Showing posts with label Bishop Joseoph Strickland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bishop Joseoph Strickland. Show all posts

Friday, November 14, 2025

A Bold Declaration: Bishop Strickland’s Challenge to Pope Leo XIV and the U.S. Bishops

A Bold Declaration: Bishop Strickland’s Challenge to Pope Leo XIV and the U.S. Bishops

Posted on November 14, 2025, 06:30 PM PST

On this crisp November afternoon, Bishop Joseph Strickland, the emeritus bishop of Tyler, Texas, has once again thrust himself into the spotlight with a fiery X post that reverberates with the urgency of a prophetic call. Accompanied by a striking image of a lone wolf standing resolute amidst a flock of sheep, Strickland’s message is a direct declamation against Pope Leo XIV and his fellow American bishops. Issued at 12:26 PM PST today (Post ID: 1989309016342753727), this statement marks a significant escalation in his ongoing critique of the Catholic Church’s leadership, blending biblical fervor with a pointed accusation of moral failure. He issued a declension.

The Declaration: A Call to Choose Sides

In his post, Strickland invokes the spirit of the prophet Elijah, asking, “How long will you halt between two masters?” He demands that Pope Leo XIV, the Vatican Curia, and the U.S. bishops choose unequivocally between Christ and the world. His words are unsparing: he accuses them of profaning the sanctuary, betraying the Cross, and harming “the little ones”—a term he uses to encompass both the faithful and vulnerable children caught in global crises. He specifically condemns the bishops for turning the Holy Mass into a “bauble” for worldly schemes, welcoming sinful lifestyles without repentance, and ignoring the lawlessness enabled by open border policies, which he links to rapes, murders, and the exploitation of migrants.

Strickland’s rhetoric escalates further with a vivid metaphor: a “massive stockpile of millstones” awaits distribution—one for the Pope, a truckload for the Curia, and cargo ships full for the bishops—echoing Jesus’ warning in Matthew 18:6 about those who lead the little ones astray. This is not a subtle critique; it is a public rebuke, a declaration of war against what he perceives as a betrayal of Catholic doctrine.

 Why Strickland Is Right to Voice Concerns

Bishop Strickland’s concerns cannot be dismissed outright. His post highlights several pressing issues that resonate with many traditional Catholics. The inclusion of openly gay couples in sacred rites, such as the recent confirmation ceremony at St. Patrick’s Cathedral involving ABC anchor David Muir and his same-sex spouse—officiated with the involvement of Jesuit priest James Martin—has sparked widespread debate. Strickland’s intervention at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) meeting in Baltimore on November 12, 2025, where he raised this issue, reflects a legitimate worry about doctrinal consistency. Similarly, his reference to the exploitation of unaccompanied minors at the border, supported by whistleblower testimonies from 2024 (e.g., Thread 2, Post 1811472054178447452), points to a real humanitarian crisis exacerbated by inadequate vetting processes, as documented in reports from the HHS Office of the Inspector General.

As a bishop removed from his post by Pope Francis in 2023 for his outspoken criticism, Strickland has a history of championing Eucharistic devotion and defending traditional teachings. His willingness to speak when others remain silent—especially on the trafficking and abuse of children—lends credibility to his voice. The silence of many bishops, as noted in his post and echoed by supporters like @BlueCrab, suggests a failure of leadership that demands attention. In a Church where scandals have eroded trust, his call for shepherds to protect the flock rather than tiptoe around wolves is a clarion call that many find compelling.



 The Risk of Scandal and the Shadow of Martin Luther

However, while Strickland’s concerns are valid, his approach carries significant risks. His public denunciation of the Pope and bishops, framed in such absolutist terms, risks causing scandal within the Church. By naming Pope Leo XIV and threatening millstones, he challenges the unity of the Catholic hierarchy, potentially alienating the faithful and deepening existing divisions. The image of the wolf among sheep, while powerful, could be interpreted as casting the Pope and bishops as predators—a portrayal that, intentional or not, undermines the respect due to their office.

