Pages

Sunday, January 31, 2016

4th Sunday of Ordinary Time: Will We Reject Jesus?

In the first reading, we read of Jeremiah recalling what God told him. God knew him before he was born. This verse is popular in the pro-life movement. God knows us before we were even conceived. This means that He has planned us (Psalm 139:13). He from all eternity thought of you and me and allowed us to be (John 1:3). Life is sacred. From conception to natural death, all life is sacred an d must be protected.  This first readings should remind us that God has a plan for each of us (Isaiah 49:1,5, Jeremiah 29:11).

Our existence is not a mistake or simply a consequence of reproductive acts between a male and a female.  There is something much more deeper than meiosis and mitosis taking place as the fertilized egg develops. Like with Jeremiah, God tells us to "gird" the loins or 'man up/woman-up.' We must do what He asks of us and not let let this world crush us.  The world will hate us because of God, but we must not give up (John 15:18). Proudly we must sing of God's salvation as today's Psalm tells us.

It is in the Lord where we take refuge.  He will deliver us and never let us be put to shame though some will mock us (Psalm 50:15, Psalm 50:15). The Lord is indeed our rock and stronghold (Psalm 78:35). He will rescue us from the wicked. Our lives belong to God. We depend on Him for our existence.  Our lives must proclaim the salvation and joy of the Lord.  We do this by using the gifts God gives us as the second reading tells us.

God gives us gifts.  Not everyone gets the same gifts (1 Peter 4:10).  However, even if we have these gifts or all of them but have no love, then the gifts mean nothing.  St. Paul tells us,

"If I speak in human and angelic tongues,but do not have love, I am a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal. And if I have the gift of prophecy, and comprehend all mysteries and all knowledge; if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing."  

How true are these words! If I can speak all the languages on Earth, know all the theology, science etc in the world, know all the Bible, Catechism, Church's teachings by heart etc, but do not have love, then all that knowledge, all that ability means zero, nada, zilch.  It is love that gives substance to these gifts because God is love (1 John 4:8).  In this year of Mercy, this second reading should speak to us much more. Many times we see clergy, religious and lay with all kinds of gifts who have foul personalities. They may be judgmental, rude, arrogant and nasty; this is not Christianity.  This is not what God wants. If love is not present; if mercy is not present, then they are wasting their time. These people are like clashing cymbals that make noise but have no substance.

Finally in the Gospel, we continue from last week's Gospel. Jesus reveals that Isaiah was referring to Himself. The Jews present took issue with this and asked, "Isn't this the son of Joseph?"  Jesus then reminds them that God sent Elijah and others to those who were poor and the pariahs of the time (1 Kings 17:7-16). He also reminds them that a prophet is not welcomed in his own land. Sometimes we try hard to work in a parish and get no support. This has happened to me many times.  Even online, there are some Catholics who do not support me and try to stifle my evangelization. They see it as a 'competition' of sorts. We as prophets will not always be welcomed even among our own.  However, we must not let this crush us as we read in the first reading. We must march on forward preaching the Gospel of love and mercy; reminding the world that God is Father before He is judge (Matthew 9:13).  Not everyone will take a liking to this.

Like Jesus, you will be attacked and possibly driven away.  The people wanted to hurl Jesus down a hill. The message of Christ and mercy is not easy to take for some. Today we have some who attack Pope Francis seeing him with suspicion as he was reminds us what the washing of the feet rite on Holy Thursday is all about. It is not a moment to take in nostalgia of the past or to remind ourselves that priests are men (Mark 7:13, Colossians 2:8).  The washing of the feet is a sign of service, love, mercy and inclusion. Jesus washed the feet of those who walked the world, got dirty but decided to come to Jesus for forgiveness.

Will we reject Jesus and try to toss Jesus over the cliff who is found in the poor, in men, women, children; the elderly, the gay, the Muslim, Jew etc?  Let us not reject Jesus and serve Him in others. Let us spread the Gospel with love, not fanaticism or legalism. Let us sing the song of salvation and remind the world that Jesus came for everyone and calls everyone back home in His heart.  May Jesus Christ be praised.






Source:

http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings/013116.cfm



Friday, January 29, 2016

Reporters Who Exposed Planned Parenthood's Fetal Parts Business Indicted



I am sure you have heard the saying, "payback is a b....."  Well, this seems to be the case now with David Daleiden and his fellow reporter who were both indicted on felony charges and are facing up to 20 years in prison. Their crime?  Secretly recording Planned Parenthood employees speaking about selling fetal tissue, creating false ID, fake company and buying fetal tissue.  The Pro-Life community is up at arms over this.  Moreover, the prosecutor involved is on the board of Planned Parenthood. Requests for her and her office to recuse themselves from the case went on deaf ears.  It seems clear that the charges are in retaliation to the attention given to Planned Parenthood over the videos and the Congressional hearings that followed.

Lawyer for Daleiden describes the charges without substance.  They are most likely an attempt to intimidate David and the Pro-Life movement.  It is scary to think that investigative reporting may become illegal if these charges go through. The charges are an attack against journalism.  In many instances, this sort of investigative journalism was used to discover scams and other problems in government and private companies.  Moreover, what is troubling is that Planned Parenthood got scott free from their illegal sale of fetal tissue. Their supporters claim that the organization did nothing wrong, but this prosecutor claims David bought fetal tissue, which is illegal.  The question is: If Planned Parenthood sold no tissue, then how did David buy it from them?

We need to pay close attention to this case as it affects us in many ways, not just in the pro-life movement.  Throughout the nation, minorities have complained that prosecutors have let cops free after hard evidence has been presented that they did not follow proper procedure and a life was taken. If prosecutors can easily set up a case in favor of their bias, then justice cannot exist.

