Vandalism and Arson Strike Medjugorje

Vandalism and Arson Strike Medjugorje: Desecration at a Global Pilgrimage Site

In the early hours of July 28, 2026, the quiet village of Medjugorje in Bosnia and Herzegovina—one of the most visited Catholic pilgrimage destinations in the world—was jolted by acts of vandalism and arson that damaged sacred images and an outdoor altar. Police responded to reports beginning around 4:30 a.m. local time. Statues of the Virgin Mary, known locally as Gospa or Our Lady, at key prayer sites were defaced with black paint and offensive graffiti. An outdoor altar behind St. James Church was set ablaze. The incidents occurred just days before the annual Mladifest youth festival, which typically draws tens of thousands of young pilgrims.

The parish of Medjugorje quickly condemned the damage, cleaned the sites, and kept the shrine open. It urged the faithful to respond with prayer, fasting, and forgiveness rather than anger. A suspect was arrested later that day. Investigators continue to examine the full circumstances and any motive.

This episode has drawn global attention because Medjugorje is not an ordinary village church. For more than four decades it has been associated with reported Marian apparitions that have drawn millions of visitors, sparked conversions, and generated both deep devotion and ongoing debate within the Catholic Church.

 What Happened Overnight

Police in the Čitluk area first received a report at approximately 4:30 a.m. that the statue of Our Lady on Podbrdo (Apparition Hill) had been damaged. The face, hands, and parts of the figure were covered in black paint. Offensive messages appeared on the pedestal and nearby surfaces, including the English phrase “Devil in a skirt,” the word “devil,” “Medjugorje is a deception,” and “Jesus only.” A banner in Polish named the six individuals associated with the reported apparitions—Ivanka, Mirjana, Milka, Vicka, Ivan, and Jakov—and accused them of deception, stating the writer had evidence. Additional markings, including a number and references, were left at the scene. Similar defacement occurred at the Blue Cross (Plavi križ) area, where statues were also painted black and the word “EVIL” appeared on a nearby stone.

Around 5:00 a.m., authorities learned of a fire at the outdoor altar behind St. James Church, a central gathering place for pilgrims. Surveillance footage showed a man approaching the recently renovated altar area. The fire was extinguished without spreading to the church itself, though material damage occurred. Local reports indicated the altar area required cleanup and repair.

By the afternoon of July 28, police had arrested a man in the Ljubuški area (specifically reported near Cerno) on suspicion of involvement. Official statements initially withheld full personal details pending identification procedures, describing him as a 31-year-old foreign national. Subsequent local and regional reporting identified him as Bartłomiej Włodzimierz Krakowiak (also referred to as Bartek), a Polish citizen from Warsaw. The Bosnia and Herzegovina state prosecutor’s office later indicated it would take over the investigation, given the nature of damage to religious sites. Cleanup began almost immediately; volunteers and parish staff restored the prayer spaces so that regular programs could continue. The shrine remained open to pilgrims.

The timing amplified the impact. The 37th International Youth Festival (Mladifest), themed around returning “to the source” and the school of the Madonna, was scheduled to begin August 1 and expected to attract more than 50,000 young people from around the world. Parish statements emphasized that prayer life would proceed normally and invited a response of conversion rather than retaliation.

 The Apparitions and the Shrine

Medjugorje is a small settlement in the Herzegovina region of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in the parish of St. James administered by Franciscan friars of the Herzegovina Province, within the Diocese of Mostar-Duvno. In June 1981, then part of communist Yugoslavia, six local young people—ranging in age from about 10 to 16—reported seeing the Virgin Mary on Podbrdo hill above the hamlet of Bijakovići. The first reports came on June 24, the eve of the feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist. Ivanka Ivanković and Mirjana Dragičević described seeing a luminous figure; others soon joined. The group that became known as the visionaries includes Marija Pavlović-Lunetti, Ivan Dragičević, Vicka Ivanković-Mijatović, Jakov Čolo, Mirjana Dragičević-Soldo, and Ivanka Ivanković-Elez.

According to their accounts, the figure identified herself as the Queen of Peace and called for conversion, prayer, fasting, penance, and peace. Messages emphasized returning to God through the sacraments, reading Scripture, and living the Gospel. Some visionaries have reported ongoing experiences: daily apparitions for a few, monthly or annual for others. Over the decades, thousands of messages have been recorded and disseminated. The parish church of St. James, Apparition Hill (Podbrdo), Cross Mountain (Križevac), and the Blue Cross became focal points of pilgrimage. A large statue of Our Lady of Medjugorje stands on Podbrdo; outdoor altars and prayer spaces accommodate large crowds for Mass, Rosary, Adoration, and confessions.

The phenomenon emerged under a communist regime hostile to public religious expression. Local authorities initially pressured the young people and the Franciscan parish priest. Despite (or because of) restrictions, news spread. Pilgrims began arriving even during the difficult years of the 1990s Bosnian war. After the war, infrastructure grew: hotels, hostels, shops, and expanded church facilities. Estimates of total visitors since 1981 range into the tens of millions; annual figures have often exceeded one million in recent years. The site is frequently ranked among Europe’s major Marian pilgrimage destinations alongside Lourdes and Fatima.

Reported spiritual fruits include conversions, returns to the sacraments (especially Confession and Eucharist), vocations to priesthood and religious life, reconciliations in families, and deepened prayer. Many pilgrims speak of personal healing—physical, emotional, or spiritual. The shrine functions as a place of intense sacramental life rather than solely as a site tied to ongoing private revelations.

 Importance of Medjugorje

Medjugorje matters for several interlocking reasons. First, scale: few contemporary Catholic sites draw comparable numbers of international visitors year after year. Pilgrims come from Europe, the Americas, Asia, Africa, and beyond. Youth festivals such as Mladifest create large-scale gatherings focused on prayer and formation. Second, the consistent emphasis on core Christian practices—daily prayer, fasting, Confession, Eucharist, Scripture—has produced measurable pastoral results that Church authorities have repeatedly noted. Third, its location in a region scarred by ethnic and religious conflict gives the message of the Queen of Peace particular resonance. Calls for reconciliation and forgiveness have been highlighted by successive generations of visitors.

Economically, the pilgrimage economy transformed a rural village into a significant destination within Bosnia and Herzegovina. Spiritually, it has become a reference point for charismatic renewal, Marian devotion, and personal conversion stories across linguistic and national boundaries. Critics have questioned the authenticity of the ongoing claims, financial aspects of the pilgrimage industry, and the role of the visionaries. Supporters point to the fruits: changed lives, increased sacramental practice, and a global network of prayer groups inspired by the reported messages. The site occupies a unique place in contemporary Catholic popular piety precisely because the official evaluation has been cautious yet pastoral.