This boldness draws an uncomfortable parallel to Martin Luther, the 16th-century reformer whose Ninety-Five Theses sparked the Protestant Reformation. Like Luther, Strickland questions papal authority and accuses Church leaders of compromising truth for worldly gain. Luther’s challenge to Pope Leo X over indulgences led to his excommunication in 1521, and while Strickland was already removed from his diocese, his current stance could be seen as flirting with schism. Historical parallels are imperfect, but the comparison is apt: Luther’s actions, though rooted in a desire for reform, fractured the Church, and Strickland’s rhetoric could similarly inspire a breakaway movement among traditionalists. Critics, such as @FrTotleben92742, warn of a “folk hero problem” where such figures, by claiming to be the sole bearers of truth, justify divisive tactics that harm the broader community.

 A Call for Balance

Bishop Strickland is correct to voice concerns about doctrinal drift and the protection of the vulnerable. The Church must address the scandals he highlights—whether liturgical abuses or border crises—with transparency and action. Yet, his method risks mirroring Luther’s rebellion rather than Christ’s redemptive patience. The faithful deserve shepherds who confront sin, but also those who foster unity. Strickland’s passion is a gift, but it must be tempered with humility to avoid becoming a catalyst for division.

As Catholics, we are called to pray for our leaders, including Pope Leo XIV and the U.S. bishops, that they may lead with courage and fidelity. We should also support Strickland’s call to protect the little ones, advocating for reforms like DNA testing for sponsors of unaccompanied minors, as suggested by whistleblower Deborah White (Thread 2, Post 1812199856494071913). The Church’s strength lies in its ability to balance truth with charity—may this moment be a turning point toward that ideal.


What are your thoughts? Share them in the comments, and let’s continue this vital conversation.

---


Note: This blog post reflects the author’s analysis based on the provided X post and related context as of November 14, 2025, 06:20 PM PST. For further details, consider exploring the linked X threads or contacting the author for a deeper dive into the issues raised.

Saturday, August 16, 2025

The Hacking of Bishop Joseph Strickland’s X Account: A Tale of Digital Vulnerability

The Hacking of Bishop Joseph Strickland’s X Account: A Tale of Digital Vulnerability

In the digital age, even prominent religious figures are not immune to cybercrime. Bishop Joseph Strickland, the former bishop of Tyler, Texas, and a well-known voice in traditionalist Catholic circles, has faced multiple incidents of his X account being compromised. These events, occurring in 2025, highlight the growing threat of cyberattacks targeting influential individuals and the broader implications for online security within religious communities. This blog post explores the timeline of the hacking incidents, their impact, and the lessons they offer for safeguarding digital identities.


 The First Incident: March 2025

On March 3, 2025, Bishop Strickland found himself locked out of his X account, which boasted over 215,000 followers at the time. A fraudulent account began using his name to promote a fake cryptocurrency called “$CHRIST coin.” This scam was particularly insidious, leveraging the bishop’s reputation as a trusted religious figure to deceive followers into investing in a nonexistent digital currency. In a statement to LifeSiteNews, Bishop Strickland clarified, “I have been locked out of my X account since March 3, 2025. I am attempting to resolve the issue with X but in the meantime I’ve been informed that there is a post on X claiming that I am promoting a bit coin. It is NOT ME and I have no knowledge of this bit coin promotion.” He urged his followers to spread awareness of the fraud and emphasized his efforts to resolve the issue to prevent anyone from being defrauded.

This incident underscored the vulnerability of public figures to impersonation scams, particularly those involving cryptocurrencies, which have become a common tool for cybercriminals. The use of Bishop Strickland’s identity to promote a fake coin not only threatened financial harm to his followers but also damaged his reputation as a figure of moral authority.


 The Second Incident: August 2025

Just months later, on August 16, 2025, Bishop Strickland’s X account was hacked again. This time, the breach was even more egregious, with the account posting blasphemous messages, cryptocurrency promotions, and other content clearly not authored by the bishop. According to InfoVaticana, these posts were a stark departure from Strickland’s usual messages of faith and doctrine, reflecting an “evident hackeo” (evident hacking). The content was described as escalating in severity over several days, with some posts containing explicit material, as noted by an X user who observed a worsening trend in the hacked content.