Here are some tweets on the issue:


















Source:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/26/texas-prosecutor-planned-parenthood-link-fuels-bia/

https://t.co/qQUMTrWKB0

http://citizengo.org/en/lf/32614-support-david-daleiden-and-sandra-merritt-demand-harris-county-grand-jury-drop-their

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/matthew-balan/2016/01/26/networks-continue-spotlighting-indictment-pro-life-video-producers?platform=hootsuite

http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/01/filmmakers-indicted-for-planned-parenthood-video.html?mid=twitter_nymag

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/grand-jury-indicts-leaders-behind-undercover-planned-parenthood-videos-86203/?platform=hootsuite

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/planned-parenthood-abortion-indictment-218202

https://www.lifesitenews.com/petitions/i-stand-with-david-daleiden

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/undercover-video-producers-say-planned-parenthood-is-guilty-they-are-innoce

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/01/25/grand-jury-ignores-planned-parenthood-selling-aborted-babies-indicts-man-behind-videos-instead/#.VqbMqoBz4fg.twitter

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/01/26/activists-behind-planned-parenthood-videos-accused-using-fake-licenses.html

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/01/28/d-a-who-indicted-david-daleiden-received-over-25000-from-attorney-for-late-term-abortionist/

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/undercover-methods-ensnared-planned-parenthood-investigators-with-criminal/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-david-daleidens-lawyer-tells-lifesitenews-the-charges-are-baseles

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Fox News - 7th #GopDebate



The 7th GOP debate just took place with someone missing, Donald Trump.  Trump voiced his concerns that Megyn Kelly was a moderator and refused to participate in the debate unless FOX News removed her. They did not, so he did his own event to raise money for veterans. It seems that this action hurt the debate as only 12 million viewed it as opposed to 25 million when Trump was on the debate in August of 2015.

The undercard debate had a new addition, Jim Gilmore. He along with Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee and Carly Fiorina debated. Each repeated their positions on a variety of topics and did not make any new impacts on popularity.  In the main event, Rubio did pretty well along with Rand Paul.  Ted Cruz was attacked by several politicians on his 'amnesty descrepancies.' A video was even played by the moderators showing Cruz's contradictions. Ironically, though not present, Trump was soaring in popularity on social media. He 'won' the debate in that sense.






Source:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/moments-mattered-7th-undercard-republican-debate/story?id=36573955

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/best-lines-seventh-republican-debate/story?id=36574992

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-idUSKCN0V619Q

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/28/winners-and-losers-from-the-7th-republican-presidential-de

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/30/us/politics/ted-cruz-republican-debate.html?_r=0bate/

http://money.cnn.com/2016/01/29/media/republican-debate-ratings-donald-trump/

'Atheism Is Stupid' Book Discount Coupon Code



St. Thomas Aquinas wrote his famous Quinque Viae offering arguments for the existence of God. While many of the points he made are dated and have been addressed by the philosophers and scientists of today, they are still great arguments to build new ones from which reflect today's knowledge.

My book, 'Atheism Is Stupid' uses science, philosophy, theology, history and other academic sources in order to refute many of the commonly used arguments in favor of atheism.  This book will empower theists and will bring atheists to question atheism.  Make no mistake, this book is not an 'apologetics' book using the Bible to defend the Bible.  This book is an academic work based on a popular blog series and my own life experience with atheism as an atheist.

It even has some atheists in panic mode. They have rushed to post fake reviews on Amazon in order to discourage avid readers from purchasing the book and have even falsely reported genuine reviews.

In honor of Aquinas, I will be offering a discount.  
You can order the book at:

https://www.createspace.com/5710607

enter the code S9QSL9XP to take $5.00 off the list price. 


The discount code will work until 11:59 PM EST on the Presentation of the Lord February 2, 2016.  So you have six days to get the book at the discounted price!  







Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Abe Vigoda Dead At 94











Abe Vigoda, known for his 'sad face' and role of 'The Godfather' as 'Salvatore Tessio' as well as 'Detective Phil Fish' on the sitcom 'Barney Miller' has passed away at the age of 94. He died in his sleep in Woodland Park, New Jersey at the home of his daughter Carol Vigoda Fuchs. He was of Russian-Jewish descent.

Vigoda was a broad way actor who rose to fame. His role on 'The Godfather' was a boost. He played the role of 'Tessio' who was a childhood friend of 'Vito Corleone.' The character would later be 'sent to swim with the fishes' after it is learned that he betrayed the 'Corleone' family in favor of the 'Barzini' family after 'Vito Corleone' chose his son 'Michael' played by Al Pacino to head the 'family business' instead of 'Tessio.' After the movie, he starred in the comedy 'Barney Miller' until 1982 when he left the show. Shortly afterwards, 'People Magazine' made a mistake when it reported that he had died.

On his website, http://www.abevigoda.com/, Vigoda kept running with the mistake announcing his death in 1982 with a meme with two X's on his eyes.  May he rest in peace.




Source:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/27/arts/television/abe-vigoda-actor-of-godfather-fame-dies-at-94.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/abe-vigoda-dead-death-fish-barney-miller-201029318.html

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Priest Slapping Children


There is a video being posted on Facebook and other social media which shows what looks like a Catholic priest in green ordinary time vestments slapping kids upside the head, pulling their hair and even kicking them.  The video is extremely disturbing and even has the 'Friendly Atheist' scratching his head.

Before Vatican II, the rite of Confirmation was administered with a slight tap on the face of the confirmandi. However, this was abolished.  What this priest is doing in this video is disgusting.  This is not a rite of the Catholic Church!  It is child abuse.  If anyone recognizes this priest (if he really is a Catholic priest), please contact the police and the local bishop.  This man needs to be arrested for child abuse and endangering the welfare of a child.  He is clearly mentally ill.












Source:

https://www.facebook.com/305421646274244/videos/551903328292740/

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/01/20/heres-a-video-of-a-catholic-priest-smacking-kids-upside-their-heads/

Monday, January 25, 2016

Blizzard 2016 Jonas




A monster blizzard named 'Jonas' by weather authorities hit the north east on Saturday bringing in record snow fall in many areas. New York City had about 27 inches recorded. The storm shut down the city and brought worry to many in New Jersey who live near the shore.

After the storm, many residents of New York and New Jersey complained of the poor response by the city.  Manhattan, particularly the wealthy areas, was plowed instantly.  However, other boroughs, especially in areas where the poor live did not see one plow until today. Moreover, DiBlasio decided to keep schools open despite little MTA service and un-plowed streets making it impossible to drive and even park.