 Stance of the Catholic Church

The Catholic Church has never issued a definitive declaration that the apparitions are of supernatural origin. Early local investigations under Bishop Pavao Žanić of Mostar-Duvno expressed strong reservations. A 1991 declaration by the Yugoslav Episcopal Conference (the Zadar Declaration) stated that, on the basis of investigations to that point, it could not be affirmed that the events were supernatural apparitions and revelations. Official diocesan pilgrimages were restricted for years.

Pope Benedict XVI established a commission under Cardinal Camillo Ruini. Its work examined the early events and later claims separately. While internal details remained confidential for a time, subsequent reporting indicated positive assessment of the first days’ experiences alongside doubts about later ongoing claims. In 2019, Pope Francis authorized organized pilgrimages to Medjugorje, carefully distinguishing pastoral care of visitors from authentication of the apparitions themselves. A papal envoy and later an Apostolic Visitor were appointed to oversee the pastoral situation.

In September 2024 the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, with the approval of Pope Francis, issued a Note on the spiritual experience connected with Medjugorje. It granted a nihil obstat (nothing obstructs). This recognizes abundant positive fruits—conversions, sacramental life, vocations, reconciliations—and authorizes public acts of devotion and pilgrimages. It explicitly does not declare the phenomena supernatural. The faithful are free to believe or not; they are not obliged. The Note stresses that pilgrimages should focus on encounter with Mary, Queen of Peace, and with Christ through Word, Eucharist, and Adoration, rather than on meetings with the alleged visionaries. Messages may be published with appropriate caveats, and local ecclesiastical authorities retain pastoral responsibility.

This position is consistent with the Church’s broader approach to private revelations: they are never required for the faith, must be judged by their fruits and conformity to doctrine, and do not add to the definitive public revelation of Christ. Medjugorje is treated as a place of authentic Catholic spirituality and Marian devotion even while the supernatural character of the specific claims remains unevaluated in a definitive positive sense.

 Arrests and Motives

A 31-year-old Polish man was arrested in the West Herzegovina Canton on the day of the incidents. Media reports, citing police sources, identified him as Bartłomiej Włodzimierz Krakowiak of Warsaw. Official statements were initially cautious about releasing full identity pending formal procedures. The state-level prosecutor’s office moved to assume the case because of the religious nature of the damaged sites.

Public reporting has highlighted an earlier chapter in the same man’s life. In 2017, then about 22, Krakowiak walked approximately 1,300 kilometers from Warsaw to Medjugorje over 57 days. He documented the journey on social media under the name “Z buta do Maryi” (“On Foot to Mary”), describing it as a response to personal crisis, depression, and a search for spiritual peace after a difficult background that included family problems, addiction, and other struggles. He later spoke publicly about conversion, published a book about the pilgrimage, and appeared in a Polish faith-related film. The contrast between that earlier pilgrimage and the 2026 events has been widely noted in regional and Polish media.

As of the latest available information, investigators have not publicly confirmed a definitive motive. The graffiti and the Polish-language banner accusing the visionaries of deception suggest hostility toward the claimed apparitions themselves or toward the authenticity of the Medjugorje phenomenon. Whether the acts stem from personal disillusionment, ideological opposition, mental health factors, or other causes remains under investigation. Authorities have worked to determine whether the same individual was responsible for all the recorded damage. The parish response has consistently called for prayer for the conversion of those involved rather than speculation or retaliation.

 Aftermath and Continuing Significance

Within hours the damaged sites were being cleaned. The outdoor altar area was restored sufficiently for use, and the prayer program of the parish continued without interruption. Statements from the parish office stressed sadness at the desecration of places of prayer and invited the faithful to answer evil with good. The shrine’s openness to pilgrims was reaffirmed.

The episode underscores both the vulnerability of sacred sites and the resilience of the community that gathers there. Medjugorje’s importance does not rest solely on the unresolved question of the apparitions’ supernatural origin. It rests on the measurable spiritual activity that has taken place there for more than forty years: confessions heard in many languages, Masses celebrated for large international crowds, young people encountering the Gospel, families reconciled, and individuals reporting profound personal change. The 2024 Vatican Note formally recognized those fruits while maintaining theological caution.

In a region still marked by the memory of war and ethnic division, a shrine dedicated to the Queen of Peace continues to attract people seeking conversion and reconciliation. The July 2026 vandalism and arson tested that atmosphere of prayer. The immediate response—cleanup, continued liturgy, and calls for forgiveness—aligned with the messages long associated with the place. Investigations will determine legal accountability. The pastoral life of the shrine proceeds, focused on the sacraments and on Mary’s call, as understood by those who come, to lead people to her Son.

The events of a single night cannot erase decades of pilgrimage. They do, however, serve as a reminder that places of intense devotion can also become targets of hostility. How the Church, the local community, and pilgrims respond will form part of the ongoing story of Medjugorje.

he investigation remains active. Further official updates from Bosnian authorities and the parish will clarify remaining questions of motive and legal process. In the meantime, Medjugorje continues its daily rhythm of prayer.

 References and Further Reading

- Vatican News: Medjugorje parish condemns vandalism, urges prayer and forgiveness – https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2026-07/medjugorje-parish-condemns-vandalism-urges-forgiveness.html

- Fox News coverage of the shrine incident – https://www.foxnews.com/world/world-famous-catholic-shrine-torched-devil-skirt-scrawled-virgin-mary-statue

- OSV News: Medjugorje shrine targeted in overnight vandalism, fire – https://www.osvnews.com/medjugorje-shrine-targeted-in-overnight-vandalism-altar-fire/

- EWTN News report on the vandalism and arrest – https://www.ewtnnews.com/world/europe/vandals-deface-our-lady-statues-set-fire-to-altar-at-medjugorje-shrine

- Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith Note on the spiritual experience connected with Medjugorje (September 2024) and related Vatican News summaries – https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2024-09/pope-francis-ddf-note-nulla-osta-approval-medjugorje-devotion.html

- Catholic Answers and USCCB summaries of the Church’s position – https://www.catholic.com/qa/the-churchs-current-position-on-medjugorje ; https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/vatican-sees-spiritual-value-medjugorje-doesnt-judge-it-supernatural

- Local and regional reporting on the arrest and background (Hercegovina.info, 24sata, and related outlets) detailing the identification of the suspect and prior pilgrimage history.

- Historical overviews of the reported apparitions and pilgrimage development from Catholic News Agency and related sources.

T

Racetrack Pit Crew of Thieves Busted in the Bronx: A Symptom of a Much Larger Crisis

Racetrack Pit Crew of Thieves Busted in the Bronx: A Symptom of a Much Larger Crisis

In a major announcement on April 30, 2026, the Bronx District Attorney’s Office and NYPD revealed the takedown of a sophisticated auto theft ring. Dubbed “Operation Pit Crew,” authorities charged at least 16 suspects with 971 criminal counts for stealing cars, tires, rims, and catalytic converters worth over $1.2 million across New York City.