The August hack prompted swift reactions from supporters. One X user, @KeithFournier7, posted on August 16, 2025, stating, “Bishop Joseph Strickland’s X (twitter) account has been both hacked and impersonated by someone who is obviously an evil person seeking to harm this holy, good successor of the Apostles. This impostor needs to be found and exposed. Please, report it.” The outcry from Strickland’s followers highlighted the emotional and spiritual toll of the hack, as many saw it as an attack not only on the bishop but also on the values he represents.


 Context: Who is Bishop Joseph Strickland?

To understand why Bishop Strickland’s account might be a target, it’s important to consider his background. Joseph Strickland served as the bishop of Tyler, Texas, from 2012 until his removal by Pope Francis in November 2023. Known for his outspoken defense of traditional Catholic teachings, Strickland gained a significant following on X, where he frequently commented on matters of faith, morality, and church governance. His removal from the Tyler Diocese, following an apostolic visitation prompted by his criticisms of Pope Francis, made him a polarizing figure. Despite his ousting, Strickland maintained a strong online presence, with his X following growing to over 215,000 by late 2024, far surpassing the Catholic population of his former diocese.

Strickland’s prominence in conservative Catholic circles likely made his account an attractive target for hackers. His large, engaged audience provided a platform for scammers to reach potential victims, while his controversial status may have drawn the attention of malicious actors seeking to undermine his influence or sow discord among his followers.


 The Broader Implications

The hacking of Bishop Strickland’s X account is part of a larger trend of cyberattacks targeting public figures and institutions. For comparison, in January 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) X account was compromised through a SIM-swapping attack, leading to a false announcement about Bitcoin Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that temporarily spiked Bitcoin prices. This incident, which resulted in the arrest of an Alabama man, demonstrates how hackers exploit trusted accounts to manipulate markets or public perception.

For religious communities, these incidents raise unique concerns. Social media platforms like X are increasingly vital for clergy to communicate with their followers, share spiritual guidance, and counter misinformation. However, they also expose religious leaders to risks such as reputational damage, financial scams targeting their audiences, and the spread of content that contradicts their values. The blasphemous posts on Strickland’s account, for instance, could alienate followers or fuel distrust in online religious discourse.

Moreover, the hacks highlight the sophistication of modern cyberattacks. While the exact methods used to compromise Strickland’s account are unclear, techniques like phishing, SIM-swapping, or password breaches are common in such cases. As one X user noted in a unrelated post about hacking, even decentralized systems are vulnerable if users fall prey to social engineering attacks like phishing, which manipulate individuals into revealing sensitive information.


 Lessons for Online Security

The repeated targeting of Bishop Strickland’s X account offers several lessons for individuals and organizations, particularly those in the public eye:


1. Strengthen Account Security: Public figures should use strong, unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication (2FA) to protect their accounts. Avoiding SMS-based 2FA, which is vulnerable to SIM-swapping, in favor of app-based or hardware-based authentication can enhance security.


2. Educate Followers: Religious leaders and their communities should educate followers about recognizing scams, such as cryptocurrency promotions or posts that deviate from a figure’s usual tone or content. Quick reporting of suspicious activity, as urged by Strickland’s supporters, can help mitigate damage.


3. Monitor and Respond Promptly: Regularly monitoring account activity and having a plan to address hacks—such as public statements or collaboration with platform support—can limit the impact of a breach. Strickland’s proactive communication through LifeSiteNews in March 2025 helped clarify the situation for his followers.


4. Raise Awareness of Cyber Risks: Religious institutions should invest in cybersecurity training to protect their leaders and members from phishing, impersonation, and other digital threats. As Strickland himself noted in the August 2025 hack coverage, he would need to seek “the advice of a good computer expert” to safeguard his online presence.


 Conclusion

The hacking of Bishop Joseph Strickland’s X account in 2025 serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in our digital world. For a figure like Strickland, whose influence extends far beyond his former diocese, these incidents threaten not only personal reputation but also the trust of a global online community. By understanding the nature of these attacks and taking proactive steps to enhance security, religious leaders can better protect their digital platforms and continue their missions without disruption. As cyberattacks grow more sophisticated, the faithful and their shepherds must remain vigilant to ensure that their voices of truth are not silenced or distorted by malicious actors.