Residents took to the media and social media to voice their complaints by posting photos and video. The poor performance by the administration of New York City comes at a time where the City Council voted to increase their salary and that of the mayor by 40% which is an injustice in my opinion. They do not deserve an increase period.

Neil Degrasse Tyson vs 'bOb' - Flat Earth Rap Battle




Here is an interesting post.  Puerto Rican and African American astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson is having a 'rap' battle of sorts.  A rapper named 'Bob' tweeted some strange tweets claiming that the Earth is Flat. He posted theories and 'evidence' that comes from conspiracy theorists and seems convinced it is factual.  Well, Dr. Tyson took to task and corrected his ideas prompting 'Bob' to make a 'diss' rap against the astrophysicist.  In a twist, Dr. Tyson had his nephew respond with a 'diss' rap of his own defending his uncle.  The entire exchange is unbelievable and hilarious.  Note: the idea of the 'Flat Earth myth' comes from and was propagated by an atheist.   

Here are the links to the rap battle:  













Here is the original exchange on Twitter regarding the 'Flat Earth theory:'



























Source:

http://fusion.net/story/259431/neil-degrasse-tyson-bob-flat-to-fact/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialshare&utm_content=desktop+top 

Sunday, January 24, 2016

3rd Sunday in Ordinary Time - Jesus Restores

The readings today tell us of the beginning of the New People or the New Covenant.

In the first reading, we given a description of Ezra before an assembly of men, women and those children who are old enough to understand. Ezra opens a scroll and read to the people the Law. He then explain it to them. The people responded "amen amen" showing that they agreed with the content of the scroll and Ezra's explanation. What was going on here was the restablishment of the covenant after Israel was in exile. After Babylon was defeated, The king of Persia, Cyrus ordered that the Jews could leave freely.  They left and rebuilt the temple and the walls of the city of Jerusalem (Ezra 6:15-17,  Nehemiah 6:15).  Since the Jews were exiled, they lost track of the Law of Moses and what the Lord had revealed to their ancestors. Ezra's task as priest was to remind the people of the covenant and restablish the rules.  This reading ties in with the Gospel.  Without the Law, the Jews had no order or purpose. They became the slaves of other nations. Similarly, without God's law in our hearts, we become slaves to the world and all its vices (Romans 6:16). This is why we must abide by God's law as we read in the Psalm today.

God's word or His laws are Spirit and life. They are not just words on a stone tablet or paper (2 Corinthians 3:6).  These words are life itself. They are perfect and refresh the soul. Since they come from God, we can trust them (2 Samuel 7:28). God is not a deceiver (Numbers 23:19). He only wants what is best for us (Psalm 34:19). We must do our best to remain in God's law so that we can live in His grace and reach perfection (John 15:10).  This is why God left us His Catholic Church which is the body of Christ with Christ as her head as we read in the second reading (Colossians 1:18).

In the second reading, we are told that the body of Christ or His Church, is composed of many parts just like the human body. However, these parts, though different, form the ONE body of Christ. This is why the Catholic Church is the one and only true Church of Christ.  She is ONE. Christ can only have ONE body just like we each have one body. There cannot be 'churches' of Christ (Ephesians 4:5).  Only one Church is His Body and that Church is the Catholic Church. In this Church, all are one and equal (Galatians 3:28). While each one of us are different, we are One in Christ.  So "whether Jews or Greeks, slaves or free persons.. we were all given to drink of the One Spirit." Each one of us has gifts given to us by God that we must put to work in order to spread the Gospel (1 Peter 4:10). Not everyone can do the same thing. One of us may teach, another may be a student. One of us may have the gift of healing, while another may have the gift of tongues or preaching. Regardless of what gift we have. The gift that we have does not make us better than anyone else. Like an organ in the body, it has its own function which is necessary to keep the entire organism of the human body alive. The Church is the New Covenant which was signed, sealed and delivered in the blood of the Lamb (Matthew 26:28, Hebrews 13:20). Jesus in the Gospel will speak to the crowd just as Ezra did.

In the Gospel, Jesus comes back to Nazareth where He grew up. As was His custom, He went to the synagogue on the sabbath day. While there, He read from the scroll of the prohet Isaah the passage found in Isaiah 61 which reads, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,because he has anointed me to bring glad tidings to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to captives
and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free,and to proclaim a year acceptable to the Lord."  After reading this, He returns the scroll and tells the people present that "Today this Scripture passage is fulfilled in your hearing." By saying this, Jesus confirms that He is the one who was sent to restore all things, including sight to the blind and glad tidings to the poor. Like Ezra, Jesus speaks before the people of Israel and reads from the Law (in this case, Isaiah). This is telling us that Jesus is restoring the covenant by making it new. The Law is no longer ink on paper. It is a living person; the Son of God walking among us (humanity) (Galatians 3:24).  It is in Jesus that we find perfection, unity and joy. Let us continue to listen to Jesus speak to us. Let us continue to remind ourselves that we must follow God's law so as to live happily and with purpose. May Jesus Christ be praised.      







Readings:  http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings/012416.cfm





Friday, January 22, 2016

Rain, Sun or Blizzard: March For Life 2016 Unstoppable



Under the brutal cold and onset of possibly the biggest blizzard on record, Pro-Life marchers gathered at the nation's capital to protest the evil called abortion. Despite the cold and snow, there was a considerable mass of people present, though smaller than last year.  Nevertheless, the majority of those present were young people from all walks of life.  There were people present from every religion, even atheists and feminists. They all united under the cause to protect human life in all its stages of development.

Unfortunately, I was not able to attend due to my scheduling and obligations. However, I was with my brothers and sisters in spirit and prayer; supporting them on social media.  Presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was present and spoke to the marchers.  Fr. Frank Pavone, Cardinal Sean o' Malley and many others were present as well.  As usual, a few hateful pro abortion protesters stood on the sidelines trolling the participants. They were drowned out by the cheerful prayers, songs and chants from the pro-life marchers.

Kudos to those brave soldiers for life!  God will reward you for bearing the weather to call for the protection of all human life in all its stages of development!

Here are some photos and tweets of the event which was a success once again despite the inclement weather.



