, made her look contradictory and got her to lose her temper a few times which she tried to mask with an exaggerated smile. Clinton looked visibly uncomfortable in a city she represented as senator.    













Source:
http://www.nytimes.com/live/democratic-debate-cnn-april-2016/

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/sparks-fly-between-clinton-sanders-heated-brooklyn-debate-n556366

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-debate-brooklyn-article-1.2601821

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sanders-warns-of-drought-and-1407841280679990.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/15/us/politics/who-won-the-debate.html?_r=0

http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/14/politics/democratic-debate-brooklyn-recap/

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Post Super Tuesday II CNN #GOPDebate



Another CNN Republican debate just took place with the remaining four candidates.  The debate also took place on the eve of the announcement that former presidential candidate Ben Carson would endorse Trump on Friday.

The debate tonight was much different than previous ones.  It was the first one where there was no bickering or arguing; no vulgar innuendos regarding penis size and so forth.  There was civility and actual points made. Each candidate did extremely well including Donald Trump who came across as with 'little energy' and expounded more on his ideas.

Trump was questioned on the violence in his rallies and his comment that Muslims hate Americans.  He answered the questions by stating that he does not intend his rallies to become violent and says that police are present.  In regards to Muslims, he said that "alot" of Muslims hate American. Regarding Cuba, Rubio gave an excellent response. He also avoided attacking Trump like he did in previous debates.  Cruz also make strong arguments and avoided attacking Trump.  Some pundits say this may be the last debate if the next primaries force the candidates with less delegates to drop out.





Source:

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/03/10/cnns-jake-tapper-to-donald-trump-do-you-think-all-1-6-billion/21326033/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk2&pLid=987882355

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/11/politics/republican-debate-takeaways/


https://www.yahoo.com/politics/civility-makes-a-surprise-appearance-at-gop-debate-040000789.html

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/cnn-republican-debate-presidential-election-2016/

Monday, March 7, 2016

Post Super Saturday CNN #DemDebate


Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders faced off once again on CNN for a post Super Saturday debate. The debate took place in Flint, Michigan where the area is facing a big scandal due to water pollution.  Both candidate called on the governor of the state to resign. They then got into heated exchanges over jobs, trade agreements and Wall Street.  At one point, Bernie Sanders yelled at Clinton to stop interrupting that the is speaking. Sanders tried to make a pitch to minority voters by mentioning his years as a student at the University of Chicago.

Clinton spoke of her time working for Marian Wright Edelman where she investigated Alabama schools for discrimination based on race. Both candidate voiced this differences on fracking with Clinton in support of it and Sanders against it.  With Clinton taking in a large amount of delegates, Sanders is now on the defensive and is trying all he can to get votes in order to be viable in this election.           












Source:

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/bernie-sanders-feisty-debate-excuse-me-im-023738092.html

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/a-lead-pipe-cinch-clinton-sanders-make-a-promise-024157239.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/06/politics/democratic-debate-recap/

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/03/06/469444743/the-7th-democratic-debate-in-100-words-and-3-videos

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/07/us/politics/what-you-have-missed.html

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

2nd CNN GOP Debate

The last GOP debate on CNN for 2015 just took place.  In the first round, lower rated candidate took the podium.  Santorum, Graham, Huckabee and Pataki were those in this debate.  The debate took on the topic of national security.  Each candidate differed on the approach he would take on national security. Huckabee, Santorum and Pataki did take a strong stance on the surveillance of Muslims. Linsey Graham seemed emotional and came to the defense of Muslims even apologizing for Trump's remarks. Santorum became the target of Pataki and Twitter users after he stated his disagreement with having women in the front lines during battle.  In this debate, Graham clearly won.

The second debate was very active. Bush was more energized in this debate and even make Trump look out to be a cry baby. Trump complained about Bush's remarks, interruptions and CNN's insistence on wording questions around him.  Bush responded that if Trump could not handle this then what makes him think he would handle the presidency and all that it entails. Trump was visibly upset, turning red and holding back. Bush as well seemed to be holding back. Rand Paul also attacked Trump claiming that America needs a president that follows the Constitution in reference to Trump's remarks about banning Muslims.  Chris Christie did pretty well and once again tried to be the peace maker as other candidates were attacking each other.  However, he messed up with the name of the King of Jordan. Rubio and Cruz went at it over their immigration records. Kasick showed he is knowledgeable but hardly participated in the debate when compared to the others.  Carly Fiorina was also not questioned as much as the others, nor did she get caught up in any back and forth with the other candidates. Trump spoke toughly and did not recant on his recent statements.  This debate seemed to have been his weakest so far. Carson did much better in regards to foreign policy but was booed when he was asked if he would bomb innocent children in Raqqa and he did not say that he would not.