These brazen thieves operated with military-like precision, often in three-person teams. Masked and gloved, they would pull up in a stolen vehicle between midnight and 5 a.m., jack up cars in seconds, and strip tires and rims using power tools—all in a matter of minutes. They targeted Hondas, Toyotas, and similar reliable vehicles popular among working families. The stolen parts were sold on the black market, including via platforms like Facebook Marketplace, with some vehicles shipped overseas. Many of the suspects have alleged ties to the Trinitarios street gang and connections to the Dominican Republic.

This bust is welcome news, but it barely scratches the surface of a massive, ongoing problem in the Bronx and across NYC. Wheel and rim thefts have become an epidemic, leaving countless vehicles stranded on milk crates or blocks overnight. For working people—many of whom are still making monthly payments on their cars—this is devastating. Not only do they lose mobility essential for commuting to jobs, school, or family obligations, but they now face thousands of dollars in repair and restoration costs for new rims, tires, and related damage. Insurance deductibles and rate hikes add further financial strain to families already stretched thin.

These thefts highlight deeper systemic failures, including the role of illegal immigration in fueling certain crime patterns in New York City. While media and officials often focus attention on migrants from Mexico, Venezuela, and Haiti, groups like Dominican-linked Trinitarios operations are frequently downplayed or ignored in public discourse. This selective emphasis leaves communities vulnerable and prevents honest discussions about enforcement and border security.

I have personally written to Bronx DA Darcel Clark, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, President Donald Trump, Mayor Mamdani, Rep. Ritchie Torres, Assemblymember Oswaldo Feliz, Attorney General Letitia James, and Governor Kathy Hochul to raise awareness about this crisis and the lack of adequate response. Too often, NYPD simply closes auto theft cases without thorough investigation, leaving victims without justice or recourse. The silence and inaction from these officials have been disappointing.

This must change. Law enforcement needs the resources, policies, and political backing to prioritize vehicle crimes, deter repeat offenders, and address root causes head-on.

Hopefully, this problem of rim thefts ends for good. People deserve to park their cars at night with peace of mind, knowing they will find them safe and intact in the morning.

One family I know was directly affected by these thefts and is struggling to cover the expensive repairs. If you can help, please consider donating to their GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/9c4940e42

Stay vigilant, secure your vehicles (wheel locks, steering wheel locks, and parking in well-lit areas help), and demand accountability from leaders. Our communities deserve safer streets.

Related News Reports:

- [NY Post: ‘Racetrack pit crew’ of thieves charged with stealing 250 NYC car parts](https://nypost.com/2026/04/30/us-news/racetrack-pit-crew-of-thieves-charged-with-stealing-250-nyc-car-parts-and-vehicles-totaling-1-2m-bronx-da/)

- [CBS News: Bronx thieves allegedly stole $1.2 million worth of car parts “like a race car pit crew”](https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/operation-pit-crew-bronx-car-part-thieves/)

- Additional coverage on Norwood News and other local outlets detailing the Trinitarios links and scope of the operation.

Grave Desecration in St. Peter’s Basilica: Monstrance Thrown on Ground

Grave Desecration in St. Peter’s Basilica: What We Know About the Blessed Sacrament Chapel Incident

On January 17, 2026, a shocking act of sacrilege took place inside one of the holiest sites in all of Christendom: the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament in St. Peter’s Basilica. According to the reports currently available, an unidentified man climbed onto the altar during a period of Eucharistic adoration and violently threw sacred objects—including candlesticks, the altar cross, and even the monstrance—onto the floor. The Blessed Sacrament was exposed at the time, making the act not only vandalism but a direct profanation of the Eucharistic Lord.

The incident has understandably caused deep concern among Catholics worldwide. Yet what is equally striking is the limited media coverage. As of this writing, only two outlets—LifeSiteNews and Catholic Online News—have reported on this specific desecration. While other Catholic and secular news agencies have covered different desecrations inside St. Peter’s in recent years, this particular event has received almost no attention outside these two sources.

This raises important questions: What exactly happened? Why is the coverage so limited? And what does this say about the state of security, transparency, and reverence within the Vatican today?

We at Sacerdotus have not been able to verify fully this story but will report on it.  

 What Happened Inside the Blessed Sacrament Chapel

According to LifeSiteNews and Catholic Online News, the incident unfolded in the early afternoon on Saturday, January 17. A man entered the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament—an area reserved for prayer and Eucharistic adoration—and managed to climb onto the altar itself. Witnesses say he then began violently throwing sacred objects to the ground, including:

- The altar candlesticks  

- The altar cross  

- The monstrance  

Because the Blessed Sacrament was exposed for adoration, the act constitutes a grave profanation under canon law. Canon 1211 states that when a sacred place or object is seriously violated, public worship cannot continue until a penitential rite of reparation is performed.

According to eyewitness testimony cited by both outlets, such a rite was carried out immediately after the incident. This aligns with standard canonical procedure and underscores the seriousness with which the Church treats desecration of the Eucharist.

However, witnesses also reported that Vatican security personnel attempted to minimize or conceal the event. Some were allegedly instructed to delete videos or refrain from discussing what they saw. While such claims cannot yet be independently verified, they echo similar reports from past incidents inside the basilica.

 A Pattern of Increasingly Bold Desecrations

This is not the first time St. Peter’s Basilica has suffered acts of sacrilege or vandalism in recent years. In fact, the January 17 incident appears to be part of a troubling pattern:

- June 1, 2023: A naked man climbed onto the Altar of the Confession shouting political slogans.  

- February 7, 2025: A Romanian man climbed the same altar, threw candlesticks, and removed the altar cloth.  

- October 10, 2025: A drunk man stripped naked and urinated on the Altar of the Confession.  

These incidents were widely reported by outlets such as Aleteia, CNA, EWTN, and Italian media. But the January 17 desecration is distinct: it occurred not at the main altar but in the Blessed Sacrament Chapel, during adoration, and involved the Eucharist itself.  That makes the lack of broader coverage even more puzzling.

Why Are Only Two Outlets Reporting This?

At the moment, LifeSiteNews and Catholic Online News are the only publications reporting on this specific event. Several explanations are possible:

 1. Vatican Silence

The Vatican has not issued a public statement acknowledging the incident. Without an official press release, many news agencies may be hesitant to publish.

 2. Limited Eyewitness Footage

If security personnel did instruct witnesses to delete videos, as some claim, this would reduce the amount of verifiable evidence available to journalists.

 3. Media Hesitation

Some Catholic and secular outlets may be reluctant to report on internal Vatican disorder, especially when it involves the Eucharist, security failures, or potential administrative negligence.

 4. Confusion With Other Incidents

Because multiple desecrations have occurred in recent years, some journalists may mistakenly assume this report refers to the previously documented urination incident or the earlier altar vandalism.

