17th Sunday in Ordinary Time: Prayer & Consequences of Sin

Reflection on the Catholic Readings for the Seventeenth Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year C – July 27, 2025

The readings for July 27, 2025, the Seventeenth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C), invite us to reflect deeply on prayer, intercession, and the consequences of sin. The readings are Genesis 18:20-32, Colossians 2:12-14, and Luke 11:1-13. The first reading recounts Abraham’s intercession for Sodom, the second highlights Christ’s redemptive work, and the Gospel presents Jesus teaching the Lord’s Prayer, emphasizing persistence in prayer and trust in God’s providence. This reflection will address the true nature of Sodom’s sin, correct a recent misrepresentation, and expound on the Lord’s Prayer, including its Aramaic roots.

---

The Sin of Sodom: A Biblical and Patristic Perspective

The first reading from Genesis 18:20-32 describes God’s intention to investigate the “outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah” due to their “very grave” sin. Abraham intercedes, pleading for God to spare the cities if even ten righteous people are found. Contrary to modern reinterpretations, the sin of Sodom was not merely a lack of hospitality but included grave sexual immorality, specifically homosexual acts, as understood by both Scripture and Church tradition.

Biblical scholarship supports this view. Genesis 19:4-11 details the men of Sodom demanding to “know” Lot’s male guests, a term widely recognized in Hebrew (yada) as implying sexual intent in this context. Jude 1:7 further clarifies that Sodom and Gomorrah “indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire,” explicitly linking their sin to sexual perversion. Ezekiel 16:49-50 mentions Sodom’s pride, excess, and neglect of the poor but culminates in their committing “abomination” (to’ebah), a term used in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 to describe homosexual acts as detestable to God.

The Church Fathers consistently interpreted Sodom’s sin as sexual immorality, particularly homosexuality. St. Augustine, in City of God (Book XVI, Chapter 30), refers to Sodom’s “unnatural lusts” as a primary cause of divine judgment. St. John Chrysostom, in his Homilies on Genesis (Homily 42), condemns the “lawless love” of Sodom’s men, emphasizing their pursuit of unnatural relations. St. Jude’s epistle, as interpreted by early Christian writers like Clement of Alexandria, reinforces this understanding, linking Sodom’s punishment to sexual sin.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 2357) aligns with this tradition, stating that homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered” and cannot be approved, citing Genesis 19 among other Scriptures. The Church’s teaching, rooted in both Old and New Testament revelation, affirms that Sodom’s destruction was a consequence of grave moral sins, including homosexuality, rather than a mere failure of hospitality.

Recently, Fr. James Martin, in a post on X earlier this week, suggested that Sodom’s sin was primarily about inhospitality, downplaying its sexual dimension. He urged priests to address this topic in their homilies for today. This interpretation, while appealing to modern sensibilities, diverges from the consistent witness of Scripture, the Church Fathers, and magisterial teaching. As noted in posts on X (e.g., @Sacerdotus, @malonep18), such a view risks distorting the biblical narrative and Church tradition, which clearly identify sexual immorality as central to Sodom’s condemnation. While hospitality is a Christian virtue, reducing Sodom’s sin to this alone ignores the textual and historical evidence, leading to a revisionist understanding that Pius XII’s Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) would caution against, as it upholds the Vulgate’s reliability in matters of faith and morals, including its condemnation of sodomy.

See more here:

Sacerdotus: Fr. James Martin SJ Revisionist Take on Sodom & Gomorrah

Sacerdotus: Rainbow Delusion II

Sacerdotus: The Rainbow Delusion

The Lord’s Prayer: A Call to Intimacy and Trust

In the Gospel (Luke 11:1-13), Jesus teaches the disciples to pray the Lord’s Prayer after they observe His intimate communion with the Father. This prayer, often called the Our Father or Pater Noster, is the cornerstone of Christian prayer, encapsulating our relationship with God and our dependence on His will. Luke’s version is concise yet profound: “Father, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come. Give us each day our daily bread, and forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive everyone who is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation” (Luke 11:2-4).