Source:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/republican-presidential-debate-las-vegas/420657/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/15/politics/lindsey-graham-best-lines-gop-debate/

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/jeb-bush-takes-on-trump-youre-not-going-to-be-035557322.html

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/trump-triumphs-newsmax-poll-gop-debate/2015/12/15/id/705961/

http://www.redstate.com/2015/12/15/winners-losers-tonights-cnnsalem-debate/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/15/winners-and-losers-from-the-5th-republican-presidential-debate/

Thursday, September 17, 2015

CNN GOP Debate

The CNN GOP debates just took place and they were much better than the FOX ones.  In the first round, I feel that Bobby Jindal and Rick Santorum.  Both answered the questions well and stood faithful to their conservative platforms.  Pataki came across as a fake conservative who at times attacked religious liberty.  Lindsey Graham also came across as a push over politician who does not fight to push his agenda and just accepts the status quo.

In the second round, I felt Carly Fiorina, Donald Trump, Chris Christie and Marco Rubio won. Fiorina went after Trump early on calling him an entertainer. Trump attacked her back on her career as a CEO which ended in termination. Trump told her that he would not want her in charge of his companies.  Jeb Bush also went after Trump but seemed to back down when Trump spoke. Chris Christie came across stronger in this debate and at times tried to be referee between Trump and Fiorina as they discussed the successes and failures of their careers.  Christie also focused more on the American people by asking that the camera be put on them. He also kept mentioning the struggling middle class during his responses. This is ironic because he became known due to his personality, not for his concern for others. The rude and abrasive governor turned into a pacifist here.

Fiorina did not smile and remained stoic. Trump surprisingly smiled a lot and seemed to be more toned down.  Rubio answered well, but he seemed too coached and robotic. Ted Cruz spoke to the Republican base and also did well but did not speak much. Huckabee was articulate but also did not speak as much as the others.  Carson did not come across as strong in this debate. His strongest point was when he spoke on vaccines.  Rand Paul spoke strongly on state rights but was shut down by Fiorina when she addressed marijuana use and how it is being pushed as "drinking beer" when in fact it is dangerous. Her strongest point I believe was when she spoke on the Planned Parenthood videos. Kasich was very weak in this debate and Walker as well. I predict that Carly will see and increase in poll numbers after this debate. CNN did a good job with this debate.  However, they seemed to have been trying to get Trump to fight with Bush and Fiorina at times.  It seemed like the rules regarding time were suspended for these three.    



Source:

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/jeb-bush-puts-donald-trump-on-defense-then-lets-129257872771.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/us/politics/candidates-use-second-gop-debate-to-taunt-trump.html

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/republican-presidential-debate/405802/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/16/politics/republican-debate-fact-check/index.html

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/16/live-republican-presidential-debate-09-16-2015

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/09/16/winners-and-losers-from-the-cnn-debate/

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Fourth Incriminating Planned Parenthood Video & Hacking Claims


A fourth video was just released by the Center for Medical Progress. The video was released amidst complaints from Planned Parenthood that its website was hacked and taken down by "Anti-Abortion Extremists."

It is interesting to note that CNN and other media outlets were not able to independently confirm this hack so it seems it may be a ploy by Planned Parenthood to deflect and increase donations by pretending to be the victim.  This is most likely the scenario due to the timing.  Planned Parenthood has been in existence for years and are we to believe that now is the time an "anti-abortion  extremist" is going to hack it?  It seems far-fetched. Then we see the timing in regards to the release of these videos.  It just does not seem kosher, so to speak.

If this is the case, then we can see clearly how Planned Parenthood is desperately trying to deflect from the attention it has been getting. This new video has Medical Director Savita Ginde discussing contract details, the prices of specific fetus body parts and how not to "get caught." The transactions are to be called 'research,' not 'business,' according to the video. Moreover, a discussion is had in regards to the fetal body having parts that are 'intact.'  More videos will be coming out and will hopefully bring politicians to push for the defunding of this evil organization and prosecution of those trafficking human fetus body parts which is illegal.