Whatever the reason, the result is the same: a serious act of sacrilege has gone largely unreported, leaving many Catholics unaware of what happened.

 Security Concerns Inside St. Peter’s

Both LifeSiteNews and Catholic Online News highlight concerns about declining security inside the basilica. According to their reporting, staffing changes, reduced presence of the traditional sampietrini custodians, and administrative decisions within the Fabric of St. Peter have contributed to a less secure environment.

If a man can climb onto the altar of the Blessed Sacrament during adoration—one of the most sacred moments in Catholic worship—this raises urgent questions:

- How was he able to approach the altar?  

- Why was he not stopped sooner?  

- Are security protocols adequate?  

- Is there a reluctance to publicly acknowledge these failures?  

These are not merely administrative issues. They touch on the Church’s responsibility to safeguard the Eucharist and protect the faithful who come to pray.

 A Call for Transparency and Reverence

Regardless of why the incident has received so little coverage, the facts as reported are deeply troubling. A man desecrated the altar of the Blessed Sacrament while the Eucharist was exposed. A rite of reparation was performed. And yet, outside of two outlets, the Catholic world remains largely unaware.

The faithful deserve clarity. The Eucharist deserves protection. And the Church deserves the truth. If the Vatican wishes to restore trust, it must address these incidents openly, strengthen security measures, and reaffirm its commitment to reverence for the Blessed Sacrament.

Silence only deepens confusion.

Source:

Man desecrates altar, Blessed Sacrament inside St. Peter's Basilica - LifeSite

Man Desecrates Altar in St. Peter’s Basilica – Catholic Online News

Man Urinates on Atlar at St. Peter's Basilica

A Profanation in the Heart of Christendom: The Shocking Incident at St. Peter's Altar

Introduction: A Day of Hope Tarnished

October 10, 2025, was meant to be a day of profound spiritual renewal in the Eternal City. The Catholic Church, under the leadership of Pope Leo XIV, had ushered in the Jubilee of Hope earlier that year, drawing millions of pilgrims to Rome for a once-in-a-quarter-century celebration of mercy, forgiveness, and divine grace. The Holy Door of St. Peter's Basilica, that majestic portal symbolizing the passage from sin to salvation, stood wide open, welcoming throngs of the faithful who crossed its threshold with prayers on their lips and hearts full of expectation. Families from every corner of the globe, young couples seeking blessings for their unions, and weary souls burdened by the trials of modern life converged on the Vatican, transforming the vast piazza into a tapestry of cultures united in faith.

Yet, amid this symphony of devotion, a discordant note shattered the reverence. In the late afternoon, as the golden light of a Roman autumn filtered through the basilica's towering windows, an unthinkable act unfolded at the very epicenter of Catholic worship: the high altar of St. Peter's Basilica. A man, his identity shrouded in the initial fog of chaos, ascended the sacred platform—known as the Altar of the Confession, directly above the tomb of St. Peter himself—and in a brazen display of indecency, removed his trousers and underwear. Eyewitnesses, frozen in horror, later described how he appeared poised to urinate upon the altar, an act that would have desecrated not just marble and cloth, but the living memory of the Prince of the Apostles and the unyielding foundation of the Church.

The incident, captured in grainy smartphone videos that spread like wildfire across social media, lasted mere moments but left an indelible scar. Two security personnel eventually intervened, escorting the perpetrator away with a gentleness that struck many as woefully inadequate for the gravity of the offense. As the man was led off, the basilica—echoing with gasps and muffled sobs—fell into a stunned silence, broken only by the distant hum of tourists oblivious to the tragedy unfolding at the heart of the sanctuary.

This was no mere prank or fleeting lapse in judgment. It was a profanation, a deliberate affront to the sacred, occurring at a time when the Church calls the world to contemplate the boundless hope offered by Christ. In the shadow of Bernini's soaring baldacchino, that bronze canopy twisting heavenward like souls in ecstasy, the altar stands as a focal point of Eucharistic mystery and papal authority. To violate it is to strike at the soul of Catholicism itself. As news broke, pilgrims who had traveled lifetimes to kneel in its presence wept openly, their Jubilee pilgrimages forever marked by this shadow.

But why here? Why now? And what does this say about the state of our shared sacred spaces in an age of unraveling civility? This blog post delves into the details of the event, explores its historical echoes, examines the human and institutional failures that allowed it, and reflects on the deeper spiritual wounds it inflicts. In doing so, we seek not just to recount a scandal, but to reclaim the hope that the Jubilee promises—even from the depths of such desecration.

 

 A Profane Intrusion: The Desecration of St. Peter’s Basilica and What It Reveals About Sacred Spaces in a Secular Age

In the heart of Vatican City, where marble columns whisper echoes of saints and the air hums with centuries of prayer, an unthinkable act unfolded on Friday morning. As the first rays of autumn sun filtered through the grand nave of St. Peter’s Basilica, a man ascended the steps to the Altar of Confession, dropped his pants, and urinated on one of Christianity’s holiest sites—right in the midst of a 9:00 a.m. Holy Mass attended by hundreds of tourists and devout faithful. This wasn’t a quiet protest or a fleeting moment of madness; it was a brazen, visceral desecration captured on video by stunned onlookers, spreading like wildfire across social media before the echoes of the Mass had even faded.

The footage, shared widely on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), shows the perpetrator—a middle-aged man whose identity remains undisclosed—climbing the altar with deliberate steps. He pauses briefly, as if savoring the audacity, then unzips and unleashes a stream onto the sacred marble, the very spot where popes have knelt in supplication and where the remains of St. Peter, the fisherman-turned-apostle, are said to lie enshrined below. As plainclothes Vatican police officers rush forward, he fumbles to redress, briefly mooning the congregation before being wrestled away. The crowd’s reaction? A collective gasp of horror, frozen in that peculiar paralysis that grips witnesses to the profane amid the profound.

This incident, reported first by outlets like the New York Post and corroborated by Italian media such as Corriere della Sera, has ignited a firestorm of debate. Pope Leo XIV, the relatively new pontiff who ascended following the death of Pope Francis in April 2025, was said to be “shocked” upon learning of the event. The Holy See Press Office has remained uncharacteristically silent, offering no official statement as of Saturday evening. But in a world where sacred symbols are increasingly battlegrounds for personal grievances, political statements, and outright nihilism, this act demands more than outrage—it calls for reflection. What does it mean to defile a space so revered? And in an era of viral spectacles, how do we safeguard the soul of faith from the spectacle of the senseless?