The prayer begins with “Father” (Aramaic: Abba), a term of intimacy Jesus used to address God, reflecting a familial bond. St. Paul echoes this in Romans 8:15, noting that the Spirit enables us to cry “Abba, Father.” This opening sets the tone for the prayer as an act of trust and surrender to God’s holiness and kingdom. The petitions that follow—hallowing God’s name, seeking His kingdom, daily bread, forgiveness, and protection—orient us toward God’s primacy while acknowledging our needs as a community of faith.

In Aramaic, the language Jesus likely used, the Lord’s Prayer is preserved in the Peshitta, an early Syriac translation of the New Testament. Here is an approximate transliteration of Luke’s version:

Abun d-bashmayya, nithqaddash shmakh, tethe malkuthakh. Lakhman d-sunkanan yomana hab lan yoma dhen. W-shbuq lan khawbayn, aykana d-aph khnan shbaqin l-khayyabin lan. W-la ta’lan l-nesyona.

Translation:

Our Father who is in heaven, holy be Your name, Your kingdom come. Our daily bread give us today. And forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us. And lead us not into temptation.

This Aramaic rendering underscores the prayer’s simplicity and directness, reflecting Jesus’ teaching style. The phrase Abun d-bashmayya (Our Father in heaven) emphasizes God’s transcendence and intimacy, a balance central to Christian spirituality. The petition for “daily bread” (lakhman d-sunkanan) likely refers to both physical sustenance and spiritual nourishment, possibly alluding to the Eucharist, as some Church Fathers like St. Cyprian suggested in On the Lord’s Prayer. The call to forgive “as we forgive” highlights the reciprocal nature of mercy, a theme Jesus reinforces in the parable of the persistent friend (Luke 11:5-8), which teaches perseverance in prayer.

The Church Fathers, such as Tertullian (On Prayer) and St. Augustine (Sermon on the Mount), saw the Lord’s Prayer as a comprehensive guide to Christian life. Tertullian called it “the summary of the whole Gospel,” encapsulating worship, petition, and moral commitment. Augustine emphasized its communal nature, noting that “our” and “us” bind believers together in praying for the world’s needs, not just personal desires.

Connecting the Readings: Intercession and Redemption

The readings converge on the theme of prayerful intercession. Abraham’s bold dialogue with God in Genesis prefigures Christ’s ultimate intercession, as described in Colossians 2:12-14, where He “canceled the record of debt” through His cross. The Lord’s Prayer, taught by Jesus, equips us to participate in this intercessory mission, praying for God’s will, sustenance, forgiveness, and protection for all humanity. Just as Abraham pleaded for the righteous in Sodom, we are called to intercede for a world marred by sin, trusting in God’s mercy while upholding His truth.

The story of Sodom reminds us of the consequences of unrepented sin, but it also highlights God’s patience and willingness to hear intercession. The Lord’s Prayer, with its Aramaic roots, anchors us in Jesus’ own practice of prayer, inviting us into a transformative relationship with the Father. As we pray, we must hold fast to the Church’s teachings, resisting reinterpretations that dilute the moral clarity of Scripture, and instead embrace the call to holiness and intercession for a world in need of redemption.

Sources:

- Scripture: Genesis 18:20-32, Colossians 2:12-14, Luke 11:1-13, Jude 1:7, Ezekiel 16:49-50, Leviticus 18:22, 20:13.

- Church Fathers: Augustine, City of God (Book XVI); Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis (Homily 42); Tertullian, On Prayer; Cyprian, On the Lord’s Prayer.

- Church Teaching: Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2357; Pius XII, Divino Afflante Spiritu.

- Biblical Scholarship: Notes on Hebrew yada and to’ebah from standard commentaries (e.g., Anchor Bible, NICOT).

- X Posts: @Sacerdotus, @malonep18 (inconclusive but reflective of sentiment).