Source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWQuZMvcFA8&app=desktop

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/planned-parenthood-claims-database-website-hacked-by-anti-abortion-extremis

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/2015/07/29/id/659549/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/index.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/30/us-usa-plannedparenthood-cyberattack-idUSKCN0Q409120150730

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/deaconsbench/2015/07/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/

http://thefederalist.com/2015/07/30/planned-parenthood-hacking-sure-looks-like-an-orchestrated-pr-stunt/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/planned-parenthood-website-hacked/index.html

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/30/planned-parenthoods-hacked-website-looks-like-pr-stunt/

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/07/30/is-planned-parenthood-lying-about-its-web-site-being-hacked-possible-publicity-stunt/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/30/call-it-research-not-business-planned-parenthood-doc-says-in-latest-sting-video/?cmpid=cmty_twitter_fn

http://liveactionnews.org/planned-parenthood-baby-parts-scandal-grows-as-new-tape-released/

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Cnn Special Report on Atheists - #CnnAtheists

Next Tuesday,  March 24 at 9:00 PM est CNN will have a special report program on the social phenomenon called Atheism.  This report is said to take a closer look at the movement of Atheism in America.  I advise all Catholics and believers to view it to get an idea of how these people think and how they organize themselves.



I will update this post as I learn more details and will give my review after I view it. Stayed tune.


UPDATE** March 24, 2014  10 PM EST

Well, I just watched this report and have some mixed feelings about it.  Overall, atheism was presented fairly well.  However, it was also presented as a parody of religion.  The report showcased young atheists, one with religious parents and another who is studying at Harvard's divinity school. It also presented Richard Dawkins, David Silverman, Jerry W. DeWitt, and an anonymous protestant minister who is flirting with atheism, so to speak.  One of the young atheists named David Gormley is a son of religious parents who were shocked when he told them that he was an atheist.  His parents claim that he became "dead" to them.  However, they still live together but are not as close.  David claims that other friends and relatives stopped talking to him altogether.  He runs a secular club at his university and claims that as a young person, going to church did not make sense to him after spending Wednesdays for 6-8 hours praying to God.  David felt out of place and decided atheism was for him.  The other young person, Vanessa Sotay stated that she studied at Harvard Divinity school because she believes religion is part of humanity in a cultural sense.  She was raised as a reformed Jew.

Jerry W. DeWitt was a Pentecostal pastor who almost ran for mayor. However, he had doubts deep in himself. While on a call to see a parishioner's's relative who got into a car accident, he claims that event confirmed his atheism. He felt that prayer was useless.  In 2011, he quit his pastor job and became a building inspector. When his family saw him photographed with Richard Dawkins on Facebook, his wife left him, his congregation became upset with him and he went into foreclosure due to debt.  DeWitt now rents a home and uses it to house "atheistic services."  He literally preaches to a congregation entitled, "Community Mission Chapel."  Furthermore, the CNN report featured an alleged Protestant minister who lost his faith. He is part of the "Clergy Project" which is a community of current and former clergy who are atheists but fear revealing that detail due to the fact that their ministry may be their livelihood and they will lose it.

In conclusion, the special report on atheism was interesting, but I believe some atheists would disapprove of the reporting. As stated before, the report presented atheism as sort of a parody of religion. Students and former pastors were presented as being "chaplains" for atheism or humanist communities. DeWitt is even running a church-like ministry catering to humanists where he has monetary collections just like a typical Christian denomination would have. Viewers can see the clear cognitive dissonance of these atheists.  They dislike God and religion, but then present atheism as a religion to their followers.  It is just absurd.  The idea of a humanist chaplain or atheist chaplain is ridiculous. Moreover, the idea of an "atheist preacher" is laughable.  It is clear that DeWitt is using atheism to make money. One guy even stated that atheism is part of American religious diversity. The show presented atheism as a religion.  I am not sure how other atheists will take this as many state that atheism is not a religious movement.  The two young people presented clearly are atheists for emotional reasons.  David's parents are Evangelicals who took him to their service which lasted 6-8 hours.  Any child will come to dislike something they attend every week for 6-8 hours!  He is also going through a rebellious stage by distancing himself from the social script his parents brought him up in.  Atheism is a way for him to feel independent.  He is doing "his own thing" instead of repeating his parents scripts.  Vanessa comes from a Jewish family who survived the Holocaust. She claims that "God did not survive the Holocaust."  I took this as her way of saying that God was not there for the Jews who were killed during this horrific event.  This probably turned off her family from continuing their faith in God.