To understand the gravity, one must first grasp the sanctity of the site. St. Peter’s Basilica isn’t just a church; it’s the epicenter of Catholic Christendom, a Renaissance masterpiece designed by the likes of Michelangelo, Bernini, and Bramante. Built over the tomb of St. Peter—the rock upon which Jesus promised to found his church—the basilica draws over 10 million pilgrims annually. Its dome pierces the Roman sky like a celestial beacon, and inside, every inch pulses with history: the Pietà’s sorrowful gaze, the baldacchino’s twisted bronze columns, and yes, the Altar of Confession.

This altar, a Baroque marvel unveiled in the 17th century, sits directly above St. Peter’s burial site. It’s where popes celebrate major liturgies, including the Easter Vigil and papal inaugurations. To urinate upon it isn’t mere vandalism; it’s an assault on the corporeal and spiritual legacy of the faith. The marble, polished by the knees of emperors and beggars alike, now bears the stain of human waste—a grotesque inversion of baptismal waters. Witnesses described the scene as “sickening,” with one tourist, an American pilgrim named Maria Rossi (speaking anonymously to La Repubblica), recounting, “We were midway through the Gloria when it happened. The priest faltered, the organ kept playing like nothing was wrong, but everything was. It felt like the devil himself had strolled in for coffee.”

The man’s motives remain murky. Vatican authorities have not released his name, age, or nationality, citing an ongoing investigation. Was this a targeted protest against the Church’s stances on social issues, much like the nude activist who scaled the altar in June 2023 to decry the Ukraine war? That Polish man, his back scrawled with “Save the Children of Ukraine,” leapt naked onto the same spot, prompting a hurried penitential rite to reconsecrate the area. Or does it echo the February 2025 incident, when another intruder toppled six ornate candelabras from the altar in what authorities called a “drunken lark”? No manifesto was issued here—no chants, no banners. Just the raw, animalistic act, followed by a sheepish redress under duress. Social media sleuths have speculated wildly: Was he a disgruntled ex-Catholic? A performance artist gone rogue? A symptom of rising mental health crises in a post-pandemic world? Without official word, the void fills with conjecture, turning tragedy into tabloid fodder.

Eyewitness accounts paint a picture of chaos contained. Father Giovanni Bianchi, the presiding priest, later told Avvenire that he “instinctively raised the host higher, as if shielding the Eucharist from the filth.” The Mass continued, albeit truncated—communion distributed in hushed tones, the final blessing uttered with trembling voices. Security, bolstered since the 1981 assassination attempt on John Paul II, sprang into action swiftly; the man was off the premises within minutes, though it’s unclear if charges were filed under Italy’s laws on religious desecration, which carry penalties up to two years in prison. Vatican gendarmes, trained in crowd control and de-escalation, have faced increasing challenges: Post-2020, visitor numbers surged, but so did incidents of “protest tourism,” where sacred sites become stages for personal vendettas.

As the story ricocheted across global headlines—from The Guardian’s somber analysis to Fox News’ indignant rants—the broader implications crystallized. This isn’t an isolated outrage; it’s the latest in a string of assaults on religious symbols that signal a deepening cultural rift. Consider the 2018 Hamburg church arson by a far-right extremist, or the 2022 desecration of Jewish graves in France amid rising antisemitism. In the U.S., statues of saints have been toppled in the name of racial justice, blurring lines between iconoclasm and vandalism. St. Peter’s, with its aura of untouchability, makes this hit harder—a reminder that no fortress of faith is impervious to the human impulse toward destruction.

Yet, amid the revulsion, there’s a thread of resilience. The Church has rituals for such violations: a rite of exorcism for desecrated altars, involving holy water, incense, and prayers of reparation. By Saturday afternoon, Vatican workers were discreetly at work, steam-cleaning the marble and murmuring Latin invocations. “The stain washes away, but the spirit endures,” tweeted Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State, in a rare personal post that garnered over 50,000 likes. Pilgrims, undeterred, queued outside the basilica’s doors on Saturday, rosaries in hand, turning grief into communal solidarity.

To delve deeper, let’s contextualize this within the papacy of Leo XIV. Elected in May 2025 after a conclave marked by geopolitical tensions—the Russia-Ukraine war raging, climate crises escalating—Leo XIV, born Eduardo Matteo Rivera in Buenos Aires, has positioned himself as a bridge-builder. A Jesuit like Francis, he’s emphasized synodality, dialogue with the secular world, and outreach to the marginalized. His first encyclical, Fratelli Tutti Revisited, called for “a new covenant between faith and reason in an age of doubt.” But doubt cuts both ways: Progressive Catholics hail his openness on LGBTQ+ issues and environmentalism, while traditionalists decry perceived dilutions of doctrine. Could this desecration be a backlash from the fringes? A symbolic “piss” on reforms that challenge orthodoxy?

Speculation aside, the incident underscores a paradox of modernity: As physical churches empty, their symbolic power amplifies. Social media accelerates this— the video of the urination has amassed 2 million views on X alone, spawning memes, think pieces, and conspiracy theories. One viral thread by user @FaithfulInRome posited it as “Satan’s TikTok moment,” while @SecularSage quipped, “When your protest outgrows the bathroom line.” Humor, as ever, is the era’s coping mechanism, but it masks unease. In a 2024 Pew survey, 40% of young Europeans identified as religiously unaffiliated, yet 70% still viewed sacred sites as cultural patrimony. Desecrations like this don’t just offend believers; they unsettle a collective heritage, forcing us to confront why these spaces still matter.

History offers sobering parallels. During the French Revolution, revolutionaries converted Notre-Dame into a “Temple of Reason,” guillotining clergy and auctioning relics. The 1966 Cultural Revolution in China saw Red Guards smash Buddhist statues in Lhasa, erasing millennia of devotion. Closer to home, the 16th-century Protestant iconoclasm gutted English cathedrals, whitewashing frescoes in zeal for purity. Each era’s vandals claimed moral high ground—liberté, equality, progress—but the aftermath was always the same: fractured communities, lost irreplaceables, and a lingering scar on the soul. St. Peter’s has weathered sieges, schisms, and scandals (the 1983 embezzlement trial comes to mind), emerging scarred but steadfast. Will this be another chapter in its chronicle of survival?

From a psychological lens, such acts scream of deeper malaise. Dr. Elena Vasquez, a Rome-based forensic psychologist, notes in a Psychology Today op-ed that “public desecration often stems from unresolved trauma or a bid for notoriety in an attention economy.” The perpetrator’s exposure—pants down, vulnerability raw—mirrors the Church’s own “exposure” in recent years: the sex abuse scandals that rocked the faithful, the financial opacity allegations under Francis. Is this man a mirror, reflecting back the institution’s humiliations? Or merely a chaotic vector for personal demons? Without his voice, we project ours, turning one man’s folly into a Rorschach test for society’s ills.