Source:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/01/22/the-march-for-life-the-nations-largest-annual-anti-abortion-rally-draws-a-smaller-crowd-as-blizzard-approaches/

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/photos-hollywood-superstar-joins-thousands-at-march-for-life/

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/01/22/tens-of-thousands-of-pro-lifers-march-for-life-and-mourn-58-million-abortions/

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/22/snowpocalypse-doesnt-stop-march-for-life-protesters/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/evangelicals-are-joining-the-catholic-march-for-life-this-year/2016/01/21/255bfc20-c060-11e5-bcda-62a36b394160_story.html

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/21/activist-theres-nothing-more-beautiful-than-the-march-for-life-even-in-the-snow/

http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2016/January/March-for-Life-Protesters-Brave-Blizzard-to-Speak-for-the-Unborn/

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/evangelicals-gather-march-life-plan-less-angry-less-white-anti-abortion-movement





























Thursday, January 21, 2016

Pope Updates Feet Washing Rite



The Holy Father Pope Francis has issued a decree (Decreto della Congregazione per il Culto Divino e la Disciplina dei Sacramenti sul Rito della “Lavanda dei Piedi”, 21.01.2016) signed by Cardinal Sarah making changes to the "Feet Washing" rite on Holy Thursday.

It says:

Original Italian:
Lettera del Santo Padre al Prefetto della Congregazione per il Culto Divino e la Disciplina dei Sacramenti sul Rito della “Lavanda dei Piedi” nella Liturgia della Messa in Cœna Domini, 21.01.2016
[B0041]
Al venerato Fratello
Signor Cardinale ROBERT SARAH
Prefetto della Congregazione
per il Culto Divino e la Disciplina dei Sacramenti
Signor Cardinale,
come ho avuto modo di dirLe a voce, da qualche tempo sto riflettendo sul Rito della “Lavanda dei piedi”, contenuto nella Liturgia della Messa in Cœna Domini, nell’intento di migliorarne le modalità di attuazione, affinché esprimano pienamente il significato del gesto compiuto da Gesù nel Cenacolo, il suo donarsi “fino alla fine” per la salvezza del mondo, la sua carità senza confini.
Dopo attenta ponderazione, sono giunto alla deliberazione di apportare un cambiamento nelle rubriche del Messale Romano. Dispongo pertanto che venga modificata la rubrica secondo la quale le persone prescelte per ricevere la Lavanda dei piedi debbano essere uomini o ragazzi, in modo tale che da ora in poi i Pastori della Chiesa possano scegliere i partecipanti al rito tra tutti i membri del Popolo di Dio. Si raccomandi inoltre che ai prescelti venga fornita un’adeguata spiegazione del significato del rito stesso.
Grato per il prezioso servizio di codesto Dicastero, assicuro a Lei, Signor Cardinale, al Segretario e a tutti i collaboratori il mio ricordo nella preghiera e, formulando i migliori auguri per il Santo Natale, invio a ciascuno la Benedizione Apostolica.
Dal Vaticano, 20 dicembre 2014
FRANCISCUS
[00085-IT.01] [Testo originale: Italiano]



English:
"The reform of the Holy Week, by the decree Maxima Redemptionis nostrae mysteria of November 1955, provides the faculty, where counselled by pastoral motives, to perform the washing of the feet of twelve men during the Mass of the Lord's Supper, after the reading of the Gospel according to John, as if almost to represent Christ's humility and love for His disciples.
In the Roman liturgy this rite was handed down with the name of the Mandatum of the Lord on brotherly charity in accordance with Jesus' words, sung in the Antiphon during the celebration.
In performing this rite, bishops and priests are invited to conform intimately to Christ who 'came not to be served but to serve' and, driven by a love 'to the end', to give His life for the salvation of all humankind.
To manifest the full meaning of the rite to those who participate in it, the Holy Father Francis has seen fit to change the rule by in the Roman Missal (p.300, No. 11) according to which the chosen men are accompanied by the ministers, which must therefore be modified as follows: 'Those chosen from among the People of God are accompanied by the ministers' (and consequently in the Caeremoniale Episcoporum No. 301 and No. 299 b referring to the seats for the chosen men, so that pastors may choose a group of faithful representing the variety and unity of every part of the People of God. This group may consist of men and women, and ideally of the young and the old, healthy and sick, clerics, consecrated persons and laypeople.
This Congregation for Divine Worship and the Disipline of the Sacraments, by means of the faculties granted by the Supreme Pontiff, introduces this innovation in the liturgical books of the Roman Rite, recalling pastors of their duty to instruct adequately both the chosen faithful and others, so that they may participate in the rite consciously, actively and fruitfully".


As expected, so-called 'Traditionalist' bloggers have taken to their blogs to voice their wrath and attacks against the Holy Father.  Blogger 'Rorate Caeli' wrote on his blog:

[New Catholic: Two comments on historical matters. (1) This is one of the signs of irreformable acts by Francis. Since the beginning of his pontificate, his main supporters, including Cardinal Maradiaga, have insisted that the Pope wanted his reforms to be so great and symbolic no successor of his could ever overturn them. This is surely one example. (2) What is most tragic is to see the very same impulses that imploded Anglicanism imposed on Latin Church decades later. These impulses are not only untraditional -- which may be an advantageous characteristic in the Pope's mind -- but counterproductive. Unless the intention is to destroy the soul and strength of the Church, weaken Her even more, and to sow doubts on the immutability of symbolic explanations for the Male Priesthood in the Catholic Church. Surely that is not what was intended and what was sought. Surely not!]

The changes allows the washing of the feet of women, men, children, the elderly, clerics, religion and possibly non-Catholics/Christians since the decree says, "both the chosen faithful and others."  This change reflects the call to mercy that Pope Francis has focused on since the onset of his pontificate and this year of mercy.

In the rubrics it says,

"After the Homily, where a pastoral reason suggests it, the Washing of Feet follows. The men who have been chosen (viri selecti) are led by the ministers to seats prepared in a suitable place. Then the priest (removing his chasuble if necessary) goes to each one, and, with the help of the ministers, pours water over each one's feet and then dries them."

The word 'viri" is masculine and can mean men as in males or human beings in general, i.e MANkind, HuMAN, all MEN.  Traditionalists believe that only men should have their feet washed since Jesus did choose 12 men.  However, since the word 'viri' can mean both male(men) and humanity in general, then the rubric does implicitly allow for women and children to have their feet washed during the Mass of the Last Supper.