Meanwhile, David Silverman uses his usual appeal to ignorance tactic by claiming that there is no evidence for God.  I address this fallacy here: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2012/11/no-evidence-for-god-therefore-no-god.html.  Moreover, he even claims that the Bible is not history.  Seriously?  So how the heck did Israel come to be?  Did this nation come out of a fairy tale?  If so, where is Atlantis?  This guy is extremely foolish.  It is no wonder why the organization that he runs, American Atheists only has 5,000 members according to him during the CNN report.  Silverman then presented his "Atheist TV" channel which was an epic fail, see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/08/atheist-tv.html.  He also claims that America is not supposed to be "under God" or "trust in God."  He is clearly ignorant of American history.  Our Declaration of Independence clearly mentions God:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" -http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html

The Constitution is even signed "in the year of our Lord."  God is as American as apple pie, so to speak.   Furthermore, DeWitt is clearly a con artist.  He is using his talent for "preaching" to make money off of atheists.  How can atheists be so foolish to attend an "atheist chapel?"  Seriously guys?! Atheism means a rejection of God and religious belief, not an imitation of the latter.  In regards to the anonymous minister all I can say is that all Christians go through the "Dark Night of the Soul" which is a period of spiritual maturation where the soul feels abandoned by God.  God seems to not exist. All saints have gone through this process and is what the late Christopher Hitchens misinterpreted in Blessed Mother Teresa's writings when she wrote of her doubts.

Richard Dawkins then claims that the world will be better without religion but does not acknowledge that Stalin and other atheist leaders hold the record for the most mass murders.  Their regimes pushed atheism and oppressed human rights. Cuba and China today still oppress their people and commit horrendous crimes in the name of a godless society.  Dawkins also uses what I call the "Leprechaun fallacy" which I refuted here: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2015/03/atheist-nonsense-introduction-part-i.html.  I feel bad for these individuals who persist in their ignorance.  There is some underlying psychological issue going on that forces them to be apprehensive towards God and religion.  Granted, some believers do horrible things and sometimes do not represent their faith well (I included); however, this is no reason to stop believing.  We are all sinners and make mistakes.  No religion or faith should be based on the behavior of its followers.

This CNN report gave a glimpse of atheism and what it really is.  It is simply a parody of religious belief.  We are all predisposed to believe in God.  This is part of our genetic makeup.  Atheism is the outlier in nature see: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2014/07/atheists-dont-exist.html.  A claim was made during the report that young people are becoming atheists or leaving religion because of the internet.  This may be because the internet is full of so much misinformation that it is hard to verify what is factual and what is not.  There are many sites such as Wikipedia, blogs and the like with fabrications and other distortions.  Take this "news" article claiming Dr. Steven Hawkins endorsed intelligent design, see: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/stephen-hawkins-admits-intelligent-design-is-highly-probable/.  A lot of people are falling for that fake news and believing it!  This is an example of how careful we must be when searching for things on the internet.  Young people are impressionable and will believe anything that may be presented as "cool" or rebellious.  Atheism is a rebellious social phenomenon so it is attractive to young people who want to go against the "status quo." This show reminded me of one of the reasons I left atheism behind: it is silly.  Atheism is just an opium for the contrarian.  It is based on speculative reasoning that fails to sustain itself logically.                





More info:
http://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/03/17/exp-cnn-creative-marketing-atheists-inside-the-world-of-non-believers.cnn
 http://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/03/17/exp-cnn-creative-marketing-atheists-inside-the-world-of-non-believers.cnn

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Massacre in Nigeria Ignored




Days before the attack at Charlie Hebdo, a massacre began in Nigeria. The extremist group Boko Hiram has been attacking towns in northeast Nigeria since early January.  They have slaughtered thousands of men, women and children by using gunfire and even children as suicide bombers.  The entire thing is horrific.

What is also terrifying is the media blackout on this massacre. CNN, Fox, MSNBC and others have been focusing on the attack in France and have covered this massacre in Nigeria very little.  This is very disturbing.  Some are calling this racist because more coverage is being given to European news than news occuring in Africa. There have been no marches in support of those being massacred; no collective unity among government leaders showing solidarity with the people of Nigeria. This is unfortunate indeed.

Let us pray for the Nigeria people who are going through a crisis which the world is turning a blind eye to.  I hope world leaders will speak out more and major news networks will cover this massacre as much as they have covered the Charlie Hebdo attacks.