Legally, the Vatican treads a tightrope. As a sovereign entity, it handles internal security via the Swiss Guard and Gendarmerie, but cross-border pursuits fall to Italian jurisdiction. Past cases, like the 2023 nude protester, ended in swift deportation rather than prosecution, prioritizing de-escalation over spectacle. Experts predict a similar outcome here: quiet expulsion, perhaps psychiatric evaluation, and enhanced barriers around the altar. Yet, calls for tougher measures grow. Italian MP Alessandra Rossi, of the Brothers of Italy party, tweeted Saturday, “Enough with the leniency—these are attacks on our Christian roots. Time for zero tolerance.” Her words tap into Europe’s rising populism, where cultural preservation becomes a proxy for identity politics.

As the weekend wears on, pilgrims trickle back into St. Peter’s, the air thick with frankincense and murmured Hail Marys. A makeshift memorial of flowers and candles has sprouted near the obelisk in St. Peter’s Square—red roses for the blood of martyrs, white lilies for purity reclaimed. Tour guides, ever adaptable, weave the incident into their narratives: “See that altar? It’s seen emperors fall and faiths rise. A little urine? Just another wave in the tide.” Laughter ripples through the group, a defiant reclaiming of narrative.

But levity aside, this desecration poses profound questions for the faithful and faithless alike. In an age of algorithms and atomization, what role do physical sacred spaces play? They’re not just stone and gold; they’re anchors in a sea of ephemera, loci where the transcendent touches the temporal. To defile one is to challenge that tether, daring us to ask: If holiness can be so casually soiled, what’s left unsullied? For Catholics, the answer lies in sacramentality—the belief that grace permeates the profane, turning water to wine, bread to body. A mopped altar is no less holy for its momentary indignity.

Pope Leo XIV, in a Sunday Angelus address (if tradition holds), may well address this head-on. Imagine him, mitre gleaming under the basilica’s light, intoning: “In the face of filth, we choose forgiveness; in desecration, rededication.” Such words could galvanize, transforming violation into vocation. Historically, crises have catalyzed renewal—the Black Death birthed the Renaissance, Vatican II reshaped liturgy post-Holocaust. Perhaps this urinary uprising sparks a “synod on security,” blending tech (AI-monitored crowds?) with theology (more lay guardians?).

Beyond the Vatican’s walls, the ripple effects extend. Interfaith dialogues may intensify; Jewish and Muslim leaders have already voiced solidarity, recalling shared histories of holy site strife. Secular ethicists ponder: In a pluralistic world, how do we protect the sacred without privileging one faith? UNESCO, overseeing St. Peter’s as a World Heritage site, might advocate for global protocols, treating basilicas like endangered species.

As I pen this, the video loops on my screen—the man’s silhouette against eternal stone, a fleeting shadow on eternity. It’s grotesque, yes, but also achingly human: flawed, impulsive, seeking significance in the basest way. The Church, with its 1.3 billion adherents, has absorbed worse. From Nero’s persecutions to Borgia corruptions, it persists, a phoenix of piety. This incident, for all its vulgarity, reaffirms that resilience. It reminds us that sacredness isn’t fragile porcelain but living clay—malleable, markable, but ultimately unbreakable.

In the end, the true desecration would be indifference. Let this be a call to cherish our shared sanctuaries, to guard them not with guns alone but with hearts attuned to the holy. As the faithful file past the Altar of Confession this week, they’ll pause longer, pray deeper, knowing that even in degradation, divinity endures. And perhaps, in that pause, a fractured world finds its way back to wonder.

This was not the first time St. Peter's high altar has borne the weight of human folly. The basilica, for all its grandeur, has a shadowed history of violations that read like a litany of modern woes. Just two years prior, in June 2023, another man—a Ukrainian refugee—stripped naked atop the same platform, his back inscribed with the plea "Save the children of Ukraine." That incident, too, went viral, drawing millions of views and sparking debates on security versus symbolism. The perpetrator, driven by war's trauma, was subdued after several minutes, his cries echoing off Michelangelo's dome.

Rewind further to 2019, when a knife-wielding assailant terrorized visitors near the Pietà, forcing an evacuation and prompting a rare lockdown. And in February 2025, mere months into the Jubilee preparations, a Romanian man scaled the altar to hurl 19th-century candelabras—each valued at €30,000—to the floor, their crash a thunderclap of destruction. These are not isolated anomalies but threads in a tapestry of vulnerability, woven from the basilica's dual role as fortress and open invitation.

What unites these episodes? A tension between accessibility and protection. St. Peter's is no museum under glass; it is a living church, pulsing with the breath of believers. Barriers are minimal—ropes and signs imploring respect—because faith thrives on encounter, not exclusion. Yet, in an era of global migration, mental health crises, and performative outrage, this openness invites peril. Historians draw parallels to medieval desecrations, when iconoclasts smashed statues during Reformation fervor, or even ancient Roman persecutions where Christians faced the arena's lions. Today's threats are subtler, born not of doctrinal war but of societal unraveling: the homeless man lost in psychosis, the activist cloaked in desperation.

The October 10 incident, with its visceral indecency, stands apart in its intimacy. Urination as desecration evokes Old Testament imagery—the prophets decrying Israel's idolatry as spiritual whoredom, or the Maccabean revolt against pagan altars fouled by swine's blood. In Christian terms, it profanes the Eucharist's purity, where the altar becomes Christ's body. Theologians hastened to frame it thus: a mirror to our collective sin, demanding reparation through prayer and fasting. But beyond symbolism, it underscores a practical crisis: how does a Church embracing 32 million pilgrims safeguard its holiest ground without erecting walls that echo Jericho's fall?

 Security Lapses: A Failure of Stewardship?

The gentle escort of the offender ignited immediate outrage. Videos show no rush of guards, no swift takedown; instead, a measured approach that allowed the exposure to linger. Critics, from Catholic commentators to secular pundits, decried it as "theatrical negligence," a performance more suited to a film set than a sacred space. Cardinal Gambetti, overseeing basilica operations, faced pointed questions: Why no panic buttons at the altar? Why rely on understaffed patrols amid Jubilee crowds? Reports suggest security was stretched thin that day, with personnel diverted to Holy Door queues, leaving the confessio area monitored by a single camera and roving observer.

Vatican responses were defensive, citing the man's evident distress as justification for de-escalation. "Force begets force," one official analogized, invoking Gospel nonviolence. Yet, this philosophy clashes with precedent: the 2025 candelabra vandal was wrestled down within seconds, his mental state no barrier to restraint. Pilgrims voiced frustration online, with hashtags like ProtectTheAltar trending alongside calls for AI surveillance or armed plainclothes teams. One viral post quipped, "If they can detect a water bottle at entry, why not detect intent at the altar?"

Broader critiques target the Vatican's siloed approach. The Gendarmerie, a 130-member force trained in diplomacy over combat, coordinates poorly with Italian police, jurisdictional lines blurring at the basilica's edge. Jubilee strains exacerbate this: with 1.3 million already through the Holy Door by October, resources dwindle. Experts advocate hybrid models—drones for aerial oversight, behavioral algorithms flagging erratic movement—but tradition resists, lest technology profane the profane. Still, the incident's optics are damning: a Church proclaiming hope, yet unable to shield its heart from harm.