Pope Francis is using this change as a symbolic gesture showing that he is welcoming all just like Christ did. This is the purpose of the rite. We are called to wash one another's feet regardless of gender or background. Traditionalists who believe the rite only pertains to males missed the point Jesus was trying to make in the washing of feet.  Remember, the Last Supper washing of the feet was an example of what the apostles had to do. Naturally, they would have found themselves in scenarios that are not identical as the supper, so imitating the washing to the letter would not make sense.

 "Rorate Caeli" and others do not have an argument in this case since Pope Francis clearly stated that participants must understand the meaning behind the washing of the feet. This means that the rite was not changed to accomodate feminists or water down Catholicism. Those who are chosen must know what they are getting into beforehand.

I must admit, I do have mixed feelings about this as many will take it out of context just like "Rorate Caeli" and others have.  However, since the decree specifically states that pastors have to inform the participants on the meaning of the rite, then I am at ease.  I think Jesus would approve of this since he was inclusive and merciful. The rites of the Church are meant to feed us spiritually.  They are not meant to be habits that we blindly imitate. If a Catholic is worried about whose feet is being washed rather than why the feet are washed, then this Catholic is not internalizing the message.  He or she is not growing spiritually and is focusing only on the externals just like the Pharisees. As one of my instructors from the Oratory wrote in his book On the Lord's Appearing, "Tradition is the living faith of the dead, traditionalism the dead faith of the living."

We must be careful not to become like the Pharisees who were living a dead faith based on rigid understanding and implementation of rules rather than absorbing the spirit of them. Moreover, the Pope has the power of the keys to change or leave things the as is. "Rorate Caeli" and others who think like him do not understand theology nor Catholicism.  Perhaps it may be time for them to leave the Church and start their own just like Luther did if all they are going to do is complain, disparage and slander the Pope and adhere to nostalgia, rather than work on their salvation and that of others.











Source:

http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/de/bollettino/pubblico/2016/01/21/0041/00085.html

http://www.news.va/en/news/the-pope-decrees-that-not-only-men-may-be-chosen-f

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-christian-easter-holy-thursday-foot-washing-decree-women/

http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/pope-changes-church-law-for-gender-friendly-pre-easter-rite/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/pope-changes-church-law-for-gender-friendly-pre-easter-rite/2016/01/21/cc228424-c043-11e5-98c8-7fab78677d51_story.html

http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-inevitable-takes-place-pope-francis.html

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/women-may-now-have-their-feet-washed-at-holy-thursday-mass-pope-says-64684/

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2016/01/21/pope-francis-opens-holy-thursday-foot-washing-rite-to-women/



Bishops Need To Monitor Blogs

The Case for Catholic Bishops to Monitor Catholic Blogs: Safeguarding Truth and Unity in the Digital Age