Source:

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/nigeria-satellite-images-show-horrific-scale-boko-haram-attack-baga-2015-01-15

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/01/15/377408586/satellite-images-show-vast-destruction-of-boko-haram-attack-in-nigeria

http://globalnews.ca/news/1776017/why-coverage-of-the-paris-shooting-has-overshadowed-a-massacre-in-nigeria/

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/16/boko-haram-massacre-how-nigeria-deals-with-trauma

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/nigeria/11352329/At-least-six-dead-as-violence-hits-Nigeria.html

http://www.democracynow.org/2015/1/16/as_nigerian_massacre_evidence_grows_questions

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/16/nigeria-boko-haram-massacre_n_6473416.html

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Atheist Mom Converted by Daughter


A twelve year old child prodigy who taught herself how to paint and is also picking up piano quickly has aided in the conversion of her mother who was an atheist.  The girl claims to have had visions of Christ and Heaven and painted them with such great detail that they began to make her mother think:  Where did these images come from and how did her daughter get such a detailed image from her imagination?

This is an interesting story considering atheists love to claim that people are born atheists and that in order for one to believe in God, one must be indoctrinated.  This brings doubt to this claim because this young girl came from an atheist background with no knowledge or exposure to religious belief.  Was this the VMAT2 gene working or was it God who was really giving this young girl these images to paint?

In any event, the mother left atheism behind.    





Source:

http://ipost.christianpost.com/news/twelve-year-old-with-atheist-mom-paints-shocking-pictures-of-heaven-and-jesus-and-wins-her-to-christ-11206/

http://nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/2239/Akiane-Kramarik-Child-Prodigy.aspx

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Benghazi attack Flip Flop

While Americans and others were remembering 911 victims, another tragedy took place in Benghazi, Libya.  USA Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his entourage were bombarded by militants.  They did not survive.  

At first, the White House placed blamed on a YouTube video "The Innocence of Muslims" which is a parody of the prophet Muhammad.  Violent anti-American protests began spiraling out of control.

After close examination, the White House changed its story and is now blaming it on a planned terrorist attack which was to coincide with the 11th anniversary of 911.

Which one is it?  An attack in retaliation for the YouTube video or a planned terrorist attack?

This is troubling indeed and shows how out of touch Obama's administration is in regards to foreign policy.  To add to the drama, CNN apparently had in its possession Ambassador Stevens' journal which it used as a source prior to returning it to his family.  Why wasn't this journal left alone or at least given to the CIA?  Shame on CNN.

Muslims who are now violently protesting most likely were not aware of the YouTube video until the White House mentioned it.  If this is the case, then the Obama administration has a lot of blood on its hands.

These people are rioting, killing one another and destroying property all because of a video that was promoted inadvertently by the Obama administration - or was it?  

Congress needs to launch an investigation.
    

Source:

http://news.yahoo.com/benghazi-attack-why-white-house-changed-story-173746701.html

http://twitchy.com/2012/09/22/sick-cnn-admits-concealing-critical-evidence-in-ambassador-stevens-murder/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-state-dept-blasts-cnn-report-stevens-diary-17299735#.UF5gcrJlSAI

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/22/cnn-christopher-stevens-personal-journal-libya_n_1905650.html?ir=Media

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443890304578012473529847226.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-state-dept-blasts-cnn-report-stevens-diary-17299735#.UF5gcLJlSAI

Friday, June 22, 2012

CNN ratings low


CNN's ratings have plummeted.  Only a few hundred thousand are tuning in to watch prime time programming.  The reason is obvious.  CNN does not offer objective reporting.  The Liberal slant is so obvious that people just don't care much for it.

Just by watching any of its programming, one will see that the network is Pro abortion, Pro Obama, Pro Homosexual, etc.


Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/22/cnn-ratings-low-primetime_n_1537243.html

Friday, February 10, 2012

Roland Martin - Cnn




CNN suspended Roland Martin for making what some believe was a homophobic remark on Twitter after the showing of an underwear commercial featuring Soccer star David Beckham during the Superbowl 2012.   Roland tweeted:


While the tweet is a bit violent by encouraging "smacking," I don't see how anyone can be offended by this.  No heterosexual male would enjoy watching other men in underwear.  Roland is using language typical of a male who does not have same-sex attraction.  He is entitled to his free speech.

Shame on CNN for suspending him for exercising his First amendment rights.
America is becoming a scary place.  We are slowly being censored little by little.  We need to restore the Constitution before it is too late.  




Source: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/08/10354257-cnn-suspends-commentator-roland-martin-over-beckham-ad-tweets

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1557) Jesus (722) God (707) Bible (595) Atheism (393) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (274) Apologetics (254) Science (232) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (89) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (73) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Biology (47) Health (47) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Morality (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) CUNY (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Massimo Pigliucci (10) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)