UPDATE August 19, 2025 8:40 PM, Bishop Strickland has created a new X account:

 

https://x.com/BishStrick














Sources  

- InfoVaticana. “Hackean la cuenta de X del obispo Strickland.” August 16, 2025.  [](https://infovaticana.com/2025/08/16/hackean-la-cuenta-de-x-del-obispo-strickland/)

- LifeSiteNews. “WARNING: Fraudulent X account is attempting to use Bishop Strickland’s identity to sell crypto.” March 6, 2025.  [](https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/warning-fraudulent-x-account-is-attempting-to-use-bishop-stricklands-identity-to-sell-crypto)

- X Post by @KeithFournier7. August 16, 2025.  

- X Post by @SarahisCensored. August 7, 2025.  

- United States Department of Justice. “Alabama Man Arrested for Role in Securities and Exchange Commission X Account Hack.” October 17, 2024.  [](https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/alabama-man-arrested-role-securities-and-exchange-commission-x-account-hack)

- Catholic Review. “Ousted Texas bishop attacks Pope Francis, accuses U.S. bishops of silence amid ‘false messages’.” November 13, 2024.  [](https://catholicreview.org/ousted-texas-bishop-attacks-pope-francis-accuses-u-s-bishops-of-silence-amid-false-messages/)

- Wikipedia. “Joseph Strickland.” May 13, 2025.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Strickland)

Sacerdotus TV LIveStream

Labels

Catholic Church (1555) Jesus (722) God (705) Bible (595) Atheism (391) Jesus Christ (378) Pope Francis (342) Liturgy of the Word (311) Atheist (272) Apologetics (252) Science (231) Christianity (198) LGBT (148) Theology (141) Liturgy (134) Blessed Virgin Mary (119) Abortion (97) Gay (95) Prayer (94) Pope Benedict XVI (91) Philosophy (89) Rosa Rubicondior (82) Traditionalists (78) Vatican (74) Psychology (72) Physics (70) Christmas (64) Holy Eucharist (61) Christian (59) New York City (59) President Obama (59) Protestant (52) Vatican II (49) Health (47) Biology (46) Politics (46) Women (44) Gospel (41) Racism (40) Supreme Court (35) Baseball (34) Illegal Immigrants (32) Pope John Paul II (32) NYPD (31) Death (30) priests (30) Astrophysics (27) Jewish (27) Priesthood (27) Religious Freedom (27) Space (27) Eucharist (26) Morality (26) Donald Trump (24) Evangelization (24) Christ (22) Evil (22) First Amendment (21) Pro Abortion (19) Child Abuse (17) Divine Mercy (17) Marriage (17) Pedophilia (17) Pro Choice (17) Easter Sunday (16) Holy Trinity (16) Police (16) Autism (14) Gender Theory (14) Pentecostals (14) Sacraments (14) Angels (13) Poverty (13) Blog (12) Cognitive Psychology (12) Muslims (12) September 11 (12) CUNY (11) Hispanics (11) Pope Paul VI (11) academia (11) Evidence (9) Hell (9) Massimo Pigliucci (9) Personhood (9) Podcast (9) Barack Obama (8) Big Bang Theory (8) Evangelicals (8) Human Rights (8) Humanism (8) Condoms (7) David Viviano (7) Eastern Orthodox (7) Ellif_dwulfe (7) NY Yankees (7) Spiritual Life (7) Encyclical (6) Gender Dysphoria Disorder (6) Babies (5) Baby Jesus (5) Catholic Bloggers (5) Cyber Bullying (5) Donations (5) Pope Pius XII (5) The Walking Dead (5) Ephebophilia (4) Plenary Indulgence (4) Pluto (4) Pope John XXIII (4) Death penalty (3) Founding Fathers (3) Dan Arel (2) Freeatheism (2) Oxfam (2) Penn Jillette (2) Pew Research Center (2) Cursillo (1) Dan Savage (1) Divine Providence (1) Fear The Walking Dead (1) Pentecostales (1)