In the digital age, the proliferation of Catholic blogs and online content has transformed how the faithful engage with their faith. Laypeople, priests, and self-proclaimed theologians share their perspectives on the Catechism, Scripture, Church teachings, and liturgy through blogs, websites, and social media platforms. While this democratization of discourse can foster vibrant discussions, it also poses significant risks. Many of these voices, lacking proper oversight, present themselves as authoritative, spreading misinformation, personal biases, or even heretical ideas. This unchecked content creates division among Catholics, fuels factionalism, and undermines the unity of the Church. To address this growing issue, Catholic bishops must take an active role in monitoring Catholic blogs and online content, drawing on the Church’s time-tested tradition of oversight, such as the nihil obstat and imprimatur, to ensure fidelity to doctrine and foster unity. The Problem: Unregulated Voices Claiming Authority The internet has given everyone a platform, and Catholic blogs are no exception. From lay apologists to priests with large online followings, countless individuals publish content claiming to represent authentic Catholic teaching. While many bloggers are well-intentioned, others overstep their bounds, presenting their interpretations of the Catechism, Scripture, or liturgical practices as definitive. This can mislead the faithful, particularly those less versed in theology, who may assume these voices carry magisterial weight. For example, some bloggers assert their personal views on controversial topics—such as the interpretation of Amoris Laetitia or the validity of certain liturgical practices—without grounding their arguments in the Church’s official teachings. Others engage in speculative “thought experiments” that border on heresy, such as questioning core doctrines like the Real Presence or the indissolubility of marriage. These writings often gain traction because they are provocative, generating clicks and followers at the expense of truth. The result is a fragmented Catholic community, with factions forming around popular bloggers who align with specific ideological leanings, whether traditionalist, progressive, or somewhere in between. This phenomenon is not merely a matter of differing opinions. When bloggers present their views as authoritative without proper vetting, they risk leading souls astray. The Catechism of the Catholic Church emphasizes the importance of the Magisterium—the teaching authority of the Church, entrusted to the Pope and bishops—as the authentic interpreter of Scripture and Tradition (CCC 85-87). Yet, many Catholic bloggers bypass this authority, creating confusion and division among the faithful. The Historical Precedent: Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur The Catholic Church has long recognized the need to oversee publications to protect the faithful from error. For centuries, the nihil obstat (“nothing obstructs”) and imprimatur (“let it be printed”) have served as mechanisms to ensure that books and other materials align with Church teaching. These declarations, issued by a bishop or a designated censor, confirm that a work is free from doctrinal or moral error. While not an endorsement of every opinion expressed, they provide assurance that the content does not contradict the faith. This system emerged in response to the printing press, which, like the internet today, revolutionized the dissemination of information. The Church recognized that unchecked publications could spread heresy or confusion, as seen in the Reformation era. By requiring oversight, the Church sought to balance freedom of expression with fidelity to truth. Today, the digital landscape presents a similar challenge, but on a far larger scale. Blogs and websites reach millions instantly, amplifying the potential for harm when misinformation or heresy spreads unchecked. The Digital Challenge: Why Oversight Is Urgently Needed Unlike traditional publications, blogs operate in a largely unregulated space. Anyone with an internet connection can launch a website, claim the title of “Catholic commentator,” and publish content that appears authoritative. This accessibility, while empowering, has led to a proliferation of problematic content. For instance, some blogs promote extreme views, such as sedevacantism or radical reinterpretations of Vatican II, which directly contradict the Church’s authority. Others misrepresent Church teaching on social issues, leading readers to embrace positions that are incompatible with Catholic doctrine. This lack of oversight has tangible consequences. First, it undermines the unity of the Church. When bloggers promote competing visions of Catholicism, they create “clicks” or factions—groups of Catholics who align with a particular blogger’s ideology rather than the universal Church. This factionalism erodes the sense of communion that is central to Catholic identity (1 Corinthians 1:10). Second, it confuses the faithful, particularly those seeking guidance in a complex world. A layperson encountering conflicting interpretations of Church teaching online may struggle to discern truth from error, leading to spiritual harm. Moreover, the profit motive exacerbates the problem. Many Catholic blogs rely on clicks, subscriptions, or donations to sustain themselves. Sensationalist headlines, divisive rhetoric, and provocative “hot takes” attract attention, even if they distort Church teaching. This dynamic incentivizes bloggers to prioritize engagement over accuracy, further muddying the waters. A Solution: Episcopal Oversight of Catholic Blogs To address these challenges, Catholic bishops should establish a system of oversight for Catholic blogs and websites, modeled on the nihil obstat and imprimatur. This does not mean censoring free speech or stifling legitimate theological discussion. Rather, it means ensuring that content claiming to represent Catholic teaching is vetted for fidelity to the Magisterium. Here’s how such a system could work: 1. Voluntary Certification Process: Bishops could create a mandatory certification process for Catholic blogs and websites. Bloggers who wish to present their content as authentically Catholic could submit their work to a diocesan review board, which would assess it for doctrinal accuracy. Approved blogs could display a digital “seal of approval,” similar to an imprimatur, signaling to readers that the content aligns with Church teaching. This would not restrict bloggers from writing, but would distinguish vetted content from unverified opinions. 2. Guidelines for Bloggers: The Church could issue clear guidelines for Catholic bloggers, outlining the importance of fidelity to the Magisterium and discouraging speculative or divisive content. These guidelines could include recommendations for citing official Church documents, avoiding sensationalism, and acknowledging the limits of personal authority. 3. Education and Accountability: Bishops could work with Catholic universities and seminaries to educate bloggers and content creators about the importance of theological accuracy. Additionally, dioceses could maintain a public list of approved blogs, making it easier for the faithful to find trustworthy resources. Bloggers who persistently spread misinformation or heresy could be publicly corrected, as the Church has done historically with erroneous teachings. 4. Collaboration with Lay Experts: Recognizing the scale of the digital landscape, bishops could collaborate with lay theologians, canon lawyers, and tech-savvy Catholics to monitor online content. This partnership would ensure that oversight is both thorough and practical, leveraging the expertise of the laity while maintaining episcopal authority. Addressing Objections Critics may argue that monitoring Catholic blogs infringes on freedom of speech or stifles creativity. However, the Church has never viewed freedom as a license to spread error. As St. Paul writes, “Test everything; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Oversight would not prevent bloggers from expressing their views but would ensure that those claiming to speak for the Church do so responsibly. Others may claim that bishops lack the resources or expertise to monitor the vast digital landscape. While this is a valid concern, the Church has faced similar challenges before and adapted. By leveraging technology and lay expertise, bishops can create scalable systems to address the problem without overburdening diocesan resources. The Path Forward: Unity and Truth The Catholic Church is called to be a beacon of truth in a world of confusion. In the digital age, this mission requires vigilance to ensure that Catholic blogs and websites reflect the authentic teachings of the Church. By implementing a system of oversight inspired by the nihil obstat and imprimatur, bishops can protect the faithful from misinformation, curb division, and foster unity. This approach respects the freedom of bloggers while upholding the Church’s responsibility to safeguard the deposit of faith. As Catholics navigate the complexities of the modern world, they deserve online resources they can trust. By taking an active role in monitoring Catholic blogs, bishops can help ensure that the digital sphere becomes a place of authentic evangelization, not division or error. The stakes are high—souls are at stake, and the unity of the Church hangs in the balance. The time for action is now.


Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Planet Nine in Solar System?

Evidence seems to point to an undiscovered planet beyond the demoted planet Pluto.  Caltech researchers believe there is a giant planet which orbits 20 times farther than the and takes about 20,000 years to make a full revolution. The planet is believed to be 10 times the size of Earth.  Dr Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown used mathematical modeling and simulations to make the discovery. However, no empirical evidence has been presented that shows the planet in it natural form.  The news was revealed in The Astronomical Journal: Evidence For A Distant Giant Planet In The Solar System

Some astronomers believe Pluto may be a satellite or former satellite of this newly discovered planet. For centuries, cultures have speculated that a large planet existed outside of the visible Solar System. This object has been called 'Nibiru' or 'Planet X.'  Ideas have circulated that ancient aliens live on this planet and visited Earth when their planet was closer to the Sun. These ideas are of course part of the human imagination and no evidence exists supporting the stories. However, this will not stop so-called 'Ancient Astronaut Theorists' from taking this news story and running to the wind with it.

In any event, the discover is amazing and shows how little we know of our own 'backyard,' the Solar System.

   





Source:

https://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-find-evidence-real-ninth-planet-49523

http://mediaassets.caltech.edu/documents/45-p9_kbo_extras_orbits_2_.jpg


http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system

https://amp.twimg.com/v/6bad722e-9a4c-46aa-b0fc-7a189bd74dd9

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/science/article/Discovery-of-Planet-9-Nibiru-will-make-people-6773016.php

http://time.com/4184942/planet-9-new-pluto-solar-system/

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/planet-nine-evidence-grows-for-1347529463955510.html

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Alleged Pee Drinking Gay Priest Spotted

Alleged pee drinking gay priest, Peter Miqueli who resigned before Christmas 2015 after accusations rose from some of his parishioners at St. Francis de Chantal that he was stealing money to fund a gay lifestyle with hunky Keith Crist was spotted at his home in New Jersey.  Miqueli has been the focus of an investigation by some lay faithful at the Bronx parish of St. Francis de Chantal.  They accuse him of having a boyfriend-for-pay, stealing money to support him and himself as well as other abuses.  See: http://www.sacerdotus.com/2015/12/50-shades-of-pray-priest-hunk-dolan-oh.html

Miqueli was spotted at a New Jersey home that is in his name. Neighbors also claim that his boyfriend-for-pay Keith Crist has also been seen entering the home.  They have voiced their disgust at the presence of this 'man of God' and wish that he would leave as his presence is disgracing their community. Miqueli was seen leaving a store with power ball tickets, possibly looking to win the over one billion jackpot; so much for living a modest life as Pope Francis has called for.   He was also spotted driving a luxury car; another violation of what the Pope has been calling for in regards to how priests should live and what canon law states.