 Theological Ripples: Desecration and the Call to Reparation

Beyond logistics lies the soul-wound. In Catholic theology, the altar embodies Christ's sacrifice, its surface a foretaste of heaven's banquet. To befoul it is to echo Judas's betrayal, a kiss of filth upon the divine. Pope Leo XIV, in his Jubilee catecheses, has emphasized hope as "meekness conquering wounds," but this event tests that meekness sorely. Liturgists rushed to perform ablutions—ritual cleansings with holy water and incense—yet the stain lingers in memory, a communal stigmata.

The faithful responded with fervor. Vigils sprang up in side chapels, rosaries chanted in reparation; online, PrayForStPeters amassed thousands of posts, blending lament with resolve. One Brazilian devotee, sharing a video of the act, urged: "Let us repair with our love what hate has torn." This outpouring reveals resilience: desecration, while scarring, galvanizes. It recalls the early Church, persecuted yet proliferating, turning arenas into altars of witness.

Yet, questions persist. Does such vulnerability signal divine invitation—to embrace the broken—or institutional frailty? Theologians like those at the Pontifical Gregorian University argue the former, positing the incident as a parable: just as Christ healed the possessed in synagogues, so must the Church tend the afflicted even in desecration. Critics counter that unchecked access risks eroding trust, pilgrims shunning the basilica for safer devotions. The Jubilee of Hope, proclaimed to heal divisions, now grapples with its own fracture—hope not as naivety, but as fortified faith.

 Broader Implications: Sacred Spaces in a Secular Age

Zoom out, and October 10 mirrors wider currents. Globally, holy sites face siege: Notre-Dame's blaze, Jerusalem's contested walls, synagogues scarred by hate. St. Peter's, as Catholicism's apex, amplifies these threats, its violation a proxy for assaults on tradition. In Italy, rising secularism—evident in declining Mass attendance—breeds indifference to sacrilege; what once provoked riots now trends as spectacle.

The incident also spotlights mental health's intersection with faith. The perpetrator's plight underscores the Church's social doctrine: care for the vulnerable as Christ's mandate. Yet, resources lag; Vatican charities strain under Jubilee demands, leaving streets teeming with the unseen. Pilgrims, confronted with raw suffering, depart changed—not just by grace, but by guilt. "We crossed the Holy Door," one tweeted, "but left our brother outside."

Politically, it stirs debates on migration and borders. Though Italian-born, the man's vagrancy evokes refugee crises, fueling populist calls for tighter Vatican gates. Pope Leo XIV, a bridge-builder, may address this in upcoming audiences, weaving compassion with caution.

 A Path to Healing: Restoring the Sacred

As October 11 dawned, St. Peter's reopened with enhanced patrols, the altar gleaming anew after overnight rites. Pilgrims trickled back, tentative yet tenacious, their steps a quiet defiance. Healing begins here: in forgiveness for the fallen man, accountability for guardians, and recommitment to the altar's call. The Jubilee endures, its hope undimmed, for even from desecration springs resurrection.

In the end, this profanation—raw, inexplicable—reminds us: sacredness is not inviolable stone, but living covenant. We guard it not with barriers alone, but with hearts vigilant in love. May the Prince of Peace, entombed beneath, intercede; may the Church rise, as ever, from ashes to alleluias.

 Sources

Man urinates on altar at Vatican City's St. Peter's Basilica during Holy Mass

Man urinates on altar at Vatican City's St. Peter's Basilica during Holy Mass

Man desecrates altar of St. Peter's Basilica, detained by security | Catholic News Agency

San Pietro, atto osceno in basilica: sale sull'altare della Confessione e urina davanti a fedeli e turisti | Corriere.it

Choc a San Pietro: elude la sicurezza e orina sull'altare. "Sconcerto" del Papa – Il Tempo

1. X Post by @silerenonpossum [post:18]: Original video and description of the incident occurring on October 10, 2025.

2. X Post by @NovusOrdoWatch [post:17]: Breaking report confirming the man's actions and escort by security.

3. X Post by @sitsio [post:20]: Commentary on the gentle handling and call for stronger response.

4. X Post by @cruxstationalis [post:21]: Video share and call for prayers in reparation.

5. Catholic News Agency (CNA), "Man Attacks High Altar of St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican" : Historical context on prior altar desecrations.

6. CNN, "The Vatican: Man ransacks altar at St. Peter’s Basilica" : Details on security response in similar incidents.

7. ZENIT, "Vatican security concerns resurface: person desecrates altar" : Patterns of previous violations, including 2023 naked climb.

8. Aleteia, "Man vandalizes main altar of St. Peter's Basilica" : Vatican statement on mental illness in 2025 candelabra incident.

9. Vatican News, General Audience October 1, 2025 : Pope Leo XIV's catechesis on hope and resurrection, contextualizing Jubilee themes.

10. National Catholic Register : Eyewitness accounts and damage assessments from past events.

Recent Attacks on Catholic Churches: A Troubling Trend

Recent Attacks on Catholic Churches: A Troubling Trend

In recent months, there has been a disturbing increase in attacks on Catholic churches across the United States and even at the Vatican. These incidents have raised concerns about the safety and security of religious institutions and the motivations behind such hostility.

Attacks in the United States

According to a report by the Family Research Council (FRC), there were **436 acts of hostility against churches in 2023**, more than double the number reported in 2022. These incidents included vandalism, arson, bomb threats, and gun-related incidents. The report highlighted that attacks on churches have been occurring in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Some notable incidents include:

- Vandalism at St. Nicholas of Tolentine Parish in Queens, New York: The Christmas crèche was attacked twice in one night.

- St. Columba Church in Brooklyn, New York: A stained-glass window and a cross were damaged.

- Fowler United Methodist Church in Annapolis, Maryland: Vandals caused over $100,000 in damages, ripping pages from Bibles and hymnals, and removing a Christian flag.

- At Holy Rosary Catholic Church in New Jersey, someone put human feces in the baptismal font. 

The FRC report suggests that these attacks are part of a broader trend of growing hostility towards Christianity and core Christian beliefs. The report's author, Arielle Del Turco, noted that such acts of hostility can send a message that churches are not respected or welcomed in their communities.

Attacks at the Vatican

Even the Vatican has not been immune to these attacks. On February 7, 2025, a man of Romanian origin desecrated the main altar of St. Peter's Basilica by climbing on top of it and throwing six candelabras to the ground. He then began to remove the altar cloth before being detained by Vatican security. The man was later identified as having a serious mental disability and was placed at the disposal of Italian authorities.

