Questions Protestants Can’t Answer: Cracks in the Sola Scriptura Foundation
Protestantism hinges on sola scriptura—Scripture alone as the ultimate authority. It’s a rallying cry that broke from Rome 500 years ago, promising clarity and purity. But dig into the details, and the cracks show. Where does the Bible define its own canon? Who gets to interpret it? Why trust a Reformation rewrite over 1,500 years of tradition? On March 25, 2025, as we reflect on faith’s roots, here are ten questions Protestants can wrestle with but can’t fully answer—gaps that sola scriptura leaves dangling. Try tackling these without leaning on tradition you claim to reject—Catholic answers wait in the wings.
1. Where in the Bible Does It List the Canon of Scripture?
The Bible’s a collection—66 books for Protestants, 73 for Catholics—but where’s the table of contents? No verse says, “Here’s the list: Genesis to Revelation.” The canon emerged from Church councils (e.g., Hippo, 393 AD; Carthage, 397 AD), not Scripture itself. Second Timothy 3:16—“All Scripture is God-breathed”—assumes a canon but doesn’t define it. How do you know Luther didn’t ditch the right books (e.g., deuterocanonicals) if the Bible’s silent? Tradition set it—Protestants borrow it but can’t source it biblically.
2. Who Had Authority to Decide the Canon Before the Bible Was Complete?
New Testament books were written decades apart—Mark (60 AD) to Revelation (95 AD). Early Christians had no “Bible” for years—oral tradition and partial texts ruled. Who decided John’s Gospel made it but not the Gospel of Thomas? Bishops and councils did, guided by the Spirit (John 16:13). If Scripture’s your sole rule, how do you trust a pre-Scripture Church’s call without admitting extra-biblical authority?
3. Why Accept the New Testament Canon but Reject the Church That Formed It?
Protestants take the 27 New Testament books—fine-tuned by the Catholic Church at councils like Rome (382 AD)—but ditch the institution behind them. If the Church was corrupt enough to warrant the Reformation, why trust its canon picks? Matthew 16:18—“On this rock I will build my Church”—suggests Christ’s Bride didn’t fumble the Word. How do you square that?
4. How Can Sola Scriptura Be Biblical When the Bible Never Mentions It?
“Sola scriptura” is the Protestant bedrock—Scripture’s the only infallible rule. But where’s the verse? Second Timothy 3:16-17 says Scripture’s “useful” and equips us—not that it’s solo. First Corinthians 11:2 praises tradition: “Hold to the traditions I delivered.” No biblical author claims “Scripture alone.” If it’s not in the Bible, isn’t it a man-made doctrine—ironic for a sola stance?
5. How Do You Interpret Scripture Without an Authoritative Guide?
Protestants say “Scripture interprets itself”—yet 40,000 denominations disagree on baptism, salvation, the Eucharist. Second Peter 1:20 warns, “No prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation.” Without a referee, chaos reigns—Luther and Calvin split fast. The Catholic Magisterium claims Peter’s keys (Matthew 16:19)—how do you settle disputes biblically without one?
6. Why Did Early Christians Use Tradition and Councils, Not Just Scripture?
Acts 15’s Jerusalem Council settled circumcision—not by Scripture alone (which was mixed, e.g., Genesis 17 vs. Galatians 5), but by apostolic authority. Ignatius (107 AD) and Irenaeus (180 AD) leaned on tradition and bishops (Against Heresies). If the first Christians needed more than a book, why ditch that model? “Stand firm and hold to the traditions” (2 Thessalonians 2:15)—how do you ignore this?
7. Where Does the Bible Say to Reject the Deuterocanonical Books?
Luther axed seven Old Testament books (e.g., Tobit, Maccabees)—the deuterocanonicals—calling them “not Scripture.” But Jesus and the apostles used the Septuagint, which included them (e.g., Hebrews 11:35 echoes 2 Maccabees 7). The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm their antiquity. No verse excludes them—Luther’s bias did. How do you justify that cut biblically?
8. How Can You Claim Apostolic Authority Without Apostolic Succession?
Protestants preach “back to the Bible,” but the apostles passed authority via succession—Timothy got it from Paul (2 Timothy 1:6). Clement (96 AD) and Ignatius document bishops as heirs (Letter to the Smyrnaeans). If Scripture’s your rule, where’s the verse ending succession? Matthew 16:18’s “rock” implies continuity—how do you break it without breaking the Bible?
9. Why Accept Sunday Worship If It’s Not Explicitly Biblical?
Saturday’s the Sabbath (Exodus 20:8)—yet Protestants worship Sunday, tied to Christ’s resurrection (Acts 20:7). No verse mandates the switch; Church tradition did (Council of Laodicea, ~363 AD). If sola scriptura rules, why lean on a Catholic shift? “Do this in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19) doesn’t set days—how do you square that?
10. How Do You Explain Unity Without a Visible Church?
Jesus prayed “that they may be one” (John 17:21)—Protestantism’s splintered into thousands of groups. Ephesians 4:5 says “one Lord, one faith, one baptism”—where’s the unity? The Catholic Church claims visibility and oneness via Peter’s line (Matthew 16:18). If Scripture’s enough, why the chaos? How do you reconcile that biblically?
The Challenge
Protestants might dodge—“Scripture’s clear to the faithful” or “tradition’s corrupt.” But these questions sting because sola scriptura can’t self-validate—its canon, authority, and practice lean on the Church it rejects. On March 25, 2025, as Lent deepens, “Test everything” (1 Thessalonians 5:21) cuts both ways. Catholicism’s got answers— apostolic roots, councils, tradition. Protestants? Crickets or contradictions. Can you answer these without borrowing what you deny? Drop your take—I’m all ears.
Sources:
- Geisler, Norman & MacKenzie, Ralph. Roman Catholics and Evangelicals. 1995.
- Kelly, J.N.D. Early Christian Doctrines. 1978.
- Schaff, Philip. History of the Christian Church. 1882-1910.
- Cross, F.L. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. 2005.
- Irenaeus. Against Heresies. 180 AD.
- Ignatius. Letter to the Smyrnaeans. 107 AD.
- Bible (RSV): Matthew 16:18-19, 2 Timothy 3:16-17, 1 Corinthians 11:2, etc.
This post poses ten questions that probe Protestant reliance on sola scriptura, using Scripture, history, and logic to highlight inconsistencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading and for your comment. All comments are subject to approval. They must be free of vulgarity, ad hominem and must be relevant to the blog posting subject matter.