  • Can. 276 §1. In leading their lives, clerics are bound in a special way to pursue holiness since, having been consecrated to God by a new title in the reception of orders, they are dispensers of the mysteries of God in the service of His people.
  • Can. 282 §1. Clerics are to foster simplicity of life and are to refrain from all things that have a semblance of vanity.
  • Can. 285 §1. Clerics are to refrain completely from all those things which are unbecoming to their state, according to the prescripts of particular law.
  • §2. Clerics are to avoid those things which, although not unbecoming, are nevertheless foreign to the clerical state.


I have remained as objective as I can on this matter; however, the accused priest is looking more and more guilty of what parishioners have been accusing him of despite the archdiocese of New York not finding anything off in regards to the parish's finances.  The home that is allegedly his and was bought with parish money is indeed owned by him, see: http://njparcels.com/property/1507/446.10/17.  Moreover, the address used for the purchase of the home is that of the Catholic Church (St. Frances Cabrini) where Miqueli previously was assigned to, see: http://njparcels.com/sales/1507_446.10_17.  It is unfortunate that the archdiocese of New York is more concerned about finances than the spiritual life of this priest.  Not one word was given regarding his alleged homosexual behavior which seems to be well supported with evidence.  















Source:

http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/disgraced-priest-still-seeing-his-sex-master-in-secret-neighbors/   

Monday, January 18, 2016

Ted Cruz: 'New York Values'

During the Republican debate, Ted Cruz offended New  Yorkers by describing them as having 'New York Values.'  He insinuated that New Yorkers are slanted towards the left and have no 'real values.'  Donald Trump shot back at him reminding everyone of the values seen on 911 and that Cruz's comments were offensive.  Trump is correct.  The Daily News immediately took to the presses posting an image of the Statue of Liberty flipping the middle finger at Ted Cruz.

Many pundits are calling Cruz's comments as an embarrassment and blunder.  Governor Cuomo and others came out attacking Cruz for his comments.  It seems that Ted Cruz is anti-New York or extremely ignorant. The majority of the state is Republican!  Those liberals Ted Cruz is obsessed with are mostly found in New York City.  Upstate, the majority of counties ARE Republican.  In fact, Republican mayors have been elected in New York City showing that no such liberal faction controls the city in regards to voting.

Most likely, Cruz's stupid comments will hurt him in April when New York is set to vote in the primaries.  I applaud Donald Trump for defending New York.  No disrespect to Texas, but Pope Saint John Paul II dubbed New York City as the capital of the world because of its importance.  Texas is just a state with possibly the most obese people in the states and most uneducated.  Many refuse to accept evolution.  Texas cannot compare to my home state New York.  








Source:

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/01/15/embarrassing-ny-daily-news-cover-defending-new-york-values-not-suitable-for-children-294702?hvid=4iBeCI

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/16/ted-cruz-attacks-ultra-liberal-york-ultra-conservative-trump.html

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/18/ted-cruz-new-york-values-and-the-myth-of-rural-superiority/


Fourth #DemDebate



The fourth Democratic presidential debate took place last night. Each candidate spoke on healthcare, the economy and social issues.  They argued over healthcare with Sanders pushing for a better healthcare plan that includes all and is more affordable.  Clinton accused Sanders of wanting to start from scratch and said that would be a big mistake.  The arguments, formulations and so forth would further delay universal healthcare for all Americans.

On the economy, each candidate presented their ideas which were very similar. However, Sanders pushed for free college and other ideas that resemble socialism.  He also wants to increase taxes.  O' Malley argued that he has more experience at implementing change due to his terms as an elected official.  At one point of the debate, Sanders became annoyed with the moderator Andrea Mitchell when she asked about Bill Clinton's sex scandal. On social issues,

Sanders stated that he would have police officers made accountable whenever they violate the law or kill unarmed individuals.  He believes that the department of Justice should handle such scenarios, not local prosecutors.  For the most part, the debate showed three candidates who often did not answer the question directly and attacked on another.  Clinton and Sanders often went at it taking on a contrarian role.  At times, O'Malley tried to redirect the debate towards attacking Republicans.  





Source:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/17/politics/democratic-debate-2016-highlights/

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/17/463429928/the-fourth-democratic-debate-in-100-words-plus-a-vine-and-2-videos

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-democratic-debate-20160117-story.html

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sanders-goes-off-democratic-041432300.html



Sunday, January 17, 2016

2nd Sunday in Ordinary Time: The Wedding

Today's readings are about evangelization.

In the first reading, Isaiah says that he will not be silent for the sake of Zion and Jerusalem.  He has to give witness to God. The people of God are a glorious crown, a royal diadem. These people will be united to God as a young man marries a virgin; as a bridegroom his bride.  This reading reminds us that the Church is the bride of Christ (Ephesians 5:25-27).  At the end of time, this bride will marry the bridegroom who is Jesus (Revelation 21:2). Those in humanity who united to the Church and remained faithful will be restored (Romans 8:22, Acts 3:21).  Their link with God which has been severed or weakened by sin will be repaired. Before all of this happens, we must proclaim God's deeds to all the nations as the Psalm tells us (Matthew 28:19 ).  This is evangelization.

We must sing to the Lord and anounce His salvation to all the Earth.  It is in our love and our joy that we attract others to God (Philippians 4:4).  If we are people with gloomy faces looking to fulfill and obligation, then people will not seek anything in us or from us (Matthew 6:16, Sirach 25:23). However, if we shine bright with God's grace; with God's Good News, then why will seek it as well because everyone wants to be joyous, not miserable. This is why the Holy Spirit was sent to us and gives us distinct gifts as we are told in the second reading.