This incident follows a similar event in June 2023, when another man climbed the high altar and undressed before being arrested. These repeated breaches of security at such a high-profile religious site have raised questions about the effectiveness of existing protective measures and the potential risks posed by individuals seeking attention or acting out due to mental distress.

Conclusion

The recent attacks on Catholic churches, both in the United States and at the Vatican, are deeply troubling. They highlight the need for increased security measures and a greater understanding of the motivations behind such hostility. It is essential for communities to come together to support and protect their places of worship, ensuring that they remain safe and welcoming for all.

---

Virginia Catholic bishop says altar desecration is 'increasing global trend' | Fox News

Priest attacked at downtown Spokane Catholic church

Priest attacked during service in Washington Catholic church, says Holy Spirit helped him respond

Man attacks high altar of St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican | Catholic News Agency

 

Taylor Marshall Behind Amazon 'Pachamama' Carvings Vandalism

During a You Tube broadcast, conspiracist Taylor Marshall had on Alexander Tschugguel. Tschugguel had contracted the coronavirus and is recoverying (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2020/03/alexander-tschugguel-contracts-covid-19.html). As many of you know, Tschugguel was the man who vandalized the carvings used during the Amazon Synod in Rome. He threw them into the Tiber (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2019/11/pachamama-good-thief-alexander.html). Many voiced their disgust at the action, though others, mainly so-called conservative Catholics, praised it. Tschugguel became a hero to them; the "new St. Boniface." Well, some in the Catholic blogosphere have long suspected that Taylor Marshall may have been behind the stunt in order to garner publicity and sell more books regarding his conspiracy theories. Well, it turns out that the suspicions were correct.

During the webcast, Marshall revealed that he supported and funded the effort. At 106:40, Marshall begins to explain his role in the vandalism of the carvings:




Taylor states:

 “Alexander and I had met in Rome … even before the Pachas were out, and when we learned about the tree that was planted in that ceremony with the Pachas, we were at dinner and we were discussing how we might go and rip that tree out of the ground, That kind of scared us a little,” Marshall chuckled, “but we really didn’t know about the Pachas (yet) … They were still saying that they were Mary and Elizabeth, which none of us really bought, but at least it wasn’t outright idolatry. “So you worked out your plan with your friend, and I wired you some money for airfare, and you guys flew from Vienna over to Rome, and you got it done, a wonderful thing. This has never been told before. I just waited until you texted me and said, ‘Our airplane is off the ground in Rome. We’re free. We’re out of Rome.’ And at that point I uploaded the footage to YouTube. None of us wanted you to get detained or stuck in Rome.”

Tschugguel apparently knows some people who reside near the Vatican gardens and planned with them to enter the church and steal the carvings. However, he voiced concern about possible snipers on the roof of the Domus Sanctae Marthae where Pope Francis lives.  Marshall continues to rant about the Coronavirus being a punishment from God due to the "Pachamama" at the Vatican.  There is no word from the Vatican or Italian police regarding the claims.  They made it clear that they will be investigating and possibly charging those responsible.  Both Marshall and Tschugguel have admitted to the crime and can face possible charges.

In my opinion, charges should be filed. People cannot enter churches and steal things in order to make a statement by vandalizing them. Regardless of the reason, this is wrong and illegal. It is a disruption in civil society.  Rational people use words to fight and do not get physical. The Vatican and even the pope have made it clear several times that the carvings were not "Pachamama" or anything related to the myth (see:  http://www.sacerdotus.com/2019/10/pagan-pope-pagan-vatican-ceremony.html and http://www.sacerdotus.com/2019/10/pope-francis-says-amazon-figures-are-of.html).  The pope did describe them as "Pachamama," but simply because this was how the Italian media was describing them. He did not mean that they were literally "Pachamama."

Moreover, the claim that Coronavirus is a punishment from God due to the display at the Vatican with the carvings is silly. As stated, the carvings are not Pagan nor "Pachamama." They were simply symbols just like many churches use an eagle to represent freedom or a pelican to represent God. These carvings were never worshiped nor was there any direction to use them to replace Christian themes.  Furthermore, let us give Marshall the benefit of doubt.  Suppose this virus is a punishment due to the display of the carvings at the Vatican, then why did Alexander contract the virus? If Alexander is a "hero" by vandalizing the "pagan idols," why did he become part of the punishment?  Moses did not suffer the plagues. Noah did not drown with the others. So why did Alexander get caught up in this alleged punishment from God due to the display of the cravings at the Vatican?  We can see how Marshall simply does not make any sense. The more we see him broadcast and tweet, the more it becomes clear that he is suffering from something deeply spiritual, and perhaps, psychological.

It is also selfish for Marshall to put this young man in harm's way. If there are snipers on a roof, he could have been shot dead!  Moreover, he could have gotten arrested. We hear Marshall in the video state his concern that Alexander leave Rome for Austria immediately.  He know the legal ramifications of the stunt, yet he wired money to this young man to commit this crime.  Hopefully Vatican and Italian police will issue charges.  This is unacceptable behavior.  Marshall is a coward.  Why did he not do it himself?  He is a wealthy person who has the means to hire lawyers in case he got caught.  Why pay off a young man to do his dirty work?  Marshall prides himself in masculinity, but what he did was very cowardly. It is no wonder that Marshall disappeared from Twitter during this period (see: https://www.sacerdotus.com/2019/10/twitter-suspendsbans-conspiracist.html).   

What are your thoughts?  Post below on Disqus. Be sure to follow the rules for commenting.  





Source:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/maryland-ordered-into-lockdown-major-announcement-for-virginia-coming-at-2-pm-live-updates

Atheist Vandalizes NJ Catholic Parish

 In a world where atheists are getting more empowered via anonymous online accounts, we are starting to see them become more active in public.

Just last week, an atheist attacked a Baptist community in Texas killing 27, many of them children.  Days before, an atheist vandalized a Catholic Church in Monmouth Beach, New Jersey.  The parish of the Precious Blood has been targeted by an atheist for the past several months.

 In a recent attack, a window was broken, a statue damaged, fecal matter left on the stairway and a marker was used to write "God is FAKE" on the exterior steps of the parish building.

Parishioners are concerned that this is going on. Their worries are even more validated after the attack on the Baptist community by atheist Devin Kelley. All Catholics must be on the lookout in their respective parishes for these demented souls looking to publicly display their diatribe against God and religion in any form.

If you live in Monmouth Beach, NJ and know anything, please contact detective Peter Rechtman at 732-229-1313 or at prechtman@monmouthbeach.org.

We must get this lunatic off of the street and in jail, so he or she can get the help he or she needs.








Source:

https://patch.com/new-jersey/redbank/god-fake-vandal-writes-monmouth-beach-church-police

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2017/11/07/community-on-edge-after-beloved-monmouth-county-catholic-church-vandalized/