The same and One Spirit gives different gifts to each of us. He gives different forms of services, but they are all rendered unto the Lord. They all come from God (Nehemiah 9:20, John 20:22). Some may have the gift of wisom and expression of knowledge.  Others may have the expression of faith, healing, mighty deeds, propchecy, discerning of spirits and tongues. While different, each gift serves a person. The gifts of tongues is speaking in a way that everyone understands.  It is not gibberish or sounds that make no sense as our friends in the Pentecostal sect believe the gift of tongues is.  Speaking gibberish does not spread the kingdom of God.  It brings about mockery from the heathen. We must put the gifts God gives us to use in promoting the Gospel (Psalm 68:18, Acts 5:32). For now, I am using websites, social media, radio podcasts, Google hangouts and books to do this. I also do street evangelization. God may change this in the future and have me do something else. What gifts did God give you? How does He want you to spread the Good News? These gifts are meant to promote God, not ourselves or our agenda. We sometimes see blogs out there or certain personalities who use their gifts to preach gossip or attacks against the Pope and our bishops calling them 'wicked' or 'modernists.'  This is not of the Holy Spirit. These kinds of messages are demonic which seeks to undermine the Catholic Church and cause doubt (1 Peter 5:8). Moreover, we must not envy the gifts of others (Galatians 5:26). Not everyone is supposed to evangelize in the same manner. Be happy that God has entrusted you with a gift and mission.

Lastly in the Gospel, we read of Christ's first miracle which came as a result of Our Lady's intercession. Jesus and Mary are at a wedding feast. This shows us their humanity. Being of God does not mean we have to be stiff, rigid stoics who do not enjoy life (Ecclesiastes 9:7). Everything about God is a joyous occasion, a feast. Moreover, we are told that the wine ran out. Mary tells Jesus and He responds in a blunt manner, "Woman, how does your concern affect me? My hour has not yet come."  Despite this direct responds, Mary tells the serves, "Do whatever he tells you.'  We see here how Mary brings Jesus to perform a miracle before the time set showing the intercessory power Mary has. She pleads for us at the right hand of her Son Christ.  Jesus then performs the miracle of transforming jars of water into the best tasting wine. This reading not only shows us Mary's intercession, Christ's power and a wedding party; it is a reminder of the first reading.  God is going to marry His people; the Church (Revelation 19:7; 21:9). This is what the Catholic Church has her eyes on: the wedding feast of the Lamb and herself.  Let us pray to the Holy Spirit to tell us what to do and how to do it.  Let us ask Him to give us the gifts and means to do this.  While we do our work of evangelizing, let us never forget Mary who intercedes for us.  May Jesus Christ be praised.


Readings:  http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings/011716.cfm

Friday, January 15, 2016

Norm of the North Movie



I just watched Norm of the North with my nephew.  The movie was pretty good.  It is about a polar bear named Norm who can speak to human beings.  However, when Norm and his friends learn that a real estate company is planning to ship homes to the arctic in order to populate it, he goes on a mission to save his home. While on the mission, he learns that his grandfather who long ago went on a mission was captured by the villain, Mr. Greene.  Guided by his friend Socrates and accompanied by lemmings,  Norm embarks to New York City to search for his grandfather. 

While there, he passes off as a mascot helping Mr. Greene promote his homes at the arctic idea. Norm also learns that Mr. Greene is the puppet of a board which seeks to capitalize on the environment. After rescuing his grandfather, he goes to inform Pablo who is the one financing the project and who has no idea how his money is being used.  The movie has a lot of action, violence and other things which may offend some parents.  

Overall, the move is good and was clearly made to show awareness of global warming and the affects human beings have on the environment.  If you do not subscribe to the science on environmental issues, then this movie is not for you.  Nevertheless, it teaches kids to work to solve problems and fight for causes that they follow.  The best lesson is that it promotes concern for our world and the importance of preserving natural environments and the species they contain.  



Thursday, January 14, 2016

2nd #GopDebate on Fox Business



The second Republican debate on Fox Business was held. The undercard featued Carly Fiorina, Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum.  Rand Paul opted out of the debate.  In this debate, each candidate did extremely well.  Huckabee came out strong speaking for the common man while Santorum was very passionate about the family, keeping America safe and the economy.  Fiorina focused on attacking Clinton and even made an indirect remark saying she loves to spend time with her husband which was interpreted as an attack against Bill Clinton.  In this under card debate, I think Santorum did well.  However, each candidate did pretty good.

In the main event debate, we saw Trump's and Cruz's 'bromance' dissolve as both went at it over Cruz's eligibility to run for president since he was born in Canada. The crowd booed Trump's insistance on the issue while Cruz fought back saying he will not take legal advice from Trump while Trump resonded that Cruz needs to ask his Harvard professors.  Trump did pretty well in this debate and I believe he won.  He was much better prepared and stood ground when attacked.  Marco Rubio and Chris Christie also went at it after Rubio attacked Christie for supporting many of Obama's ideas.  Christie shot back saying that Rubio told Bush that someone adviced him to attack him and said that that 'someone' "whispered" to Rubio the same advice. Rubio also went after Cruz's flip flopping at the senate.  Carl Carson was not strong in this debate and hardly spoke. He simply made some wise crack statements causing laughter and did not engage upon his own platform. Kasich did well as well, but did not 'tango' with the other candidates.  Bush did much better in this debate than in previous ones. However, he has failed to really set up a shining moment. Trump was strong and came across as a realist. He and Cruz had another moment when Cruz attacked New Yorkers saying they had no values and that no conservatives come from there.  Trump defended New York citing the heroism demonstrated on September 11, 2001.






Source:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/15/us/politics/transcript-of-republican-presidential-debate.html?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur

http://www.foxbusiness.com/live-coverage/fox-business-network-gop-debates

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/14/politics/republican-debate-2016-highlights/index.html?eref=rss_latest

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/15/us/politics/what-you-have-missed-so-far-in-the-debate.html?_r=0

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/crowd-boos-trump-over-cruz-birther-attack-030303422.html